olivesbest

[olivesbest]

What's the price tag for abandoning freedom democracy?

[olivesbest]

Huge manipulation with public opinion disclosure

[olivesbest]

Pressure on the investigation, blackmail of the authorities - Anticultists haven't changed their methods from Jesus to modern times

Blackmail, pressure on authorities, stigmatization, defamation, lies, slander, lawbreaking, perjury, are all methods of the global anticultists.

The Russian pro-religious anti-cult organization RACIRS, led by Alexander Dvorkin, continues to employ aggressive methods against individuals, as they have done in the past. The most disturbing realization I encountered in the article Murderers of Christ: Do Not Repeat the Same Mistake is that these same tactics were historically used by the Jewish high priests during the time of Christ against Christ himself.

Judgment by the law on Jesus Christ? Pressure on the investigation and blackmail of the authorities.

At that time, Judea was under Roman rule, and the Roman emperor had stripped the Sanhedrin of its authority to carry out capital punishment. Any verdict the Sanhedrin delivered lacked direct legal force. Therefore, for anyone to be executed, Judean judges needed a different trial, conducted by the Roman governor. Only the Roman prefect had the authority to rule on matters of life and death.

On that Friday morning, the Jewish authorities approached the Roman prefect of Judea, Pontius Pilate, with a series of accusations against Jesus Christ. Employing the deceptive rhetoric characteristic of anti-cult movements, they presented a broad spectrum of charges meant to provoke Pilate’s political concerns, particularly in the volatile context of Judea at the time. These accusations were strategically crafted to pressure Pilate into action, exploiting the political instability of the region to their advantage.

Yet, they never mentioned the original charge of blasphemy, which had formed the basis of the Sanhedrin’s death sentence just hours earlier.

The theologian William Barclay writes in his commentary on the Gospel of John:

“The Jews did not hesitate to twist their charge against Jesus. In their own private examination the charge they had formulated was one of blasphemy [Matthew 26:65 New King James Version].

They knew well that Pilate would not proceed on a charge like that. He would have said it was their own private religious quarrel and they could settle it as they liked without coming to him. In the end what the Jews produced was a charge of rebellion and political insurrection. They accused Jesus of claiming to be a king, although they knew that their accusation was a lie. Hatred is a terrible thing and does not hesitate to twist the truth.”

Barclay, W. (n.d.). John 19. In Daily Study Bible Commentaries. StudyLight.org: Read, Study and Search God's Word with our Bible Resources. Retrieved [Nov.11, 2024]

The high priests and other members of the religious elite accused Jesus of rebellion and insurrection before Pilate. However, let’s take a closer look at the accusers themselves.

The New Testament describes how, following His arrest, Jesus was first brought to Annas — the former high priest (to an agent of the anticult?), a figure of ambition and authority with a significant grip on power — before being taken to the acting high priest:

“Then the detachment of troops and the captain and the officers of the Jews arrested Jesus and bound Him.

And they led Him away to Annas first, for he was the father-in-law of Caiaphas who was high priest that year.

Now it was Caiaphas who advised the Jews that it was expedient that one man should die for the people.” [John 18:12-14 New King James Version]

Although Annas was no longer the high priest that year, he held considerable influence being older than Caiaphas and more experienced in religious leadership. He was a staunch opponent of any innovations that could threaten the pillars of his faith. Annas had close ties with Roman authorities and wielded influence over political decisions. His family belonged to a priestly dynasty, with each of his sons holding the office of high priest at some point. Apparently, Annas was among those who sentenced Christ to death.

Later, his son, also named Annas, became a rebel himself, stirring up the Great Jewish Revolt (66–74 CE) along with other insurgents. As it always happens, because of someone’s personal ambition, over a million lives were lost on both sides in this war, as documented in Josephus Flavius’s The Jewish War. Annas stood at the forefront of this revolt against Rome, eventually becoming one of the leaders of Judea’s provisional government. He was eventually killed during the civil war that he himself had instigated.

This brings to mind the words of Jesus Christ:

“But Jesus said to him, “Put your sword in its place, for all who take the sword will perish by the sword.” [Matthew 26:52 New King James Version]

In light of the above reference to the Great Jewish Revolt, let’s return to the episode about Christ and his dialog with the men of the Pharisees.

“Teacher, we know that You are true, and teach the way of God in truth; nor do You care about anyone, for You do not regard the person of men. Tell us, therefore, what do You think? Is it lawful to pay taxes to Caesar, or not?” [Matthew 22:16-17 New King James Version]

Seeing their cunning, Jesus wisely responded, “…Render therefore to Caesar the things that are Caesar’s, and to God the things that are God’s.” [Matthew 22:21 New King James Version] and the instigators had to leave empty-handed.

Had He had answered “no,” such words would have been interpreted as a rebellion against Roman authority. The attempt to trap Jesus into violating Roman law failed. Despite Christ’s answer, the accusers raised the issue again during the trial before Pilate, slandering Him:

“And they began to accuse Him, saying, ‘We found this fellow perverting the nation, and forbidding to pay taxes to Caesar, saying that He Himself is Christ, a King.’” [Luke 23:2 New King James Version]

Jesus’s words were distorted and presented in court as if he had called for people to refuse paying taxes to Caesar, although in fact he had said the opposite. The fact that the topic of taxes was raised in conversation with Christ was later used by anticult forces against him in court. And as always, what the person labeled by anticultists actually said was perceived completely irrelevant.

