#anti c

[inuette]

Official (Anti) RQ Archive

[PT: Official (Anti) Radqueer Archive. END PT. ]

　Last Updated (DD/MM/YY): 08/01/24. This archive will be updated over time, so make sure to check back regularly if you can! If you have anxiety regarding opening links, no worries! All these posts are archived under our "archived" & resources tags.

Anti-RQ Terms/Flags

'PRAT' meaning

'Fluffy Para'

'Arissomei'/'Arissodic'

'Atypical Dysphoria Awareness' (Creator Boundary)

Reclaimed Transage, Transracial (Adoptee), Transspecies and Transabled Flags

Reclaimed Transabled Flag 2 + Symbol

BIID Flag + Symbol

Parahealth

RQ Terms/Flags

'Faux Cult'/'Fult' and Flags

Xenoanarchism

Other Terms

Doc

PSAs

Radparas

'Kandiqueer'

'Xenosatanism' and Xenosatanist Flags

'@//sophieinwonderland'

The Angel's Web "Fult"

'Not All Radqueers'

Initial 'Fult' PSA

"The Ezra Files" (Content/Trigger Warning: (Pro-C) Pedophilia, Incest, Bestiality, Zoosadism, Toddler/Baby Abuse, Grooming, CSEM Trading, Rape, Abduction, Admissions Of CSA, Admissions Of Incest, Admissions Of Bestiality…)

TransN*zi Symbols

Other Resources

What IS A Radqueer? Why Are They Bad?

RQ Original Coining Info

RQs are a Cult

RQs and Stochastic Terrorism

The Insult of 'Cisdisabled'

BIID and RQ Grooming

RQ '2024 Calendar'

Talk of Atypical Dysphoria

WHY Misuse of Transrace and the term 'Trace' are Bad

Talk of "Transautism"/being "Transautistic"

You Cannot 'Coin' A Medical Disorder/Talk of "MUDs"

Intrusive Thoughts About =/= Actually Believing in Them

'I have intrusive thoughts about ...' isn't a 'Valid' Excuse

Transitioning When It Comes To TransIDs and TransX Identities

Transethnic People Aren't Valid (Focuses on East Asians & Koreans)

There Are Better Ways to Cope with Atypical Dysphoria

Why Arissomei/Arissodic is its Own Term

Racial Hierarchy and Being "Trace"/"Transracial"

Blackface is Blackface — Your "Intent" Doesn't Matter

Alternative (Non-TERF Rhetoric) Anti-Radqueer Arguments

Suibaiting Radqueers ISN'T Okay

If You're Thinking of Leaving the RQ Community

'Cracker' is Not a Slur

Suibaiting RQs isn't Welcome Here

Radinclus does NOT Mean Radqueer

Misusage of Languages in RQ Spaces

How-To's

Reporting a RQ for Inciting Violence

(Fighting Against) RQs Rebranding Terms as 'RQ Terms'

Coping with Atypical Dysphoria

Getting Out and Staying Out Of the Community

General Tips

Reaffirmation

Reaffirmation of Why RQs are Bad (TWs included in the post)

BIID (Body Integrity Identity Disorder) =/= Radqueer (Affirmation)

[way2manyusernamez]

[cw: pro-contacts, me getting angry about pro-contacts]

hmm.. maybe the radqueer community isn't so bad... i'll look at the tag today ^u^

oh wow, he coined transID? so cool! i wonder what else he has on his blog-

oh. that's him reblogging a post that's extremely clearly about being pro-c.

and running a ""safe"" discord server. that definitely includes pro-cs.

but surely that "hebequeer" post isn't popular? surely someone is calling this out?

surely there's at least SOMEONE in the notes saying this is bad?

nope. literally only positive feedback. fuck this stupid community.

fuck this community for letting these people in, fuck this community for telling people to be "more inclusive" to people with an ideology justifying abuse, fuck this community for convincing people that unethical relationships are ethical, fuck this community for creating these unsafe "safe" spaces, fuck this community for letting these people hide, fuck this community for letting these people be open about their abusive ideology. a community i once was proud of, now nothing but a hell pit of edgelords justifying animal abuse and justifying child abuse. fuck pro contact bullshit

[sage-thee-herbmaster]

Proof that minors are being groomed by PRATS.

This user thinks that the age of consent should be abolished, and that children of any age should be allowed to be in sexual relationships with adults and thinks you can’t be youth lib if you disagree with this. Everyone with a brain knows that, yes, pubescent minors can consent, TO EACH OTHER.

There’s nothing wrong with teenagers having sex, but it’s not healthy for them mentally, to engage in sexual relationship with grown ass adults even if it’s “consensual” as the consent that teenagers give to adults is usually the result of prior grooming (I should know because that happened with me) and there’s countless reliable studies and victim word of mouth recounts proving this.

Children can’t consent to adults, simple as that and hope that “AAM” radqueers realise this and get help.

This account also thinks that “cracker” is just as bad as a slur for white people as the n-word is for black people even though cracker doesn’t have the horrible history behind it like the n-word does, so yeah there’s that…

Conclusion: Radqueers are groomers, pass it on.

