#Radqueers are another good example.

[carnage-cathedral]

Some of the social groups on here behave like cults and I don't think people acknowledge it enough.

[shadowwolfmemes]

My blog is NOT a safe place for proshippers!!!

Hopefully, I won't have to repeat myself after this. If you're a proshipper/darkshipper and you come across my blog, make a graceful U-turn and simply GO FUCK YOURSELF!

I don't give a rat's rotting ass if you don't support pro-contact, I still cannot confide in people like you. Here's another thing that I don't understand about y'all. How are you going to call yourself 'anti-harassment' or complain that antis "harass" you, but then go around and interact with antis all willy-nilly to try to persuade them that they're in the wrong?

And no, most antis don't go out of their way to harass you. They mostly block the people they dislike so that the proshippers don't get the chance to interact. The ones that do interact with the people they dislike are just wasting their own time. I suggest that you don't waste your time with them either.

I hate proshippers, but I don't waste my time trying to convince y'all that what you're doing is wrong. That one time I had to interact is when I asked one of my followers if they're a proshipper or not (they were, so I blocked them). Call me a "bad person" for doing that if you like, I will stand by with what I did and I'm not actually sorry for blocking them. :)

Here are some examples of the most popular dogshit excuses they use to try to make themselves look as innocent as possible.

Excuse #1: "They're not real, so why does it bother you?"

It doesn't matter that the characters are fictional, it's still disgusting that people like you glorify illegal material like incest, pedophilia, abuser x victim, child porn, etc.

Excuse #2: "Fiction doesn't affect reality. It can't hurt you."

While it's true to some certain extent, the way it's used in this argument makes it worse. Again, it doesn't give you the excuse to worship pedophilia and other problematic ships that shouldn't be normalized. Fiction or not, some things shouldn't be shared at all.

Excuse #3: "This is just my coping mechanism."

I'm sorry, but this is one of thee most shittiest excuses I've ever heard in my life! In fact, the term 'excuse' is too kind for this. What's another word to describe this bullshit? Glorifying problematic ships is not a healthy way of coping. Why? Because you're manipulating your brain into thinking that whatever traumatic experience you went through should be romanticized. No normal person would do that to themselves and justify it.

Excuse #4: "If you don't like it, just block them."

I do. Like I previously said, I don't waste my time on these people. I want them to stay as far away from me as possible as much as I stay away from them. However, fantasies the proshippers have shouldn't be shared as a normal factor. It's okay to write about dark topics, what's NOT okay is romanticizing/normalizing it.

Before I close this off, I want to say that all of this applies to radqueers, too. Y'all are not slick, you're just as bad as proshippers!

Does this post offend you, proshippers? If it does, good! Y'all are NOT welcomed in my blog whatsoever and I will do anything in my power to make sure you don't get an opportunity to interact with me.

I'll say it one more damn time;

MY BLOG IS NOT A SAFE PLACE FOR PROSHIPPERS AND IT NEVER WILL. ANY PROSHIPPER/RADQUEER THAT INTERACTS WILL BE BLOCKED ON THE DOT.

GO CRY ME A RIVER, MOTHERFUCKERS! BOO-FUCKING-HOO! (This is directed towards the proshippers and radqueers).

[proshrimp]

📌PINNED📌

( Ver 1.4 )

For nicknames feel free to call me Shrimp or Shrimpy

Adult, Queer, Neurodivergent & pretty done with fanpol ableism 😒

My only DNI includes Radqueers/TransXs, "IRL kiddos" or supporters

(But perhaps be clever enough not to interact with me if I'm in your DNI.)

My beliefs under the cut !

Fiction (on all aspects, dark or light) is ment to be explored, many if not most humans are practically hard wired to wonder about unrealistic and fantastical schenarios, and that can express itself in ways such as anxiety, daydreaming, writing, drawing, singing and many subtypes of the previously mentioned. Yes, this means I'm pro-ship/pro-fiction. ("Pro" is a suffix used to indicate you are in support of something, in this case, right to ship or right of exploring fiction.)

I believe that harrasment, especially that done trough online, is cruel and has no end goal nor benefit. If a user is breaking the rules of the site they use, report it to the site. If a user is committing a crime that poses harm to another person, animal, the enviroment or anothers belongingsa, report it to the authorities.

Radqueer is largely harmful, I could write practically 3 books on how their morals lead and have led to real people being harmed, how their terminology is non-equivalent to what they claim it to be equivalnt to- and so much more, but frankly that rant would go on for too long.

People have rights to their own bodies, do whatever you want with it, tattoos, abortion, whatever you wanna do with your own body that doesn't touch on others? Go ahead. Now there is exceptions as always, im against "transrace" "transition"s, tattooing hate speech/symbols onto oneself, or carving the names of non-consenting individuals into your body- especially if its (knowingly OR unknowingly) to manipulate them, that and similiar stuff.

Endogenic systems are entirely valid, wether their system exists for neurological reasons or spiritual, it is a highly reported experience people have and to dismiss that is odd to say the least.

Slurs should be reclaimed if they can't fade away, queer is a good example of a slur that almost completely has been turned into just a word anyone can say without meaning anything cruel with it. Those reclaiming it should be the victims of it BUT once the word HAS been desentesized enough anyone should be able to say it to further erase it's association with being a slur. (To reclaim is to use a slur to empower one-self or casualize it with a gentle new context, if one is using it as an insult themself or another, regardless of their own history with the word, they are not reclaiming it.)

Generative AI is bad, especially art, music and voice AI, as they utilize content from non-consenting creators as well as steal jobs away from real people. (And in this economy it's really dangerous) I DO however support character AIs because they have saved lives, and do not steal from creators, only copy human speech patterns. This said real human connection is always better for you but I won't consider it immoral or wrong in any way if you do befriend AI chatbots.

If you censor serious topics and words when there is no need to, you should not be taken seriously no matter what argument you run, if you censor the words pedophile, groomer, child predator, rapist, molest(and so much more words) then I believe that no one should consider you mature enough to accept your debate or debate with you.

TBA

[the-alarm-system]

[TEXT ID: Title is Nurturing Personhood in The System Based on our experiences by @the-alarm-system .

1.Person Language

Identifying and labeling those within the system as their own people using word choice can greatly impact personhood and give a stronger sense of self to each and every headmate. Examples of person language over parts language is using headmate over alter, person over part, and other examples of this. It is also fun to personalize and discuss these desires with others.

Language examples:

-headmate>alter

-using we when discussing system agreements with outsiders(if safe)

-person>piece or part

2.Trust

Trust your headmates and your systemhood, fakeclaiming yourself can cause headmates to be upset and is also very dehumanizing. Trust their existence, respect their existence. Also realize trust your headmates in reference to the body, it is theirs as much as it is yours.

3.Discussing fronting times

In our experience, it’s good to ask those who enjoy fronting on when they would like to front or keep the internal door open to allow them to front when desired. This nurtures independence and personhood.

4.Personbased respect

This includes allowing them to make their own decisions if possible, even if you don’t personally agree with them and as long as they stay within system rules and hurt nobody. Another form of system personbased respect is respecting anothers items and asking before using them.

5.Talk to them like a friend

Speak to your headmates the way you would to a friend, ask how their day was, asl their opinions on things, have group conversations and see how diverse you all really are.

at the bottom in small text it says anti endos and radqueers do not touch. END ID]

[dogs-have-fallen]

ok wait so what IS transspecies bc i feel like i've never heard anyone actually use that one in good faith before

omg i LOVE this question !!!!

in a simplified manner , transspecies is an identity someone can claim if they have or want to transition to their theriotype , via medical or social transitioning . an example of each is body modifications like fangs , tattoos , implants etc , and for social it can be really anything ! it’s about how you portray yourself , for some it’s wearing gear all the time (remember that a lot of therians gear a lot , so this isn’t transspecies exclusive) , or overall socially presenting as your theriotype (ex: my friends refer to me as a coydog , that’s a form of social transition) . i’m going to cover a bit more on medical transitions in the next paragraph .

now, there’s a lot of controversy with the label but it’s mainly from people who are uneducated on the subject . there’s the “it’s harmful to transgender people” agenda which can be true , there is a small minority of people who troll under the label (similar to early kinblr days , a lot of what you’ll find in the older “otherkin cringe” vids are mostly trolls) , but it’s a separate identity that happens to use similar terminology . along with this argument, many claim that because medical transition is impossible , that it’s a mockery of trans people . the counter point is that even if some forms of medical transition don’t exist (ex “hrt that turns you into [insert animal]”) , the desire is still there .

there’s also the argument that it was made by radqueers and transID people , which simply isn’t true . the link below will go through a lot of mentions of the transspecies label prior to the mention of it in radqueer spaces .

here’s another link that talks about what transspecies is beyond what i’ve described !

i hope this helps !! thank you so much for your ask 🤍🤍

[xparalynx]

The thing about Radqueer

I want to share my stance on Radqueer and the topics connected to it.

