#find your own arguments
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
Text
When your movement has no arguments so you have to cling onto other movements to give your movement some type of credibility
#radical feminism#radblr#radical feminists do interact#radical feminists please touch#gender critical#terfblr#feminism#transgender#transfem#gc feminist#gc feminism#gc feminists please interact#radfems please interact#liberal racism#women of color are not men#please stop coopting other movements#find your own arguments#racism
169 notes
·
View notes
Note
*puts hand up* sorry I’m very new here what’s the context with what’s happening with the tag war??
Alright, I will give my run down, but I will not be naming any blog names on either side even if I have the info and the action was net positive. I just like to use my blog to scroll and reblog for the most part and refuse to embroil myself in the drama more than just giving my view on it as a bystander. One that definitely has an opinion on the events, but also as someone who would rather curate my own experience than fight.
So all this fighting that is going on, it used to just happen in the normal "Jiang Cheng" tag because back then there was no "canon Jiang Cheng" tag; it had not been created yet. (By that I mean it was not a tag used as a tag, Tumblr's shitty search algorithm might still show posts if one typed it in to the search bar because those posts had the words 'canon', 'Jiang', and 'Cheng' in the tags separately, but there would not be posts with "#canon Jiang Cheng" because nobody normally creates a post with a tag like that when "#Jiang Cheng" was suffice. Sometimes I see irrelevant posts in the canon Jiang Cheng tag, but the actual tag isn't on the post, the tags just happen to have all three words in them. Those I ignore because that is Tumblr's fault, not the poster.)
The fighting was between people that like the character and prefer to see the good in him and the interpretation of his character, and those that may or may not like the character (just because you like a character does not mean you need to defend their every action after all) but do not share that opinion of his character and have a more neutral or negative portrayal by contrast. The former also tended to favor or have only read the novel as it is the source material for all other adaptations.
Now things really came to a head when hate and threats were being thrown about on posts that were just quotes from the book showing the negative actions of Jiang Cheng. The people posting the quotes were basically told "if you hate the character why don't you just tag the post as anti-JC?!" but is it really right to call those anti posts when they were posting how the character acts in the source material? That is the character. That is how he acted. Look it is in the book! The character really did that! It is not somebody's negative headcanon that the character may act like that, it is something the character actually did. Personally I can not consider that as an anti character post, and neither did the people who made posts like that.
But things did get heated enough that some people finally took a step back and said "Fine. You want us to make our own space to make these posts so that you do not have to see us talk about JC this way? We will. It will be #canon Jiang Cheng and you can block it if you don't want to see the posts." Was the name picked in the spirit of schadenfreude? Very probable, but it is also not an incorrect name as the people who wanted to use it base their opinion on the novel. But the point was that the tag was created so that people now had their own space to make the posts they wanted and those that did not want to see it could block the tag. Curate your own experience; we can block tags on this site for a reason and advertising tags to block is a courtesy. (Because as said previously, the search here sucks, because the posts contain the character's name they are still likely to show up in the main tag, but block the newly created tag and you will not see those posts either way). Could the other people come into the tag in good faith and make arguments with textual support? Yeah, that was welcomed, but in the spirit of debate they should expect rebuttal. Was that what happened? No.
No instead what happened was basically this meme
They did not like the name chosen for the tag. They read the novel too and still believe that JC is good, so they should be able to use the tag too! Never mind the fact that the tag was made so they could block the posts they didn't want to see. So that they can go on with their days no longer having to deal with the people they constantly fought with. No. Instead of curating the experience of this website, they would get so hung up on the fact that there was now a tag called #canon Jiang Cheng in use that they had to use it too to defend JC from the people that post 'negative' things about him; even if it is novel text!
So while the fighting didn't stop, it did get slightly better because not everyone felt the need to jump into the new tag to defend their fave. Some people actually did curate their experience. Plus there is a block button and people do use it, so things got to a point where I would say it was relatively stable even if there was still fights here and there. (But once again I lurk, I do not participate. Things may not have been the same for more outspoken people).
