#U.S.-Russia Relations

[abignewscom]

Putin on Trump Victory, Talks on Ukraine

Putin’s Reaction to Trump’s Victory Russian President Vladimir Putin, known for his reserved nature, publicly congratulated Trump on his win. Calling him “courageous,” Putin noted the many obstacles Trump faced in his political journey. His admiration seemed rooted in Trump’s resilience and fortitude amid political challenges. Historical Relationship Between Putin and Trump The Trump-Putin…

[jdunlevy]

The U.S. Is Paying Billions to Russia’s Nuclear Agency. Here’s Why.

Nuclear power companies rely on cheap enriched uranium made in Russia. That geopolitical dilemma is intensifying as climate change underscores the need for emissions-free energy.

By Max Bearak, nytimes.com

The United States’ reliance on nuclear power is primed to grow as the country aims to decrease reliance on fossil fuels. But no American-owned company enriches uranium. The United States once dominated the market, until a swirl of historical factors, including an enriched-uranium-buying deal between Russia and the United States designed to promote Russia’s peaceful nuclear program after the Soviet Union’s collapse, enabled Russia to corner half the global market. The United States ceased enriching uranium entirely.

[hisradiantfire]

Disbelief, Reactions to MLK Jr.

In this thought-provoking episode, we confront the uncomfortable truths surrounding Martin Luther King Jr. and the broader implications of deception in both the Church and society. Join Christopher as he delve into the journey of discovering hidden narratives and the impact of misinformation on our understanding of historical figures. Through personal reflections and insightful thoughts, we explore the importance of truth, the consequences of ignorance, and the necessity for deeper biblical knowledge in navigating today's complex spiritual landscape.

Here is the latest from Radiant Fire Radio...

[firstoccupier]

Beneath the Surface: The Hidden Cost of Foreign Aid Suspension

In a striking political maneuver, Senator Marco Rubio has moved to suspend nearly all US foreign aid, a decision that has ignited outrage among lawmakers and global allies. This action is perceived as a significant betrayal of the bipartisan efforts that culminated in a carefully crafted aid package, aimed at assisting nations under threat, particularly from Russian aggression. Congress’s…

[narrative-theory]

U.S. vs. Iran: Decades of Conflict Explained – Brian Berletić

[latestnews-now]

U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken embarks on a crucial European visit, attending NATO’s final foreign ministers meeting before President Biden leaves office. With Ukraine's war against Russia and transatlantic security as key issues, find out how the Biden administration plans to strengthen Ukraine's position before the power transition. Stay tuned for the latest developments from Brussels and Malta.

[global-newz]

What Trump, Putin, and Zelensky Said After Biden's Missile Nod for Ukraine

The Biden administration has made a major shift in U.S. policy by approving the use of long-range ATACMS missiles for Ukraine, enabling the country to target Russian territory for the first time since the war began. This decision, made in response to escalating tensions and North Korean involvement in the war, comes just two months before President Joe Biden hands over power to his successor, Donald Trump, who has expressed skepticism about continued U.S. military aid to Ukraine.

The Policy Shift: A Game-Changer?

For over a year, Ukraine has used U.S.-made ATACMS missiles against Russian forces in occupied Ukrainian regions, but Washington had previously barred their use on Russian soil, citing concerns that it would further escalate the conflict. The U.S. decision now gives Ukraine the green light to strike targets inside Russia, with the range of these Lockheed Martin-made missiles extending up to 300 kilometers (186 miles). Ukrainian officials are expected to target critical Russian military infrastructure, including air bases, ammunition depots, and key logistical hubs, particularly in the Kursk region near the Russian-Ukrainian border.

The Strategic Importance of Kursk

The change in policy comes amid increasing concerns about Russia's growing strength in the east of Ukraine and the involvement of North Korean troops in supporting Russian forces. The deployment of North Korean soldiers to the Kursk region, specifically, has been seen as a direct challenge to Ukraine's defense efforts. Ukraine's forces are expected to launch a counter-offensive in this region, which has been a key battleground for both Russia and Ukraine.

While the decision to provide long-range missiles could grant Ukraine an advantage, experts caution that it may not be enough to shift the momentum of the war entirely. Ukraine’s leadership hopes that the missiles will give their forces the ability to target critical Russian supply lines and military installations that could otherwise be out of reach, but the overall effect of the move remains uncertain.

