#Crisis in Utopia

[tomoleary]

Hubert Rogers (1898-1982) Crisis in Utopia (1940) Source

[thenwothm]

EXCLUSIVE INTERVIEW: JAMES-PAUL LUNA OF INTRANCED

Having been in a number of phenomenal bands like White Wizzard, Holy-Grail and now the hard rocking Intranced, the very talented and seasoned vocalist James-Paul Luna is a certainly a man with plenty of interesting stories to tell. With such a rich history we could not pass on the opportunity to interview the man himself… I absolutely love to interview bands and artists and discover more about…

[bckalleycat]

petition to implement solar powered public transportation

[astralhope]

Yuma beings Astral's main concern even when Astral himself is in danger.

[theoreticallysensible]

“Despair, it seems, is hope’s deepest well… During the crises of capitalism and climate, despite the “vast bureaucratic apparatus for the creation and maintenance of hopelessness” [quoting David Graeber] to which we are captive, there has been no shortage of alternative futures, not all of them alarmist or apocalyptic… Visions of a new social order after capitalism abound. If these are not signs of hope, what is?”

- S.D. Chrostowska, Utopia in the Age of Survival: Between Myth and Politics

I love that final question, in how it’s ambiguous whether it’s just pointing out that people have hope, or whether it’s saying that (because of this?) we should also have hope, because there really is a chance for a better world!

[im-getting-help]

i can't find the motivation to keep going guys!! i think i lost it a while ago but i didn't notice lol i think it probably slipped that time i lost my wallet? idk

[bumblebeeappletree]

Get 40% off Nebula using my link: https://go.nebula.tv/occ

Watch my bonus climate short story video here: https://nebula.tv/videos/occ-heres-wh...

Watch next month's video on China's climate impact here: https://nebula.tv/videos/occ-is-china...

Sign up for a lifetime Nebula subscription for a limited time at http://go.nebula.tv/lifetime?ref=occ

In this Our Changing Climate climate change video essay, I look at the importance of speculative climate fiction, sci-fi, and utopias for political movements. Specifically, I look at various short stories, films, and books that introduce us to worlds beyond capitalism, that have, in their own way addressed our ecological and climate crisis.

Help me make more videos like this via Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/OurChangingCl...

Email List: https://ourchangingclimateocc.substac...

Twitter: https://twitter.com/OurClimateNow

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/occvideos/

Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/occ.climate/

Reddit: www.reddit.com/r/OurChangingClimate/

_______________________

For music, I use Artlist. You can get 2 months free with this link: https://artlist.io/artlist-70446/?art...

For stock footage, I use Artgrid. You can get 2 months free with this link: https://artgrid.io/Artgrid-114820/?ar...

I also use Epidemic Sound for some of my music: http://epidemicsound.com/creator

Some visuals courtesy of Getty Images

_______________________

Timestamps:

0:00 - Intro

1:49 - Should We Dream of the Future?

5:09 - Visions of the Future

16:29 - Building Futures

_______________________

Check out other Climate YouTubers:

Climate in Colour: / @climateincolour1273

zentouro: / zentouro

Climate Adam: / climateadam

Kurtis Baute: / @scopeofscience

Levi Hildebrand: / the100lh

Simon Clark: / simonoxfphys

Sarah Karver: / @sarahkarver

Climate Town: / @climatetown

Jack Harries: / jacksgap

Beckisphere: / @beckisphere

All About Climate: / @allaboutclimate

Aime Maggie: / @aimemaggie

Just Have a Think: / @justhaveathink

Ankur Shah: / ankurshah

Planet Proof: / @planetproofofficial

Future Proof: / futureprooftv

_______________________

Further Reading and Resources: https://fascinated-soccer-ac0.notion....

#climatechange #sciencefiction #art

[dererumnatura-0]

Every trustable authority society once listened to is saying the word:

Genocide.

Every imperialist, from overt slave state to wage-slave state, is attempting to make it as if it’s the normal due course of business: this genocide and these child disappearances and subsequent mass enslavements of some sort or another. They want us to accept this and be defeated in spirit.

They have a spirituality like a Caste system, so fatalistic. Where they both hate theirself and don’t know theirself either. Where they hate ambiently because ‘who doesn’t’ as if the only way to socialize is the phony comedy that just makes fun of people using outdated & never ok stereotypes. They think love and kindness are phony traits children use to get spoiled, because the only time they are kind to others is when they are using them. They live in a Usury world, called capitalism. How many of these people were molested or raised by the narcissist dysfunction that precipitates from the mass pedophilia enacted by the Catholic Church, Boy Scouts, & not to mention the pedo rings the State deals in for its secrets. Note that State has no state lines. It’s the centralizing force, which is what makes it fascist, that it would subdue or caste away the wilderness within you (within them too). The result of childhood use, abuse & neglect. I do hold some sorrow for them.