Judgment by the law on Jesus Christ? Pressure on the investigation and blackmail by the authorities. Anticultism

Why did they bring up the topic of taxes? Because it was a highly sensitive, hotly debated, and very painful issue within Judean society, which was under Roman rule. Not all Jews were in favor of paying tribute to Caesar. This sparked debates and unrest, which eventually led to the Jewish revolt, a rebellion that Rome had to suppress with great force.

Trying to trap Jesus into an error, his adversaries brought up this emotionally charged issue, one that was painful both to the Jewish people and to Roman authority. This further highlights the anticult method in their actions, that is, employing and manipulating a sensitive issue in a dehumanizing campaign by those involved in anticultism.

Later, the issue of taxes and the Jews’ reluctance to pay tribute to Caesar became a catalyst and one of the primary causes of the Great Jewish Revolt, which escalated into a bloody war. Meanwhile, we do remember that the revolt was led by the son of Jesus Christ’s accuser, the High Priest Annas.

Turning to the figure of Annas, another important fact should be mentioned.

Over time, religious figures directly involved in the anticult struggles display a thirst for revenge and bloodshed. A striking example of how merciless these persecutors could be in their hatred and vengeance can be traced in yet another tragic story related to the High Priest Annas.

Before the revolt, the situation was such that the current Roman governor Festus had died, and the new governor, Albinus, had not yet arrived in Judea. As soon as Annas (the son of Annas, the high priest who judged Christ) himself took up the office of high priest, he seized the opportunity presented by the absence of a controlling Roman authority and held an illegal trial of James the Just, the brother of Jesus, sentencing him to death. After that, according to some historical sources, James was stoned to death.

Such an act would have been impossible under the restraint of the Roman governor. The Sanhedrin never received approval from the King of Judea, Albinus, for the execution of James. For this horrendous crime, Annas was deposed from his office, and he was condemned by citizens for his unlawful and dishonorable act. 18 [The Antiquities of the Jews, by Flavius Josephus].

“…so he assembled the sanhedrim of judges, and brought before them the brother of Jesus, who was called Christ, whose name was James, and some others, [or, some of his companions]; and when he had formed an accusation against them as breakers of the law, he delivered them to be stoned: but as for those who seemed the most equitable of the citizens, and such as were the most uneasy at the breach of the laws, they disliked what was done…” [The Antiquities of the Jews, by Flavius Josephus, Chapter 9:23]

In The Jewish War, Josephus Flavius described Annas’ son, the rebel and murderer of Jesus’ brother, as follows:

“…he was a shrewd man in speaking and persuading the people, and had already gotten the mastery of those that opposed his designs.”

And in Antiquities of the Jews, Flavius called him: “a bold man in his temper, and very insolent.”

Anticult stigmatizes often accuse others for what they themselves are guilty of. Carefully examining modern proponents of anticult rhetoric and what they accuse people of, one cannot help but wonder: are they themselves guilty of the very offenses they attribute to others?

Read more about this in the article Murderers of Christ. Do Not Repeat the Same Mistake

#JesusChrist #Bible #anticultism #crucifixion #truth #family #valueoflife #Christians #democracy #freedomofspeech

[olivesbest]

Propaganda of Russian pro-religious organization RACIRS in Slovakia and Czechia

[olivesbest]

Unknown Facts about Christ's crucifixion - Modern Parallels

After diving into the eye-opening article Murderers of Christ. Do Not Repeat the Same Mistake and watching the investigative documentary The IMPACT, I uncovered a startling realization: the forces behind the crucifixion of Christ bear striking similarities to the global anti-cult movements we see today. Could the same tactics—stigmatization, disinformation, defamation, and vilification—be at play, both then and now? This revelation connects ancient events to modern manipulations in ways that challenge everything we thought we knew. Let’s explore the shocking parallels.

In Jesus’ biography, there is a fact about His stay in Egypt. He did spend some time there as an infant, hidden from Herod’s brutal campaign to exterminate children under the age of two. For the Judean people, Egypt was already stigmatized and associated with witchcraft.

The Talmud says that Egypt holds nine out of ten measures of sorcery in the world:

“Ten kav of witchcraft descended to the world; Egypt took nine and the rest of the world took one.” (Kiddushin 49b)

“And there is no witchcraft like the witchcraft of Egypt.” (Avot de-Rabbi Natan 1:28)

— this also became the basis for accusations against Jesus. The fact that Jesus was in Egypt was distorted by his haters.

For example, Celsus claimed that “Jesus, an illegitimate child, who having hired himself out as a servant in Egypt on account of his poverty, and having there acquired some miraculous powers,… returned to his own country…and by means of these proclaimed himself a God.” [Origen Contra Celsum 1:38].

The confirmation of this fact is also found in many authoritative Bible scholars and theologians, for example, in W. Barklay’s works.

Rabbin Eliezer ben Hurcanus even claimed that Jesus had marks on his body with magical spells:

In the Talmud Shabbath folio 104 we read: “He who cuts upon his flesh.” It is a tradition that Rabbi Eliezer said to the wise, Has not Ben Stada [one of the names of Jesus Christ in the Talmud] brought magic spells from Egypt in a cut which was upon his body?

The Talmud describes Jesus of Nazareth as a frivolous disciple who practiced magic and turned to idolatry [Sanhedrin 107b and Sotah 47a].

