#Gender equality in government

[mapsontheweb]

Countries where there is not a single woman in government.

by geo.universe

[langernameohnebedeutung]

.

[madeofjules]

Peeta, in the arena: *saves Katniss's life before she saves his*

THG fandom: "Katniss didn't need Peeta's help in the arena, she was always saving his ass and would've won without him!"

[ivygorgon]

An open letter to the President & U.S. Congress; State Governors & Legislatures

Demanding Action: Stop the Assault on Transgender Rights!!

6 so far! Help us get to 10 signers!

I am writing urgently to address the alarming rise in anti-transgender legislation across our nation. Recent developments, such as the high-risk classification of Idaho for adults & Wyoming for youth due to a transgender care ban, demand immediate attention. The urgency of this matter cannot be overstated.

As your constituent, I am terrified by the discriminatory bills prohibiting gender-affirming care & bathroom bans sweeping our states impacting my rights. These laws strip Americans of their rights, dignity, and privacy, harming people of all ages, including cisgender Americans, women of color, and intersex individuals.

A recent article by Erin Reed highlighted the insurmountable & still-rising risks faced by transgender Americans due to legislative actions in various states. This onslaught of discriminatory laws, as outlined in Erin's updates, poses a direct threat to the rights & dignity of every transgender American, past, present, & future.

It is deeply troubling to witness states like Idaho escalating to a "high risk" level by passing bills that prohibit gender-affirming care for individuals of all ages. Similar trends across the nation, including bathroom bans & restrictions on identity documentation, create hostile environments that undermine the fundamental rights of transgender individuals to exist authentically & safely. Additionally, proposals like those in Alaska, which expose disadvantaged students to invasive scrutiny & domestic dangers, further exacerbate the urgency of this issue. Our transgender siblings in states like Florida also face immense challenges & danger due to discriminatory legislation by the ‘Sundown State.’ ‘Sundown’ meaning ‘Do Not Travel.’

As a nation that values equality & justice for all, we cannot remain silent in the face of such discriminatory legislation. These laws not only perpetuate stigma & discrimination but also pose a grave threat to the well-being & dignity of all American demographics.

The respected Union Soldier Pvt. Albert D. J. Cashier should be honored for his service to our country, & it is shameful that our society refuses to recognize & affirm his value, sacrifice, & American Rights. Any elected official who supports the bad-faith war on transgender Americans should be ashamed & embarrassed to champion & enforce unequal division rights.

I urge you to take a bold stand against any & all anti-transgender legislation & to introduce & support measures that uphold the rights & dignity of all Americans, regardless of their gender identity. Our elected officials have a responsibility to champion policies that promote inclusivity, respect, & equal rights for all Americans in our communities & across the nation, to include all our transgender, non-binary, gender-non-conforming, intersex, or cisgender Americans, regardless of their genital configuration or reproductive potential.

📱 Text SIGN PIPNQC to 50409

🤯 Liked it? Text FOLLOW IVYPETITIONS to 50409

💘 Q'u lach' shughu deshni da. 🏹 "What I say is true" in Dena'ina Qenaga

[daydreamerdrew]

All-Star Comics (1940) #8, published in October 1941

[soulofkole]

I missed land back. 😢

[coochiequeens]

Woman: Adult Human Female.

https://archive.ph/2023.11.01-142554/https://www.thenational.scot/news/23894878.women-scotland-lose-court-session-appeal-woman-definition/

FOR Women Scotland (FWS) has lost an appeal in the Court of Session over the legal definition of a woman.

The group had challenged a ruling that transgender women with a Gender Recognition Certificate (GRC) can legally be defined as women.

In a written ruling, Lady Dorrian, the Lord Justice Clerk, set out that a person “with a GRC in the female gender” is defined as a woman under the Equality Act (EA) 2010.

The appeal was brought after the Gender Critical group lost an initial case on the definition of a woman in legislation that aims to ensure gender balance on public boards.

Lady Haldane has previously ruled, after FWS requested a second judicial review of the Gender Representation on Public Boards (Scotland), that the meaning of sex is “not limited to biological or birth sex” but includes those in possession of a GRC.