I believe that any identity that doesn’t cause harm is valid. This differs from the Radqueer stance of “good faith identities.” I don’t think it’s right to hate on Radqueers or transids because I genuinely believe most don’t intend to cause harm, but the reality is that some of the radqueers do with how they comunicate and name certain things and I’d like to explain how.

When it comes to concepts like "transabled," I don’t think feeling a disconnect between how you experience yourself and how you physically are is inherently bad, not at all.

However, the issue lies in labeling these experiences as "trans." People who identify as "transabled" often say they feel like they were supposed to be disabled. This is controversial because it can dismiss or trivialize the struggles disabled people face. I do believe there’s a way to describe and express these feelings without causing harm, but calling it “transabled” is not that way. I also believe that those who call themselves "transabled" experience some kind of struggles and should be supported to feel comfortable in non harmful ways.

Same goes for the concept of "transracial." There is nothing inherent in our identities that ties us to a specific ethnicity. Ethnicity is primarily based on physical characteristics, and when we place too much emphasis on these features, we risk perpetuating harmful stereotypes and racism. While it's important to acknowledge ethnic identities and the concept of race in order to combat racism and address historical inequalities, the idea of "transracial" suggests that ethnicity is a definite and personal identity in the same way that gender identity is. This isn't the case.

It’s absolutely okay to feel a connection to a culture outside of the one you grew up in. It’s also okay to wish you looked different or identify with aspects of a culture that isn't your own. However, these experiences should not be conflated with being "transracial." Being trans is about being a gender different from what you were assigned at birth, whereas ethnicity is tied to ancestral and cultural heritage, which cannot be different in the same way.

Beyond that, calling a feeling of wanting or believing you were meant to be something you are not “trans” is transphobic. Trans people don’t feel like they were “supposed” to be another gender, they ARE that gender. Many transid identities reduce conditions that aren’t social constructs to being solely identity-based, they are not.

I believe it’s fine to feel this kind of disconnection, and even dysphoria, and I don’t think we should police identities. However, it’s crucial to be mindful of how we name, communicate, and express certain identities, especially when they intersect with marginalized experiences.

I do believe that the feelings behind these identities are real. I support these feelings and identities, but I do not support the terms used in radqueer spaces to describe them. They misunderstand and misuse what being transgender is and dismiss the lived experiences of disabled people, racial minorities, and age-based struggles. Language matters, and using "trans-" in these contexts is both harmful and misleading. Being transgender is not about transitioning to something, being meant to be something, or relating to something, it is who you are.

I know that dysphoria can be more than gender dysphoria, I know things like age dysphoria exist and they definately are valid but having dysphoria is not the same as being trans, those are two different things. These feelings are valid, but the words used to describe them should not invalidate or appropriate marginalized identities. There are already alternative terms that avoid harm. For example, "Chronosian" describes the experience some "transage" individuals feel without misusing the term "trans." Finding new, respectful language is possible, and I think it’s an important step forward.

Another topic is being alterhuman or nonhuman. I fully support any alterhuman and nonhuman identities I myself am alterhuman, I know species dysphoria and phantom limbs are real as I do experience them myself. I don't think that alterhumanity itself is LGBTQIA+ but I do believe they belong to pride since I view pride as more than LGBTQIA+ pride but more on that later.

Now about paraphilias. As my username implies and my bio shows I am an anti-abuse paraphilic, I coined the term anti-abuse and it is linked here. Paraphilias are not something a person chooses, and simply having one does not make someone a bad person. However, what truly matters is how a person acts on their paraphilia.

For example, it is a wrong but widely spread stand that all pedophiles are monsters, which isn't true. They did not ask for or choose their attraction, what does matter is how they handle their attraction. It is never okay to engage with children on a sexual level because they don't understand the full meaning and consequences of sexuality plus adults have a certain power over kids which makes that an unhealthy power dynamic, either way: children can't consent. But many people with minor-related paraphilias hate themselves for their attraction, struggling with deep shame, depression, or even suicidal thoughts because on the one side they know that acting on their attraction would cause harm and on the other side society calling them predators and monsters for just having attraction they didn't ask for. I believe that, as a society, we should work on destigmatizing paraphilias themselves while maintaining clear boundaries that acting in ways that cause harm is unacceptable. People cannot control what they are attracted to, but they can control their actions.

Currently, the term "pedophilia" is often used as a catch-all for attraction to minors, but technically, it refers only to prepubescent children. Other terms like Infantophilia (attraction towards babies), Nepiophilia (attraction towards toddlers), hebephilia (attraction to early pubescent minors) and ephebophilia (attraction to mid-to-late adolescents) exist, but there isn't a widely used neutral term to describe all paraphilias related to minors. Because of this, I propose the term "minophilia" (I will maybe make a seperate post about it and if I did I will link it here) as an umbrella term to describe these attractions in a neutral way since the connotations of "MAP" can be seen as wanting to get rid of the paraphilia label or even glorifying attraction towards minors. Rather than doing that Paraphilias should be destigmatised and there should be a lot mor of education, we need to have open, informed discussions about these topics to prevent harm rather than driving people into isolation and self-hatred. Education and support for non-abusive individuals can reduce risks and help ensure that no one is harmed.

Paraphilias should not be included under LGBTQIA+, however they should be recognised as a marginalised group and do belong (under certain conditions) at pride in the same way as kink belongs at pride.

In conclusion, my stance is that we should focus on supporting people with non-harmful identities and attractions, while also making it clear that harmful behaviors, such as abusing or exploiting others, trivializing others struggles or misu´sing certain language in ways that cause harm, are never acceptable. Destigmatizing these topics and creating open, empathetic conversations is essential for promoting education, understanding, and mental well-being. Let’s work together to build a society that addresses these sensitive issues with care and responsibility, while ensuring the safety and dignity of all people. The "Radqueer" movement is not the answer. It is an attempt to talk about real experiences but does so in a way that causes mor harm than good.

I am open to any opinion and I will read all answers. I hope what I wrote is clear and doesn't offend anyone but rather gives a new perspective on how names and actions affect others.

[thepatchworksys]

ppl be normal about alters having different opinions from the rest of the sysyem. harmful ones. radqueers, bigots, pedos. whatever! the system cant control that. no it doesnt reflect on the rest of the system. and most of all its not weird or uncommon.

But hey, you might ask: why? why would your mind form a racist alter?

its a good question! the brain tries to help us cope in a lot of weird ways. An alter can form as a stress response, its the brains way of "helping". But it can be bad help because the brain is far from perfect.

Heres an example: Jamie has did, she is having intrusive thoughts about sexual assault. its horrid and she cant deal with this anymore! -> brain splits to cope -> this new alter has thoughts of sexual assault and enjoys those thoughts and fantasies. the new alter doesnt believe sexual assault is wrong, so they can handle the thoughts- unlike jamie, who was disgusted and horrified.

Another example: Silas is gay, but he is having a hard time coping. His parents dont accept him. -> brain splits to cope -> this new alter is very homophobic. they try to convince silas to renounce being gay, so he can become straight and not struggle as much. They also agree with the systems parents when they front, negating conflict.

Another nother example: Lucy is healing from her trauma, she grew up in a cult and has osdd. However, she feels deeply uneasy - her new life is safe but different and unfamiliar. She is deeply homesick and feels guilt for it. -> brain splits to cope -> Lucys new alter is a cultist. They become a xenosatanist and join a "faux online cult" in the radqueer community. It feels comfortable and familiar to be in a 'cult' again.

