#RNA-binding protein

[medicomunicare]

L'immunità che dialoga costantemente col cervello: il ruolo segreto di C1q nel cervello che matura ed invecchia

Uno studio innovativo condotto presso il laboratorio di Beth Stevens, PhD, presso il Boston Children’s Hospital, ha rivelato che una proteina immunitaria influisce sulla sintesi proteica neuronale nel cervello che invecchia. Un precedente lavoro del laboratorio Stevens aveva scoperto che le cellule immunitarie nel sistema nervoso centrale, la microglia, aiutano a sfoltire le sinapsi nel cervello…

[netbiopub]

Multi-omics characterization of RNA binding proteins reveals disease comorbidities and potential drugs in COVID-19. Pan et al., Comput Biol Med. 2023 Mar; 155: 106651.

[literaryvein-reblogs]

Hello! First of all, thank you for the wonderful content! It's a real joy, and an enrichment, food for both the brain and the heart! I was wondering if through your treasures, you could find some writing notes/words/concepts/vocabulary relating to genetic engineering? Like...creating a virus, and a vaccine for it, modifying the virus so it has certain specific effects.... Thank you in advance!

Writing Notes: Virus & Vaccine

References How Viruses Work; Replication Cycle; Mutation, Variants, Strains, Genetically Engineering Viruses; Writing Tips; Creating your Fictional Virus & Vaccine

Virus - an infectious microbe consisting of a segment of nucleic acid (either DNA or RNA) surrounded by a protein coat.

It is a tiny lifeform that is a collection of genes inside a protective shell. Viruses can invade body cells where they multiply, causing illnesses.

It cannot replicate alone; instead, it must infect cells and use components of the host cell to make copies of itself. Often, a virus ends up killing the host cell in the process, causing damage to the host organism.

Well-known examples of viruses causing human disease include AIDS, COVID-19, measles and smallpox. Examples of viruses:

Viruses are even smaller than bacteria and can invade living cells—including bacteria. They may interfere with the host genes, and when they move from host to host, they may take host genes with them.

Bacteriophages (also known as phages)—viruses that infect and kill bacteria.

Size differential between virus and bacterium

Viruses are measured in nanometers (nm).

They lack the cellular structure of bacteria, being just particles of protein and genetic material.

How Viruses Work

Viruses use an organism’s cells to survive and reproduce.

They travel from one organism to another.

Viruses can make themselves into a particle called a virion.

This allows the virus to survive temporarily outside of a host organism. When it enters the host, it attaches to a cell. A virus then takes over the cell’s reproductive mechanisms for its own use and creates more virions.

The virions destroy the cell as they burst out of it to infect more cells.

Viral shedding - when an infected person releases the virus into the environment by coughing, speaking, touching a surface, or shedding skin.

Viruses also can be shed through blood, feces, or bodily fluids.

Virus Replication Cycle

While the replication cycle of viruses can vary from virus to virus, there is a general pattern that can be described, consisting of 5 steps:

Attachment – the virion attaches to the correct host cell.

Penetration or Viral Entry – the virus or viral nucleic acid gains entrance into the cell.

Synthesis – the viral proteins and nucleic acid copies are manufactured by the cells’ machinery.

Assembly – viruses are produced from the viral components.

Release – newly formed virions are released from the cell.

Mutations, Variants, and Strains

Not all mutations cause variants and strains. Below are definitions that explain how mutations, variants, and strains differ.

Mutation - errors in the replication of the virus’s genetic code; can be beneficial to the virus, deleterious to the virus, or neutral

Variants - viruses with these mutations are called variants; the Delta and Omicron variants are examples of coronavirus mutations that cause different symptoms from the original infection

Strains - variants that have different physical properties are called strains; these strains may have different behaviors or mechanisms for infection or reproduction

Genetically Engineering Viruses

Using reverse genetics, the sequence of a viral genome can be identified, including that of its different strains and variants.

This enables scientists to identify sequences of the virus that enable it to bind to a receptor, as well as those regions that cause it to be so virulent.

Vaccine - a special preparation of substances that stimulate an immune response, used for inoculation

Vaccines & Fighting Viruses with Viruses

Common pathogenic viruses can be genetically modified to make them less pathogenic, such that their virulent properties are diminished but can still be recognized by the immune system to produce a robust immune response against. They are described as live attenuated.

This is the basis of many successful vaccines and is a better alternative than traditional vaccine development which typically includes heat-mediated disabling of viruses that tend to be poorer in terms of immunogenicity.

Viruses can also be genetically modified to ‘fight viruses’ by boosting immune cells to make more effective antibodies, especially where vaccines fail. Where vaccines fail, it is often due to the impaired antibody production by B-cells, even though antibodies can be raised against such viruses – including HIV, EBV, RSV & cold-viruses.

Related Articles: Modified virus used to kill cancer cells ⚜ Genetic Engineering ⚜ Engineering Bacterial Viruses ⚜ Benefits of Viruses

A Few Writing Tips

As more writers look to incorporate infectious diseases into their work, there are quite a few things writers should keep in mind:

Don’t anthropomorphize. Really easy to do, but scientifically wrong. Viruses don’t want to kill you; bacteria don’t want to infect you; parasites don’t want to make your blood curdle. None of these things are big enough to be sentient to want to do anything. They just do it (or don’t do it).

Personal protective equipment. This includes wearing gloves, lab coats, safety glasses, and tying your hair back if it’s long. It is the same as Edna Mode’s “no capes.” Flowing hair looks cool all the way to the explosive ball of flames that engulfs someone’s head.

Viruses are small. You can’t see viruses down a normal microscope—they need a special microscope called an electron microscope. These are highly specialized and take a long time to make the preparations to be able to see the virus. Normally viruses are detected by inference—measuring part of them using an assay that can amplify tiny amounts of material, for example PCR.

Viruses don’t really cause zombie apocalypses. 

Vaccines work. But they take time. The best vaccine in the world will still only prevent infections two weeks after it is given. Drugs are quicker, but still take some time. But the good news is an infection is not going to kill you (or turn you into a zombie) quickly, so they both have time to work.

Scientists use viruses as a vector to introduce healthy genes into a patient’s cells:

Your Fictional Virus & Vaccine

When creating your own fictional virus, research further on the topic and consider choosing a specific one as your basis/inspiration.

Here's one resource. For some of them, you'll need a subscription to access, but those that are available give you a good overview of the virus, as well as treatment options.

You can do the same for creating your fictional vaccine:

Here's one resource. And here's one on vaccine developments.

Sources: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 ⚜ Writing Notes & References

Lastly, here's an interesting article on how science fiction can be a valuable tool to communicate widely around pandemic, whilst also acting as a creative space in which to anticipate how we may handle similar future events.