In a further written judgment, released on Wednesday, Dorrian ruled that guidance under the UK legislation the Gender Recognition Act 2004, “does not conflate” two separate protected characteristics.

“A person with a GRC in their acquired gender possesses the protected characteristic of gender reassignment for the purposes of section 7 EA,” Dorrian (below) wrote in her conclusion.

"Separately, for the purposes of section 11 they also possess the protected characteristic of sex according to the terms of their GRC.

“For the purposes of section 11, individuals without a GRC, whether they have the protected characteristic of gender reassignment or not, retain the sex in which they were born.”

Dorrian added that “no conflation” of protected characteristics is involved.

“A person with a GRC in the female gender comes within the definition of “woman” for the purposes of section 11 of the EA, and the guidance issued in respect of the 2018 Act is lawful,” she added.

“The reclaiming motion is refused.”

FWS said in a statement they were “hugely disappointed” in the ruling.

“We are obviously still analysing the decision and will be speaking to our legal team in due course to consider the possibility of a further challenge,” they added.

We previously told how the gender representation legislation intends to ensure that non-executive members on public boards are made up of at least 50% women.

Scottish ministers had argued that those who were living as a woman or had gone through the GRC process could be defined as a woman within the legislation.

FWS argued that this did not accord with the separate definitions of women and transgender women under the Equality Act 2010 and voiced concerns about implications for single-sex spaces.

The group lost the initial judicial review in 2021, but were successful on appeal. The Scottish Government then revised the legislation, which now states that the definition of “woman” is defined by the Equality Act 2010 and the Gender Recognition Act 2004.

This meant that transgender women with a GRC would be considered women under the bill.

This led to FWS calling for a second judicial review, where Haldane ruled in favour of the Scottish Government.

This led to another appeal, which Dorrian ruled against on Wednesday.

[theadaptableeducator]

Towards Sustainable Futures: Deconstructing Colonialism, Nationalism, Imperialism, and Capitalism Through Anarchist Principles and Modern Alternatives

Voltairine de Cleyre was an anarchist and feminist thinker known for her critiques of authority and hierarchy, which are central to understanding her views on colonialism, nationalism, imperialism, and capitalism. Interconnectivity and Unsustainability Colonialism: De Cleyre would argue that colonialism is inherently unsustainable because it relies on the exploitation and domination of…

[head-post]

Taliban rejects criticism of morality law as “arrogance”

The Taliban government in Afghanistan responded to international criticism of recently codified morality rules by saying that rejecting legislation without an understanding of Islamic law demonstrated “arrogance.”

Women must cover themselves completely and not raise their voices in public, among other rules restricting women’s movements and behaviour, according to a 35-article law announced by the Justice Ministry on Wednesday.

The law imposes a wide range of provisions, including rules on men’s clothing and attendance at prayers, as well as bans on possession of photographs of living beings, homosexuality, animal fighting, playing music in public places, and non-Muslim holidays.

However, the United Nations (UN), human rights groups, and Afghans expressed concern that the legislation would lead to stricter enforcement of lifestyle and behavioural rules. The law is “firmly rooted in Islamic teachings” that should be respected and understood, chief government spokesman Zabihullah Mujahid stated on Monday night.

To reject these laws without such understanding is, in our view, an expression of arrogance.

The European Union declared on Monday that it was “appalled” by the decree, which “confirms and extends severe restrictions on the lives of Afghans.” EU foreign policy chief Josep Borrell said:

This latest decision is another serious blow undermining the rights of Afghan women and girls, which we cannot tolerate.

Borrell called on the Taliban to put an end to such “systematic abuses against Afghan women and girls.” He also warned that such restrictions could amount to gender-based persecution, a crime against humanity under the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (ICC).

However, Mujahid dismissed concerns about compliance with the law.

No rights will be violated, and no individual will be subjected to injustice.

Taliban rule is not recognised by any state, but has recently taken diplomatic steps, including participation in UN-coordinated talks on Afghanistan in Qatar.

