#videos of court cam

[sparklymentalitypanda]

When Crazy Karens Have Extreme Meltdowns: The Best of Karens!

Welcome to our latest video, where we dive into the hilarious and often shocking world of "Karens"! In this compilation, we showcase some of the wildest and most outrageous Karen meltdowns caught on camera. Let's see when crazy Karens have extreme meltdowns. 👉 Subscribe to my channel to stay tuned:    / @instantkarenkarma  

From epic customer service fails to outrageous demands and hilarious outbursts, these moments will leave you both laughing and shaking your head in disbelief. Ever wondered what happens when a customer takes their complaints to the next level? Our video features a range of scenarios—from absurd requests at restaurants to confrontations in retail stores. You'll witness Karens challenging employees, demanding to speak to the manager, and making the most bizarre complaints you can imagine. Each clip highlights the dramatic and sometimes over-the-top reactions that have gone viral across social media.

But this video isn't just about the meltdowns. We also take a closer look at the dynamics of customer service and the challenges that employees face in dealing with difficult customers. The service industry is often underappreciated, and our goal is to shine a light on both the absurdity of these encounters and the resilience of those on the front lines. You'll hear firsthand accounts from employees who have had to navigate these tricky situations, offering insight into how they manage to keep their cool amidst the chaos.

[monicascot]

AMERICA'S MOST HATED MOST WANTED FEDERAL CONVICTS | FROM INCARCERATED TO INCORPORATED

In this video, we will explore the stories of some of America's most hated and wanted federal convicts. We will look at their crimes, how they were apprehended and their current status.

[ravi-is-my-beloved]

My 8x04 Thoughts & Summary

As always, there may be some things I leave out, however, this is a summary of the majority of the episode.

911 Spoilers under the cut!!

The fact that Gerrard really thought Buck (out of everyone) would make a list of who to fire is funny. Poor Buck hated that, but it really wasn't even a storyline for Buck. It just served purpose to reveal to the audience that Councilwoman Ortiz is the one who put Gerrard back into the 118.

I had a feeling the body cams would come into play with the Hen-Ortiz storyline, but I had thought it would end badly for Hen. I was stressing during the cheerleader call, thinking the fact that they did a partial REBOA (or however it's spelled) in the ambulance would backfire on Hen. I'm so glad the body cams ended up being the thing that gave evidence to Hen's (accurate) claim to Ortiz being revengeful and having a vendetta against Hen.

Bobby really heard Gerrard gush about being a consultant for Hotshots and was like "I can kill two birds with one stone." The way he used Gerrard's own ego to turn Gerrard against Ortiz? 10/10. Now not only is Hen and Karen getting Mara back, but he now can come back to the 118.

But also, that's not the only thing that happens with Bobby this episode. As many of us predicted, Athena wanted to rebuild the old house and of course Bobby wanted something new. And of course they ended up having a two-minute talk near the end of the episode (after seeing Bobby stare at the architect plans of the old house for like a few scenes) and decided to build a house that wasn't something Michael built but rather it'd be something they'd create together for them as a couple.

My major gripe with this storyline is it felt like it was just shoved into an already-packed episode. We didn't get to see much conflict between Bobby and Athena and it just felt lackluster (to me) when it got resolved so quickly.

The way they made Hen and Karen cry because their court hearing to reinstate their foster license had the result of them being ordered no contact with Mara (of course because the judge was in Ortiz's back pocket)... I hated it. But I'm so glad they had Mara come home at the end of this episode, if it had taken longer for her to come home, I wouldn't have been able to handle it. That little video Mara did before CPS took her from the Wilson house where she talked about what she wanted for her upcoming birthday and how she called Hen "Mama"? Almost made me cry.

And of course, we can't leave out Eddie's little storyline. They are putting that man through the meat grinder. The cheerleader kid thinks Eddie's his dad (somehow) after being brought back from the brink of death and we get the saddest look from Eddie. His storyline is the only one that didn't get resolved here and we see him be mad that the cheerleader's dad wasn't talking to his son and we see why he's mad about that: because Eddie is trying to be there for Chris and he can't because Chris doesn't want him to be there. And so he's trying to reunite the cheerleader and his dad and he ends up doing it after being like "You're a grown adult, you should be there for your kid" when he talks to the kid's father.

So that's the gist of everything. I committed the tiger call but that's everything in terms of storylines in the episode. As for what I'm most excited for what's in the future, I can't wait to see the building of Athen and Bobby's house and I can't wait to see Eddie and Chris get reunited.

While I did have a few gripes with this episode (mainly in how Buck was just there this episode and how the Bobby-Athena storyline had not that much screen time), I did still really like the episode and how it ended. This was a Wilson family centric episode and I think it did the Hen-Ortiz conflict as well as it could have done.

[foreveric]

Imagine Keanu's characters's serach history on their computer.

𝜗𝜚 ࣪˖ ִ𐙚 hol' up, lemme cook.

john wick:

most effective guns

vintage cars

how to care for a dog

kevin lomax:

best ways to make your wife cum

romantic restaurants near me

ongoing court cases

jack traven:

body cam videos

cute date ideas for girlfriend

local crime news

john constantine:

how to cope with cancer

demon possessions

near-death experiences

[dailyunsolvedmysteries]

The Harrowing case of Ashley Vigil

52-year-old Brian Kenneth Urban entered Paula Vigil’s life in 2014. “I told him my life is doctors’ appointments and surgeries,” she said. Paula took care of her daughter, Ashley Vigil, who suffered from a rare genetic disorder known as Rett Syndrome.