Those are 3 examples of alters forming with harmful mindsets. Traumagenic alters form as a result of trauma as a way to cope- But that doesnt mean the coping mechanism is healthy.

As well as this, alters are identities. You may view your alters as their own people or as parts of 1 people, but either way alters are identities based around personalities, traits, and opinions. Just like any singlet, they will pick up their own opinions which might be harmful, because they have their own identity!

Example: Julia and Yuki are a system of two. Julia is very pro trans! However, Yuki has started spending some time on reddit and has been exposed to TERF ideals. Yuki is convinced and agrees with them, because like anybody, Yukis opinions can change and be swayed by her environment. Julia is upset and disagrees, but the terf mindset aligns with Yukis morals so she believes it.

Its not Julias fault that Yuki expressed autonomy and free will. Yuki's mind was changed by an outside force and Julia couldnt control that. The only thing Julia can do is try to convince Yuki otherwise but she cant force it.

This isnt to say its ok to have/act on these beliefs- im just saying that it is not a moral failing of the system to have a harmful or bigoted alter, and there are tons of valid reasons why. So please please be nice to your sys friends. Their alters harmful opinion doesnt mean the whole system shares it. The sys is probably doing their best, you just have to support them along the way.

[car-coins]

AHARQ-TransID: A term strictly separating those with harmless and good-faith TransIDs from radqueers and those with harmful TransIDs.

["AHARQ" stands for "Anti-harmful (transids); anti-radqueer."]

(More vital information and flag symbolism below.)

AHARQ-TransIDs are anti-radqueer, anti-harmful TransIDs (such as transrace, transabled, transabuse, etc.). They are pro-good faith identities and pro-healthy transition if and when applicable.

Examples of AHARQ-TransIDs may include identities like AHARQ-TransHaircolor, AHARQ-TransBlueblood, or AHARQ-TransWings.

Examples of healthy transitioning may include an AHARQ-Transnational moving to another country, an AHARQ-Transhaircolored dying their hair, or an AHARQ-Transeyecolored wearing contact lenses.

One may have an AHARQ-TransID for many reasons, including (but not limited to) easing atypical dysphoria, seeking comfort or relief through labels, experiencing euphoria from collecting labels, or feeling that they ought to be a certain way.

Traditionally harmful TransIDs that have been reclaimed under good faith, such as being Transabled due to BIID or Transracial due to being adopted into a family of a different race, are welcome to use this label as well as long as they are AHARQ.

AHARQ-TransIDs trust in their users to apply their personal perception of themselves and healthy, good-faith based motives to identify under and transition to them.

It is encouraged that anyone using this identity makes it publically clear that they are anti-radqueer and anti-harmful TransID.

Radqueers or supporters of harmful TransIDs who also have a harmless TransID may not call this identity an AHARQ-TransID, as the term is specifically against their belief system.

The term "AHARQ-TransID" should always be hyphenated. This is because AHARQ beliefs should never be separated from an AHARQ-TransID. Another reason is because when the term "TransID" is searched, AHARQ-TransIDs will not be grouped along with them in the search results.

The symbolism of the flag is shown below:

(Blank versions)

[ratinacoat]

Throwing my 2 cents into the radqueer discourse because I haven't seen this mentioned. For context, I've been aware of it prior to anti radqueer blogs popping up due to a server I was in had a blocklist channel for them. A lot of minors I notice are in the community and it feels similar in terms of the MOGAI community (i.e coining terms for stuff they experience, the communities themselves are two different vibes). From my pov, it feels like traumacore blogs meeting MOGAI coining in terms of the posts. Some posts are connected to "wanting" xyz disorder, "cis" terms relating to those who bodily have it, etc.

It feels like a majority of the community may deal with denial, internalized ableism, isolation, and/or trauma symptoms. For example, transplural may NOT be tied to the situation of faking having a disorder. They maybe a system but are in denial due to "not fitting" the criteria (their symptoms maybe unrealized/suppressed). There's also transseverity which is when you "want a disorder to be worse" which again could be tied to trauma symptoms (i.e wanting worse trauma to be valid). Obviously, it doesn't excuse the whole harmful terms but considering most I see are minors, they may not realize what they're doing plus the aspect of them being groomed or undergoing CSA.

This is something I've observed partially in radqueer communities too. The reason is going to vary person to person, there is no reason that will apply to 100% of the radqueer community but I think this is a big one for quite a few people. I'm gunna go in depth on my own observations/theory as well because I love rambling about this stuff.

This is going to be a long rant, TW for neglect mentions.

Many transID people I've seen or talked to do it for other reasons too. Another big one is desperately wanting the attention, the sympathy, pity, and assistance that certain people get, such as those with visible physical disabilities (amputees, wheelchair users, etc). They don't see the discrimination those people get, they don't understand first hand that ableism is such a big problem. They don't understand that the person is actually struggling. Instead they see how much attention they get and feel like they want that. This is common in people who have experienced neglect and those with some kind of disorder.

As a personal example, I have BPD and NPD. As a young child (throughout elementary school, so around the ages of 6-12) there were times I envied people who got injured. Every year there was always that one kid who fell off the playgrounds and broke their arm. When I was a kid I wanted that to happen. I wanted the sympathy, the attention, and the pity that the other kid was getting because I didn't get that attention from the people who should have given it to me. Part of me knew it was wrong but another part didn't care. I didn't understand how much pain the other person would have been in, all I saw was how people adored them, felt bad for them, cared for them, etc. As I got older I realized this was wrong, I got help in middle school-high school and now I don't have this problem, or at least it's not as intense as it used to be. Obviously there's still the little voice going "Don't you wish that were you?" but therapy was able to help lessen the severity of that.

I was lucky to get therapy for it so young and get diagnosed with these disorders as a teen. Not everyone has that ability, and when the internet is in your ear telling you it's normal and it's okay to feel like you should be the victim of something, it doesn't help. People going through neglect or any abuse likely don't have a good connection with their parents and spend more time searching for communities online. Finally finding one where they feel they belong, such as transID communities, feels relieving. At the same time though, the feeling of finally being understood and the radical acceptance is discouraging them from seeking help and telling them that anyone who thinks it's not okay to envy survivors/disabled people is just a horrible person.

Uhh tldr; The constant feeling of wanting attention/sympathy that survivors/disabled folk get isn't normal and radqueer/transID communities encouraging it are why these kids aren't getting help for something that is probably a disorder.

(Don't use this to self diagnose BPD or NPD. Anytime I tell this story someone asks if it means they have BPD or NPD. No, it doesn't. There are other things that cause it too.)

[recovering-radqueers]

"Recovering Radqueer" using transabled and transharm

Anonymous sent: I'm a "recovering radqueer" but I still use transIDs, even the "harmful" ones like transabled and transharmed/ful. They're the only words that meaningfully describe my experience. The anti-transition stance of Dissomei just doesn't work for me when I fully intend to remove an eye and I know nobody in that community would approve. I want to get away from the radqueer community but they are the only ones who will accept me. Every anti-radqueer blog I talk to just spits slurs and tells me to kill myself over my identity. Do you have any advice? Other labels that aren't anti-transition? Blogs that are pro-transID but anti radqueer that I can interact with to separate myself from all the abusers in the RQC?

Hey there, I'm sorry to hear that you've been told to kill yourself. I don't believe anyone deserves that and that's not fair to you.

I can absolutely understand wanting to still use transIDs, and the reasons you gave definitely are common. It sounds like you have some serious intentions, and while obviously I don't want anyone to harm themselves in general, I do also acknowledge that serious dysphoria makes it feel unavoidable. It reminds me a lot, in fact, of people with BID who have performed self amputation. At the end of the day, everyone deserves a chance to be happy - so don't worry, no judgement on that end.

Whether or not your wants/needs are understood by others, it’s important to honor that you’re experiencing something very real that makes you feel connected to these identities. The language you use to describe your experience doesn’t have to come from a bigoted/harmful place. It does suck, though, when it feels like there aren't exactly the right words to describe your identity. :(

Identity-wise:

Some people do genuinely use "transabled" in a 100% good-faith, non-radqueer-associated way. As far as I'm aware, this originated in the BID community, so if it's possible you may fit that disorder's criteria, you could switch to identifying as that. A 100% good-faith, non-radqueer-associated way transabled person. There's even a pride flag for this by antiradqueer if you like.