But then a certain muskrat bought Twitter and a chunk of the fandom there fled here. That's when the main push to "reclaim the tag" and the new influx of people hopping into the tag to argue and defend their fave appeared. These people did not know why the tag was made, they just saw blogs that they liked telling people about the "JC-antis" that made it and how with the new people pouring into the Tumblr fandom from twitter, they had a chance to flood it and reclaim it. And since then the fighting has not really stopped.
As for what has happened in the past few days, you have JC defenders flooding the tag with fan art (not canon), screen caps from CLQ (not canon), and screenshots of a sentence or two from the novel (canon, but usually out of context or lacking additional lines that go on to rebut what was previously said) in the tag and the people who made the tag for a specific purpose getting mad about the spam. (I block so I have no clue how big the influx was or whatever but there was definitely like at least 3 new people I had to block). So when they made posts venting the anger, you got JC defenders coming back to them and going "But I never sent any hate or harassment! I just used the tag to talk about the canon character!" And perhaps they didn't, but these people in their defense always ignore and never respond to the question of why they are in the tag instead of blocking it because that is what the tag was made for. Instead they come back with "Well if you want to talk about JC that way, why don't you post in the anti tag or make your own tag!"... Remember that meme picture I used above. Yup.
The tag war began because people did not like negative posts about JC in the main character tag for JC. When told to use the anti tag or make a new tag, a new tag was made, but instead of curating the experience the stans of JC got so tilted at the name of the tag that they decided that they would come into the tag and continue the fight instead of just blocking it. Twitter fallout made the fighting worse. And now we have come full circle to the JC stans once again telling people to just use the anti tag or make their own tag.
#canon jiang cheng#canon jc#this is my interpretation of the events I saw happen#Humans in a group suck there will always be some bad faith actors on both sides#but being one of the good ones by not personally sending hate does not absolve you from your actions#especially when you are invading a space that was not made for you that you were told to block#personally I laugh at the irony that the stans embody the negative traits of their fave by doing so#they take the same type of actions they excuse and try to use similar arguments to excuse their actions#exactly as i said at the end of my last post#if you come in actual good faith and understand the point of the tag i welcome you#I like the tag because it made it easier to find posts made by people who view JC the same as I do#I only read the novel#But yeah play stupid games win stupid prizes if you tell people to make their own tag dont get mad at the name and just block it
106 notes
·
View notes
Text
Looked up Edith Tolkien- to see if Lúthien and Arwen as they were imagined were baddies, of course- and was jumpscared by my own face????
THAT'S MY FACE !!!!
(Do not ask for the context of this photo I have none)
I do not know what to do with this information. Jonald Ronald R Tolkien would have been down cataclysmic for me. Characters in the legendarium canonically look like me. Something something fëa something something hröa. WHAT DO I DO WITH THIS INFORMATION??
#edith Tolkien#my own mother thought the first photo was a photo of me#this is worse than finding out I have the same exact body as Marilyn Monroe#this is not important information at all but it will not leave my brain#tolkien#lord forgive me for posting my face on tumblr dot com#i have better comparison pics obviously#but i only feel comfortable sharing that one#liv tyler eat your heart out babe#why do i feel like this should give me more authority#in insufferable nerd arguments about the lore
19 notes
·
View notes
Text
not going to lie, I think sooner or later some of you will have to come to terms with the fact that ALWAYS needing to completely relate and/or only seeing YOURSELF in the characters you read about/play as/watch in movies, can not only severely impact your critical thinking as a whole but also have very real consequences irl when you are suddenly introduced to struggles or issues you didn’t and maybe won’t ever face. suddenly your empathy is stunted 'cause you never really tried to put yourself in some else’s shoes, not even fictionally
