Man, I love Matpat, but his Zelda theories are just the WORST. Does he even know the lore?
Also, no, I'll never stop being angry about his Majora's Mask purgatory/dream theory. If Link died at the start of that game- when he was a KID, mind you- how do you explain the existence of Twilight Princess' Hero's Shade? In order for Link's ghost to look like that, he would've had to die as an ADULT. Otherwise, the Hero's Shade wouldn't have been a Stalfos, but a Skull Kid. You could argue that Link is internally an adult because of the whole time-screwery thing in Ocarina of Time, but that doesn't line up with the lore. You have to actually be an adult to show up as a Stalfos after dying in the Lost Woods. Besides, I'd argue that internally, Link is still just a kid. He didn't stop being a kid just because of the seven year timeskip. He just had to take on the responsibilities of an adult before he even got the chance to grow up.
Moving on. According to the Fallen Timeline, for an entire world to exist within a dream, you'd need a Windfish and a curse that makes him sleep. Majora's Mask had neither. Therefore, Termina is simply an alternate world, sort of like Lorule and the Twilight Realm. It was not a dream. End of story.
Although, I'd argue that the Twilight Realm is the space between worlds. Hyrule is light, Lorule is dark, and twilight is literally the time of day where it's not quite light and not quite dark- as in, just in between. It would make a lot of sense...
Anyways, sorry for the rant. I'm a bit ticked off at the continuous insistence on using dream theory as an explanation for everything that's weird about Majora's Mask. Dream theory is a cop-out. It was never anything else. It's just another way to dismiss making any actual theories about something this complicated.
23 notes
·
View notes
You can't tell me our main man Jim, Jim Kirk, James Kirk, James T Kirk, James Tiberius Kirk, CAPTAIN stack of books on legs James Respectful and Sensitive Tiberius Kirk does not know about Vulcan hand touching and their significance.
This man. JAMES KIRK. Looked at Spock, clearly vulcan spock, hands firmly planted behind his back Spock. LOOKED him up and down, and despite absolutely knowing it would not be considered impolite if he didnt offer a hand shake, looked at Spock, tall drink of water Spock, Vulcan sensitive hands used as terms of affection Spock, and was like hmmmm absolutely will make this Vulcan shake my hand. AND SPOCK gave like 1 second of thought before he was like yes absolutely here is my hand to hold for you and you only. I AM DECEASED
1K notes
·
View notes
I love it when women hate men. I love it when women are allowed to vent to each other about how horrible and creepy men are. I love it when women form friendships with and prioritize each other over relationships with men(whether they're attracted to them or not). I love it when women put men dni in their bios and on their nude photos and on posts on their blogs. I love it when women refuse to mollycoddle and accommodate entitled male feelings with "but this doesn't mean I hate all men, I know a few men who are great, I love my father/sons/brothers/uncles/male cousins/guy friends" I love it when women complain about men WITHOUT "not all men" being a disclaimer. I love it when women avoid socializing with/refuse to be around/befriend/get close to men because they know men can't be trusted. I love it when women make "kill all men" jokes. I love it when women offer absolutely no concern or care for men's feelings and if their misandry offends men whatsoever because why should we, men are the oppressor class who have raped and killed and abused us and kept us as subjugated as second-class citizens for millennia, they regularly mistreat us and the women in their own marginalized communities still every single day and make this world so much harder and more awful for us to be in, and if we choose to hate them and not spare them any sympathy then so be it, and I don't just mean "men as a class" either, you can be a woman who doesn't want to have anything to do with any man on an individual basis and completely cuts off men from her personal life too and ykw I will love and fucking support you in that because men deserve absolutely NOTHING from us. If they're so tough and strong then they can handle it just like they can handle being lonely. If you are a woman who hates men, ESPECIALLY IF YOU ARE A LESBIAN AND/OR A TRANS WOMAN, then just know that I love you. I love you, I support you, and you are safe here.
449 notes
·
View notes
It sucks so much that as someone with a severe and persistent mental illness it's MY responsibility to jump through hoops and be proactive in contacting people at limited times of the day just to get MY MEDS THAT I'VE BEEN TAKING CONSISTENTLY FOR YEARS
175 notes
·
View notes
It’s horrible how my design course has killed my enjoyment in creativity because all they want is finished pieces founded in nothing but a spontaneous mark just to hang at some concrete art gallery or to sell to some “join our revolution” comfy business-casual company with a prison cell wellness room. I’m not saying that it’s “not art” —cos that’s a different post altogether— it’s that the ethos behind this particular formula for art education is ruining the way we think about creation.
Design courses (and other art courses I’ve heard?) are no longer teaching artists or designers techniques, drawing skills, art fundamentals and allowing them to find their own voice so much as they are only instructing how to tic boxes alongside pushing corporate and classist motivated style/methodology bias aimed at producing workers, not creatives, not to mention providing Adobe with endless funds for their despicable scam programs. That’s it. My creativity is only a means to money for them, and if they can extract the process of creation from me without the complex creative intimacy involved in it, they know they can churn out products and services faster and it’s concerning some lecturers don’t seem to be aware this is what they’re teaching? Like they’re buying into industry propaganda?
