#Anti radqueer

[hauntedghostpuppy]

at least one rq will probably see this reblog so just a heads up

i am autistic.

i am diagnosed autistic.

i was diagnosed at a very early age.

you were not.

you did not get early intervention and i don't care if you're a "transage minor" you will not get early intervention and you will not get your diagnosis

because if you are transautistic, you are not autistic. and you will not be autistic.

you actively harm me and all the people i care about by saying you want to have our disability.

you are not disabled. you are ableist. you are actively preaching everything you claim to preach against.

autism is not fun, it is not "silly quirky baby uwu googoogaga" syndrome or "heheheha evil autism gremlin" disorder. it is a real, sometimes debilitating disability, that affects grown ass adults and kids alike.

own up to your shit, accept that you are not autistic, and you never will be, and shut up. stop speaking over us claiming to be one of us.

reminder to transautistics!

you are not autistic.

you will never be autistic.

your identity is invalid.

you are harming real autistic people.

fuck you.

[wanderingcritter]

god gives his most niche fandoms to his most autistic warriors

[softiestuffie]

Adoptive siblings in fiction fucking is a special kind of nice to me because you have half the fans arguing that "adoptive siblings are siblings! you shouldn't ship them!" and the other half saying "technically they aren't blood related so it's okay for them to do it" and im over here like "they want to fuck nasty BECAUSE they're siblings <3"

[marquessofendos]

depends entirely on whats going on there. transrace is a term that wasnt originally radqueer and thats where a big portion of issues lie; it was originally meant to refer to children being adopted by a family of a different race (i.e. a black couple adopting a white child would make the child transracial or transrace)

if the transrace individual in question is a transracial adoptee, thats whatever. do what you want you were raised in that culture you can own it if you want

now onto radqueer usage. radqueers appropriated and co-opted the term, which highkey fucking sucks to begin with, especially for the original users of the term. theyre now being conflated with racist culture appropriation and worse.

depending on the race and the choice of transition method, though, its not. ALWAYS harmful transitioning, but. im gonna be deadass with you 80% of the radqueer usage of transrace we've seen has been white kids being insanely racist/appropriative (and in some cases, full on slur usage). so. do with that what you will

if the radqueers idea of transitioning is "learning a language and engaging with the culture in a nonappropriative way and potentially even moving to a new country" we would genuinely not gaf. that would not be harmful transitioning thats kinda just a thing all kinds of people do

but if theyre pulling ariana griande levels of skin darkening and trying to pass as black, then weeeee have a whole new problem dont we?

atypical dysphoria is a very real issue, radqueer bs aside. if your atypical dysphoria is around your race, you should take some serious considerations as to what would and wouldnt be a harmful method to transition. if you feel like you should have been born black, there is nothing wrong with consuming black media, cooking typical black meals for yourself, engaging with the culture in a way that does not appropriate or harm anyone. calling yourself transrace or any variant thereof is inherently harmful, however, because of the fact that the term itself was appropriated and is associated with racism and appropriation to begin with

Hey sorry for asking this but you don't have to answer

What's radqueer supposed to mean?

Google wasn't particularly helpful

-syder

radqueers are hard to describe, so lets start with "a subsect of the MOGAI community". "radical queers" on paper does seem like a good idea. theyre pro-queer, pro-para, pro-endo, pro-good faith identities, and so far, all that sounds great, and you and i probably are also both pro these things.

until you get to the part where many radqueers fully believe children and animals can consent ("pro-contact radqueers"), as well as support harmful transitioning (i.e. RCTA/transrace/trace where people want to transition to a different race from their bodies) and just awful transid stuff in general (stuff like transautism where someone allistic wants to transition to having autism)

they also have a HUGE problem with ignoring dnis. radqueers WILL interact with anti radqueers as if its their god given fucking duty. so as a reminder to any radqueers who read this and think its a bright idea to send me an ask

anyways cheers i love answering asks idm at all

[attack1ngvertic4l]

hi! i am a paraphile. we need to talk about paraphilias.