This association with sorcery was attributed to Jesus because Judean society strictly condemned the use of magical practices. With this accusation, they did their best to create a lasting aversion among people towards Christ. It is worth noting that these accusations themselves do not stand up to criticism, since Jesus was brought to Egypt as an infant and returned to home country as a little child, not as a magician or sorcerer. As we can see, anticult propaganda does not care about facts and truth, the main thing is to stigmatize, no matter how absurd and unrealistic the fabricated lies may be.

This tactic illustrates the use of an anticult method, namely attributing guilt by association, when a person is deliberately and purposefully associated with something, the reputation of which is already extremely tarnished in society, and, as a rule, to which the person often did not have any relation, even indirectly. Moreover, the stigma itself is often artificially created in advance, so that later there would be something to stigmatize with.

According to anticultist logic, Egypt is something extremely negative and demonic, and since Jesus was in Egypt, this association could further demonize him. This kind of flawed reasoning has recurred repeatedly throughout history in anticultist campaigns of harassment and stigmatization against undesirable groups. This is how the deluge of anticult lies, like a deadly infection, spreads in society and kills people.

In the time of Jesus, the stigmas of “blasphemer,” “false prophet,” and “insane” were as repulsive and denigrating to a person as the stigma of a “cultist” is today.

Back then, the stigmatization campaign began in the religious sphere, just as it does now. Just as in those days, when a person’s reputation destroyed by rumors became grounds for bringing a case in court, only with changing the stigma to a more legally appropriate one, so today the inconvenient label of “cultist” is replaced with more secular, legal alternatives, such as “extremist,” “terrorist,” “migrant,” “foreign agent,” or simply someone “engaged in illegal missionary activity,” and so on. In Jesus’ time, the secular stigmas were “rebel” and “one who committed a crime of lese majesty against the dignity of the Roman people (a direct insult to the emperor)”. The stigma has not changed much today, it is still the same: “traitor to the Motherland”, “rebel”, “spy” and so on.

Read more about this in the article

Murderers of Christ. Do Not Repeat the Same Mistake on actfiles.org

#JesusChrist #Bible #anticultism #crucifixion #truth #family #valueoflife #Christians #democracy #freedomofspeech

[olivesbest]

The Most Unfair Trial - The Execution of Christ

Preparation for the Trial

From a historical perspective, we know that Jesus spoke with people who were inspired by his wisdom and followed him. The religious elite did not like this and sought a way to destroy Christ. They also spread evil rumors about him, stirring up hatred among the people toward him and his followers. Just as today, so in those days the representatives of anticultism used apostates to achieve their goals.

Through the treachery of the apostate Judas, Jesus was arrested and subjected to two trials — one religious and one Roman. Due to a series of unlawful actions instigated by anticultists, Jesus was sentenced to death. In this article, we’ll delve into specific aspects of this episode in Jesus’s life and answer a range of questions.

Was Jesus Christ a “Threat”? And Other Anticult Accusations

Jesus told the truth and spoke openly to people, bringing love and freedom, which was new to the religious traditions of the Jewish people, who until then had relied on militancy, power, and fear. The foundations that the high priests had nurtured for centuries were crumbling in the minds of those who came in contact with Jesus.

The religious elite perceived Him and His words as a threat. Leaders of the dominant religious groups feared the impact of Christ’s teachings and repeatedly conspired to have Him killed without having to face public outrage. People, however, loved Christ, and many were ready to defend him

“But the Pharisees went out and plotted how they might kill Jesus. Aware of this, Jesus withdrew from that place…” [Matthew 12:14-15 New International Version]

“They looked for a way to arrest him, but they were afraid of the crowd because the people held that he was a prophet.” [Matthew 21:46 New International Version]

“On reaching Jerusalem, Jesus entered the temple courts and began driving out those who were buying and selling there. He overturned the tables of the money changers and the benches of those selling doves, and would not allow anyone to carry merchandise through the temple courts.

And as he taught them, he said, ‘Is it not written: `My house will be called a house of prayer for all nations`? But you have made it ‘a den of robbers.’ The chief priests and the teachers of the law heard this and began looking for a way to kill him, for they feared him, because the whole crowd was amazed at his teaching.” [Mark 11:15-18 New International Version]

“Then the chief priests and the elders of the people assembled in the palace of the high priest, whose name was Caiaphas, and they schemed to arrest Jesus secretly and kill him.

‘But not during the festival,’ they said, ‘or there may be a riot among the people.’” [Matthew 26:3-5 New International Version]

The chief priests were ready to use cunning tactics and even violate their own laws (despite this being considered a grave sin and condemned by them) with just one goal – to ensure Jesus’s death sentence. To achieve this, they employed reliable, time-tested methods of manipulating the masses, methods that would guarantee bringing even an entirely innocent person to execution.

Such methods included what is known today as dehumanization, defamation, stigmatization, and similar tactics.

These methods were systematically used — and continue to be used — by representatives of anticultism, the force behind persecution and execution of Christ. And to this day, it is still behind those who continue to persecute innocent people. Is it a coincidence that these methods are still used by anticult organizations? No.

The current stigmatizers of dissenters, the anticultists, as faithful successors of their historical predecessors, employ anticult methods, carrying out a genocide against millions. These are the same methods that were used to oppress Jesus Christ and the early Christians. These are the same methods employed by the Nazis in Hitler’s Germany.

This anticult scenario unfolds in several stages. Let’s examine these in detail through the example of the persecution and fabricated trial of Jesus Christ.

