#crime websites

[weirdly-specific-but-ok]

i might have found the most dedicated (brainrotted) good omens fan.

Hey y'all my beloved maggots, so in the spirit of having too much time and still recovering from my illness, your beloved Mascot was lurking on the lovely world wide web. I ended up, as one does, looking up what the fictitious '1810 clerkenwell diamond robbery' might have alluded to.

Of course I ended up with a bunch of tumblr and/or good omens results and then one bloody other search result. Which is what I'm sitting in utter bewilderment thinking about.

I'll link it at the end of the post, but to brief you on it, it was an article with an impressively detailed description of the supposed 1810 robbery, with the mastermind being (rather than Jane Austen, which is what I'd have expected the fake story to have) Richard Turpin. I didn't know who the fuck this was, so I looked him up, and found he was a highwayman who was executed in 1739 (there was a wee bit of bodysnatchin' involved, too). One of the diamonds in this article/story was also called the Star of South Africa, which when I looked it up, apparently is a diamond that was not discovered till the second half of the 19th century.

Which is all good lovely article impressive gonchposting but then I glance through the rest of the website and it seems to have actual articles about crime? I know nothing about stuff that happened after the Roman empire, so you are free to tell me about the legitimacy of the articles, but the fact remains that there are many articles, dating from July 2023 to February 2024.

I hear Good Omens season 2 came out on 28th July 2023, so this person set up an entire site in a few days, wrote an article with an anachronistic highwayman and diamond, and then proceeded to actually fill the rest of the site with articles? Am I in the correct timeline here? Has the internet lost its hivemind?

Please can someone explain this to me? Is this the final stage of the brainrot? Is this what I'm doomed to experience? Because if so I'm suing the entire Good Omens fandom, yes, you all, for infecting me with it.

Or have I lost it and I hallucinated this entire internet experience?

[hedgehogcryptid]

I’ve realized that the main reason I don’t give a fuck about Red Hood’s actual canon crimes is not that I think they’re justified, or reasonable, or even just funny. He has been shown doing very fucked up shit that at times has very little, if anything, to do with any reasonable moral code. But the reason I don’t care is that I’ve steadily become very critical of villain framing. It’s so very common to have a villain say something very reasonable like “poor people shouldn’t die” and then complement it with “and I will kill babies about it.” If the first statement is reasonable, and the narrative does not provide a reason that justifies the balls-to-the-wall batshit “solution” the character came up with, then I assume the author is either deliberately or subconsciously villainizing a specific group of people for no reason, and I don’t vibe with that. At that time I no longer care about what the author/narrative actually has to say and my reaction becomes “the narrator is actually a biased witness and anything they say about this person’s actions should be taken as exaggeration”. Oh, so Jason is an indiscriminate killer who thinks every petty criminal deserves to die? Wrong. They’re exaggerating and taking the facts out of context. So he killed a hundred people in prison with barely any provocation? It probably wasn’t that many and the ones he did were trying to kill him to begin with, with no intervention from the guards, so it was self defense. He attempted to kill a child? Wrong, that was a two-sided fight between two teenagers, he just won so the other one’s bitter. Like, I don’t care how much made up context I need to stuff in there to make it make sense, I will do it because the narrative decided to frame the homeless kid from a poor neighborhood as the villain against the nice and kindhearted humanitarian billionaire so its logic is fucked from the get-go

[ytcomments-archive]

[nyancrimew]

Can I pay you to hack the apex legends servers?

no

[gl1tchr]

I just remembered one of my FAVORITE FAVORITE FAVORITE details in Batman. After Riddler is captured and they have his website pulled up, on a movie screen it's basically impossible to read the smaller text, but ONCE IT CAME TO STREAMING, YOU COULD.

I KNOW it seems impossible to tell, but on a big TV SCREEN you can read this text, and it says "lets take a poll... does he deserve it? if yes - feelsgoodman.jpeg, if no, feelsbadman.jpeg"

I FOUND THIS SO. SO FASCINATING when I first saw it, I was interested in the politics of the people who followed Riddler in-universe and this confirmed my theory that Riddler/Edward is apolitical, he's not "left" or "right". He's this phenomenon of severely troubled young men who are sort of apolitically disillusioned, they don't really care about POLITICS, they care about themselves and use populist language to express that because men often find it difficult to express emotions - the normal way. BUT. His FOLLOWERS aren't the same. They DO have a political leaning, and I think it leans right, and the use of PEPE-POSTING TO EXPRESS THIS IS SO. SO INTERESTING

[warpedwings]

Misha Collins and Jensen Ackles through the years before Supernatural.

