#radqueer stance

[school-of-fish-system]

fishqueer!

(cant ID, sorry :( if anyone can ID please do!!/nf)

radqueer sublable with a focus on community!! not inherently pro or anti anything, just about finding community in yr stances :)

[sourisking]

how to avoid becoming/getting back into any harmful community

go offline (seriously. Online is not necessary)

block tags and block people. (Your online safety does not have to cater to others I promise)

Follow unrelated tags to drown it out (like art tags, Uhm… gardening?)

Get hobbies (seriously, distract yourself if possible!)

anyone else feel free to add on (or don’t idc)

Also: things like discourse can be addictive and detrimental to one’s health, remember to put yourself first!

uhm… this is probably not gonna get much traction but this is also kind of a me thing so yea :3

[nicollodangelo]

IMOQUEER

Imoqueer is a queer stance that focuses mainly on welcoming people who are typically harassed by moralists. The main idea is to question social constructs and discuss whether everything that is considered wrong by the majority is, in fact, wrong as they say. Imoqueer people should analyze reality from a material rather than a moral perspective and, in this way, have their own conclusions about the world and how it works, positioning themselves in relation to the rules and expectations that have been imposed on us.

Imoqueer also uses a lot of sympathy, trying to understand how others feel and supporting them and offering support so that they can improve, regardless of how bad it seems. welcoming many fragile people who are usually excluded and left aside due to their disorders and coping mechanisms.

Note that being immoral does not mean being anti-moral. The idea behind this queer stance is to question morality and sometimes oppose it in certain aspects, not to be completely against it. This queer stance may or may not engage in discourse for whatever reason. They are not obliged to argue with anyone they deem not worth discussing.

Idea for an identifying emoji: 📚🌈

pro

"controversial" identities such as lesboy gaygirl

ANY type of hetero and cisdissidence (includes mono mspec, multiorientation, cistrans, iso…)

non-monogamy and open relationships

transbodies and extreme body modifications

alterhumans

paraphilias, paraphilic disorders and fetishes (taboo or not)

CONSENSUAL paraphiliac contacts

sh and suicide as artistic performance (may include public suicide)

euthanasia, assisted suicide and others

autonomy over one's own body (includes abortion)

consensual c☆nnib☆lism

mad pride and anti-asylum, anti-sanism and anti-psychiatry movements

self-diagnosis / self-identification and any type of systems

destigmatization of unhealthy coping mechanisms such as romanticization of trauma

toxic, obsessive, ab_sive consensual and/or mutual relationships (conabuse)

proship and pro fiction / anti censorship

furry and other harmless communities

communism and anarchism

ACAB

feminism

paganism, neoreligions and fults

legalization of all dr_gs

blm and other racialized people's movements

RAISE in the age of consent (actually this one depends, because I wrote this thinking about the age of consent in my country which is 14)

sex workers

inc2st (consang or not)

encouragement of veganism

all transIDs

claiming and redefining slurs and offensive terms

MIK

shtwt and edtwt

MUDs

anti

contact of any paraphilia that is done in a non-consensual way

CSEM / CSAM

LSDqueer, basedqueer, kandiqueer, xenosatanism and similar

fatspo and any type of bodyshaming that is not consensual

bullying and harassment

conservatives, right-wingers, especially Nazis and fascists

terf, radgay, genitalists, transphobes, exorsexists, binarists…

religious bigots

more information below (if interested)

FUN FACT: where did the idea for the name imoqueer come from?

All the bullshit on my old twitter account (nicogoscared) started in a post where I criticized anti-para people and called them moralists - I have to admit that, partially, that word reminds me a lot of that BSD scene of the agency against the guild where Tanizaki protects Naomi - and even after months I still refer to these people that way. It ended up taking more than expected and, basically, it's common sense in my bubble to call people who are against the things I defend moralists.

Come to think of it, if they are the moral ones, then logically we must be the immoral ones, right? and I believe we should claim that label with pride, embrace immorality as part of our identity and struggle.