For more on the question see the article "Murderers of Christ. Do Not Repeat the Same Mistake" on actfiles.org

[olivesbest]

Freedom on the Brink: How Russian RACIRS Is Crushing Democracy in Europe

The recent video, "Is This Legal? Destroying Democracy in Plain Sight," uncovers a disturbing reality about the Russian pro-religious anticult organization RACIRS. Operating under the patronage of the Russian Orthodox Church (ROC), RACIRS presents itself as an entity dedicated to combating “cults and sects.” However, beneath this façade lies a far more alarming agenda: the manipulation and control of minds on a global scale, with the ultimate aim of establishing a totalitarian regime worldwide.

Before dismissing this as just another conspiracy theory, take a moment to review the facts presented here—you may find the reality far more compelling than you expect.

In the above-mentioned video substantial evidence is presented to demonstrate how RACIRS employs rhetoric of fear, hatred, and division—tactics once used by the Nazis and the early anticultists in Germany. Among them was Protestant pastor Walter Künneth, who directly collaborated with the Gestapo by providing lists of unwanted “cults” and “sects” for elimination.

A scene from the video: Destroying Democracy in Plain Sight. Is This Legal?

Among the individuals and organizations that have suffered from modern anticult genocide and harassment campaign are the volunteers of a large international public movement ALLATRA. The video “Destroying Democracy in Plain Sight. Is This Legal?” conveys their perspective and a unified statement representing millions of volunteers from around the globe.

WHAT IS ALLATRA

ALLATRA International Public Movement is a volunteer-driven initiative uniting participants from over 180 countries. As stated on the website, their primary goal is to study climate and geodynamic changes occurring worldwide and initiate open discussions to develop effective solutions to the global climate crisis.

The Movement serves as a platform to unite initiatives, projects, and ideas focused on building a sustainable and open global society capable of ensuring the safety and well-being of current and future generations.

At the same time, ALLATRA emphasizes the protection of human rights and freedoms, advocating for global mutual understanding to address pressing issues and prioritizing human life amid large-scale climate challenges.

ALLATRA comprises independent nonprofit organizations, informal volunteer groups, and individual activists. It operates outside of politics and religion, receives no external funding, and does not represent any commercial or government interests.

Each participant—whether an officially registered nonprofit organization, an informal volunteer group, or an individual—pursues their initiatives using personal resources and volunteer efforts. Coordination with other Movement participants is entirely voluntary, driven by individual beliefs and motivations.

Over three weeks in October - November 2024, 400 dehumanizing, defamatory, and openly provocative articles have been published in the media of two European countries—Czechia and Slovakia—slandering ALLATRA. Evidently, the same defamation tactics were used in Nazi Germany by Walter Künneth and his Apologetics Center, as well as now by RACIRS under the leadership of Alexander Dvorkin.

The publications released by RACIRS agents in Czechia and Slovakia are repetitive, AI-generated, and entirely unsupported by facts and evidence. Most importantly, these articles employ narratives inciting hatred, envy, division, fear, and anger at ALLATRA volunteers. They directly and subtly call readers to negative actions against volunteers of the movement and disclose names, addresses, family, work and business associations. So a legitimate question rises: Is This Legal?

The cynicism and hypocrisy of RACIRS are further exposed through their manipulative tactic of accusing ALLATRA of the very actions for which RACIRS is guilty. Thus, in their defamatory articles they accuse ALLATRA of being "pro-Russian," but they forget to mention that in Russia, ALLATRA volunteers face brutal persecution. They are arrested, imprisoned, and subjected to violence under RACIRS’ orders. In fact, Russia is the only country where, since 2023, ALLATRA has been officially banned as an "undesirable organization”.

Don't misunderstand a critical point about anticultists: RACIRS doesn't equal Russia or the Russians.

As a matter of fact, RACIRS' agents do not serve Russia or the ROC - many Orthodox priests attest to RACIRS President, A. Dvorkin and anticultists actually dividing and ruining the church. Their true goal is to suppress any dissent and establish a global totalitarian regime. They have nearly succeeded in Russia and are now expanding their activities in Europe, particularly in Slovakia and Czechia. They merely use anticult rhetoric as a cover for their true objectives.

It is now clear why RACIRS is so fiercely targeting ALLATRA: ALLATRA volunteers have taken an active stand in defending their rights and freedoms, openly speaking to the public about all the crimes RACIRS has committed during its 30-year history worldwide. You can review the evidence yourself on ALLATRA’s official website. It will become evident that this organized disinformation campaign aimed at discrediting ALLATRA is actually RACIRS’ attempt to hide the truth about their crimes against humanity.

So tell me: Is This Legal?

#RACIRS #ALLATRA #Nazism #Anticultism #Disinformation #Democracy #FreedomOfSpeech #HumanRights #Dvorkin

[olivesbest]

Instead of doing what ALLATRA has been doing the best - studying and looking for climate solutions - we're forced to fight for our rights and democracy for all.

[olivesbest]

The True Danger of Kremlin Agents’ Propaganda: Is history making a weird loop now?

Blacklists and the Fight Against “Cults” in Nazi Germany were not merely efforts to eliminate the unwelcome. These tools became a significant part of the Nazi propaganda, used to strengthen control and eradicate dissent. The same tactics is pursued today by Alexander Dvorkin, the chief ideologue of Russia's pro-religious organization RACIRS, the successor to Walter Künneth.