Meanwhile there’s the sorrow of the masses.. 3 elucidating factoids from David Graeber’s Debt, a 5K year History:

1) Often times throughout history, usually-white (white-capped, I say) Christians have economically positioned people of other religions, particularly those of Jewish origin, to be their bankers primarily and specifically Using them to perform usury through banking, usary being forbidden in Christianity.

2&furthermore) Graeber points out an old axiom: While if you owe the bank 100K the bank may own you, if you owe the bank 100Million then you own the bank.. which clarifies to me how that economic positioning continues to this day and in current affairs and makes obvious why the Erik Princes of the world have their war drums thumping. So, while “all wars are bankers’ wars,” the bank may not call its own shots.

3) 💖Just wrapping everything into a nice package for me, Graeber clarifies why the UAE is funding genocide in Sudan (and stealing their children and women) and why the US has seen a resurgence in patriarchy. He says that the Bible of capitalism, “The Wealth of Nations” by Adam Smith, is almost a grab bag from ancient Islamic spirituality. This also explains why the current surge in military patriarchy is so aligned with these emperors of oil, not to mention convenient real estate deals. But, students of economics, did you know that Adam Smith knew lobbying would destroy his delicate version of capitalist utopia. Adam Smith knew lobbying would destroy democracy..

So, Beware the white Christian apocalypse project involving fake ufos, widespread profiteer wars, and ambient hate. Men taking more than they give just because they can. Disassociation and hypervigilance, neighbors spying or being told to spy. The allowed poisoning. This pergatory of Earth.

✨ Love, that is why we cry, because it is all you can do for humans. It is all you can do for the ones who wish to subdue us. Some would eat what eats them. I can’t change them, I can only show them what love is by example: What it is to love this planet, this life, the absurdity & diversity & chaos. What it is to love all of nature. Grow your wilderness 💖🍀✨

[if-you-fan-a-fire]

"COMMITTEE FAVORS SELECTING JOBLESS TO WORK ON FARMS," Toronto Globe. April 12, 1933. Page 11. --- Motion Sponsored by Fraleigh and Newman Referred to Henry ---- MANY SPEAKERS HEARD ---- The Committee on Agriculture went on record yesterday in Queen's Park as favoring selection of unemployed men who would work on farms for board and lodging, with a minimum wage to be paid by the Ontario Government, and the organizing of others unemployed for other public services. The motion, sponsored by H. T. Fraleigh (Conservative, Lambton East) and William Newman (Liberal, Victoria North), is referred to Premier Henry for consideration.

Another resolution sponsored by Mr. Fraleigh and J. A. Craig (Conservative, Lanark North) urges Hon. T. L. Kennedy, Provincial Minister of Agriculture, to continue his efforts in conjunction with the Federal Minister in pursuing a further policy to aid the marketing of live stock.

Financial Aid Sought. H. L. Craise, President; W. W. Robinson, Vice-President; and C. I. Delworth and E. J. Atkins of the Fruit Marketing Council, sought aid of the committee in obtaining financial assistance of the Government to carry on their work. The efforts of the board in obtaining markets for produce which might have overflooded Ontario markets, was stressed and compulsory registration of growers urged. If the latter was possible, a fee would take care of the operation of the Council, it was explained. The question was left to the Minister to deal with.

Special speakers addressed the committee on timely subjects. D. А. Campbell, live stock shipping agent, of Montreal, reviewed export costs and told the committee of the various types of cattle suitable for the British market; J. M. McCallum, Chief of Stock Yards Service for the Federal Government, read an extensive address on "Export Cattle"; and F. C. Fletcher, General Manager of the Union Stock Yards, spoke on stock yards' service.

Reports Tabled. A comprehensive report and several recommendations were tabled by W. J. Bragg (Liberal, Durham), Chairman of the Subcommittee on Fruits and Vegetables. Other reports were received on live stock, from Mr. Fraleigh; on dairy products and egg- grading, from Chairman James A. Sanderson (Conservative, Grenville); and on colonization, from Hon. Dr. Paul Poisson, Chairman of that special group.

The several subcommittees were praised by Chairman J. E. Jamieson (Simcoe, Southwest) for the labor and time they had put on their several reports. Chairman Jamieson's report will be tabled in the House today.