Read more HERE

[townpostin]

Village Penalty Sparks Controversy Over Gender and Tradition

Up Mukhiya Fined for Visiting Sacred Site, Raising Questions of Discrimination Local leaders differ over the appropriateness of penalizing a female official for performing her duties at a traditional religious site. JAMSHEDPUR – A decision to penalize Karandih’s female Up Mukhiya for entering a sacred site has ignited a debate on gender roles and traditional practices. Monika Hembram, Up Mukhiya…

[ferretshark]

Project 2025 Cliff Notes:

1. Complete ban on abortions, without exceptions (pg. 449-503)

2. End marriage equality (pg. 545-581)

3. Elimination of unions and worker protections (pg. 581)

4. Defund the FBI and Homeland Security (pg. 133)

5. Eliminate federal agencies like the FDA, EPA, NOAA, and more (pg. 363-417)

6. Mass deportation of immigrants and incarceration in "camps" (pg. 133)

7. End birthright citizenship (pg. 133)

8. Cut Social Security (pg. 691)

9. Cut Medicare (pg. 449)

10. Eliminate the Department of Education (pg. 319)

11. Teach Christian religious beliefs in public schools (pg. 319)

12. Use public, taxpayer money for private religious schools (pg. 319)

13. End the Affordable Care Act (pg. 449)

14. Ban contraceptives (pg. 449)

15. Additional tax breaks for corporations and the 1% (pg. 691)

16. End civil rights & DEI protections in government (pg. 545-581)

17. Ban African American and gender studies in all levels of education (pg. 319)

18. End climate protections: (pg. 417)

19. Increase Arctic drilling (pg. 363)

20. Deregulate big business and the oil industry (pg. 363)

Not to increase anxiety, but I found this buried on Reddit. From six months ago. very good thing to have in your pocket so you are prepared

[ivygorgon]

AN OPEN LETTER to STATE GOVERNORS & LEGISLATURES

REDS! Let The Silly People Be Clowns! Protect the American Right to Free Speech!

2 so far! Help us get to 5 signers!

Recent court rulings in Indiana, Tennessee, and West Virginia have underscored the importance of upholding the rights of transgender Americans. The 7th Circuit Court of Appeals in Indiana ruled against misgendering in schools, while a federal judge in Tennessee blocked a drag ban, citing likely unconstitutionality. The Supreme Court declined to reinstate a sports ban in West Virginia, allowing a young transgender athlete to continue participating. Both of these rulings do miracles in protect cisgender and transgender students alike from discrimination, bullying, invasive scrutiny, and sexual assault.

These victories are a testament to the power of the judiciary in safeguarding the rights of marginalized communities. It is crucial to uphold the American right to free speech, which includes the art and performance of drag. Drag is not inherently sexual or inappropriate; it is a form of expression deserving protection. Therefore, it is requested that all bans on drag be dismissed, in line with the spirit of these recent court victories.

Protect the American Right to Free Speech! Drag as an art form and performance is not inherently sexual and should be recognized as protected speech. Let us dismiss all bans on drag and protect the American right to expression. Many of us, including you and your peers, have engaged in light-hearted instances of cross-dressing, emphasizing the playful nature of this expression. For the sake of our constitutional values, let us embrace diversity and respect for all forms of self-expression. For all that our constitution is worth, let the silly people be clowns!

▶ Created on April 5 by Ret. SGT Guild, Veteran Chapter Leader at SPARTApride.org

📱 Text SIGN PHFSPG to 50409

🤯 Liked it? Text FOLLOW IVYPETITIONS to 50409

💘 Q'u lach' shughu deshni da. 🏹 "What I say is true" in Dena'ina Qenaga

[tofueatingwokerati]

TRIGGER WARNING ⚠️ sensitive topics covered as well as references to self harm.

I was moved to my present address for my safety after being stalked, harassed and assaulted by a council tenant.

The police did nothing after I reported him beyond a virtual slap on the wrist by a PCSO (and people wonder why women don’t report these crimes) and the council did equally nothing to safeguard me.

It took two years to get me moved and only after I went to the government ombudsman, and revealed to my housing officer I was a rape survivor, was anything finally done.

A council manger, Paul Hadley (since retired I’ve been informed) said to me that it was my fault, that I must have been doing something to encourage him and in front of an antisocial behaviour officer present that the council were “not responsible for their tenants behaviour” and proceeded to deny me any safeguarding.

