#U.S. military aid Ukraine

[latestnews-now]

Donald Trump has appointed retired General Keith Kellogg as his special envoy for Ukraine and Russia. With deep military experience and a firm 'America First' policy, Kellogg faces the challenge of resolving one of the world’s most pressing conflicts. Will his leadership bring an end to the war? Find out in this detailed analysis!

[trendynewsnow]

EU Leaders Visit Kyiv Amid Ongoing Conflict with Russia

EU Leaders’ Historic Visit to Kyiv In a significant diplomatic move, the EU’s High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, Kaja Kallas, along with European Council President Antonio Costa and Enlargement Commissioner Marta Kos, arrived in Kyiv on Sunday. This visit marks the first official trip abroad for all three leaders, reflecting the EU’s commitment to supporting Ukraine…

[global-newz]

What Trump, Putin, and Zelensky Said After Biden's Missile Nod for Ukraine

The Biden administration has made a major shift in U.S. policy by approving the use of long-range ATACMS missiles for Ukraine, enabling the country to target Russian territory for the first time since the war began. This decision, made in response to escalating tensions and North Korean involvement in the war, comes just two months before President Joe Biden hands over power to his successor, Donald Trump, who has expressed skepticism about continued U.S. military aid to Ukraine.

The Policy Shift: A Game-Changer?

For over a year, Ukraine has used U.S.-made ATACMS missiles against Russian forces in occupied Ukrainian regions, but Washington had previously barred their use on Russian soil, citing concerns that it would further escalate the conflict. The U.S. decision now gives Ukraine the green light to strike targets inside Russia, with the range of these Lockheed Martin-made missiles extending up to 300 kilometers (186 miles). Ukrainian officials are expected to target critical Russian military infrastructure, including air bases, ammunition depots, and key logistical hubs, particularly in the Kursk region near the Russian-Ukrainian border.

The Strategic Importance of Kursk

The change in policy comes amid increasing concerns about Russia's growing strength in the east of Ukraine and the involvement of North Korean troops in supporting Russian forces. The deployment of North Korean soldiers to the Kursk region, specifically, has been seen as a direct challenge to Ukraine's defense efforts. Ukraine's forces are expected to launch a counter-offensive in this region, which has been a key battleground for both Russia and Ukraine.

While the decision to provide long-range missiles could grant Ukraine an advantage, experts caution that it may not be enough to shift the momentum of the war entirely. Ukraine’s leadership hopes that the missiles will give their forces the ability to target critical Russian supply lines and military installations that could otherwise be out of reach, but the overall effect of the move remains uncertain.

Russian Reaction: Escalation Fears

Moscow's response has been one of intense alarm, with Russian officials warning that the move could lead to further escalation. Russian President Vladimir Putin has long warned that Western military support for Ukraine could cross a dangerous threshold, and he reiterated his concerns this week. "This will mean that NATO countries, the USA, and European states are effectively fighting with Russia," Putin said in September, acknowledging the growing stakes in the conflict.

Andrei Klishas, a prominent Russian Federation senator, called the U.S. decision an "overdue symbolic move" that could escalate the war to dangerous levels, predicting that it could "end with Ukrainian statehood in complete ruins by morning." Another Russian senator, Vladimir Dzhabarov, took a more dramatic tone, stating that this move could be a "very big step" toward World War III.

Trump's Response: Mixed Signals

In the United States, the decision has reignited the debate over the role of U.S. military aid to Ukraine, with former President Donald Trump and his supporters expressing mixed feelings. Trump has consistently criticized the extensive U.S. support for Ukraine, suggesting that the Biden administration's approach has been reckless and insufficiently focused on peace talks. However, Trump’s position on how to handle the war is far from clear, as some of his officials advocate for continued assistance to Ukraine, while others are pushing for a reduction in support.

Trump's son, Donald Trump Jr., voiced concerns over the potential for global conflict, writing on social media that the "military industrial complex seems to want to make sure they get World War III going before my father has a chance to create peace and save lives." His remarks reflect the ongoing division within the Republican Party on the issue of Ukraine.