Creator of the term: Nicollo Miriel (me)

Date: I don't have an official coining post, but it was coined around July 10th, 2024

Flag: made by bambi (I don't know his current username) on July 21st, 2024

Original docs

[shitty-proendo-blackout-posts]

TW: SouP

[minecraftenthusiast2882]

Incurioqueer

A blankqueer label/queer stance where the motto is just "live and let live". "I'm too tired to care". The emoji code is (💤🔌). Not radqueer but not safequeer but not blablabla, it's nothing. You do not care.

Beliefs:

Ship discourse is dumb

System discourse is dumb

Queer discourse is dumb

Live and let live till they do something illegal

Research over emotions, facts over feelings

Allowing a safe space for people with all sorts of mental illness

Anti-harassment

[vocalux]

— partial disagreement - contact

a flag for individuals whose contact stance is pd !

[sage-thee-herbmaster]

Sagequeer

A Queer stance that emphasises on education and recovery. Educating others on the dangerous ideas that the radqueer community promotes, creating a safe place for ex radqueers, and encouraging those who want to leave to do so. Emoji Code: 🌿➕. Sagequeers support:

Ex/Recovering Radqueers (Obviously lol)

Harmless transids like transhairstyle, transprofession, transeyecolur, transage etc.

Dissomei, BIID and those with other forms of atypical dysphoria

Pro recovery, Paraphiles, especially Anti-contact Pedos, Zoos and Necros

Pro-Kink, Pro-BDSM, and Pro-Para

Pro-religion, so long as the religion doesn’t involve harming others

Trolling but only in self defence

Sagequeer is against:

Radqueer ideaoolgy

Transrace/transabled/transharmful and Consang

“Transitioning” to another race or trying to “become” mentally ill/neurodivergent

Harassment, bullying, doxxing and abuse

The sexualisation and/or romanticisation of dark topics in fiction (proship)

Pro/neu/complex-contract with nonconsensual paras like the Big 3, any para that would result in death or major injury

This stances is neutral on:

Mspec monos

AFAB Transfems / AMAB Transmascs

Contradictory Labels

Syscourse

[honeymicesquared]

〘 Hugqueer 〙

A blankqueer stance focusing on comforting and protecting others! Made with the idea to focus on those with physical & mental disabilities/disorders, but doesn't exclusively focus on them.

For: Respecting physical disabilities, respecting mental disabilities/disorders, respecting paraphilias (anti-c harmful), mspecs, mspec monos, aspec, MOGAI, all plurals, alterhumanity/nonhumans, recovery for everyone (including recovering radqueers)

Against: Demonizing disabilities/disorders, disrespecting disabilities/disorders, harassing, doxxing, thought policing, fakeclaiming, racists, bigots, radqueers, transid, pro-c harmful paras, TERFS, label policing

Not Heavy On: Shipcourse, syscourse

Tagging: @antiradqueer

[idqueer]

IDqueer - ✨🔎🌈

IDqueer is a blankqueer stance primarily centered around TransIDs. The stance is that how someone identifies or sees themself isn’t exactly harmful- how they act and express is.

PRO: TransID, Para, Kink/BDSM, Contradictory labels, Good-Faith Identities, Consent, Recovery

Up to individual: Syscourse, Shipcourse, ConAbuse

ANTI: Racist, Illegal Para Contact, Harmful/Offensive TransID transition, Consang, Harassment, Non-Consentual harm, CSEM

I made this due to the fact I cannot call myself a radqueer, but I fear I have too much nuance on certain things to be explicitly an Anti.

[hazard-consent]

Hazard Consent

[pt: Hazard Consent /end pt]

Hazard consent, or hazard-consent, is a contact/consent stance based on harm reduction, explicit and informed consent, and understanding the repercussions of one's actions. It is inherently against contact for any paraphilia, kink or fetish that involves a lack of, or otherwise dubious, content- *as well as situations where even if one believes a group or individual can consent, the negative impact it would have on either party outweigh what pleasure they could get out of it.

