olivesbest

[olivesbest]

Who is Pushing America to the Brink of Civil War?

School shootings, assassination attempts on politicians and business people often involve individuals from quite stable backgrounds, transformed by disinformation and subconscious manipulation. Practically all of such cases can be traced back to the dangerous influence of anti-cultist tactics, which aim to polarize society through fear and distrust.

As seen in Ukraine, where anti-cultists fueled division and conflict, America could face a similar fate by 2028. With growing polarization, reduced trust in institutions, and pervasive anxiety, the groundwork for civil unrest is being laid. To stop this, we must expose anti-cultist tactics, counter disinformation, and protect society from manipulation.

Today trust in the government and public institutions in the US is at an all-time low, while uncertainty and anxiety are growing. Manipulation over our consciousness and subconsciousness is only increasing, which serves a fertile ground for disinformation.

If it is capable of turning an individual into a murderer, then, under the constant massive impact we are now facing from anticultists, we have a lot to worry about. Analyzing numerous cases of info terror attacks through the media and other subtle elements of mass culture, we arrive at a conclusion that they want to make murderers of us all. The goal of those misanthropic terrorists is to unleash a civil war through information attacks and manipulations aimed at polarizing our society.

We see how the confrontation among citizens on political, social and religious grounds is increasing. We are constantly being divided into camps in order to pit us against each other. Bombardment with destructive narratives from anticultists, spread by their collaborationists in our media, could soon bring us to a civil war! Do you doubt this is realistic?

Recall that 11 years ago the Ukrainians and Russians couldn’t even imagine that they would start killing each other in a fratricidal war. Yet, it’s been three years since this bloody war, unleashed and cynically planned by anti-cultists, has claimed the lives of hundreds of thousands of people. By the way, this situation has also been described in detail in “The IMPACT” documentary.

Unless action is taken, the USA could be drawn into civil war by 2028, if not sooner. This is not an exaggeration, but quite a real threat that requires an immediate response.

It is necessary to act now. We must protect ourselves from disinformation and informational terror attacks in the media aimed at manipulating our consciousness.

We must take preventive measures and adopt legislative decisions that limit such influence. It is important to tell the whole world about the destructive activities of anti-cultists, to expose them, and to bring them to justice through an international tribunal.

The future of America, and therefore the world, depends on our actions today. If we do not confront the terrorist organization of anti-cultists, our fate will be extremely tragic. For this very reason, we urge everyone to share this information, unite in the fight against the anticultist movements, and protect our society from the devastating effects of disinformation. Otherwise, shootings of our children in schools will never stop.

Read more about this in the article:

“America is in Decline”: Truth or Informational Indoctrination? A reality or an information warfare?

[olivesbest]

USA in 2025 forecast

[olivesbest]

The Fourth Reich: Who Continues Hitler’s Legacy today?

One of Alexander Dvorkin's - President of Russian RACIRS - key influences was his collaboration with Friedrich Wilhelm Haack, Johannes Aagaard, and their associate Pastor Gandow. These figures, known for their aggressive anti-cult activities, passed down methodologies rooted in ideological suppression and manipulation. Dvorkin embraced these tactics, adapting them into a systematic model for targeting dissenting groups. Alarmingly, this framework mirrors the trajectory of Protestantism's entanglement with Nazism in Germany, as Russian Orthodox Christianity appears to replicate these historical patterns under Dvorkin's direction.

Although Hitler was greatly influenced by religious figures, who later adopted radical views and became fierce fighters against the dissent, i.e., anticultists in modern terms, it’s important to note that the influence comes not from the religions or their doctrines themselves, but from the individual figures with their radical views within the religious structure.

The Apologetics Center

In 1921, the Protestant church established the Apologetics Center (“Apologetische Centrale”), a predecessor to the modern anticult organizations. Officially, this Center was supposed to monitor the activities of other religious movements and inform the Protestant church community about them, albeit the Apologetics Center began collecting data on various sects, movements, circles, and other associations.

Walter Künneth was a German Protestant theologian

In 1932, Pastor Walter Künneth, an anti-Semite from Bavaria and editor-in-chief of the Protestant publication “Word and Deed” (“Wort und Tat”), became the head of the Apologetics Center. Anticult activity began, i.e., the fight against non-Christian movements, such as anthroposophy, Darwinism, monism, spiritualism, occultism, and others, that the Protestant Church viewed as competitors. Lectures, training, and articles were written on this subject. The ideas and methods were primarily inherited from the Inquisition.

On April 26, 1933, Walter Künneth’s report “The Church and the Jewish Question” („Die Kirche vor der Judenfrage in Deutschland“) was presented to the Federal Church Office in Berlin. In it, he called for the elimination of Jewry, which he described as a foreign cell in the body of Germany; this report was the most influential in final approval of the anti-Semitism policies.

On December 16, 1933, the Gestapo (“Geheime Staatspolizei” – the official secret police of Nazi Germany) noticed and appreciated the work and methods of the Apologetics Center. Thus, Künneth was aligned with Adolf Hitler in the effort to eradicate Jewish influence. At the same time, Künneth sought to eliminate other religious and political minorities. He expressed satisfaction with the Gestapo’s interest in his work, and wrote in the report to the Reich Church government:

“The Gestapo expressed great interest in the Apologetics Center’s archive of sects and in our work against free thought, Marxism, and Bolshevism. The Gestapo expressed a desire to lead the fight against illegal free thought in the future, together with the Apologetics Center. The exchange of materials between the Gestapo and the Apologetics Center has already begun.”

From this point on, the Apologetics Center began to supply the Imperial Ministry of the Interior, the Ministry of Propaganda, and the Gestapo with materials on the political positions of the various religious communities.

The Apologetics Center also collaborated with the Reich Ministry of Propaganda, which was under Joseph Goebbels’ direction, and the Reich Ministry of the Interior. This work centered around the development of materials against Jews and sects. The lists of so-called sects, i.e., any associations that the Apologetics Center considered dangerous to the ideology of the state, were formed and continued to expand.

Information from the German online magazine “DER THEOLOGE”

Thus, the representatives of the Apologetics Center, led by Walter Künneth, made many slanderous pseudo-expert conclusions. As a result of these slanders, all such associations, as well as the Jews, were targeted by the Nazi dictatorship and later brutally persecuted, which included sending members of these associations to concentration camps.

Historian Horst Junginger writes: “Whereas in 1931, there were about 150 religious and non-religious ideological communities on which they had collected data, and two years later – about 250, in 1936, there were about 500 groups and sects considered ‘dangerous,’ according to the archival lists.”

Information from the German online magazine “DER THEOLOGE”

It is also important to note that the brutality of the methods demonstrated by the Gestapo during World War II, was adopted from the anticult organizations, in particular, from the Apologetics Center, which was organized by a radicalized part of the Protestant Church. The radical views of the church and, later, the Apologetics Center were formed long before the radical views of even Adolf Hitler himself.

