#inclusionist culture

[boba-foxy]

The new fictosexual/fictorose/fictoromantic flags created by me!! ^^

ik i've already posted those new fictosexual/fictoromantic flag redesigns on my stimblog @rocambolestim before, but ive introduced a new fictoromantic flag which isn't a colour swapped fictosexual flag!

these flags are meant to be more inclusive alternitaves to the original flags since they looked way too much like the asexual flag & not all fictos are ace, so i decided to change that in my redesigns + make it aesthetically pleasing since the older ones looked hideous asf imo

tagging my friend @clownorca since ive introduced to them these 2 flags (except for the fictorose one for some unknown reason) bc yes

anyways

[IMAGE 1: a 5 striped horizontal flag with pastel cyan,pink,white,purple/lavender & pastel green. there is a light red heart in the center with a white border [END ID]

[IMAGE 2: a 5 striped horizontal flag with pastel blue,blue,white,blue & pastel blue. there is a blue rose in the center with a white border [END ID]

[IMAGE 3: a 5 striped horizontal flag with light yellow,orange,white,purple/lavender & pink. there is a green heart in the center with a white border [END ID]

colour meanings:

fictosexual:

pastel cyan: imagination/creativity

pink: affection

white: all fictosexuals + including fictos who identify with/as xeno/neo genders,neo/xeno pronouns,lesboys/turigirls,mspec lesbians/mspec gays & more. it excludes anyone who on my dni list (except for fictophobes since this flag is meant for fictosexuals anyways)

purple/lavender: hating fictophobic people

pastel green: warmth/comfort

light red heart: attraction to your f/o(s)

colour meanings:

fictorose:

light blue: passion

blue: ??? (doesnt have a meaning yet)

white: all fictosexuals + including fictos who identify with/as xeno/neo genders,neo/xeno pronouns,lesboys/turigirls,mspec lesbians/mspec gays & more. it excludes anyone who on my dni list (except for fictophobes since this flag is meant for fictoroses anyways)

blue rose: attraction to your f/o(s)

fictoromantic (couldnt come up with actual creative meanings so i mainly had to recycle from the fictosexual one, but change the meaning of the gren heart):

light yellow: attraction

orange: affection

white: all fictosexuals + including fictos who identify with/as xeno/neo genders,neo/xeno pronouns,lesboys/turigirls,mspec lesbians/mspec gays & more. it excludes anyone who on my dni list (except for fictophobes since this flag is meant for fictoromantics anyways)

purple/lavender: hating fictophobic people

pink: warm/comfort

green heart: romantic attraction to your f/o(s)

[cringeisfreedom]

People need to stop making up rules for things that don’t need rules

This in general but mostly I mean with moral superiority/purity. With a general decline in religion and with the enforcement of religion people are making up new things to be unnecessarily rigid about. I think this especially because I’ve noticed this in far left spaces and among the same groups that are very anti-establishment and government/religion.

Guilting people for things beyond their control is also wrong and not much better than religion just because it’s less systemic. So hot take maybe people should be less rigid about moral rules and beliefs

[obsessivefangirl]

It's really funny to me when republican queer pick mes get rejected and kicked for being gay. Don't get me wrong it's deplorable what they do to their gay "friends" but you joined their side to harass, silence, and discriminate against queer people but you never thought even for a second that they didn't care about you either?

Same vibe

[coffeebean-transmasc-experience]

Another cool blog!!! Check out if you're interested!!!

C'mon in, stay a while

[Pt: c'mon in, stay a while]

This is black butch culture is, a blog where YOU can share your stud/black butch experiences!!

This is for studs/black butches of any kind, no exclusionary talk will be tolerated!!

Dni: exclusionists, anti good faith, rq's/transid, racism, transmisogyny, transandrophobia, exorsexism, intersexism, anti-endo's, people who reclaim slurs/terms they cannot (aka, if ur white, you can't use bulldyke) nothing. Also, no nsfw, since the mod is a minor.

