#anti endo reposting

[moos3-th3-goos3]

[fooltemps]

25px Pride Flags pt1!

Flags in Order: Rainbow, Gay, Bisexual, Lesbian, Pansexual, Nonbinary, Transgender, Intersex, Polyamory, AroAce

Free to use, no credit needed but appreciated!!

Link to all 25px pride flags here!!

[kissingcomputers]

[blakesdoggo]

a icon i made for myself :3

[sys-heart-kiddos]

Hello!

[pt: hello!]

My name is Mox and I'm a 4 year old syskid! I might be traumagenic, but my system is mixed origin.

I decided to make this blog because all the current syskid blogs are meanies who don't like endo systems!

This blog is specifically for syskids, though agere littles are free to interact as long as they don't send in requests!

We provide… userboxes! Pfps! Stimboards! Emoji combos! so feel free to send in a request or just chat!

DNI: -Kink, NSFW, DDLG (and any other varients) -Anti endo meanies! -Radqueers and/or trans"ID"s -PD abuse believers -W!lliam Gold/W!blur Soot supporters -Abelists, racists, sexists, etc. -Any kind of lgbtphobe

[fossys]

Hey guess who remembered why we stopped being active in plural communities in the first place <-people are dicks

[systemserendipity]

Our System Memes Dump™️

[the-bee-hive-system0-0]

Just did some art of Valentine (she/he/they/star/kit/candie/bug/mew/clown) from @the-firefly-jar-system

Super happy with how this came out!!!

[heavens-roses]

I agree with anon while race and gender isn't always the best comparison it helps explain why perisex afab shouldn't use the tfem/twomen when talking about parts in a system. As for what the post said in genderal:

Being afab =/= equal perisex. Please stop using afab as a term for perisex aka non intersex people because many CTF intersex or people who are intersex afab can still be affected by transmisogyny. Also no perisex afab can't be transfem either. You can't transition (as a perisex) person to gender or presentation level you already were.* Intersex people are different and your ASAB can be whatever your parents of doctors want if it's harder to tell at birth or simply because your CTF/M.

* I beg people to stop saying you can be transfem and perisex afab. That is not how it works, you are already the presentation/gender you want. There is literally no way for a perisex afab to transition because again they are already at that same level of femininity. If you aren't transfem don't speak for us!! It's just like how we shouldn't speak over transmascs and their issues.

Alters cannot be a trans woman if the body is AFAB the same way alters cannot be BIPOC if the body is white. Can they present in headspace as a trans woman or BIPOC? Yes, but if they are not such with the body, then they will never experience that same level of oppression that people who are have. AFAB bodies will not experience transmisogyny, and White bodies will not experience racism or colorism. This is my take, and while alters can appear as a trans woman or BIPOC and may more personally align as one, since the body is AFAB, they don't experience that same experience, therefore they can't exactly say "I'm a trans woman" even if it's talking more personally

yes, exactly. they can present as it but can't necessarily identify as it. they could identify as trans-fem (fem non-binary, demi-girl, ect) but not as a trans woman since they'd never experience the transphobia or anything for that.

[moos3-th3-goos3]

What if I just started going by a different name and pronouns and had different likes and ideas and memories and opinions and presented differently and acted differently... but like I'm still me though... no I'm not a system at all...

[arcadeofghosts]

“Wow, it’s almost like you can read my mind.” says the guy who I share a brain with

[interstellar-cluster]

Almost-friendly sysmed reminder

Firstly, anti-endos be respectful. This post isn’t to bash you or disordered systems. It is meant to educate people on the DID/OSDD criteria and how the DSM-5 and ICD-11 both essentially prove the existence of non-disordered systems.

Please also note that we’re endogenic. We don’t have any diagnoses and we’re taking the information in the DSM-5 and ICD-11 at face-value.

Another note: This post is also not meant to say that people’s experiences are invalid or not true. Once again, we’re taking this information of the diagnostic criteria for DID at face value, and this doesn’t account for personal experiences. This is purely the diagnostic criteria for DID/OSDD. We also don’t have a lot of information on UDD so we won’t be talking about that here.

Every system is valid.

The rest of this will be under the cut because it is LONG and I don’t want to clog up my page.

So we’ll get right to the point. Trauma is not part of the diagnostic criteria for DID/OSDD, nor is the disorder developing in early childhood part of the disorder. Trauma is very commonly associated with trauma in early childhood but this doesn’t mean that the disorder requires trauma to develop.

