#Economic Diversity

[tmarshconnors]

Buckinghamshire VS West Sussex

Buckinghamshire and West Sussex are both counties in England, and they have distinct characteristics. Here's a brief comparison of the two:

Location:

Buckinghamshire: Located in South East England, Buckinghamshire is close to London and is known for its picturesque countryside, historic towns, and proximity to the Chiltern Hills.

West Sussex: Situated in the South East of England as well, West Sussex is known for its diverse landscapes, including the South Downs National Park, beautiful coastline, and historic towns.

Countryside and Landscapes:

Buckinghamshire: Known for its rolling hills, the Chiltern Hills Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty, and the Thames Valley, Buckinghamshire offers a mix of rural and suburban landscapes.

West Sussex: Offers a diverse landscape with the South Downs, which is a range of chalk hills, as well as coastal areas along the English Channel.

Economy:

Buckinghamshire: The county has a strong economy, with a mix of industries including technology, healthcare, and finance. It is home to some affluent towns and has good transport links to London.

West Sussex: The economy in West Sussex is varied, with a focus on agriculture, manufacturing, and tourism. It also has commuter towns and is within reach of London.

Towns and Cities:

Buckinghamshire: Includes towns such as High Wycombe, Aylesbury, Olney and Milton Keynes. Milton Keynes is a new town known for its modern planning and development.

West Sussex: Chichester, Worthing Littlehampton, and Crawley are among the towns in West Sussex. Crawley is known for its proximity to Gatwick Airport.

Historical and Cultural Attractions:

Buckinghamshire: Boasts historical sites like Bletchley Park, the former World War II codebreaking centre, as well as historic houses like Waddesdon Manor.

West Sussex: Features attractions such as Chichester Cathedral, Arundel Castle, and the Weald and Downland Living Museum.

Transportation:

Buckinghamshire: Well-connected to London by road and rail, with the M40 motorway passing through and several train services.

West Sussex: Accessible by major roads, and Gatwick Airport, one of the busiest airports in the UK, is located in West Sussex.

Ultimately, the choice between Buckinghamshire and West Sussex depends on personal preferences, lifestyle, and specific needs. Both counties offer a mix of rural charm, historical attractions, and economic opportunities.

[delicatelysublimeforester]

A Symphony of Sounds in the Afforestation Area

[ghostjelliess]

Poverty Displayed in Fiction

TL;DR: I wish authors would stop using poverty as a temporary character skin when readers are told it’s a defining characteristic/obstacle.

Stealing stuff sucks, getting your stuff stolen sucks, getting caught sucks, and in most worlds being poor and starving means you die, not that you just steal shit from all the rich people around you — there aren’t rich people around you.

Poverty is not a plot arc. It’s not a noble thing for a character to get through, it’s a trauma we have to recover from. It’s exhausting and you engage in the world around you in a different way, your expectations for your life or survival are held in a different place, in your gut not your heart. Depression, anxiety, financial instability, the threat of homelessness, malnutrition/obesity, increased stress, lack of sleep, developing mental disorders or disorders devoid of treatment, PTSD from events more likely to happen in poverty-ridden neighborhoods like criminal violence, gang wars, assault, sa, abuse left unchecked etc. It sets different moral standards.

I keep running into these adult fantasy books that I’ve been calling gritty-girl books, where the female authors write a badass character and she’s poor, and so she’s gritty and desperate and clinging to the opportunity or potential of whatever the catalyst is, or compromising the characters own morals (like I know stealing is wrong but I’m going to starve, instead of I don’t think stealing this is wrong), but I don’t know if it’s the author or the editors, if the books are smoothed out to be understood by a certain middle-class audience because they’re the ones with money, but there’s an irritating trend where the poverty is treated like an accessory to an otherwise healthy character, so they are denied the bigger problems of ignorance or naivete that actually come with poverty. 

Cinderella works because she is not poor. She grew up wealthy, going to these festival functions, learning to dance, she knows the social rules of the upper class, it is her immediate family who mistreat her. An actual rags-to-riches girl going to the ball wouldn’t know how to dance, might not recognize the prince, or would be happy just being there at all, maybe with a group of friends who broke in together because the consequences don’t matter when you’ll be dead by twenty. 

