#pro consang

[nipplnibblr]

two sisters who perv on each other every night and day and don't have any slip-ups because they know each other too well, only admitting to it way later and instantly fucking sloppy afterwards :3

[withinthecoffin]

“Aren’t they siblings?!?” Sibling who should be aggressively making out.

[dumb-dog-dyke]

big sis coming into my room while i’m lying on my tummy in bed watching a show. not being able to resist turning the volume way up and pinning me down with a hand over my mouth, yanking my boxers down and sliding her cock into my cunt with ease - i’m just too desperate for her and her little sibling’s pussy feels so good

[fruitygaygirl]

Twin big sisters that take turns kissing you, barely leaving you any time to breathe until you're just gasping for breath and completely flustered

Twin big sisters who take turns with you in other ways too ❤️

[no-more-rqs]

this is absolutely going to cause me to lose every single follower i have but i Do Not Care so anyways, i have something id like to say.

incest is not inherently damaging whatsoever as long as its consensual. there is zero scientific evidence that consensual incest is damaging. NONE. of course, incestuous abuse absolutely exists and is extremely damaging to the victims of it, but what i am talking about is consensual relationships between adults.

before you call me insane, here:

in an article by clare kasemset from stanford university, she states that one of the main (and only) scientific reasons that incest is illegal is that "the offspring of partners with a high level of consanguinity are more likely to have birth defects". however, this is eugenics: disabled people's children are also very likely to have children with birth defects, and anyone really could potentially have children with birth defects. this argument is simply that incestuous relationships should be illegal so that birth defects cease to exist. keep in mind, the definition of eugenics is "to arrange reproduction within a human population to increase the occurrence of heritable characteristics regarded as desirable"; in essence, make sure that the only people born are "desirable", which would include being able-bodied. kasemset goes on to explain that "the act of incestuous sexual intercourse does not cause harm". incest does not inherently cause harm. the only reasons people give for the illegalization of incestuous relationships are eugenics and the potentially offensiveness of it due to the fact that "the vast majority of people in this country have deep-seated beliefs that incest is immoral".

article source: https://ojs.stanford.edu/ojs/index.php/intersect/article/download/137/35/615

in an article by maria campo redondo and gabriel andrade, they state that "incest represents a risk, but this is not reason enough to illegalize incest". this is because "other circumstances of sexual intercourse may lead to similar risks, and yet, such practices are not illegal". think of how AIDs is used to say that homosexuality should be illegal, how the possibility of miscarriage is used to say that people should only be getting pregnant at young ages, how the possibility of disabled children is used to say that disabled people shouldnt be having children: all of these are arguments that rely on nothing but "disability should be eradicated". ableism is so extremely ingrained in our society that people constantly search for the cure to every disability so that they wont have to deal with disabled people existing. i have had friends who have been told "your children will be disabled though!!!!! 😥" for being disabled just like those who are in incestuous relationships have. you should be allowed to have a child as long as you or someone else is capable of taking care of them, no matter if that child is disabled or not - a child potentially being disabled is not a morally wrong thing. as the authors of this article say, the reasons why incest is illegal "do not relate to public health and genetic risks".

article source: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/phil.12332

in a paper by jeff sebo, he states that "incest increases the incidence of inherited genetic diseases by about three percent". three percent. that is only three out of every hundred children born out of incestuous relationships. the argument of incest increasing disabilities is not only founded on eugenics, but founded on a very small statistic - especially compared to the fact that the probability of an autistic person have an autistic child is, on average, 3.45%. it is no different from any genetically disabled person having a child. advocating for incest to be illegal based on the possibility of disabled children is no different from advocating for disabled people to be sterilized.

he also explains that family is not dramatically different from any other relationship, and that there "are numerous important relationships in our lives—some of which are based on blood, others of which are not—and it is ridiculous to assume that our family members, whoever they may be, are necessarily our emotional centers". for many, many people, friends can even more important than family, or family can seem much more similar to friendly dynamics than typical family dynamics. the argument of families is also very often used against queer people by saying that it ruins the inherent family dynamics that are supposedly present, when in reality, families all function very differently and many people see their siblings or cousins as more like friends than how families are typically portrayed. as the author says: "no relevant moral distinction neatly separates our family relations from the other relationships in our lives".