Thus, researchers note that Hitler “followed Luther’s exact instructions against the Jews.” Historians emphasize the fact that it was church anti-Semitism that determined the nature of German national movements, that is, Nazism itself. So, the radical vector against Jews and dissenters was determined long before the Gestapo emerged. Interestingly, in 1933, immediately after its establishment, the Gestapo began to adopt practices and exchange documentation specifically with the anti-cult Apologetics Center. Protestant pastors, who held radical views, constantly urged the Gestapo itself to toughen its methods against Jews and dissenters. In 1942, for example, the Bavarian Evangelical Lutheran pastor Friedrich Auer even demanded from the Nazi government a new “Bartholomew’s Night,” during which none of the surviving Jews would be spared. Note, however, that these religious leaders were not prosecuted for their Nazi calls, even after the war.

Although Hitler's regime was dismantled, the ideologies that fueled Nazism persisted, and the architects of his rise to power evaded justice. Today, similar patterns are evident in Russia through the activities of the Russian Association of Centers for the Study of Religions and Cults (RACIRS). This organization employs methods strikingly reminiscent of those used to propagate totalitarian control in Nazi Germany. A deeper exploration of knowledge transfer and the continuance of global anti-cultism reveals unsettling parallels in the modern era.

Read more about this in the article:

The Fourth Reich: Who Continues Hitler’s Legacy?

[olivesbest]

Siberian Plum: What do you need to know to survive

[olivesbest]

From Moscow to Beijing to Washington: How Alexander Dvorkin's Global Anticult Operates

Significant evidence indicates the presence of a centralized international anticult network under the leadership of Alexander Dvorkin, characterized by coordinated strategies, shared methodologies, and a unified agenda across multiple countries.

Despite claims of independence from some European and British anticultists, substantial evidence reveals their connections to the Russian organization RACIRS and its leader, Alexander Dvorkin. These ties are demonstrated through covert interactions, identical methodologies, mutual endorsements, and joint participation in events. Their actions, marked by consistent rhetoric, anti-Semitic undertones, and aggressive hate propaganda, suggest a coordinated strategy rooted in Nazi ideologies linked to figures like Walter Künnet and Friedrich Wilhelm Haack. This points to a centralized RACIRS network operating under Dvorkin's directive.

Besides, here are a number of references to Chinese activists involved in the American ICSA anticult work: Zengyi Zhang, PhD; Jiquan Zhou; Juan Zhou; Bairong Wang; Dr. Weiguo Wang; Yichen Wang; Min Wu; Frank Tian Xie, PhD; Guanghui Xu; Peng Xue; Qingping Chen, PhD; Tianjia Chen, PhD; Dr. Jianhui Li; Dr. Yaming Li; Yao Liu.

Screenshots from ICSA web archive

It is noteworthy that ICSA is a member of FECRIS, the European umbrella federation which includes dozens of anticult organizations from various countries. Alexander Dvorkin (president of the Russian association RACIRS) became FECRIS vice-president in 2009, and the election of FECRIS’ new leadership was held in St. Petersburg, Russia. FECRIS membership involved and still involves many RACIRS members, including hierarchs of the Russian Orthodox Church. Dvorkin’s vice-presidency in FECRIS lasted until 2021, after which he remained on the FECRIS board of directors along with other European anticultists.

ICSA and its ties to post-communist governments. Source of repressive methods against Falun Gong

ICSA has been accused of having ties to post-communist governments. As you remember, its membership included anticultists associated with the Russian pro-religious organization RACIRS (whose president is A. Dvorkin) and the European FECRIS (where A. Dvorkin is on the board of directors). Among ICSA members we would like to mention a Russian citizen Evgeny Volkov, a translator of Steven Hassan’s books into Russian, who, along with Dvorkin, often delivered speeches at conferences organized by both RACIRS and FECRIS. Together with another ICSA member, Ukrainian citizen Vladimir Petukhov, Evgeny Volkov served as a leader of the Ukrainian anticult movement for a long time, particularly in the organization “Family and Personality Protection Society.” Both Volkov and Petukhov were corresponding members of FECRIS and spoke at its conferences.

It’s important to note that all regional branches of Ukrainian anticult centers, along with the All-Ukrainian Dialogue Center for Victims of Destructive Cults which united them, were part of the East European Dialogue Center almost from their inception and throughout their entire existence. They were fully subordinated to Alexander Dvorkin. Read more about this cooperation and its dire consequences for the Ukrainian people in the article, “Europe, Open Your Eyes if You Don’t Want War.”

Overall, these connections are quite revealing in the context of information that will follow, in terms of suppression of religious freedom and numerous anti-democratic processes.

As for other examples of ties to post-communist governments, ICSA’s influence has crossed not only moral boundaries in suppressing religious freedom, but also territorial and national ones. This organization has contributed to brutal persecution of representatives of other nations, particularly the followers of Falun Gong movement in China where many innocent people have suffered torture and organ harvesting. For members of the multimillion organization Falun Gong, these horrors began more than 25 years ago and continue to this day.

The influence of the American ICSA on suppression of religious freedom in China is evidenced by specific facts. In the Journal of Church and State, in an article titled “Imposed Limitations on Freedom of Religion in China and the Margin of Appreciation Doctrine: A Legal Analysis of the Crackdown on the Falun Gong and other ‘Evil Cults’,” Bryan Edelman and James T. Richardson argued that China has borrowed these ideas mainly from Western anticult movements such as ICSA, which has reinforced views of non-traditional religious groups in China, known as “xie jiao,” and provided support for oppressing them and carrying out repression against them.

Read more about this in the article: Centralized International Anticult Network of Agents Led by Alexander Dvorkin

[olivesbest]

How Negative News Impacts Our Health?

Prolonged and repeated exposure to media coverage of traumatic events can transform acute stress into chronic stress, with significant physical and mental health impacts. Research following the September 11 attacks revealed that individuals who consumed extensive TV coverage during the first week experienced heightened post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms for up to three years. This underscores how continuous exposure to distressing media content can extend the adverse effects far beyond those directly impacted. The study emphasizes the need for responsible media practices to mitigate these widespread psychological repercussions.

The study concludes with a call for responsibility and prudence:

“Most importantly, the media should recognize that the constant display of horrific, anxiety-inducing images is not of the public interest. Repeated depiction of such images helps to maintain potentially traumatic experiences and suffering associated with a traumatic event. To limit potential harm, viewers should be warned when these images will be shown. Although we are not the first to suggest that media sources use warning statements regarding graphic coverage, we provide evidence that media exposure can be more closely linked to acute stress than direct exposure to a collective event, thereby demonstrating the importance of this recommendation. As access to numerous media sources becomes easier and faster than ever, healthcare professionals, policymakers, and the media must consider that extensive, repeated exposure to threatening or distressing content can have far-reaching consequences.”