[rodaportal]

French Immigration Bill: "Expelling All Foreigners Who Commit Crimes"

Join the dialogue on France's new immigration bill! Explore the intricacies and debates surrounding the proposed legislation in our latest YouTube video, 'France Immigration Bill: "Expelling All Foreigners Who Commit Crimes"'. 🌍✨

Discover the impact on migrant rights and the delicate balance between security and human rights.

🔍 Watch now to stay informed:

Like, share, and let your voice be heard! Your engagement shapes the future. 🗣️✊ #france #frenchnewbill #migration #asylum

[the-nyanguard-party]

the imperial core has a very limited to nonexistent revolutionary potential right now and are generally unreliable: true, i am a known holder of this stance and i think it follows from theory and is verified by empirical evidence

however there are still internal contradictions (there is still working class dissatisfaction with capitalism, the core is not a post-scarcity egalitarian utopia) that communists can work with for smaller scale goals that benefit the movement in the long run (like disrupting the arming of zionists - there is a basis for this, people do already express their dissatisfaction with it and try to protest it from time to time just in a disorganized and easily supressed or coopted manner) and provide experience in organizing that prepares for a future where intensified contradictions can be taken advantage of - a crisis of imperialism, inter-imperialist war...

i think you should take criticism of the lack of revolutionary potential of the imperial core as a challenge rather than as an excuse

[erstwhilesparrow]

unrelated to anything else except for maybe the fact that i just woke up i am still thinking about bigb double life session 3. why was he like that. why did any of those things happen. he had a sword in his hand nearly the entire time. bigb i'm obsessed with you

[foone]

All this Kurtzman/Section 31 stuff reminds me that not enough people have seen (or understood, I guess) Star Trek:Deep Space Nine.

Because it gets described as "it made the Federation a morally gray society instead of a utopia!" or "it fought back against Roddenberry's vision for the Federation and Star Trek!" and it's like... did you watch the same show?

DS9 didn't think the federation was any less of a utopia, than TNG or TOS or VOY, it said EVEN IN A UTOPIA, THERE WILL BE CHALLENGES, THERE WILL BE USURPERS, THERE WILL BE SNAKES IN THE GARDEN: THAT IS WHY WE MUST FIGHT!

Homefront/Paradise lost are about how even in a utopia, authoritarians will sell fear and get people to give up their freedoms. Fascists will burn the Reichstag to create a crisis they can exploit.

Doctor Bashir, I Presume showed that for a society without money, people still worry about success, and their legacy, and they'll do horrible things to their children to make sure they can be that legacy. And the episode CLEARLY DISAPPROVES OF THIS! The man responsible realizes the error of his ways and submits to punishment to save his son.

I don't want to list examples all day, I have other stuff to do, but DS9 very much didn't say "utopias aren't real, every so-called utopia has evil somewhere in the foundations", it said that utopias are something you have to fight to maintain. You can't take the easy answers, listen to the fascists promising safety, and avoid examining the faults of your society. Sorry. But the good news is that you can, you can win, and you aren't alone.

DS9 was aiming for more of a "realistic utopia" than other Treks, it's true, but despite that realism it still said a utopia was possible. It used that realism to show that a better world must still be fought for. And it warned against anyone selling easy solutions to those battles.

Because as has been pointed out recently, fascists don't sell eternal war and oppression to the in-group: they promise safety and power and belonging and prosperity. They're gonna oppress them to save us.

DS9 said those men are not to be trusted, and must be opposed. It won't be easy, there will be struggles, but they will be stopped. The world will get better. We can do this, together.

I don't know about you, but I find that more optimistic than if they hadn't, and just said The Federation is Perfect Forever.

[letialia]

“Il nostro è certamente il Paese delle grandi abboffate e del clima da cartolina, ma al giorno d’oggi quest’ultimo è frutto di un riscaldamento della temperatura che rende roventi le estati e tiepidi gli inverni. Il caldo si diffonde già con le prime avvisaglie del mese di febbraio e si trascina oltre ottobre.”