“Doctors told us there was very little likelihood she would make it to see her 11th birthday,” Vigil said. “Together, we could beat anything.” As an adult, Ashley's seizures grew worse, and she was losing weight. Paula installed nanny cams while working with Ashley's doctors to figure out what was happening.

Vigil discovered Urban moving her daughter, undressing her, raping her, putting her diaper back on and then moving her again.

“She could beat anything, except for him,” Paula said. Urban was arrested right after she made the discovery.

Video after video captured the crime — something that would be watched by only a few for about 20 to 30 minutes in court. Ashley died not long before the man who raped her was sentenced to prison.

In court, Urban blamed high levels of testosterone, steroids and medication for his actions. “My testosterone levels were elevated to be extremely high in a short amount of time . . . I was in a dream-like state, where reality felt like a dream,” he said in front of packed courtroom.

Dozens of volunteers showed up on the day of Urban’s sentencing to voice and show their support for Ashley. Ashley’s empty chair sat amongst a crowd of people who were there to be her voice.

“I thought I was angry before, but now that she died, I’m so angry now,” Paula said.

Urban pled guilty to five felony convictions. Judge Stephen Nelson in the West Jordan Third District Court sentenced him to serve his five convictions consecutively. This means Urban will serve five years to life for each of his two rape convictions and one to 15 years for each of his forcible sexual abuse convictions.

[cod-dump]

*Gaz and Soap are in Price’s office*

Price: Care to explain where you two went last night?

Soap: What do you mean? We were here all night!

Price: Really now?

Gaz: Yes!

Price: *wordlessly plays a video on the tv behind him*

*Video shows ring cam footage of Soap walking through the court yard eating a tub of ice cream. Gaz suddenly runs full force past him, snatching the ice cream as he goes*

Soap: That-

Price: Shh! Keep watching

*Soap runs out of view of the camera in pursuit of Gaz. Price fasts forward a couple hours. Soap runs past the camera screaming as Gaz chases after him in a golf cart*

Soap & Gaz: *both wide eyed and avoiding looking at Price*

Price: Where’s the golf cart boys?

[rhysdarbinizedarby]

‘Night Court’ – ‘The Duke’s a Hazard’ Post-Mortem Interview with Rhys Darby

NIGHT COURT -- "The Duke's a Hazard" Episode 212 -- Pictured: Rhys Darby as Alistair -- (Photo by: Nicole Weingart/NBC)

Rhys Darby is an accomplished actor and comedian that has graced many a popular and iconic franchise with his many skills in both arenas, and this week… he graced another. For Rhys played Alistair, the refined love of one Donna ‘Gurgs’ Gurganous on this week’s episode of Night Court on NBC, and we had the distinct honor of sitting down with Rhys to discuss all things, Night Court.

John Betancourt: I would love to start off by getting to know what it was that attracted you to the character of Alistair?

Rhys Darby: Well, I know the show, Night Court, watched it as a kid with my mum, have fond memories, and she passed a while ago. So, I felt like “I've got to do this, I want to do this for mum, because we used to watch the show together back in the day.” And the character, I can easily fit into those shoes. It's someone who's a posh Duke, that is a little bit clueless, looks down their nose at people but needs to try to fit in and needs to learn how to be bit more human. So those are all those kinds of traits that I like playing, I find the comedy that comes from that character is well within my wheelhouse. So, I decided to do it.

John Betancourt: Something I’ve noticed about Night Court that I think is wonderful, is how the quirks of every guest star are fully fleshed out in every episode. How did you as an actor bring those to life and make them feel so real?

Rhys Darby: I think that's the key with comedy is, make it look realistic. Because as soon as -- you can kind of over accentuate things to a degree, but it's got to be believable. And when you go past that line of believability, you don't relate. And I think it's finding that right line and kind of swaying and playing on that line. And that's where you get the physical comedy. You know, people in general don't necessarily, aren't necessarily hilarious when they're doing something physical. Unless well, certainly when, unless it's done by accident, in which case you do that thing where you laugh at someone and then you go, “Oh, I shouldn't have.” But you know, it's one of the reasons America's Funniest Home Videos was such a huge hit. But it's kind of like trying to find a grounded, slightly grounded character that is also an open buffoon. And you've got to fit the tone right of the show. And once I started working with the cast, I’d already seen some episodes of the new Night Court. So, I knew what the what the vibe was. And it's always been silly. So, it's always been like, a touch out of touch of reality. And that's my favorite type of comedy. So, it was it was easy to fit in.

John Betancourt: Now you’ve spent a lot of your career working in single camera shows, but you have done multi-cam. What do you have to do as an actor to prepare for that kind of shift?