#ari.txt#text#this is of course a generalization but still something i've found myself thinking about often#the growing obsession with the little things in fiction#restricting your reading to only 1st person pov#making ocs that only look like you again and again#choosing to engage with characters in an ensamble based on who looks like you the most#refusing to extend any type of curiosity towards people who are written differently who may be difficult to relate to in the beginning#all of these things on their own are NOT bad per se#but i'm starting to see a pattern emerging as of late and it got me thinking#especially considering we are living in a time where people are shamelessy using arguments that sounds like#what does it have to do with me / they wouldn't approve of me or my sexuality / they worship a different god / have a different skin color#to justify a literal gen*cide#i was hesitant to even post cause as per usual i hate to express more complex thoughts in english which i find severely lacking#but maybe someone else will find it even slightly relevant
15 notes
·
View notes
Text
"How come Orion was okay with Bee cutting people in half but not Megatron killing Sentinel"
Well you see there's a difference between killing someone in combat when they're actively trying to kill you back (self-defense) versus killing someone who's been physically disabled, can no longer fight, and is actively surrendering and trying to run away, hope that helps
#squiggposting#i mean the moral argument is basically that killing a surrendering enemy is not very cash money in general terms#but honestly to draw a real life comparison. ive studied use of force/lethal force laws bc i own a gun#and of course this is just a US standard that varies by state and ppl have lots of feelings about what's 'justified'#but even in one of the most gun supporting states (texas) you need to like. justify your use of lethal force#the legal terms/situations dont really apply to the situation in TF1 bc it's like. civil war vs civilian/civilian crime#but one of the legal contingencies to justify using lethal force in self defense is basically that there has to actually be danger#and even if someone objectively attacked you first. if you attack them back and disable them to the point they're crawling on the ground#most courts of law would not find it acceptable for you to pull out a gun and kill them (use of deadly force)#bc even tho you can argue 'they attacked me first' you cant argue that you were actually in danger at the time you chose to kill them#so like. legally speaking even in cases of self defense in the most pro gun pro self defense states in a pro gun country#if you use deadly force on someone who can't fight back against you and is no longer trying to attack you at the time you use it#you're probably gonna be slapped with charges. and if you dont get prosecuted criminally you certainly will be civilly#anyways. TLDR killing surrendering enemies is generally considered not very cash money even if they attacked you first
15 notes
·
View notes
Text
seen a lot of people saying that episode 13 is a spider episode, but am i the only one who sees it as a desolation episode? idk it’s just the cycle of the finance bro clawing his way up to ultimate fortune by losing everything else, and at the end of it all he doesn’t even get to keep his riches. he literally has nothing by the end of it, he’s burned every bridge, alienated himself from his friends and parents and completely fucked up his health. all that suffering just for one terrible loss, he got a taste of the top and it was stolen from him right at the finish line. life metaphorically going up into flames.
#the magnus protocol#magnus protocol#the web argument has good points tho#compulsion and addiction and honestly i think luck in of itself is pretty web coded#having to trust the one thing you are physically incapable of changing to guide your life#very ‘my will means nothing all factors are out of my reach’#but would the web honestly let people cheat it? maybe that’s why all the luck-based people die horrible on-screen deaths#maybe the web has shifted to chance#the fears have been reconfigured#i remember seeing that somewhere#maybe luck is some sort of desolation web hybrid fear#fear of the loss that comes with a complete and utter lack of control#and with the episode#it’s also lowkey a capitalism metaphor but i feel like i’d word an explanation wrong#man finds app that lets him profit on suffering of others#find loophole and hurts himself + those around him#app terminates him because he made money from his own suffering instead of ruining everyone else’s life#man destroys himself for profit and gets none of it
14 notes
·
View notes
Text
Genuine question why does so much of the jwcc fandom hate Ben and Darius as a ship?? the age gap is the same as all of the other popular ships in the fandom but that’s the only argument I’ve seen for it. They’re literally fine.
#jwcc#benrius#Ben Pincus#Darius bowman#camp cretaceous#also for the record Darius canonically turned thirteen on the island so the ‘two year gap’ thing isn���t even real#I genuinely don’t get it#they’re cute?? they have lots of screentime together and a really healthy beautifully navigated dynamic??#when I checked the fandom I was shocked to find it was a rarepair#does anyone know what’s going on there???#the only way to claim they have an age gap bigger than any of the other ships aside from yasammy#is to choose to believe that of your own free will??#if you’re uncomfy with a one year age gap that’s totally chill I get that and that’s so fair#but most of the people using the argument ship things with the same age gap??
