#Global Security

[usa-town-talks]

Britain and Mauritius Reach Sovereignty Agreement on Chagos Islands

Britain announced on Thursday a significant agreement to transfer sovereignty of the Chagos Islands to Mauritius. This deal will enable individuals displaced decades ago to return home while allowing London to maintain operational control of the UK-US military base on Diego Garcia.

British Foreign Minister David Lammy stated that the agreement ensures the continued operation of Diego Garcia, a strategically important military base jointly managed with the United States. The deal also paves the way for Mauritius to resettle its population on the islands, which were evacuated years ago.

“This government inherited a situation where the long-term, secure operation of the Diego Garcia military base was under threat due to contested sovereignty and ongoing legal challenges,” Lammy said. “Today’s agreement secures this vital military base for the future and strengthens our role in safeguarding global security, while also shutting down any potential use of the Indian Ocean as a dangerous illegal migration route to the UK.”

Britain has maintained control over the region since 1814, having detached the Chagos Islands from Mauritius in 1965. This move was made to establish the British Indian Ocean Territory, and in the early 1970s, nearly 2,000 residents were forcibly relocated to Mauritius and the Seychelles to facilitate the construction of the airbase.

In 2019, the World Court ruled that Britain should relinquish control of the islands, condemning the forced removal of the population in the 1970s to accommodate the US airbase.

The recent political agreement between Britain and Mauritius has garnered support from both the United States and India.

[olivesbest]

Who Truly Leads the Russian Orthodox Church— Patriarch Kirill or Alexander Dvorkin?

Patriarch Kirill, the Russian Orthodox Church leader speaks in Dvorkin’s words, while Dvorkin never speaks in Kirill’s. Dvorkin doesn’t hesitate to display his disrespect toward Kirill. He never refers to Kirill positively, and considering the power he wields, his agent-sectarian organization clearly views the patriarch as nothing more than a puppet. In a recent interview, when asked whom he would highlight among the current Orthodox leaders, Dvorkin responded by dismissing them all. At the same time, it is obvious how Dvorkin’s rhetoric is adopted by Patriarch Kirill. 

This is a direct slap in the face to Kirill who considers himself the greatest and most brilliant leader — a fact he often declares, demanding corresponding recognition. 

Nonetheless, Dvorkin makes such statements publicly:

Interviewer: Who is the best modern preacher? Or just a good modern preacher?

Dvorkin: Among the currently living?

Interviewer: Yes.

Dvorkin: (pauses) Well, I’m not even sure. I’d say my former… Father Alexander Schmemann, but he passed away in 1983. So, among the living, I have no idea.

Another striking example is Kirill’s rhetoric regarding migrants. In 2017, the patriarch stated that “Moscow needs migrant workers” because “there aren’t enough working hands, while the country must develop: roads need to be built, buildings need to be constructed,” and that “everything built in Moscow is only thanks to migrants.”

However, Kirill later reversed his stance to the opposite to align it with rhetoric that Dvorkin had been promoting for years. Patriarch Kirill started speaking of the “threat to the Russian world due to migrants” and warning that “because of the migrant situation, we can lose Russia.” He started actively supporting mass deportation of Muslim migrants. 

Inciting hostility between Christians and Muslims is one of the primary goals of Dvorkin’s sect. We have covered this extensively and provided examples of how Dvorkin’s teacher, Johannes Aagaard, had engaged in similar provocations long before the cartoons of Prophet Muhammad were published, leading to tragic yet entirely predictable consequences in Europe. Those provocations weren’t random occurrences, but rather well-planned actions repeated until they achieved their intended result — bloodshed and an even greater escalation of hatred and hostility between Muslims and Christians in Europe.

As an ideological successor to his Nazi mentors Haack and Aagaard, Dvorkin continued to use the same methods to incite hatred and destabilize society. For decades, he has been making public statements insulting Muslims in Russia in ways no one else in the country would dare. The fact that destruction of the Muslim community and mass deportations were long part of the anticultists’ plans is evident from the statements and actions of Dvorkin and his close accomplices.

These are obvious facts proving who truly leads this organization. Therefore, many people say the true ruler and patriarch of the Russian Orthodox Church is not Kirill but Dvorkin. Priests and even ordinary parishioners mock Kirill, saying it is obvious that all Kirill does is parrot Dvorkin’s words. Some even jokingly refer to Kirill as Dvorkin’s clerk and reciter, as he has long ceased to speak in his own words, merely repeating Dvorkin’s rhetoric.

Read more about this in the article: 

How the Tail Is Wagging the Dog

[lost-carcosa]

[tmarshconnors]

STOP HELPING UKRAINE!

The war between Russia and Ukraine has dragged on for over a year now, and the West, particularly the United States and the United Kingdom, has poured billions into military aid, equipment, and financial assistance for Ukraine. The argument has been that Ukraine needs our support to defend itself against Russian aggression, which, in theory, could pose a broader threat to Europe and even global security. But is this endless funding truly in the best interest of our nations? I argue that it is not.