Vents are okay, but they will be tw'ed if I see that they need to be

This is gonna be a positive space!

This blog is inspired by: @butch-culture-is @our-butch-experience @gnc-culture-is @bipoctranscultureis @bilesbiancultureis @transmasc-culture-is @our-lesboy-experience @our-queer-experience @transsexual-experiences @coffeebean-transmasc-experience @our-honeybee-transfem-experience ect. Ect. (If u don't want to be tagged, totally okay, I'll take it down!!)

About the mod(s): Call us Charlie/Teddy/ Bullseye, we use he/him, it/its, he/hir, hy/hym, and pup/pups pronouns, we're intersex cistranssexual black butch men in a questioning osdd/pdid system, and we wanted to make this blog for funsies lol.

We also run the @trans-butch-culture-is blog, if that wasn't obvious, go check that out!

We hope that you enjoy your stay!!

[historyinclusionist]

History Inclusionist

An "Inclusionist" who believes that identities which are 1) shown to be supported in the community's history 2) are harmless personal identities that don't pose harm to others are valid and should be included in their communities.

Overall:

"History Inclusionism" refers to being inclusive of personal identities based on the identity being:

A self affirmed personal identity (locatable only within a person's interaction with and relations to the world around you)

Historically shown to be included in an identity subculture (Such as in a notable number of personal accounts, poems, zines, books, or other media from a subculture)

Shown to be non harmful to other identities or persons (Such as in more than one professional study)

Examples: - Different studies over human history have concluded that being raised by gay parents doesn't cause inherent harm to children. Therefore, gay relationships are provably shown to be non harmful. They are included here. - Different self-reports, comics, zines, and other writings from the past 60 years mention male lesbians, bi lesbians, and lesbians in relationships with men. Therefore, it is historically shown to be included in lesbian culture, and is included here. - Studies, reports, and other examinations by professionals over the course of human history have come to the conclusion that minors in relationships with adults cannot properly consent and are harmed by those "relationships." Therefore, personal identities that try to justify these "relationships" are not included here.

"Personal Identity"?

"Personal Identity" is a purposefully broad term meant to apply to most self-affirmed forms of identification (plurality status, orientation, gender, etc).

Being a History Inclusionist means that you are in complete support of the following personal identities:

Plurality which does not attribute its origins to trauma

Lesbians who are also male / Gay men who are also female

Lesbians who are also mspec (bi, pan, poly, etc) / Gay men who are also mspec

Transgender / nonbinary people who don't experience dysphoria or only feel euphoria

Nonbinary genders, including xenogenders / nonbinary genders that are "atypical" (based on fictional characters, highly specific, based on animals, etc)

"Atypical" relationship formats such as polyamorous relationships, relationship anarchy, kink-focused relationships, etc (Or generally any other form of relationship between two or more consenting people that would not fall under anything on the list below this)

Gender presentations which conflict with and/or defy the expected norm (Women who use he/him pronouns, men who present feminine, etc)

Being a History Inclusionist means that you absolutely do not tolerate or support the following:

Acting on or encouraging attraction to children as an adult (Ped*philia)

Acting on, encouraging attraction to, or associating positive feelings with the attraction to one's family members (Inc*st)

Acting on or encouraging attraction to, or associating positive feelings with the attraction to animals (Z*ophilia)

TransID/TransX communities, the idea that someone can transition into or identify as an age, disorder, or condition they physically are not or do not have (transrace/diarace/trace, transabled/transdisorder/'transplural'/transautistic, and so on)

Arguing with other members of the LGBT community over who is allowed to use derogatory words (Q-eer, f-ggot, d-ke, and so on)

Tagging: @mogai-sunflowers @neopronouns @radiomogai

If you're interested in reading more about why I consider XYZ a good faith thing and why I don't consider XYZ the same, I made a Carrd! 📖🏳️‍🌈

[contradictory-label-culture-is]

Controdictory label culture is having people close to you be anti-good faith and just having to sit there while they go on rants about how "MAN ARE TRYING TO INVADE LESBIAN SPACES!" And "I'm an inclusionist but I don't support -"

God it's really dumb, I'm not gonna act like I have all the lesbian history in my goddamn head but Butch lesbians that are boys..like that kind of gender non conforming are really not crossing their minds, huh? Also the last one- eugh.