[rottenrancid]

i can’t believe this has to be said but;

you are not an anti contact 🗺️ if you seek out/look at real cp/csam. you are not an anti contact 🗺️ if you take advantage of underage “sellers” on parablr. you are not an anti contact 🗺️ if you engage sexually with radqueers on here who identify as an older age if their chronological and bioloogical age is under 18.

IF YOU KNOWINGLY AND SEXUALLY ENGAGE WITH A CHILD IN ANY WAY (NOT JUST PHYSICALLY) YOU ARE NOT AN ANTI-CONTACT 🗺️. DO NOT CALL YOURSELF ONE.

[linkydays]

hello! my name is Link - I'm a Breath of the Wild fictive in a traumagenic system. i use he/him and they/them pronouns interchangeably.

i am very connected with my source and source memories, but i am learning to recognize the difference between them and my reality. i am personally an advocate for source separation, but i am just a guy on tumblr. whether you choose to source separate or not is totally your call.

this is a sideblog mostly just for me to reblog posts related to my source/systemhood and for me to explore/solidify my own identity.

no DNI but i block freely.

discourse stance information + blog credits under the cut

these are my opinions on different discourse subjects for anyone who wants to know them. you are ultimately responsible for your own interaction, so this is meant to allow you to make your own call on whether i am someone you want to interact with or not.

i support/am "pro-"

all lgbtq+ identities, including neopronouns, xenogenders, microlabels, mspec gays/lesbians, lesboys, etc etc.

self-diagnosis

all fictional content, as well as people's right to create and consume whatever fictional content they want for whatever reason (and also blocking people whose fictional content you don't personally like rather than harassing them for it)

otherkin, fictionkin, alterhumanity, and therianthropy

endogenic plurality, though i am against the use of the term "tulpamancy" ("thoughtform"/"willogenic" are better alternatives)

paraphilia and the support of people with paraphilic disorders

i don't support/am "anti-"

queer exclusionism, transmedicalism, etc etc.

harassing others over fictional content you don't like (block feature is free and effective!)

contact for paraphilias that cause harm to others

cringe culture

transID people (i don't include transspecies people in this, i don't think there's anything inherently bad about being transspecies as long as it is not used as an excuse for being pro-c zoo)

radqueer community

calling anti-endos "traumascum" or saying that traumagenic systems are "lucky" to be traumagenic

harassment in general actually. if you harass or suibait people you disagree with i don't like you.

layout crds - @/layoutdump divider crds - @/saradika-graphics

[tsukiusagi43]

As an anti-contact, anti-crime paraphile I have to get a little creative with the media I consume surrounding that, and a lot of the time that means creating my own content so I can be sure it's ethically produced.

Anyway here's a moodboard.

[ang3l1c4l-b00]

mother m1ss b3l0vd washing her little girl's hair , soaping her tiny body up , watching her play with a rubber duck on the bathtub , rinsing her hair , holding her head underwater , wathcing her struggle , water spilling from the tub into mother's blouse , giggling when she lets her little girl breathe again

[thecorporatetower]

when we say "zoos, necros, pedos DNI" we're talking about pro-contact ones. the ones that encourage the actions of actually playing out that. the ones with intentions to abuse, hurt, or harm irl in a non-safe way.

anti-c paras are always welcome here, meow :3

we are still unlearning our general hatred towards anti-c zoos, necros, and pedos because of societal standards and generally just because everyone else has a general hatred towards them, we're trying really hard to unlearn our hatred. we might slip up here and there and block out of impulse.

but trust us, we're trying. we want our blog to be welcome to any anti-c paras that do not have any harmful intentions.

also if anyone wants to offer any tips or advice to us to help us get over our hatred towards the big three paras please go ahead!

-Natasha/Angel and Syntax

[confused-canid]

I CAN'T FIND THE MINES WTF 😭😭 (<- I wanna crash the RQ party in Pony town but I can't find the fugging mines)

[way2manyusernamez]

i see a lot of hate towards anti-contact and anti-abuse radqueers. you do not need to be pro contact to be radqueer. you do not need to be chill with people who think it's fine to have sex with young children. you do not need to "tolerate" and "be comfortable around" people who fuck their pets. you are not "boring" and "uncool" for being against abuse. you are not weak for having values. if thinking this makes me "boring" and "uncool" then i am proudly boring and uncool.

[jonsnowislovejonsnowislife]

Radqueers say antis are evil manipulators who want a binary system where no one is allowed to express themselves. Antis say radqueers are groomers who are all pro-contact and identify as "transnazi" and will manipulate you into being anti recovery. Sure, there are a few truths to each of these perspectives, but as someone who browses both anti and pro blogs, many of the more extreme assumptions each side has for the other are not true or misunderstood. I really think that both factions in this discussion should pay more attention to each other so they know who the enemy actually is. Personally I am an anti, but this post is for people of any opinion. Know your enemy before hating on them, everyone!

[suresuresureaursure]

hey guys, on this blog we are

pro-consent

pro-freedom

and don’t believe hurting people is okay (Unless things like self defense, fighting back etc) And are Anti-discrimination.