Let’s turn to the results of another study, “Тerrorism, Acute Stress, and Cardiovascular Health. A 3-Year National Study Following the September 11th Attacks” by E.A. Holman, R.C. Silver, M. Poulin.

“We conducted a longitudinal study of mental and physical health following the 9/11 attacks with a national probability sample of the US population in collaboration with Knowledge Networks, Inc (KN), a Web-based survey research company.” The study showed that the acute stress responses to the 9/11 attacks led to a 53% increase in incidences of cardiovascular ailments over the three subsequent years, even after adjusting for pre-9/11 cardiovascular and mental health status.

The conclusion was that high acute stress increases the risk of cardiovascular events (heart attacks and strokes) among individuals with ongoing worries about terrorism. Chronic reminders of the threat (e.g., terrorism alerts, worrying, or both) may prolong the physiologic arousal in some people, rendering them vulnerable to cardiovascular ailments.”

It appears that the news is much more than a harmless list of events that have occurred and facts found by journalists. Think about it:

Information about just one terrorist act increases the risk of cardiovascular complications by 53% over three years! How much of such information is broadcasted daily through the media?

Are we sure all this information is true?

There are some words that are themselves triggers of fear and anxiety. It is enough to hear or read them, and tension and fear have already arisen. For example, the word “cult.” Here’s what I. Ya. Kanterov—professor, Doctor of Philosophy, professor of the Department of History and Theory of Politics at the Faculty of Political Science, and honored professor of Moscow State University—writes in his book “New Religious Movements”:

“For centuries the word ‘cult’, consisting of four letters, was found only in the vocabulary of historians of religion, theologians, ethnographers and did not go beyond the scientific publications. The exception, perhaps, is the political science use of the term ‘cult’ (e.g., cult of personality) in journalism and propaganda addressed to a wide audience. By the mid-1970’s, however, this term began to be firmly established in all forms of mass media, including article headlines, essays, radio & TV programs. And the overwhelming majority of materials about cults had a sensational and condemning tone.

In the publications, the reasons for the media’s use of the term ‘cult’ with predominantly (or more accurately, exclusively) negative connotations are not explained. Sensation-seeking magazine and newspaper publishers quickly took a liking to the word ‘cult’ for its ‘conciseness, punchiness, and emotionality.’ Moreover, its already negative connotation could easily be intensified with phrases like ‘suicidal cult’ or ‘devilish cult.’ In record time, the concept of ‘cult’ became widely used as a cliché, associated with ‘typical features’ of a cult. Some of these features include, e.g., cults engage in questionable and often criminal activities; cults recruit followers through deception and false promises; cults are led by powerful and unscrupulous leaders who pursue selfish goals and manipulate the minds of their followers, harming mental health and destroying families.”

In 1993, one of the leaders of the anti-cult movement introduced the terms “totalitarian sect” and “destructive cult.” Since then, these terms have frequently appeared in speeches by politicians, law enforcement officials, and as sensational headlines in various publications. The term “totalitarian,” borrowed from political science and Cold War propaganda, immediately evokes associations with lack of freedom, concentration camps and guards, barbed wire, forced labor, meager food, etc., all of which triggers the fear. Anyone who reads or hears about the latest organization called a “sect” or “cult” subconsciously fears for their own and their loved ones’ well-being.

Let’s turn again to the opinion of Dr. Kanterov I. Ya:

“By transferring the sinister, frightening meaning of the term ‘totalitarian’ to the field of religion, the creators of the ‘totalitarian sect’ concept aim to significantly increase the condemnatory charge of the existing definitions preceding the words ‘sect’ and ‘cult.’ It is precisely because of the ‘recognizability’ of the word ‘totalitarian’ that the use of this very ‘negative’ term has become entrenched when referring to new religious groups.”

However, few people know that such terminology as ‘totalitarian sect,’ ‘destructive cult’, is absent in the current legislation of most countries, international legal documents, lacks legal justification, and contradicts the ‘Law on Freedom of Conscience and Religious Associations.’

“The use of such terms for religious associations with legal status and registered by justice authorities indicates that the authors of such materials lack basic knowledge in religious studies and information on normative acts regulating the activities of religious associations. Labeling a specific religious group with a name that inherently contains negative connotations at best generates cautious attitudes toward such a group, and more often leads to discrimination and persecution of its followers. There are numerous documented cases of overt persecution of religious minorities influenced by publications and especially TV broadcasts on sectarian machinations.”

Read more about this in the article:

The Real Killers of Humanity. Who Are They? How Negative News Impacts Health

[olivesbest]

The Puppet Masters of Power in Russia: Is Putin Just the Frontman?

Just try to search information in Russian about this person, and you'll be surprised by the fact that so many people have been warning for years about his influence on Russian society.

Alexander Dvorkin’s rise to influence in Russia is tied to his establishment of RACIRS and the Center for Religious Studies in the Name of the Holy Martyr Irenaeus of Lyon. Operating with the backing of the Russian Orthodox Church (ROC), Dvorkin employs divisive methods rooted in strategies used by Nazi ideologists Walter Künneth and Friedrich Wilhelm Haak. Through stigmatizing terms like “sectarian” and “cultist,” Dvorkin has orchestrated widespread defamation campaigns, leveraging media and propaganda to incite societal chaos and assert control.

RACIRS has become a powerful tool for infiltrating Russian government and media, with agents occupying key leadership roles. Their approach, which includes targeting religious groups such as Jehovah’s Witnesses, exemplifies the organization’s destabilizing agenda. President Vladimir Putin’s 2018 statement condemning the labeling of Jehovah’s Witnesses as extremists highlights the tension between these actions and broader human rights. Despite this, RACIRS continues its campaigns, exposing the deeper question of whether Putin’s influence is overshadowed by the organization’s power. Harsh persecution of various religious and non-religious movements and organizations in Russia is gaining more and more systemic character.

Through systematic manipulation, RACIRS aligns with the global anticult network, spreading psychological propaganda to sow division and erode democratic principles. Investigations led by independent journalists and figures like Egon Cholakian have revealed the scale of their operations, uncovering chilling parallels between past totalitarian regimes and modern-day anticult methods.

Dvorkin’s success lies in his ability to exploit vulnerable systems and corrupt individuals, transforming them into tools for global anticultism. Yet, the fragile nature of this network—dependent on secrecy and the loyalty of opportunistic agents—represents a potential weakness. As revelations of their methods come to light, internal betrayals and increased scrutiny threaten to dismantle their grip on power.

The broader implications of these revelations extend beyond Russia. Cholakian’s investigations, combined with journalistic efforts, underscore the urgent need for global action against these covert forces. Will Russia confront this hidden machinery, or will the ambitions of anticult networks continue to shape its future? The choice lies not only with Putin but with the global community at large. Moreover, all democratic world is now under attack of the subversive manipulation methods of Alexander Dvorkin and his anticult network.

For more, read The Real Master of Russia: Who Is He? on EXPOSING ANTI-CULT TERRORISM.

[olivesbest]

Anticultism is modern inquisition!