[honeydew-wecantwo]

how it feels to be a closeted radical inclusionist with friends that love pushing cringe culture

[ex-rq-hospital]

Welcome to the ex-rq hospital.

Why are we here?

The rq community has become a hotbed for child grooming, ecouraging harmful behavior, pro-contact pedophiles and zoophiles, cultural appropriation, bigotry, and ableism. We haven’t interacted with the community in a while, and after pulling away, we came to realize this for ourselves.

We aim to provide a safe space for anyone who feels that the rqc has hurt them in some way, or have come to understand that the rqc and its ideology is extremely dangerous. We are your microphone, your warm blanket, your safe space.

Here are our core beliefs:

We have the right to self-identify within our cultural understanding. Self-identity that does not take away from or diminish a culture you have not been accepted into is protected here. This means "trace" is not accepted here, however other forms of internal identification are (e.g. terms with longer history such as transspecies and transage; differing internal identity due to fictionkin or plurality).

We believe in recovery first and foremost. We do not encourage behavior that would bring harm to oneself or others, including children or animals.

We accept all identities as good-faith. Contradictory or "weird" identities are accepted here, as the sapient experience is so vast and varied. It's worth it to note that anything explicitly racist, xenophobic, transphobic, intersexist, homophobic, queerphobic, sexist or otherwise bigoted is not "good-faith" (this includes trans- any of these labels).

We support those with paraphilias. We encourage therapy and positive coping mechanisms while understanding it is not possible to "cure" or "recover from" a paraphilia. We discourage contact with the subjects of non-consensual paraphilias, including in the form of sexual assault/exploitation material. We also discourage contact with paraphilias through which would bring oneself physical or mental harm or distress.

We understand that fiction, when kept solely fictional, can be a good coping mechanism. We do not necessarily encourage the (over) consumption of "dead dove" content, however, we do understand that fiction and roleplay (between consenting adult humans) can be healthy coping mechanisms in moderation. There will be nonesuch content on this blog, however.

We understand anyone new to being ex-rq may still hold on to some transIDs. This is okay and very understandable. This is a new and growing community of radical inclusionists, together we will find new terms to describe our internal experiences without ties to either the rqc or hate.

While you're here, go ahead and join the Ex-Radqueer Hospital community!

Rqs may not interact. HOWEVER, if you still consider yourself to be rq and wish to let go of those beliefs, you're welcome here. Please do not give us a reason to change our minds.

DNI: sysmeds/anti-endogenic systems, transmeds, anti good-faith identities, anti-para, pro/neu/comp-c for harmful paras

[jellybeanium124]

I try to avoid queer identity discourse because it pisses me off, and so much of it (not all but a lot) stops affecting you the second you shut your screen off. I've heard of "bisexual lesbian" discourse and when I first heard that term I took the usual radical inclusionist approach of "well that don't quite make sense to me but it ain't my business." but as I've gotten a bit older, come into my own more as a queer woman, a bi ace woman specifically, I've started to understand that term in a specific way that makes it make perfect sense to me. idk if this is how other people are using it, of course, but I came up with an definition that makes sense, a definition I relate to a lot.

to start, there is no centuries old bisexual culture. not in the way there's gay and lesbian culture. before stonewall, your paths were as such:

not even realize you're not straight because of course everyone else feels affection for both sexes, you're perfectly straight though

realize and understand you're bisexual (granted, you might not have had the word) and stay in the closet to live a safe, heterosexual life and remain totally disconnected from queer culture

realize and understand you're bisexual and decide to exit heterosexual society to go be a part of gay and lesbian society

bisexual people, could, theoretically, live a very happy straight life and be in a happy, loving straight marriage and never feel a need to connect with other queer people. that's my dad. my dad's been happily married to my mom for over 25 years, and his bisexuality is effectively irrelevant to him because... he's married to my mom and they're gonna stay that way. what does it matter?