We do Not like you if you: Are Okay With hurting others, Promotes Hurting others, or (of your own choice) hurts others (for no justifiable reasons)

We do not care if what you do is cringe etc, Just please remember to be nice.

[pxrsonallxvv]

𐙚 obligatory intro post ₊˚⊹♡

My name is Ciel

I'm 12-16 (typically in the middle), radqueer, and comship. Body is 16.

AAM, aoc 18-35

I LOVE making friends.

My f/o's are Aqua Hoshino, Light Yagami, Yato, Jinshi, Sebastian, and ironically Ciel Phantomhive.

OSDD-1B Sys

If you wanna bmf you can follow or dm :)

dni: antis, ciel and alois doubles, fatphobes, think children can consent in any way to anything taboo, suggestive, or sexual. this also includes animals.

disc: dianas.i

tag masterlist

carrd

[tsukiusagi43]

Happy holidays to paras

Happy holidays to paras who feel gross about it

Happy holidays to paras who haven't told anyone about it

Happy holidays to paras who feel like they're carrying around a timebomb

Happy holidays to paras who don't and will never offend

Happy holidays to paras who's fantasies are just that

Happy holidays to paras who don't know why they are the way they are

Happy holidays to paras like me

[parasol-objectum]

anti contact....so fuckin boring

im only anti-contact for ones that'd harm others (whether it be from consent issues (ex; pedo, zoo, necro, biasto) or murder and the like. If that's boring for you, then clearly you should just block me.

[lilac-set]

I submitted a poll to a poll blog asking if people are rad inclus, curious how prevalent it is but i was planning on having my little ramble in the tags, but then the mod messaged me asking for a definition and getting to talk about it a little bit made me want to talk about it more, so here i am :3 this’ll be a discoursy one about (in favor of) radqueerness, and im also not willing to debate it, tw for discussion of transphobic talking points, feel free not to read if you dont want to but dni about the topic if you disagree

We’re rad inclus, thats common knowledge, but what bugs me is the definition talking about “good faith identities” and “bad faith identities”, i dont believe bad faith identities exist, im not really sure what it means. Someone suggested a bad faith identity could be like the transphobic attack helicopter meme, but thats not an identity, thats a joke. I dont support jokes at the expense of earnest identities, but in real life its not so easy to necessarily say “oh that isnt a genuine identity, thats just a joke, theyre doing it to mock us”, you cant know other people’s intentions for sure without asking them, and then what bugs me is that even if they do ask and they say no, this is genuine, they’ll still write it off as a joke and insist its harmful

I dont believe an identity can be harmful, theres no potential for someone’s self-concept to hurt someone else. The only argument that it can is “but it offends/disgusts/invalidates me!” Cool, those are your own feelings, not that person’s problem. Everyone has a right to live in whatever way feels the most fulfilling to them personally, even if no one else understands it, one person’s right to autonomy doesnt end until someone else’s starts. Someone identifying and living any particular way doesnt stop you from identifying and living any way you want to, if you dont want to be part of their life then politely excuse yourself, you have to no right to make them change for your comfort. “You cant transition into oppression” same thing. You cant harass someone into changing their identity. No matter how unfavorable the circumstances are for someone because of their identity, no matter how unfavorable you make them, you can only make someone miserable, you cant change them. Or even if you could, if someone’s identity is more malleable, you have no right to tell someone how to live, they arent materially harming you, “but it hurts my feelings!” Youre hurting their feelings, shut up, live your life and leave them alone. I primarily have transx in mind as im writing this, but it applies to everything

As for paras, cuz thats the other big point of contention i think, someone’s thoughts cant hurt you. What they do privately with other consenting adults or alone themselves as a consenting adult literally doesnt affect you in any way. I dont support harmful contact, we all know there are certain groups of people who cant meaningfully consent, but i dont think thats what the debate is on, this is about thoughtcrime. Transx is about thoughtcrime too. Thoughtcrime isnt real. No exceptions

I thought i was done but im not, i wanna talk about belief as well. We’re anti-science, we dont believe “science” does, will, can, or should have empirical evidence about all aspects of the experience of life, or that it should be the final arbiter (or any sort of factor at all) in determining if someone is valid. People are not attacking your beliefs by not conforming to them. You can believe whatever you want, and i can believe whatever i want, we dont have to threaten each other’s autonomy of belief by trying to convert each other. Can we discuss it and work together to find a right answer as long as both parties consent? Yeah, sure. But you dont need to try to change someone’s beliefs if they dont want to. You think their belief is a conspiracy theory? Cool, that doesnt affect you in any way, leave them alone about it. You think theyre going to hell? Doesnt affect you, leave them alone. Its a delusion? Guess what, leave them alone about it. Its ok if you value truth or science or religion above all else in your own life, but people have a right not to prioritize those things for themselves in theirs, and you dont have a right to try to make them conform

“But theyre spreading misinformation” You do not have the authority to enforce that whatever you believe is correct information and whatever anyone else believes thats contrary to that is misinformation. No one has that authority, no one should have that authority, people need to and have a right to curate their beliefs for themselves, not be expected to trust the government or anyone else and blindly accept whatever propaganda they might hear from a source they were told to trust