Okay, there’s the opening of my TedTalk, I have a lot more thoughts but I’m stopping myself because I don’t think specific books need to be named. I’m just... I’m sick of the romanticization of poverty for the drama. The traumas might be interesting but they take so much longer to unravel because there isn’t time for regret. There is no safe place to run home to when things don’t work out, there’s just people calling you crazy and trying your best not to believe it, or spiraling because maybe it’s true. 

But the biggest indiscretion to me is the lack of ignorance. Being poor (from the beginning, not a stumble down and get-back-up) and trying to not-be-poor is so full of humiliation and embarrassment. Here are some (ugh, personal) examples for the dark-academia aesthetic that is usually the most irritating offender:

Your college professors fail you because you don’t talk right, you didn’t learn academic English but they expect you to know it.

You give a presentation in your best dress and the sponsor asks to talk to you about dress codes and someone calls you slutty or ghetto and you realize your best dress isn’t that great and the fancy hoops you got from your mom for your birthday are making them stare.

You are always overworked and underpaid; four jobs, all of them overlapping, and only some people understand.

The busses don’t run on time and you’re either running or waiting.

You wash your clothes in the bathtub and spend more money on bank fees because it costs to have an account if there’s not more than $1500 in it, and you’ve never even seen that much money at once in your life; you get a cash payout for a side gig and the $500 in twenties feels like you’ve made it somewhere, but when you tell your roommate, they laugh and call you so cute and the bank still charges you $5/month because it’s not enough. It will never be enough. You finally got $1500 scraped up to stop that slow leak and you get a letter/email kindly explaining that the usage fee now requires $2000 to remain in the account and a great way to do this is to move $500 to savings. 

There’s an eviction warning notice taped to your door, but you paid rent. Your roommate didn’t. You scrape another half together and they swear to pay you back. They do, slowly, never enough to stop the bank fees. The property management changes and the new people are more strict, they say it’s okay to pay on the third because of your schedule when you show them your pay dates, but there’s another eviction threat on your door when you come home at midnight on the second. You sigh but none of your neighbors judge you because they understand. You wake up in four hours to go to your next job because they lied about not scheduling you as an opener, it’s all they will give you, and you need to pay rent two days earlier now. Your roommate is looking for another job but no one is hiring; the other roommate you were going to live with is getting married, she’s pregnant and didn’t want to be in school in the first place, you’re happy for her, but there is nowhere to live.

Your car breaks, held together by duct tape and prayers, your mechanic uncles did the best they could. You buy a new-used vehicle to get you to work and back, it’s a fixer-upper, your mechanic family checks it out and confirms it’s good. You bring it in for an oil change on your only day off and your uncle’s friend says sorry, but you can’t drive this off the lot, it’s unsafe and we can’t let you leave, the frame is rusted and the brakeline’s about to snap. It’s totaled out. The buses don’t run until 7 which is two hours after your open shifts start, so you start looking for a new job. You’ll graduate soon and there will be more jobs, better jobs. You have honors and all your professors say you’re going to do great things, and you are only moving forward in the hope that they are right, but what if they’re wrong? 

Your phone is so old it’s just for emergencies, you don’t know how to communicate through social media, you never get the emails that class was canceled or changed, you can’t afford the contracts for a new phone and you’re using a laptop loaned from the school; you have to run to the library to print projects and papers, you don’t have time to find all the cool programs or connections of your peers who are learning extra skills and networking in their free time. You’ve never even been to anything akin to a frat party. 

You started dating, but it was too stressful, so you went on dates instead of committing to a relationship, and that was a different kind of stressful, so you vow to stay single until you can breathe, but who knows when that will be and now you’ve got all these relationship traumas to work out later when you can start to sort the pieces, right now they don’t matter, they can’t, it’s 1am and you’re just getting home from closing because the manager was being ridiculous, you have an exam at 8am, another shift at the cafe at 10am, a paper due at 2pm, you’ll write that at work, and you’re supposed to be editing this dissertation by the end of the week, and your professor wants to know if you’ve thought about grad school. You’ve never thought about grad school.  