Rhys Darby: Yeah, I forgot a little bit because I've done multi-cam a few years ago, I forgot how many times the script changes. So, I’d turn up at the beginning of the week, and like, start learning the lines. And then the next day, it's changed, the next day it’s changed again. So, by halfway through the week, I was like “Right, forget the lines. Just concentrate on being funny.” (Laughter) And the other, the other part of it so yeah, so prep isn't a big one. It's really kind of like, the fun of nailing the two different parts of it, which are the prerecorded pieces, which I had fun, I was able to do some improv in, so the subway scene. And then, and then there was a couple of other scenes, but there's that side of it. And then there's the completely opposite side where you've got an audience and you're performing in front of a crowd.

So, it's the best of both worlds. And I kind of kind of forgot, I think I kind of forgot that some stuff is recorded. And I was like, “Okay, we've got to learn this like a play.” And you don't. So, on the night, you also get a few takes, you know, and the crowd loves it when you guys change it up, when the writers come in and go “Try this line. Try that line.” So, yeah there’s fun to be had. And I can see why multi-cams are still a thing because it's a real coming together of all of these different kinds of features, to including the audience, that are that are participating in and helping create the final product and making this classic American art form. So, I think it's cool.

John Betancourt: So, I have to ask, how much of that improv stayed in the final cut?

Rhys Darby: There were some pieces, yeah. There were some… I have to have another look at it. But definitely in the subway scene when I took my coat off, and it fell on the ground. And then I just said something about “That's gone, we have to burn it.” That was all made up. There was probably another little piece that I had with Dave Foley, when we're having the dinner table all sorted, we're having little cups of tea, when he came in. And then stylistically I just chose how I was going to walk and how I was going to look, give my looks to the actors. And I changed that up every time as well. So, there was for, for a show that you know, for multi-cam, that definitely don't allow too much improv, there was certainly… the director was open to letting me have a few, do a few extra “Darby Takes,” shall we say?

John Betancourt: Now something that has come up often in discussions with the Night Court cast, is how the live audience just offers a vibe or energy. I’m curious as to what it does for you as an actor?

Rhys Darby: Well, as a stand up, you know, I'm used to having an audience laugh at me. It helps with the timing, it helps… give you a slightly raised performance, because you can hear a whole bunch of people laughing. So, you're not… you're doing.. you're matching the right tone that is required for that show. So, you're not, you know, subtleties aren't really going to play. So, yeah, I think it's just fun to do. It's fun for anyone who hasn't done that kind of thing. It's a good discipline to have down, at least give them a try.

John Betancourt: So, I can hear it in your voice now, just how much you relished this experience, what did you enjoy the most about working on this episode?

Rhys Darby: I think just working with the cast, I think, you know, meeting John (Larroquette) and the rest of them and having them be a real sweet family and welcoming me as a guest onto the show, working with Dave Foley again, because I haven't worked with him for a long time. So, catching up with him. And just being on a show, that's a bit of an institution. You know, I think those are the those are all the highlights, and the fact that it was just filming down the road from my house. So very easy.

John Betancourt: Oh, I bet the short walk made it amazing.

Rhys Darby: I don't often, I don't often get that. Because I'm always, like, having to fly somewhere or go stay somewhere for a couple of months or whatever. So that convenience, plays a lot into actors, jobs, it doesn't always happen.

John Betancourt: Now, regarding the legacy of the show, why do you think Night Court continues to endure?

Rhys Darby: Well, a number of things, the writing, you know, John Larroquette’s performance. And I think that just the nature of the show. How every week, you're gonna get a different situation of people that are in court, for some reason, for the most stupid idea, stupid reasons. And the interplay between the characters and their lives. It's just simply said, it's just a really good setting for a sitcom.

John Betancourt: Last question I have for you today, what does it mean to you personally to now be part of this franchise?

Rhys Darby: It means a lot. Because I've done a lot of stuff in my career. And I've been lucky enough to be part of some pretty big franchises, some pretty cool legacies. And when it comes to comedy, this was one of them. So that's why it was a no brainer to take. And yeah, and seeing the final result, seeing how funny it was, I was like, “Good, nailed it! Next!” (Laughter)

This interview has been lightly edited and condensed for clarity.

Source: Nerds That Geek

[cozzzynook]

ever since I've read that one post of yours 'bout bee being a cam bot and shockwave being a viewer of his; I just get this mental image of shockwave uh "doing something to himself" when viewing one of bee's videos

btw, sorry for this weird ask 😭 , I just wanted to get this off my chest lmfao :')

but, how would shockwave react to seeing bee at boot camp knowing his past? (besides just being down bad for bee lmfao) like, would he intentionally try to get close to bee in hopes of something? considering that in the previous post about this, neutrals and 'cons envy those two bots bee had with him in a video.

also, does almost every neutral and 'con know of the can bot "queen bee"?

Its not weird no worries.

Besides having a huge crush on Bee, Shockwave genuinely wants to persuade Bee to join the decepticons or just remain neutral. Truthfully he doesn’t want to see the bot join autobots knowing how mistreated he will be and its during their first private meeting that Bee shares his reasons for being in the academy.

He needed safety and to hide.

Shockwave is more than happy to provide him a better alternative while fawning over Bee who knows Longarm Prime is actually Shockwave from the moment he heard him speak.

“You were a really big fan Shock, of course I recognize you even in your disguise. Maybe get a voice mod just in case.”