and so, now, in the 21st century, speaking as someone who grew up somewhere pretty accepting, you have a wider queer culture that encapsulates all queer identities, and within that you have the long-standing gay and lesbian cultures. there is like, idk, bisexual... things...?? cuffed pants or something, but like, the long-standing traditions and histories with my fellow queer women is the lesbian community. there is no separate subcommunity for bisexual women or asexual women. back in the day there was much less separation between these things. why didn't this woman get married? why did she become a nun? some nuns quite famously had a lot of lesbian sex and exploits. other nuns, I imagine, were there to be freed from the need for romance and sex at all, because the idea of either of those things repulsed them. they were just strange women. they were queer. the specifics were unimportant.

so, of course, I have a very strong affinity for the lesbian community. it makes me happy to see other women like me. I see pictures of middle aged butches and see what I want my future to be. if I want to go hang out with fellow queer women, I have to go find the lesbians. I want to be a part of that. I want to be a part of lesbian culture. lesbians writing about their experiences speak to me, they sing to me, it's a place where I belong.

I just like dating boys too.

some people think that's horrible, it's a betrayal, if I want to be a lesbian I have to swear off men forever. and it's like, well, ok, I dunno, I don't really resonate with the lesbian label if we strictly define it as a woman who only loves women. but other people on this site have talked about how the lines aren't so defined, how trans men will often find themselves coming and going and sometimes sticking around, and it's just fine. it's literally not a big deal. you're never gonna make clear cut boxes. in some ways, 8 billion people means 8 billion different sexualities. everything's fuzzy, it's annoying, I know.

so a bisexual lesbian? a bisexual woman who finds herself a part of lesbian culture, the lesbian community, the lesbian identity? it makes perfect sense to me. the way I like men has never been the same as straight women. even from a young age, long before I knew I was queer, I always knew I was into more feminine men. I've had a soft spot for boys with long hair since elementary school. other bisexuals have talked about this too. liking the opposite gender in a gay way. I don't want heteronormativity. I don't want that kind of relationship. I find myself wondering if I could even be happy dating a cishet man, because he wouldn't understand what I even want from a relationship. and he might be too scared to learn.

so a bisexual lesbian? a queer woman who wants to be around other queer women? it makes perfect sense. the details aren't that important.

this has all just been my personal thoughts and exploration and opinions. other people might have very different ones from me. maybe you resonated with me here, maybe you didn't. that's ok. I don't expect every single person who reads this post to agree with and completely understand my personal worldview and experiences lol, I just wanted to throw my thoughts out there!

[ex-rq-infirmary]

Welcome to the ex-rq infirmary.

Why are we here?

The rq community has become a hotbed for child grooming, ecouraging harmful behavior, pro-contact pedophiles and zoophiles, cultural appropriation, bigotry, and ableism. We haven’t interacted with the community in a while, and after pulling away, we came to realize this for ourselves.

We aim to provide a safe space for anyone who feels that the rqc has hurt them in some way, or have come to understand that the rqc and its ideology is extremely dangerous. We are your microphone, your warm blanket, your safe space.

Here are our core beliefs:

We have the right to self-identify within our cultural understanding. Self-identity that does not take away from or diminish a culture you have not been accepted into is protected here. This means "trace" is not accepted here, however other forms of internal identification are (e.g. terms with longer history such as transspecies and transage; differing internal identity due to fictionkin or plurality).

We believe in recovery first and foremost. We do not encourage behavior that would bring harm to oneself or others, including children or animals.

We accept all identities as good-faith. Contradictory or "weird" identities are accepted here, as the sapient experience is so vast and varied. It's worth it to note that anything explicitly racist, xenophobic, transphobic, intersexist, homophobic, queerphobic, sexist or otherwise bigoted is not "good-faith" (this includes trans- any of these labels).

