#Anti Evade

[magiamemoriareview]

Phantom Thief Karin's Scheme

Obtainability: This is a personal memoria for Karin Misono. It is obtainable through completing the third episode of her Magical Girl Story and through the Support Gacha.  

Single Effect: Anti-Evade [100%] (Self / 3 Turns)

MLB Effect: Anti-Evade [100%] (Self / 3 Turns)

Effect Definitions:

Anti-Evade is a Granted Effect that causes the unit to ignore enemy Evades. Evade is an effect that will let a unit dodge attacks. Anti-Evade stacks multiplicatively.

TLDR: This memoria is Enhancement Fodder.

Review: This memoria doesn’t suit Karin Misono’s kit very well and can be used as Enhancement Fodder, unless you are really struggling against units with evade and, for whatever reason, have Karin at four slots.

First off-- anti-evade that lasts for three turns on a four-turn cooldown for a character with passive Skill Quicken in their Spirit Enhancement basically means you have almost non-stop Anti-Evade for that one particular character. Normally this would be an amazing, excellent thing.

Here’s the problem-- it’s wasted on Karin.

Karin isn’t an attacker who is going to be your go-to for taking out pesky evaders. She’s a support-- an accele, magia-oriented support. She’s got a little bit of everything; her Spirit Enhancement active lets her take away MP from pesky attackers while also lowering their defense, making them die easier. Her magia and doppel increase her teams Accele MP Gain Up and Damage Up for three turns and further decrease the enemy’s defense for three turns as well. She has three accele discs, letting her contribute to accele combos. Her connect has a chance of inflicting Magia Seal and Dazzle-- everything thus far makes her very good as a support in dealing with enemy magical girls.

The thing about evade is that you can counter it with anti-evade, yeah, but you can also counter it with Magia/Doppels. Or status ailments, which hey! Karin can inflict that too!

Perhaps this memoria would have made Karin ideal for killing pesky magical girls when she was first released, but now it has become a relic of a bygone age. You can find Anti-Evade on tons of magical girls these days and you don’t even need to use a personal to do so-- several girls will have it for multiple turns passively just from Spirit Enhancement, and other ones can get by activating their Spirit Enhancement Active.

Overall? This is Enhancement Fodder.

[xxplastic-cubexx]

i think when cherik fuck charles just has to control himself so much that he reaches the point where he gets almost no pleasure because of the efforts and erik just doesn't see that for a long time bc charles is very good at simulating whatever it is so they fuck and erik is happy and cherles is close to tears every time because yeah he had sex but he spent all time of it struggling to remain control of his abilities and he didn't have orgasm and he just doesn't know what to do because he's afraid to tell erik and he's afraid to stop doing that because he thinks he'd project his thoughts and feeling all over the mansion and he's afraid to go on the way he does because it's exhausting and kinda awful

sorry im in the mood for angsty thoughts about charles's telepathy sorry

you jsut gon say this in fronta my salad. ..,

[a-polite-melody]

I love how you can make a post that basically boils down to “there’s a large portion of opposition to transandrophobia which is nothing but rhetorical fallacies, circular logic, and cherry picking to portray all of it as transmisogynistic when it is not and they cannot do anything besides the above strategy when asked how there is inherent transmisogyny to the theory because there isn’t anything inherently transmisogynistic going on they just want us to shut up and accept that the rhetorical fallacies, circular logic, and cherry picking actually prove inherent transmisogyny so we stop talking, else there’d be something other than these things to point at when we ask how we could fix the transmisogyny problem inherent to the discussion so we can formulate better theory on transmasculine issues”

And someone can come along and say, “yes you’re right, we do cherry pick and that should prove to you the inherent transmisogyny, because of the circular logic we use of ‘any theory under transandrophobia is transmisogynistic so anyone who then talks about that theory is inherently transmisogynistic so even if they make theory that isn’t transmisogynistic it still actually is because it was made by an inherent transmisogynist so the theory they make is inherently transmisogynistic’”

And think it’s worth having block evaded to have said that.