Thanks so much for your kind words, you're so lovely! Hope this helps with your writing. Would love to read your work if it does :)

[hellsite-proteins]

I LOVE THIS BLOG… would you be able to explain the stuff you’re doing to someone who knows nothing about proteins? all I can remember is something to do with dna ..?

of course! ill do my best to give an entry level crash course here, but if any of this is unclear please leave a comment or send an ask so i can better explain.

DISCLAIMER: all of this has been simplified, and because biology is messy, there are exceptions to pretty much everything i've said. the point is not to give a perfect explanation, but rather a general understanding

the central dogma of molecular biology is pretty much our version of "the mitochondria is the powerhouse of the cell", and since you've alluded to it already, i'll start there. it states that genetic information goes from DNA to RNA to proteins. inside of almost any cell is DNA, which codes for all of the genetic information allowing the cell to function. for our purposes right now, just think of DNA as an instruction manual. when a protein is going to be made, the part of the DNA sequence encoding it is copied over to make a RNA sequence.

RNA is structurally similar to DNA, but while DNA is usually found as a double helix (with two complementary strands), RNA is more often single stranded. it is less stable than DNA, so it does not work as well for long term information storage, but is smaller and can cary out numerous crucial functions.

prokaryotes are things like bacteria, and are distinct from eukaryotes (which includes us) because they lack a nucleus. this means that their DNA is loose inside their cell, rather than sectioned away. in prokaryotes, transcription (which copies information from DNA -> RNA) and translation (which is the process of going from RNA -> proteins) can happen at the same time, while in eukaryotes these processes are separated, as DNA is too large to leave the nucleus. messenger RNA (mRNA) is the specific type of RNA used to code for proteins in all cells. inside a eukaryotic cell, mRNA must be processed to increase its stability and allow it to exit the nucleus.

now, getting to the part about proteins! proteins are made through a process called translation, which translates the information stored using a sequence of nucleic acids on RNA to a string of amino acids known as a protein. each set of three nucleic acids, which on mRNA can be A, U, C or G, makes up the codon for one amino acid. the code is referred to as 'degenerate', since there is a lot of redundancy built in and so some information is lost along the way. there are more possible codons than there are amino acids, and so there is a lot of overlap with several codons coding for the same amino acid.

translation is accomplished using organelles known as ribosomes. these bind to the relevant RNA sequence and help join together the amino acids that are encoded by their sequence, forming peptide bonds. this is done using another specialized type of RNA called a transfer RNA (tRNA), which sticks temporarily to the three-letter codon on the mRNA and carries the corresponding amino acid to the ribosome so that it can be joined with the others in the sequence. all proteins start with the same codon (AUG), and subsequent amino acids are added one at a time. RNA and proteins both have directionality, which means that the two different ends of these molecules are not the same, and the direction you read the sequence in matters.

as a protein is assembled, the N terminal end is put together first, and so this part exits the ribosome while the rest is still being built. at this point, it comes in contact with the liquid inside the cell, and starts to bend itself into different shapes in order to make the most thermodynamically stable structure. this happens spontaneously, and is an effort to minimize the free energy of the protein and the surrounding water molecules. basically, everything wants to be in a state that requires as little energy as possible, and will fold itself to get there. think of this as a similar process to getting home after a long day, and trying to make yourself comfortable as fast as possible. protein folding is the equivalent to you taking off your jeans and lying down on your couch.

the thing is, proteins are complicated, and they need to fold quickly, because the inside of a cell is crowded and chaotic. the way they fold is influenced by several different factors, including how fast translation takes place and whether anything else is nearby to help them fold correctly. proteins do countless different highly specific things in any given cell, and their ability to function is based entirely around their structure. just like how you probably have numerous different tools in your home made of plastic, but each one is a different shape and therefore does something unique. if someone came along and melted your plastic cups until they were completely deformed, they wouldn't be of much use.

the primary structure of a protein is its amino acid sequence, and the secondary structure is made by interactions between nearby backbone atoms, but the tertiary structure is the main thing you'll see looking at any real protein structure. it is the combination of interactions between all the atoms within one amino acid chain. if this gets damaged (which can happen with things like heat and strong chemicals), the protein is said to be denatured. some proteins also have a quaternary structure, which is formed as different folded chains of amino acids each making up one subunit assemble together to make a bigger, more complicated protein.

whether they folded wrong from the start (like your plastic cup getting made with a hole in the bottom at the factory) or they started off fine but then got broken (like your plastic cup melting after you leave it on the hot stove), misfolded proteins are the wrong shape and therefore cannot perform their function correctly. these can do a lot of damage in an organism, and are generally a waste of resources to keep around, so they get destroyed and their parts are recycled.

hope this helps!

letter sequence in this ask matching protein-coding amino acids:

ILVETHISLGwldyealeteplainthestffyredingtsmenewhknwsnthingatprteinsallIcanrememerissmethingtdwithdna

protein guy analysis:

this protein is strange, terrible and filled with holes! just like many of the other structures, the myriad of loops want nothing to do with each other, and everything is all over the place. this whole structure is disordered and likely wiggling around trying to find something else to stick to and mess with. just a toxic trainwreck that should never have existed.

predicted protein structure:

[transgenderer]

Poliovirus is composed of an RNAgenome and a proteincapsid. The genome is a single-stranded positive-sense RNA (+ssRNA) genome that is about 7500 nucleotides long.[2] The viral particle is about 30 nm in diameter with icosahedral symmetry. Because of its short genome and its simple composition—only RNA and a nonenveloped icosahedral protein coat that encapsulates it—poliovirus is widely regarded as the simplest significant virus.[3]

7500 nucleotides is blowing my mind. did some more reading and found this

The MS2 genome is one of the smallest known, consisting of 3569 nucleotides of single-stranded RNA.[3] It encodes just four proteins: the maturation protein (A-protein), the lysis (lys) protein, the coat protein (cp), and the replicase (rep) protein.[1] The gene encoding lys overlaps both the 3'-end of the upstream gene (cp) and the 5'-end of the downstream gene (rep), and was one of the first known examples of overlapping genes. The positive-stranded RNA genome serves as a messenger RNA, and is translated upon viral uncoating within the host cell. Although the four proteins are encoded by the same messenger/viral RNA, they are not all expressed at the same levels.

only 4 genes!!! and the lysis one is fully contained in two other ones

Once the viral RNA has entered the cell, it begins to function as a messenger RNA for the production of phage proteins. The gene for the most abundant protein, the coat protein, can be immediately translated. The translation start of the replicase gene is normally hidden within RNA secondary structure, but can be transiently opened as ribosomes pass through the coat protein gene. Replicase translation is also shut down once large amounts of coat protein have been made; coat protein dimers bind and stabilize the RNA "operator hairpin", blocking the replicase start. The start of the maturation protein gene is accessible in RNA being replicated but hidden within RNA secondary structure in the completed MS2 RNA; this ensures translation of only a very few copies of maturation protein per RNA. Finally, the lysis protein gene can only be initiated by ribosomes that have completed translation of the coat protein gene and "slip back" to the start of the lysis protein gene, at about a 5% frequency.[1]

it had the first gene sequenced and the first full genome sequenced

[consult-sherlockholmes]

Hello, Mr. Holmes! How are you?