2005

Misha in CSI: Crime Scene Investigation.

Jensen in Devour.

2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996 1995 1994 1992 1991 1990 1987/1989 1985 1982 1978

[chinzhilla]

By the way, I don't mind if you also adopt my method. You'll know right away whether you two are made for each other.

[transrevolutions]

it always makes me roll my eyes when progressive liberals on here accuse more radical activists of spending all their time posting and not doing any direct action irl. like do they not get that the kind of action that radical leftists generally do irl is usually not safe to talk about online publicly??? do they want people to fucking incriminate themselves??? what is this the fbi

[botanicallyinclinednerd]

Deep Space Nine comits SO many war crimes

[batsplat]

Yes with these names, Pedrosa, Marquez and Stoner amazed me. And Rossi, obviously. Pedrosa was very strong in 125 and 250, because with his stature he had an incredible technique. Above all he took advantage of his weight a lot - as they say, in the pick up of the bike, which was very difficult and he was the first to do it like that. After all we copied him with the technique. Marquez is a beast here (points at head), and the only rider that... I wouldn't tell you that he likes to fall, because nobody likes to fall, but he wasn't afraid of falling. And he was like a pit bull - he always wanted to win, even if he wasn't comfortable on a circuit, even if the bike wasn't going well... He had an unconventional ambition, he always wanted to beat you. He believed in the falls, but he wasn't afraid of falling. So in that sense he is unique. Stoner was a natural talent, unconventional. For example, when the track was wet, with patches of water - he took it on, came out of the box, delivered the track record, took two or three seconds off everyone. So an improvisation and an ability to see the limit of the track immediately, incredible. What a natural talent. Either you have it or you don't. Valentino? Very complete. A person... as a person, naturally very intelligent, very charismatic. A great braker, a rider who could improvise a lot with the bike. When he was racing, [even when tired, with an elevated pulse], he was very lucid. Very complete. He didn't have a super quality… How would I say? (Interviewer: Any [outstanding] quality.) Yes, but it was all very complete.

Jorge Lorenzo on his rivals (x)

[fiona-fififi]

"Why doesn't their side call out the bad behavior they accuse us of??"

Because they've blocked all the crazies on their side and aren't seeing it. Just like you're not seeing all the bullshit on your side because you've blocked all the crazies over there, too.

Also, they ARE calling it out. You just have everyone on the other side blocked, so you aren't seeing the callouts.

Like jesus fucking christ, can we stop generalizing giant portions of fandom based on the behavior of the worst fucking people in them?? Because I promise you, whether you are seeing it or not, there are really fucking shitty people in ALL corners of fandom.

[stealingyourbones]

I keep on being told I should post my food crimes to r/shittyfoodporn (I think that’s the right subreddit) but I don’t have enough karma because I don’t touch Reddit. Alas.

[theonekierce]

"Yet it was whispered in the school that he was in the habit of parading the town at night in loud checks and a false beard. It was whispered, and disbelieved. I alone knew it for a fact; for night after night had I pulled the rope up after him when the rest of the dormitory were asleep, and kept awake by the hour to let it down again on a given signal." -The Ides of March

[ohsalome]

Russia is bombing idlib now please share 🇸🇾 #freesyria

(video source @FARED_ALHOR on twitter) (also a really good source on the situation in Syria in general)

From what I understand, russia together with the Assad regime have been heavily bombing civillians around Idlib, Kansafra, Al-Fatira, Kafr-Awaid while the people have been organising mass protests against the regime. Their methods are cowardly and abominable, and russians have a long history of specifically targeting hospitals and evacuation teams in Syria.

Aside from spreading the information, I urge people to look into if there are any local solidarity organisations that you can lend your hand to. I particularly know there is an upcoming march in Dublin

My heart goes out to you 💔 🇸🇾 #freesyria

[dr-james-wilson-oncologist]

r u sure...idk a lot of people telling you youre gay is a little suspicious...i dont think theyd do it without reason...

Are you kidding me? This website is the gayest I’ve ever been on. It’s like Grindr the sequel. Of course people think I’m gay.

[even-more-nonsense]

Surely it’s a normal speed run right?

@bwobgames