he also explains that many people claim that incest "turn[s] out badly frequently enough to warrant a categorical ban". incestuous relationships are often abusive ones, this is very evident. however, "the outcome of our test will depend largely on how we run it". if we only ask abuse victims what their experience was (as many, many articles do), we will come to the conclusion that it is all abusive. only looking at people who were children abused by adult family members is not looking at the effects of incest, but looking at the effects of child abuse. yes, there may be a lack of scientific evidence for incest being good - but absence of evidence is not evidence of absence, and there are many, many person experiences from people. on top of that, "those who breach the taboo are branded as outsiders, they suffer the effects of social ostracism, and since others misinterpret this suffering as caused by the act and not the label, they are used as evidence in support of the taboo". if someone is in an incestuous relationship, they will be hated by everyone, which will lead to them being depressed and possibly suicidal - not because of the incest itself, but because of how its treated.

source (PLEASE go read this its very well-done): https://jeffsebo.net/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/the-ethics-of-incest1.pdf

[sistrkissr]

normalize humping your mom/sister's thigh and drooling in her mouth

[puddlesofsnakes]

I find it funny how the only argument that those who are anti-consang have is just “I SUPPORT EUGENICS,” which also immediately goes down the drain when it’s a same-sex relationship or a relationship between two people who don’t want children.

[monster-lover-pride]

"Southpark fan!"

"proshitters dni"

[the-foxhounds]

Hey para community/cosang/radqueer The Internet Investigator made a video on the community so more antis might come. prepare for hate

[meimei-syndr0me]

little sister who unrepentantly ruins any and all chances of big brother getting a girlfriend (it's okay, right? cuz he has her, right? little sister is all he needs, right?)

(he wouldn't abandon her just for some girl, right? after all, he said she's the one he loves most in the world!)

[consanguinamorose]

May I ask how your relationship with your dad started?

Basically after kinda testing the waters a little bit and seeing that my dad didn’t have any aversion towards what i did, I randomly just shoot my shot when we were lounging around on the couch in the living room.

I didn’t go for the straight-shooter statement (like “I’m in love with you” and whatnot), since I’ve always been a shy one when it comes to feelings in a romantic relationship.

What I did was brought up about how I’ve been saving myself for ‘the one’ (which is VERY unusual for someone my age in the first place already — but it’s true, I think dating just for the sake of dating and not dating seriously with the intention of getting married would just be a pain in the ass, from the stories of my friends, since I was in high school up until adulthood).

When he asked about who that might be (referring to ‘the one’) I just answered, “what if it’s you?”

And well, the rest is history.

[fruitygaygirl]

Sister kissing is perfectly ethical. You should kiss your sister and be happy with her. Date her, love her, make her happy

[sistrkissr]

two sisters going out shopping after the younger gets a good grade in school, and big sis picks her out a nice pair of (tighter than normal) tights. little sister is reluctant to try them because they seemed far too small, but they're cute so it couldn't be that big of a deal? right?

and of course big sis has to be in the changing stalls with her! creeps might walk in and watch her lil sis change, who's gonna be there to protect her if not big sis?

"u-uh, sis, these are too small... ugh—" she groans, unaware how bad her big sis is trying not to fuck her right then and there, watching her bend over and try to fit her leg in the tights.

one leg goes in, hardly the other, and now she pushed those tights up trying to get her cute little butt to fit in them. she turns around to face her sis who is lost in thought (of rubbing her puffy clit through her tiny white underwear with lace and bow).

the moans she makes are getting to big sis, too, the sight of her trying hard to fit in and the faces she makes, she can't help herself and offers "can i help you put them on? c-c'mere."

she bends down to reach her levels and grabs the top of the tights, barely above her knees as her hands wander to her butt, groping it and lightly smacking. lil sis moans in her ear "m-mmfh... what are you—"

"cmon, i do this all the time! it's okay, i'm your big sis." a faux-sweet smile on her face, an innocent tone as she gropes harder, and lil sis is forcing herself to not enjoy it. it feels weird and her panties are getting a bit wet. good thing big sis is here to inspect it!

finally her fingers gently run along her underwear, making lil sis moan once more and big sis is honoured to be the reason the panties are so damp. "b-big sis, why is my underwear wet..."