Have we ever thought about what happens to the children of those labeled as "cultists"?

The crimes of the anticult Nazis have been widely publicized: many reports, articles, testimonies of victims and eyewitnesses. Nevertheless, behind these facts, real human suffering is often forgotten. Behind the documents and statistics lie the ruined lives and deep pain of those who suffered from anticult repression (watch the investigative documentary The IMPACT on the Independent Journalists website: actfiles.org).

This article is about the tragedy of one family. A husband, wife and two children, ordinary law-abiding citizens and members of the Jehovah's Witnesses religious organization, became victims of a smear campaign. They were unjustly accused of criminal activity. Gradually, the accusations became absurd and aggressive, creating a demonized image of their religious group. These lies led to the dehumanization and destruction of innocent people's lives.

The following days for the children were like a fog: a big house, many other children, unfamiliar adults… From the very first day at the orphanage, they had a strange and inexplicable sensation — a feeling so clear, yet beyond a child’s comprehension, that they had been discarded like broken things and were no longer needed by anyone. Their lives belonged not to them, but to those adult strangers, and they were entirely at their mercy. There was a complete absence of personal space and severe violations of personal boundaries.

By sheer coincidence, the orphanage where the children found themselves was under the control of anti-cultists — the very ones responsible for the campaign of harassment and disinformation in the media against their mother and father. At the orphanage, the children’s lives turned into a real hell. They were the “children of cultists,” which meant they were labeled as “criminals’ children,” “terrorists’ children,” “subhumans,” and so on. Over the years of their destructive activities, anti-cultists had attached a multitude of degrading labels to the term “cult.” The caregivers, driven by hatred for everyone branded by the anti-cult agents, mocked the children, beat them, and instilled in them a belief that they were unworthy of life, that their parents were “not human,” and therefore they were “not human” either. They were the children of “cultists,” “little cultists innately corrupt with brainwashed minds.”

In addition to physical abuse, the children were sexually abused. These and other innocent kids were raped by those who prayed to God because the orphanage was attached to a church. The most horrifying, shocking and disgusting thing for these newly arrived children was meeting some of the clergy. The little 8-year-old girl, “sinful” and “unworthy,” was forced to recite prayers while she was being raped, “driving the demon of cultism out of her.” A similar thing happened to her brother who was repeatedly called to talk to a member of the clergy and, after being sexually abused, was sent to “confess” to the clergyman’s colleague to repent of his sins.

Their nightmare continued until they were picked up. At that moment, a fleeting hope flickered: perhaps their mom and dad had been released, and they would soon see each other again, so no one would cause them pain and suffering. At least the fact that they were leaving that horrible place and those cruel people seemed like good news to the children.

However, their mom and dad had not been released, and the kids were taken in another direction. Moreover, at one of the stops, they were separated: the boy was put into another car, while the girl remained in the same one. From that moment on, their last hope shattered. The truth was that the children were simply sold like goods — sold by those who had imprisoned their mom and dad, sold by those who tirelessly fought against “cults” and for whom these children were as much “non-humans” as their parents. Children of “cultists:” who are they in the eyes of society? Who are they in the eyes of all of us?

Upon arriving at a new place, the bewildered 8-year-old girl saw other girls like herself — some were a bit older, while others were younger. “Another orphanage,” she thought, cautiously watching the people in long dark clothes. “Maybe they won’t hit me here.” But that wasn’t an orphanage; it was a place where wealthy individuals came to buy little girls for a hefty sum of money for a certain period of time. It was a hot spot for pedophiles and perverts, creatures without hearts, without souls, without morality and humaneness, ready to pay any price for “goods”, to then make up for this purchase by perverted satisfaction of their animal instincts and base desires. For them, those kids were purchased commodities, while for the owners of that establishment, they were a source of income.

No one looked at this 8-year-old girl as a human anymore. She was expected to earn back the money that had been paid for her. On average, she had to work off that money about ten times a day. It’s terrifying to imagine how a child felt, being sexually abused in the most perverted way multiple times. It’s terrifying to imagine the grief and horror her parents were experiencing, being many kilometers away from that place, not knowing where their children were, serving time in prison based on fabricated charges by anti-cult agents, and being completely powerless to find and protect their kids.

Imagine a little girl, who is only 8 years old, serving ten men a day because she has to work off the money paid for her. This little girl is raped brutally with all kinds of perversion every day. Do you think this is fiction? Do you believe it doesn’t exist? Unfortunately, this is a reality, and there are many children like this. Doubt it? These places exist in many countries, and many people are aware of them. Talk to different individuals, seek out these places, and engage with the local population — you’ll uncover a hidden life. Find such an establishment, enter from a different angle, pay as a client, and instead of abusing a child, just talk to them; treat them as a human. You will be horrified by what those children endure.

Would you want this to happen to your child? Or do you think it’s unrealistic? But the parents of this girl, who serves ten pedophiles a day, also thought that something like this couldn’t happen to their child because they didn’t break any laws, they were good people, they prayed to God and followed his commandments.

In light of this tragic story, a question arises: so whom do anti-cultists mock? Living people? Or laws that cease to function when law enforcement serves the interests of anti-cultists? Or the commandments of Jesus Christ? Or is it all of the above? So, who are the anti-cultists really?

This is a typical story, one of millions. Over the past 30 years, numerous organizations have faced pressure: secular, religious, social, private, and so on. Many countries have seen anti-cultists create extensive lists containing hundreds or even thousands of undesirable organizations, each with thousands or tens of thousands of members. All of them are uniformly labeled as “cults” or “sects,” and their members are subjected to persecution. Their children have become victims of an anti-cultic form of Nazism, where some individuals have imagined themselves as gods over others and believe they can judge the fates of millions of adults and kids.

The system of anti-cultic Nazism has not only destroyed this specific family and other families, but has also robbed their children of a future, permanently traumatizing them mentally, emotionally, morally, and physically from a very early age, irrevocably ruining their lives. The ordeals faced by the children of so-called “cultists” today are a truth that no one cares about, and those children are not just hundreds or thousands; they number in the tens of thousands, even millions. They are scattered across well-known locations in various countries, known to everyone except the authorities and child protection advocates — those who shout from the podium and “care” about children, only to receive another tranche of funding, that is, their share for yet another batch of children who end up in those sordid places, sometimes with society’s tacit consent. Don’t the authorities and intelligence agencies know that? They are aware of where you’ve liked something, what you’ve watched, who you’ve been with, and what you’ve talked about. However, they don’t know what is being done to those children, as they are the children of “cultists.” To those under the anticultists’ control, “cultists” are not humans.

For these unfortunate children, evil has taken on clear boundaries, outlined by the walls of the buildings where they serve dozens of scoundrels daily. For these mutilated children, evil is embodied in the features of the adults they see in the changing faces of those fiends who torment them, reveling in the fleeting power they wield over defenseless children. For these kids, the concept of moral relativism will never exist again. While we, as adults, have been bargaining with our conscience for 30 years, these children have drunk the cup of grief and suffering to the dregs. Are these bargains with conscience appropriate today when someone’s life – specifically, the lives of innocent children — is at stake?