I recently heard of the term "dysfirming" to be a substitute for "transitioning" that applies to some atypical dysphoria-influenced identities. I don't know if this would be a helpful term?

I would suggest looking into communities focused on body mods, body autonomy, trauma recovery, and identity exploration. Find forums, Discords, Subreddits, etc, and see if it's a space you can vibe with. I think you could potentially find some people who think similarly to you. If you want me to specifically look and link you to some places, feel free to send another ask.

Dissomei as a term actually isn't anti transition! You can see a couple of quotes from the creator on this page, and one mentions that even amputations are accepted. Of course, it'll always be up to you what term you want to use.

Desirdae (Coining post)

Sensus (Coining post)

If you can do some introspection and try to pin down why you identify as any transharmful labels, it might be helpful. For example, if you wanted people to see you as dangerous, maybe a presentation label related to danger/violence, or perspesque (coining post). If it's paraphila-related, maybe Paraphikitós/Paramenos (coining post).

Intenxper (Coining post)

-vior (Coining post)

Archetrope (Tag)

Neurowiry (Coining post)

Enviren (Coining post)

Also general tips:

Find a therapist if you haven't already. I know, you've probably heard "get therapy!!!" a lot, haha, but I don't mean "get into therapy so they can make you stop identifying the way that you do". A truly good therapist would be someone you can trust to talk about how you feel and that includes being transID. And they could also direct you to any local IRL groups that might be good places to hang out!

Phew, sorry my response was so long! Whatever you decide to do, I wish you good luck! Please feel free to send another ask for follow-ups, specific advice, or just to say hi, okay?

-Mod Ally🍄

[rab1darachn1d]

INTRO💥💥💥

Name: Ozzie/Sunday/Kafka + anyname from my url

Pronouns: he/they pref but idrc

Agender, bi, aroace spectrum

TVhead robotkin and spiderkin💥💥💥

Special interests are spiders(specifically tarantulas) and psychology

Dyslexic!!! Sorry for spelling mistakes/reading stuff wrong and please don't use super small or hard to read fonts when talking directly to me!!! Typing quirks are fine but if you can control them or add translations thats greatly appreciated

MINOR!!! idc if ur over 18 and interact or if we are mutuals but dont be weird please I will just block you

WE STAND WITH PALESTINE🇵🇸🍉

(@remindertoclick <- DO YOUR DAILY CLICKS OR I'LL THROW ROCKS AT YOU)

@mechcanicalmadness MY BESTESTFRIEND AND COOLEST DAD EVER ALSO GUY WHO MADE THE FIRST 2 ARTS BELOW 💥💥💥

@absolutelymadoka IS MY MAGICAL GIRL DAUGHTER !!!! THEY ARE THE SILLIEST AND NICEST EVER BE NICE TO THEM

I help with the @bungostraycreatures gimick blog acc go look at it its run by my bestest friend :3

@sundazeing is my icons/npt/moodboard blog!!! Requests are always open, read the rules and dni if u you have anything you want me to make B)

@queenofthecafe is my Lucy bsd rp blog >::)

(user box made by @/absolutelymadoka)

♤♡◇♧♤♡◇♧♤♡◇♧♤♡◇♧♤♡◇♧

WARNINGS /BFYI / FOR MOOTS*****

-I type in caps a lot

-Im not very good a tw tagging things tho I try my best !!! If you get triggered by anything I post/rb lmk and I'll tag it

-I swear a lot !!! Like way too much !!! I do not give a damn abt slurs AS LONG AS YOU CAN CLAIM THEM !!! IF I FIND OUT YOU USE SLURS YOU CANNOT CLAIM I'LL CALL YOU A BIGOT AND BLOCK YOU

-Anything suggestive is a joke and do NOT make jokes like that to me if we are not friends I will call you a freak

-I like to give people nicknames/ shorten people's names(mainly if ppl have a long ass name/url and it fucks me up tryna type it) but if that bothers you lmk

-Not good with tone so I use tone tags, you aren't forced to use them but if you'd like it'd make communication easier

-I have a bad habit of randomly disappearing for a few days for whatever reason, so if I accidentally ignore you sorry, please don't take it personal

-If you are a shithead to my mutuals I will be a shithead towards you <3 also blocked <3

-DMS ARE OPEN !!! FEEL FREE TO TALKS/RANT/VENT ABT WHATEVER !!! however I'm not very good at socializing and if I seem rude, standoffish or awkward I'm so sorry💀💀💀

♤♡◇♧♤♡◇♧♤♡◇♧♤♡◇♧♤♡◇♧

SYSTEM THINGS*****

-i am the host and this is my acc though they post shit on here too

-their posts will be tagged with ***postinghours(sakepostinghours for an example)

-I love answering questions!!! However I am not a medical professional and I cannot diagnose you or speak for other systems!!!

-^ Don't ask abt triggers, alter roles or trauma I will ignore you or call you a dumbass nosey weirdo

-fictive heavy(dont be weird about them or theyll block you and idk probably call you a freak)

-^ don't bring up source trauma unless they make jokes about it first OR if they are friends with you

-^ First to treat any of them like a fictional character gets their limbs ripped off<33

-if ur another fictive theyd like to say hi but dont be weird and understand they might see you differently then how you remember them

-if you say "Can *** stop fronting/can you switch with ***" I will throw rocks at you and you will get blocked

-^ if u wanna talk to someone or have a message for someone we are happy to tell them

♤♡◇♧♤♡◇♧♤♡◇♧♤♡◇♧♤♡◇♧

DNI*****

-basic dni(homo+transphobe, racists)

-"radqueers" and "transids"

-Proshippers and zoophiles(YALL R FUCKING NASTY GO AWAY)

-"radfems" and "terfs" (fuck you go away)

-Pro Israel mfs

-Endos/Tulpas/Willows/Mixed Origin, we will not participate in any syscourse but yall make me uncomfy

-^supporters of those

-"*** personality disorders are absuive" go away die go shoo get OUT(ily people with personality disorders)

-people who are against others with "scary" disorders fuck off you aren't helpful

-pro ed/"thinspo" mfs... wth are yall doing

-NSFW ONLY blogs (nothing against yall but im a minor)

-people who are shitty towards therians, otherkins, xenogenders, etc

♤♡◇♧♤♡◇♧♤♡◇♧♤♡◇♧♤♡◇♧

FANDOMS + FAVORITE CHARACTERS*****

Bungo Stray Dogs(Dazai, Verlaine, Fyodor and Lucy) is my main fandom and hyperfixation BUT here are some other fandoms of mine I still like

☆ = I still actively look at/take part in

♡ = not as active but I will scream abt if given the opportunity

♤ = I like it but I'm not updated with the fandom

favorite characters r not in order

-Jujusitu Kaisen(Gojo , Megumi , Itadori and Sukuna)☆

-Deadplate(Vincent) ♡

-Genshin Impact(Baizhu, Xiao, Diluc, Childe and Dottore) ☆♡

-Honkai: StarRail(Boothill, Sunday, Clara, Sparkle, Natasha and Aventurine) ☆

-Hollow Knight(Grimm and Quirrel) ♡

-Pokemon(EMMET AND INGO💥💥💥)(Also Galvantula, Reshiram, Gallipede and Eternatus) ♡

-Madness Combat(Deimos and 2BDAMNED) ♤

-Guilty Gear(Robo-Ky, Zato, Chipp, Ky and Happy Chaos) ♤

-Wuthering Waves(Scar and Lingyang) ♤

-Cookie Run(Espresso Cookie, Red Velvet Cookie and Rougefort Cookie) ♡

-RWBY(Qrow, Phyrra, Blake and Emmerald) ♡

-Project Sekai(Rui and Shizuku)♤

-Castle Crashers(Blacksmith)♤

-No Straight Roads(Neon J)♤

-The Property of Hate(RGB)♡♤

-Stardew Valley(Sebastian, Sam and Hailey)♤

-Omori(Captain Space Boyfriend, Hero and Kel)♡♤

-Howl's Moving Castle(Howl, Calcifer and Markl)♡

-Ponyo(Fujimoto)♡♤

-Punishment Gray Raven(Wanshi)♤

-Danganrompa(Kokichi , Keebo , Gonta , Nagito , Miu and Celestia)♤

theres others but those r irrelevant we dont talk abt the dark ages

♤♡◇♧♤♡◇♧♤♡◇♧♤♡◇♧♤♡◇♧

[scarlet97531]

⭕️❗️okay I gotta say something because this has wormed itself into my brain and I will not be able to sleep if I don’t talk about it

I think the issues and hate surrounding the radqueer community mostly come from a confusion between “all identities are valid” and “all behaviour (related to valid identities) is valid”

Like for example, the difference between identifying as transharmful(I also have thoughts about this transx format but that’s a different conversation), and wanting to “transition” by harming someone. I, as a killer sans fictive, could be considered transharmful because of my pseudo memories of harming people, and I don’t think it’s bad to see that as a fully valid part of my identity. But obviously the behaviour of harming someone else to try to turn that internal experience into an external one should never be encouraged.