«Sindaco, lei lavora per una città che entro trent’anni avrà il clima di Tunisi, le cui case non sono state progettate per il clima di Tunisi. L’anno scorso mi sono trasferita a Firenze e speravo di innamorarmi della sua città, invece dopo dieci mesi sono scappata […] Non è una città per cittadini […] È una città completamente asservita al turismo di massa e non ti fa sentire a casa, non ti fa sentire la benvenuta. Trovare una casa è stato un incubo, ogni spazio pubblico è stato privatizzato ed è dedicato a catene di fast fashion e fast food […] Nardella, visto che sono serviti cinquemila litri d’acqua per pulire la facciata di Palazzo Vecchio, ci fa due conti e ci dice quanta acqua serve per mantenere in piedi tutta questa giostra meravigliosa che è Firenze? Ci fa anche due analisi dell’Arno e ci dice cosa ci ha sversato dentro?». (Pomiato, A., in Siamomine 2023)

[trans-axolotl]

i have interesting conversations sometimes with people who frame questions about psych abolition as "what will xyz look like in the post-psych world" or "how will antipsychiatrists make sure that mad people get their needs met once the psych system is destroyed" and so on.

it reflects this fairly common idea I've encountered, mostly by people who are newer to antipsych ideas, who believe that psych abolition is going to happen as some sort of single event, as this discrete moment where later, we'll be able to point to it and say this is where everything changed. That there will be one point where we deinstitutionalized or decriminalized drugs or got rid of restraint or whatever accomplishment it is. and to be fair, there are some of those watershed moments—I could point at Basaglia and the democratic psychiatry movement, the movimento antimanicomial, the Socialist Patients Collective, and a few other sticking points of psych resistance throughout the past couple hundred years. it's not like there aren't moments where there is such a monumental shift that it makes sense to classify it with a Before and an After.

part of this mindset makes me consider how so often in antipsych spaces, we (rightfully) focus a lot of our energy on highlighting the extent of the violence that occurs on the whole continuum of psychiatric care. it's hard to find words to express the horrors of solitary confinement, restraint, institutionalized sexual assault, confinement, coercive drugging—the list goes on and on. When we're so often dismissed with rhetoric telling us that we are broken/unsafe/mad in need of cure/removal/confinement—it feels desperately, urgently needed to shout as loudly as we can that the violence we are surviving is real, that is is common, and that it should not happen to anyone, regardless if we're incarcerated in prisons, jails, psych wards, or residential treatment facilities.

and at the same time, I think that sometimes we forget that even amidst the overwhelming layers of harm and abuse, there are still so many ways that psych survivors are already, every day, exhaustingly fighting back. it stands out to me that in every psych ward i've ever been locked up in, that there is always a parallel world of in-jokes and advice and rituals and fantasies and histories and community norms completely separate from the understanding of any of the psych professionals who think they run the place.

So often when I talk about the violence of psych incarceration I talk about the harm of being removed, disappeared, and cut off from the world; at the same time, there is always a simultaneous lively, active, and chaotic world inside built by patients that directly challenges the claims by psychiatrists that our madness makes us fundamentally incapable of participating in society. The patient-world in the psych ward might not be coherent, it might not be anywhere close to a utopia--but it is a world built by the psychiatrized, for the psychiatrized, taking the hostile conditions we are placed into and shaping the parts of it we can reach into something all our own.

Fundamentally, psych abolition is about what we are doing Right Now—it doesn't require us to wait for the End Of Psychiatry before it becomes real. I know psych abolition is possible because it already exists—I find it in the corners of psych wards, where intimate conversations are hidden from the view of cameras. I find it every time someone hides meds under their tongue, sneaks in contraband, and refuses to go quietly into restraint. I find it every time a group of friends gets together to do informal suicide watch so that no one has to call mobile crisis and the cops, fundraises to build a new peer respite, and creates a hotline that doesn't do nonconsensual interventions from cops/licensed professionals with the power to incarcerate.

I know psych abolition is possible because every fucking day, there are already people fighting back and making abolition real, even if only for a little while. My allegiance will always be with the psychiatrized, the mad, those who are labeled under many different pathways that end in "deviant," who remind us that there is a path towards resistance because it is a path that is already happening.

[mostlysignssomeportents]

Autoenshittification

Forget F1: the only car race that matters now is the race to turn your car into a digital extraction machine, a high-speed inkjet printer on wheels, stealing your private data as it picks your pocket. Your car’s digital infrastructure is a costly, dangerous nightmare — but for automakers in pursuit of postcapitalist utopia, it’s a dream they can’t give up on.

Your car is stuffed full of microchips, a fact the world came to appreciate after the pandemic struck and auto production ground to a halt due to chip shortages. Of course, that wasn’t the whole story: when the pandemic started, the automakers panicked and canceled their chip orders, only to immediately regret that decision and place new orders.