You are always given a lecture by your councilor about how lucky you are to have this scholarship, while they also explain why the other scholarship fund was terminated and will no longer be covering room and board and yes it’s the middle of the semester, and yes the football team just got an anonymous $6million dollar donation for a new stadium even though we built that one six years ago, but we can’t do anything about it. You work your way through the FAFSA loan paperwork and sit through a workshop for first-generation students, the governor cuts another scholarship that you worked your ass off to get, again mid-semester and without warning, the money’s not there, they all explain. You see the loan money and it doesn’t even cover textbooks or food, just your final classes, and you wonder if it’s worth it. You check to make sure your loans aren’t inheritable by family, just in case you don’t make it, not because you’re depressed, but because there is a long list of health problems you’ve never gotten checked out because doctors are expensive and you’ve never had insurance.

You don’t have money or time, so you don’t eat; you sprain your ankle but you don’t go get it checked out, you just add it to the list of future-problems you’re not sure you’ll get enough time to address, but you’ve been living on the edge of life-and-death for your whole life, so it doesn’t feel dramatic, just a shuffle of priorities. Your peers whine and complain and you try to understand them, and it’s not until a new friend/partner comes in and starts pointing out the damages, genuinely concerned, that you notice how much they’re even hurting you, how much you can’t sleep even when you find the time, how you go until you’re curled up napping in a hallway, passed out as classmates try not to wake you — you used to think it was a superpower that you could sleep anywhere but really it’s sad and now your recognize their looks were pity, not empathy. 

You don’t have time to go to club meetings with the peers from your major so they don’t know who you are, and you don’t even know you’re supposed to do that because no one helped you through this. You start hanging out with grad students because they understand more, they’re more willing to forgive, and they’re as exhausted as you. You’re doing the master’s program anyway, so they like you, but they can’t help you.

Obviously not everyone’s experience is the same and money-problems-right-now doesn’t directly mean poverty, but it’s just so common in these adult fantasy books with one foot in the dark-academia aesthetic, and it just triggered me.

How do these characters already know how to dress like their peers? Where did they get jewel-toned and neutral clothes when the thrift stores mostly have the neons that were so popular ten years ago and their cousin/sibling hand-me-downs stopped fitting over the summer? How did they get the required tools, textbooks, and language skills? How are their bodies healthy? How are they confident and focused on their goals, when they don’t even know how to sign up for classes and still have to work fifty hours a week plus credits? When the magical opportunity to take a break or solve a problem is presented, why are they hesitating? How come their priorities don’t match their situation or character or past that we spent the whole book reviewing? 

Obviously this is being pedantic.

There are many different types and layers of poverty and abuse and neglect and struggle, I think it’s just that all these characters share the same kind: they lost their parents so there’s no one to teach/hurt them anymore, they don’t have money but they don’t have debt, they fell in with the wrong crowd but have no addictions or strings pulling them back, there was nothing good about those people, they grew up in violence and uncertainty but have big dreams for their certain futures. They’re always a kind of exception-character, and my frustrations are of my own making because I get momentarily excited at the representation or the relatability, only to have the rug pulled out like: just kidding, they’re not that kind of poor, they’re conveniently poor, it’s fixable (but not with the magic, that’s for character development only). 

The authors so often make these characters healthy people cosplaying in poverty, and then they have to explain the character’s choices because they don’t make sense (i.e. a character is stealing even though they think its wrong, but no one around them thinks it’s wrong so why do they feel guilty, ope, we’re lost in the exposition). And again, maybe this is because publishers/editors think the people with money to buy books won’t understand or relate or appreciate that kind of grueling obstacle, so they make the poverty a temporary problem, and by doing so, remove its impact on the character’s identity and choices. I don’t know, I’m just sick of it. 