(This is one reason I think the transx format for these labels isn’t great, because the word trans is obviously strongly associated with transgender people which is an issue because physical transition is often necessary for transgender people’s health, whereas physical transition for most trans ids is not a realistic or healthy goal. Of course there is also social transition, but generally when people hear transition they think of physical transition. It would be better to use different terminology that doesn’t have those associations, similarly to how therian and otherkin communities have their own terminology even though their experiences can be similar.)

I think the radqueer community’s trash reputation is probably the result of a lot of trolls pretending to genuinely be radqueer supporting horrible things, misguided people who have genuinely good intentions but the way they approach or present things is bad and/or makes them look really bad, and then people with good intentions and a good approach that don’t get talked about because they are inoffensive and outsiders just want drama.

I think there’s a lot of young and neurodivergent people in both of the more genuine catagories, and that probably contributes to these issues.

Overall I think the radqueer community is a “good idea, bad execution” kind of thing. I think there are ways to do “all good faith identities are valid” right, but between the bad reputation and the many issues within the community itself(again, I think mostly the identities vs identities and behaviours thing), I don’t think the term “radqueer” is really viable anymore and it’s probably best for people with genuine intentions to find similar terms and communities that don’t have those issues.

This is all based on what I’ve seen on Tumblr in like.. the last two months or so (we literally never heard of radqueer before we started using Tumblr more recently) of seeing “radqueers dni” in 90% of ppls intros and having no idea why. So we looked up definitions, tried to look at the actual radqueer community, and arguments for and against a bunch of radqueer related stuff. We are absolutely not an expert on this stuff, this is just the little scraps we’ve finally started piecing together to start to maybe understand some of this. There’s a good chance we’re totally wrong, and we’re open to being corrected on stuff.

I also wanna add another note here though, I think the hate towards radqueers is massively disproportionate. From what I’ve seen the radqueer community is really small, and 90% of the posts I’ve seen related to it are just coining posts for obscure terms. Not exactly something I would think would be worth being so well known and so intensely hated. We all know the internet has weird stuff on it, I don’t know why this particular category of weird is considered so much more important than the others.

Damnit this is way longer than it was supposed to be. I’m just gonna stop here and try to sleep now. I jumped around a lot while writing this so there might be a lot of mistakes and confusing stuff.. yeah I’m just gonna try to sleep though.

[wolfertinger]

another ask post spam. answering in one post to keep important info up front.

i havent seen him publicly claim this. but i have seen a lot of radqueers feel comfortable interacting with and identifying in his art. one such user was highlighted but i have no way of proving salem even know they exist.

however i would make a point of publicly denouncing any pedophiles and zoophiles that reblogged me, because thats dangerous. if you allow one nazi into your bar you now have a nazi bar. i do find it weird how when ever people accidentally misgender or are weird about his trans characters he immediately publicly lashes them but these people somehow "arent noticed".

his partner wis has been claiming so on "x"/twitter on his behalf after he Deleted Fucking Everything when people recognized who he was on twitter. he indeed does claim he had "racial delusions" which is a really interesting way of shifting the blame from actually being racist. you can even see here he immediately softens the blow, of saying he was being racist by immediately claiming to also be harassed. while not making the mental fucking correlation people will harass racist people for being racists. nope he is always the victim in every scenario and he never instigates any of the treatment towards him, ever.

and yes he did really try to come back to twitter, only to run at the first drop of critisism.

this is also the most major concern in my eyes because this is the exact behavior he exhibited on puppychan. he genuinely became obsessed with attention and praise and in my eyes hes doing it again. especially with how often he makes posts that hit every buzzword you can think of. i think you can, and should be proud of your racial identity your sexuality your gender and your disability, but theres a point where it very clearly becomes more about saying the right things, rather than doing them.

im not and never did say he never draws fat people but theres a noticeable difference between the body types he consistently draws (that gets him the most attention) and what he draws once or twice for attention than drops. im just saying he constantly mentions wanting to make characters with disabilities cellulite stretch marks, so on, but never actually develops these characters beyond 1-2 personality traits and horny posts. bc thats all he cares about. those are good examples but one of those characters belongs to a different person entirely. the cerberus's weight also seems to fluctuate, and once again i dont see any characters that are fat beyond whats "cute" "sexy" """acceptable""" chubby.

hi wis!

[roxanneslosteyes]

Full DNI

Tw for brief mentions of heavily topics (p3d0philia, incest, abuse, SA/sexual abuse, rape and human trafficking)

warning for minor mentions of Proshippers/proships since people like me are uncomfortable with Proshippers/Proships or they are uncomfortable with shipping discourse (that's what people call it to my knowledge).

So if you are uncomfortable with these topics I highly suggest to not look at this post or at least wait if you are in good mindset to read it

Side note: There are no fandoms {besides like one due to the nature the type of media is} nor harmless ships on this dni list because if there any media or harmless ship I don't like is normally blacklisted by now. This dni don't really have tags for those types of people. And the ones that do have tags don't really use them sometimes so they can still interact with my account when I don't want them too.

(BIG NOTE: If I mention Fetishisation or fetishize. It's in not in the context with Fetishes. Fetishisation in this context means treating group of individuals mostly minority groups as sex objects or even heavy topics as sexual "fantasy". This type of heavy Fetishisation isn't done by survivors as a coping mechanism but by people who aren't survivors and it's very harmful. For example, if someone has a rape fetish, it fuels the rape culture beliefs, that's one of the ways Fetishisation of heavy topics can be harmful.)

Proshippers/Comshippers/Darkshippers (Whatever those types of "shippers" are now called, these shippers fetishizes heavily topics in ships like abuse, incest, etc. Also some Darkshippers still use proshipper term so that's why I added it here)

(In the original context of term proship and comship was originally pretty harmless. Comship was originally made for ships that were complexed like Goddess/God x human, vampire x human, Vampire x werewolf, etc. However the fetishes changed their name by stealing another shipper name which complicated things this is the same for proship which was originally meant supporters of ships (which was harmless and not fetishizing heavily topics) until those fetishizers stole the term and completely changing the original meaning.) (And the fact proship/darkship/comship community has alot of adults who are groomers too and has groomed minors into being proshippers/Darkshippers so yeah the community is just a safe place for online child sexual predators or child predators or Darkshippers/proshippers are child predators/Sexual child predators themselves but dont want to admit it) (side Note 1: Darkshippers still use proship/proshippers and still use comship/comshippers even though users are trying to get these terms BACK to their original meaning so that's why they are on the list) (side note 2:I have blacklisted the tags for proshippers/Darkshippers/Comshippers so I won't see them but sometimes they won't use the tags for some reason. I had a Darkshipper's artwork on my fyp of a fandom I love and a meme with two characters from the fandom I love. I reblogged it but didn't know they were a darkshipper until I looked back and saw a tag saying they are a Darkshipper. I did unreblog and unlike it and blocked them.)

(Another reason: They also disrespect creators boundaries so add Proshippers/dark shippers community being a safe place for sexual harassers and rape culture mindset people)

profic people (people who are interested in harmful things in fictional media isn't lime that in real life. For example someone being a lolicon/someone who in sexual or romantic interested in child-like in looks or child anime characters ≠ liking kids in that way/ways irl. Even though it still makes one a pedophile no matter if the child is fictional or not.), Radqueers (Someone who thinks people with harmful paraphiles like pedophile, Zoophiles, Necrophilies and transids/transracial/transabled/etc linked to transids should be in the queer community.)