But it was too late: semiconductor production had taken a serious body-blow, and when Big Car placed its new chip orders, it went to the back of a long, slow-moving line. It was a catastrophic bungle: microchips are so integral to car production that a car is basically a computer network on wheels that you stick your fragile human body into and pray.

The car manufacturers got so desperate for chips that they started buying up washing machines for the microchips in them, extracting the chips and discarding the washing machines like some absurdo-dystopian cyberpunk walnut-shelling machine:

https://www.autoevolution.com/news/desperate-times-companies-buy-washing-machines-just-to-rip-out-the-chips-187033.html

These digital systems are a huge problem for the car companies. They are the underlying cause of a precipitous decline in car quality. From touch-based digital door-locks to networked sensors and cameras, every digital system in your car is a source of endless repair nightmares, costly recalls and cybersecurity vulnerabilities:

https://www.reuters.com/business/autos-transportation/quality-new-vehicles-us-declining-more-tech-use-study-shows-2023-06-22/

What’s more, drivers hate all the digital bullshit, from the janky touchscreens to the shitty, wildly insecure apps. Digital systems are drivers’ most significant point of dissatisfaction with the automakers’ products:

https://www.theverge.com/23801545/car-infotainment-customer-satisifaction-survey-jd-power

Even the automakers sorta-kinda admit that this is a problem. Back in 2020 when Massachusetts was having a Right-to-Repair ballot initiative, Big Car ran these unfuckingbelievable scare ads that basically said, “Your car spies on you so comprehensively that giving anyone else access to its systems will let murderers stalk you to your home and kill you:

https://pluralistic.net/2020/09/03/rip-david-graeber/#rolling-surveillance-platforms

But even amid all the complaining about cars getting stuck in the Internet of Shit, there’s still not much discussion of why the car-makers are making their products less attractive, less reliable, less safe, and less resilient by stuffing them full of microchips. Are car execs just the latest generation of rubes who’ve been suckered by Silicon Valley bullshit and convinced that apps are a magic path to profitability?

Nope. Car execs are sophisticated businesspeople, and they’re surfing capitalism’s latest — and last — hot trend: dismantling capitalism itself.

Now, leftists have been predicting the death of capitalism since The Communist Manifesto, but even Marx and Engels warned us not to get too frisky: capitalism, they wrote, is endlessly creative, constantly reinventing itself, re-emerging from each crisis in a new form that is perfectly adapted to the post-crisis reality:

https://www.nytimes.com/2022/10/31/books/review/a-spectre-haunting-china-mieville.html

But capitalism has finally run out of gas. In his forthcoming book, Techno Feudalism: What Killed Capitalism, Yanis Varoufakis proposes that capitalism has died — but it wasn’t replaced by socialism. Rather, capitalism has given way to feudalism:

https://www.penguin.co.uk/books/451795/technofeudalism-by-varoufakis-yanis/9781847927279

Under capitalism, capital is the prime mover. The people who own and mobilize capital — the capitalists — organize the economy and take the lion’s share of its returns. But it wasn’t always this way: for hundreds of years, European civilization was dominated by rents, not markets.

A “rent” is income that you get from owning something that other people need to produce value. Think of renting out a house you own: not only do you get paid when someone pays you to live there, you also get the benefit of rising property values, which are the result of the work that all the other homeowners, business owners, and residents do to make the neighborhood more valuable.

The first capitalists hated rent. They wanted to replace the “passive income” that landowners got from taxing their serfs’ harvest with active income from enclosing those lands and grazing sheep in order to get wool to feed to the new textile mills. They wanted active income — and lots of it.

Capitalist philosophers railed against rent. The “free market” of Adam Smith wasn’t a market that was free from regulation — it was a market free from rents. The reason Smith railed against monopolists is because he (correctly) understood that once a monopoly emerged, it would become a chokepoint through which a rentier could cream off the profits he considered the capitalist’s due:

https://locusmag.com/2021/03/cory-doctorow-free-markets/

Today, we live in a rentier’s paradise. People don’t aspire to create value — they aspire to capture it. In Survival of the Richest, Doug Rushkoff calls this “going meta”: don’t provide a service, just figure out a way to interpose yourself between the provider and the customer:

https://pluralistic.net/2022/09/13/collapse-porn/#collapse-porn

Don’t drive a cab, create Uber and extract value from every driver and rider. Better still: don’t found Uber, invest in Uber options and extract value from the people who invest in Uber. Even better, invest in derivatives of Uber options and extract value from people extracting value from people investing in Uber, who extract value from drivers and riders. Go meta.

