kind of really sick of transmisogyny being so common on literally every online space i go to
this post has been inspired by someone talking about how sick they are of "exclusionists", that then goes on to include words transfems use to describe specific transmisogynystic behavior next to terms like "transmed" and "trender"
if you sincerely think that the terms transfems have used to describe the hostility (and notably, exclusionism!) fellow queers show towards us is equivalent to terms ACTUAL TRANSPHOBES use, then you need to reflect on exactly why you might think that
22 notes
·
View notes
It's human nature to gain or lose hope when you see Netflix socials promoting Byler or Midleven, but we've gotta pull back the curtain to see the full picture.
First, always remind yourself that the Stranger Things team and Netflix are completely separate entities. Netflix is the vehicle the ST team are driving their story on, but they're not the same people who actually create it. They get little to no say in what the ST writers write.
I say 'little' because the bones of each season will have been greenlit by select Netflix higher-ups (with NDA's signed). But if the Stranger Things team want Storyline A, and Netflix were to say no, what about Storyline B? Then the ST team are absolutely capable of standing their ground and not moving. Perhaps some compromises can be made, but the final say will be down to how stubborn the ST writers can be.
This was made apparent by the Duffer Brothers’ open stance on the writing and acting strikes, which directly opposed Netflix. It mattered to them that in the future, writers will continue to have control over their work. That Netflix can't just weasel out of their contracts with shows and write their own endings with AI.
Right now, Netflix provide funding, connections, and a platform to host stories on. The ST team provide their content, the original idea, the heart and soul. It's a mutually beneficial relationship.
When it comes to promoting stuff on social media, we have several teams working separately. This leads to exchanges like this from the Netflix Tudum event:
This is two completely different social media teams interacting with each other.
Most important to remember though - right now, the Netflix social media team won't know anything about Season 5. The earliest they may be told anything important will be at the start of the Season 5 promotional campaigns, but even then, it's not a given. NDA's will be in effect at Netflix right up until the bitter end. The social media people will be working in tandem with the marketing team, all of them given set content or working under guidelines when told what they can promote/ talk about.
Secondly, they're just ordinary people doing their job. When it comes to liking comments or replying to them, it will all differ depending on which person happens to be logged into the Netflix account at that time.
For ST5, it looks like Dana and Chris are two Senior Social Media Managers at Netflix US:
But look at all the related connections, and you begin to realise just how many people make up these social media teams (and marketing, which is related). And remember, this is just Netflix US - not the ST team.
So just think about how each person has their own opinions, has their own views on the show. How many of these people might ship Byler? How many ship Midleven? I bet they have their own interpersonal work politics behind the scenes, hoping their idealised ending is the right one.
My point is, there's no point freaking out about this occuring underneath Netflix US's recent post about ST S5:
All this shows is that we have a Midleven shipper in the social media team. After Season 4, a lot of people got excited at this:
But again, all this indicates is that we also have a potential Byler shipper in the Netflix UK team.
It's just as pointless getting happy and excited about pro-Byler stuff on there, as it is to get worried or upset about pro-Midleven stuff.
23 notes
·
View notes
//I just opened my tumblr notifs in a month and I'm soooo sorry for going radio silent on everybody's replies, IMs, and asks! I promise I'm not dead (and neither is Richard), and I promise I wasn't ignoring you, friends 🥺 I just felt pretty drained from social media during my break and decided to put notifs off for the month for my wellbeing, but now that my lectures have started again I oddly have some muse suddenly; and, most importantly, I'VE MISSED YOU ALL!
Again, I'm sorry for going completely AWOL on you dears, but I promise I'm slowly but steadily going to reply to all of your asks, IMs, and what have you between classes💕 I'm sending a gremlin smooch, sweets, and pastries all of ur ways as a formal apology 👀🥺💕//
10 notes
·
View notes
people who are excited or even just nonchalant about the us government trying to ban TikTok because "TikTok sucks anyway lol" are completely missing the entire fact that they're not trying to ban it because it "sucks", they're trying to ban it because our country is ran by 80yo xenophobic reactionaries who thinks China potentially selling our data is a billion times worse than Google openly selling our data. like can we not just brush over the fact that it's a baseless move made in an attempt to even further centralize and monopolize social media around America so that they can have full control over the data and freedom of expression of the entire fucking world just because y'all have a superiority complex about what apps you personally use.
I feel like some of you guys only think the government regulating social media is bad when its happening directly to you. very "the face eating jaguar party would never eat MY face" of yall to be anal about kosa but not bat a singular eyelash at an attempt to ban the only popular non-USA based/centric social media app left around. both of these things are actually because we live in a dystopia btw. both of them are bad. btw.
10 notes
·
View notes