On the other hand, National Security Advisor Michael Waltz suggested that Trump might speed up the delivery of weapons to Ukraine in order to pressure Russia into negotiations. This could align with Trump’s stated goal of resolving the conflict quickly—he has previously said he could bring an end to the war within a single day.

However, other members of the GOP, including Vice President-elect JD Vance, have been vocal in their opposition to further U.S. involvement. During a speech in May, Vance declared, "We’ve done more than our fair share" and expressed skepticism about continuing to fund what he described as a "never-ending war." Vance, along with other critics, argues that the U.S. should focus on domestic priorities rather than becoming further entrenched in a foreign conflict.

Global Reactions: A Symbolic Gesture or a Strategic Move?

While many Western diplomats have welcomed the decision as a necessary escalation to demonstrate unwavering support for Ukraine, some are cautious. They acknowledge that the ATACMS missiles, while powerful, may not be enough to turn the tide of the war or bring about a decisive military victory. In some circles, this move is seen as more symbolic, showing that the West remains committed to backing Ukraine despite increasing risks of direct confrontation with Russia.

The global community remains divided, with some fearing that the U.S. decision may increase the likelihood of nuclear escalation, while others believe that providing Ukraine with the necessary firepower to defend its sovereignty is essential.

The Road Ahead

As tensions continue to rise, both in Ukraine and on the international stage, the role of military aid and diplomatic negotiations will continue to be at the forefront of discussions. Ukraine is relying heavily on Western support, but the geopolitical consequences of this support, particularly in the face of an unpredictable Russian response, make the situation volatile.

The next phase of the war is likely to be shaped not only by the missiles that are now in Ukraine’s hands but also by the political decisions made in Washington, Moscow, and Kyiv. With the U.S. presidential election looming, the policy direction under the next administration could drastically alter the course of the conflict.

As the world watches closely, it remains to be seen whether this new development will bring Ukraine closer to victory or further entrench the conflict, pushing both sides toward even greater escalation.

[abignewscom]

Putin on Trump Victory, Talks on Ukraine

Putin’s Reaction to Trump’s Victory Russian President Vladimir Putin, known for his reserved nature, publicly congratulated Trump on his win. Calling him “courageous,” Putin noted the many obstacles Trump faced in his political journey. His admiration seemed rooted in Trump’s resilience and fortitude amid political challenges. Historical Relationship Between Putin and Trump The Trump-Putin…

[ivygorgon]

An open letter to the U.S. Congress

Pass Ukraine aid NOW!!!

953 so far! Help us get to 1,000 signers!

Congress is facing a critical decision on supplemental aid for Ukraine. It failed to pass supplemental aid for Ukraine in its September continuing budget resolution. I am writing to ask that you help rectify this exclusion and vote yes on Ukraine aid. Ukraine is running out of supplies. As Russian strikes on civilians continue, the U.S. cannot turn its back on Ukraine. The United States is not alone in supporting Ukraine—in fact, 19 other countries have committed a greater percentage of their GDP to help than the U.S. has. Aid for Ukraine has some of the strictest oversight and accountability mechanisms in the history of U.S. aid, helping to make sure that this aid isn’t wasted. Giving Ukraine the tools it needs to finish the fight is the right thing to do to ensure that more Russian atrocities are stopped. Moreover, of the $67 billion spent on military aid to Ukraine, 100% of that is for weapons produced in the United States — this represents a serious investment in domestic manufacturing and American jobs. Aiding Ukraine enhances American readiness and prosperity. As your constituent, I’m asking that you please vote YES and work to make sure this legislation passes. And quickly! Thanks.

▶ Created on December 8, 2023 by Jess Craven

📱 Text SIGN PMCHZF to 50409

🤯 Liked it? Text FOLLOW JESSCRAVEN101 to 50409

[qqueenofhades]

I really really REALLY need to see more people makimg the connection between trump and his russian handlers tbh.......like i know we've somehow gone through the looking glass of putin apologia but that piece abt the NYT you just posted, the bots, the interference: in the bag for trump? Yes. But i dont believe its due to his or even republican power or popularity or forcefulness.......this is a man with so much debt and kompromat thats only getting worse!! Not to sound kwazy BUT WE ARE BEING FULLY INFLITRATED and at the risk of conspiracizing i think the russians are ALSO behind the Times's demise along with so many other information centers etc. Like i KNOW these leftists love him but like. Wouldnt they care a LITTLE abt being manipulated like this???