So, long story short, I ended up with an optical microscope in my room more or less 4 months ago, with 200 previously made slides (secured in a proper box), and lots of new ones too, for me to prepare myself. I love microbiology (it's one of my hyperfixations, curse my neurodivergency) and now I love it even more (my mother has had to drag me away from the microscope - I named it Wesley - in the middle of the night multiple times now).

After much conversation, I finally convinced my mom to buy me the proper equipment to prepare the slides!

So, I'm sending this ask to you, as I know you also have a microscope and that you use it a lot: what kind of equipment do you recommend me buying (gloves, scalpel blades, tints, etc), while still remembering that all of the stuff needs to stay in my room (properly taken cared of by me, of course)?

For example, I'm unsure if different dyes are used for different smears and specimens due to it's affinity (I've noticed that on 'organic matter' slides, images are usually tinted purple or pink, while on plant-based slides, images are usually tinted green and blue, with a few red structures.) Considering that I don't have access to a mortuary, I will mostly make plant slides. There must be a difference in the dyes then, right?

Sorry for the long text! Hope this isn't too much of a bother.

- a 17-year-old :)

Congratulations on your new light microscope. I do hope you get the best out of it. I am overjoyed that someone else appreciates the art of microscopy and microbiology.

However, you need to be careful to not strain your eyes. It is recommended to take breaks every 15 minutes to close your eyes or focus on something in the distance to reaccommodate your eyes. And get up every 40 minutes, stretch and correct your posture. And it is recommended to not use a microscope more than 5 hours per day. John has to chase me away from my microscope sometimes to take a break when I sit there for hours, my posture like a Caridea.

Concerning equipment, you will obviously need a scalpel or other sharp blade to make very thin slices of your specimen, as thin as possible. And forceps to move your samples (best just get a whole dissection kit it has everything). Obviously slides and coverslips, pipettes for the stains or water, maybe some tubes. A pen to label your slides. In many staining procedures ethanol or acetone is also used. A waste jar to safely dispose of any chemicals, but be careful what you mix. A rack for staining and containers. I would recommend nitrile gloves, some people are sensitive to latex.

The dyes you use depend on the specimen. For example in histological slides of tissues hematoxylin and eosin are most commonly used (short HE-stain). That's what you most likely saw on your slides, it's blue, purple and pink. Hematoxylin is a basic compound extracted and oxidised from the logwood tree (Haematoxylum campechianum), and it stains acidic compounds in the cells (or basophilic because they have an affinity for basic substances). For example nucleic acids like DNA or RNA get stained by hematoxylin because they are basophillic. And where are lots of nucleic acids? In the nucleus and ribosomes, that is why they appear blue to purple in the staining because they bind hematoxylin. Eosin is an acidic compound, and stains basic or acidophilic compounds red or pinkish, like proteins, collagen, cytoplasm, extracellular matrix.

(Ductus epididymidis with HE-stain)

(Tongue HE-stain, pointer marking a ganglion; that is my picture)

Of course there are more specific stains for specific tissues like Golgi's silver staining for neurons.

For plants toluidine blue is often used, high affinity for acidic tissues, and can stain blue to green to purple. It is often combined with safranin, a basic azine, which is probably the red stain you saw. It stains polysaccharides and lignin, woody parts of the plant. Safranin and astrablue is also often combined, astrablue stains non-lignified parts of the plant.

(Ulex europaeus stem; not my pictures I don't have any samples currently, source Atlas of plant and animal histology)

Safranin is also used in bacteriology, in the famous Gram staining. In Gram staining you use crystal violet (blue/purple), Lugol's iodine solution, then wash it with ethanol and add safranin (red) as a counter stain. Bacteria is gram-positive if the crystal violet stays in their thick murein cell wall, can't be washed out with the ethanol and the bacteria stays blue. Gram-negative appear red because of the counterstain.

(Staphyloccocus aureus (violet, gram positive) & Escherichia coli (red, gram negative); not my picture, source Wikipedia)

However, I am not sure whether you have access to any of those substances, if they are too expensive for you or if they are too hazardous if used in your own room for a prolongued time. Of course those substances need to be stored properly, and your own room is probably not a good place, especially for ethanol or acetone. The fumes. I would recommend to ask your biology or chemistry teacher whether they can recommend anything further and where to buy said solutions in your area, and if they can't they are idiots. There are also many useful resources and tutorials on Youtube.

Another fascinating experiment for your microscope, that you can perform without buying any chemicals, is a hay infusion. You put hay into a container filled with water, and let it sit undisturbed for a week in a sunny area but not in direct harsh sunlight. During that time the microorganisms in the hay are reproducing in the solution, feeding on the polysaccharides of the hay. Protozoans also flourish in the hay infusion and eat the bacteria. It might get cloudy and a bit foul smelling (best not do it in your own room if you don't want to sleep next to a rotting smell). When you put a drop of the solution onto a slide and look at it in the microscope, you should see a variety of microorganisms like bacteria (like Bacillus subtilis), amoeba, ciliates, heliozoa, algae et cetera. At different depths of the liquid you should find different kinds of organisms, because of differing oxygen content. However, pathogens can also occur in the hay infusion so handle it carefully and work sterile, wash your hands properly.

And even if you don't work at a morgue you can still get tissue samples to experiment on, after all meat is sold in supermarkets, basically the same as a human body. And at the butchers they even sell organs like chicken hearts, pig kidney, liver, blood et cetera. Or observe your own hair under the microscope.

Which kind of samples and slides were included in your starter kit? Be careful to not leave them lying around in the sunlight, or the stain might fade. Always store them in the proper box.

[science-lover33]

Exploring the Marvels of Biological Macromolecules: The Molecular Machinery of Life (Part 3)

Proteins and Enzymes: Catalysts of Molecular Reactions

Proteins are the central players in macromolecular interactions. Enzymes, a specialized class of proteins, catalyze biochemical reactions with remarkable specificity. They bind to substrates, facilitate reactions, and release products, ensuring that cellular processes occur with precision.

Protein-Protein Interactions: Orchestrating Cellular Functions

Proteins often interact with other proteins to form dynamic complexes. These interactions are pivotal in processes such as signal transduction, where cascades of protein-protein interactions transmit signals within cells, regulating diverse functions such as growth, metabolism, and immune responses.

Protein-Ligand Interactions: Molecular Recognition

Proteins can also interact with small molecules called ligands. Receptor proteins, for instance, bind to ligands such as hormones, neurotransmitters, or drugs, initiating cellular responses. These interactions rely on specific binding sites and molecular recognition.