92 notes
·
View notes
Text
#change your mind#beliefs#no arguments#you are ok#find your own path#have fun#enjoy life#leaving religion#leaving christianity#life after christianity
141 notes
·
View notes
Text
#avpost#despite my best efforts to make this hard to find. im still regularly getting bothered by non-arguments from bigots#but i still stand behind all of this so! transferring from text to photo to avoid the search system bringing active hate groups to my door#i at first did try to read the arguments but they were all so off base from what im saying that ive decided to give up#so for my own ability to not be annoyed. im just deleting all replies from now on. i won't even read them so do not bother#sorry. you lot had your chance to say smth of value and you blew it goodbye
19 notes
·
View notes
Text
Okay, if I had to simplify my gender into one song, it would absolutely have to be Libiamo ne' lieti calici. Like, I am going absolute feral right now. Do you see this vision of mine.
#trans#transgender#lgbt#lgbtq#ftm#mtf#nonbinary#i somewhat flip flop between my favourite pieces of opera but i LOVE how this song can be done#when it's done well i think you should feel almost seduced by BOTH violetta and alfredo's points of view#it is a VERY well-done argument alongside the chorus who affirm and almost seem to whisper alongside you...#...and (at least for me) i feel like i'm almost invited in a circle of people gossiping#i usually listen to pieces in isolation from the rest of the performance which does take the song out of context in a way#i think i just really like music (especially when i cannot understand it due to the language)#i find that people who listen to songs not in any language they speak they will enjoy it in a COMPLETELY different way#when you start understanding the song though you have your own interpretation of it that is often seperate from a natuve speakers#and frankly i LOVE that i am obsessed with it and i think we all need to find songs we don't understand and just LIVE with them#anyway feel free to recommend non-english songs and/or expand with your own song that you would say is gender idk!!!!
15 notes
·
View notes
Text
Those posts that are like “Americans don’t know geography and are so stupid and self centered” that are then filled with Americans being like “WELL ACTUALLY ITS BECAUSE THEY DONT TEACH US IN SCHOOL THATS NOT OUR FAULT” make me roll my eyes because like. If you don’t know basic geography because, supposedly, you never ONCE had a class that taught it at all, you should probably get on that. If you can whine on tumblr you can learn where other countries are and a little bit about them
But also as a certified American, I distinctly remember in my freshman year world geography class (a REQUIREMENT class we needed to graduate) there were ppl who dead ass could not even identify the state we actively lived in let alone countries on another continent and also completely avoided actually learning these things so maybe Americans are just fucking stupid and self centered
#that ‘argument’ always baffles me#cuz I’ve never met a person who wasn’t required to take at least one geography class in either high school or grade school???#I think maybe you ppl just didn’t pay attention and can’t handle getting rightfully criticized for think the USA is the only Country Ever#you might not THINK you think that. but the way you talk about/ignore all other countries#and try to blame it on a ‘failure’ of the education system is telling#because sure. the education system def does not address America’s imperialism and history as it should#but it DEFINITELY at least taught you how to look at a map and find other countries 😭😭😭#and again. you are fully capable of doing your own research and learning#which as a USAmerican you should def be doing so you can be Aware of which countries were affected by our imperialism and how we benefit#from that. which lets me real. is most other countries#idk idk. it’s just. y know. an argument that seems like a straw man to avoid taking any kind of responsibility for your ignorance#kaz rambles
6 notes
·
View notes
Text
Posting this here for receipts in case someone decides to steal this killer line of poetry I wrote for a spotify playlist description of all things (and which, together with the title, sounds like the heading of an essay that I would immediately want to read very badly):
#original#will wood#suburbia overture#playlist#I had to get real creative with the word limit because the third line got cut off on mobile every time#if anyone likes this enough to want to write an image description please do#i need to go to bed.#white culture#christianity cw#actively resisting the urge not to add all the catholic tags bc i KNOW that's a self-harming activity for real#if living in America hasn't made white Christians recognize that they have built their churches on the bones of thskr#*on the bones of their own botched divinity then this post sure won't#and then I'd have a bunch of people in the notes who want to argue but the argument always goes#- 'hey bud what about this huge logical fallacy in your own moral code?' - 'God said so.' - 'cool cool good debate everyone.'#anyway jesus is just a cop who puts all the bad people in the bad person hole - just like real cops.#there's a reason white christianity and white supremacy go hand-in-hand.#nobody's got a shorter memory for atrocities than the white catholic.#do you think we learned about residential schools at catholic school in my 99% white suburban township?#of course not! we didn't even learn about the crusades!! i learned about residential schools on tumblr at like age 27!!!!#fucking. chilling. that it took that long for me to find that out#i really really hate the culture i was raised in#our churches were filled with everything except divinity. - and also ANY people of color#in my 18 years of being forced to attend mass i NEVER saw a Black person in ANY of those buildings.#which is Fucking Weird.#I don't think I ever saw any people of color actually. i absolutely never spoke to anyone non-white before i was 11.#and i didn't have a full conversation with a Black person until i was like 16. we weren't okay.#there is a special kind of sickness to white culture that chokes out the soul of our own kindness. it's rank. it's rancid.#fuck your culture. i will exist in radical queer spaces til i die.#my parents are democrats btw. it wasn't a fundamentalist household. it didn't have to be.#we were told racism is bad but taught it was basically over. which is a great way to produce a shitload of racist white kids.