What is hazard consent FOR?

explicit and informed consent

harm reduction and understanding the difference between hurt and harm(link)

non-offending or recovering offenders, those with paraphilic disorders, moral OCD and intrusive thoughts, and those who want to have or participate in harmless contact

acceptance of every paraphilia, kink and fetish, and form a sense of community

fighting against ableism and sanism targeted at those with paraphilias, kinks, fetishes and other atypical interests, as well as destigmatizing them

engaging with paraphilias, kinks and fetishes with full knowledge of any risk involved and doing so as safely as possible

What is hazard consent AGAINST?

sexual or romantic contact with children, animals, or non/dubiously consenting adults, or exposing them to sexual or explicit content

contact for pedophilia, zoophilia, biasophilia, incestophilia and non-consenting necrophilia, somnophilia, inibriphilia(link), or anything else that can be pre-consented to. roleplay for any of these does not fall under hazard consent

attaching any inherent morality to any parahilia, fetish or kink, even if one personally think its "gross", "weird" or "immoral"

harassment, bullying, doxxing, abusing or otherwise unnecessarily cruel behavior to anyone of any stance

ableism and sanism

What does NOT fall under hazard consent?

when topics such as consent or boundaries are discussed beforehand, and can be revoked at any time (pre-consented to necro, somno, inibri, etc.)

risk aware consensual kink & BDSM

engaging in consensual roleplay, including CNC

engaging with objects or non-sentient creatures (plants, robots, etc)

anything not explicitly stated on the post

Hazard Stances

[pt: Hazard Stances /end pt]

One can express their stance on hazard consent through the typical "pro/neutral/complex/anti" system that is used for other stances. Ex. pro-hazard supporting hazard consent, or anti-hazard being against hazard consent. Anyone can be any stance for any reason, and is at their own discretion to explain why. Nobody owes anybody an explanation.

QnA

[pt: QnA /end pt]

QnA section to get ahead of any potential questions, and clarifying anything that might not have already been made clear.

Q. Why does this exist?

A. Historically, contact stances were something used in the MAP community to express one's personal stance on contact with minors, but now that it is used to indicate one's stance on multiple/all paraphilias, it has become unclear what falls under being "pro/neutral/complex/anti-contact". Meanwhile stances like "pro-consent" or "anti-harm" have a similar vagueness to them, as what counts as "consent" or "harm" can be subjective and up to the user. This is to serve a clear and explicit stance of things that often seems to be shared between these beliefs.

Q. *What does this mean?

A. This stance believes that, even if an individual thinks groups like children or animals can consent, the negative impact sexual contact with them has on these groups psychologically outweighs the pleasure gained. This also means that if an individual is distressed by their attraction, they shouldn't engage with it if/until they can do so without harming themselves mentally.

Q. What is dubious consent in this context?

A. Any coerced, unenthusiastic, uninformed or otherwise unclear consent.

Q. Why the name "hazard consent"?

A. "Hazard" is supposed to reference the understanding of the risks, potential danger, and, well, hazards associated with non/dubious consent, as well as those related to informed consent. It also is intended to invoke a sense of danger. It is intended to promote a thorough understanding of the risks and benefits associated with sex, consent and paraphilias, kinks and fetishes.

Q. Who can use hazard consent?

A. Anyone. Even if someone disagrees with me and my beliefs, or if I disagree with them. This is a term for anyone and everyone who shares this specific belief, and anyone can be any stance on it.

Any other questions, concerns or thoughts can be sent to @hazard-consent

[mistymeow69]

Evequeer

(COINED BY ME!)

A queer stance similar to post-radqueer signifying a radical support and inclusion of all identities that are not harmful or offensive toward others, and are done with careful consideration that they won't harm others. It's about respect for all living beings. As long as it makes you happy, who am I to say anything? Whether or not one is harmful toward themselves is their own choice, but this label encourages them to seek recovery if needed. The main ideas are "is it hurting anyone?" and "if it makes you uncomfortable, block them". It is mostly uninvolved with para discourse other than being exclusively anti or complex contact.

More info under the cut ↓

This label is pro:

• Queer, poc, disabled, women's, children's, animal's, etc. rights

• Contradictory labels (mspec lesbian, lesboy, straightbian, etc. AKA radinclus)

• MOGAI, LIOM, PLUR, etc.

