#cw paraphilia mention

[burning-sol]

Btw, if anyone thought they were on my side or defending me specifically because you outed people in a gated server that I didn't even know about because I didn't purposefully go out looking for it (unlike you)? I actually feel more unsafe around you than the people in said server. I don't like you seeking out people's sexual fantasies and then publicly shaming them for their taboo fetishes they shared where they presumed it would be held in confidence.

I don't think you should be allowed to have your cake and eat it too. You don't get to violate people's boundaries and act like you are an advocate for victims. I just know you mfers are superficial and would drop victims and call them monsters because the very moment they show a sign of their abuse (for context one potential cause of paraphilias is CSA) they're suddenly "gross" and "give REAL victims a bad name". You don't get to state, "I really really care for victims and they should go to therapy to get treated 🥺" but also pick apart (potential) victims' messages and advocate for reporting them to the authorities.

Also yes, YES, it literally IS harmful for children to state that they are minors online because then predators KNOW who the minors are! Someone knowing you're a minor at ALL means that they know you are less developed and therefore more easily manipulated. They can message a minor and start phishing for more information, which a minor is more likely give up than an adult! Like, stating you're a "minor" IS more protection than outright stating your age, but y'all just have no clue what you're talking about.

In general, I feel like I'm going crazy. I'm surrounded by people who are all under the impression they're being moral but y'all are just ignorant and have no clue what you're going on about and you at worst you actively harm others. You guys SUCKKK...

[luxdraconia]

oh that’s a new guy. oh that’s a para holder.

not elaborating, good day

[crowpunkcognitivedecline]

okay im gonna "vaguepost" because this bitch blocked me and this is fucking pathetic and a great example of why you check peoples' blogs before assuming they're engaging in good faith

someone replied to this post starting with "not to be an asshole but," which is honestly the first red flag, but basically asking why i didn't want people without SCIs to advocate for us [which isn't what i said but fine]. i replied with an explanation that's still there, if you want to look at it.

now this asshole replied with something that took 3 replies but they didn't realize they'd delete all their responses if they blocked me right after, so good going there genius. luckily i know absolutely nothing you said had any value to it so who cares.

and then it occurred to me to check their profile and.

they literally just lied in their initial "not to be an asshole" question about having an SCI--they list all their health conditions in their pinned post and absolutely nothing SCI related is there. so, congratulations for stooping even lower than the rest of the ableist hEDSers with victim complexes

i'm on their DNI like 5 separate times; their DNI includes detransitioners & supporters [and yes i fucking support people who decide to detransition you absolute cunt], catholics [i'm not practicing but im fucking latino], self diagnosed & pro endo folks [because doctors are always right and disabled/nd folks cant be trusted to know our own minds and bodies], and "MERDs" [fuck off straight to hell you ableist piece of shit]

DNI also includes people with pedophilic disorders and pOCD and says "I don't care if you think you won't offend, I have enough experience to know better," which for someone who so strongly believes doctors are right about everything sure fucking goes against all medical/psychiatric consensus--and is also so violently anti-survivor, anti-recovery, and sanist that i don't really know where to start

anyway if you're reading this, random guy, you're a fucking pussy, go fuck yourself, and you're exactly who the post was about. i don't know what you were trying to do, but all you proved is you believe your disability and trauma excuses violent ableism against people with more severe or more stigmatized disabilities and that i was right to not want to hear your opinion, so, yknow, eat shit and fuck off.

this is a cripple punk post about intracommunity issues; ableds DNI

using my power as a bitch with both hEDS and an SCI to tell people with hEDS to shut the fuck up about SCIs

"some people have dislocated spines from hEDS!" guess what, i'm some people! you're not! stop using me and people with more severe forms of EDS as debate points, we don't fucking like you!

[proship-puppy]

Rarity x Apple Jack

! This post talks about NSFW , SA , Pedo/Zoophilia , R*pe , etc. THIS POST IS DARKSHIP ! Don’t like -> DNI 🎀 🎱

Apple Jack loves Rarity with all his heart…

However he also has a crush on someone else; his cousin pinkie pie. Well it’s not just a crush it’s a affair. Apple Jack and pinkie pie meet every now and then to make out and fuck. Sometimes pinkie even brings along one of her girlfriends (twilight sparkle or sunset shimmer) to r*pe them together with Apple Jack. It’s a dirty secret rarity should never know about…

But rarity has a secret as well..!