Russian Reaction: Escalation Fears

Moscow's response has been one of intense alarm, with Russian officials warning that the move could lead to further escalation. Russian President Vladimir Putin has long warned that Western military support for Ukraine could cross a dangerous threshold, and he reiterated his concerns this week. "This will mean that NATO countries, the USA, and European states are effectively fighting with Russia," Putin said in September, acknowledging the growing stakes in the conflict.

Andrei Klishas, a prominent Russian Federation senator, called the U.S. decision an "overdue symbolic move" that could escalate the war to dangerous levels, predicting that it could "end with Ukrainian statehood in complete ruins by morning." Another Russian senator, Vladimir Dzhabarov, took a more dramatic tone, stating that this move could be a "very big step" toward World War III.

Trump's Response: Mixed Signals

In the United States, the decision has reignited the debate over the role of U.S. military aid to Ukraine, with former President Donald Trump and his supporters expressing mixed feelings. Trump has consistently criticized the extensive U.S. support for Ukraine, suggesting that the Biden administration's approach has been reckless and insufficiently focused on peace talks. However, Trump’s position on how to handle the war is far from clear, as some of his officials advocate for continued assistance to Ukraine, while others are pushing for a reduction in support.

Trump's son, Donald Trump Jr., voiced concerns over the potential for global conflict, writing on social media that the "military industrial complex seems to want to make sure they get World War III going before my father has a chance to create peace and save lives." His remarks reflect the ongoing division within the Republican Party on the issue of Ukraine.

On the other hand, National Security Advisor Michael Waltz suggested that Trump might speed up the delivery of weapons to Ukraine in order to pressure Russia into negotiations. This could align with Trump’s stated goal of resolving the conflict quickly—he has previously said he could bring an end to the war within a single day.

However, other members of the GOP, including Vice President-elect JD Vance, have been vocal in their opposition to further U.S. involvement. During a speech in May, Vance declared, "We’ve done more than our fair share" and expressed skepticism about continuing to fund what he described as a "never-ending war." Vance, along with other critics, argues that the U.S. should focus on domestic priorities rather than becoming further entrenched in a foreign conflict.

Global Reactions: A Symbolic Gesture or a Strategic Move?

While many Western diplomats have welcomed the decision as a necessary escalation to demonstrate unwavering support for Ukraine, some are cautious. They acknowledge that the ATACMS missiles, while powerful, may not be enough to turn the tide of the war or bring about a decisive military victory. In some circles, this move is seen as more symbolic, showing that the West remains committed to backing Ukraine despite increasing risks of direct confrontation with Russia.

The global community remains divided, with some fearing that the U.S. decision may increase the likelihood of nuclear escalation, while others believe that providing Ukraine with the necessary firepower to defend its sovereignty is essential.

The Road Ahead

As tensions continue to rise, both in Ukraine and on the international stage, the role of military aid and diplomatic negotiations will continue to be at the forefront of discussions. Ukraine is relying heavily on Western support, but the geopolitical consequences of this support, particularly in the face of an unpredictable Russian response, make the situation volatile.

The next phase of the war is likely to be shaped not only by the missiles that are now in Ukraine’s hands but also by the political decisions made in Washington, Moscow, and Kyiv. With the U.S. presidential election looming, the policy direction under the next administration could drastically alter the course of the conflict.

As the world watches closely, it remains to be seen whether this new development will bring Ukraine closer to victory or further entrench the conflict, pushing both sides toward even greater escalation.

[futurefatum]

⚫☢ NUCLEAR IRAN! US THREATENS WW3 WITH RUSSIA! ECONOMIC CRASH! BIRD FLU! (Tone: 50)

Escalating tensions w/ Iran, potential U.S. market crash, & bird flu crises loom. Global issues unpacked. #Geopolitics #EconomicInstability #Iran

Posted November 15th, 2025 by @CanadianPrepper ABOUT THIS VIDEO: This video presents a broad overview of various current global geopolitical and social crises, with a particular emphasis on potential conflicts involving Israel, Iran, and the United States, along with other topics like economic instability and bird flu outbreaks in North America. It asserts that nuclear conflict may occur soon,…

[reportwire]

After one year of war, how to break the stalemate in Ukraine?