More complaints and ombudsman interventions would follow. Battle for equality rights never ends if you’re a women and happen to also have disabilities.

In the two years it took to get me moved I’d been in A&E as a suicide risk and was regularly self harming. My disabilities worsened and I ended up needing crutches as the pain intensified. My hips now “pop” regularly and I have permanent back pain after living through that ordeal.

After the ombudsman intervention I was given priority status to move. That came with more hurdles and barriers. Paul Hadley, again said I would get this property over his dead body. Somerset Council were consistently unprofessional, in breach of their duty of care and left me at risk consistently.

The housing officer I’d shared my rape experience with got me this home but they placed their own employment at risk to do it and said she would be paying for it for the rest of her time there. Being close to retirement I don’t think she cared what they thought of her any longer, she was an exceptional exception to an otherwise toxic council mentality towards tenants.

It shouldn’t need an employee to put their job in jeopardy to do what the law already specifies is their duty and role as a public service.

When I viewed my current home it was in awful condition and wasn’t accessible. I asked what work was being done to address this prior to my moving here and was advised nothing beyond pre-scheduled works example updating the boiler (which turned out to be faulty from day one). Beyond a decorating kit which I couldn’t safely use I was told repeatedly I could “always self fund” despite this being a provision under law and they had specific disability grants available for the works I was asking for, they refused me all accessibility and refused me an occupational assessment.

Whilst I was safe from one danger by moving here, the stalker, I was thrown into a new set of dangers to my health and safety.

As a vulnerable disabled person I was subject to bullying and harassment from neighbours very early on as they felt I was too young to be living in a bungalow without ever knowing, or caring about the context of my disabilities and what I was moved from.

One case of neighbour harassment became so extreme it ended in a protection order on their visitor.

The property, as already stated was in a terrible state. I photographed it all and sent it to legal counsel. They advised me not to move in (too late by this point) because it was not fit for human habitation and not up to council relet standards.

It took seven years to get the kitchen accessible and it’s still not 100% with faults from installation causing me undue resistance on my joints and risk of injury. I continue to battle that out with the council. It took going to the ombudsman again and the then CEO of the council to even get the kitchen adjusted under equality law.

The boiler has been faulty from day one. It has always done this thing where the pressure builds up and it eventually “burbs”. It’s so bad it sounds like it’s going to blow the cupboard door off. Eventually it started failing and I repeatedly needed to get out of hours engineers from the council to patch it up.

One year it was failing daily and I kept reporting it. The engineers kept having issue scanning the gas meter to log the call. They had a new system and it was having teething issues. This meant that every engineer would not have record of the previous days call out and openly treated me as a liar. Thankfully I had all the email communication to the gas repairs department and was able to prove this was a persistent problem.

During this time I was loosing mobility and dexterity in my joints, notably my hands and fingers. This meant I couldn’t keep myself safe. I was paying extra home help just to be safe, prep more meals and washing up as I couldn’t do anything myself (the kettle had to be repeatedly boiled as I had no hot water during all this).

I was huddled up in my bedroom trying to keep warm. As has been consistent with this council there was no safeguarding and no assistance. After almost a week of this and getting more & more unwell, I filed a formal complaint. I was given a tiny little heater and eventually compensated for the additional electric I was using as well as hourly cost of extra home help.

Since then it has failed again and again. In fact I dread every winter knowing it is going to fail.

Each and every time my mobility is materially impacted, because it usually fails overnight, meaning it’s had 8 hours for the temperature to plummet then hours more before an engineer can come out to patch it up.

In that time I loose mobility and dexterity. It happened again recently (dropping to 14°C by the time I woke to discover the boiler fault) and despite using electric heaters I simply could not warm up. Electric heaters are no substitute for central heating. It left me unable to make a meal and I was unable to get emergency home help to plug the care gap.

One engineer advised me that as long as they have parts they will patch it up indefinitely until it fails permanently. This is without any risk assessment to someone like myself materially impacted by temperature.

I filed another complaint upon many complaints at this point, with the council and they are refusing me a boiler update.