Every now and then she needs some extra money for a dress or pair of shoes she saw. So she meets up with older men and let’s them gang r*pe her. They pay per hour and can do anything they want with rarity so she did make some wild experience as they forced her to fuck with dogs or children ! But it’s all worth it and honestly she even enjoyed a lot of it because the r*pe is what got her to start a relationship with her loyal dog spike ! And it also showed her how okay it is for her to groom her sister sweetie bell every now and then. After all her needs are important to and if she needs to fuck , why not fuck her sister if no one else is around ? But of course Apple Jack could never know about all this !

🍖🌈 = proship

🧩🥀 = ex anti

💀🌙 = dislikes but still ships

[thedigitalwave]

Seeing that bitchy crosstagger saying "hey antis 🥺 dont worry those filtht radqueers will never be accepted into society!!" Is just. Well. Telling, raw and gross.

You know, it's really really fucking strange to me that people genuinely say out loud that a group majorly composed by minorities trying to be themselves will never be accepted into normal society. What is normal society? Your everyone-stays-the-same, divide-all-into-distinct-groups, never-let-mental-illness-be-normal society? Cause that's not normal to me. That's fascist.

I know I'm saying a big word there. I don't mean it in the "all antis are secretly alt-right" way. I mean "all antis are explicitly conservative in some way", though.

How can you propose us the idea that everything needs to stay the same, never progress, that minorities need to stay minorities and privileged people need to stay privileged, that certain people should stay in the shadows, and not be conservative?

By saying transid-identifying people should never transition, you're saying that. By saying paraphiles should never be accepted, you're saying that.

I hope you realize what you're doing now. This isn't protecting anyone. This is maintaining the status quo.

[super-secret-account-yippee]

CAB (C-orpse Attracted Being)

A coining post for a more friendlier term for ⚰️s to use! A CAB stands for a C-orpse Attracted Being. Alternatively you can also use CAH (C-orpse Attracted Human) or CAP (C-orpse Attracted Person).

The "-" in the word c-orpse is really just to help censor the post since i honestly don't feel like getting my account banned for something like this </3

[disabled-sysboxes]

[TEXT ID: this system struggles with paraphilia based intrusive thoughts]

[IMG ID: a teal rectangular box with an icon of a person's head with exclamation points coming out of it while they look distressed to the left, and the text 'this system struggles with paraphilia based intrusive thoughts' to the right.]

–

Like & Reblog if you use!

(Reblogs can be private)

[parasol-culture-is]

Being a CSA survivor with paraphilia themed OCDs with no genuine bad attractions irl but having intrusive thoughts and fears and at worst sometimes using fiction to cope is being afraid of being an anti contact (bad 4) paraphile in denial even though you’re almost only attracted to cute cartoon characters and barely find real people attractive, and you’re freaked out and disgusted by those actual paraphiles attracted to irl animals, children or corpses who want to be abusers especially. Yet still part of you wishing actual anti contact paraphiles weren’t getting abused, threatened and lumped in with predators, wishing more antis were pro recovery, and wishing antis weren’t treating survivors that aren’t “the pure and perfect survivor” like shit or parajacketing them, and wishing antis cared a lot more about CO/CSA and ASA prevention than just revenge and hate, and that antis actually didn’t make anti spaces unsafe for CSA survivors that aren’t even bad four paraphiles but aren’t “extreme enough” for other violent and genocidal antis. And eventually becoming an ex anti cause of other antis not caring about survivors or prevention, and finding out other antis have been outed as closet proCs/rapists and groomers themselves sometimes and being hypocrites.

para culture is

[bidmybloodtorun]

!! ABOUT MY BLOG !!

🔞18+ Blog🔞MDNI🔞

👋🏻 Hi! Welcome to my "degenerate blog"😁 Here you'll find the darker side of my mind, my darker curiosities, and my darker sexual interests. I hadn't realized, when I made this blog, what having a "secondary blog" meant. So this isn't my main, which is extremely disappointing now that I realize my mistake.

MY MAIN BLOG

⚠️Just a bit of a content warning. Like I said, this is for my darker thoughts, darker curiosities, and darker sexual interests. My bf and I are both heavily into BDSM. I'm a switch, but I'm a brat with him. I absolutely love pain. I get off on it. I have very dark fantasies, so there are mentions of: biting, cutting, knives, blood, slapping, choking, guns, marks, spanking, hickeys, bruises, consensual non-consenual (ex. r@pe fantasy & k!dnap fantasy), and other types of pain related kink tools. I'm a sadomasochist. I love pain - both receiving and inflicting it (all of it is consensual)! I may also post graphic images, sexual content and non-sexual content.