It’s like those slow-pan shots of athletes doing those mud-runs, but if all their hard-won muscles faded when they hose off at the end. It deflates the narrative and accomplishment of all the work that got the character to the point the author tells us they’re at. It feels like certain author’s felt insecure about writing the grittiness but didn’t want to make a Hallmark movie temporary-poverty type problem, so they just paper machete until it holds shape, or maybe the editors come through and strip it away and no one cares. I really don’t know. If it’s a defining characteristic, make it definitive, make it part of the character arc, if it’s not, don’t make it a defining characteristic. 

OH MY GOD IT’S CHECKOV’S [POVERTY] GUN! That’s what it is! Don’t tell me how gritty and grimy your character is, don’t focus on how layered the dirt is as a selling point or major character/plot development, if we’re not going to work on scrubbing it off. If the character gets hosed down at the end and all the dirt comes off at once, then it’s not layers, it’s just one slip in a mud puddle. I think some authors try complicating characters and adding depth that isn’t necessarily needed, and then when everything’s supposed to be okay at the end, or the layers of dirt cause no problems, no itching, no stiffness, no smell, absolutely no impact to the character, I’m just left like: what? You made me look at the mud, I’m relating to the mud because you pointed it out, I can’t ignore it now... so... do something with it. Pick at it, scrub it off, toss your character in the deep end, but don’t just layer them in convenient mud for the looks and then assume it just washed away during the heroes journey or whatever. It’s weird. It’s a weird thing to do. There are more problems than money and plenty of seemingly-wealthy people have money problems, stop using poverty as an anti-hero morally-grey shortcut by association and assumption. 

I’m not going to name the triggering books, but I will say that I think Starling House by Alix E. Harrow did a pretty gosh-darn good job at representation and the poverty isn’t an accessory, but a genuine antagonist in some ways.

[liberalsarecool]

500 Blue Biden counties generate 71% of GDP.

2500 Red MAGA counties generate 29% of GDP.

Democratic counties are wealthier because they are urbanised, better educated, economically complex, and more productive economically.

Essentially, the wealth generating parts of the economy are also less conservative because of education and diversity.

🎯

[rhyperographer]

For anyone wondering what happened to make Silicon Valley Bank here's the TL:DR:

SVB had very few consumer loans. Their investment base was primarily government bonds. A government bond is basically a loan to the gov at a fixed rate for a set period.

Their liability base was primarily consumer and investor savings.

They made money on the difference between what they were paying people in interest for their savings, and what the gov was paying them for the bonds.

They were then investing their profits into startups and tech businesses.

Then the loan rate rose, the interest rate on savings went up in the market, and to stay competative they had to put their rates up. They can't reclaim their investments as startups don't have the money to give back. The rate rises, their profits shrink, and they go boom.

[shinobicyrus]

Hey, yanno how Climate Change is a real thing that is tangibly, at this moment, affecting our world?

Well it turns out, the wealthy and their investment firms have been seeing the mounting evidence that oil companies have had for decades and are slowly starting to think more long-term about their portfolios in the face of rising sea levels, more extreme weather, and the myriad of ways climate crises are affecting...well. Everything. Maybe this means they invest more into sustainability, green energy, building more resilient infrastructure, or carbon offsets. Some of it, of course, is simple corporate greenwashing, but there are those that are taking this trend and packaging it into something called ESG (Environmental, Social, and corporate Governance).

Now some people would say this is predictable, even sensible. Just the good ol’ Free Market(tm) rationally responding to market forces and a changing world.

But those people would be fools! Insidious fools! For conservative sorcerers have come out with a new cursed phrase to explain this new market trend: Woke Investing.

What makes this investing “woke?” Well, much like how conservatives normally flounder when trying to define a word they stole from black people, “Woke Investing” essentially just means any kind of capital investment that they, the fossil fuel billionaire class and their sycophants, don’t personally profit from.

One of these aforementioned sycophants is Andy Puzder, conservative commentator, fellow at The Heritage Foundation, and former fast-food CEO. He calls this kind of so-called woke investing “socialism in sheep’s clothing,” further explaining in leaked audio of a closed-door meeting:

“My father's generation's challenge was the Nazis, who, by the way, were, of course, very proud socialists[citation fucking needed]. The challenge of my generation was the communists, who were, of course, very committed socialists. The challenge of your generation is ESG investing, and it's more insidious than communism or the Nazis.”(source)

You heard it here first, folks. Not investing as much in fossil fuels is more insidious than the Third Fucking Reich.

