Register Now for SportStream 2024 - Videoguys
New Post has been published on https://thedigitalinsider.com/register-now-for-sportstream-2024-videoguys/
Register Now for SportStream 2024 - Videoguys
Tips, tricks, and tools for remote production and live video in sports
September 10th, 11th, and 12th @ 1pm each day
SCHEDULE
GIVEAWAYS
Tuesday, September 10th at 1pm EST:
Getting Started in Live Sports Production
Tips and tricks for youth sports organizations, intramural and club sports, and local independent leagues. Get an introduction to the tools and technology available today with an focus on affordable solutions that will allow you to grow your audience, create value for your sponsors and monetize your sports production.
Wednesday, September 11th at 1pm EST:
Elevate Sports Video with Broadcast Production Tools
Major Broadcasters and regional sports networks have created the production standard that your audience expects. Join SportStream as we introduce the graphics, analysis, replay and other tools that help you deliver the content that your sports fans expect.
Thursday, September 12th at 1pm EST:
Remote Production Workflow for Sports Coverage
Broadcasting all of your sporting events is easier than ever now that you can remove all production resources from the field. Your production team can control the content from multiple fields and events all at the same time; cover away games with ease and with no added expense; broadcast all events as they happen and distribute the live production across campus, social media and broadcasts simultaneously.
Videomaker One-Year Complimentary Digital Magazine Subscription
Everyone who registers will receive a FREE Videomaker one-year complimentary digital magazine subscription!
LiveU Prize Pack
Swag items from LiveU and a $50 Visa Gift Card – $100 value
MORE GIVEAWAYS COMING SOON!
Thanks to our sponsors for making this event FREE to attend
0 notes
On the YouTube Home Page
Something that’s been rattling in the back of my mind these past couple of months has to do with the algorithmically suggested content on sites like YouTube. Obviously the whole conceit of going on a website like that and just getting a straight up unfiltered feed of the stuff you’ve subscribed to is no longer on the table – I can sort of grow to live with that, even if it is reluctantly. However, there are some implications that come along with total algorithmic suggestion, which I am growing increasingly frustrated with on a pure “I interact with the things on screen” level.
I think the primary benefit of the new style of feed is the mixture of videos from channels you are subscribed to, along with some random stragglers from random people on the website who are posting in the same vague categories that you usually watch. You can get your weekly Tim Cain or 3kliksphilip video on the same page as the VoDs for someone’s livestream from a day ago with a total of 300-ish views. This is all randomly broken apart by a video that is obviously doing numbers into the millions, because the algorithm has generally sensed that this is of wider appeal to most people using the website, or the world as a whole. The contrarian in me obviously feels a little bit too patronised by that assumption and has absolutely no interest in that mass market crap, for better or worse. The former two categories, however, are all well and good, as far as I am concerned.
I mostly notice this stuff, because the very top of the website features a scrolling list of the topics it thinks I enjoy, from which I can select to only see videos suggested within that category exclusively. I essentially use this as a kind of indicator as to what the algorithm is using to generate the suggested feed. In a way, the dynamic has now changed from me simply listing my interests and being served exactly that which I’ve listed out, to me listing out my interests and the algorithm making educated guesses as to what I’d like to see, while I also make educated guesses as to what it was thinking about me and figuring out ways to change my patterns in order to make it actually show me what I want.
Let’s say I’m interested in Monster Hunter as a video game series. I’d generally like to see stuff from any of those tens of titles, because I’ve gone through most of them and have a general idea of what’s what. The unfortunate thing is that one of those games has mass market appeal, while the others remain niche and obviously less spread by the algorithm. What this results in is the algorithm noticing that I am into Monster Hunter as a whole, and then trying to present me with the most popular videos on that topic, which are almost always guaranteed to be those of the rather recent title – Monster Hunter: World. As previously stated, I’m the kind of contrarian hipster type, who doesn’t necessarily think that newest stuff is better for simply being the most recent. As such, I tend to not like that the broader idea of Monster Hunter is reduced to World and its expansion Iceborne. It becomes a self-reaffirming logical fallacy that if I like Monster Hunter, then I surely like World. However, to have it not only suggest World I’d need to not watch any of those videos, otherwise it’d continue to think it was right in its assumption and double down on it. If it sees that I’m not interacting with the “Monster Hunter: World” category, it doesn’t assume to make that statement any vaguer. It just assumes I’m not interested in “Monster Hunter” at all, even if I go to seek out videos of older titles on my own.