"shhh, it's normal, trust me. happens to the best of us, even me!" she starts to rub her cunny through her damp panties gently, and lil sis continues with the moans. they get louder and louder as her legs begin to wobble.

eventually lil sis gets out of those tights, bending over the little stool with her palms against the wall as big sis grinds herself on her ass, and no one has idea ♡

[trulyradicalactivist]

Love Is Never Wrong.

Imagine being told that something as natural as your own heartbeat is wrong. Imagine waking up every morning, knowing that simply feeling love could make you a target for violence and hatred. That it could put your life, your job, your relationships, and your health at risk. For millions of people around the world, maybe even more than that, this is not just a nightmare, it is their reality. It is what they deal with daily. They are hated and punished simply because of who they're attracted to. They are treated as if love were a crime instead of a fundamental part of human existence. But love is not a crime. And no one, absolutely no one, deserves to be hated or persecuted for something as natural as their attraction. This applies not only to those who are gay, bisexual, pansexual, asexual, or so forth. It also applies to paraphiles. It applies to anyone and everyone with an attraction seen as abnormal by the society we live in. A society that forces normality down our throats and insists that we cannot and will not love who we love.

Love is one of the most powerful and universal human experiences. Not just romantic love or sexual love either. Platonic love, familial love, love between partners, unlabeled love of all kinds. It brings people together, it gives many people a purpose or a reason to continue when that big fight they fight begins to wear down, and fills our hearts with joy and warmth. Love, in all its forms, has been celebrated in poetry, music, and art for centuries because it is one of the most beautiful things about being alive. So why is it that some people are told their love is wrong? Why are some forced to hide, to fear, to suffer simply because their heart leads them in a direction others don’t understand?

Love, whether a choice or something given the day you were born, whether you have very little or so much it spills from your soul, whether it is romantic or it is platonic or anything between, is as natural as the color of your eyes or the sound of your laughter. To hate someone for their attraction is to hate them for something that is simply a part of who they are. How can that ever be justified? How can you justify hatred of that extreme?

The reality of this form of persecution is heartbreaking. Families turn their backs on their own children. Friends become strangers. People are denied opportunities, stripped of their rights, and, in the worst cases, harmed or even killed, just because of who they love.

The emotional toll of this hatred is devastating. Imagine a child growing up with the weight of secrecy crushing them, terrified of being honest about who they are because they fear rejection or violence. Thinking that what they are growing into, queer or para, will make them a monster. Imagine someone longing to hold the hand of the person they love in public, but instead, they lower their eyes and keep their distance, afraid of the stares, the whispers, or worse. Maybe that person is of the same gender or sex as them, maybe that person is of their same blood.

This is not just unfair. It is cruel. It is unjustifiable. It is bigoted.

Hatred, discrimination, and violence leave scars, both visible and invisible. They push people into loneliness, depression, and despair. They rob people of the right to love freely, to be themselves without fear, to speak their truth in a way they feel comfortable and safe doing so. No one deserves to carry that pain simply because of who they are attracted to. The world does not need more hate. It does not need more judgment, more rejection, or more suffering. What the world needs is more love. More compassion. More understanding.

If we want to live in a kinder, more just world, we must reject the idea that anyone’s love is worth less than another’s. We must reject the thought that a love could be taboo or unnatural. We must open our hearts and stand against hatred in all its forms. Because in the end, the only thing that should matter about love is that it is real. That it is honest. That it is freely given.

And that it is never, ever something to be ashamed of.

[sexualmutation]

i need to have a big brother that i keep asking to be my valentine and he keeps saying no because he knows he’s entirely too old for me but eventually his sick desires take hold of him and he shoves his needy cock into my throat

and i’m just so happy because i finally get to be my big brother’s one and only, and nobody can take me away from him

[meimei-syndr0me]

yknow that thing in manga where the older brother gets sick and the little sister tries to nurse him back to health but she really isnt all that good at it even though shes really trying and theres always that scene where she tries to make him soup or something to make him feel better and the panel focuses on it and how she made it wrong but the big brother takes it and eats it anyway and compliments her and shes super proud of herself for being helpful?

i think about those scenes all the time