the big three are the ones most people know. aka, pedophilia, zoophilia, and necrophilia.

some people (if not most) do not want to be attracted to this. it is a result of trauma and a survival mechanism made up by the human mind.

not every paraphile wants to act on their impulses. most dont. but because these disorders are so stigmatized, they often cannot get the help they need or want to get better at managing it.

i do not believe animals, children, or anything dead can consent. this is upheld by the law and the moral code of human nature-- protect kids and animals, respect the dead, dont harm them.

some people act these out via kink. which is okay as long as it is done safely and consentually.

there are certain paraphilias that are completely harmless. some people are attracted to rain, some are attracted to plushies.

i myself am an autoassasinophile. i find being close to death or injured very very attractive. i deal with this via my partners. they both help me out, with consent and safety measures in place. i am allowed to stop anytime i want, and so are they.

paraphiles arent evil. they are people too, and deserve to be treated as such. the more we encourage the destigmatization, the more people can get help and manage these impulses better. its not normal for these thoughts to be ocurring, but they can be managed.

be nice. you dont know what happened or what is happening to someone.

[this post is okay to reblog. thank you ^^]

[antiradqueef]

[1nky-quill]

I love the diversity of trans people

I love how each and every one of us has our own unique experience with our queerness

It truly inspires me every time to think about it, because even if all of us are different in one way or another we’re still part of the same community, we’re still a family in a sense.

That’s why is saddens me when I see so many other queer people cast people from the community because their experience with their gender and sexuality doesn’t align with their own experiences/what they expect that person’s experience to be.

Please love other trans people, all other trans people, because we only have each other, and I think it’s very special that we all have a different experiences with expression and sexuality.

[anti-rq-gumi]

You responded again without following the reblog chain, so I'll follow up here. @buggingme

Your fucking anti-endo

No I'm not lmao?

If you take a look at my discourse boundaries, linked in my pinned, this is what you'll find:

that is not taking accountability either,

I can't take accountability for something untrue you assumed about me. You're probably conflating my attitude toward autism with anti endos' attitudes toward CDDs. Regardless of either of our syscourse stances, CDDs are generally believed to be acquired through complex trauma. Autism is always from birth. It is not acquired at all. There is a very clear difference.

even if I have my own struggles to communicate or interact with others that doesn't mean you didn't take what I meant out of context or maybe did not fully understand it.

No I understood everything you said. You made an ableist post and elaborated on it twice. It didn't have any additional context to it.

If you disagreed like a normal person we would not be here. You don't have to be rude about it.

It's true I'm usually nicer than this. If you cared to self reflect at all I would be. Plenty of people have internalized ableism they need to work on, you're just simply not putting in the effort to the detriment of all autistics.

Also I'm not "disagreeing" with you. Acknowledge you're being ableist and I'm calling you out challenge.

I was giving the neurolink as an example of future technology.

Yeah, a bad one that has nothing to do with medical research.

Autism still has a genetic side to it and that is what I was talking about by a "cure." as in genetic ways.

This is eugenics against autistic people.

Your hypothetical ideal future where autism is "cured" is one where all autistic people have been the victim of eugenics and weeded out of the population. There's nothing I can say to cushion that.

I don't have a DNI because terms don't need a DNI - but if your going to immediately repost something that has radqueer in the title to an anti-rq blog you know what your doing.

Honestly I don't know whatever I'm supposedly doing here. I'm fine with us interacting. The original post wasn't a term either.

This was no better a response than the first one? Fix your ableism, please.

More reason to choose TransIDs

If we find in the future as a species cures for autism, I'd be aboard to welcome more Trans-Autistics, and explain the concept to people who would've been Cis-Autistic if they hadn't been "cured" or got any sort of treatment to remove their autism - then I would place a bet more people would be open to the label.