Bee helped Shockwave remain undercover while Shockwave unknowingly helped Bee into the arms of Prowl and Jazz who are the pair of bots who got to frag Bumblebee on multiple occasions. ( if i said something else well i’m changing it for now since i just really like this idea 🤷🏽‍♀️)

Jazz & prowl are conjunx and spark bonded, they would video with Bee when he was neutral and Prowl was still avoiding the draft.

Shockwave got Bee on the repair crew and thats one of the reasons Prowl decided to stay because he and Jazz genuinely like Bee and want to court him. Shockwave wants to court Bee too until he meets Blurr, Shockwave was just really into his frame while Jazz and Prowl like Bee for Bee. But Bee’s Spark belongs only to his sparkling who he sneaks on board and shocks the crew with.

Bee does not tell any bot who the sire is and barely lets them around his sparkling save for Ratchet who does a diagnostic on the kid. Bee’s kid likes pulling on Ratchet’s red antenna and enjoys trying to chase Prowl and Jazz so Bee just has to let his sparkling spend time with them while watching.

Jazz and Prowl use this to their advantage, they like sparklings and don’t mind starting early if it means getting Bee.

Yes, pretty much all the decepticons and neutrals know Queen Bee. Oddly enough none of them hound him save for a very small few but those bots get dealt with quickly. Its really autobots that Bee knows are a danger and so he usually lives in neutral or decepticon territory for safety meaning he knows a lot of them.

Idk if this is what you wanted but this is what my brain cooked up. Hope you enjoy.

And as always Free Palestine 🇵🇸 Congo 🇨🇩 & Sudan 🇸🇩

[be-the-glenn-to-my-maggie]

If i have time once i dfinish w my tests, ill try turning this into a fic--

An actual, legal custody battle between the Sullys and Quaritch, who would win?

The Sullys have a history with Child neglect. A good lawyer could make a case for verbal and emotional abuse from Neytiri, as well as physical, if the cut from the ship comes into play (also p sure she tries to attack him multiple times in the comics). You could argue that they can't provide a safe environment for him, and they could use his lack of schooling against them.

Quaritch definitely engaged in some physical abuse, with the whole 'pointing a gun at him, kidnapping him, bringing him to be tortured' thing. However, a very good lawyer could argue that it was his right, as Spiders bio dad, to bring him home, as the Sullys nor anyone else went through the legal human (or na'vi) trouble of adopting him.

And on top of that, if they reviewed the actual torture video of Spider (p sure they got security cams) it would look like Quaritch never actively partook in the torture, and was even the one who stopped it when it became clear that Spider was at risk of serious injury (nose bleeding in a mind tearing machine means bad news, methinks) (I'd think he'd start having some kind of stroke?) Then theres the whole "provide better schooling, housing etc etc".

The Sullies lawyer could argue that Quaritch is the reason he was tortured, and that he held him hostage for months. Could argue that he was putting him in danger by bringing him on that ship (Jake "brings his kids to the battlefield" Jake has no rral leg to stand on) (i mean, cmon, Lo'ak is 14!!! Make him help the wounded or smth)

I think a proper custody battle fic would be cool, so I'm really mad that I have to write it

>:(((

This is the third legal battle on Pandora ask I've gotten. Don't take my response personally and please do what you wish, these are just my opinions and thoughts, as I've really been stewing on it. You know I'm all about the implications of things, again this is not at all at you or the other anon you just got me thinking.

I gotta be honest, this premise does not do it for me at all. I don't vibe with the legal system applying to the Na'vi, first of all. They are not US citizens, they are not even on Earth. Applying a legal system to them that they have no knowledge of and have no reason to follow is another aspect of colonization and genocide that is a huge issue still today. Applying our standards and morals to other communities is wrong. The legal system in the US and Canada has a huge problem of taking indigenous children from the indigenous community and placing them with white families today. Eradicating future cultural generations is a genocidal tactic. This is not the same as the situation with Spider, but a legal battle with the Na'vi over a child has those echos to me. There are only the laws of Eywa on Pandora, why should they be judged on arbitrary rules that apply on Earth? I don't understand it; it has such a colonialist mindset. There is no way to even enforce a ruling, the Na'vi don't have courts and therefore the jury would be human and heavily biased, and there isn't a judge and they would also be biased if there was. Even Spider does not know or follow the laws of Earth, he is not a US citizen. The Na'vi have not been following proper hunting ordinances, if US law applies the game wardens are gonna have to do a lot of ticketing and fining of the Na'vi's no money to fix that. At the very least it's wrong, at the most it's a slippery slope into US law applying to the Na'vi on Pandora which is a MAJOR colonizing step. We cannot even say that Lo'ak and Neteyam should not be on a battlefield, in Na'vi culture Neteyam is fully an adult member of the clan and we are told Na'vi mature faster than humans. Judging that as putting kids in danger is looking at things from a distinctly western and human perspective, when the Na'vi would likely see Jake as overprotective.