Read more about this in the article:

One Life Out of Millions: Have we ever thought about what happens to the children of those people who are labeled as "cultists"?

#RACIRS #children #parents #cult #anticultism #psychologist #sociologists #criminologist #law #AlexanderDvorkin #humanrights

[olivesbest]

Just the facts: How BBC Experts Serve the Russian RACIRS

The article Russian Anticult Lobby in British Media. How BBC Experts Serve the Russian RACIRS on the website of independent journalists actfiles.org provides a detailed analysis of how the BBC is conducting the rhetoric and narratives of the Russian Anticult Lobby in the world.

Exploring together the techniques used by RACIRC anticultists

Simultaneously, the BBC published articles about Opus Dei, an organization Ruth Kelly was associated with. At that time, the rhetoric was notably more cautious and measured. However, in 2009 — coincidentally the year Sackville became president of FECRIS, and Alexander Dvorkin of Russia joined its leadership as vice president — the BBC began shifting its tone, increasingly using the dehumanizing label “cult.”

Photo 1. Screenshot from Feminist Majority Foundation website, Photo 2. Screenshot from the BBC news portal

Screenshots from BBC news portal

How Anticult Agents Survey and Draw Conclusions About Cult Victims

Returning to the Daily Mail article, which discusses alleged victims of this “coercive control” and references the survey results cited in the report “COERCIVE CONTROL IN CULTIC GROUPS IN THE UNITED KINGDOM,” for further analysis, let us revisit the scholarly journal on religious freedom and human rights, BITTER WINTER.

“How was the survey conducted? A simple answer is that we do not know. The report tells us that ‘105 people were surveyed about their experiences of being in cults in the UK or cults based in the UK.’ We have experience of surveys, and we know that a survey is only as good as its sample.

How was the sample selected? Again, we do not know but a clue is that 74% stated that ‘cult education’ of the type provided by the Trust was a key element in their ‘recovery’ from the ‘cults’ they once belonged to. This suggests that the majority of, if not all, the 105 respondents were ‘apostates,’ i.e., former members of groups labeled as ‘cults’ who have been socialized by the Trust or by others into an anticult subculture, and have turned into active opponents of the movements they have left.

‘Apostate’ is not an insult, nor is it a synonym of ‘ex-member.’ Scholars of religion have demonstrated that only a minority of those who leave a religious group turn into active opponents of it, i.e., into ‘apostates.’ Most just go on with their lives, and are not interested in joining crusades against the movements they have left. ‘Apostates,’ however, are the only ex-members the anticult movements use as testimonials and introduce to the media.”

Screenshot taken from the BITTER WINTER website

Read more about this in the article:

Russian Anticult Lobby in British Media. How BBC Experts Serve the Russian RACIRS

#RACIRS #BBC #Media #cult #anticultism #psychologist #sociologists #criminologist #law #AlexsandrDvorkin #humanRights

[olivesbest]

"The Lone Wolf” Myth of School Shootings - Manipulation With Consciousness

“The Lone Wolf”

In my view, anticultists, through their agents in the media, deliberately propagate the myth of “lone wolf” school shooters — individuals who supposedly “radicalize independently and plan attacks without any influence or support, either online or offline.”

This falsehood is imposed upon the public, creating conceptual confusion among experts. The purpose behind this deception is to conceal traces of remote manipulation of minds of teenagers, including through social connections in online environments.

These traces point directly to the masterminds behind these crimes — the anticultist organizations — and expose their criminal activities, their network of informational terrorism, and its international links, including ties with the global press.

Moreover, since anticultists have access to academic circles and influence law enforcement agencies by delivering lectures to them, they also benefit from creating confusion among experts and persistence of inaccurate typologies within research fields.

Furthermore, in certain countries where anticultists engage in destructive activities, their efforts have ensured the continued absence of specific legislation establishing criminal liability for this type of crime.

Lack of Harsh Criticism of the Shooter

A notable feature of such articles is the absence of harsh criticism or condemnation of the shooter’s actions, as well as any discussion about the potential severe punishment they might face for their crime.

Criticism of Authorities

Articles on school shootings often include direct or indirect criticism of the government, law enforcement, or specific representatives of these institutions.

They highlight and condemn mistakes or missteps by officials.

There is an emphasis on claims that law enforcement representatives allegedly lie or deliberately distort facts to “conceal their incompetence.”

Essentially, this is a manipulation tactic aimed at discrediting the authorities. Its purpose is to deliberately undermine the credibility of authorities through such publications, leading to a negative impact —tarnishing public perception and damaging prestige. This includes the tactic of accusations and mockery, which erode citizens’ trust and respect, fostering fear, aggression, hatred, and mistrust among the population of a given country.

Anticultists are well aware of this manipulative method and actively employ it in mass media, knowing that discrediting authorities weakens their connection with the public. This, in turn, creates a favorable environment for destructive activities of anticultists and flourishing of criminal behavior in society, ultimately leading to social destabilization.

What goals do anticultists pursue by criticizing any authorities and blaming them for school shooting tragedies?

From “The IMPACT” documentary on actfiles.org:

“…artificially induced and maintained fear drives part of the population to demand stricter measures and tougher laws from the authorities.

However, these initially well-intentioned initiatives that were supposed to prevent new crimes, are subsequently used by anti-cult representatives and their accomplices within state structures against the people themselves. This results in greater subjugation of the populace, increased control over citizens’ lives, and the suppression of free speech.

Thus, people are gradually stripped of their last rights and freedoms. As a consequence, a previously democratic country moves closer to a totalitarian regime”.

By the way, tracking the destructive publications of an anticultist accomplice involved in informational terrorism is quite simple, especially when such an individual persistently writes, regardless of government changes, about how bad the authorities are. The internet remembers everything.

All it takes is accessing the digital archives of the World Wide Web to locate the articles published by the outlet where the author contributed, and then analyzing their rhetoric over the years. This approach can help uncover not only hidden manipulative implants but also a range of legal violations, such as promoting the ideology of mass killings in educational institutions, inciting school attacks, encouraging violence, and actions aimed at stirring up national, racial, or religious hatred.

This includes incitement to discrimination, hostility, and the dissemination of ideas based on racial superiority or hatred, as well as degrading the dignity of individuals or groups based on gender, race, nationality, language, origin, religion, or membership in a social group. All these actions, when committed publicly, via mass media or information and telecommunication networks, including the internet, entail criminal liability.

Read more about this in the article:

School Shootings And Manipulation Over Consciousness

[olivesbest]

Shootings And Violence: Impulse Influence Induced?