This is your brain on the four-hour-work-week, passive income mind-virus. In Techno Feudalism, Varoufakis deftly describes how the new “Cloud Capital” has created a new generation of rentiers, and how they have become the richest, most powerful people in human history.

Shopping at Amazon is like visiting a bustling city center full of stores — but each of those stores’ owners has to pay the majority of every sale to a feudal landlord, Emperor Jeff Bezos, who also decides which goods they can sell and where they must appear on the shelves. Amazon is full of capitalists, but it is not a capitalist enterprise. It’s a feudal one:

https://pluralistic.net/2022/11/28/enshittification/#relentless-payola

This is the reason that automakers are willing to enshittify their products so comprehensively: they were one of the first industries to decouple rents from profits. Recall that the reason that Big Car needed billions in bailouts in 2008 is that they’d reinvented themselves as loan-sharks who incidentally made cars, lending money to car-buyers and then “securitizing” the loans so they could be traded in the capital markets.

Even though this strategy brought the car companies to the brink of ruin, it paid off in the long run. The car makers got billions in public money, paid their execs massive bonuses, gave billions to shareholders in buybacks and dividends, smashed their unions, fucked their pensioned workers, and shipped jobs anywhere they could pollute and murder their workforce with impunity.

Car companies are on the forefront of postcapitalism, and they understand that digital is the key to rent-extraction. Remember when BMW announced that it was going to rent you the seatwarmer in your own fucking car?

https://pluralistic.net/2020/07/02/big-river/#beemers

Not to be outdone, Mercedes announced that they were going to rent you your car’s accelerator pedal, charging an extra $1200/year to unlock a fully functional acceleration curve:

https://www.theverge.com/2022/11/23/23474969/mercedes-car-subscription-faster-acceleration-feature-price

This is the urinary tract infection business model: without digitization, all your car’s value flowed in a healthy stream. But once the car-makers add semiconductors, each one of those features comes out in a painful, burning dribble, with every button on that fakakta touchscreen wired directly into your credit-card.

But it’s just for starters. Computers are malleable. The only computer we know how to make is the Turing Complete Von Neumann Machine, which can run every program we know how to write. Once they add networked computers to your car, the Car Lords can endlessly twiddle the knobs on the back end, finding new ways to extract value from you:

https://doctorow.medium.com/twiddler-1b5c9690cce6

That means that your car can track your every movement, and sell your location data to anyone and everyone, from marketers to bounty-hunters looking to collect fees for tracking down people who travel out of state for abortions to cops to foreign spies:

https://www.vice.com/en/article/n7enex/tool-shows-if-car-selling-data-privacy4cars-vehicle-privacy-report

Digitization supercharges financialization. It lets car-makers offer subprime auto-loans to desperate, poor people and then killswitch their cars if they miss a payment:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4U2eDJnwz_s

Subprime lending for cars would be a terrible business without computers, but digitization makes it a great source of feudal rents. Car dealers can originate loans to people with teaser rates that quickly blow up into payments the dealer knows their customer can’t afford. Then they repo the car and sell it to another desperate person, and another, and another:

https://pluralistic.net/2022/07/27/boricua/#looking-for-the-joke-with-a-microscope

Digitization also opens up more exotic options. Some subprime cars have secondary control systems wired into their entertainment system: miss a payment and your car radio flips to full volume and bellows an unstoppable, unmutable stream of threats. Tesla does one better: your car will lock and immobilize itself, then blare its horn and back out of its parking spot when the repo man arrives:

https://tiremeetsroad.com/2021/03/18/tesla-allegedly-remotely-unlocks-model-3-owners-car-uses-smart-summon-to-help-repo-agent/

Digital feudalism hasn’t stopped innovating — it’s just stopped innovating good things. The digital device is an endless source of sadistic novelties, like the cellphones that disable your most-used app the first day you’re late on a payment, then work their way down the other apps you rely on for every day you’re late:

https://restofworld.org/2021/loans-that-hijack-your-phone-are-coming-to-india/

Usurers have always relied on this kind of imaginative intimidation. The loan-shark’s arm-breaker knows you’re never going to get off the hook; his goal is in intimidating you into paying his boss first, liquidating your house and your kid’s college fund and your wedding ring before you default and he throws you off a building.

Thanks to the malleability of computerized systems, digital arm-breakers have an endless array of options they can deploy to motivate you into paying them first, no matter what it costs you:

https://pluralistic.net/2021/04/02/innovation-unlocks-markets/#digital-arm-breakers

Car-makers are trailblazers in imaginative rent-extraction. Take VIN-locking: this is the practice of adding cheap microchips to engine components that communicate with the car’s overall network. After a new part is installed in your car, your car’s computer does a complex cryptographic handshake with the part that requires an unlock code provided by an authorized technician. If the code isn’t entered, the car refuses to use that part.