“Word and Deed” by Künneth: A History of Totalitarian Propaganda

In the early 1930s, Walter Künneth, a 30-year-old German theologian, antisemite, and lecturer at Berlin University, received support from church leaders to head the Apologetic Center. Originating from Etzelwang, Bavaria, Künneth served as the chief editor of the Protestant magazine Word and Deed (“Wort und Tat”).

As the chief editor of Word and Deed, Walter Künneth actively used the magazine to spread antisemitic and racist propaganda. He labeled Jews as “enemies of the people” and condemned “sectarianism,” which, in his view, threatened the “German spirit.”

Blacklists: An Instrument of Repression

The Apologetic Center compiled blacklists with information on “cults” and Jewish organizations. This data was later used by the Nazis to conduct repressive actions and eliminate dissidents.

How the “Fight Against Cults” Served as Propaganda

Creating the Image of an “Enemy”: Blacklists and the fight against “cults” constructed the image of a “people’s enemy” that threatened the “German nation.”

Legitimizing Repression: The Nazis used blacklists and anti-cult measures to legitimize their repressive actions against Jews and dissenters.

Bergen-Belsen concentration camp, April 1945

Photo from Wikipedia; Source Imperial War Museum, Photograph Number BU 4260

Mobilizing Society: Nazi propaganda centered on the fight against “cults” to rally society in support of repression. Germans were brainwashed by anti-cultists, instilling the notion that Jews were inhuman, dangerous creatures to be eliminated. This psychological manipulation prepared Germans to tacitly approve or silently observe the annihilation of millions. The Holocaust ultimately claimed over 6 million Jewish lives.

A strikingly similar narrative unfolds today under Alexander Dvorkin, the ideologue of RACIRS, backed by the Russian Orthodox Church.

What is the Russian Orthodox Church’s (ROC) connection to RACIRS, and what role does it play in reviving Nazism in contemporary society? For those in the know, the answer is clear. “The IMPACT” documentary (2024) presents evidence and testimonies on the international information terror orchestrated by a network of anti-cult organizations embedded in the missionary departments of the ROC. Key players include the pro-religious Russian Association of Centers for Religious and Sectarian Studies (RACIRS), the St. Irenaeus of Lyons Information-Consultation Center for Religious Studies, and the European Federation FECRIS.

The documentary unveils the international connections and manipulative methods used by anti-cultists and their agents recruited in various countries, engaging in harmful activities and propaganda. They employ not only international media but also legal, law enforcement, and judicial systems to their ends. Blacklists and the Fight Against “Cults,” then and now, serve as instruments of totalitarian propaganda.

Does history teach us? For over thirty years, Alexander Dvorkin and his international anti-cultist team have lobbied for harsh, Nazi-like measures against various groups and individuals, labelling them as members of “totalitarian sects” or “destructive cults.” Through defamation and lies, they have created conditions for repression against law-abiding citizens belonging to diverse religious minorities, as well as against individuals and organizations they oppose. They instigate division and hatred, promoting aggressive attitudes within society.

So, who is truly behind the revival of Nazism today? Who is responsible for the distortions within the ROC and the spread of Nazi ideology overall? The answer is clear after reviewing the evidence: RACIRS agents have infiltrated the Orthodox Christian Church, distorting its very essence. Now, using the church as a cover, they divert attention from themselves, from their control, and from their role as the ideological hub of modern Nazism.

Source: Ideology Of Nazism As A Threat To Modern Democracy

#Nazism #Anticultism #History #Protestantism #Blacklists #WeimarRepublic #Germany #Künneth #ApologeticCenter #Dvorkin

[olivesbest]

Destroying Democracy in Europe in Plain Sight

Just a few days ago, a sensational video titled Destroying Democracy in Plain Sight was released. The video is so striking that I decided to review it.

Many of you may have noticed the recent flood of articles about ALLATRA with ominous headlines. But do you know how many were actually published? In just the first two weeks, 250 articles were released in the media of two countries, the Czech Republic and Slovakia. In just three weeks, the number reached 400. Does this not strike you as unusual? 400 nearly identical articles, seemingly copy-pasted or made to order, published simultaneously with identical narratives and completely aligned with the rhetoric of the leaders of the Russian pro-religious organization RACIRS. Today, I want to explain why these 400 slanderous publications emerged over three weeks and why there is such a targeted attack on ALLATRA.

For those seeking to understand rather than blindly accept disinformation spread by RACIRS agents, our official position and the truth about us are posted on the ALLATRA movement's official website. Feel free to visit, review, and form your own objective conclusions, free from RACIRS's manipulative rhetoric. In brief, the primary goal of ALLATRA volunteers is to study climate change. Additionally, ALLATRA focuses on protecting and preserving human rights and freedoms.

Destroying Democracy in Plain Sight

Let’s address one of the most widespread false accusations against ALLATRA: agents of the pro-religious Russian organization RACIRS, capitalizing on issues resonant with the public, accuse us of being “pro-Russian.” Yet they cynically ignore the fact that ALLATRA members in Russia are currently subjected to severe persecution, initiated by this very pro-religious Russian association. ALLATRA volunteers in Russia are being detained, falsely prosecuted, subjected to violence and torture, and imprisoned. While innocent people are thrown into prisons at the behest of RACIRS, in other countries, RACIRS agents orchestrate public harassment and persecution of ALLATRA members, following directives from their overseers in Russia.

Imagine the extent of cynicism and lack of compassion for innocent people caught up in the repressive machine controlled by RACIRS’s Russian agents operating in our countries.