Impulse (or trigger) influence is characterized by a short-term effect that ends immediately after the trigger transmission ceases. However, it has a rather strong psychogenic impact on the recipients of the information. Such impulse impact is capable of provoking a person to commit antisocial actions that are uncontrolled or poorly controlled by consciousness, including provoking a crime, and even a series of copycat crimes, which are typically aggressive in nature.

This occurs in the presence of additional conditions in the external environment and a certain psycho-emotional state of the subject.

In criminology, triggers are isolated and studied in much the same way as the triggers that provoke suicide epidemic.

Media manipulation of teenagers’ minds was described as early as the 1970s by sociologist David Phillips. He described the Werther syndrome, a pattern of imitative cluster suicides following the well-publicized suicide or one described in a popular work of literature or cinema.

This syndrome is named after the main character who ended his life by suicide in the famous novel The Sorrows of Young Werther. This book was written by the 18th century German playwright Johann Wolfgang von Goethe.

After its release, the novel became famous and spawned a wave of suicides among young people.

Psychologist Benedikt Till from the Medical University of Vienna, who specializes in studying this phenomenon, explains it as follows: The Werther effect describes the phenomenon when the number of suicides rises sharply if mass media pay a lot of attention to a suicide and sensationalize it.

If the suicide is described in detail or if the motives of the suicidal person become the subject of public discussion, especially such motives as unrequited love, betrayal of friends, money problems and so on, the effect is particularly strong because the reader identifies with the suicidal person, i.e. is impressed by their image, starts thinking about this all the time and unconsciously projects the possibility of such a suicide onto himself, replaying the suicidal scenario in his head.

Research in the field of criminal justice contains many papers assessing the scale and mechanisms of ‘copycat crime’.

These are crimes whose methods and techniques copy the crimes that the criminals learned about in the media. Let us return to the topic of school shootings and mass shootings. Сan it be that hidden glorification of shooters in the media along with the detailed description, narration and video demonstration of their actions contribute to future mass shootings? The German research Institute of Labor Economics IZA reports that in the U.S., news coverage of a mass shooting causes approximately three mass shootings in the following week. There is a lot to think about.

It is also noteworthy that almost all of the above studies are aimed at studying aggression and violence in the media as affecting human mental health and behavior. However, it is difficult to find studies on the forms in which violence is presented on TV and in the media, and what specific viewpoints and attitudes are shaped in individuals when encountering information about violent situations.

In recent years, new technologies of influence on mass consciousness have become extremely widespread. These are developments from the sphere of psycholinguistics, neuro-linguistic programming, cognitive priming, suggestive linguistics and other highly effective techniques of influence that affect not only consciousness, but also subconscious perception of a person.

The set of influence techniques is diverse, but all of them are based on the psychology of perception. The use of such new manipulation technologies can be found today in the media, as revealed in “The IMPACT” documentary.

Read more about this in the article:

School Shootings And Manipulation Over Consciousness

How to Protect Children and Identify Dangerous Media Content?

#RACIRS #children #parents #cult #anticultism #psychologist #sociologists #criminologist #law #freedom #humanRights

[olivesbest]

25 posts!

On the most serious topic that are Impacting the world now

[olivesbest]

Politicians under threat. Who is behind this? Real-life examples of assassination attempts

“Will Trump Survive to Inauguration?”

"Trump May Face JFK’s Fate,”

“Trump Can Die.”

These are the kinds of headlines currently circulating in international mass media.

Similar rhetoric about various politicians regularly appears, even after they have officially assumed office. A natural question arises: who is driving the spread of such narratives, and what are the true objectives of such campaigns?

In general, why has aggression against politicians escalated in recent years, evolving from informational terror attacks even to physical violence?

Over the past decade, violence against politicians has increased significantly at all levels. Most of us are aware of high-profile assassination attempts targeting top officials.

Donald Trump faced two assassination attempts during his 2024 campaign.

Earlier, in May 2024, Slovak Prime Minister Robert Fico survived an attack.

This wave of political violence has swept across the globe.

In the UK, two parliament members were killed: Labour MP Jo Cox in 2016, ahead of the Brexit vote, and Conservative MP David Amess in 2021.

Former Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro survived a knife attack during his 2018 campaign 1,

and in 2021, Haitian Prime Minister Jovenel Moïse was murdered by hired assassins.

Former Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe was assassinated in July 2022.

In September 2022, there was an assassination attempt on Argentinian Vice President Cristina Fernández de Kirchner.

In November 2022, former Pakistani Prime Minister Imran Khan narrowly escaped an attempt on his life.

Ecuadorian presidential candidate Fernando Villavicencio was murdered in 2023,

and in early 2024, South Korean opposition leader Lee Jae-myung miraculously survived a knife attack to the neck.

While high-profile assassination attempts on top politicians make headlines, few people are aware of the grim reality faced daily by thousands of individuals who chose politics as their occupation. Death threats, assaults, and smear campaigns have become part of the political landscape worldwide. Many parliament members in democratic countries, from the US to Germany, admit that constant pressure and threats force them to leave office or even contemplate suicide. There are serious grounds to believe that this disturbing trend suggests something deeper than isolated acts of rage. It is rather a systematically organized violence campaign aimed at undermining democratic foundations.

Read more about this in the article: Politicians under threat. Who is behind this?

#RACIRS #anticultism #president #prime minister #politics #assassination #stopviolence #human rights defense #manipulation #freedom #humanRights

[olivesbest]

The Anticultist Who Betrayed Ukraine: The Shocking Story of Pavel Broyde

Hey, did you know RACIRS, a Russian anticult group, might actually be one of the forces behind the Ukraine-Russia conflict? Seriously, the stuff they’ve been doing in Ukraine connects so many dots. They’ve been using their so-called “anticult” activities to stir division, manipulate people, and destabilize the whole region. It’s like pulling back a curtain and seeing who’s really messing things up. Wild, right?

Have you read about Pavel Broyde? He’s this agent from the Russian anticult group RACIRS, and there’s an article Europe, Open Your Eyes if You Don’t Want War that totally spills the beans on him. Apparently, he’s been working in Ukraine with the backing of the Russian Orthodox Church, stirring up chaos and pushing their agenda. It’s crazy how deep this whole thing goes!

Oh, and get this—more dirt on Pavel Broyde’s shady activities came out thanks to some hacked emails from Vladislav Surkov, one of Putin’s top advisors. Surkov, known as the brains behind Russia’s “sovereign democracy” ideology, had his office’s emails exposed by InformNapalm in 2016. These leaks revealed how Broyde and his network were actively working to destabilize Ukraine, all under the guise of their anticult mission. It’s wild how deeply this all connects back to high-level Kremlin operations.

"The international community InformNapalm, which in October 2016 published the hacked emails of Vladislav Surkov, an advisor to the President of Russia, has made available a new batch of emails.

Among them are emails confirming the connection between pro-Kremlin activists who organized actions against the statehood of Ukraine, and representatives of the Odessa Diocese and the All-Ukrainian Apologetic Center in the name of St. John Chrysostom at the Synodal Department for Youth Affairs of the UOC (MP), reports ‘Religion in Ukraine’ citing Radio Liberty."