Protein-DNA Interactions: Controlling Genetic Information

Transcription factors, a class of proteins, interact with DNA to regulate gene expression. They bind to specific DNA sequences, promoting or inhibiting transcription, thereby controlling RNA and protein synthesis.

Membrane Proteins: Regulating Cellular Transport

Integral membrane proteins participate in macromolecular interactions by regulating the transport of ions and molecules across cell membranes. Transport proteins, ion channels, and pumps interact precisely to maintain cellular homeostasis.

Cooperativity and Allosteric Regulation: Fine-Tuning Cellular Processes

Cooperativity and allosteric regulation are mechanisms that modulate protein function. In cooperativity, binding one ligand to a protein influences the binding of subsequent ligands, often amplifying the response. Allosteric regulation occurs when a molecule binds to a site other than the active site, altering the protein's conformation and activity.

Interactions in Signaling Pathways: Cellular Communication

Signal transduction pathways rely on cascades of macromolecular interactions to transmit extracellular signals into cellular responses. Kinases and phosphatases, enzymes that add or remove phosphate groups, play pivotal roles in these pathways.

Protein Folding and Misfolding: Disease Implications

Proteins must fold into specific three-dimensional shapes to function correctly. Misfolded proteins can lead to Alzheimer's, Parkinson's, and prion diseases. Chaperone proteins assist in proper protein folding and prevent aggregation.

References

Voet, D., Voet, J. G., & Pratt, C. W. (2016). Fundamentals of Biochemistry: Life at the Molecular Level. Wiley.

Lehninger, A. L., Nelson, D. L., & Cox, M. M. (2017). Lehninger Principles of Biochemistry. W. H. Freeman.

Berg, J. M., Tymoczko, J. L., & Stryer, L. (2002). Biochemistry. W. H. Freeman

[clowncaraz]

As @evyrmori said, most shifters aren't human but also aren't animals. We are not straight bioidentical animals, and we also aren't physiologically/aurally human. I feel as though, at some level, shifters evolved beside humans and animals enough to experience what they experience.

I also would like to describe my own species as being a shifter instead of it being an ability. Here are my personal beliefs.

I am taking this from a document I made in 2023 and pasting it here. Some parts will be edited like [this] or [] to add new sentences or deleting them.

THIS WILL BE LONG.

tldr; In my experience, Shifters would most likely be called "Homo sapiens ab. monstrosus" or "Homo versipellis" for the way their default physical, mass-having form seems to resemble those in the Homo genus, yet clear inspection of their phenotypic traits indicate that shifters have taught and practiced physical shapeshifting to change their bodies without the use of technology, similar to traditional practices around the world where body modification starts are the growing ages and slowly changes the shape of the bones and body (i.e. foot binding, cranial binding, corset wearing, giraffe necks, etc.)

...........

This post serves as a way to describe shifters and what they are as well as use viable research [].

Again, this post is not opinion and is [not] factual [] but focuses on speculation around biology not yet confirmed [].

Here are the three basic rules to shifting and being a shifter. [The rules are widely accepted as true, mainly in the physical plane.]

No physical being on earth has the ability to gain or drop mass at will/choice: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conservation_of_mass

Shifting as an ability is not a transmittable virus, and therefore is not something you can choose to have or be.

No physical being on earth can withstand rearranging bones, muscles, organs or brain matter in a millisecond. Therefore transformation of a shifter can only take place through days, weeks or months: https://www.quora.com/Is-it-scientifically-possible-to-shapeshift/answer/Surux-Strawde?ch=15&oid=154825684&share=9ff0f4f4&srid=fd1nM&target_type=answer

[]

Shifters are recognized as nonhuman in appearance through their [other-side], which change based on whether or not [a gene] is activated. If the [] gene is activated, it produces proteins and/or non-coding RNA. The protein created performs for the body, making structure for cells, DNA replication and moving molecules around: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Protein

Shifters [are closely related to] human beings due to the fact that their hox genes resemble and match those of Homo sapiens and the growth of a limb and bone segment is extremely unlikely. This includes growth of [individual] wings, tails, skull shapes, extra skeletal parts and muscles. Humans have 39 Hox genes split in 4 clusters, which connects to your chromosomes and genes: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1096719213003600

To remove or add any of these would not only suggest that your chromosomes are different from humans (in humans, chromosomal disorders are things such as Down Syndrome, Triple-X syndrome etc. In nonhumans, chromosomal abnormalities can cause infertility and even death to the embryo.) It's safe to say that most if not all shifters are not born with the ability to create new bones or pop them out of place without consequence. Hox genes can have gene disorders as a result of malformations. If a shifter says that their skeleton is different from others, they're [most likely not experiencing skeletal difference but somatic changes]. Hox genes [say your skeleton resembles a human] because [if not, you] would be diagnosed with Hand-foot-genital syndrome, Guttmacher syndrome, cancers or Synpolydactyly type 2.

Shifters [would then be] [] under the subtribe Hominina, under the tribe Hominini and genus of Homo. Physical characteristics of those under the subtribe are as follows: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Australopithecine

bipedal locomotion (walking on two legs)

high brachial index (forearm ratio)

greater sexual dimorphism (perisex and intersex).

Going deeper into the tribe and genus will tell you that not only are Homo sapiens sapiens the only extant species but it's most likely been that way since the myths of Gilgamesh (the very first shifter appearance in writing). [This could mean two things; shifters are human but a subspecies/forma or shifters are a sibling species.]

The only [other] way a shifter could have survived all these years as a different species/nonhuman being [(as opposed to just being human)] is if they purposely [] chose to give their nonhumanity away. Why? Because not only would that explain the appearance of them, it would explain why it's [intrinsic,] why shifters can't simply shift under a few seconds without dying from a chemical reaction or bodily combustion. [That chemical reaction, regarding instant shapeshifting and the time it takes, needs the physical power of around 2 suns to be powered. This is why it is observed that pshifting seems to be an episodic experience that starts with pflares as a sign, then has a complete pshift at a certain time.]

Shifters are [also in need of] human vitamins. If a shifter [wasn't of the Homo genus], many of the canine shifters here wouldn't have to intake meats that raise their vitamin C levels. Canines, especially dogs, make their own vitamin C: https://www.acsh.org/news/2020/03/03/why-dogs-dont-need-vitamin-c-humans-do-14611

Vitamins and other proteins are often looked over when it comes to shifting and shifter biology but it is very important to focus on physics and the bodily aspects rather than ignoring it. It could cause real damage. Vitamins are vital for skin, bone and muscle health and claiming that shifters can simply regenerate it by using their mind and will is cult language. Deficiency in vitamins can and will cause diseases such as scurvy.

Shifter alleles could have risen from environmental mutations and then became phenotypes/genotypes when the body needed it.