As usual, the Heritage Foundation is putting their petro-chemical donor’s money where their mouth is. Bills are being proposed to blacklist banks that don’t invest in key state industries, such as West Virginia coal or Texas oil. Fourteen states have already passed bills to restrict ESG-type investing, with Florida Governor Ron “Bullies Kids for Wearing Masks” Desantis leading the charge.

In other words, Climate Denial has reached such a point that so-called Free Market Conservatives who claim to hate big government are trying to make it illegal for banks, investment firms, and financial institutions to make any financial decisions that acknowledges Climate Change is real.

[weedle-testaburger]

there's this kind of youtuber i lowkey really hate who aren't overt bigots or anything but just do this thing where they seem to try stupidly hard to look for reasons to hate media that just so happens to have a lot of marginalised rep in it. especially if it has a thematic point that would involve acknowledging politics

[ahalliance]

fighting for my life for dark-skinned heathcliff in this wuthering heights class

[theadaptableeducator]

Towards a Sustainable Future: Hannah Arendt on the Interconnectivity and Non-sustainability of Colonialism, Nationalism, Imperialism, and Capitalism

Hannah Arendt’s political philosophy provides a rich framework to examine the interconnectivity and non-sustainability of colonialism, nationalism, imperialism, and capitalism. Through her analysis of power, totalitarianism, and the nature of human activities, Arendt offers critical insights into how these systems are intertwined and why they are ultimately unsustainable. Interconnectivity and…

[commissionsdarian]

I haven't even mentioned it yet, happy month, homos and (never) home-owners

[grits-galraisedinthesouth]

"A cornation reflecting multi-faith Britain"

Charles Defender of ALL Faiths

The unprecedented joint declaration from other religious leaders reads: "Your Majesty, as neighbours in faith, we acknowledge the value of public service. We unite with people of all faiths and beliefs in thanksgiving, and in service with you for the common good."

Something that would never occur in a mosque or temple:

After the Christian coronation service, the chief rabbi will join British Muslim, Hindu, Sikh and Buddhist leaders in making a spoken declaration in unison towards their newly crowned king.

"It will be quite brief, but exceptionally powerful," Mirvis said, while stressing that he was not required to speak into an electronic microphone in the abbey, again to respect the Jewish holy day.

@hunnymae @honeytothebee

@sandiedog3 @skippyv20 @lovelycariad

"And it's not just within the Jewish faith. I know that members of other faiths as well hugely appreciate this. And now to be included in the coronation service, it's very special."

The service at Westminster Abbey will be overwhelmingly drawn from the Christian liturgy as Charles takes an oath to serve as "Defender of the (Protestant) Faith" and to protect the established Church of England.

[techdriveplay]

The Ultimate Guide to Solo Board Games

In recent years, solo board gaming has quietly emerged from the shadows of its multiplayer counterparts, carving out a distinct and vibrant niche within the board game community. Once considered a pastime for the introverted or those struggling to find a gaming group, solo board gaming has transcended these stereotypes to become a celebrated and integral aspect of the hobby. Whether due to the…

[comfortcomes]

why would you ever subject someone with actual interesting life experience and possibly an individual way of expressing themselves to an MFA program

[horsesarecreatures]

Thank you Yale thank you Harvard thank you UC Berkley thank you Stanford. <3 

[themonsterp]

The relationship  between fire and Biodiversity.

What would be the consequences for landscape, habitat or species diversity if uniform fire régimes were applied to an entire landscape?

In many parts of the world, fire is primarily perceived as a threat to human life and property and as an ecological disaster causing irreversible damages to Nature and its biodiversity. Population experience of catastrophic wildfires over the last decades in many parts of the,  fire is primarily perceived as a threat to human life and property and as an ecological disaster causing irreversible damages to Nature and its biodiversity. Population experience of catastrophic wildfires over the last decades in many parts of the world has served to reinforce this belief.