We support those with paraphilias. We encourage therapy and positive coping mechanisms while understanding it is not possible to "cure" or "recover from" a paraphilia. We discourage contact with the subjects of non-consensual paraphilias, including in the form of sexual assault/exploitation material. We also discourage contact with paraphilias through which would bring oneself physical or mental harm or distress.

We understand that fiction, when kept solely fictional, can be a good coping mechanism. We do not necessarily encourage the (over) consumption of "dead dove" content, however, we do understand that fiction and roleplay (between consenting adult humans) can be healthy coping mechanisms in moderation. There will be nonesuch content on this blog, however.

We understand anyone new to being ex-rq may still hold on to some transIDs. This is okay and very understandable. This is a new and growing community of radical inclusionists, together we will find new terms to describe our internal experiences without ties to either the rqc or hate.

Rqs may not interact. HOWEVER, if you still consider yourself to be rq and wish to let go of those beliefs, you're welcome here. Please do not give us a reason to change our minds.

DNI: sysmeds/anti-endogenic systems, transmeds, anti good-faith identities, anti-para, pro/neu/comp-c for harmful paras

[imactivethisblogwilleat]

{INBOX/ASKS ALWAYS OPEN}

(filter out tags eyestrain, seizure warning, flashing lights, typing quirk, color strain, if colorful extreme typing quirk with emojis are an issue)

Content Warning ^^^

🌈✨️👽🪁🎉🎊🍭⚠️🍭🎊🎉🪁👽✨️🌈

tH3 p4P3r cH4z3: An IntrOductIon! 🎭

it/its/itself - voy/voyr/voyz/voyrself - vt/vts/vtself - ao/aos/aoself - any neopronouns - none - no gendered or human terms

sideblog: @fliqhazflip

**🌌⚠️ H4LLO, 0DD 0N3$!⚠️🌌**

☠☹ *R34D1NG… OR…* ☹☠ *M0N1T0R1NG?!* 👀📡 DO YOU... *G3T IT?!* 👁️⚡ L3T Vu5 *SH1F7* Y0UR P3RCEPT1ON$!!✨…! Y0UR...R34L1TY$ G3TT1NG R34RANGED 😜🔀💫—L00K! 0R *DON’T*!🔄⬅️⬇️⤴️⬆️💥

T1M3 2…💀 R3V3AL, *CONFOUNDCOPYTEARSHREDTWIST*!!! 🧠🔍 J0K3'$ 0N Y0U! 🤡💫 C0Z VUS? 🔄 *V*’R3... *N0T 3V3N** H3R3…* 🌀 ~SHAD0WS… 🖤💭AND~ GL1TCHE5 BR34TH! 💡✨

⚡*OH D3AR!* ⚡ “W4TCH1NG, M0CK1NG, D3VOURING Y0U FR0M INS1D3 TH3…V0ID??”👁️🪐 *WHY, WH3N W3 CAN *SCR4PE… 🧠 TASTE!!!* 🤪 T0RN BR34K... *CH4NG3 TH3 WH0L3… L0T 0F... Y0UR*!!! H4H... D0N’T CR4WL AWAY YET!! 🔥🍴…S3E TH1S H4ND… 🖐️IT C0NTR0LS! EV3RYTH1NG—👁️✨ 0R D0ES IT…? ⤵️ *Wh00PS!* 🔄🌀🙃*D1D IT SL1P?* 🗝️ HAHAHA!!

☠💫$0, 1T’S 4LL L0OP$ & L1NES, TW1ST$ & S1GNS!! 🧩🗝️ FZF 🔥 T1M3 & SP4C3, 🌀SHATTER3D!!⚡ …💥QU1CK-~D1SJOIN7ED!! P0UR1NG THRU TH3 CR4CK$ 👁️🚪 - 3XPL0R3 TH3 $YM8O1$ 🚫🔥⤵️