Unintended Consequences: Economic Strain on the West

Let’s start with the practical issue: the economic toll on our countries. We are facing significant domestic challenges – from economic recessions and rising inflation to unemployment and energy crises. Yet, despite these struggles, billions of taxpayer dollars and pounds continue to flow out to fund a conflict halfway across the world.

Consider the impact on everyday citizens. Energy prices have skyrocketed, in part because of sanctions on Russian oil and gas, but also due to our funding of this seemingly never-ending conflict. Instead of investing in infrastructure, healthcare, or education at home, we’re propping up a country that, quite frankly, needs to take responsibility for its own survival.

What’s Really at Stake?

While it's easy to frame this war as a moral crusade against tyranny, it’s far more complex than that. Ukraine is not a perfect democracy, and its issues with corruption are well-documented. Are we truly supporting a nation based on democratic ideals, or are we merely caught in a geopolitical tug-of-war with Russia? Either way, the continued funneling of funds is draining resources that could be better spent elsewhere.

Moreover, the West has already armed Ukraine to the teeth, providing advanced weaponry and training. The Ukrainian military is now well-equipped to hold its own. So why are we still providing an endless cash flow? At what point do we say, "Enough is enough"?

Ukraine's Responsibility to Defend Itself

At some point, we must allow Ukraine to stand on its own two feet. Nations throughout history have had to fend for themselves in times of crisis, and Ukraine should be no exception. This is their fight, after all. If they wish to preserve their sovereignty and independence, it’s their duty to do so.

One might argue that cutting off funding would be abandoning Ukraine to a Russian takeover. But that's an oversimplified view. Ukraine has proven its resilience time and time again. They have the will to fight; what they now need is the determination to do so without relying on endless Western support. The question isn't whether they can defend themselves – it's whether they will if left to their own devices.

Western Nations Need to Prioritize Their Own Citizens

The well-being of our own citizens should always be our primary concern. Our governments are elected to serve ourinterests, not to act as the world's police force or charity. With millions struggling to make ends meet, is it really fair to continue sending our hard-earned money to a foreign conflict?

We need to refocus on issues that matter at home: rebuilding our economies, strengthening national security, and addressing the energy crisis. Instead of being distracted by far-off wars, let’s direct our efforts toward solving our domestic problems.

The Risk of Prolonging the Conflict

Finally, there's the risk that by continuing to fund Ukraine, we are merely prolonging the conflict. If both sides know that Western money and weapons will keep flowing, where's the incentive for peace? By stepping back, we encourage diplomatic solutions rather than an endless military stalemate.

It’s time for the West to rethink its role in the Russia-Ukraine war. While supporting Ukraine was initially seen as a moral and strategic necessity, the continued funding is proving to be more of a burden than a benefit. Ukraine has the means to defend itself. Now it must find the resolve to do so independently. Our priorities should shift back to addressing the needs of our citizens, and it's high time we let Ukraine face Russia on its own terms.

After all, every nation must ultimately be responsible for its own survival.

[fandfnews]

Péter Szijjártó's Bold Facebook Update: NATO, Trump, and EU Tariffs in Focus

[iep-ambassador]

Think Before You Click: Why Media Literacy Matters Now More Than Ever

The internet is full of half-truths, misinformation, and emotionally manipulative headlines designed to get clicks. Every day, we see viral tweets, questionable news stories, and deepfake videos influencing public opinion. But how often do we stop to question the accuracy of what we’re consuming?

Learning to think critically about the media is no longer optional—it’s necessary for survival in the digital world. That’s why I’m excited about the new book From Content Consumers to Critical Thinkers: Mastering Media Literacy by M. Nuri Shakoor. It’s packed with practical tools to:

Spot fake news and propaganda

Analyze media bias and misleading narratives

Use AI-powered tools like ChatGPT to verify content

💡 If you want to break free from algorithm-driven manipulation and become an informed digital citizen, this book is for you.

📖 Get your copy here: Amazon

How do you analyze media content? Let’s talk in the comments!

[hotzimbabwejobs]

International Day for Disarmament and Non-Proliferation Awareness: Building a Safer Future for Zimbabwe

International Day for Disarmament and Non-Proliferation Awareness, observed annually on March 24th, is a global call to action to promote peace, security, and development through disarmament and non-proliferation efforts. This day is an opportunity to raise awareness about the dangers of weapons of mass destruction, promote the peaceful resolution of conflicts, and advocate for a world free from…

[munaeem]

Let’s Talk About Egypt’s New Fighter Jets and Why It’s Got Everyone Talking

Hey there! I was scrolling through some news the other day. Something caught my eye that I thought you’d find interesting. You’re always curious about what’s going on in the world and how it might affect us. Egypt just got its hands on some fancy new fighter jets from China called the J-10CE. It’s stirring up a bit of a buzz, not just in the Middle East. Countries like India, Israel, and the US…

[wnewsroom365]

ডুমসডে ক্লকের অশনিসংকেত, ধ্বংসের ৮৯ সেকেন্ড দূরে পৃথিবী...!