📮Submissions are allowed now! Didn't realize I had them turned off before! So ask me anything! You can ask about my sexual preferences, suggest books I might like, you can tell me something personal! Whether you tell me something personal anonymously or not, please be sure to include at the beginning if you're alright with me posting your "ask me⚔️tell me"! All other "ask me⚔️tell me"s will be posted! If you want it private, then directly message me!

🧠One of my intentions with this blog is for me to interact with others of a "darker nature". Personally, I am extremely interested in psychology. I'm a true crime consumer and have a personal-professional psychological curiosity for learning more about paraphilias (necro, cann!balism, etc.). I have a genuine interest in understanding different paraphilias & the minds of those who have them, their minds' correlation with human behavior & vice versa, and who the person is behind the paraphilia & what their life has been like. If you're interested in sharing your experience with me, you can message me or submit an anonymous ask. Please just make sure to tell me if you do not want me to post your ask. If you don't specify in the ask, I will not post it. Some may not understand why, but I understand that this is very personal info about oneself and a level of trust is needed for someone to tell me about themselves.

✒️Okay, so that's about it. I may also include some writing excerpts if I'm feeling particularly dark regarding what I want to write about that day. Who knows, I might write a dark story & post it here. If and when I start accepting requests, I will update this and create a specific post. Please let me know if I missed anything in my content warnings!

[thedigitalwave]

If you ever think the radqueer community is wrong by despising "survivors of the radqueer community", just think of Oli London.

He labeled himself as queer and was transrace. Now he hates queer people and trace people, says they're all the same mob of horribleness, and thrashes trans people because he's now christian and doesn't identify with those "beliefs".

Do you really think he was right? If yes, you're just a bigot, congratulations, but if not, where do you draw the line? At hating "actual queer people"? At hating "an actual minority"? Because I've never seen a non-queer radqueer. I've never seen a radqueer who's never been oppressed in any way. And with the amount of hate we've gotten, you can bet (and I know it's true) that a lot of antis are bigoted. I've seen antis be so straight up ableist while "fighting against ableism", I've seen them call radqueers the r slur and say horrible shit. And you can't say that's not a majority, I've never seen an anti who isn't conservative-coded and doesn't spew bigoted bullshit.

Because the nature of antis is segregation between binaries that don't exist as a binary. Disabled vs abled is not a binary, yet I've seen antis say that people can never become disabled, which is just stupid. As a white latino, POC vs white is not a binary I fall into, yet they really want to separate those and say people can never ever identify as something other than what they're born and perceived as.

They want to separate them because it's less confusing and less problematic. They want to maintain the status quo of never letting minorities become privileged as an identity (e.g. transwhiteness and nullabledness), and of never letting privileged people identify with minorities. Privilege or minority status will likely never leave us and we're not saying it will, but muddying the waters will never be something less than good. Because that only empowers.

In my humble opinion, saying disability and other minority status is desirable and inherently neutral or good, is not harmful. Because the other option is saying disability and other minority status is inherently undesirable regardless of how the disabled person or minority feels about it.

Anyway. I have said this multiple times, but having a distinct line between privilege status and minority status that no one can cross is not a good thing and will never be.

[tyrianluda]

im really out here researching about a hypothetical paraphila from a transphobic researcher. this is so fucking annoying

[disabled-sysboxes]

are people with other paraphilias/paraphilic that aren't the big three (pedo, zoo, necro) or objectively harmful interact or are you uncomfortable with that as well? /genuine

we are comfortable with those with non illegal / harmful paraphilias to interact, as we may have a paraphilia ourselves (although we arent too sure).

[girlsunny]

littles who are plagued by not sfw topics are valid!

cw: mentions of paraphilias, not sfw topics, etc etc

im suffering from pOCD and im SOOO tired of the purity culture the agere community has. agere itself isnt inappropriate, but some people have almost life-ruining disorders that can make it hard to regress without shame or at all.

littles with any form of OCD are valid

littles with intrusive thoughts are valid

littles dealing with shame are valid

littles with pOCD are valid

littles with iOCD are valid

littles with zOCD are valid

littles with soOCD are valid

littles with SA trauma are valid

you aren't and never will be a bad person or improper regressor for things out of your control. i see you.

[thedigitalwave]

I hope this isn't a hot take because I'm honestly tired of the antis that interact with me.