(Lolis/Lolibait being one of the harmful things in fictional media.)

(Note: The fetishized/Fetishizes/Fetishers as in fetishisation, Fetishisation and Fetishes are VERY two different things despite sharing a same word. One is straight up bad because its harmful aka Fetishisation because Fetishisation treats groups of people as sex objects not humans)

(Examples of groups of people that Fetishisation has its hands on: sex workers, women, lgbtq people, POC/People of colour, traumatised people etc. Fetishisation even applies to heavy topics like SA, p3d0, ¡nc3$t, etc which harms people who went through those trauma. This type of Fetishisation isn't from traumatised people nor does it come from people with mental issues/disorders, it's comes from non traumatised people/abled body people (people with no disorders/mental issues) because its apart of the Fetishisation of the traumatised people who went through this trauma. For example there is a popular book about heavy topics however re-releases of that book, the cover of these re-releases sexualizes the heavy topics in the book. Because its apart of that heavy topics Fetishisation.)

(Note pt 2: while one is in the grey zone aka Fetishes. Grey zone doesn't mean it is 100% bad thing and you are automatically a evil person! It's a complex thing that depends on the person 👍. How is it complex? Well Some Fetishes can be apart sadly apart of Fetishisation, while other come naturally, while others are from trauma, while others are come from disorders or mental issues, etc. That's why it's complex, this is same said with kinks which is also complex and in the grey area because it's depends on the person for that reason and how they are treating their Fetishes/kinks. Fetishes and kinks aren't all evil but we all have to be aware of horrible people who are misusing their fetishes/kinks to keep people with fetishes and kinks safe from those types of people because those types of people don't see their partners as human with boundaries, safe words and feelings but an object which doesn't create a healthy environment in that nature. The people who misuse kinks/fetishes come from fetishisation to the point they might harm people in real life because of their kinks/fetishes that came from fetishisation. Fetishisation even got its dirty hands of fetishes and kinks too however not everyone has sexual fantasies/kinks/fetishes come from fetishisation/want to harm others! There is a big difference between people with fetishes/sexual fantasies/kinks that don't come from fetishisation and people with fetishes/kinks/sexual fantasies that come from fetishisation!)

people who hate on kins (like fictionkins, dollkins, otherkins, etc) and therians

p3d0s (this includes L0l¡/sh0t@ likers/supporters) (Note: I'm not talking about people with intrusive thoughts nor people who was falsely accused of the horrible crimes like p3d0ph¡l¡a. They don't count in this dni) (Context: Lolicons and Shotacons are grown adults who find fictional characters that look like children/toddlers/babies attractive or sexual attractive. So yeah basically they are pedophiles trying to justify their sick behaviour behind "It's fiction" excuse. Shotacons for attracted to little boys and Lolicon being attracted to little girls)

Z00files/Animal rapists

Crypto bros/sisters (idk the female version of a Crypto bro even though there are women who go into Crypto)

People who think sexual abuse can be "consensual" (yes there are people people who think sexual abuse can be "consensual" when that "consent" wasn't even consensual)

People who uses "don't read/play/watch it" to put people down for criticaling media or calling out media which has harm in it. (Even though they can simply block those people instead of commenting that if they can't handle the truth, don't like their favourite media having criticism or straight up have harmful mindset they want to keep. Yes don't play/read/watch term has been used to put people down for criticism or calling out harmful behaviour instead of actual trying to help people LIKE ITS SUPPOSED TOO! You know people who thought they can handle it then they turn out they can't and thats perfectly fine!)

Anya x Jimmy (From mouthwashing) shippers

transids (transabled, transracial, etc)

intersexist

exorsexist

Urbanspook Fans (I don't want people who are a fan of exploitation horror on my account. It's fine if you have your own au that isn't a work of exploitation horror like the original because the series had potential but it ended up being created by someone who is a piece of shit. It's just people who like the media being exploitation horror as it is)

(If you don't know, exploitation horror is a harmful genre in horror, it uses heavily topics just to get a reaction from the audience or there just for shock value. There is nothing wrong with using heavily topics in fiction ofc! But using heavily topics just for shock value can be harmful)

Fatphobic people

Ai artists/supporters

Ai fanfic/author writers

Art stealers

Fanfic stealers

Anti furries people

Anti therian people

Any people who just hate anything that is harmless and isn't harming people in real life

Radqueers (People who are in support of paraphiles, yes it includes the harmful ones like pedophilia and want them in the queer community. If it was about the harmless ones only like people wanting to date a robot or a device. Then sure, it wouldn't be a bad thing. But they are supporting the harmful ones so I don't want those people on my account)

(Okay I found out that term also got fucking stolen and changed by people who want pedophiles, animal abusers and corspe rapists in the queer community. The original term was pretty harmless with queer communities allowing harmless different gender identities in the community. If you are of the original meaning term you are allowed to be on my account. If you are the one who wants Animal abusers, corspe rapists and pedophiles in the queer community. Please block me.)

People who bully beginner artists/Artists with exaggerated art styles

People who find "jokes" of people bullying beginner artists/Artists with exaggerated art styles "funny"

NFT supporters/likers

People who are into stepcest (Step mother x step daughter/son, step father x step daughter/son, etc)

Donald Trump supporters

Wallyest aka Appleest DNI and selfest shippers in general (It's makes me uncomfortable, i have no problem with these types of shippers since its harmless most of the time. It's just not my cup of tea of ships. :3)

(If you are a mutual of mine you does selfest/mirrorshipping, you can stay I'm not going judge you. 👍 this dni just applies to people that i don't know.)

Transphobic people (This includes terfs/Transgender exclusionary radical feminists)

Homophobic people (This includes Lesphobic, Aphobic, Biphobic etc)

Racist people

people who believe in purity culture

Anti ACAB/All cops are bastards

Swerfs/Sex Worker exclusionary radical feminists)

Anti porn people (This is due that anti porn comes from whorephobia aka the name of the bigot nature against sex workers because pornstars are still sex workers and anti porn also comes from purity culture too. Its also demonises human trafficked victims and drug addicts. Its also supports police brutality)

anti sex work people (same reason as anti porn, it comes from whorephobia and purity culture, the demonstration of Human trafficked victims and drug addicts and supporting police brutality)

(How does anti porn and anti sex work demonise drug addicts and human trafficked victims? Simple it's the police, police arrest drug addicts when its been provided time and time again, addictions don't come out of nowhere it comes from some sort of cause like childhood trauma, peer pressure, trauma in general, mental health issues, etc. Sex workers can be drug addicts due that they are human just like everyone else, they can have the same reasons why they got addicted to drugs. The police will arrested human trafficked victims if porn and sex work is illegal because they are still a "sex worker" and not a victim in the eyes of the police and the victim were only trying to escape their abuse only to be thrown in prison or even get the death penalty. So being anti sex work or anti porn supports police harming drug addicts and human trafficked victims also making porn or sex work illegal harms POC/People colour and POC/People of colour sex workers because police will kill or arrest people of colour who aren't sex workers and cover their hate crime with "they were a sex worker/Pornstar so I can Legally kill them". Yes making porn or sex work illegal gives police to kill more innocent people legally meaning it won't count as "murder" or "hate crime" or "Abuse of power" in the eyes of the court.so yes being anti porn/sex work doesn't make you a "Feminist", an "Ally" to queer, victims of human sex trafficking or people of colour, disabled people, transgender people, its makes you a supporter of police's violence against minorities and victims. I swear many anti porn and anti sex work people have forgotten why the whole ACAB/All cops are bastards movement exists.)