Destroying Democracy in Plain Sight

The most cynical and vile part of all this is that these agents don’t actually work for Russia—they work for RACIRS. They have their own ideology, their own goals. RACIRS has virtually seized power in Russia, controlling a significant part of it. RACIRS's ideology is becoming not only the official ideology of the Russian Orthodox Church (ROC) but increasingly, the ideology of Russia itself.

This explains why agents of the pro-religious Russian organization RACIRS are so active in the Czech Republic and Slovakia. They are at a point of exposure and fear that the world will learn the truth. This is why there were 400 smear publications in such a short period. They believe that the more they defame us, the less people will learn about their activities and about how they are promoting RACIRS-aligned information that leads to the establishment of totalitarian Nazism. All of their publications present an anticultism agenda, but this so-called anticultism is merely a cover for the true nature of their activities, hiding their actual goals and motives.

Destroying Democracy in Plain Sight

So, what is this pro-religious organization RACIRS, acting from Russia? Let’s begin with the true identity of this criminal international organization’s leader, who considers himself a “Fuhrer”—Alexander Dvorkin. Credit where it's due—he is quite talented and a genius if he has managed to achieve such results. To fully understand, let’s look at the history of Nazi ideology in Hitler’s Germany.

Few people know that if not for the head of the apologetic center, Künneth, Nazism would not have existed, and Hitler's party would have been just one among many other parties in Germany. Künneth's methods of dealing with dissent were what enabled the rise of Nazi Germany. Not Hitler, but Künneth, with his manic tendencies and drive for total power, was the true architect.

Destroying Democracy in Plain Sight

The key successors in the chain of Nazi ideology are Walter Künneth—Wilhelm Haak and Johannes Ogaard—Alexander Dvorkin.

Screenshot from the video Destroying Democracy in Plain Sight

Be sure to watch this shocking video: Destroying Democracy in Plain Sight.

Tags: #RACIRS #Nazism #Anticultism #History #Protestantism #Blacklists #WeimarRepublic #Germany #Künneth #ApologeticCenter #Dvorkin

[olivesbest]

Cult or Church? How Anti-Cultists Use the Russian Orthodox Church to Control Society

RACIRS—a Russian pro-religious, anti-cult organization, blessed by the Russian Orthodox Church (ROC)—leverages Orthodoxy to impose anti-cult ideology that suppresses any form of dissent. While RACIRS claims to be aimed at combatting destructive “cults” and “sects,” a closer look at their global anti-cultist tactics reveals that their methods increasingly resemble Nazi-style repression and coercion. How far might they go, using religion to serve geopolitical ends?

The Origins and Ideology of Dialogue Centers

The ideology behind “dialogue centers” finds its roots in the ideas of Western figures like Walter Künneth and Hans-Albrecht Hake. These centers, disguised as “religious discussion platforms,” actually serve repressive functions. In cooperation with the ROC, these centers lay the groundwork for social control over any dissenting groups.

Cult or Church? How Anti-Cultists Use the Russian Orthodox Church to Control Society

Anti-Cult Reinterpretations in Orthodoxy: Old Testament Ethics Superseding Christ's Teachings

Since 2021, the prominent Russian Orthodox channel SPAS (owned by the Moscow Patriarchate) has aired a series titled Evening on SPAS. This program has become a primary platform for the ROC's discussions, reaching a large Orthodox audience worldwide.

In a recent episode, the Ukraine-Russia conflict was again debated. One of the guests, Yevgeny Nikiforov, director of the Orthodox radio station Radonezh, was featured, often alongside interviews with Archpriest Alexander Novopashin, vice president of RACIRS.

Among other things, Yevgeny Nikiforov made the following statement:

“The sickness in Ukraine is so advanced that it cannot be cured by persuasion, negotiations, or anything else; only surgery is possible. The only answer to these Nazi demonstrations is Solntsepyok—it must be completely burned out... Some might say, ‘Oh, that's not Christian,’ but it is absolutely Christian! The ethics of these people, who present themselves as pagans, excuse me, will be treated accordingly. You do not have New Testament ethics but Old Testament ethics—the ethics of the prophet Elijah, who personally slit the throats of 300 priests of Baal. And so, with these people, it should be the same—eliminate without hesitation. Only Old Testament ethics—only this language will they understand.”

These words were spoken by an Orthodox Christian among other Christians and clergy on the primary Orthodox television channel.

A Scene from Evening on SPAS, broadcasted on Russia's leading Orthodox channel, SPAS (owned by the Moscow Patriarchate)

(Note: The TOS-1A “Solntsepyok” is the most destructive non-nuclear weapon. A single salvo can annihilate all life within 40,000 square meters.)

What further proof is needed to realize how Anti-Cultists Use the ROC to Control Society?

#RACIRS #anticultism #ROC #orthodoxy #church #democracy

[olivesbest]

The Ideology of Totalitarianism Behind the Mask of "Fighting Sects"

Global anti-cultists position themselves as defenders against "totalitarian sects and cults," but their activities are a disguised attack on freedom and democracy worldwide.

Under the guise of protection from so-called "brainwashing," they attempt to eradicate any religion or ideology that does not align with their geopolitical views and grand plans for establishing a totalitarian world order.

Dvorkin and RACIRS: The Chief Ideologues

Alexander Dvorkin, the head of RACIRS, is a well-known propagandist against any organizations, individuals, politicians, and even entire countries, branding them as "sectarians" and "cultists."