[reasoningdaily]

Slavery's Exiles - the story of the American Maroons

The forgotten stories of America maroons―wilderness settlers evading discovery after escaping slavery Over more than two centuries men, women, and children escaped from slavery to make the Southern wilderness their home. They hid in the mountains of Virginia and the low swamps of South Carolina; they stayed in the neighborhood or paddled their way to secluded places; they buried themselves underground or built comfortable settlements. Known as maroons, they lived on their own or set up communities in swamps or other areas where they were not likely to be discovered. Although well-known, feared, celebrated or demonized at the time, the maroons whose stories are the subject of this book have been forgotten, overlooked by academic research that has focused on the Caribbean and Latin America. Who the American maroons were, what led them to choose this way of life over alternatives, what forms of marronage they created, what their individual and collective lives were like, how they organized themselves to survive, and how their particular story fits into the larger narrative of slave resistance are questions that this book seeks to answer. To survive, the American maroons reinvented themselves, defied slave society, enforced their own definition of freedom and dared create their own alternative to what the country had delineated as being black men and women’s proper place. Audacious, self-confident, autonomous, sometimes self-sufficient, always self-governing; their very existence was a repudiation of the basic tenets of slavery.

Amazon has this book and they want a fortune for it

FEEL FREE TO DOWNLOAD IT FROM THE BLACK TRUEBRARY FOR FREE - Click HERE TO DOWNLOAD FOR FREE

[fagcrush]

Then... Tell antis to stop harassing people? You really do have this entire thing backwards (and no, sending you asks on Tumblr and playing a game isn't harassment)

Bro I literally am just sitting here I'm not responsible for every Guy on the internet and actually! Fun fact! Dont like ppl that call themselves antis for a lot of reasons!

[limerence-leftovers]

-͟͟͞☆ ✩₊˚.⋆☾⋆⁺₊✧-͟͟͞☆ ✩₊˚.⋆☾⋆⁺₊✧-͟͟͞☆ ✩₊˚.⋆☾⋆⁺₊✧-͟͟͞☆

• This is where I openly post about topics surrounding trauma, limerence, grief, politics, and more.

• Also memes. And reblogs. I like to shitpost but also not really. Satire helps me cope.

• I’m AuDHD with an official diagnosis. Which is where I’d like to take the time to say self diagnosis is welcome here. You are valid. ♡

• Disabled: Diagnosed with Fibromyalgia, POTS, and C-PTSD. I faint when I stand up too fast. 🫡

• CSA survivor.

• I block liberally and without shame. This is my corner of the internet, after all. I’ll cultivate it as I see fit.

• If you voted for Donald Trump, get the fuck off my page. I want nothing to do with you. Block me.

｡ﾟﾟ･｡･ﾟﾟ｡ ﾟ。 — Limerence Leftovers

　ﾟ･｡･ﾟ

-͟͟͞☆ ✩₊˚.⋆☾⋆⁺₊✧-͟͟͞☆ ✩₊˚.⋆☾⋆⁺₊✧-͟͟͞☆ ✩₊˚.⋆☾⋆⁺₊✧-͟͟͞☆

[nemesis-is-my-middle-name]

i was originally looking for something completely different but huh. all the way back in s1 when they originally picked up yorick('s tooth), john described it as "it doesn’t want to do anything, it has to help, and i don’t know why." inch resting.

[combustiblegarbage]

re: anon who left that ask in my assbox, 2 things

ships with a Triggering Characteristics (elr*cest and r*yed) are not welcome on my blog, are generally upsetting and i don't fuck with that

the Reason Why there's more of that in 03 fans is because of age; in the early/mid 2000s these were mainstream fandom ships. by 2010 this was waning

i tend to be live and let live with a lot of things as long as i don't have to see them and people can do their own shit privately and not throw a hissy fit when other people don't want to be involved/block them immediately but yeah for clarity. those type of ships not welcome on this blog or in the server

[charliespringverse]

rewatching house led to me infodumping at my mother about ao3 and gen z purity culture and honestly . if she didn't want these things to happen to her she shouldn't have had children with a man so incredibly neurodivergent