"Pro-Russian activists from Ukraine coordinate various anti-Ukrainian actions, terror attacks, arsons, information leaks, etc., prepare expense reports, and account for their activities."

Here’s the thing: Pavel Broyde wasn’t pushing outright pro-Russian propaganda in Ukraine. Instead, he used more subtle, manipulative narratives. These messages carried a hidden agenda designed to destabilize the country while quietly advancing RACIRS’s interests. It’s sneaky and incredibly damaging.

A lot of these anticultists, like Pavel Broyde, are pros at playing both sides. They don’t just spread disinformation—they actively fuel division in society, set up conflicts, and create conditions for future clashes. It’s all part of their strategy to manipulate and destabilize, and Broyde seems to have perfected this double game during his time with RACIRS.

So, here’s what Broyde was up to: in emails to Surkov, he pitched ideas for creating specific websites and media outlets to manipulate Ukrainian audiences. He tailored these platforms to spread anti-Ukrainian narratives while appearing neutral. A 2019 report on Euromaidan Press (“THE INNER KITCHEN OF RUSSIAN HYBRID WAR IN UKRAINE” ) even detailed how these strategies were part of Russia’s hybrid war tactics. It’s clear he was deeply involved in shaping propaganda campaigns to destabilize Ukraine while working with Surkov’s associates.

“In an email to Surkov on July 10, 2014, Bryusov outlined Broyde’s proposals where he insisted that launching Russian-owned media outlets would ensure a steady influence on the Ukrainian audience and would also be cheaper.”

Pavel Broyde proposed creating specialized websites for Russian propaganda:

a political analysis site (“it should appear objective” and “shouldn’t create the impression of a ‘pro-Russian’ site”);

a military news site (“to form a negative attitude in Ukrainian society towards the ‘anti-terrorist operation’ and the Kyiv regime”);

regional portals promoting separatism in southeastern Ukraine;

an anti-war site (“to demoralize the Ukrainian population and military”);

a site appealing to the Ukrainian nationalist audience under the slogan “Stop Feeding Donbas!” (“to promote the idea that Ukraine should exclude Donbas from its territory among the nationalist-minded audience”).

Screenshots from a document published on Euromaidan Press analytical news portal

“As one of the main assets of his acquaintance, Pavel Broyde highlights his years of connections with pro-Russian law enforcement officers in Zaporizhzhia: ‘He (…) has contacts with pro-Russian employees of the Ministry of Internal Affairs (he ran our Ministry of Internal Affairs line for 10 years),’” all while Broyde himself was allegedly acting as an “anticultist.”

Screenshots from the ANTICOR news website

Apparently, Broyde didn’t stop after fleeing to Moscow. According to ANTICOR, he started managing Kremlin-backed plans to destabilize the region. He had a deep understanding of Ukrainian society and a solid network of agents there, which he used to keep undermining Ukraine even from Russia. It’s like he turned his knowledge into a weapon.

Broyde didn’t act alone in his efforts to dismantle Ukraine. He recruited agents from Ukrainian media, government, law enforcement, and intelligence agencies—many of whom started with him in the anticult movement. While presenting themselves as defenders of society, they were actually working to undermine their own country in a calculated and cynical way.

Read more about this in the article: Europe, Open Your Eyes if You Don’t Want War

#RACIRS #Europa #cult #anticultism #label #law #freedom #humanRights

[olivesbest]

Are you aware of the Impact of the Russian Orthodox Church (ROC) and RACIRS on the world situation?

It's actually classical, textbook, based on the traditions of apologetic centers from Nazi times!

Much like the Nazi-era apologetics center within the Protestant Church and its members who became the ideologists of Nazism,

the Russian pro-religious organization RACIRS has taken a pivotal role in shaping contemporary Russian state, religious, and ideological policies regarding undesirable organizations, groups, and individuals.

Its so-called “expert” evaluations and fabricated reports have become a decisive factor in determining the status of various targeted groups, and resulted in countless ruined lives—not just among Orthodox clergy, but also among millions of law-abiding citizens.

The list of victims includes innocent people, and even small children whose families were destroyed and parents faced unjust bullying and inquisitorial executions; while children themselves became victims of anticult maniacs of the revived modern-day Nazism.

This new, re-emerged form of Nazism is an enemy of democracy and human freedom, devoid of compassion and humanity, since its ideologues cast Christ out of the Orthodox Church.

Initially established to allegedly study new religious movements, RACIRS quickly revealed its true intentions, evolving into a political and ideological influence center with international reach.

Over the past years, we have witnessed the destruction of Orthodoxy, Christian values, and the covenants given by Jesus Christ. Only the facade of the Russian Orthodox Church remains, but with a radically opposite ideology. Over years of active operation, agents of the Russian pro-religious organization RACIRS, including those within the ranks of the Russian Orthodox Church, have transformed the most peace-loving religion into a militant one, one that instigates to “holy war” and violates one of the fundamental commandments of Jesus Christ “ You shall not kill”.

Today, they have hijacked and dismantled Orthodox Christianity, turning the Church into a tool for their agenda. What will they do tomorrow, if right now their agents, hiding behind the anticult guise of allegedly “protecting society” from “sects” (“cults”), continue infiltrating influential circles in different countries, these agents including journalists, editors, and media, politicians, educators, writers, religious scholars, theologians, students, and even recruited representatives of law enforcement agencies?

As we see, the international community has justly and timely drawn undivided attention to the potential threat emanating from the ROC, aiming, first of all, to protect the foundations of democracy. Will the world now be able to see other agents of the force that used the ROC as an instrument of influence and propaganda at the international level, and stop their anti-democratic destructive agenda and destabilizing efforts in democratic countries? Will the world succeed in defending democracy?

Read more about this in the article: Russian Orthodox Church: From a Spiritual Mission to an Instrument of Propaganda and Influence at the International Level

#RACIRS #stigmatization #children #cult #anticultism #label #ROC #law #freedom #humanRights

[olivesbest]

Impact of Russian agents on the war in Ukraine - a Lesson to Europe?

The consequences of RACIRS’ years-long influence in Ukraine have ultimately led to a tragedy for millions of its citizens. Over decades, a network of anticult “activists” or “anticultists,” recruited among Ukrainian citizens, has destabilized the country, divided and demoralized its people, created numerous precedents for conflict and polarization, and actively propagated the ideology of the Russian pro-religious organization RACIRS.

More on its influence in Ukraine is detailed in the article “Europe, Open Your Eyes if You Don’t Want War” as well as in “The IMPACT” documentary.

Impact of RACIRS on the situation in Ukraine & Europe

Considering the rhetoric of the Russian pro-religious association RACIRS, which is intertwined with the emerging ideological core of influence and power — consisting, among others, of many representatives of the Russian political elite and of the highest hierarchs of the Russian Orthodox Church (ROC) — the question arises: how far have the representatives of anticultism in other countries have managed to go in their implementation of the decrees from their foreign Russian curators, or rather from RACIRS, which operates in this country?