Second of all, I do find the concept of treating Quaritch as an actual viable parent as ludicrous. He is, again, a war criminal who has committed genocide. A great many of his war crimes were committed against Spider?? Arguing that anything Quaritch did was his legal right to bring Spider home is crazy, and also saying Spider wasn't adopted by the Sully's makes neglect not even something they can talk about in court as they weren't his guardians ever. Also saying Quaritch saved Spider from torture is laughable. He put Spider there, everything that happens to Spider in the RDA is entirely Quaritch's fault and responsibility. Taking a civilian war prisoner is a war crime. A child? Double war crimes. If this was a court, which again, I really don't like the idea of the American legal system applying to the Na'vi, Quaritch has a lot more problems them custody arguments. Man is in jail for the rest of his life, he's not getting custody.

[malevolententity]

Okay but that makes so much sense??? Like until you said it, it didn't really click just How Much Edward broke the masquerade but i think that fact has like, been itching at the back of my mind when it came to him and all the shit he pulled.

And the bit abt the Weylin twins too??? Like ohhhh so many things seem to click into place with your explanation.

And it just makes the fact that the all the participants in that game being masquerade breakers seem even more like. Manipulative on top of the fact we know he was also going to have Shilo endorse him. Like a "See? I hate masquerade breakers too. Ignore everything else I've been doing." thing.

Anyways if u have any more essays to drop on anything abt how the suckening uses or bends things relating to vtm please drop them. I crave more knowledge.

welcome to my sabbat truthing!!! i am so glad i made sense!!!

arent the camarilla all so fucked up in claiming everyone as masquerade breakers but then they do shit that is Also So Fucking Bad For The Masquerade!!!! the camarilla have always kinda been "do as i say not as i do" but charlie like truly hits the nail on the head with the complacency of the entire court. i am actually so obsessed with his world building and the implications of so many little things.

the whole entire finale is so manipulative and diabolical and i love it. edwards such a hypocrite it is so fun to watch an edward be on their high horse knowing he blatantly does worse than like oh god that one nossie that ordered uber eats Exactly One Time. but! thats how the masquerades played the higher you are in the hierarchy the less rules apply to you unless someone stages a coup. and the lower you are the worse a punishment is for a single infraction.

like the reason that gabriel is a masquerade breacher is Slightly because emizel went off the rails and anything your childe does reflects on the sire for choosing poorly. but its also very much because within the camarilla every single turning has to be sanctioned by the prince! emizel was an accident. gabriel freaks out because woah weird guy just bit me back. but also because that is a major masquerade breach according to the cams. and by letting emizel have the chance to live instead of immediately killing him gabe knew he was eventually going to die because of this choice. and just oughggh <- i genuinely cant remember if charlie ever explained this at any point

vampire the masquerade is a wonderful gothic horror ttrpg that is so so fun if you love to roleplay the complexities of personal relationships and also political intrigue. theres also video games. if you like video games you should play the video games.

i will get to writing more suckening essays in the future dont you worry 🫡

[unsavory-melon]

I Have Made a Slightly Fucked up Hypothetical Involving Time Stopping

trigger warning: non consensual, rape under the cut

(i apologise for the topic, i needed a serious crime for a part of this post {they are utilised towards the end underneath the cut.} )

@pixieskie

I have highlighted the questions in purple while the context for them is in white. If you like, please reblog with your thoughts and answers

NOW, to get started, lets assume you have the power to stop time and move about freely while time is stopped. In other words time is stopped for everything except you

now, if someone shoots a bullet and you stop time, then you walk up to the floating bullet and turn it towards the person who shot it, when time restarts the bullet will fly in the direction of the shooter (because you moved it)

so whats to say this doesnt work for photons? (i promise its not all physics but its a bit of it)

if you move through a space, then the photons you collide with would be sent in a new direction and could meet eyes or cameras allowing them to see you right?? so would you be able to see someone who is moving through stopped time?

and if the human eye isn't enough, what about a slow motion camera? If you could slow down the footage enough, would you be able to get a watchable video?

if you went up to your friend when time has stopped and stood in front of their face for a VEERRRY long time, would they then be able to perceive you?

okay moving on from the physics,

lets say that if , while time is stopped, you can make time work for an object as it works for you if you touch it and have the will to do so

so if you want to make a car work, and you touch it would only the part or the car that you touch experience time or the whole car?

in other words, Do you think that this aspect of your ability depends on what you perceive as an object or is there some definition of what counts for this (i assume object can refer to a living thing)

now going forward, i will be referring to the possibly triggering topics mentioned above

now, lets say this power lies with a certain sick fuck, lets call them 'A'

lets take into consideration the following senario:

A has stopped time and walks out into the street and does those nasty things to a woman (lets call her B )while time is stopped. Would B be able to perceive it? perhaps this is similar to the question above

now, lets say A has stopped time and once again finds B in the street. However this time he allows her to experience time as he does. Now that he has done this he goes on to harass her as any other sick fuck would, only time is stopped.