Trump is 100% an active, willing, and eager Russian agent. That's not even paranoid conspiracy theory, that's just the only reasonable interpretation of the facts:

NOT TO MENTION that in the next two years after the Helsinki conference where Trump kowtowed to Putin in every way, the CIA admitted to losing huge and unusually high numbers of classified informants around the world (not CIA agents, but people secretly working for the American government in often-hostile countries):

Once again, this all happened when Trump was in office, when he was actively handing over CIA intel to the Kremlin against the wishes of the entire national security establishment, and which other experts have suggested was directly as a result of Trump handing over the identities of American informants to Russia, including those stationed in Russia itself:

Now, I could go on, but you get the point. Not to mention that Trump just lost a major UK-based lawsuit against Christopher Steele, the former MI6 agent who was the first to provide documents linking Trump to Russia in the controversial "Steele dossier":

And now: Trump is deeply in hock for hundreds of millions in legal fees and punitive judgments that are only increasing by the day, he somehow just came up with $90 million to appeal the judgment against E. Jean Carroll (nobody knows where he got this money either), and Russian state TV spends all their time openly salivating for Trump's return to the presidency (so he can hand over Ukraine and the rest of NATO and, as he literally said, "let Russia do whatever the hell they want.") I know we're largely numb to all the awful treasonous shit that Trump does, but like. This isn't a conspiracy theory, this is just what's going on in plain sight, and while the Online Leftists have recently become so stupid that I honestly can't tell if it's just terminal brainworms or active Russian psyops, it's strongly indicated that it is in fact a mix of both:

So, like. Just some food for thought.

[thejewishlink]

Senate Passes $1.7 Trillion Bill to Fund Gov’t, Aid Ukraine

Senate Passes $1.7 Trillion Bill to Fund Gov’t, Aid Ukraine

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Senate passed a massive $1.7 trillion spending bill Thursday that finances federal agencies through September and provides another significant round of military and economic aid to Ukraine one day after Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy’s dramatic address to a joint meeting of Congress. The bill, which runs for 4,155 pages, includes about $772.5 billion for domestic…

[ukraineblr]

This is seriously a new level of being a douchebag.

- You directly undermine Ukraine's defense effort by turning Starlinks off for the Ukrainian military right in the middle of important operations and letting the Russian military use it despite U.S. sanctions

- You spread the most idiotic "nuclear war" takes whispered to you in the ear by the Russian ambassador in the U.S. and even Putin himself

- You give voice and listen to the most insane conspiracy theorists talking about "proxy war", "biolabs", "deep state", and "money laundering", as well as blowhard demagogues and media con artists openly praising Putin and his regime

- You use your multimillion-stong global audience to directly propagate the Ukrainian surrender to Russia's war of aggression and publicly ridicule Ukraine's calls for international defense aid in its war against one of the world's largest military powers

- You directly undermined U.S. aid to Ukraine and publicly called for "killing" a long-belated aid at the U.S. Congress despite Ukraine running critically low on air defense and munitions because you and your arrogant yes-men had decided that "Putin just can't lose"

And when the situation deteriorates, particularly due to months-long delays in the most essential and urgent defense aid, this shameless douche says "I did predict it" (while again completely ignoring the fact that POLITICO makes it perfectly clear that Ukraine is 'heading for defeat' due to the West's failure to send weapons to Kyiv).

No, Elmo, you did not 'predict' anything.

You precipitated this.

This war started with Ukrainians praising you as the free world's techno hero and naming streets after you.

Now you have degraded yourself to being one of Russia's key useful idiots amid the most terrible and the largest European war of aggression since Adolf Hitler.

Keep listening to the likes of Ian Miles Cheong and David Sacks and dive deeper into your delusions and absolute moral bankruptcy.

We in Ukriane have seen our share of smartasses giving us between 48 and 72 hours two years ago.

In this war, we've been through so many impossible things that you can't even imagine, let alone "predict".

We will overcome this too -- and will get the aid, will survive as an independent nation and a democracy, and will bring peace back to Europe by derailing Russian aggression.