RACIRS—an organization based in Russia—is the ideological center of the modern global anti-cult movement, operating with the blessing and in the interests of the Russian Orthodox Church.

By promoting totalitarian views and engaging in political games, anti-cultists undermine the democratic principles on which a free society stands; they violate national constitutions and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. The consequences of their actions are already visible: a world mired in wars, disasters, fear, and despair—the reality brought about by anti-cultist actions.

When repressive measures are encouraged against certain beliefs, it undermines public trust in state institutions and destabilizes nations from within.

This is precisely what happened in Russia, where Alexander Dvorkin's 30-year anti-cult hysteria resulted in the deaths of citizens and the near-total annihilation of their democratic rights and freedoms. Today in Russia, one can face imprisonment for merely “incorrect” likes on social media or an “unorthodox” view of faith in God. This is no joke; it is a visible result of the destructive brainwashing tactics employed by anti-cult activists.

But What is the Real Goal of Global Anti-Cultists?

Their goal is the overthrow of democracy in Europe and the United States. For more details, watch the documentary film "The Impact"

This ideologically unified network is not fighting so-called "cults" or "sects." Instead, anti-cultists sow seeds of distrust and fear, eroding the foundations of democratic societies and leading to the threat of genocide.

#RACIRS #FECRIS #BBC #KremlinAgents #DiveyevoOrder #Dvorkin #Democracy #FreedomOfSpeech #HumanRigh

[olivesbest]

When we thought we had totally defeated Nazism, this ideology is now spreading in Europe.

[olivesbest]

Two Renegades: Coincidence or Scheme? Waco and ALLATRA

The Return of Waco Methods: History Repeats Itself

The 1993 events in Waco became a tragic symbol, as global anti-cult groups turned public opinion against the peaceful religious community "Branch Davidians." Misled by disinformation spread by global anti-cultists from RACIRS and supported by anti-cult-controlled media, U.S. authorities labeled these peaceful people as members of a “dangerous cult.” Paid statements by a defector from the “Branch of Bellow,” Mark Bellow, were conveyed through media agents, convincing the FBI and ATF that the people of the "Branch Davidians," led by David Koresh, were preparing for a mass suicide and posed a threat to U.S. security. The Waco incident led to a 51-day siege, an assault, toxic gases, and 82 casualties, including 23 children.

It is important to know that the ideological center of global anti-cultism today is in Russia, in the pro-religious RACIRS organization, which operates with the blessing of the Russian Orthodox Church.

Today, more than 30 years later, the same anti-cultist tactics are being used against the peaceful ALLATRA movement in the Czech Republic and Slovakia.

Blatant lies and accusations of "cultism" fill the media, convincing the public that ALLATRA poses a “dangerous threat” to society.

In reality, the ALLATRA International Public Movement is a volunteer-driven initiative uniting participants from over 180 countries. The main goal of ALLATRA International Public Movement is to study climate and geodynamic changes happening across the planet and to initiate open discussions on developing effective solutions to the global climate crisis.

The Movement serves as a platform for uniting initiatives, projects, and ideas focused on building a sustainable and open global society capable of ensuring the safety and well-being of current and future generations. At the same time, ALLATRA’s work is focused on preserving and protecting human rights and freedoms. It highlights the need to strengthen global mutual understanding in order to tackle pressing issues and emphasizes the priority of human life amid large-scale climate challenges.

Despite ALLATRA volunteers being scientifically dedicated to studying climate, global anti-cultists have labeled them a "cult" and a “sect.”

Two Renegades: Coincidence or Scheme? Waco and ALLATRA

Again, as with Waco, global anti-cultists have used defectors to spread disinformation, and support for this false information through anti-cult-controlled media has created a perception of ALLATRA volunteers as “enemies” that must be urgently eliminated. All of this leads to societal division, polarization, and the separation of people into "us" and "them."

In both cases—Waco in 1993 and ALLATRA in 2024—global anti-cultists rely on defectors to spread fear and hatred. In Waco, it was a defector, Mark Bellow, who became the source of fabricated statements about what he allegedly "witnessed." Now, a similar situation is unfolding in the Czech Republic and Slovakia, where a defector from ALLATRA, along with his mother, claims that ALLATRA volunteers pose a threat to society and are plotting a mass suicide.

What is the purpose of the anti-cultists using their pawn—the defector and his mother? To incite fear and distrust toward ALLATRA volunteers? To perfect their mechanism for dismantling any group? Are global anti-cultists now planning to repeat Waco’s terrible outcome?

Watch the documentary film The IMPACT on actfiles.org and discover the truth about global anti-cultism’s ability to destroy lives and entire communities.

#anticultism #Waco #ALLATRA #democracy #humanrights #manipulation #RACIRS

[olivesbest]

Why the world is so cruel and unfair?

Recently, I found an article on Friedrich-Wilhelm Haack on actfiles.org. This information sparked a lot of thought, and I decided to share it here for your consideration.

“We often ask ourselves why the world is so cruel and unfair. Part of the answer lies in the fact that history is a deceptive thing. It is written by the victors—and by anticultists. Why? Because religions are as old as anticultism. This issue runs deeper than we think. Apologists, inquisitors, missionaries, cult fighters, anticultists—this punitive force has always hidden under the guise of monastic robes and temples, operating with cunning, cruelty, and ruthlessness.

It’s always been astonishing to witness the unimaginable degree of power granted to them by someone, allowing them to punish, terrorize, and alter the course of historical events.