[no-more-rqs]

this is absolutely going to cause me to lose every single follower i have but i Do Not Care so anyways, i have something id like to say.

incest is not inherently damaging whatsoever as long as its consensual. there is zero scientific evidence that consensual incest is damaging. NONE. of course, incestuous abuse absolutely exists and is extremely damaging to the victims of it, but what i am talking about is consensual relationships between adults.

before you call me insane, here:

in an article by clare kasemset from stanford university, she states that one of the main (and only) scientific reasons that incest is illegal is that "the offspring of partners with a high level of consanguinity are more likely to have birth defects". however, this is eugenics: disabled people's children are also very likely to have children with birth defects, and anyone really could potentially have children with birth defects. this argument is simply that incestuous relationships should be illegal so that birth defects cease to exist. keep in mind, the definition of eugenics is "to arrange reproduction within a human population to increase the occurrence of heritable characteristics regarded as desirable"; in essence, make sure that the only people born are "desirable", which would include being able-bodied. kasemset goes on to explain that "the act of incestuous sexual intercourse does not cause harm". incest does not inherently cause harm. the only reasons people give for the illegalization of incestuous relationships are eugenics and the potentially offensiveness of it due to the fact that "the vast majority of people in this country have deep-seated beliefs that incest is immoral".

article source: https://ojs.stanford.edu/ojs/index.php/intersect/article/download/137/35/615

in an article by maria campo redondo and gabriel andrade, they state that "incest represents a risk, but this is not reason enough to illegalize incest". this is because "other circumstances of sexual intercourse may lead to similar risks, and yet, such practices are not illegal". think of how AIDs is used to say that homosexuality should be illegal, how the possibility of miscarriage is used to say that people should only be getting pregnant at young ages, how the possibility of disabled children is used to say that disabled people shouldnt be having children: all of these are arguments that rely on nothing but "disability should be eradicated". ableism is so extremely ingrained in our society that people constantly search for the cure to every disability so that they wont have to deal with disabled people existing. i have had friends who have been told "your children will be disabled though!!!!! 😥" for being disabled just like those who are in incestuous relationships have. you should be allowed to have a child as long as you or someone else is capable of taking care of them, no matter if that child is disabled or not - a child potentially being disabled is not a morally wrong thing. as the authors of this article say, the reasons why incest is illegal "do not relate to public health and genetic risks".

article source: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/phil.12332

in a paper by jeff sebo, he states that "incest increases the incidence of inherited genetic diseases by about three percent". three percent. that is only three out of every hundred children born out of incestuous relationships. the argument of incest increasing disabilities is not only founded on eugenics, but founded on a very small statistic - especially compared to the fact that the probability of an autistic person have an autistic child is, on average, 3.45%. it is no different from any genetically disabled person having a child. advocating for incest to be illegal based on the possibility of disabled children is no different from advocating for disabled people to be sterilized.

he also explains that family is not dramatically different from any other relationship, and that there "are numerous important relationships in our lives—some of which are based on blood, others of which are not—and it is ridiculous to assume that our family members, whoever they may be, are necessarily our emotional centers". for many, many people, friends can even more important than family, or family can seem much more similar to friendly dynamics than typical family dynamics. the argument of families is also very often used against queer people by saying that it ruins the inherent family dynamics that are supposedly present, when in reality, families all function very differently and many people see their siblings or cousins as more like friends than how families are typically portrayed. as the author says: "no relevant moral distinction neatly separates our family relations from the other relationships in our lives".

he also explains that many people claim that incest "turn[s] out badly frequently enough to warrant a categorical ban". incestuous relationships are often abusive ones, this is very evident. however, "the outcome of our test will depend largely on how we run it". if we only ask abuse victims what their experience was (as many, many articles do), we will come to the conclusion that it is all abusive. only looking at people who were children abused by adult family members is not looking at the effects of incest, but looking at the effects of child abuse. yes, there may be a lack of scientific evidence for incest being good - but absence of evidence is not evidence of absence, and there are many, many person experiences from people. on top of that, "those who breach the taboo are branded as outsiders, they suffer the effects of social ostracism, and since others misinterpret this suffering as caused by the act and not the label, they are used as evidence in support of the taboo". if someone is in an incestuous relationship, they will be hated by everyone, which will lead to them being depressed and possibly suicidal - not because of the incest itself, but because of how its treated.

source (PLEASE go read this its very well-done): https://jeffsebo.net/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/the-ethics-of-incest1.pdf

[critterkiddo]

Its very interesting to see a new wave of tumblr users go out of their way to defend Ezra, claiming he was a victim of callout culture against trans women.