They’re refusing me a risk assessment and refusing me an occupational assessment whilst being fully informed this is having a detrimental impact on my health and safety.

It got so bad that I started to have intrusive thoughts and ended up on the phone to crisis. After an hour with them they were able to stabilise me. I then sought legal advise and as will come as no surprise was informed yes the council are in breach of equalities law but also they’re discriminating me on disabilities ground by refusing a risk assessment of my needs. The council have openly stated that I am getting “special treatment” any time works are carried out even though it ALWAYS falls under equalities/reasonable adjustments.

I even wrote to Duncan Sharkey, the CEO of Somerset Council. I got a short response from a different department repeating the deadlock to upgrading the boiler, refusing me equal access to refuse & recycling collection (thats a whole other story of discrimination over almost a decade) and telling me to take it up with the ombudsman.

So here we go again, I now need to go back to the ombudsman but this time I am looking at legal options (I even took out extra home insurance knowing this would happen) as well as taking this to the national press is my next step. Enough is enough!

Ultimately this goes beyond a boiler, beyond me as one person. This is about an institutional failing towards disabled people and a toxic mentality of blaming tenants when the council don’t want to spend money to carry out their legal duty. They hide behind policy and procedure to deny you equal access and place wilful barriers to health & safety by denying risk assessments.

I once had a council surveyor blame the damp in my previous home on my cats “heavy breathing”, telling me to get rid of the cats and in his report blamed me for not using the extractor fan. There was no extractor fan. Can you guess, yes the council had refused me an extractor fan in that property, but still the council blame the tenant for their failures. As an aside the damp was so severe along the entire block that the wall was collapsing in one property and they had to be relocated for their safety.

But yeah, blame the tenant, it’s Somerset Councils continued consistency, blame the tenant and discriminate, all to save a few pennies whilst taking rent money from us all.

Rouge landlords are not consigned to the private sector!

[greenthestral]

Breaking Barriers: Achieving Gender Parity in National Political Leadership

In a world that continually strives for progress and equality, it is disheartening to realize that the representation of women in national political leadership still lags behind. Despite significant strides in gender equality, the road to achieving equal representation for women and men in politics remains long and arduous. At the current pace, experts predict that it would take another 40 years for women to break through the glass ceiling and attain an equal share of political power. In this article, we will delve into the current state of gender parity in politics, explore the challenges that women face, and highlight the crucial steps required to accelerate the journey towards a more equitable political landscape.

The Current Landscape of Gender Representation in Politics

The representation of women in politics has improved over the years, but progress has been slow and uneven. In many nations, women make up a significant portion of the electorate, yet their presence in elected positions remains disproportionately low. As of today, women represent just a fraction of the total national political leadership across the globe, with many countries yet to witness a female head of state or government.

Various factors contribute to this disparity, ranging from cultural norms and societal expectations to systemic barriers that inhibit women from participating fully in politics. Patriarchal systems often perpetuate male dominance in political spheres, discouraging women from pursuing political careers or subjecting them to intense scrutiny when they do.

The Challenges Women Face in Political Leadership

Breaking into the male-dominated political arena presents a myriad of challenges for women. Some of the most significant obstacles include:

1. Gender Bias and Stereotyping: Women in politics often face gender bias and stereotyping, with their abilities and qualifications questioned solely based on their gender. This prejudice can undermine their credibility and make it harder for them to gain the trust of constituents.

2. Lack of Support Networks: Political networks have traditionally been male-centric, making it difficult for women to access the same support and resources that men do. Without strong networks and mentorship opportunities, women may struggle to advance their political careers.

3. Balancing Family and Politics: The expectation for women to balance family responsibilities with political roles can be overwhelming and may dissuade them from seeking leadership positions.

4. Gender-Based Violence and Harassment: Women in politics face an increased risk of gender-based violence and harassment, both online and offline. Such attacks can deter them from engaging in public service and stifle their voices.

5. Electoral Systems: Some electoral systems inadvertently disadvantage female candidates, making it harder for them to secure party nominations or win elections.