[taylozen]

new monster wowzers

it charges at 10x speed in random intervals, but it always crosses the same distance per-second. chaos if it were an npc

[blockcurio]

Dear fucking lord how do these people keep block evading and thinking they're in the right

I really do not give two shits about what the person did to you, stop engaging with them, when you block evade you are the shitty person in the scenario

[genericpuff]

what led me into the taxes thing to begin with tho was remembering that one scene where Hades is explaining to Persephone why he never got married, and he happens to mention Demeter-

-and knowing what we know now about Hades being a billionaire scumbag with a flower nymph fetish who has a history of targeting young and inexperienced women, now all I can think is that Hades wasn't into Demeter because she actually had her own integrity and didn't fall for any of his manipulative bullshit, but he saw it as being a "contrarian" and "argumentative".

Like fr, think of all the times guys will describe their ex-girlfriends or the women in their lives as "crazy" or "stuck up", and how that's become such a massive red flag to so many women, especially those who might be interested in a guy or on their first or second date with him. This isn't to discount the experiences of men who have been in legitimately awful relationships with terrible people, but those experiences are unfortunately often co-opted by the scumbag "alpha males" who see any amount of independence or integrity from a woman that opposes their own ego and "doesn't fit" their idealized version of what a woman "should be" as being "stuck up" and "crazy" and "argumentative". And so within the umbrella of the "not all men" debate, oftentimes women do have to be a little bit sus for their own safety and well-being when they're on a first date with a guy and he immediately starts talking about how "crazy" his ex was, because was she really? Or did he just wear her down into an unhealthier, burnt out, emotionally fatigued version of what she used to be from all the long-term manipulation and abuse?

It's funny how Rachel says this as if it's just some ironic meme when Demeter not paying taxes is canon. It was established in the original pilot episodes. You would know Demeter isn't paying taxes, Rachel, because you wrote her that way-

But... that also just begs the question of why Demeter is having to convince Zeus of all people that taxes aren't mandatory? Who are they paying taxes to? Why is Demeter saying this as if Zeus is also getting swindled out of his tax money? Why do taxes exist in Lore Olympus???

Beyond that though, the reason I even found that tweet was because it was shared on the PomegraNET website, which actually has a lot of sources on stuff Rachel has said, and that includes her apparently "not approving" of people comparing Demeter to Mother Gothel... ma'am, you literally wrote her that way-

This is the exact same as Rachel / Rachel's Discord mods (?) allegedly taking issue with people calling Apollo "Asspollo" and insulting the character for being, well, an awful person, because it was "offensive". Even though again, it bears repeating, SHE WROTE HIM THAT WAY. WHY ARE YOU TRYING TO PROTECT THE FEELINGS AND CREATIVE INTEGRITY OF THE SERIAL R*PIST CHARACTER WHO YOU WENT OUT OF YOUR WAY TO TURN INTO A SERIAL R*PIST-

[meanbossart]

I keep getting asks about it and please you just have to trust me that you don't want modern AU DU drow. You don't want sovereign citizen anti-goverment demi-anarchist non-voter du drow with his law-school dropout boyfriend helping him evade taxes. Everything you like about him as a fantasy character would get too real too quickly in a real life scenario, LOL.

[listen-to-the-inner-walrus]

hello and welcome to the uk is a fucking hell country, part 284829494

[alt text:]

Anti-monarchists receive ‘intimidatory’ Home Office letter on new protest laws

Home Office claims timing of new powers, taking effect days before king’s coronation, is coincidental

Ben Quinn, Rajeev Syal and Vikram Dodd

Official warning letters have been sent to anti-monarchists planning peaceful protests at King Charles III’s coronation saying that new criminal offences to prevent disruption have been rushed into law.

Using tactics described by lawyers as “intimidatory”, the Home Office’s Police Powers Unit wrote to the campaign group Republic saying new powers had been brought forward to prevent “disruption at major sporting and cultural events”.

The new law, given royal assent by Charles on Tuesday, means that from Wednesday:

Protesters who block roads, airports and railways could face 12 months behind bars.