• Non-harmful transids (transrace, transage, transspecies, etc.)

• Trans-harmed transids IF done with proper research, empathy, and consideration

• All good-faith labels

• Non-harmful paraphilias (anything toward non-living things)

• Recovery

• Consent

• Kink

• Empathy/sympathy, including toward people you don't like

• Fiction/fandom (including ships)

• Education and patience toward those who may not understand queer identities and transids

• Freedom of religion/spirituality (excluding forced, harmful religion and such)

• Endogenic, willogenic, etc systems

• IRLs/DAs

• Bodily autonomy toward ALL things

• MUDs

• Harm reduction

• Prioritizing taking care of oneself's health and wellbeing

This label is anti:

• contact, or complex contact depending on circumstances

• noncon abuse

• harassment (including doxxing)

• shipcourse

• FORCED recovery (encouragement is fine)

• Cringe culture (this label is pro-reclaiming cringe though!)

• Fake claiming/reality checking

• Label/thought policing

• most transharmful transids (transnazi, transschoolshooter, etc)

• transids w/o proper education (such as a transbipolar person pretending to have a good and evil persona or something rather than actually researching the disorder and empathizing with those who are born with it)

• aestheticizing/romanticizing/sexualizing etc. (things such as minorities, victims, living things who can't consent, etc)

• Censorship

• Transmeds

• Conservatism

• TERFs/radfems (yes, radfem is different from feminism, and yes, including KAM)

• bigotry (racism, sexism, queerphobia, ableism, etc.)

Extra info

(Extra info)

Etymology: ευημερία (evemería)/ευεξία (evexia) (wellbeing/euphoria in greek) + queer

Flag meaning:

- Brown: TransIDs

- Orange: Pro-fiction (including irls, yumes, darkshippers, and anything relating to fiction)

- Yellow: Plurals/systems, regardless of source

- White: Happiness, kindness, and the mind

- Pink: Non-harmful and non-offending paraphiles

- Red: Kink, sexuality, and consent

- Darker brown: Minding your damn business when you don't like something and utilizing the block feature!

- Heart: Acceptance of all identities and unity

-- Pink outline of heart: Unconditional love for everyone, supporting queer love

-- White center of heart: Forgiveness toward people who were once bigots or other "bad people" but later redeemed themselves, and empathy for all

[thetetrisco]

Reminder that :

- I don’t allow triggers to be posted at all . Positive triggers are still triggers

- someone else’s introjects are not “doubles” of yours , this reduces them down to being “source”

- Kins, coping links, kins-for-fun do not have source mates as you aren’t sourced from a media , you kin it / identify with it

- IRLs & DAs aren’t real as you can’t be aware of a delusion while experiencing said delusion . You can have a delusion you’re x character but wouldn’t call yourself an IRL because you would already assume you’re actually that character

- Radqueer “accept all” extremism is harmful when it allows people to make made up disorders that include wanting to literally abuse them , and pretending that doesn’t need therapy . As well as allowing Trans-ID’s such as “transautistic” which is just a mockery of people who deal with these things

- Contradictory labels/good faith is fine as long as they don’t follow RadQueer extremism

- Not using tone-tags isn’t ableist . Refusing to clarify your tone at all when asked , is

- Endogenics aren’t real , you can only be a system with a CDD (complex dissociative disorder) . They also participate in the erasure of spiritual plurality (which spiritual plurality does not equal a system)

[caracoldimi]

Cattusqueer

A blankqueer for beings who are not anti-radqueers and can interact with the community, but don't think they fully fit in as radqueers (for many reasons or not).

Cattusqueer is...

PRO:

• Paraphiles (including the big 3)

• Consent / choice

• "Contradictory" labels (mspec monos, gaybian, etc.)