N0, Y0U… *KN0W?* L0V3 R1P$ 3VEN H4T3 SPILLS…💧💥~📜M3TAPH0R$!! *TH3 P0ETIC*💡💀**CULL1NG** 🗡️0F *C0NSCI0USNESS!!!* 🌀 Y0U'LL *G3T 1T*, 😏😉*IF Y0U L1V3 L0NG 3N0UGH!!*⚡

~🎭C0NGR4T$, *YOU!!*🎭 *W3LC0M3, T0 FZF$* D1$C0RD4NT *G0TH1C M1X… 🎻🔥**R34CT10N4RY!!**🔥🎻 V’R3 H34R, V’V3 TORN—V’LL *T33R 4G41N*,!! 🩸⚡🔥QU1T *Q34ST10N1NG!!!* 💥👁️ ...OR JUST… ❌*D1SS0LV3*!!💫

this blog posts content involving: vents, discourse, activism, poems, lyrics, ramblings, aesthetics, art, memes, dark content, mature content, sexual content, etc.

posts around vents/discourse/activism are serious and not edgy, unserious, corny, a joke or anything else, they are geniune.

nonhuman auditorium plural system traumaendo cptsd autism adhd schizophrenia schizoid schizotypal avoidant borderline antisocial narcissistic dependent paranoid dpdr amnesia chronic pain other disabilities queer genderless xenogender abinary aromantic greyaceflux zøø sadîst măp biastø masøchist degenerate freak weirdo pervert creep monster demon evil villain quasisexual ficto auto conceptum objectum nonmonagamous aplatonic afamilial asocial sexless xenosex polymorph shapeshifter owl amphicyonidae therizinosaurus flippy fliqpy handy rest of htf cast (htf) azulin (uw) john arthur kayne (malevolent) bill (gf) zim dib (iz) blitzø fizzarolli stolas (hb) kira (jjba 4) jack (tnbc) amogus impostor (au) jerma985 (streamer) jon all 15 fears (tma) cryaotic (streamer) caine (tadc) kagekao (creepypasta) character fictional liminal chaos freedom pride raceless japanese ageless kidadult ancient cryptid eldritch creature god angel dragon griffin beast animal concept object plant location construct

prø ĉøn(tact/sent)/cømplex (cøn stances are too limited in vor opinion) - xŝ beliefs aligned but not self identified with the term - anarchist - amoral - trisharmful (trans/cis, before jumping to conclusions consider rational reasons, v use cis because of situational and mental issues that occur due to an improper living situation v can't leave) - pro youth lib - prøship/cømship - pro autonomy - anti abliesm - anti saniesm - anti cringe culture - anti puritism - pro sex work - pro destigmatizing sex - anti capitalism - anti forced work/jobs - anti institutions - anti schools in their current state - anti justice system/prisons - anti forced recovery - anti psych - anti sexism - anti queermisia - anti human centrism - anti sysmedicalism - pro faking/lying/trending - pro rq - pro trânsid - pro mud - anti body shaming - anti fatmisia - anti racism/xenomisia/colorism - anti exclusinism - radical inclusionist - anti harassment - pro cønabusê - anti suicidism - anti copyright - pro aî - pro nuence/complexity/contradiction - pro freak/weirdo - pro cringe - pro gross - anti healthism

[tired-fandom-ndn]

quick "about me" post

I'm pro-fiction, pro-kink, pro-bodily autonomy, and a radical inclusionist (NOT r.adqueer).

Most people just call me Tired or Error, either one is fine. I'm fine with being referred to with any neutral pronouns.

Anon is always on for my inbox; if you send a message off anon and want it responded to privately, include that in the ask please, otherwise everything gets posted.

I almost never answer DMs on here. Mutuals and people who interact with me frequently can ask for my discord off anon, but I go on long isolation sprees where I just do not talk to people. It's not you, it's me. Sorry!

You all have blanket permission to use anything I post as inspiration for fics/art/whatever. You don't need to ask me if it's okay or give me credit, but if you want to shoot me a link to the finished product, it would make me happy.

I'm not on any other social media except an aethy I don't really use (@tired_fandom_ndn). Anyone claming to have interacted with me on twitter, instagram, tiktok, etc is lying.