If he has left suitable DNA evidence like hair or semen which can be used to identify him, but he has an alibi that "holds up" as this is done when time is stopped can A be convicted of his crimes? (an example of an alibi can be: he went to store and stood in front of a security cam, stopped time and did all of this and came back to the same spot and restarts time )

What if A lives in a different city, travels to B's city while time is stopped, does the same thing and uses the same alibi? Could he be convicted then? (to clarify, A would not be seen on security cams while time is stopped )

so B has DNA evidence of what A has done but A has a seemingly airtight alibi, How would a court rule in this case?

if you put yourself in the shoes of a fair judge who has no knowledge of this time stopping business, and also wants to avoid a false accusation and put a rapist where they belong in jail, How would you rule

[larryspinkplanet28]

all the men accused in the industry had bots defending them, liam is the only one who didnt. Instead there are bots every time kate's face is shown in videos and pictures. Why we dont get these bots when we are posting #justiceforliam? other celebs had them. All the men accused with a campaign defending them were proven guilty, maya didnt even start a court case she just accused him on tiktok, how is that even legal? by legal terms that is defamation and hate speech. how can you just accuse someone without proofs and on tiktok, without having a court case? and i remind you that, she comes from a family of rich lawyers who are famous for organizing the most expensive party of maya's quinceañera, so she's not a vulnerable women with no support system or money. She also sent liam a cease and desist but then she asked him why are you silent? Her book even starts with: nobody will believe you cos i'm famous, the same book she said at 1st was fiction, then said it was based on her and liam. That in itself is a red flag and a clear proof she used the fandom to manipulate them against him, even paid fans to fake texts messages, when we got to know he didnt even hv access to his phone. so much so, he doesnt even know spanish, but sent text msgs to sex workers in spanish? and then in broken english? apart numerous other inconstancies that the media keeps on feeding us, we dont know the real age of maya, the info keeps changing, yet it's liam who is blamed for dating a minor, if that was the case arent the parents to blame? under 18 ur under parents custody, if they let her date him, it's on them, we got to know tnx to Blake lively's scandal, that smear campaigns exist for real. smtg that this fandom has spoken abt for yrs, so what makes u think that, liam wasnt a victim of a smear campaign? we're the twitter users r the only ones spkg abt this. and if u want to go for the drugs narrative, instead of shitting on him for it, why dont u ask, y he did them in 1st place? meanwhile kate and maya also did drugs and alcohol, but u dont judge them cos they r women you wet your panties for, but if it's liam u hate on him? so much so, that your lovely maya is posting vids of her drinking alcohol on cam but u wont call her an alcoholic cos she is a woman ''blah blah misogyny, blah blah'' cry me a river, she is not a victim, liam is. johnny D was also a coke user, yet u didnt judge him when u were hashtagging justiceforjohnnydepp bc at the time u said, js cos he was a coke user it doesnt mean he was an abuser, and yet u use that against liam, bc u love to hate him. there is a lot to say, but i'll stop here for now.

[hrryshoney]

tennis girlie and matty maybe developing a reputation for pushing the limits with pda and indecency at events 🤭

that comment u made about the edits had me THINKIN

oh u get me badly!!! yea i feel even if girlie tries to stray away from the narrative, even she knows that they are very much On Top of eachother at like, all times. (this is like, the first Actual written blurb that we have gotten for them so kinda cool)

When Matty immediately lifts you into his arms after a game, you think nothing of it. He’s a supportive boyfriend, he’s there for you, after all. When Matty pours water into your mouth during your break, you chalk it up to him being a boy. And when he’s always tugging on your skirt and ponytail? Well, he’s just affectionate.

And when announcers bring it up during your matches? You think they’re trying to take the spotlight away from you. Though your boyfriend is very much in the spotlight too, do they have to bring it up at every game? Or when you accompany Matty to one of his award ceremonies with the guys, and his hand always lingers on your waist. The paparazzi always catching you two in less than ideal moments, lips always locked. How most of the pictures from The Brits Red Carpet are just you and Matty hanging off of each other, his lips planted on your cheek. When Matty sends you back to the court with a kiss on your lips and a firm smack on your ass.

So, yeah. Maybe you two are always on top of each other. But so what? It’s not hurting anyone, certainly. There’s proof enough when Matty grinds his hips into yours at one of his after parties, or after your match. When you win a game and he pulls you in for a bruising kiss, or when The Band wins an award and you’re giggling in his lap for the rest of the night.

Or when the cameras catch you in a slightly compromising position, what appears to be Matty’s hand trailing up your skirt, his mouth attached to your neck, and your head thrown back. Even worse, you remember the night vividly. “Fuck, baby. So ready for me, should take you right here, huh?”

The embarrassment that floods your face when you see the photos in the morning barely diminishes when your boyfriend grins wolfishly. A sly comment about how they ‘got a free show.’ And how he would, ‘be taking pictures of you, too. Fuckin’ look at ya.’ You forget most of your embarrassment when he drags you to the bed, buries his head in your thighs and tells you that you can be loud as you want, he wants you to let go. How nobody else is watching, ‘unless you’re into that, babe.’

The edits, of course. They’re inevitable, with how often you two are on camera in your public lives. The first one you’d see if because Matty posts it on his story, a video of you, most likely, yelling at someone during a match. A stupid caption of something like ‘Me when?’ that causes you to giggle and reply to the story. The next time you see him, his for you page is practically just videos of you, or you and him. He loves it, funnily enough. You can’t lie and say you don’t.

Tabloids that come out about the both of you, phrases like ‘heavy petting’ and the ‘royalties of PDA’ that only make you both laugh. Attending an event with him, and when the camera pans to you both a silly graphic comes up that says ‘kiss cam’, and Matty practically smashes his face into yours. When introductions are being made by announcers, and as the camera skims past Matty in the crowd, one of them makes a comment on how they managed to ‘pry the two of you apart for your match.’