• Endogenic systems(this includes willogenic systems)

• Kinks/fetishes

• XenoIDs(reclaimed)

• Xenogenders

ANTI:

• Fakeclaimers

• Ableism

• Forced transition / detransition

• Rivalry within the queer community

• CSAM / CSEM

• Abuse

• Harassment

• Xenosatanism

• LSDqueer

NEU / NO OPINION / PERSONAL PRO (NOT INCLUDED ON THIS BLANKQUEER PRO LIST) :

• Pro-fiction / proshipping

• Any other blankqueer

• Any contact stance

• Consanguinity

• TransIDs / TransX

[shitty-proendo-blackout-posts]

OCEAN 🌊

[redtail-lol]

Presenting, Enderqueer

[Image ID: 2 6-striped flags. They are the same flag, but the one on the left has an end portal overlay, which makes it darker with lighter rectangular speckles. Colors on the right's, in descending order, are: pink; light purple; dark purple; black; dark teal-blue; slightly dark sea green. The right has darkened versions of these same colors. End ID.]

My own blankqueer label. I've been wanting to make one for a while. Name and flag based on the End dimension from Minecraft.

Core principles of Enderqueer:

The core principles of Enderqueer are as follows

The right to self identification with little restrictions and rules.

Inclusion of non-harmful identities in the communities they say they belong to.

Respecting the identities of people even if you do not understand.

Giving everyone a chance to explain their identity before deeming it harmful; as well as respecting someone's choice to not explain and assuming good faith rather than passing judgement.

Putting experiences over definitions; allowing all labels to have outliers if they're comfortable with the label even when it doesn't fit them perfectly.

Queer liberation and the advancements of our rights.

Destroying heteronormativity, cisnormativity, exorsexism, intersexism, allonormativity, amatonormativity, and mononormativity (all 3 meanings of mono: monosexuality, monogenderism, and monogamy).

Enderqueer beliefs:

On identity, enderqueer believes the following

Most forms of self identification are valid, however anything that is identified with for harmful reasons (such as transphobia, biphobia/multiphobia, homophobia, ableism, racism, etc.) or things that are harmful regardless of reason (such as transabled, transrace for non-adoptees, transnazi, shit like that), are not valid.

It is okay to ask questions about identities you don't understand or think are harmful before fully accepting them without question. However, if a person doesn't want to answer, that is their right, and it doesn't give you the right to argue against or hate their identity. Assume good faith and maybe ask others who have similar identities.

Identity is complicated and every label, regardless of definition, can and will have outliers, and this is not a problem

Experiences and personal comforts are more important than definitions

All mspec identities are valid and are not biphobic

All aspecs are queer unless the aspec person in particular says they aren't.

All Polyamory, ambiamory, and other nonmonogamy is queer unless the polyam/non-monogam person in particular says they are not queer.

Redundant terms are okay

Multigendered and genderfluid people are "really" their genders. The existence of their other genders or the temporary nature of their genders don't make them less real

On paraphilias, enderqueer believes the following

Paraphilias are morally neutral. Paraphiles who's paraphilias are nonconsensual or harmful to themselves or others deserve support and recovery, and paraphiles who's paraphilias are not harmful should be allowed to act on it. Paraphilias that can either be harmful or not harmful should only be practiced in a safe and ethical way.

On flag discourse, enderqueer believes the following

Flags should not be gatekept from certain groups unless they are specific to one identity or one group of identities. people can decide to use your flags based on your beliefs.

Controversial original flags can be used regardless of if you agree with the creators, but replacement flags should not be used by people who don't agree with the sentiments behind the cancellation. Racist transphobes should not use the orange and pink lesbian flag. Mspec lesbians and supporters should not use the new pan or aroace flags. This is because the new flags have a goal: punish the original creator for a belief by replacing their work. Using replacement flags is accomplishing that goal, and if you agree with the original creator, you shouldn't punish them.

Multioriented and abrosexual people are "really" their orientations. The existence of their other orientations or the temporary nature of their orientations don't make them less real

Other things enderqueer believes the following

Queer labels should not concern themselves with non-queer issues, as that is a different part of one's identity. Making queer labels that concern themselves with non-queer issues excludes the people who are either uneducated on the topic or have no business voicing the opinion because they are not a part of the community or even adjacent.