N@z¡ supporters/N@z!s

Israel. supporters

Ablest people

Pro Capitalism

Pro patriarchy

Anti abortion people/Pro lives

People who think fictional can't affect reality (I'm more talking fictional that has harmful elements such as demonising minorities, fetishizing heavily topics aka Fetishisation of heavily topics, etc, false information about animals or groups of people) (For example, in fictional media they demonise sharks which had a strong affect on real life. Fishers won't save a shark that been caught because they think they are going to kill them because that what fictional media told them. How racist people demonise cultures in their fictional media to the point, people start to think that's how the culture is like without looking into it. Another example is how media treat female sex workers to their male sex workers counterparts. Female sex workers are mostly seen as human trafficked victims that have no plot to the story, its just "all female sex workers are human trafficked" point. But when it's male sex worker, there is no mention him being human trafficked. It's seen as his job he signed up for. I have no problem with media calls out with serious topics that happen in jobs. But this is a double standard in fictional media about sex workers) (note: There is also problems with fictional media that can harm real people, for example there is a oversexualisation about women especially black women in fiction media. This came from gross white men and has caused affect of women. I think people think fetishizers fetishize real people of colour sex workers when it's not always true. They go after fictional porn too. This is why it's important for websites that allow fiction porn to block tags that rooted in fetishisation of real people, same with websites that allow real porn to save real sex workers to not feel dehumanised and help the less fetishisation of real people. Heck there are countries that block out inappropriate material that used for harm in fictional because predators use it instead of real child sexual abuse material or any real abuse, child predators do use harmless material of kids too sadly. I think people think child predators only go after real sexual abuse material. When they don't, they look at alternatives and fictional child sexual abuse material is one of the alternatives.)

People who think cyber bullying isn't real

People are anti an religious that isn't Christian (example: Anti Jews, Muslims, Pagans, people who believes in Satanism, etc. These are about people who hate religion because they can not about people who hate religion due to religious trauma!)

misogynists

zionists (not the religion, the people who support Isnotreal since that's what they are called.)

Incest likers/supporters

fetishizers (the ones who fetishize race, Sexuality, Disabled ppl, People's trauma, gender, bodytypes, etc aka seeing groups of people as Objects not humans.)

bimisogyny (another term I wasn't aware of that existed until now so its also on my dni list)

Sexist ppl

Fatshamers

Slutshamers

Victim blamers

People who hate on harmless ships (Such as Oc x canon, canon x canon, rarepairs, Self inserts x canon etc.)

Toxic Helluva boss/Hazbin fans who have to make a big fuss over harmless things (like a vaild criticism of episode feeling rushed as a example or even harmless redesigns. (I seen alot HH/HB fans being just bad people over the redesign one when the redesigns were just there for fun or to help with character designs for future ocs they might have or characters if they go onto bigger things 😥) (Also I'm not talking about people who is critical out of pure hate for the creator or show. Since those type of criticise is out of hate then being helpful. Like I seen toxic helluva boss/hazbin hotel fans getting pretty pissed off at people who are critical of the show who are being very respectful with their criticise of the shows. Since the criticise they have is pretty useful for anyone. :3)

👆 This goes with any fandoms ngl

Any toxic fans really in any fandom

Alex Kister apologists/supporters (The creator of TMC, I'm not talking about people who don't know what he has done nor fans of TMC! Im just people who knew what he has done and still support him 👍)

Bigoted people!

People who make traumatised people's trauma as gender wars (Example: Mostly **from what I seen btw** the male fake allies of male trauma of any type survivors saying 'It's happens to men too' under a female or AFAB person of the same trauma video about their trauma)

Anti-Kink people

Fujios (This is under fetishizers who fetishizes groups of people since they fetishize gay people to my knowledge, correct me if im wrong 😭.)

People who forgave yan dev and people who support him

People who support Dream (The dsmp member)

Fascists

People who romanticizes true crime

People who treat real victims of trauma as circus animals and not humans

MERF (Male exclusionary radfem/Radical "Feminist", I looked this up and many sources say its an alternative term for terfs who are Transphobic to trans women, they see trans women as men.)

People who sexualizes/Fetishizes religion (that does includes nuns because the fetishisation of nuns came from cisgender straight men who has/had a rape culture mindset)

People who think cisgender men or straight people or white people can be opesssed (the only times these people can be opessed is they already apart of a minority but again they aren't being opessed. For example a cisgender man might be a person of colour living in a white dominated country he is opessed because of his skin, a white person might disabled they are opessed because they are disabled and straight person might be transgender they are only opessed because of they are transgender. These are only examples.)

Lovelypeaches fans/stans

People who demonised addictions (yes this includes the demonising porn addiction and Character ai/cai addiction since porn addiction and Character ai/cai is still addictions. Addictions are hard to stop being addictions, shaming someone for their addiction isn't helping or portraying someone for their addiction as a "bad person" or calling out a user for their addiction is also a shit thing to do. I don't use c.ai, I think people attacking people over unhealthy addictions is bad thing to do instead of helping them!)

(Also people who have addiction to cai or character ai are mostly minors and people shouldn't be harassing minors)

Anti recovery people

White supremacy people

Classicism People (I think that's how you spell it, People who judge others based on where they are in the hierarchy)

Wilbur Soot (The YouTuber from Dream (Minecraft YTer's group) Supporters/forgivers

white feminists (White Feminists are basically a "Feminist" version of White supremacy)

People who think "blackwashing" exists (it's a term that was created by a white supremacist)

transmisogyny people (I didn't know this exists until recently)

Georgenotfound supporters/apologist (I'm not talking about people who didn't know, I'm talking about people who do know and still support him)

Those "meme/joke" accounts or people who support those accounts (the ones that joke about heavy topics not for comfort but they don't see those heavy topics as heavy topics, straight up bigoted or hating on people who is having fun and doing something harmless)

People who spread misinformation about important things and heavily topics on purpose

culture appropriation people (under the racist dni)

People who have crushes on REAL LIFE abusers/rapists/serial killers/etc

People who use character ai/cai to talk to AI bots of real people (I'm not talking about live action characters more so on real life abusers/actors/singers/rapists/serial killers/etc. I don't use c.ai but i still find it weird)

People who write/read fanfics of real people (Again not talking about live action characters since it doesn't count due it is a character. This is more about celebrities, actors, etc since it's done without their consent most of the timr. Even people do this with real life serial killers/abusers/rapists/etc)

People who "joke" about fucking animals/fishes (it's fucking weird, I don't know what's so funny about sexual animal abuse)

I should really explain some things of my DNI list.

What's Terf?

A terf is short for Trans-exclusionary radical "feminism"/Trans gender exclusionary "Radfems"It's pretty self explanatory, they are "Feminists" who are Transphobic.

What's a Swerf?

A swerf is short for sex workers exclusionary radical "Feminism"/Sex Worker exclusionary "Radfems".

Swerfs are the sister of terfs in a way.

Yes the sex work industry and its sub industries have serious problems and exploitive however the sex work industry and its sub industries aren't the only industries with serious problems and exploitative, all industries in this world have serious problems and exploitative due to all industries are under Capitalism and Patriarchy's control.

Swerfs also have this black and white view of sex workers and clients, Swerfs think all sex workers are straight cisgender women and all clients are straight cisgender men when in reality sex workers can be any gender and Sexuality same with the clients.

Swerfs also think sex work is the reason for women objection (when it's Patriarchy's fault) and sex work is only for "Male gaze" (Which doesn't make sense as male clients aren't the only clients due there are clients that are all genders)

The time i know about the male gaze fits into sex work more on the heterosexual men side since well that's literally what male gaze applies too, gross Heterosexual men (I'm talking about misogynistic straight cisgender men who objectify women btw)

However Swerfs only use it to fit in "Every sex worker is a woman and every client is a man." View they have while completely forgetting about lesbian SWers, gay SWers, Bi Swers and other Sexuality outside of straight SWers and clients. Queer clients and Swers exist.

Swerfs also blame sex workers for the gross crimes of men and inappropriate behaviour against women (Again Patriarchy's fault) **FROM WHAT I SEEN**

They also blame sex workers for holding up the patriarchy and blame them for fetishisation of groups of people who get fetishized instead of the fetishizers and Patriarchy.

They also paint SW as all types of literal sexual crimes. When SW and those sexual crime CRIMES ARE VERY DIFFERENT.

(SW is legal and the crime they normally paint Sex work as takes place in countries where SW is illegal.)