But you love every second of it.

[religion-is-a-mental-illness]

The horrific Fool Me Once-style nanny-cam footage that exposed an abusive wife: Secret camera footage shows battered husband threatened with a knife, beaten and cowering in a foetal position during wife's 20-year reign of terror

By: Stewart Carr and Kevin Donald

Published: Mar 15, 2024 

Sheree Spencer, 45, terrorised husband Richard at their East Yorks home

C5 documentary 'My Wife, My Abuser: The Secret Footage' airs Monday

Chilling never-before-seen footage from a nanny cam has revealed the moment a battered husband cowered on the floor while his wife hurled abuse at him and brandished a knife in their home during her 20-year reign of terror.

Damning videos of Sheree Spencer's attacks on husband Richard at their seven-bedroom home in Bubwith, East Yorkshire, were captured on cameras the couple had installed to monitor their children.

And explosive clips from police interviews show Sheree casually lying about her husband being the abuser, only for her face to turn ashen when confronted with the footage. 

On one occasion she defecated on the floor and forced him to clean it up, and on another she beat him with a wine bottle so hard it permanently disfigured his ear. 

Sheree, 45, was jailed for four years at Hull Crown Court in March 2023 by Judge Kate Rayfield, who told her: 'This is the worst case of controlling and coercive behaviour I have seen.'

Now, Mr Spencer is sharing his story in vivid detail in Channel 5 documentary My Wife, My Abuser: The Secret Footage, which airs on Monday.

And today, MailOnline can reveal Sheree went to desperate lengths through the courts in a bid to stop the documentary being broadcast. 

[ Damning clips of Sheree Spencer's attacks on husband Richard at their seven-bedroom home in Bubwith, East Yorkshire, were captured on cameras the couple installed to monitor their children ]

[ The hidden nanny cam gave a vital way out for battered husband Mr Spencer after he endured years of physical and verbal abuse from his wife, that sometimes left him 'broken' in a foetal position ]

[ Sheree's reign of domestic terror finally ended in June 2021 when the police were called to their family home by a concerned welfare worker ]

[ Footage showed furious wine-fuelled tirades, in which Sheree would call her husband 'fat boy,' 'a pussy' and 'dumb dumb' and inflict bruises and scratches ]

The footage, obtained from the nanny-cam, gives a chilling real-life echo of Harlan Coben's Netflix adaptation Fool Me Once, starring Michelle Keegan. In it, Keegan plays a woman who installs the small camera to keep watch over her young daughter, only to recognise an eerie figure from her past creeping into her home.

Mr Spencer felt his harrowing experiences should be seen to raise awareness of the type of abuse men can suffer in their daily lives at the hands of violent partners but Sheree tried to block it.

He told Mailonline: 'Sheree tried to stop the documentary being broadcast in the crown court but failed, then she applied for a prohibited steps order through the family court, which luckily was rejected and thrown out at the first hearing.

'The broadcast has been delayed due to the legal challenges for about six months, but now it is finally going to be shown.

'I'm hopeful that the film will be well received and will make a difference.'

The hidden nanny cam gave a vital way out for battered husband Mr Spencer after he endured years of physical and verbal abuse from his wife, that left him 'broken' on the floor in a foetal position.

Mr Spencer had met his wife in a nightclub in 2000, and the pair married on a Thai beach in 2009.

After they welcomed the eldest of their three daughters in 2015, Mr Spencer installed the nanny cam so they could keep watch over her.

Instead, footage showed furious wine-fuelled tirades, in which Sheree would call her husband 'fat boy,' 'a p**sy' and 'dumb dumb' and inflict bruises and scratches that he would need to cover with make-up before going outside. 

Mr Spencer told The Sun: 'We had two [cameras] — one in the playroom and one in the bedroom. They were there for reassurance, to keep an eye out because it's a big house.

'It was on something like a 28-day roll, where if something new came in it would delete the old footage.'

When police finally became involved, Mr Spencer handed over 43 images of his bruised face, taken on different dates following savage assaults he had suffered. 

[ Equally explosive clips from police interviews show Sheree casually lying about her husband being the abuser, only for her face to turn ashen when confronted with the clips ]

[ Mr Spencer, now happily settled with a new partner, decided to take part in the Channel 5 documentary to help other abused men speak out ]

[ Mr Spencer handed police 36 photographs he took of himself, showing cuts and bruises to his face and body ]

[ Sheree Spencer, 45, was jailed for four years for making her husband Richard's life a living hell with daily beatings and verbal attacks that left him cowering on the floor in the foetal position ]

[ Richard Spencer, pictured, secretly recorded video and audio of his wife's attacks on him for years. When police became involved he handed over 43 images of his bruised face and body ]

A police officer tells the documentary: 'This has been going on for such a long time, that this is who he is. Withdrawn and broken.'

Mr Spencer says: 'I just wanted the abuse to stop. I was in a situation and there was no way out.'

Hull Crown Court heard that mother-of-three Sheree had carried out most of the attacks on her husband in the family home.

Sheree worked at the highest levels for HM Prison and Probation Service and bragged to friends that she had the ear of former Prime Minister Boris Johnson.