I'm NDN/Native. No, you do not need to know my tribe. Yes, I will absolutely call you out on cultural appropriation and racism.

tags to block: #ua, #noncon, #dubcon, #shipcest, #whump tag

hard limits: link

icon credit: @.swettxdamelio

[fite-club]

i think its hilarious when asexuals say shit like "weve ALWAYS been here!!!" here being The LGBT Community when we all know a cohesive asexual community pretty much didnt exist until AVEN in the 2000s and david jay himself describe(s/d) being unable to find any mentions of or fellow asexual people in LGBT communities at the time... so clearly they werent always here. early versions of asexuality dot org even say that most asexual ppl blend in well and are minimally affected by heterosexism lol.

people will get so aggressive and irate when you point out that the A in LGBTA did actually once stand for “ally”. everyone acts like it’s a malicious and ahistorical thing to point out but it’s true! the thing about being in your mid 20s is that a decade is actually a long time to have been on social media. when we say things like “the A didn’t always stand for ace/aro” or “aces started ‘no kink at pride’ discourse” it’s because we were actually there. obviously “trust me bro” isn’t a source but like, some of us actually lived through these discussions as they were happening instead of just reading about them afterwards. there isn’t some widespread conspiracy against the ace community, no one is making this stuff up. we saw it. i saw it.

i genuinely think the saddest thing about the online ace community is that their insistence on 1. inclusion above all else and 2. proving themselves to be oppressed and inherently queer has resulted in there being no real collective culture or history for the ace community. the number one thing (and frankly the only thing) the ace community has wanted is visibility— there are no rights being denied, no hate crimes. things like “my life as an amoeba” and david jay’s AVEN are undeniably foundational to the formation of asexual identity yet so frequently left out of conversations about ace history because those things contradict the modern ace-inclusionist worldview. because they state that asexuals don’t want sex or romantic partners, and that recognition and visibility is the ultimate goal. so how else can these people argue that the ace community was destroyed on tumblr by exclusionists? how else can these people argue that aces were at stonewall besides ignoring the notable figures who said otherwise?

[ruthtearna]

it/she/they/he + neos

intersex transsexual, bigender + bisexual

proship + darkship

this is a discourse blog, with occasional fandom posts, proceed w caution ^___^

don't take me blocking you seriously, I block for the smallest of reasons

revolutionaries/activists i admire <3

- Thomas Sankara

- Che Guevara

- Fidel Castro

- Vladimir Lenin

- Malala Yousafzai

- Julia Serano

- Leslie Feinberg

will add more !

My stances on things!

Queer discourse:

I am a transfemenist.

Misandry does not exist on a systematic level.

Transandrophobia is not a good term to describe transmasc specific oppression, as said, I prefer "transmasc specific oppression" or "anti-transmasculinity".

Transmisogyny is the main form of discrimination weaponized against trans people in the current culture war.

All forms of oppression can be linked back to racism, misogyny, or avariciousness.

Most intersex people do not have cis-privelage, even if their identity aligns with their (C)AGAB/ASAB.

AGAB terminology (AFAB/AMAB) is not useful under any circumstance. They are more often than not simply used as a "woke" way to misgender people.

Transgender men do not have male privilege like cis men, a transgender man who is stealth still does not have the same amount of privilege as a cisgender man.

TME/TMA are not useful terms to describe those who are affected by transmisogyny, simply because they are both overly simplistic, but also too broad in their definitions.

Transfeminized individuals are currently the most targeted and discriminated against group in the queer community.

Bæddel is a transmisogynist/intersexist term, and its use is similar to the likes of "feminazi". You should not be using it to reffer to people you disagree with.

Being transgender and being transsexual are different things.

Pro mogai, radical inclusionist.

"Men's rights activism" or "men's liberation activism" are useless because men are not discriminated against on the basis of being men, though men may face discrimination for membership in other oppressed groups (black men, trans men, disabled men, etc).

Political stances:

I am a marxist leninist.