Every once in a while, by some miracle, that very specific “Monster Hunter: World” category turns in the much vaguer “Monster Hunter”, and the quality of the selection becomes much more in-tune with what I actually want to see. The problem is that I have no way of clapping my hands together and saying “good job, now keep it that way”. As such, it inevitably notices that I could be watching more numerically successful videos in that category and goes back to being specific and mostly popular stuff.
Then again, it does sometimes see me watch a single video on a topic and then hallucinate that I’d like to see that for the next year straight. I do think there have been strides towards getting less popular content into people’s eyes with some of the recommended videos in the side-bar being rather niche stuff, but those are few and far between. The issue is that watching something is a binary operation, and if that is the only thing you feed into the algorithm, there is no chance for you to adjust your preferences and see what you’d actually like. You have near zero control outside of watching whatever is serves up or simply leaving the website for the day.
1 note
·
View note
they have a point though. you wouldn't need everyone to accommodate you if you just lost weight, but you're too lazy to stick to a healthy diet and exercise. it's that simple. I'd like to see you back up your claims, but you have no proof. you have got to stop lying to yourselves and face the facts
Must I go through this again? Fine. FINE. You guys are working my nerves today. You want to talk about facing the facts? Let's face the fucking facts.
In 2022, the US market cap of the weight loss industry was $75 billion [1, 3]. In 2021, the global market cap of the weight loss industry was estimated at $224.27 billion [2].
In 2020, the market shrunk by about 25%, but rebounded and then some since then [1, 3] By 2030, the global weight loss industry is expected to be valued at $405.4 billion [2]. If diets really worked, this industry would fall overnight.
1. LaRosa, J. March 10, 2022. "U.S. Weight Loss Market Shrinks by 25% in 2020 with Pandemic, but Rebounds in 2021." Market Research Blog.
2. Staff. February 09, 2023. "[Latest] Global Weight Loss and Weight Management Market Size/Share Worth." Facts and Factors Research.
3. LaRosa, J. March 27, 2023. "U.S. Weight Loss Market Partially Recovers from the Pandemic." Market Research Blog.
Over 50 years of research conclusively demonstrates that virtually everyone who intentionally loses weight by manipulating their eating and exercise habits will regain the weight they lost within 3-5 years. And 75% will actually regain more weight than they lost [4].
4. Mann, T., Tomiyama, A.J., Westling, E., Lew, A.M., Samuels, B., Chatman, J. (2007). "Medicare’s Search For Effective Obesity Treatments: Diets Are Not The Answer." The American Psychologist, 62, 220-233. U.S. National Library of Medicine, Apr. 2007.
The annual odds of a fat person attaining a so-called “normal” weight and maintaining that for 5 years is approximately 1 in 1000 [5].
5. Fildes, A., Charlton, J., Rudisill, C., Littlejohns, P., Prevost, A.T., & Gulliford, M.C. (2015). “Probability of an Obese Person Attaining Normal Body Weight: Cohort Study Using Electronic Health Records.” American Journal of Public Health, July 16, 2015: e1–e6.
Doctors became so desperate that they resorted to amputating parts of the digestive tract (bariatric surgery) in the hopes that it might finally result in long-term weight-loss. Except that doesn’t work either. [6] And it turns out it causes death [7], addiction [8], malnutrition [9], and suicide [7].
6. Magro, Daniéla Oliviera, et al. “Long-Term Weight Regain after Gastric Bypass: A 5-Year Prospective Study - Obesity Surgery.” SpringerLink, 8 Apr. 2008.
7. Omalu, Bennet I, et al. “Death Rates and Causes of Death After Bariatric Surgery for Pennsylvania Residents, 1995 to 2004.” Jama Network, 1 Oct. 2007.
8. King, Wendy C., et al. “Prevalence of Alcohol Use Disorders Before and After Bariatric Surgery.” Jama Network, 20 June 2012.
9. Gletsu-Miller, Nana, and Breanne N. Wright. “Mineral Malnutrition Following Bariatric Surgery.” Advances In Nutrition: An International Review Journal, Sept. 2013.
Evidence suggests that repeatedly losing and gaining weight is linked to cardiovascular disease, stroke, diabetes and altered immune function [10].
10. Tomiyama, A Janet, et al. “Long‐term Effects of Dieting: Is Weight Loss Related to Health?” Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 6 July 2017.
Prescribed weight loss is the leading predictor of eating disorders [11].
11. Patton, GC, et al. “Onset of Adolescent Eating Disorders: Population Based Cohort Study over 3 Years.” BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.), 20 Mar. 1999.
The idea that “obesity” is unhealthy and can cause or exacerbate illnesses is a biased misrepresentation of the scientific literature that is informed more by bigotry than credible science [12].