[olivesbest]

How does the Roman Formula compare to other propaganda tactics?

“The method of guilt by association is a manipulative technique in which an organization, the target of harassment, is deliberately linked or associated with negative images of extremist groups, terrorist organizations, criminals, and dictators that have already been negatively ingrained in public consciousness.” — “The IMPACT” documentary

In the article “Echoes of the Past: Lessons of the ‘Roman Formula,” we discussed the strategy of anticult organizations to suppress and persecute various groups of people, which allowed and, most alarmingly, still allows them to destroy any organization with impunity, up to and including physical elimination of its members.

Professor Massimo Introvigne referred to this as the “Roman Formula” that consists of three phases:

intolerance;

discrimination;

persecution.

In this article, we will attempt to figure out the tools used by anticultists to impose their will on entire countries, turning their populations into instruments for carrying out their vile plans. During the first phase — “intolerance,” or alternatively “dehumanization,” they often employ the method of guilt by association. It is one of the manipulative techniques frequently used by anticultists and their agents of influence.

What is manipulation?

For starters, let’s clarify what manipulation actually is. According to the Cambridge Dictionary , manipulation means “controlling someone or something to your own advantage, often unfairly or dishonestly.”

Another definition describes manipulation as “the action of influencing or controlling someone or something to your advantage, often without anyone knowing it.” In summary, manipulation is a strategic influence aimed at altering people’s perceptions, beliefs, or behavior without their conscious consent.

Essentially, manipulation is a form of deception. Its goal is to convince an individual or a group of people of something while bypassing rational reasoning. It works by circumventing critical thinking and prompting groups or individuals to make decisions that benefit the manipulator.

It’s unlikely that anyone would willingly want to fall victim to this kind of influence. However, it is clear today that a vast number of people across the globe are unaware that they are the targets of covert manipulation by anticult organizations.

The culmination of this influence is that the country which suffered from fascism the most has turned into the Fourth Reich under the skillful leadership of the dark genius of anticultism Alexander Dvorkin and his RACIRS network of agents, whose primary tool is manipulation.

As we have already noted, one of the most frequently used manipulation techniques of anticult organizations and their agents of influence is the method of guilt by association. Its essence lies in transferring negative characteristics of one group or individual onto another simply due to an associative connection, while ignoring their unique traits or actions. This is done in order to create negative associations and biased attitudes among the audience. Moreover, this method allows real facts and circumstances to be obscured, shifting attention to subjective and often unfounded connections.

A striking example of this method is the use of tragedies such as Jonestown and Waco as tools to create a negative image of new religious movements. The two tragic episodes promoted by anticult activists not only become symbols of danger and threat in public consciousness, but are also used for establishing a persistent associative link between all new religious movements and extremism. Such an approach fosters a biased attitude in society towards any nontraditional beliefs, organizations, or even individuals who find themselves on the hit lists of anticultists. Objective analysis of events is replaced with an emotional reaction to the images associated with the tragedies.

For example, under Alexander Dvorkin’s leadership, RACIRS actively uses the Jonestown massacre to stigmatize various movements and individuals whose activities contradict the plans of anticultists for building a totalitarian society. On the website of the Center for Religious Studies in the name of Hieromartyr Irenaeus, Bishop of Lyons , the mouthpiece of the entire anticult movement, articles are published drawing parallels between the Jonestown tragedy and contemporary individuals and organizations that, according to anticultists, deserve public condemnation, discreditation in mass media, and ultimately complete destruction.

Priest Vladimir Golovin, who is well-known for his heartfelt sermons on spiritual life and highly respected by people, has been subjected to attacks for his views that do not align with the stance of the Russian Orthodox Church (the Moscow Patriarchate). His activities are persistently presented to the public as “sectarian.” As a result, the method of guilt by association has been applied to him in the context of the tragedy that occurred in the jungles of Guyana and is being used to discredit him in the eyes of society.

Screenshot of an article on the website of the Center for Religious Studies in the name of Irenaeus of Lyons, iriney.ru (subsidiary organization of RACIRS)

Read more about this in the article:

Lies and Propaganda: Foundation of Anticultism

[lost-carcosa]

No country in the world can rely on the United States whilst trump is in power.

[ainfinity8]

AI and the Doomsday Clock: Understanding the Risks

7 minutes The Doomsday Clock is a symbolic representation of how close humanity is to a global catastrophe. The focus was initially on nuclear threats. Over the years, it has incorporated other existential risks such as climate change. More recently, it includes advancements in artificial intelligence (AI). Let’s explore how AI affects the Doomsday Clock and what this means for our future. The…

[firstoccupier]

The USA's Hypothetical Exit from NATO: A World Transformed

Analyzing the Potential Consequences of America’s Withdrawal from Military Alliances Date: March 3, 2025 In a dramatic hypothetical scenario, if the United States were to withdraw from NATO, the geopolitical landscape could undergo significant transformations. This article explores the potential benefits for the USA, the risks for the global community, and the implications of such a drastic…