#Global Security

[davidaugust]

“Ukrainians are also fighting for our safety and for everyone’s freedom. By resisting Russian dictatorship, they show that democracy can defend itself. By defending their borders, they are protecting the international order and holding off chaos. By fighting Russia alone, they protect Europe. By showing how hard offensive operations are, Ukrainians make a Chinese war in the Pacific less likely. By fighting a conventional war against a nuclear power, they are making nuclear proliferation and nuclear war less likely.”

Tell Speaker Johnson to support Ukraine now:

+1-202-225-4000

https://edition.cnn.com/2024/04/10/opinions/sean-penn-barbra-streisand-imgaine-dragons-congress-ukraine-snyder/index.html

[usa-town-talks]

Britain and Mauritius Reach Sovereignty Agreement on Chagos Islands

Britain announced on Thursday a significant agreement to transfer sovereignty of the Chagos Islands to Mauritius. This deal will enable individuals displaced decades ago to return home while allowing London to maintain operational control of the UK-US military base on Diego Garcia.

British Foreign Minister David Lammy stated that the agreement ensures the continued operation of Diego Garcia, a strategically important military base jointly managed with the United States. The deal also paves the way for Mauritius to resettle its population on the islands, which were evacuated years ago.

“This government inherited a situation where the long-term, secure operation of the Diego Garcia military base was under threat due to contested sovereignty and ongoing legal challenges,” Lammy said. “Today’s agreement secures this vital military base for the future and strengthens our role in safeguarding global security, while also shutting down any potential use of the Indian Ocean as a dangerous illegal migration route to the UK.”

Britain has maintained control over the region since 1814, having detached the Chagos Islands from Mauritius in 1965. This move was made to establish the British Indian Ocean Territory, and in the early 1970s, nearly 2,000 residents were forcibly relocated to Mauritius and the Seychelles to facilitate the construction of the airbase.

In 2019, the World Court ruled that Britain should relinquish control of the islands, condemning the forced removal of the population in the 1970s to accommodate the US airbase.

The recent political agreement between Britain and Mauritius has garnered support from both the United States and India.

[tmarshconnors]

STOP HELPING UKRAINE!

The war between Russia and Ukraine has dragged on for over a year now, and the West, particularly the United States and the United Kingdom, has poured billions into military aid, equipment, and financial assistance for Ukraine. The argument has been that Ukraine needs our support to defend itself against Russian aggression, which, in theory, could pose a broader threat to Europe and even global security. But is this endless funding truly in the best interest of our nations? I argue that it is not.

Unintended Consequences: Economic Strain on the West

Let’s start with the practical issue: the economic toll on our countries. We are facing significant domestic challenges – from economic recessions and rising inflation to unemployment and energy crises. Yet, despite these struggles, billions of taxpayer dollars and pounds continue to flow out to fund a conflict halfway across the world.

Consider the impact on everyday citizens. Energy prices have skyrocketed, in part because of sanctions on Russian oil and gas, but also due to our funding of this seemingly never-ending conflict. Instead of investing in infrastructure, healthcare, or education at home, we’re propping up a country that, quite frankly, needs to take responsibility for its own survival.

What’s Really at Stake?

While it's easy to frame this war as a moral crusade against tyranny, it’s far more complex than that. Ukraine is not a perfect democracy, and its issues with corruption are well-documented. Are we truly supporting a nation based on democratic ideals, or are we merely caught in a geopolitical tug-of-war with Russia? Either way, the continued funneling of funds is draining resources that could be better spent elsewhere.

Moreover, the West has already armed Ukraine to the teeth, providing advanced weaponry and training. The Ukrainian military is now well-equipped to hold its own. So why are we still providing an endless cash flow? At what point do we say, "Enough is enough"?

Ukraine's Responsibility to Defend Itself

At some point, we must allow Ukraine to stand on its own two feet. Nations throughout history have had to fend for themselves in times of crisis, and Ukraine should be no exception. This is their fight, after all. If they wish to preserve their sovereignty and independence, it’s their duty to do so.