Swerfs treat sex workers as not human as all, which is really dehumanising. For example when a gross man is being weird over a woman's body and people call it out they go "wow you met a real woman" since they associated this kind of behaviour with porn or they go "Wow, you met a woman outside of porn" which gives the vibe if a woman becomes a pornstar (a type of sex worker) she isn't a human anymore which is really dehumanising. It's like how terfs and transphobes hate trans women because they aren't "real women".

also Sex w

Also they are very hypocritical, For example many swerfs see SW as danger to women and queer/genderqueer/trans/intersex/non binary people that aren't SWers (because they think Queer SWers, Female swers, intersex swers, trans swers and genderqueer swers are responsible for the quee/trans/intersex/Non binary fetishisation and gross men seeing women as objects. They only care about non female, genderqueer, trans, intersex, non binary SWers and non queer SWers not the Swers themselves even though that's what they are claim to be "saving") and fictional adult content is fine, only for them to a 180° and start attack fictional adult content and also calling it harmful to women and queer people (Also doing the same thing they do to SWers. They blame all SWers for the actions of gross men and not the gross men for their own actions or in some cases blame all SWers for a one bad SWer actions. For example if a SWer is doing kinks that are for traumatised people for the male gaze and people found out about this, swerfs blame all SWers for that SWer action.) But in this case, blame every person who does adult content instead of the gross people (aka the queer fetishers and gross men who see women as objects or the people who made that content for the male gaze/they are queer fetisher themselves). (Don't get me wrong there is problems with fictional adult content of all kinds, it's good and important to call it out. However what I explained with the swerfs, there aren't doing that. It's about villainizing and controlling thanks to purity culture.)

Also swerfs with anti fictional adult content movement they now hooked on, they also have the same black and white mindset like they do with SW but In this case be the only people who draw/write adult content are men. (I guess queergender/intersex/trans/no binary people, women and queer people who draw/write adult content is non existence recording to swerfs)

I do understand the worry about minors getting into sex work while underage however it isn't sex work's fault for this, it's the lack of education because there are some important things that is missing like if they went homeless while underage its literally child endangerment but schools wont talk about it. but many schools don't teach that. Heck even in sex education, some schools don't teach kids consent or signs of sexual assault/sexual abuse or safe sex, some schools just stick to sex = babies and pregnancy over and over again. (From my experience at least in school at least). How to fix this? Tell people how important education is! Instead of blaming sex work.

Of course, the sex work and porn industry deserves to get its serious problems spread awareness. People forget that these industries are complex due to how easy it gotten to do porn or sex work same with other industries like Video games, Animation, Music industries (industries with same problems due to corruption of jobs as a whole). Like Porn and sex work don't need a boss to get the job unlike before pornstars can pick up a camera to do porn with other sex workers who is the same as them (aka they are being self employed or having friends who are sex workers or a partner who is okay with this type of sex work). Making Sex work or porn illegal doesn't help these problems. It causes more problems. Heck, Police doesn't give a shit about human trafficked victims in all types of jobs industries. They still think they are breaking the law and call them "illegal workers" then arrest them or sue them and letting their abusers off the hook to continue their harm. Swerfs only bring these problems just to make those jobs illegal which again doesn't help.

Making sex work or porn illegal gives police the right to LEGALLY kill sex workers (that includes sex human traffic victims, Poc/disabled/queer/Intersex/queergender/transgender/Non binary people, people in other minorities and women who aren't sex workers), that's right the law can give police to kill sex workers legally. It won't be seen as an abuse of power or murder or police violence againist the innocent in the eyes of the law. These people have families and friends since they are still human, if a police officer kills them then their families and friends cannot do anything about it. Because the police officer will tell the court "They were a sex worker, by rights of the law. I was allowed to kill them." No matter what if they killed a sex worker or not. They will use it as an excuse. Why on earth are they giving more power to the corruption of police force?

What are anti-kink people?

Anti kink people are people who don't understand kinks at all but only know the serious harmful stereotypes of kinks. They don't want to learn about kinks, they want kinks to be illegal due to the harmful stereotypes against kinks they know of since these harmful stereotypes have filled up their brain so they assumed all kinks are like their harmful stereotypes counterparts

Also they confused kinks with Fetishisation.

(Note: Fetishisation isn't about fetishes, Fetishisation is about people seeing groups of people such as survivors of literally crimes, POC, disabled people, women etc as objects not as humans.)

When both aren't the same thing. Don't get me wrong there are people who misuse kinks for their own pleasure or for the "male gaze" or fetishisation of real types of people (especially kinks that are mostly used by traumatised people as a coping mechanism, that kink was formed from their trauma or take back control they lost in their trauma because people who aren't traumatised by the topics that the kinks are based on because they find those topics "hot" and it's closer thing they are going to get to their gross fantasies) also there is kinks that arent here to help traumatised people but to fetishisation people/fantasies about harmful stuff/justify gross mindsets (by non traumatised people/gross people btw) and we should call out these gross people but anti kink people can't tell the difference between kinks being used right, kinks being used bad or the "kinks" that are rooted in harmful nature

They think all kinks = bad/harmful without talking with traumatised people who have kinks, people with kinks or doing any research on the kinks themselves.

The same way Swerfs want SW to be illegal and Terfs want transgender to be illegal too.

Due to

Swerfs treat sex workers as subhumans and the cause of everything bad

Terfs treat Trans people (Mostly trans women) as sub humans

Anti kink people treat kinks as an abomination sub group to sex and the cause of every thing bad.

Because of the Transphobic ideas, SWphobic (idk if I can say the actual word on here) ideas and anti kinks ideas against those people (Sex workers and Transgender people) and that group (kinks)

Also making kinks, sex work, porn illegal is apart of Prison–industrial complex, if you don't know, to be it short it's a racist system in prison system aka putting POC sex workers and queer POC in danger (Since kinks are a big part in Lgbtq community). This system is already in prison system and is actively causing harm to POC (People of colour)

[wildesttherianfr34kz0n3]

Ok, what do you mean when you say you're radqueer? Do you mean TERF?

Otherwise, you don't seem like that type of person so I wanna know what you think it means.

This is all /gen and /nm btw

For me, being a radqueer means accepting all good faith identities. That means that unless you mean to do harm in some way and you know it, I think that you're valid. If it is harming someone and you aren't aware, then I will have open arms, because online harassment isn't fun and for some reason telling people to kys is a thing now. If you know it is harmful, I won't hate you- but I would try to help things be less hurtful. When I say harmful to others, i mean actively- not just 'a bit offensive, but doing damage in a mental or physical way. This can include things like stereotyping- or for example using a medical term in an everyday way that actually affects others. (That may sound confusing, an example would be that by saying someone is delusional over something that is unrelated to medical delusions, the definition is therefore being changed, and leads to the understanding of- and how seriously it is taken- being diminished. This has happened to me irl before)

Another aspect is that if someone personally harms you, then I don't mind if you are rude to them, but if you don't know them and are being rude for something even though you haven't seen them be rude dat all, that's wrong. Just be nice, basically.

Terfs basically say that being transgender isn't real. They usually are quite rude to trans people and misgender on purpose, and disguise it as feminism. They also call trans people the 'trans cult', while telling everyone who is transmasc to be a woman because it's better than being a man and that they will love and appreciate you. It is a little bit creepy and as a transmascc person I find it pretty darn offensive.

Think that's everything I wanted to cover lol

[ecos-syscourse]

Crazy how watching your interactions with that anon it becomes increasingly obvious that people continue to mix up radical inclusion and radical queer and refuse to admit they're wrong about it. (/nay)

Radical inclusion is about specific inclusion of marginalized people, people who are different than you, and the otherwise shunned. It's not blind acceptance of everything but an acknowledgment of people and their real, diverse experiences. It's good faith acceptance of those who do not harm another but doesn't other those who are recovering or have in the past hurt someone. (Cool idea that people can change for the better!)

Radqueer took what Radinclus is and added paraphilia, non-gender transids, proship, etc, into their idea of radical acceptance. Which frankly at its core isn't that bad either and I don't think a lot of people are ready for that conversation, more of the issues lay in the community than what the term was meant for itself. Nuance something or other since so many of its included facets are seen as big bads when they are very large topics with a lot involved in them alone too. (For example, a paraphilia can be as simple as liking feet, and some things like monsterXhuman are sometimes put under the proship umbrella. And a whole conversation to be had about atypical dysphoria! But I'm getting away from myself here.)

Any who, sorry for the brief ramble in your inbox, and I hope you have a good day or night!

THIS THIS THIS THIS THIS!!!!!!!!!