This causes hereditary traits to continue through bloodlines. This means that if you are a shifter, your mother or father or parent should have the genotype. It cannot skip generations as then you wouldn't be a shifter. It can be activated and not activated, and not shifting will make it inactive. If this is true, it would explain the universal experience that shifters have towards urges and callings. Which would simply be somatic expressions from the genotype being activated. Hereditary traits do not change something into a nonhuman as well. Shifters do not become nonhuman by being shifters, they become shifters. We are not the same as nonhumans. If we were, our biology and organs and bones would match.

As we have explored today, we have come to the conclusion that shifters are:

[Most likely from the Homo genus] who have animalistic features due to hereditary mimicking [of creatures]. Shifting is an ability not all shifters can do, making it impossible to gauge the difference between a non-shifting shifter and a regular shifter other than physical appearance [of the other-side]. These animalistic features are not carbon copies of the real thing and only pose to morph into what looks similar using physical methods. Since being a shifter is hereditary, it has nothing to do with species and therefore cannot change your species, sex or gender.

.......

When I talk about p shifting and it being physical, I don't mean to say that it's always something biological. I say that it's a physical feeling, a physical experience, a physical emotion.

So you aren't biologically a wolf or a tiger when you're a pshifter, but you are biologically a shifter. You are PHYSICALLY a tiger/wolf, and that physical experience AND emotion []. So questioning one species but feeling another is common because it's a physical urge to be so, not a biological one.

So yes, a cow p shifter can exist. A fly shifter can exist and a fly pshifter exists too. It's all physical, and that doesn't mean just transformation. It can mean physical instincts, urges, it can be body modification, or reshaping of the skin. It's literally anything that changes the body physically!

.....

You are [usually] born [a shifter] but features may not appear until or after prolonged shifting. The ability to shift is not universal, and is rare due to the fact that it no longer is favored and therefore is not as dominant as we think it is. [Shifting was most likely] caused by environmental pressure [(changing habitat, climbing, swimming like the Bajau)] and the need for anti-predator adaptation [(war like the Berserkers)], but was never meant to split into a new species. It now seems to be caused by benign genetic mutations. The mimic most likely wasn't supposed to copy a single species either, it was probably supposed to make [creatures] look like different predators at different times or different predators mashed into one.

Behavior and social skills that shifters have are limited by [their shifting] but are often overcome by shifters. Behaviors that may be seen; Social learning, attachment, fixed action patterns, urges related to an animal.

Physical and emotional difficulties; P-flares and m-flares causing outbursts or instability, lasting pain from shifting, joint aches, [inability to use] limbs due to overuse in shifting, physical appearance is animal-like or easily mistaken for monstrous. May act differently than [other people] due to consistent [flares] leading to shifting [].

Resulting disorders or problems [from frequent shifting]; Joint pain, muscle spasms, weak grip, organ weakness, energy loss/fatigue, myoclonus, dystonia and much more: https://www.ninds.nih.gov/health-information/disorders/repetitive-motion-disorders

......

[How to Shift based on the above information.]

In order to shift, this bear shifter has been feeling p-flares for possibly months or weeks now. These flares mean that the body is in aching/calling for a shift. This is the first part of fully shifting.

What makes the body shift?

Then, the bear shifter eats/exercises to store energy in their body. This energy will be used to build on the [] gene, activating it at the time the shift is due.

Days between flares and the shift.

The bear shifter will then use the time up to the p-shift to do other things like make their environment comfortable, engage in somatic and conscious (mental) shifts in order to push themselves to that point where the mind and body are in sync, and finally need to shift.

Shifting day.

On the day of the shift, there will be urgency and yearning for the shift. The weeks or months leading up to the shift have caused the body to absorb enough energy that it can burn it while shifting. Shifting is a practice, it is growing out features hidden within your body and transforming into what [your other-side] looks like.

Underwhelming shifts.

The first full shift you have may be underwhelming for multiple reasons. You may not finish it, you may have not had enough energy or you did not target the parts of the body that ache when you have p-flares/somatic shifts. When you do not finish a shift, it is okay to stop and not push yourself. If you do not have enough energy, immediately stop. Continuing when energy is depleted causes you to pass out and worse, be dehydrated and such. If you did not target the right areas, you simply have to take note of what areas your body wants to change.

Onto the shifting.

When you fully shift, the somatic and mental shifts you have done before should have already put your vision and mind in a place where you can feel/see your body change. This is not necessary at all but a lot of shifters use this as a way to help the body calm and focus.

Once the p-shift has started, the body should be moved in a way that is of the subspecies (bear, in this case) and the body parts that the flares want to change should be used, flexed, toned or put to work in an animalistic manner. This is so the body and mind, that are in sync, recognizes that those parts are being used the most at this time where energy is being burned. If your ears need to be longer, pull them gently. If your teeth need to be longer, chew on something tough. If this is your first shift, it will take more than one singular shift to fully grow out the features that you want. Continue using the parts that the body needs to grow out until the shift begins to drift. [Blood will be rushed to those parts of the body, causing heat and electricity through your body, and your cells should get to work.]

Aftermath

After the shift is done, the parts of the body that have grown out will either fall out/retract slowly or will stay with the human form. [The process of pulling or applying force to modify and transform the body is utilized in different ways such as "giraffe necks" in some Kenyan tribes and corset wearing.] This is an even slower process because after the shift, you are exhausted and tired and not so willing to do anything else. At this point, it is fine to sleep. []

A breakdown.

What just happened to that bear shifters body is called gene expression and psychosomatic sight. Gene expression is a natural way your body may show phenotypes, which are things like hair color and eye color. The [] gene is a pleiotropic gene, making it able to affect other genes and their phenotypes. If a bear shifter has a dark brown eye color, the shifter gene may change that based on what the body needs to grow out. The growing features (aka apparent phenotypes) are unique to the shifter and not all shifters feel the need for a tail or fur or teeth to be grown.

The conservation of mass is a theory stating that mass cannot be made or removed immediately and spontaneously. That energy equal to an atomic bomb must be present to change such a way. Shifters follow this and also get around this by being the same size as their [other-side in human form] AND gaining energy through eating and much more. Which is one reason why the gene activates. The bear shifter is the same size as their human form, and only gets bigger if both forms do.

The mind is powerful. Syncing it with the body not only causes focus but keeps the body alive in dire situations. Tricking the brain is a common practice in trances, magic and much more. If you are using psychosomatic sight, this means that what your body feels is what you see. If you're deep into a mental and somatic shift, you will sometimes see your body transformation before you. This is [usually normal when deliberate and voluntary] and also an important thing to remember when shifting. The brain, is physical too. Tricking your brain by creating the environment your [other-side] lives in is a trigger to your body that you may need the features you grow out.