Accepting that people want to be more mentally ill and giving them a space to talk about it safely isn't predatory or leading them to mental illness.

An anti (a very condescending one at that) tried to argue that my stance on the anti community not wanting mental illness to be normalized (which I meant in a different way than interpreted, will expand on that later) is somehow the radqueer community grooming people into being more ill.

That's a falacy by itself. Normalizing something doesn't cause the thing to be more occurrent or more severe. That's actually a conservative talking point, that by normalizing things like queerness and social "abnormality", it will become a slippery slope where everyone ends up gay or "abnormal". Now, I do understand that this is a weak link. That person doesn't mean that normalizing mental illness will cause people to want to be mentally ill more...- wait.

Their point is that we are normalizing people wanting to be mentally ill and making them transition. Isn't that... Familiar?

Anyway. I didn't even mean it like that, but it is an interesting point. I meant by normalizing mental illness, that we should normalize paraphiles and other more obscure things commonly found close to mental illness (I'm not a medparaphilie by any means) and let those be common in society, so that people can get, you know, help.

I don't mean normalizing sexual abuse, which somehow this person took for granted.

I'm not even all for transmentalillness to be always meant towards a transition goal. I'm not for that for any transid. But allowing people to safely talk about their transition goals is not predatory, I don't know how it could be.

Well. That's all. I appreciate the reblog, dear anti, but I'm not impressed. Try harder next time.

[warmshotamilk]

"I don't support it in real life!"CW: talk of sexualizing minors, slight rant

Then why write about it? If for coping purposes, why post it online for others (especially actual predators) to see and consume? Then why portray those things in a positive light instead of condemning them?And you're seriously going to tell me that just because as an adult (1) you want to see a fictional minor (that mind you, is usually designed to resemble an actual child) depicted in sexual situations doesn't mean you don't share that same view concerning children in real life? You find fictional minors attractive but not real ones? Why does the line between finding someone who is (and usually also looks like) a child sexually attractive get drawn at whether the child is real or not? I'm not calling anyone pedophiles, but if the shoe fits...(1) No I am not talking about 18 y/os finding 17 y/os attractive. Use your brain. Creating content of underaged characters is still questionable regardless of age, however.

"Just mute/block instead of harassing others!"I have nearly 70k people blocked on twitter, and hundreds of words and tags muted, I softblock and mute people who post things I don't want to see. I still see certain things on my timeline, usually because1) It's posted in the main tags of something I'm interested in2) The post isn't even tagged at all3) If someone quote retweets from someone I've blocked, I still see the take on my timeline.

"Antis use the same rhetoric as exclusionists and TERFS!"What exactly does being against pedophilia have to do with trans (women) exclusionary radical feminism?And what does lgbtq discourse in general have to do with not wanting minors to be sexualized?

So much yapping only to send an absolute nothingburger of an ask. Like this was a genuine waste of your and my time to send me this

I'll still answer this but I'm going to put in about as much effort into typing my reply than it took you to type this out (not much)

Then why write about it?

Because why not? Who does it hurt to write about fictional characters doing fictional things? I'll tell you: It's nobody

If for coping purposes, why post it online for others (especially actual predators) to see and consume?

I am loving (hating) the implication of this that consuming/making dark fiction is somehow just as bad as a predator preying on someone. Spoilers: It's not. At all. It's frankly gross to even add that part

Not to mention that I would much prefer a pedophile* look at FICTIONAL shit than look at REAL shit because, and contrary to popular belief, it WON'T eventually become "not enough." It is a valid way of coping with paraphilia disorders

*I am assuming you mean pedophile when you say predator, completely ignoring the fact that not all pedophiles are offending. But, to cover this in case you actually DO mean actual predators... you are focusing on the WRONG THING if you bitch about a predator looking at fiction when they are harming actual fucking people

Then why portray those things in a positive light instead of condemning them?

Because it's fiction, Karen. It's fun to play with fiction. You can make a serial murderer a "good person" in fiction, too. You can make ANYONE a "good person" in fiction. It's fucking FUN to not have real world rules apply in fiction. You're just boring

Also, and I only want to mention this briefly because I don't want to trauma dump on a loser who can't even come off anon, the way I cope with fiction genuinely Would Not Work if it was portrayed in a dark light. If anything, it can sometimes make me feel worse and it's something I have to actively avoid. Which I do. Because I can curate my own online experience without bitching at other people to cater to me. Wild

And you're seriously going to tell me that just because as an adult you want to see a fictional minor (that mind you, is usually designed to resemble an actual child) depicted in sexual situations doesn't mean you don't share that same view concerning children in real life?