Gender is real. Social constructs are powerful things that can cause real and observable phenomenon in the brain, and gender being real doesn't invalidate any funky gender identity

Gender Abolition is transphobic. Gender is the identity, and taking away gender leaves nothing but biological sex which may still allow binary trans people to exist if they experience dysphoria but will definitely erase all nondysphoric and nonbinary people.

Transmisogyny and transmisandry are real

POC queers are an unremovable and important part of the queer community

What does enderqueer explicitly support?

Enderqueer supports the following identities, actions, or forms of identification:

Unlabeled identities

People who use few labels for themselves

Termcollectors and labelhoarders

All aspecs, including loveless aros, any sex stance for aces, romance stance for aros, friendship stance for apls, etc, and atertiaries

Anti-contact, pro-recovery paraphiles who's paraphilias are harmful to themselves or others

Paraphiles who's paraphilias are not harmful to themselves or others

Paraphiles who's paraphilias can be harmful or can be safe who only act on them in a way that is safe and ethical

Mspec monos

Mspec gays, veldians, lesbians, cenelians, enbians, straights, etc who do not consider themselves monos

Straightbians, straight gays, straight veldians, gaybians/velaurians, and other labels often used by multigender people

Lesboys, turigirls, ceneliboys and ceneligirls, enbiboys and enbigirls, trixiboys and trixigirls, and toriboys and torigirls

Any other form of "contradictory" labels

Aspec and non-aspec SAM

Xenogenders

Xenidens, or xenoids used in reclamation

Allion orientations

Gender nonconformity, including pronoun nonconformity

Neurolabels, when used by people who have those conditions

Reclamation of slurs and derogatory terms, even when used as an identity

Transracial adoptees

Transspecies therians

Transage chronosian or transage age regressors

What does enderqueer explicitly denounce?

Enderqueer denounces the following identities, actions, or forms of identification:

Radqueers

Winterqueers or Winterpunks

Transidentities that are not transgender, transrace adoptees, therian transspecies, or chronosian/agere transage

Pro-contact harmful paraphilias or neu-contact harmful paraphilias. This also applies to unethical or unsafe ways of acting on a paraphilia that can be done in a safe, ethical way

Comp-contact for paraphilias that can never be safe or ethical in practice

Anti-recovery for ANY paraphilias. Nonharmful paraphiles may choose to recover anyway

Anti-contact for paraphilias that are never dangerous or unethical

Radical feminists

Not recognizing attraction to elsegender people as being just as real and valid as attraction to aptobinary people. This includes calling all exclusive lesbians monosexual, saying all sexualities inherently include elsegender people, thinking enbians are choosing to date nonbinary people or cenelians are choosing not to date aptobinary people, rather than recognizing that they are attracted to other elsegender people, potentially exclusively, or calling WLN and MLN labels transphobic or enbyphobic

Bad faith labels such as superstraight, quasihomosexual, animesexual (though animesexual can be reclaimed by fictosexuals), and others made to mock queerness or justify bigotry

What is enderqueer neutral on, or what does enderqueer not believe needs to be part of a blankqueer label?

Enderqueer is stanceless on the following:

Syscourse

Shipcourse

Self diagnosis

Furries

Alterhumanity (OP supports and it's close to queer discourse but ultimately I decided it was far enough removed that it didn't need to be included)

Engaging with problematic media and/or creators

Kink at pride (I know this one is super relevant but I don't have any strong opinions and the ones I do have are very mixed)

Enderqueers may have no opinion on the above issues, or a stance that they do not believe is important to a blankqueer label. Or they may just agree with everything else included under enderqueer and choose to use it.

[anti-rq-gumi]

Is it an identity or an ideology?

A helpful guide!

Being queer: Identity

Blankqueer stances: Ideology

Having atypical dysphoria: Identity

TransID: Both. TransID supports and encourages all transition, including harmful transition.

Being a paraphile: Identity

Contact stances: Ideology

While it isn’t okay to discriminate on the basis of identity, some common terms in the radqueer community are actually belief sets people hold.

It’s completely fine to judge a person based on their character. For terms that combine identity and ideology, criticism of the ideology part is still fair game!