VIN-locking has exploded in popularity. It’s in your iPhone, preventing you from using refurb or third-party replacement parts:

https://doctorow.medium.com/apples-cement-overshoes-329856288d13

It’s in fuckin’ ventilators, which was a nightmare during lockdown as hospital techs nursed their precious ventilators along by swapping parts from dead systems into serviceable ones:

https://www.vice.com/en/article/3azv9b/why-repair-techs-are-hacking-ventilators-with-diy-dongles-from-poland

And of course, it’s in tractors, along with other forms of remote killswitch. Remember that feelgood story about John Deere bricking the looted Ukrainian tractors whose snitch-chips showed they’d been relocated to Russia?

https://doctorow.medium.com/about-those-kill-switched-ukrainian-tractors-bc93f471b9c8

That wasn’t a happy story — it was a cautionary tale. After all, John Deere now controls the majority of the world’s agricultural future, and they’ve boobytrapped those ubiquitous tractors with killswitches that can be activated by anyone who hacks, takes over, or suborns Deere or its dealerships.

Control over repair isn’t limited to gouging customers on parts and service. When a company gets to decide whether your device can be fixed, it can fuck you over in all kinds of ways. Back in 2019, Tim Apple told his shareholders to expect lower revenues because people were opting to fix their phones rather than replace them:

https://www.apple.com/newsroom/2019/01/letter-from-tim-cook-to-apple-investors/

By usurping your right to decide who fixes your phone, Apple gets to decide whether you can fix it, or whether you must replace it. Problem solved — and not just for Apple, but for car makers, tractor makers, ventilator makers and more. Apple leads on this, even ahead of Big Car, pioneering a “recycling” program that sees trade-in phones shredded so they can’t possibly be diverted from an e-waste dump and mined for parts:

https://www.vice.com/en/article/yp73jw/apple-recycling-iphones-macbooks

John Deere isn’t sleeping on this. They’ve come up with a valuable treasure they extract when they win the Right-to-Repair: Deere singles out farmers who complain about its policies and refuses to repair their tractors, stranding them with six-figure, two-ton paperweight:

https://pluralistic.net/2022/05/31/dealers-choice/#be-a-shame-if-something-were-to-happen-to-it

The repair wars are just a skirmish in a vast, invisible fight that’s been waged for decades: the War On General-Purpose Computing, where tech companies use the law to make it illegal for you to reconfigure your devices so they serve you, rather than their shareholders:

https://memex.craphound.com/2012/01/10/lockdown-the-coming-war-on-general-purpose-computing/

The force behind this army is vast and grows larger every day. General purpose computers are antithetical to technofeudalism — all the rents extracted by technofeudalists would go away if others (tinkereres, co-ops, even capitalists!) were allowed to reconfigure our devices so they serve us.

You’ve probably noticed the skirmishes with inkjet printer makers, who can only force you to buy their ink at 20,000% markups if they can stop you from deciding how your printer is configured:

https://pluralistic.net/2022/08/07/inky-wretches/#epson-salty But we’re also fighting against insulin pump makers, who want to turn people with diabetes into walking inkjet printers:

https://pluralistic.net/2022/06/10/loopers/#hp-ification

And companies that make powered wheelchairs:

https://pluralistic.net/2022/06/08/chair-ish/#r2r

These companies start with people who have the least agency and social power and wreck their lives, then work their way up the privilege gradient, coming for everyone else. It’s called the “shitty technology adoption curve”:

https://pluralistic.net/2022/08/21/great-taylors-ghost/#solidarity-or-bust

Technofeudalism is the public-private-partnership from hell, emerging from a combination of state and private action. On the one hand, bailing out bankers and big business (rather than workers) after the 2008 crash and the covid lockdown decoupled income from profits. Companies spent billions more than they earned were still wildly profitable, thanks to those public funds.

But there’s also a policy dimension here. Some of those rentiers’ billions were mobilized to both deconstruct antitrust law (allowing bigger and bigger companies and cartels) and to expand “IP” law, turning “IP” into a toolsuite for controlling the conduct of a firm’s competitors, critics and customers:

https://locusmag.com/2020/09/cory-doctorow-ip/

IP is key to understanding the rise of technofeudalism. The same malleability that allows companies to “twiddle” the knobs on their services and keep us on the hook as they reel us in would hypothetically allow us to countertwiddle, seizing the means of computation:

https://pluralistic.net/2023/04/12/algorithmic-wage-discrimination/#fishers-of-men

The thing that stands between you and an alternative app store, an interoperable social media network that you can escape to while continuing to message the friends you left behind, or a car that anyone can fix or unlock features for is IP, not technology. Under capitalism, that technology would already exist, because capitalists have no loyalty to one another and view each other’s margins as their own opportunities.