Like the avian shifters, features such as wings will not disappear unless the body is in an environment where it doesn't need it. If you are in a hot environment and are a shifter with fur, your fur will fall off or shed. This is to keep your natural temperature low and to prevent heatstroke. If you have wings and are not using them, your body will begin to ween off of blood circulation and muscle strength. Even if this one shift didn't turn you into an animal, another shift where you are more knowing of your [other-side] and their habitat and the features your body wants- will. It is a process and a long journey. []

At the end of the day, what is more important than anything is getting enough exercise, food and water and mental health checks as possible. Please do not mistake physical shifting as a medical condition when you are not a shifter, check your family history or with other personnel to determine the cause. Please be safe, remember to love yourself.

....

Link to food gene expression: https://href.li/?https://www.welltheory.com/post/food-and-gene-expression

Link to exercise gene expression: https://href.li/?https://www.americanscientist.org/article/exercise-controls-gene-expression

here's nightmare cat with a human skeleton so I can visually show you what an adult domestic cat shifter would look like.

[nhaneh]

the whole question of whether viruses are or are not really "alive" is kind of interesting to me because viruses are kind of like software if you think about it?

Like a virus on its own is a fairly inert thing - it's a packet of RNA code inside a protein casing and doesn't really do anything on its own except float around until they contact a matching cell membrane whereupon the casing gets hooked up and the RNA injected. In software terms, RNA is kind of like a segment of free-floating biological machine code, while the casing is the encapsulating data structure that allows it to interface with things, like the MZ EXE format of the DOS/Windows world or the ELF format of Unix and its relatives. What effectively makes biological viruses work at all is the fact that cells tend to absorb the contents of anything that can bind to their surface and have minimal if any protections in place against processing foreign RNA code. In computer security terms, cells are extremely vulnerable to remote code execution, and the antiviral protections that the body has is primarily a question of either identifying and eliminating viral particles before they get linked up to a cell, or murdering any cell that looks infected.

Okay that's interesting but what does that have to do with whether or not viruses are alive you may ask, so let me pull this analogy together a little by asking the following: Where does software exist?

This might seem like a silly question at first, but it's actually not as simple as it might seem. Consider this post you're reading - where is it? Well, on the servers of tumblr dot com you may say, but you're not looking at the servers right now, are you. Okay well a local copy on the device you're reading this on too then - and sure, there is definitely such a copy, but you're not looking at that either, not directly at least: that data only exists in memory as electrical signals and charges on a few microchips are not something we can see either. No, what you're looking at is an image most likely rendered on a screen through a complex interplay of code and data, of both hardware and software operating together, and only from that full stack of interoperating elements does the post you're reading emerge in a form that you can read.

Or, to go back to the main topic: viruses are code - code which comes alive when introduced to a living cell, but lies inert within the virus itself. They live in the sense that they have functional biological machine code, if you will, but lack the active process with which to execute said code themselves. Like software needs some kind of computer to run, a virus needs a living cell to run - they are alive but only when inside a cell, on their own in isolation they are just inert clumps of protein that depend on being picked up and executed.

A virus is kind of the ultimate expression of life as an emergent property: no one single part of the virus itself is really alive, and yet when introduced to a susceptible cell, its code will interact with the processes of that cell and real, living behaviour emerges. The life of viruses is not contained anywhere within the virus itself, it is something that only exists in interaction with other things outside of itself.

[gallifreyinstituteforlearning]

Hello! I am a molecular biologist, and I was wondering if I could get your opinion on some of my theories on Gallifreyans.

I haven't read through everything on your blog yet, but I'm working my way through it (lol). So some of this may not be quite accurate with what you have set up thus far.

Basically, I want to briefly discuss alternative splicing! Anyway, in metazoans, alternative splicing outcomes can be regulated in a time and tissue specific manner by legitimately hundreds of biomolecules such as RNA binding proteins, chromatin remodelers, hormones, etc etc. It is subject to epigenetic regulation as alternative splicing and transcription are coupled (and splicing largely occurs cotranscriptionally), so details such as DNA methylation, nucleosome positioning, histone modifications, etc can change the balance of different mRNA isoforms. This is largely because these factors will either help recruit splicing factors (or inhibit their recruitment) or because it will slow RNA Polymerase II elongation.

Onto my theories. I have been thinking for a little while that the lindos hormone can perhaps modulate splicing, triggering the production of regeneration-specific isoforms. Perhaps their bodies work so fast that isoforms promoting totipotency trigger a temporary transition away from the cells' differentiated states.

I also think it could be possible that they have some novel ability to, say, "unsplice," which humans cannot do. This could potentially allow them to use already made transcripts and then completely change them to produce unique proteins without needing to transcribe another mRNA. This could feasibly allow them to rapidly change what proteins are in each cell (perhaps quick enough that it occurs within the regeneration itself). Although, there would be some instability while now unused proteins get degraded or the splicing/unsplicing ratio stabilizes (the molding period). This would require intense regulation as well as unsplicing and resplicing would now be posttranscriptional, but I digress.

Sorry to bother you with the long post, I just had too many nerdy ideas going through my head. Thanks!

-gallifreyanhotfive

Molecular Biology: 'Unsplicing'

Oh, you thrill me with your biology talk! Molecular biology is not a speciality so apologies in advance for any limited response.

🔬 Lindos and Its Variations

Something to be covered in the new Anatomy and Physiology guide is a wider look at the role of Lindos in Time Lords, so we're hitting the nail on the head here.

Under stress, injury, or during the process of regeneration, the lindal gland significantly increases its production of the hormone Lindoneogen like a caffeine-fueled scientist, resulting in a corresponding surge in lindos cell production. There are several forms of lindos cells, including:

Lindopoetic Progenitor Cells (LPCs): Dormant cells that spring into action upon Lindoneogen stimulation.

Lindopoietic Stem Cells (LSCs): Residing in the yellow bone marrow, ready to differentiate under the guidance of Lindoneogen and the catalytic influence of artron, into ...

Lindoblasts and Phagolindotropes: Specialised cells responsible for regenerating tissue and recycling cellular components from the previous incarnation.

Haemolindocytes: Circulating cells that endow Gallifreyan blood with its regenerative properties.

💡Splicing and Lindoneogen

Lindoneogen could play a key role in alternative splicing, creating specific mRNA isoforms vital for regeneration. This implies that Lindoneogen is not just a cellular signal but also a molecular tool for crafting the necessary protein portfolio for regeneration. So Lindoneogen may trigger the production of specific mRNA isoforms that are vital for the regeneration process, which could lead to the expression of proteins that facilitate the transition of cells into a more pluripotent state.

🖇️Unsplicing

Love this idea. 'Unsplicing' as your concept presents would be particularly relevant during regeneration. It could allow cells to quickly alter their protein expression profiles without the lag of new mRNA transcription. This rapid adaptation would be pretty handy for the efficient transition of cells to suit the requirements of the new incarnation.