February 24 will mark one year since Russian tanks rolled over the border into Ukraine. As it stands there is still no end in sight and the U.S. is facing increasing pressure to provide military aid in the form of high tech equipment such as F-16 fighters and M1 Abrams tanks. David Silbey is an associate professor of history at Cornell University where he specializes in military history, defense…

[liberalsarecool]

The United Nations Security Council on Monday passed its first resolution calling for a Gaza cease-fire after four failed attempts. The United States abstained, allowing it to pass.

The resolution, backed by 14 nations, including China and Russia, demands an immediate cease-fire during the Islamic holy month of Ramadan and the release of all hostages.

Four previous cease-fire resolutions had failed, including one proposed by the United States on Friday. The U.S. abstention is likely to further strain U.S. relations with Israel amid sharp disagreements over Israel’s planned military offensive in Rafah.

KEEP UP THE PRESSURE!!

[pissvortex]

Imperialism under Biden/Harris:

- Started war with Russia over natural gas

- Sponsors genocide in Palestine

- Continued attempts to overthrow social democrats in Latin America

- Continued sabre rattling against China and the DPRK

Imperialism under Trump:

- Continued sabre rattling against China (except Trump seems fine not propping up Taiwan)

- Continued attempts to overthrow social democrats in Latin America

- Assassinated Qasem Soleimani

- Bombed Syria

So, overall, it's two spur of the moment bombings versus two entire wars. Plus Trump negotiated with the DPRK and wants to dismantle NATO. For idiotic reasons, obviously, but he's objectively the anti-imperialist option.

you seem serious so: You have a very juvenile understanding of imperialism that seemingly only includes military action. Even if Trump did dismantle NATO it would not change America’s status as the finance capital / usury state of the world - I see no reason to doubt what he says openly is his intention when he says this move would actually increase American financial domination. That is imperialism, albeit a deviation from the current neoliberal global partnership imperialism because Trump is an American exceptionalist and (perhaps naively) believes in total American domination. He doesn’t really care about traditional conservative/liberal notions of diplomacy or world relations, he just likes watching the numbers go up. Every time there was a dip in the stock market he would just pump it with a trillion more dollars from the federal reserve. He correctly identifies America as the world’s money printer, and since the world has a U.S. currency standard, he has no reason to fear this backfiring. It’s why he’s pursuing this idiotic tariff idea, he knows the rest of the world will take a lot of punishment to continue to be “in” on American finance and he can make his petit bourgeois constituents happy with free money for hare-brained small business. He leaves the actual big finance and megacorporations alone and lets small businesses live in this fantasy realm of free government funding forever. It’s like a fake economy for complacency layered under the real one. This is not anti-imperialist, it’s petit-bourgeois populism and it isn’t better by any means.

[hisradiantfire]

USPS: Help My Mother get her Mail...

  In this episode, we tackle a pressing consumer issue that many face but few discuss openly: the frustrations surrounding mail delivery, particularly for the elderly. Our host shares a personal story about their mother's mail being misdirected and delayed, leading to missed bills and emotional distress. We delve into the challenges of dealing with postal services, the lack of accountability from local representatives, and the impact on those who rely on timely mail delivery. Join us as we explore potential solutions and rally for change in our postal system!

    Here is the latest from Radiant Fire Radio...

[saywhat-politics]

Head of RT Margarita Simonyan, a decorated state TV propagandist and Kremlin insider, has spilled not only Russia’s hopes and dreams for Donald Trump’s second term in office but also Moscow’s strategy for suckering him in.

She believes that Russian President Vladimir Putin has an irresistible sway over Trump and will extract the desired outcome—but only if they meet face-to-face, without any influence or interference from other American power brokers, à la Helsinki, where the two men held discussions in secret.

The head of RT is convinced that a personal meeting between Trump and Putin will totally reverse the course taken by the Biden administration, including the sanctions that banned her propaganda network from American airwaves. Speaking on the program The Right To Know, Simonyan predicted that the incoming Trump administration would attempt to establish good relations with Russia and lift multiple sanctions. According to her, RT has good reason to believe that under Trump, it will return to the U.S. cable networks.

[narrative-theory]

BRICS: New Global Financial Order?

BRICS: Defiance of U. S.?: New Global Financial Order?