Anyone locking on to others, objects or buildings could go to prison for six months and face an unlimited fine.

Police will be able to head off disruption by stopping and searching protesters if they suspect they are setting out to cause chaos.

Jun Pang, a policy and campaigns officer at Liberty, said: “Key measures in the bill will come into force just days before the coronation of King Charles – a significant event in our country’s history that is bound to inspire a wider national conversation and public protests. At the same time, the government are using a statutory instrument to bring draconian measures that the House of Lords threw out of the bill back from the dead, once again evading scrutiny and accountability.

“It’s worrying to see the police handed so many new powers to restrict protest, especially before a major national event. When the Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Act came into force, the police repeatedly misused them – in part because they simply did not understand them. Similarly, when Queen Elizabeth died, we saw police acting in inappropriate and heavy-handed ways towards protesters that violated their rights.”

Shami Chakrabarti, the former shadow attorney general, said: “During the passage of this illiberal and headline-grabbing legislation, ministers admitted that the new offence of ‘locking on’ is so broad as to catch peaceful protesters who link arms in public.

“Suspicionless stop and search is notorious for racial disparity and it is staggering that more of these provisions have brought into force so soon after Louise Casey’s devastating report [on the Met police]. The home secretary can blast ‘ecowarriors’ but this legislation may be used against anti-poverty and Ukraine solidarity protesters too.”

A statement from the home secretary, Suella Braverman, said: “This legislation is the latest step the government has taken against protesters who use highly disruptive tactics to deliberately delay members of the public, often preventing them from getting to work and hospital, as well as missing loved ones’ funerals.

“The range of new offences and penalties match the seriousness of the threat guerrilla tactics pose to our infrastructure, taxpayers’ money and police time.”

full article here

so just to sum this up, peaceful protesting can now land you in prison for a year and you might face an unlimited fine which i believe is up to £5000, and police can now stop and search you if they believe youre "setting out to cause chaos"

its specifically being put in place right before charles' coronation, but these are now considered criminal offenses so theyre not exclusive to it.

you know, a country where you can be put in prison for a year for peaceful protesting really doesnt sound like a fucking democracy to me.

[gme-news]

Ukraine We will retake Mariupol this year

via IFTTT

[thefugitivesaint]

Someone whose work I greatly appreciated and would suggest you (oh dear reader) seek out and read. In simplest terms, Scott explored the avenues in which people resisted and evaded authority and hierarchical systems of control. A good part of his scholarship involved trying to understand peasantry, one the largest "classes" in the world. Coupled to that was the study of subsistence economies and how people involved in those economies work around impositions made by State actors (and non-state actors). This led to a larger exploration of the above mentioned resistance and the various forms that this resistance took around the world. He also explored the relationship between State and non-state peoples. "What I learned is that centralised revolutionary movements have almost always resulted in a State that was more oppressive then the ones they aimed to replace. In other words, when the revolution becomes the State, it becomes my enemy again. That is why it matters greatly which methods are used in order to achieve power. .... "I am the enemy of hierarchical movements of opposition because I think they replicate State structures in their own organisation."

If you would like some suggestions that offer a peak into Scott's scholarship interests (which are similar to my own), here's some videos for you to peruse (if you have the time): 1. A Short Account of the Deep History of State Evasion 2. Beyond the Pale: The Earliest Agrarian States and “their Barbarians” 3. The Art of Not Being Governed 4. The Domestication of Fire, Animals, Grains and…….Us (Later) Edit: Some revelations concerning Scott's involvement with the CIA in the early 1960s in their anti-Communist activities has come out after his recent death that complicates his legacy as a "radical scholar". Take that for what you will. I haven't been able to find a great deal of detail about that involvement and the revelations here aren't exactly new but people have decided to highlight that relationship in the wake of Scott's passing as a way to discredit or cast a shadow over his later anti-statist research. I just wanted to note this. (Even Later) Edit: The Oral History Center at UC Berkeley released a documentary on Scott called In A Field All His Own: The Life and Career of James C. Scott. Just in case you wanted more Scott related material.