🔗Integrating with Lindos Cells

This concept of 'unsplicing' could be particularly prominent in the function of phagolindotropes. As these cells are responsible for consuming the previous incarnation’s cells and replacing them with new ones, their ability to 'unsplice' and rapidly change protein expression would be pretty useful. This mechanism might also support the functions of lindoblasts and haemolindocytes in tissue regeneration and blood adaptability.

🏫 So ...

The addition of splicing and unsplicing mechanisms to the lindos theory suggests a more complex and dynamic process than simple cellular proliferation and differentiation, with dynamic genetic adaptations at the molecular level highlighting the advanced biological capabilities of Gallifreyans. Good work, Batman!

More content ... →📫Got a question? | 📚Complete list of Q+A →😆Jokes |🩻Biology |🗨️Language |🕰️Throwbacks |🤓Facts →🫀Gallifreyan Anatomy and Physiology Guide (pending) →⚕️Gallifreyan Emergency Medicine Guides →📝Source list (WIP) →📜Masterpost If you're finding your happy place in this part of the internet, feel free to buy a coffee to help keep our exhausted human conscious. She works full-time in medicine and is so very tired 😴

[science-sculpt]

Exploring RNA Interference

Imagine a molecular switch within your cells, one that can selectively turn off the production of specific proteins. This isn't science fiction; it's the power of RNA interference (RNAi), a groundbreaking biological process that has revolutionized our understanding of gene expression and holds immense potential for medicine and beyond.

The discovery of RNAi, like many scientific breakthroughs, was serendipitous. In the 1990s, Andrew Fire and Craig Mello were studying gene expression in the humble roundworm, Caenorhabditis elegans (a tiny worm). While injecting worms with DNA to study a specific gene, they observed an unexpected silencing effect - not just in the injected cells, but throughout the organism. This puzzling phenomenon, initially named "co-suppression," was later recognized as a universal mechanism: RNAi.

Their groundbreaking work, awarded the Nobel Prize in 2006, sparked a scientific revolution. Researchers delved deeper, unveiling the intricate choreography of RNAi. Double-stranded RNA molecules, the key players, bind to a protein complex called RISC (RNA-induced silencing complex). RISC, equipped with an "Argonaut" enzyme, acts as a molecular matchmaker, pairing the incoming RNA with its target messenger RNA (mRNA) - the blueprint for protein production. This recognition triggers the cleavage of the target mRNA, effectively silencing the corresponding gene.

So, how exactly does RNAi silence genes? Imagine a bustling factory where DNA blueprints are used to build protein machines. RNAi acts like a tiny conductor, wielding double-stranded RNA molecules as batons. These batons bind to specific messenger RNA (mRNA) molecules, the blueprints for proteins. Now comes the clever part: with the mRNA "marked," special molecular machines chop it up, effectively preventing protein production. This targeted silencing allows scientists to turn down the volume of specific genes, observing the resulting effects and understanding their roles in health and disease.

The intricate dance of RNAi involves several key players:dsRNA: The conductor, a long molecule with two complementary strands. Dicer: The technician, an enzyme that chops dsRNA into small interfering RNAs (siRNAs), about 20-25 nucleotides long. RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC): The ensemble, containing Argonaute proteins and the siRNA. Target mRNA: The specific "instrument" to be silenced, carrying the genetic instructions for protein synthesis.

The siRNA within RISC identifies and binds to the complementary sequence on the target mRNA. This binding triggers either:Direct cleavage: Argonaute acts like a molecular scissors, severing the mRNA, preventing protein production. Translation inhibition: RISC recruits other proteins that block ribosomes from translating the mRNA into a protein.

From Labs to Life: The Diverse Applications of RNAi

The ability to silence genes with high specificity unlocks various applications across different fields:

Unlocking Gene Function: Researchers use RNAi to study gene function in various organisms, from model systems like fruit flies to complex human cells. Silencing specific genes reveals their roles in development, disease, and other biological processes.

Therapeutic Potential: RNAi holds immense promise for treating various diseases. siRNA-based drugs are being developed to target genes involved in cancer, viral infections, neurodegenerative diseases, and more. Several clinical trials are underway, showcasing the potential for personalized medicine.

Crop Improvement: In agriculture, RNAi offers sustainable solutions for pest control and crop development. Silencing genes in insects can create pest-resistant crops, while altering plant genes can improve yield, nutritional value, and stress tolerance.

Beyond the Obvious: RNAi applications extend beyond these core areas. It's being explored for gene therapy, stem cell research, and functional genomics, pushing the boundaries of scientific exploration.

Despite its exciting potential, RNAi raises ethical concerns. Off-target effects, unintended silencing of non-target genes, and potential environmental risks need careful consideration. Open and responsible research, coupled with public discourse, is crucial to ensure we harness this powerful tool for good.

RNAi, a testament to biological elegance, has revolutionized our understanding of gene regulation and holds immense potential for transforming various fields. As advancements continue, the future of RNAi seems bright, promising to silence not just genes, but also diseases, food insecurity, and limitations in scientific exploration. The symphony of life, once thought unchangeable, now echoes with the possibility of fine-tuning its notes, thanks to the power of RNA interference.

[flyonthewallmedstudent]

Finegoldia magna

Cold open with a case report:

60M with a past history of previous wrist fracture presents with worsening pain and swelling, erythema and reduced range of motion, after suffering an abrasion from changing a tire.

the previous injury resulted from an MVA 9 yrs prior with a closed rist fracture

there was also a history of ETOH use and possible malnutrition, which can result in immunosuppression

Xray showed extensive changes in the wrist bones compared to past years with near loss of several, suggestive of pyogenic arthritis

Aspiration of the wrist joint grew Finegoldia magna

What is it

not actually uncommon

but is more commonly associated with post op infections or prosthetic joint infections (so case reports are harder to find in this category)

previously known as peptostreptococcus (sounds like peptobismol) but was renamed following 16S rna sequence availability, so in older texts/articles you'll still see it's old name

it's a commensal, so normal part of our microflora, but is opportunistic like so many other pathogens we usually live with and covers our body

It is a Gram Positive Anaerobe, of the same flavour of clostridium. Remember there's fewer gram positive anaerobes than there are aerobes. So consider it in cultures if there's only growth in the anaerobe bottle and it's gram positive (purple). Usually it likes mucosal surfaces, such as the GI or GU tracts, but it doesn't mind skin either. It's considered a "gram positive anaerobic cocci" (GPAC) and has increasing prevalence and antibiotic resistance in the group.

Image source

Increased risk and when to think of it

chronic ulcers, diabetic ulcers

associated with biofilms (always bad, requires prolonged duration of antibiotics)

prosthetic joints

prosthetic valves

as it is opportunistic, also consider it in the immunocompromised

In the case above, the patient had septic arthritis, for which anaerobes account for 20% of cases. And Finegoldia is often the culprit in the case of post op and prosthetic joint infections. Rarely affects normal joints or healed joints from previous closed trauma years prior.