She was a project manager in the department's directorate of strategy and performance.

A former friend said: 'She would brag about being only two down from the Prime Minister in her field and had meetings with Boris Johnson, who she spoke of as though he were a friend.

'She was bragging about her high flying career while subjecting her poor husband, a lovely man, to daily abuse, degradation and humiliation.'

It was described as 'a great irony' that Spencer had done so much work aimed at investigating the effect of custodial sentences on the family.

Within months of becoming a couple in 2000, Richard Spencer endured her violent rages, which happened whether she was drunk or sober.

The worst of the assaults on him happened in April 2021 when his wife attacked him with the empty wine bottle.

Mr Spencer, who stands at 5ft 10in, told the court that although he was bigger and physically stronger than his petite wife, he did not fight back when she began to attack him.

He said he became almost immune to the physical abuse she meted out, even though she would cause him immense pain by sinking her teeth into him.

But he said the mental scars left by 16 years of her hate-filled attacks were what would leave the most lasting effect.

Sheree's reign of domestic terror finally ended in June 2021 when the police were called to their family home by a concerned welfare worker.

Her arrest that day on suspicion of assaulting her husband opened a door into the hell he had kept private for his entire married life.  

Mr Spencer said: 'In trying to block the footage being shown, she continued trying to exert control even from jail, but fortunately justice prevailed.

'It’s astonishing to me that she’s living a relatively easy life in prison, having been moved to an open jail after six months of her sentence.

'The judge in her case described it as the worst case or coercive control she had ever seen, so why she was considered for open prison so early is beyond me.

'She is due for release next February but she is able to go out for family and friend meetings and has been working in a cafe.

'It doesn’t seem a just sentence for someone who committed such serious offences.'

Since his ex-wife's imprisonment, Mr Spencer has joined a campaign called ManKind Initiative, which supports male victims of domestic abuse.

He has also found love again and told media he is happily settled with his new partner. 

Speaking to media after Sheree was jailed last year, he said: 'I have become resigned to the fact that I will never fully recover from her abuse and that it will have a permanent damaging impact on mine and my family's life.

'Sheree's abuse towards me evolved and escalated over time, she used repeated acts of physical assault, threats, verbal abuse, and humiliation to punish and exercise control over me.

'The abuse was hidden from the outside world, including friends and family. Sheree manipulated me into believing that I was a responsible and willing participant in the abuse. She remorselessly proclaimed that I deserved to be punished, and that it was a justifiable consequence of me disappointing her in some way.

'Little by little, I lost my independence and willpower and just accepted that was how my life was going to be. I complied with Sheree's demands, and she controlled most aspects of my everyday life, including things like what activities I could participate in and when, which room I could sleep in, and even which toilet I could use.

'Gradually I became isolated from family and friends and was left deep in debt causing me to feel trapped.'

'After a while, I learnt to cover my face with my hands and curl up into a foetal position to try and avoid sustaining any visible facial injuries, so that I could still take the children to school and nursery.'

==

Abstract

Objectives. We sought to examine the prevalence of reciprocal (i.e., perpetrated by both partners) and nonreciprocal intimate partner violence and to determine whether reciprocity is related to violence frequency and injury.

Methods. We analyzed data on young US adults aged 18 to 28 years from the 2001 National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health, which contained information about partner violence and injury reported by 11 370 respondents on 18761 heterosexual relationships.

Results. Almost 24% of all relationships had some violence, and half (49.7%) of those were reciprocally violent. In nonreciprocally violent relationships, women were the perpetrators in more than 70% of the cases. Reciprocity was associated with more frequent violence among women (adjusted odds ratio [AOR]=2.3; 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.9, 2.8), but not men (AOR=1.26; 95% CI=0.9, 1.7). Regarding injury, men were more likely to inflict injury than were women (AOR=1.3; 95% CI=1.1, 1.5), and reciprocal intimate partner violence was associated with greater injury than was nonreciprocal intimate partner violence regardless of the gender of the perpetrator (AOR=4.4; 95% CI=3.6, 5.5).

Conclusions. The context of the violence (reciprocal vs nonreciprocal) is a strong predictor of reported injury. Prevention approaches that address the escalation of partner violence may be needed to address reciprocal violence.

Abstract

This annotated bibliography describes 343 scholarly investigations (270 empirical studies and 73 reviews) demonstrating that women are as physically aggressive as men (or more) in their relationships with their spouses or opposite-sex partners. The aggregate sample size in the reviewed studies exceeds 440,850 people.

Abstract and Figures

The first part of this article summarizes results from more than 200 studies that have found gender symmetry in perpetration and in risk factors and motives for physical violence in martial and dating relationships. It also summarizes research that has found that most partner violence is mutual and that self-defense explains only a small percentage of partner violence by either men or women. The second part of the article documents seven methods that have been used to deny, conceal, and distort the evidence on gender symmetry. The third part of the article suggests explanations for the denial of an overwhelming body of evidence by reputable scholars. The concluding section argues that ignoring the overwhelming evidence of gender symmetry has crippled prevention and treatment programs. It suggests ways in which prevention and treatment efforts might be improved by changing ideologically based programs to programs based on the evidence from the past 30 years of research