10 notes
·
View notes
Note
don’t have any opinions on it other than surface level skepticism but enjoying tigerdove is kind of similar to mothpool for me. is the age gap and power dynamics weird? absolutely. are both of them related? nnnnnnno? I don’t think so? also I don’t think tigerheart ever manipulated or hurt dovewing did he? I skipped all of po3 + oots because I don’t like lion jay or holly
I'm not really like. aware of the age gap or power dynamic you're referring to with Mothpool. The claims of them being related are also like....not true lol Sandstorm has no canonical family within the books, I still don't know why that's argued that somehow because of some off-hand comment the authors made that it is now suddenly akin to "shipping" incest. idk, I find a lot of the backlash behind Mothpool to be a bit manufactured but that's me.
Tigerdove though....def get why people don't like it and don't want to see it. They start off as friends and pair up when she's older, she cuts things off when he betrays her trust (i think he told his Clan something she said to him? either way the fact she can tell him to fuck off without fear of repercussion is good) and they get back together when he's begun to mature and repair that trust. Rhe presence of an imbalanced power dynamic isn't always equatable to an exploited power dynamic, Dovewing and Tigerheartstar seem to do just fine in comparison to, uh, another couple. but you know, obvious disclaimer, people are fair to not like it, i like their build up when they're older more.
#i know arguably po3 and oots dont add that much#but they do have like....very important events so i find it funny you just said nah and skipped it LMAO#but eh. obviously disclaimer#if you don't like mothpool for your own reasons that's fine#i just find like the aforementioned arguments weak as hell lol
16 notes
·
View notes
Text
I saw a video where Hillary Clinton blatantly lies and says there is a two state solution in Israel right now and Palestinians are in power and instead of using the money they have to build their country, they are using it all to attack Israel 🤢🥴🥴🥴💀💀🤡
The crazy thing is, since no one does their own research, I see the same exact theory in the comments of so many videos and posts. It really shows a few things- first that some people will not even do the bare minimum and will instead base their opinions on something they heard without having any proof, and two that politicians will blatantly lie. Just Blatantly. They are Not a reliable source of information they will say Anything to serve their ulterior motives.