Fire is a paradox- it is both a disturbance that can cause extensive ecological damages, but it is also nature’s way to ensure the regeneration and the persistence of biological systems. Fire is an old phenomenon that has largely contributed to shape the evolution of the vegetation of many biomes. Fire is one of the main factors that helps in maintaining this precious treasure we call “Biodiversity”.

There is considerable concern about the conservation of biodiversity around the world, not only because species and habitats within these hotspots are rare, threatened of extinction, or show evolutionary uniqueness, but also of the recognition that biodiversity has an economic value.

Biodiversity directly benefits our well-being by contributing to the quality of life, supports local economies by providing food and ensures the regulation of natural processes. Over recent decades, many studies have highlighted the importance of biological diversity for enhancing ecosystem productivity and the fluxes of matter and energy such as nutrient cycling, carbon storage or hydrologic cycles.

According to the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment , global warming is about to become the overriding threat to biodiversity. Predictions of global mean surface temperature increase raise the probability of recurrent catastrophic events such as large high-intensity wildfires.  In addition to climate change, direct human activities may also cause significant changes in the fire regimes in these areas. Fire is the main ecological disturbance  and is managed differently in each area. The consequences of climate change and land use change combined with inadequate fire management may originate cascading and irreversible ecological effects resulting in a global loss of biodiversity.

Relationship between Fire and Biodiversity  and the use of fire as a tool.

Fire regime had a major influence on the diversity of life form and regenerative. Fire affects vegetation dynamics and helps to maintain the diversity of plant communities and landscapes . However, the influence of fire on the distribution and composition of vegetation patterns is moderated by interactions with the physical environment and land use.

There now is scientific consensus that fire has played an important role in the ecology and evolution of ecosystems at multiple scales and that these areas owe their floristic distribution and ecological properties to a large extent to fire. At the species level, many plants can be weakened or even destroyed by fire but many others rely on fire for their reproduction the recycling of nutrients, and the removal of dead or senescent vegetation. 

Fires can alter stand structure by killing the overstorey species, shift the patterns of plants species by modifying the biochemical processes and therefore generate new habitats within the landscape mosaic. In other words, landscape equilibrium over time relies on a suite of multidirectional post-disturbance pathways, which further contribute to shape biological diversity from the patch to the landscape level.

When fires are recurrent, the inter-fire interval becomes shorter than the time that fire-sensitive species need to produce viable seeds or to accumulate a critical seed store for self-replacement.

Unplanned fires generally generate a higher heat release than prescribed burns, which destroys shallow-buried seeds and can therefore significantly reduce the seeders pool.

There has been some development of theory on how pyrodiversity might be related to biodiversity. The ‘Pyrodiversity-Biodiversity’ paradigm states that pyrodiversity begets biodiversity. Because there is no optimal fire regime that is suitable for all species of a given habitat, landscape or ecosystem, a diversity of fire patterns that allows the co-existence of many taxa, and hence promotes biological diversity is usually advocated. 

Pyrodiversity describes the spectrum of fire regimes within any given landscape and refers to the variability in recurrence, intensity, seasonality and dimensions of fire patterns across that landscape. Pyrodiversity in all fire-prone systems is determined to a large extent by climatic conditions and terrain characteristics but also increasingly by human influences as many of the areas concerned come under increasing pressure from population growth and modified land use.

Pyrodiversity is also closely linked to the spatial distribution and arrangement of vegetation communities of different seral stages, structure and species composition. Maintenance of pyrodiversity is  central to the conservation of ecosystems associated with high ecological value. Landscape pyrodiversity encapsulates the range of spatiotemporal variability of disturbance by fire.

Human activities and fire are considered to be the main drivers of recent change in landscape patterns. Understanding how fire interacts with other processes to shape current landscape patterns and their respective biodiversity is becoming increasingly important as climates change, as the wildland–urban interface expands and as human influence on fire regimes increases. It is clear that some amount of pyrodiversity is needed for biodiversity conservation.