LMAO okay let me just really quickly bring more attention to the "is usually designed to resemble an actual child" and just ask you: Do you like lying? Because you're lying here. No, a fictional child is almost "designed to resemble an actual child," you just have a very, very, very, very, VERY skewed view of what a child is

Anyways, in regards to the rest of your question: Yeah. Because fiction isn't reality and what someone likes in fiction doesn't reflect what they like outside of fiction. Lesbians can have crushes on fictional men while still not having any romantic and/or sexual interest in real men at all. People can have crushes on fictional villains while condemning abuse, murder, and anything else of the sort. Those things are obvious, why is THIS the thing you draw a line at? Oh yeah, because it's icky bad in THIS case because you refuse to accept fiction and reality don't conflate in this way

Why does the line between finding someone who is (and usually also looks like) a child sexually attractive get drawn at whether the child is real or not?

Yeesh. Don't like the way you're talkin', bud. Having an uncontrollable paraphilia not inherently bad, it only becomes bad once that person is abusing, plans to abuse, or condones the abusing of real life beings. Attractions are not actions

Not to mention, comparing lolisho to actual CSEM is fucking disgusting. In one scenario, a real child is being ACTUALLY exploited and abused, while in the other... buddy, those are just lines. Pixels. Colors on a screen. Fuck off. No one is being harmed, THAT'S why the line is drawn there. The fact I have to TELL that to you tell me something about you and lemmie tell ya, the thing it's telling me Isn't Great For You

I'm not calling anyone pedophiles, but if the shoe fits…

It doesn't fit. You're like Cinderella's sisters with how y'all will try to be like "the shoe fits, it fits!" when trying to force the word "pedophile" onto people when the definition does not apply to them

"Just mute/block instead of harassing others!"I have nearly 70k people blocked on twitter, and hundreds of words and tags muted, I softblock and mute people who post things I don't want to see. I still see certain things on my timeline, usually because1) It's posted in the main tags of something I'm interested in2) The post isn't even tagged at all3) If someone quote retweets from someone I've blocked, I still see the take on my timeline.

Womp to the fucking womp. You are on the internet, you are going to see things you don't like. Hell, seeing shit you don't like comes free with LIVING AT ALL. Suck it the fuck up or off forever if you truly can't handle the few seconds of discomfort upon seeing shit you don't like. No one is going to cater to you. The sooner your come to terms with that the sooner you can start living a happier life. Until then, stop acting like an entitled prick. Poor you, woe is you, fuck off

"Antis use the same rhetoric as exclusionists and TERFS!"What exactly does being against pedophilia have to do with trans (women) exclusionary radical feminism?And what does lgbtq discourse in general have to do with not wanting minors to be sexualized?

Ignoring the fact I have literally never in my life compared antis to TERFs, nor do I really see ANYONE saying that, we LOVE (hate) when people lie! Omg it's my favorite thing!!! (sarcasm. if you couldn't tell)

You aren't "against pedophilia," you aren't talking about "not wanting minors to be sexualized," you are talking about how you don't like that fiction you don't like exists and how you want it to not only to be banned but criminalized. You are against freedom of fiction. You are pro-censorship. You are authoritarian. You are a puritan. Stop lying to make yourself look better

[vamp-luvr999]

Cw : sex talk (abt disconnect and asexuality?) + Kinks And paraphillia mention (Not in depth at all)

I Never understood The public’s obsession with sex… and I don’t know if it’s cause I’m Aroace or because I’m just disconnected from everything.

But i have My Moments where I’m like “it’d be nice” but not cause I want to. But because it’s more socially acceptable not to? Also I just don’t.. find it all That attractive traditionally

If anything, I’d want to practice my consenting paraphilias and kinks without sex? Is that even possible? Cause I just don’t find it attractive nor do I find it super tempting.

Maybe when I’m manic or perhaps when I’m having a hyper sexuality episode.. besides that? I just don’t Want To and i HATE when people tell me “u’ll be lonely” or “you don’t know what you want right now.”

If i cared abt that a lot more than I already do, honestly? I’d be 6 ft under lmao.. any more stress with that and I’d have a whole ass heart attack fr

Anyways yeah, sex sucks. Hate that shit. Let’s kiss and hug instead. << TL;;DR