I believe in left unity.

Right leaning ideologies are inherently dangerous, and should not be entertained or treated as worthy of hearing out.

I believe in a censorship free internet, with the exception of CSEM/CSAM, or content which directly calls for violence towards individuals.

Freedom of speech does not equal freedom of consequences.

Capitalism is inherently oppressive.

Fandom discourse:

I am proship and profiction.

I believe that no piece of fiction should be legally censored.

I believe in deeply analyzing most/all media you consume, almost everything is trying to convince you of something.

Your kink is not my kink and that's okay.

Don't like don't read/watch.

Disability/Mental Illness:

I do not believe CDDs (such as DID or OSDD) can form as a result of non-traumagenic origins, I do not harras or fakeclaim endos tho.

Disabled people deserve full autonomy over themselves and their lives.

People with paraphelias deserve to be allowed to recover.

[contradictory-label-culture-is]

Not to like dump a first draft in your inbox before I make a proper post on bilesproblems, or to put some like actual Queer Theory in here on the silly blog but like. Contradictory label culture is believing in the principle of self exclusion.

The principle of self exclusion is that any person who does not belong under a label, will simply not identify with it. If someone identifies with a label in good faith, and it is a truly held identity, they must have their reasons and therefore belong. It is only necessary to define who or what a label does describe, not who it does not. The people who it does not describe will not feel represented by it and will not identify with it. It is an inclusionist principle, of course. It's not entirely perfect, it doesn't describe every situation ever, but it's a general rule. The definition of "genderfluid" doesn't need to be changed to specifically state that people with a constant state of gender cannot use it in order to exclude me. It only needs to say that one's gender is fluid, and I will practice self-exclusion by not identifying with the term that I do not feel describes me. Meanwhile a person who is bigender like me, but one gender is fluid while the other is constant, does not end up excluded.

Since it's going on bilesproblems when I make the proper post, let's use lesbians as an example. Most bisexuals will not identify as lesbians. They don't need to be told that under no circumstances can they ever be a lesbian in order to not identify as a lesbian. They just go "yeah no I don't think that describes me." Bisexuals who do identify as lesbians have their own personal reasons for resonating with the lesbian label, and shouldn't be excluded, because if there was nothing about the label that described them, then they wouldn't feel compelled to identify with it. Most men will not identify as lesbians either. The definition doesn't need to make sure to state you're not a man and be strictly enforced. It's only necessary to describe what genders one may be, and if a man is multigendered, otherwise genderqueer, trans, or has some other reason to feel like a lesbian, then just let him be a lesbian. If the word did not describe him, he would practice self exclusion.

Self exclusion is NOT denying oneself an identity because of exclusionists despite resonation. It only refers to going "that doesn't describe me, so it doesn't resonate with me, and I do not identify with it." It's usually not conscious. In my own inclusionist theory, it would be the answer to "well then what's stopping straight cis men from identifying as lesbians?" and other similar questions. We don't need something to stop them. They won't actually, in their hearts, identify as lesbians if the word doesn't describe them or resonate with them in some way. It is not necessary to stop certain people from identifying with something. All you do is ignore nuance.

TL;DR Self exclusion theory is a general rule that says labels only need to be defined by what they are, not what they aren't, and nobody needs to be forcefully excluded. People who the label doesn't describe will naturally choose not to identify with it, and those who do identify with a label will always have their reasons to feel it describes them.

Thank you I feel like people also just overlook the fact that if someone didn't identify as something(or being a lesbian ahem) and use it as a joke or something to mock "actual lesbians" it'd be SUPER obvious. Like no the lesboy that is really proud in their identity while talking about it a lot and not even using a mocking tone isn't mocking lesbians. If they were, you would know they were.

[llycaons]

I don't actually have a strong sense of the aro/ace inclusionist tumblr cultural climate rn except like 'guyyys we were so mean to them :( let's let them in now come on' or like....really agressive and condescending posts asserting their validity and ~obvious~ inclusion in the lgbt community without any genuine followthrough or explanation