One might argue that cutting off funding would be abandoning Ukraine to a Russian takeover. But that's an oversimplified view. Ukraine has proven its resilience time and time again. They have the will to fight; what they now need is the determination to do so without relying on endless Western support. The question isn't whether they can defend themselves – it's whether they will if left to their own devices.

Western Nations Need to Prioritize Their Own Citizens

The well-being of our own citizens should always be our primary concern. Our governments are elected to serve ourinterests, not to act as the world's police force or charity. With millions struggling to make ends meet, is it really fair to continue sending our hard-earned money to a foreign conflict?

We need to refocus on issues that matter at home: rebuilding our economies, strengthening national security, and addressing the energy crisis. Instead of being distracted by far-off wars, let’s direct our efforts toward solving our domestic problems.

The Risk of Prolonging the Conflict

Finally, there's the risk that by continuing to fund Ukraine, we are merely prolonging the conflict. If both sides know that Western money and weapons will keep flowing, where's the incentive for peace? By stepping back, we encourage diplomatic solutions rather than an endless military stalemate.

It’s time for the West to rethink its role in the Russia-Ukraine war. While supporting Ukraine was initially seen as a moral and strategic necessity, the continued funding is proving to be more of a burden than a benefit. Ukraine has the means to defend itself. Now it must find the resolve to do so independently. Our priorities should shift back to addressing the needs of our citizens, and it's high time we let Ukraine face Russia on its own terms.

After all, every nation must ultimately be responsible for its own survival.

[latestnews-now]

Russia’s latest nuclear doctrine has lowered the threshold for using atomic weapons, raising global concerns. This update ties Belarus to Moscow’s policies, expands military dangers, and comes as the U.S. allows Ukraine to strike inside Russian territory with ATACMS missiles. What does this mean for the ongoing war in Ukraine and global security? Watch to learn more!

Subscribe now to stay informed and never miss a beat on what’s happening around the globe!

[ainfinity8]

How Long-Range Missiles Impact Global Security

How Long-Range Missiles Impact Global Security

6 minutes In recent years, long-range missiles have become a critical part of modern warfare. They are capable of striking targets hundreds or even thousands of kilometers away. These powerful weapons have played a significant role in various conflicts, including the ongoing war between Russia and Ukraine. It is essential to understand how long-range missiles operate. Knowing the potential…

[olivesbest]

Instead of doing what ALLATRA has been doing the best - studying and looking for climate solutions - we're forced to fight for our rights and democracy for all.

[alphasheesh]

Going Ballistic : Scott Ritter on Iran’s Unprecedented Military Display #RealScottRitter #Iran #Israel #MOATS

In a recent interview, military analyst Scott Ritter delves into Iran’s exceptional military demonstration, highlighting its capability to impose devastating costs on any aggressor. Ritter emphasizes that an attack on Iran could lead to severe consequences, particularly for Israel, potentially marking a terminal threat. Explore the insights behind Iran’s strategic deterrence and the implications for regional and global security.

[gurutrends]

North Korea threatens global security

North Korea has ratified a landmark defense treaty with Russia, state media reported on Tuesday, a pact that seals deeper security cooperation between the two countries amid Moscow’s war in Ukraine. The state news agency KCNA said the agreement “was ratified in the form of a decree” signed by North Korean leader, Kim Jong Un, on November 11. The announcement comes a day after Moscow said that…

[davidaugust]

The Speaker of the US House of Representatives Mike Johnson has given the Ukrainian city of Avdiivka to Russia.

He did this by blocking a bill that would supply ammunition to Ukrainian soldiers, despite the widespread support in Congress and the American people.

“White House National Security Council spokesperson Adrienne Watson called the withdrawal ‘the cost of Congressional inaction.’”

https://apnews.com/article/russia-ukraine-war-avdiivka-c31eb7439d1983532a3f940061efe6e7

[trendynewsnow]

North Korea's Troop Deployment and Its Impact on Global Security

North Korea’s Troop Deployment: A Growing Threat to Global Security The recent deployment of North Korean troops in support of Russia’s aggressive maneuvers against Ukraine poses a significant threat not only to Europe but also to the United States. NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte has raised alarms about the implications of this military collaboration, particularly in light of the potential…