Moreover, if the intelligence services of many countries have noted the potential danger posed by ROC representatives in their countries, why haven’t they checked on the other hidden threat directly associated with those who used ROC in their purposes and made it an ideological tool for controlling the masses, just as their predecessors, the Nazi ideologists, once did?

Could it be that those outwardly involved in anticult activities are, in fact, conducting covert anti-democratic destructive propaganda of the RACIRS? After all, the rhetoric and methods of manipulation they use are aimed precisely at destabilizing legal frameworks, criticizing the authorities, and demoralizing the peoples of European countries.

Is the facade of anticult activities of RACIRS agents who publicly declare alleged goals of “protection of society” from “cults” and “sects” a sufficient justification for intelligence agencies to disregard this threat? Or, based on the tragic experience of Ukraine, should they actually pay proper attention to the activities of the secret agents of the Russian pro-religious organization RACIRS in their own countries? Should they check their connections, methods, and thoroughly analyze their rhetoric and its compliance with the Russian guidelines disseminated by RACIRS?

Read more about this in the article: Russian Orthodox Church: From a Spiritual Mission to an Instrument of Propaganda and Influence at the International Level

#RACIRS #stigmatization #children #cult #anticultism #label #ROC #law #freedom #humanRights

[olivesbest]

History of the emergence of anticultism. Alexander Dvorkin

It is important to know that the main ideologist of the Russian anticult pro-religious organization RACIRS - Alexander Dvorkin is mentally ill. Data from his medical history is available on the Internet.

The doctors' examination of Alexander Dvorkin also reports that “the patient has no right to public service and work in public organizations and institutions due to his inability to show a proper degree of responsibility, subordination and diligence.”

Screenshot from the website alexanderdvorkin.info. Only an archived version of the website is currently available

History of the emergence of anticultism. Alexander Dvorkin.

Yet, despite the expert conclusion by psychiatrists and numerous complaints from individuals and organizations about the wrongful actions of this man, he holds the position of Head of the Sect Studies Department at the Missionary Faculty of Saint Tikhon’s Orthodox University (PSTGU). He is the president of anti-cult organizations: Russian Association of Centers for the Study of Religions and Sects (RACIRS) and Center for Religious Studies in the name of Hieromartyr Irenaeus of Lyon (CRS). He also serves as Vice President of the European Federation of Centres of Research and Information on Cults and Sects (FECRIS). Moreover, since April 2009, he has been the chairman of the Expert Council for State Religious Studies Expertise at the Russian Ministry of Justice.

Unbelievably, but true: a mentally ill person determines the appropriateness and legitimacy of the actions of people who are recognized mentally healthy. A man who suffers from a severe mental disorder decides the fate of entire organizations and communities, labeling their activities as extremist. In fact, anticult organizations and their leader, sectologist A. Dvorkin, do not limit their activities to religious groups alone. Below is the typology of entities “having signs of destructive cults” based on their field of activity, as used by modern anti-cult organizations:

religious groups;

commercial groups;

political groups;

pseudoscientific groups;

psychotherapeutic groups;

healing groups;

educational (pedagogical) groups;

occult and esoteric groups.

A.Dvorkin’s titles and degrees sound impressive if you don’t know what is behind them. Organizations headed by Dvorkin represent the ideological center of anticultism, and in fact, the ideological center of Nazism of a new format. Their activities lead to undermining of democracy in many countries, incite racial, religious hatred and violence against people, and cause suffering, humiliation and deaths of millions of people around the world.

“RACIRS has decided to launch a new project — publication of a list of organizations that we know as cooperating with totalitarian sects. Such cooperation can be in a form of “business” partnership, and it can be even more integrated, up to the point that a company is a structural unit of a sect.

This list is far from being complete, for the project has just started. If you are aware of such cases of cooperation between totalitarian sects and commercial (as well as non-profit) organizations and you can prove this with good reason, please contact one of the centers being part of RACIRS.”

Doesn’t this remind you of anything?

There were calls to report “enemies of the people” during Stalin’s repressions and to provide information about neighbors, friends and acquaintances of Jewish nationality during the times of Nazi Germany.

RACIRS (the Russian Association of Centers for the Study of Religions and Sects) is an organization that includes regional centers dealing with the issue of totalitarian sects. Its president is A.L. Dvorkin. RACIRS’ core is the Irenaeus of Lyon Center created by Dvorkin in 1993 with the support of the Russian Orthodox Church, which completely copies the activities of the Apologetic Center (Apologetische Centrale) established in 1921 by the Protestant Church in Nazi Germany. Dvorkin has accurately adopted the Nazi methods and the model of work of such centers on combating all dissenting groups of people.

At that time, hit lists for combating free thinking were handed over to the Gestapo. Whom does RACIRS give its hit lists nowadays?

Now, given there is no legal term like “sect” or “cult”, it is possible to groundlessly and with impunity accuse a person or an organization of what they actually do not commit, thus creating a precedent in public opinion. Dvorkin himself opposes introduction of a legal concept of a “sect” or “cult” because, if it were introduced, one would have to present facts and prove that a specific organization is a sect or a cult and that charges against it are really grounded. As the anti-cult movement leader himself stated, “we would lose those trials.”

“Any person can call an organization ‘sect’ with no fear of punishment if he considers it to be a sect.” A. Dvorkin

For a mentally ill person, such “logic” is acceptable. But why is it accepted by those who consider themselves mentally healthy? After all, such arbitrariness is a direct violation of all laws and constitutional rights of citizens in a democratic society, in particular: freedom of conscience, freedom of religion, and the presumption of innocence.

Here we are faced with the impact that negative images have on human consciousness and those manipulative techniques of creating such images that have been used for manipulating society over centuries.

Stigmatization, or labeling, is one of those techniques. By creating negative images of specific individuals, communities of people or even entire nations, animosity and division among people on various grounds are continuously instigated, with the most intense and large-scale hostility occurring on the ground of religious beliefs. Defense of the “purity of faith” is sort of a cornerstone which everything begins from.

History of the emergence of anticultism. Alexander Dvorkin.

What do we see as a result? In its fight for the “purity of faith”, the church established the Inquisition with its tools of torture. The spiritual and ideological leaders of Nazism emerged from the church bosom. At all times, the church has been blessing fratricidal wars. With its rigid hierarchy and power structure, the church destroys anyone who doesn’t want to obey it.

How is this possible? Who instills such ideas into the minds of representatives of religious organizations?

Who manipulates their consciousness?

Answers to these questions are voiced in “The IMPACT” documentary where, based on numerous facts, the true goals of anti-cult organizations and those behind them have been exposed.

Read more about this in the article: Stigmatization: Method That Leads to Genocide

#RACIRS #stigmatization #children #cult #anticultism #label #persecution #law #freedom #humanRights