12. Medvedyuk, Stella, et al. “Ideology, Obesity and the Social Determinants of Health: A Critical Analysis of the Obesity and Health Relationship” Taylor & Francis Online, 7 June 2017.
“Obesity” has no proven causative role in the onset of any chronic condition [13, 14] and its appearance may be a protective response to the onset of numerous chronic conditions generated from currently unknown causes [15, 16, 17, 18].
13. Kahn, BB, and JS Flier. “Obesity and Insulin Resistance.” The Journal of Clinical Investigation, Aug. 2000.
14. Cofield, Stacey S, et al. “Use of Causal Language in Observational Studies of Obesity and Nutrition.” Obesity Facts, 3 Dec. 2010.
15. Lavie, Carl J, et al. “Obesity and Cardiovascular Disease: Risk Factor, Paradox, and Impact of Weight Loss.” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 26 May 2009.
16. Uretsky, Seth, et al. “Obesity Paradox in Patients with Hypertension and Coronary Artery Disease.” The American Journal of Medicine, Oct. 2007.
17. Mullen, John T, et al. “The Obesity Paradox: Body Mass Index and Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Nonbariatric General Surgery.” Annals of Surgery, July 2005. 18. Tseng, Chin-Hsiao. “Obesity Paradox: Differential Effects on Cancer and Noncancer Mortality in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.” Atherosclerosis, Jan. 2013.
Fatness was associated with only 1/3 the associated deaths that previous research estimated and being “overweight” conferred no increased risk at all, and may even be a protective factor against all-causes mortality relative to lower weight categories [19].
19. Flegal, Katherine M. “The Obesity Wars and the Education of a Researcher: A Personal Account.” Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases, 15 June 2021.
Studies have observed that about 30% of so-called “normal weight” people are “unhealthy” whereas about 50% of so-called “overweight” people are “healthy”. Thus, using the BMI as an indicator of health results in the misclassification of some 75 million people in the United States alone [20].
20. Rey-López, JP, et al. “The Prevalence of Metabolically Healthy Obesity: A Systematic Review and Critical Evaluation of the Definitions Used.” Obesity Reviews : An Official Journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity, 15 Oct. 2014.
While epidemiologists use BMI to calculate national obesity rates (nearly 35% for adults and 18% for kids), the distinctions can be arbitrary. In 1998, the National Institutes of Health lowered the overweight threshold from 27.8 to 25—branding roughly 29 million Americans as fat overnight—to match international guidelines. But critics noted that those guidelines were drafted in part by the International Obesity Task Force, whose two principal funders were companies making weight loss drugs [21].
21. Butler, Kiera. “Why BMI Is a Big Fat Scam.” Mother Jones, 25 Aug. 2014.
Body size is largely determined by genetics [22].
22. Wardle, J. Carnell, C. Haworth, R. Plomin. “Evidence for a strong genetic influence on childhood adiposity despite the force of the obesogenic environment” American Journal of Clinical Nutrition Vol. 87, No. 2, Pages 398-404, February 2008.
Healthy lifestyle habits are associated with a significant decrease in mortality regardless of baseline body mass index [23].
23. Matheson, Eric M, et al. “Healthy Lifestyle Habits and Mortality in Overweight and Obese Individuals.” Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM, U.S. National Library of Medicine, 25 Feb. 2012.
Weight stigma itself is deadly. Research shows that weight-based discrimination increases risk of death by 60% [24].
24. Sutin, Angela R., et al. “Weight Discrimination and Risk of Mortality .” Association for Psychological Science, 25 Sept. 2015.
Fat stigma in the medical establishment [25] and society at large arguably [26] kills more fat people than fat does [27, 28, 29].
25. Puhl, Rebecca, and Kelly D. Bronwell. “Bias, Discrimination, and Obesity.” Obesity Research, 6 Sept. 2012.
26. Engber, Daniel. “Glutton Intolerance: What If a War on Obesity Only Makes the Problem Worse?” Slate, 5 Oct. 2009.
27. Teachman, B. A., Gapinski, K. D., Brownell, K. D., Rawlins, M., & Jeyaram, S. (2003). Demonstrations of implicit anti-fat bias: The impact of providing causal information and evoking empathy. Health Psychology, 22(1), 68–78.
28. Chastain, Ragen. “So My Doctor Tried to Kill Me.” Dances With Fat, 15 Dec. 2009. 29. Sutin, Angelina R, Yannick Stephan, and Antonio Terraciano. “Weight Discrimination and Risk of Mortality.” Psychological Science, 26 Nov. 2015.
There's my "proof." Where is yours?
10K notes
·
View notes