(c) Illia Ponomarenko

[zvaigzdelasas]

A painful reality check shows the 600-mile-long Ukrainian-Russian front in a figurative and literal freeze, draining Ukrainian resources and lives without much prospect for change in the foreseeable future. The much-anticipated Ukrainian counteroffensive of the past six months exacted a huge cost in casualties and matériel, but barely nudged the front lines. Ukraine’s top military commander has said the fight is at a “stalemate” — a notion deemed taboo not long ago — and only an unlikely technological breakthrough by one side or the other could break it. [...]

The way things are going, “Ukraine will for the foreseeable future harbor Europe’s most dangerous geopolitical fault line,” [...] an endless conflict that deepens Russia’s alienation from the West, enshrines Putinism and delays Ukraine’s integration into Europe. That, at least, is the bleak prognosis if victory in the war continues to be defined in territorial terms, specifically the goal of driving Russia out of all the Ukrainian lands it occupied in 2014 and over the past 22 months, including Crimea and a thick wedge of southeastern Ukraine, altogether about a fifth of Ukraine’s sovereign territory. But regaining territory is the wrong way to imagine the best outcome. True victory for Ukraine is to rise from the hell of the war as a strong, independent, prosperous and secure state, firmly planted in the West.[...]

the only way to find out if Mr. Putin is serious about a cease-fire, and whether one can be worked out, is to give it a try. Halting Russia well short of its goals and turning to the reconstruction and modernization of Ukraine would be lasting tributes to the Ukrainians who have made the ultimate sacrifice to preserve the existence of their nation. And no temporary armistice would forever preclude Ukraine from recovering all of its land.

With U.S. and European aid to Ukraine now in serious jeopardy, the Biden administration and European officials are quietly shifting their focus from supporting Ukraine’s goal of total victory over Russia to improving its position in an eventual negotiation to end the war, according to a Biden administration official and a European diplomat based in Washington. Such a negotiation would likely mean giving up parts of Ukraine to Russia. The White House and Pentagon publicly insist there is no official change in administration policy — that they still support Ukraine’s aim of forcing Russia’s military completely out of the country. [...]

The administration official told POLITICO Magazine this week that much of this strategic shift to defense is aimed at shoring up Ukraine’s position in any future negotiation. “That’s been our theory of the case throughout — the only way this war ends ultimately is through negotiation,” said the official, a White House spokesperson who was given anonymity because they are not authorized to speak on the record.[...]

“Those discussions [about peace talks] are starting, but [the administration] can’t back down publicly because of the political risk” to Biden, said a congressional official who is familiar with the administration’s thinking and who was granted anonymity to speak freely.[...]

The European diplomat based in Washington said that the European Union is also raising the threat of expediting Ukraine’s membership in NATO to “put the Ukrainians in the best situation possible to negotiate” with Moscow. That is a flashpoint for Putin, who is believed to be mainly interested in a strategic deal with Washington under which Ukraine will not enter NATO. [...]

For most of the conflict GOP critics have accused Biden of moving too slowly to arm the Ukrainians with the most sophisticated weaponry, such as M1A1 Abrams battle tanks, long-range precision artillery and F-16 fighter jets. In an interview in July Zelenskyy himself said the delays “provided Russia with time to mine all our lands and build several lines of defense.” [...]

The Ukrainians themselves are engaged in what is becoming a very public debate about how long they can hold out against Putin. With Ukraine running low on troops as well as weapons, Zelenskyy’s refusal to consider any fresh negotiations with Moscow is looking more and more politically untenable at home. The Ukrainian president, seeking to draft another half million troops, is facing rising domestic opposition from his military commander in chief, Gen. Valeriy Zaluzhnyi, and the mayor of Kyiv, Vitali Klitschko.

So what was all that for then [27 Dec 23]

[latestnews-now]

The Biden administration is pushing Ukraine to lower its conscription age to 18, urging the country to dramatically expand its military ranks to combat the ongoing Russia-Ukraine conflict. With the war nearing its third year, Ukraine faces a serious manpower shortage despite significant U.S. military aid. In this video, we explore the latest developments as the U.S. and European allies press Ukraine to increase its troop numbers. Will lowering the draft age be enough to turn the tide against Russia? Join us as we break down the implications of this significant shift in Ukraine’s military strategy. Stay informed on the latest updates and subscribe for more insights on the Russia-Ukraine war.