In chronic wounds it can impair healing via Protein L, which bindings to antibodies, causing immunomodulatory effect.

Bit of history

named for Sydney Finegold, an American physician who was a founding member of IDSA (infectious diseases society of American) and one of its early former presidents

but the name did make me think of 'fine gold'

Treatment

luckily susceptible to penicillin - but there is growing resistance, hence relevance of always chasing susceptibility

alternatives: metronidazole (typical class that covers anaerobes), tazocin and carbapenems

also has increasing resistance to clindamycin (a consideration in penicillin allergy or during empirical therapy for wounds)

Resources:

case report

wikipaedia

microbe canvas

[didanawisgi]

Abstract

Preclinical studies of COVID-19 mRNA vaccine BNT162b2, developed by Pfizer and BioNTech, showed reversible hepatic effects in animals that received the BNT162b2 injection. Furthermore, a recent study showed that SARS-CoV-2 RNA can be reverse-transcribed and integrated into the genome of human cells. In this study, we investigated the effect of BNT162b2 on the human liver cell line Huh7 in vitro. Huh7 cells were exposed to BNT162b2, and quantitative PCR was performed on RNA extracted from the cells. We detected high levels of BNT162b2 in Huh7 cells and changes in gene expression of long interspersed nuclear element-1 (LINE-1), which is an endogenous reverse transcriptase. Immunohistochemistry using antibody binding to LINE-1 open reading frame-1 RNA-binding protein (ORFp1) on Huh7 cells treated with BNT162b2 indicated increased nucleus distribution of LINE-1. PCR on genomic DNA of Huh7 cells exposed to BNT162b2 amplified the DNA sequence unique to BNT162b2. Our results indicate a fast up-take of BNT162b2 into human liver cell line Huh7, leading to changes in LINE-1 expression and distribution. We also show that BNT162b2 mRNA is reverse transcribed intracellularly into DNA in as fast as 6 h upon BNT162b2 exposure.

[the-diabolic-acid]

reasons why i am not mature enough for my major:

phagocytes

alpha beta and omega carbons

the tight loose and open confirmation of the alpha beta subunit of ATP synthase

fixed action patterns (or FAP as it is commonly shortened to)

the ρ protein binds to the rut site in RNA

yerkes dodson and optimal arousal

the blood type gene (or the A/B/O gene as it is commonly shortened to)

the everything about me

[sproutystudies]

DNA Methylation

Hello! This week's educational post is on DNA methylation. Note that DNA methylation functions a bit differently in plants vs animals. This post will be more plant-centric since that is what I study.

DNA methylation refers to the addition of a methyl group (one carbon molecule) to the 5' position of a cytosine base in the DNA. This is a type of epigenetic mark, or a heritable genetic modification without a change in DNA sequence (Takuno & Gaut, 2012). It alters the expression of genes through transcriptional silencing, usually by preventing the binding of polymerase. However, the exact ways methylation regulates and is regulated can differ depending on context (Neiderhuth & Schmitz, 2016). There are three contexts in which DNA methylation can occur: CG, CHG, and CHH, where H represents A, T, or C (Neiderhuth & Schmitz, 2016).

Methylation in the CG context, known as CpG methylation, is the most stable of the three contexts. After DNA replication occurs, VIM1-5 recognizes hemi-methylated CG sites and recruits the methyltransferase MET1 to methylate the unmethylated strand (Neiderhuth & Schmitz, 2016). CpG methylation around the transcriptional start site causes transcriptional silencing, while CpG methylation in the gene body is associated with active, and even increased, transcription (Neiderhuth & Schmitz, 2016).

Methylation in the CHG context is the second most stable. It is maintained by the methyltransferase CMT3, which depends on the H3K9me2 histone modification (I'll go over histone modifications for my next educational post) in a positive feedback loop that maintains the locations of both these epigenetic marks (Neiderhuth & Schmitz, 2016). This feedback loop can be broken by the histone demethylase IBM1, causing transcription to become reactivated (Neiderhuth & Schmitz, 2016).

CHH methylation cannot be maintained after DNA replication due to its asymmetry: lack of a guanine on the methylated strand means there is no cytosine to methylate on the opposite strand (Neiderhuth & Schmitz, 2016). CHH methylation is always established de novo by the methyltransferase CMT2 or through the RNA-directed DNA methylation (RdDM) pathway (Neiderhuth & Schmitz, 2016).

De novo DNA methylation for all three contexts can be mediated by the RdDM pathway (Zhang et al, 2018). In this process, short-interfering RNAs (siRNAs) work together with scaffold RNAs and a variety of proteins to guide the methyltransferase DRM2 to target regions for methylation (Zhang et al, 2018).

Transcriptional regulation through DNA methylation is important for a variety of processes related to plant development and genome stability. Specifically, it has been shown to be involved in transposon silencing (Slotkin & Martienssen, 2007), fruit ripening (Xiao et al, 2020), genetic imprinting (Rodrigues et al, 2013), and aging (D’Amico-Willman et al, 2024).

(Neiderhuth & Schmitz, 2016)

Important Terms: DNA methylation, epigenetics, cytosine, transcription, methyltransferase

[sevenrs]

Do you have more iterator immune system headcanons? I would absolutely love to hear them >:) (or just immune system facts in general those are really cool)

inspectors definitely act on a more macro scale when it comes to defenses. there isn't a single cell i can compare them to because the roles of immune cells are very specific and inspectors are pretty general in how they act (poking around crevices, attacking, etc.) i know their design is very hydra-inspired, but they also look like dendritic cells to me.

these cells are best described as the "brains" of the immune system (except they dont have real thoughts and are stupid because they are cells but. moving on). these cells sample the surrounding fluid and if they identify a protein that is foreign, they are the first step in the adaptive immune response. they are technically part of the innate immune system, but they bridge the gap

iterators have a lot of microbes in them that need to stay alive. they probably defend themselves through one of the various immune systems they can have. i think the most interesting is one that a lot of bacteria have, CRISPR-CAS. this defense is primarily used against viruses. when viruses inject their genetic material into the bacteria, the bacteria will take a part of the virus's genome and add it to its own for memory (CRISPR). rna is then transcribed from this dna and cleaved into individual parts, each with one with one piece of rna from one virus. then, with tracer RNA (tracRNA), bind to the CAS9 protein and this complex searches the cell for the matching DNA sequence. when found, it will unwind the viral dna and chop it up, rendering it ineffective as more proteins and enzymes dissolve the DNA. yes this is where gene editing was discovered

this part is speculation, but maybe it helps with iterating. iirc new ideas are thought of when the microbes grow and change :p