(Ezra is not in fact a trans woman.)

"he didn't do shit that deserved that." Hm. Let's see.

Here is Ezra celebrating a pedophile exposing genitals to children.

Here is Ezra gaslighting a victim of CSAM, saying it was their fault.

Here is a moderator of Oddballs, appointed by Ezra himself and even a friend, getting caught grooming 3 children for CSAM.

These are just to name a few things that Ezra has done, along with y'know.

Creating a site that gives (pro contact) pedophiles direct access to children.

But sure. He "didn't do shit".

[marquessofendos]

Trauma is not always gigahyperultra bad things that happen to people. What's traumatic to one person might not affect another person in the slightest. Trauma is individual to the person experiencing it. If you have memories of something traumatic that you have been told repeatedly can't be traumatic because its "too tame", this is your sign to start accepting that trauma

update 1/7/25 since my tags are being ignored

[jakes-personal-blog]

Wow! It is almost like if TRANSGENDER systems compared their experiences with sysmeds to transmeds because it is practically the same! Yeah, you, sysmeds, are like transmeds. (The body is trans, by the way.).

[razor-rabbit]

Just wanted to specify something because apparently we can't have a single safe space!

Pride month is not for radqueers or xenosatanists

it never has been and it never will be. Go ahead and continue crying saying you're being "attacked" for people telling you that minors and animals can't consent and you will never have the illness you weren't born with. You all disgust me on multiple levels as an ill queer minor. In fact, it's disappointing that a minor has more common sense than multiple of you adults have.

[dooblebugreblogs]

anti radqueer build a headmate blogs!

(if anyone wants to be added just lmk!)

@tba-bah

@pumpkinpacks

@eclipian

@alter-soup (not specifically states as anti rq but doesn’t do trans ids or paras

@headmate-cafe

@bluestar-bah

@headmates-from-outer-space

@audiocassette-bah

@silken-threads-bah

@web-created-packs

@faraway-cafe

@headmate-ideas

@tsel-bas

@greys-headm8-summoner

@dreamscape-glow

@the-covens-headmate-inspo

@roroleine

@bah-convenience-store

@headmatesrus

@free-willowmates

@badger-bah

@sapphires-snowfall

@headmate-packages

@infwctednyacifier

@solarz-headmates

@woolys-bah

@rotary-bah

@the-treehouse-creates

@the-sickness-system

@bichitomuerto

@lurksintheballpit

@cloudmail-bah

@alter-bartender

@deityofproendos

@headmate-pack-hotel

@glacialbah

@dooblebuggy (my account :3)

[forget-meabh-not]

Desirdae coining post

Desirdae "A term simular in meaning to dissomei. It supports non-harmful transitioning and is inclusive to everyone with atypical dysphoria , trauma , self doubt , etc-"

an example of a desirdae term would be...

"Desirautism" which is a term for those that desire/yearn/want autism in some way. some examples of why would be: an autistic being feeling as if they are not "autistic enough" , Those who are trying to "reconnect" to their autism due to being forced to mask , Those with atypical dysphoria etc.

note: to clear this term up it does not support harmful transitioning. It does support nonharmful transitioning such as someone with short hair trying to “transition” to long hair, or somone with autism trying to “transition” to autism due to them trying to start unmasking and showing their autistic traits more.

THIS TERM IS STRICTLY ANTI RADQUEER

-Momoko

tags: @radiomogai

symbol found here(link)