#if anyone IS honestly interested in the argument#pls just Google the daily lives of Gazans- the israeli checkpoints they have to be interrogated at multiple times a day-#-sometimes to enter their own home-#the way israhell soldiers can station themselves in their homes and lock up the people in one of the rooms as they use the house#(former idf soldier interview)#the way they have walls and towers with cameras and have given bio-markers to track every palestinian#the way they can’t enter or leave as they please#there are streets designated as ‘no Palestinians allowed’#and these streets may even run infront of Palestinian houses#so they can only leave their homes thru the window#and being found on one of these roads can get u killed or arrested and tortured#literal kids are in the Palestinian prison system serving sentences for ‘crimes’ that occurred before they were born#and these are only a few of the things that prove that palestine is NOT in control of the Palestinians#feel free to research more#knowledge is power but it comes with responsibility#y’all are afraid of the responsibility so you prefer to live in ‘ignorance is bliss’#open your eyes friends. find the truth
10 notes
·
View notes
Text
are we really back to "oh you support (blank)? name ten people who (do/are) that right now or else youre lying for allyship points and everything you have to say should be disregarded". i thought we left that back in like. 2012 misogynist nerdbro culture
#i have seen it on two entirely separate topics lately and its like. hello?????#'if you cant name 10 trans authors off the top of your head you shouldnt be talking about trans issues full stop.#i dont think thats an unreasonable expectation for anyone wanting to engage in rational discourse' how about we all go outside#because like yeah i couldnt name you too many trans authors but given my transgenderismness i think i do in#fact still deserve a seat at the table. and i dont think there should be a prerequisite academic education level to be allowed to talk.#'but you could find them for free-' yes‚ you can‚ but people should still be allowed to a) choose what they read based#off of what interests them and not mildly-to-extremely dense nonfiction writing and still Talk About Their Own Lives And Have#Opinions#shockingly not reading a lot of one specific type of author doesnt prevent a person from having reasonable and valuable opinions#if youre not capable of parsing someones argument because theyre not well-read enough then that just imo means you dont actually understand#the things youve read to be able to give them a synopsis#this isnt school. we're not being graded. there is no required reading and you are perfectly capable of giving people an#explanation on your stances if theyre unfamiliar with them#i had a b) but i dont remember what it was‚ i think it probably was part of what i covered there that i thought was a separate thought#but yeah just like. idk you can just say 'hey i would really recommend reading xyz but to summarize‚ (thing that disproves them)'#it is not . difficult to either Explain yourself or‚ if that is not possible‚ Not be condescending to the person youre not willing to teach#for not knowing#ill stop there bc ive already done that ramble before but. yes#origibberish#edit: ok upon reread i got turned around and switched from addressing the less educated one conveying their arguments#to the more well read one#bc that was the b is i was gonna talk about both#yall get what i mean though just like. split it in half and flip it turnways
5 notes
·
View notes
Note
So with the hangout.. do you think that settles the issue of mistranslation or not of Kaeya and Diluc being brothers?
is it even possible to settle it? i feel like there must be some insane cultural difference between me as a western person and chinese people when it comes to adoptive siblings because, i honestly don't see how the biological son of the guy you consider your adoptive father isn't, by extension, your adoptive brother; how would that relationship not be familial? even when you bring in the "sworn brothers" trope as a means of queercoding, which is a concept ive had explained to me more than once – like, okay? i agree that it's true you can't properly translate/localize that, but. how else did you want them to translate it? even if the word brother was never used once in the eng translation, how do you make it so that kaeya and diluc calling the same guy "father" doesn't imply some uncomfortable things if he and diluc are romantically involved..? but then, who knows, maybe i just don't have enough knowledge about how censorship works in china, how they do queercoding over there, how they deal with adopted relationships, whatever. it's fine. different cultural upbringings, no? it's funny when it's the western side of the fandom discussing this, though. because you'll have these extremely white people arguing with you about the intricacies of chinese BL media. as if either of us knows what the hell we're talking about. anyway, none of this matters in the end because most klc shippers just... like the incest. and the day we stop arguing about mistranslations and simply accept that people either 1) see this relationship in a different light due to their cultural background or 2) are a little bit of a freak online is the day i will finally know peace as a kaeya fan
#i dont think this will be settled until we stop asking if it's settled. what if we just don't speak about it anymore#me: no i dont do discourse. sorry. *five minutes later*#first and last time i will spend this many words on this topic#and i hate the ''it's just fiction'' argument because yes. it is just fiction.#im not gonna come here and say this has an effect on real life. of course it doesnt this is gacha game yaoi#and i wont say that people aren't well within their right to engage with this sort of content either#i dont think it necessarily means anything about the moral values you apply to reality#i myself am into things in fiction that i find horrible in real life. why wouldn't i extend this same logic to proshipping?#doesn't change the fact that it's something i find weird and uncomfortable.#and that it's something that a Lot of people are going to find weird and uncomfortable#and that acting like this is just a regular pairing between two random guys is.. frankly really dumb#if you're gonna be weird about it at least own it! admit you're just into things society perceives as very gross#and tag your thing correctly so i can filter it out and block me so i never ever have to interact with you in my life#Okay. that's out of my system now. i apologize for posting discourse#complaining tag#askpilled#discourse
9 notes
·
View notes