Land alteration and/or management practices that decrease landscape complexity such as fire suppression or land abandonment, may create landscapes that are prone to larger, more intense fires. Pyrodiversity describes the spectrum of fire regimes within any given landscape and refers to the variability in recurrence, intensity, seasonality and dimensions of fire patterns across that landscape. Landscape pyrodiversity has a clearly discernible influence on the degree of compositional change between and within mosaic of habitats within the landscape. High pyrodiversity promotes landscape heterogeneity and thereby high beta diversity.

Although many efforts have been dedicated to the protection and conservation of plant species, we are currently facing a loss of biodiversity around the world, with some of the most threatened habitats being in Ecosystems.

Understanding how variations of biodiversity will affect ecosystems processes becomes essential if we want to preserve the ecosystem services essential for human well-being.

Fire is considered one of the main drivers of plant diversity. Plant communities are considered to have high resilience to fire and are adapted to fire regimes through plant traits such as resprouting, seed germination by heat-shock and smoke and fruit serotiny.

Functional diversity defines the variability of groups of species that use the same resources and respond to the environment in a similar way. Each plant trait is expected to play a specific function role that contributes to the sustainability of ecosystem processes.

Does pyrodiversity begets biodiversity?

Our perception of the effects of fire on the environment depends on the scale we consider this phenomenon. A single fire event may have severe short-term impacts on the diversity of plant species, killing most of obligatory seed regenerating plant species, but if we extend the time window it appears that fire may be the only way to ensure reproduction through stimulating regeneration . Similarly, when considering different spatial scales, the effects of fire on the diversity of a forest stand may be compensated at the regional scale by the occurrence of similar taxa in other habitats.If landscape diversity is defined as the combination of the number of vegetation types or landscape richness) and the degree of spatial heterogeneity , high pyrodiversity promotes regional landscape diversity.  Pyrodiversity begets plant diversity from the species to the landscape level. The need for improved knowledge of the pyrodiversity requirements of other taxonomic groups to improve our understanding of the ecological role of fire and develop an appropriate and integrated fire management approach in fire-prone landscapes.

Depending on targeted conservation objectives , conservation agencies need to be able to adapt their fire policy, whether using prescribed burning as a surrogate for wildfires or by re-thinking the current fire suppression policy to meet biodiversity conservation objectives.

Fire is definitely a hot topic surrounded by many misbelieves from the public side and a burning issue much debated by the scientific community. This diversity of opinions enriches our cultural, social and ecological perception of this phenomenon. Unfortunately human societies have nowadays a harsh dilemma to deal with the environment as we see it today is the product of fire, but we cannot tolerate fire in this environment to the degree that we have lived with it in the past or to the degree that is required to maintain biodiversity. Thus, in a way, fire challenges how we connect to our environment and questions how we perceive Nature. Legislation and incentives that support excessive protectionism and overlook the historical importance of the fire regime do not contribute to save this natural legacy. To the other extreme, excessive human interventionism that begets inappropriate fire management strategies may lead to reversible impacts on biodiversity.

Made by @themonsterp and inspired by Nicolas Faivre – Which pirodiversity for what biodiversity.

[1ore]

im already doing PR work for fungi, hiveminds, and parasites with the endeme but what if i did PR for crop pest species too. im thinking about tyranids and zerglings and how they hold up a mirror to colonial settler fears. you are afraid of everything the eye can see being extracted by a foreign invader? of the very landscape around you becoming biologically, functionally, culturally, socially uniform? what if the terrible things i did to other people... happened 2 me....

the endeme keys into impaired ecosystems that are artificially kept in the first stages of succession, and that's the reason it is monstrous and scary 'successful' (like most weeds and pioneer species, it is not competitive and becomes second banana to whoever comes after it.) but i think it would be funny to meet it from the other end and play off of fungal and viral crop diseases. maybe there are some funny little guys who are, like, not a big deal until you put a monoculture in front of them. like normally there isn't a giant interstellar bug in the sky but you razed + converted an entire planet into its favorite food. what did you expect.