But under technofeudalism, control comes from rents (owning things), not profits (selling things). The capitalist who wants to participate in your iPhone’s “ecosystem” has to make apps and submit them to Apple, along with 30% of their lifetime revenues — they don’t get to sell you jailbreaking kit that lets you choose their app store.

Rent-seeking technology has a holy grail: control over “ring zero” — the ability to compel you to configure your computer to a feudalist’s specifications, and to verify that you haven’t altered your computer after it came into your possession:

https://pluralistic.net/2022/01/30/ring-minus-one/#drm-political-economy

For more than two decades, various would-be feudal lords and their court sorcerers have been pitching ways of doing this, of varying degrees of outlandishness.

At core, here’s what they envision: inside your computer, they will nest another computer, one that is designed to run a very simple set of programs, none of which can be altered once it leaves the factory. This computer — either a whole separate chip called a “Trusted Platform Module” or a region of your main processor called a secure enclave — can tally observations about your computer: which operating system, modules and programs it’s running.

Then it can cryptographically “sign” these observations, proving that they were made by a secure chip and not by something you could have modified. Then you can send this signed “attestation” to someone else, who can use it to determine how your computer is configured and thus whether to trust it. This is called “remote attestation.”

There are some cool things you can do with remote attestation: for example, two strangers playing a networked video game together can use attestations to make sure neither is running any cheat modules. Or you could require your cloud computing provider to use attestations that they aren’t stealing your data from the server you’re renting. Or if you suspect that your computer has been infected with malware, you can connect to someone else and send them an attestation that they can use to figure out whether you should trust it.

Today, there’s a cool remote attestation technology called “PrivacyPass” that replaces CAPTCHAs by having you prove to your own device that you are a human. When a server wants to make sure you’re a person, it sends a random number to your device, which signs that number along with its promise that it is acting on behalf of a human being, and sends it back. CAPTCHAs are all kinds of bad — bad for accessibility and privacy — and this is really great.

But the billions that have been thrown at remote attestation over the decades is only incidentally about solving CAPTCHAs or verifying your cloud server. The holy grail here is being able to make sure that you’re not running an ad-blocker. It’s being able to remotely verify that you haven’t disabled the bossware your employer requires. It’s the power to block someone from opening an Office365 doc with LibreOffice. It’s your boss’s ability to ensure that you haven’t modified your messaging client to disable disappearing messages before he sends you an auto-destructing memo ordering you to break the law.

And there’s a new remote attestation technology making the rounds: Google’s Web Environment Integrity, which will leverage Google’s dominance over browsers to allow websites to block users who run ad-blockers:

https://github.com/RupertBenWiser/Web-Environment-Integrity

There’s plenty else WEI can do (it would make detecting ad-fraud much easier), but for every legitimate use, there are a hundred ways this could be abused. It’s a technology purpose-built to allow rent extraction by stripping us of our right to technological self-determination.

Releasing a technology like this into a world where companies are willing to make their products less reliable, less attractive, less safe and less resilient in pursuit of rents is incredibly reckless and shortsighted. You want unauthorized bread? This is how you get Unauthorized Bread:

https://arstechnica.com/gaming/2020/01/unauthorized-bread-a-near-future-tale-of-refugees-and-sinister-iot-appliances/amp/

If you'd like an essay-formatted version of this thread to read or share, here's a link to it on pluralistic.net, my surveillance-free, ad-free, tracker-free blog:

https://pluralistic.net/2023/07/24/rent-to-pwn/#kitt-is-a-demon

[Image ID: The interior of a luxury car. There is a dagger protruding from the steering wheel. The entertainment console has been replaced by the text 'You wouldn't download a car,' in MPAA scare-ad font. Outside of the windscreen looms the Matrix waterfall effect. Visible in the rear- and side-view mirror is the driver: the figure from Munch's 'Scream.' The screen behind the steering-wheel has been replaced by the menacing red eye of HAL9000 from Stanley Kubrick's '2001: A Space Odyssey.']

Image: Cryteria (modified) https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:HAL9000.svg

CC BY 3.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/deed.en