The Importance of Gender Parity in Politics

Gender parity in politics is not just a matter of fairness; it is essential for a thriving democracy and inclusive governance. Here's why achieving equal representation matters:

1. Diverse Perspectives: Women and men often have different life experiences and priorities, which bring diverse perspectives to the table. Inclusion of women in political leadership ensures that a wider range of issues and concerns are addressed effectively.

2. Policy Outcomes: Studies have shown that women in political leadership are more likely to prioritize social issues, such as education, healthcare, and gender equality. Consequently, achieving gender parity can lead to more balanced and equitable policy outcomes.

3. Strengthening Democracy: A more balanced representation of women and men in politics strengthens democratic institutions by reflecting the diversity of the population and fostering greater trust in the political system.

4. Role Modeling and Inspiration: When young girls see women holding positions of power and leadership, it inspires them to aspire to similar roles, challenging gender norms and perpetuating a cycle of progress.

Steps to Accelerate Gender Parity in Political Leadership

While the road to gender parity in politics may be long, several actionable steps can be taken to accelerate progress:

1. Quotas and Affirmative Action: Introducing quotas or affirmative action measures can help increase the number of women in political leadership. Several countries have successfully implemented such policies to improve gender representation.

2. Electoral Reforms: Reforming electoral systems to promote gender balance, such as introducing proportional representation, can create more opportunities for women to be elected.

3. Encouraging Political Participation: Encouraging and supporting women's participation in politics from an early age can build a stronger pipeline of future female leaders.

4. Challenging Gender Norms: Breaking down traditional gender norms and stereotypes is crucial to creating a more inclusive political environment.

5. Addressing Online Harassment: Implementing measures to combat online harassment and abuse against women in politics can protect their safety and freedom to engage in public discourse.

Conclusion

Gender parity in national political leadership is not an unattainable dream; it is a necessary goal that we must relentlessly pursue. By understanding the challenges women face in politics, recognizing the significance of equal representation, and taking decisive steps to break down barriers, we can hasten the day when women and men stand side by side as equal partners in shaping the future of our nations. Let us collectively work towards creating a world where women's voices are heard and their leadership celebrated, ultimately enriching the fabric of our democracies and societies. The journey may be long, but it is a journey worth embarking upon - a journey towards a more just and inclusive world.

What's In It For Me? (WIIFM)

In this blog article, you will discover why achieving gender parity in national political leadership is crucial for everyone. Understanding the benefits of equal representation for women and men will not only promote fairness and inclusivity but also lead to better policy outcomes, stronger democracies, and a more balanced society. Learn how breaking down barriers and supporting women's participation in politics can create a brighter future for all.

Join the Movement: Advocate for Gender Parity in Politics!

It's time to take action and work towards achieving equal representation for women and men in national political leadership. Support candidates who champion gender equality, engage in conversations about the importance of women's leadership, and challenge gender norms in politics. Together, we can accelerate progress and create a more inclusive and equitable political landscape. Let's build a world where every voice matters, regardless of gender!

Blog Excerpt

As the world strives for progress and equality, the representation of women in national political leadership remains a pressing challenge. In this insightful article, we explore the current state of gender parity in politics and the barriers that hinder women from accessing leadership positions. Delve into the importance of equal representation and how it impacts policy outcomes and democracy. Discover actionable steps to accelerate progress and create a more inclusive political environment. Join us on this journey towards a future where women and men share political power equally!

Meta description in 320 characters to appear in the Google Search Engine

Discover why achieving gender parity in national political leadership is crucial. Explore challenges, benefits, and steps to accelerate progress. Join the movement for an inclusive political landscape!

[allthecanadianpolitics]

The federal government has introduced legislation that would require charities providing reproductive health services to state clearly whether they offer abortion or abortion referrals. Organizations that fail to clearly tell their clients whether they provide these services could risk losing their charitable status. Marci Ien, the minister for women and gender equality, said Tuesday the legislation is meant to combat the spread of "misinformation" by some charities that operate crisis pregnancy centres. "People are walking in the doors of pregnancy crisis centres expecting to receive information on all options that are available to them," Ien told a press conference. "They are met with organizations that are imposing their anti-choice convictions on them."

Continue Reading.

Tagging: @newsfromstolenland