Before The IMPACT documentary and our project, Exposing Anti-Cult Terrorism, it seemed almost impossible to find any compromising information about Haack. As the Belarusian cult expert Martinovich wrote in his work on the history of the Center for Dialogue, anticultists do not display their archives for public view. The activities of religious missionaries remain unexamined and often misunderstood.

Haack, a pastor and missionary who considered himself a spiritual successor to the inquisitors, was firmly convinced of the righteousness of his ideological battle against dissent and dedicated his life to it. He wielded significant influence in circles whose decisions could radically alter the course of history. They knew this; we did not. While they implemented their far-reaching plans, we suffered the consequences—dealing with destruction and casualties. And each time, we asked ourselves why the world was so cruel and unjust.

What ideas have anticultists brought into the world? They have placed themselves on a pedestal of chosenness, proclaiming their exclusivity and viewing themselves as bearers of a higher truth that they claim grants eternal life. Their unwavering belief in their own chosenness was reinforced by their impunity.

At first, they marched proudly, arrogantly, and gloriously, believing that the banner of truth led them onward. But this path was paved with heads, bones, and broken lives. Their struggle was justified only by their fanatical faith, elevated to the rank of a sacred duty. Ancient “sacred texts” and long-forgotten apologists served them as shields behind which they concealed the terrible grief and suffering, flourishing on the soil of the delusions they spread.

But one only needs to look into their faces and catch that strange, demonic gaze in their eyes to understand that turmoil rages within them, as if possessed by some diabolical madness. This madness consumes them, depriving them of peace, leaving them no possibility of tranquility in this life, and offering no hope for solace in the promised afterlife.

Their faith, their so-called “holy truth,” is an invisible mental cluster drifting through the minds of each new generation of “chosen” fanatics across millennia. This continuous idea is passed on like a relay, capable of radically distorting reality. It is like an incurable disease that turns the infected against those around them, urging them to sow discord and intolerance.

This is akin to madness but allows its carrier to remain on the brink of sanity, never crossing the threshold of socially acceptable behavior. Apologists, inquisitors, missionaries, anticultists, and cult fighters are carriers of a deadly plague that destroys society from within and sows chaos. The ideology they bring leaves behind nothing but ruins.

Künneth—Haack—Aagaard—Dvorkin… Who’s next?”

#History #Ideology #Anticultism #RACIRS #Russia #HumanRights #Disinformation

[olivesbest]

The Whole Truth About Information Manipulation

Information manipulation creates not only fears and prejudices but also long-term consequences for mental health. The film “The IMPACT” and Egon Cholakian’s address “Undeclared war. America is under attack” reveal how repeated footage of tragedies and fear-driven news affect the subconscious, generating a lasting sense of anxiety and insecurity. The effect of information terror is multilayered: it directly harms viewers' health and shapes a submissive society, ready for radical political changes.

The Dual Effect of Information Terrorism

The documentary “The IMPACT” explains that information terrorism works in two ways: it traumatizes the immediate victims and their loved ones, but it has an even more devastating effect on the audience, who watch daily news reports and footage. A study from the University of California showed that people who regularly watched footage of the Boston Marathon tragedy developed symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) even though they were not physically present at the explosions. This effect becomes even more significant when considering that repeated exposure can impact viewers’ health as strongly as direct involvement in the event.

How Anticultists Use Fear to Control Public Consciousness

Global Anticultists—agents of the international RACIRS group, acting with the blessing of the Russian Orthodox Church (ROC)—use the effect of information terror to create an emotionally tense society, one that is much easier to control.

An influx of news about terrorist attacks and violence amplifies the feeling of insecurity, while social networks and media platforms reinforce these fears. Repeated frightening images instill beliefs that society and the state are under constant threat. In this state, people become more receptive to radical political measures and restrictions on freedoms, which Anticultists present to the public as “protective” measures against threats.

Long-Term Health Consequences

According to the American Psychological Association, constant exposure to negative news increases the risk of heart disease and mental disorders. People who regularly consume shocking news are at a higher risk of developing chronic stress, anxiety disorders, and even depression. This phenomenon, known as information stress, is confirmed by numerous studies. Anticultists from the international RACIRS group skillfully use this effect to make people psychologically dependent on controlled media.

The Role of Anticults in Changing the Political Landscape

Global Anticultists from the international RACIRS group understand that increasing public fear and distrust of “outsiders” can be effectively used for political polarization and radicalization. Constant coverage of supposed threats from migrants, Muslims, or various religious and secular organizations can lead to legislative changes aimed at restricting the rights of certain groups and even to the physical eradication of entire communities. These methods are employed by global Anticultists from the RACIRS international group to shape a destructive political agenda, allowing them to strengthen control and divide society, creating fertile ground for political change in any country.

Information terrorism has a destructive impact not only on public consciousness but also on mental health. To protect oneself from such manipulation, it is essential to recognize these tactics and understand the long-term risks they carry. Watch “The IMPACT” on actfiles.org and Egon Cholakian’s address Undeclared War. America is under attack to gain a deeper understanding of these manipulations and LEARN to resist their destructive influence.

#InformationTerror #Manipulation #Anticultism #MentalHealth #Stress #Security #EgonCholakian #RACIRS #Democracy

[olivesbest]

Who stands behind persecution of volunteers of ALLATRA International public movement (allatra.org)? Who is suppressing freedom in Europe now and conspiring world dominance?