[trendynewsnow]

General Keith Kellogg's Perspective on Ukraine Conflict and NATO Membership

General Keith Kellogg’s Perspective on the Ukraine Conflict In July 2023, as he was en route to Ukraine, General Keith Kellogg articulated a robust defense of the U.S. decision to supply cluster munitions to Kyiv. He stated, “When you make the decision to support a nation at war, give all of the means necessary to finish it. War is war.” Kellogg emphasized that if the objective is for Ukrainians…

[creature-wizard]

Why americans always think is the russians intervening and not their own country ? Like you know the cia is known to intervene in elections across the world right.

Also the main social medias are all own by right wing billionaires like elon musk.

But nahh it must be the evil russians!

Because Russian bots are a real thing, maybe?????????????? Because Russia pushed Jill Stein to split the vote???????????? Because we know damn good and well that the Russian government does, in fact, do this shit?

[comeonamericawakeup]

A running cliché in the mainstream media is that the U.S. is "polarized" into two "extreme camps," said Jennifer Rubin.

This is simply untrue. Democrats have some far-left elements, but President Biden and the party's congressional leaders have repeatedly proven they are willing "to move to the center to get bipartisan support." Not so the Republicans, who "have become radicalized and unmovable." Republicans recently buried a tough bipartisan border bill they helped forge because Donald Trump feared it would be effective. They overwhelmingly opposed the Infrastructure Bill and the Chips Act to help fund semiconductor factories in the U.S., and refused to convict an impeached Trump for inciting a violent insurrection.

They are denying military aid critical to Ukraine's survival, and siding with Russian dictator Vladimir Putin. GOP House Speaker Mike Johnson "is a Christian nationalist who thinks he was chosen by God and takes direction from the Bible, not the Constitution." Virtually every Republican official now is endorsing Donald Trump, "the most extreme, racist candidate since the Civil War," who warns that immigrants are "poisoning the blood" of the country. That's not polarization. That's "one party going off the deep end."

THE WEEK March 22, 2024

[rederiswrites]

Why are we afraid of a Trump presidency? Well, here's the beginning of political historian Heather Cox Richardson's daily writeup:

April 30, 2024 (Tuesday) This morning, Time magazine published a cover story by Eric Cortellessa about what Trump is planning for a second term. Based on two interviews with Trump and conversations with more than a dozen of his closest advisors, the story lays out Trump’s conviction that he was “too nice” in his first term and that he would not make such a mistake again. Cortellessa writes that Trump intends to establish “an imperial presidency that would reshape America and its role in the world.” He plans to use the military to round up, put in camps, and deport more than 11 million people. He is willing to permit Republican-dominated states to monitor pregnancies and prosecute people who violate abortion bans. He will shape the laws by refusing to release funds appropriated by Congress (as he did in 2019 to try to get Ukraine president Volodymyr Zelensky to smear Hunter Biden). He would like to bring the Department of Justice under his own control, pardoning those convicted of attacking the U.S. Capitol on January 6, 2021, and ending the U.S. system of an independent judiciary. In a second Trump presidency, the U.S. might not come to the aid of a European or Asian ally that Trump thinks isn’t paying enough for its own defense. Trump would, Cortelessa wrote, “gut the U.S. civil service, deploy the National Guard to American cities as he sees fit, close the White House pandemic-preparedness office, and staff his Administration with acolytes who back his false assertion that the 2020 election was stolen.” To that list, former political director of the AFL-CIO Michael Podhorzer added on social media that if Trump wins, “he could replace [Supreme Court justices Clarence] Thomas, [Samuel] Alito, and 40+ federal judges over 75 with young zealots.” “I ask him, Don’t you see why many Americans see such talk of dictatorship as contrary to our most cherished principles?” Cortellessa wrote. No, Trump said. “‘I think a lot of people like it.”

[mapsontheweb]

U.S. President Biden has Signed into Law the Foreign Aid Bill which was Approved last night by the Senate and will see upwards of $95 Billion in Military Assistance provided to Ukraine, Israel, and Taiwan.