Regarding the Structural Dissociation Theory, this is only a theory. It might be proved, disproved, changed or they may not fit every experience. Theories aren’t concrete, and the human brain is so incredibly complex that it’s almost impossible at this time and age to prove anything.

Criterion 3 in the DSM-5 and criterion 6 in the ICD-11 state that the plurality or symptoms of such must be distressing for the plural with the disorder. If the plurality is not distressing or, in the ICD-11, causing significant impairment in important areas of functioning (personal, social, educational, etc), then it is not a disorder.

These criteria are explicitly stated to exclude plurals who do NOT find that their plurality causes impairment to their functioning. This inherently means that plurality CAN exist without causing distress or impairment.

Another criterion that explicitly excludes non-traumagenic systems from the DID criteria is that the plurality must not be part of normal cultural or religious practices. This includes tulpamancy and is, once again, stated to exclude these types of plurality from being diagnosed with DID because they are recognised to be non-traumagenic and that they exist.

So, TLDR; trauma isn’t necessary for plurality; you need to be distressed about the symptoms of your plurality to be disordered which, by extension, means that non-disordered plurality exists; and cultural and religious practices are excluded from the criteria of DID which means that doctors acknowledge that plurality can exist without being disordered.

(This entire post also occurs to OSDD because it generally follows the same criteria as DID with either DID criterion A or B or both not occurring in OSDD patients.)

Thanks for coming to our Ted Talk. We’re not looking to discuss this, sysmeds/anti-endos can look but do not interact. We will freely block anyone who reposts this just to argue for the sake of ridiculing endo systems.

- 🕸️🎧

[frb-but-even-better]

Happy Holidays, dumbasses <333 (pwease)

Randobitchyasscoiningshite -> FeralRadicalBastards -> Frb-but-cooler -> Feralradicalfreaklets -> Frb-but-even-better

Bodily Minor  ⟡ Traumagenic Plural System

20+ members  ⟡ Collectively Citrusqueer

Anti-(nc)abuse  ⟡ Pro-consent  ⟡ Neu-rq

Pro-para  ⟡ Anti-CSEM  ⟡ Pro-endo

We make terms & userboxes & BAA  ⟡  Req rules

‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎‎ ‎‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎‎‎ ‎ ‎ ‎‎ ‎‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ i.‎‎‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎‎ ‎‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎‎ ‎‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎‎ ii.

‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎‎ ‎ ‎ Taken Anons ::

‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎‎To be started…

‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎‎ ‎ ‎ You can claim one by just sending us an ask with the specific signoff you want <3

Made on mobile website

Tags meanings below the cut

‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎‎ # 🌷 ⪧ FRB Speaks ｡°✩ = Talking

‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎‎ # 🍄 ⪧ Stranger Speaks ｡°✩ = Answering Asks

‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎‎ # 🧸 ⪧ [Signoff] Speaks ｡°✩ = [Signoff] ask

‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎‎ # ☔️ ⪧ Storm Warning ｡°✩ = Discourse

‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎‎ # 🧺 ⪧ Crow’s Collection ｡°✩ = Saved Term

‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎‎ # 🍯 ⪧ Crow’s Delivery ｡°✩ = Repost

‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎‎ # 🌿 ⪧ Beautiful Creation ｡°✩ = Coined Term

‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎‎ # 🥧 ⪧ Beautiful Being ｡°✩ = Alter / Headmate Pack

‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎ ‎‎ # 🍓 ⪧ Beautiful Signs ｡°✩ = Userbox

[d1rlin]

Saving for mx blue

[Text: This alter is a fictive of Jinx, not Powder.]

[Text: This alter is a fictive of Jinx, don't call it Powder /srs]

Like/Reblog if you save or use!

[gw3nst4cy0-o]

— VampQueer / WineQueer !

Vampqueer or WineQueer It is a queer stance focused on paraphilias and their acceptance in society (this includes paraphilic disorder) in an immoral way, they believe that feeling an attraction does not equal an act.

PRO ::

Pro-Para

Pro-Transid

Pro-Radqueer

Pro-cosang

Pro-Consent

Pro-Endo

Anti censorship

Does not support ::

Paraphilias without consent

Far right

Anti-Para

Censorship

Anti-Transid

Anti-Endo

Exclusion of contradictory labels

(( Any form of contact is welcome. ))

This term was stolen by bupsafr3ak here on tumblr, the original term is mine but I lost the other account and I'm reposting it!

[moos3-th3-goos3]

how our fictives feel joining roleplays as themselves