And the whole time it’s sold to you like you can be some trailblazer when the irony is they’re usually either prepping you for cubicle work or for some misguided high horse creative team pumping out design solutions completely divorced from the reality. I’m tired of all the talks about sustainability in a vacuum with no conversation about nuanced designs that factor in broader social and economic perspectives which lack thereof is leading to sustainable products being sold at a price only able to be afforded by wealthier people who are causing said economic and social problems and contributing to the rapid obsoletion of trades and crafts. Lecturers and speakers don’t seem to think that’s any of our concern and should just worry about producing the design for the hypothetical Bluetooth powered organic hairbrush or using the twigs to make the pattern for the £85 fabric square.
Like? Can I please make something that actually resonates with people outside the circle jerk of egotistical creatives and corporations? Something charming and maybe idk something that doesn’t make me want to tear my miserable portfolio in half with my teeth? And they’re like Mm nope sorry it has to be an extreme close up of a mark making abstract leaf you made from a recycled trash bag inspired by a stalled urban space which we will force you to price at £100 during your exhibition 5 people will bother to attend and no you’re not allowed any other style cos this isn’t the Dark Ages :///
I think the worst thing my lecturer ever said was, while looking around the room of our class work reduced down to a series of cubes and splatters and abstract typography, “Wow, I love how you can’t tell what anyone’s [main artist discipline] is!” Like awww conformity at the expense of a person’s individuality to make pieces for airport hallways and rich people’s living rooms wow so cool heehee like girl that’s not good?? Why on Earth are you complimenting us for that? Like I get it, I thought this course would boost skillset as an illustrator (as we were told), turns out the degree is really not for me, fair enough to anyone thinking that, but forcing students to produce modern abstract art because you think it’s the ONLY Logical Pathway for the future of design, judging them intensely for doing a different style, and thinking producing financially inaccessible art + design is the solution to things like climate change and community severance is an objectively bad take.
145 notes
·
View notes
You know: fuck this show! Fuck Viviziepop and her gaslighting victim blaming bullshit!
I don't care if you like Blitzo or not, he was forced into having sex with Stolas and even as the owl fuck 'apologizes' he still makes himself the victim! If he loved him he'd just give him the crystal without guilt tripping the guy or end the deal and let him use the book with no strings attached but no it's only about how much Stolas is the victim. We don't see things from Blitzo's perspective only this delusional asshole who only thought they were childhood friends when Blitzo was FORCED to be his playmate for a day.
Also I hate how Viv writes her characters like Ozzie and Fizz ooc just so Stolas can look better I'm sorry Ozzie would have saved Fizz himself and tell Stolas to go fuck himself and honestly I think they would give the crystal straight to Blitzo suppose to Stolas. Ozzie gave a speech about consent to Stolas he's gonna pick up on some red flags.
And yes I am still mad about how Ozzie was treated in this season thanks for asking...
I hate this, I hate what this show became it just fucking hurts to see something that I once loved turn into this Stolas pity party. I hate that this makes me as angry as it is but holy shit I never seen a show take such a nose dive as this and gaslight the audience in thinking that this is good writing just...
182 notes
·
View notes
I need him like I need air.
123 notes
·
View notes
You don't get it, do you?
If you say that Izzy's death was a beautiful conclusion to his arc, that it was kind. You just. You don't fucking get it.
You don't get to say shit like that if you're able-bodied, and then ignore those of us who are disabled, and who liked Izzy, and are now angry and saddened by his death.
Do you think it was, I don't know... A humane way of ending things?
Well. If that's the case then, first of all, I don't want you anywhere near me. Second of all, I want you to sit with yourself and think, but like really think, about why you think it's more humane to kill off a physically disabled queer character rather than, I don't know, let him live out the rest of his life happily, getting more and more accustomed to his disability, overcoming his trauma and enjoying his life to the fullest.
Queerness and disability rarely intersect in media, unlike real life. For a few episodes, Izzy's arc gave so many of us hope. It was a beautiful, dazzling story of a man who's been through unimaginable horrors, who was only just starting to overcome his trauma, finding love, acceptance and community.
Do you know how rare it is to witness a story like that? To see yourself in a character, in a way that you've never felt seen by media before?
Now, can you imagine how much of a slap in the face it was when he died? And a death that, I might add, wasn't necessary for anyone's development, was anticlimactic, cruel, and, perhaps the most importantly, came way too early?
So, you don't get to tell us that we're overreacting after Izzy was killed off. You don't get to do that, because you just don't get it. We're hurting, and for a good reason. Because it's vile, and because if we don't speak up against it, nobody else will do it for us. You can sit in your own little corner, telling yourself that the season finale was good and satisfying, and that you're happy with the way it ended if it's indeed the series finale.
Meanwhile I'll stay here, thinking about how a beloved, queer, disabled character on a beloved queer show was put down with a gun like a horse with a broken leg.
But that was the kind thing to do, wasn't it?
324 notes
·
View notes
Maybe I'll make a post on this at some point but like, something deeply fucked up about TNP and Po3 that people have totally forgotten about is how badly they try to whine that "Tigerstar Had Good Traits :("
Firestar does it, Brambleclaw does it, and they keep doing this after it becomes this GRAND irony that Firestar almost gets Tiger'd to death in a fox trap because he was too trusting. Bramble gets his pity award of keeping deputyship and then cries to his son about how No One Saw The Good In Tigerstar :(
And it's wiiiiild that no one else in this fandom has done anything with the fact that Leopardstar broke the Warrior Code to appoint Hawkfrost, who had no apprentice, an extremely aggressive and warmongering Tigerclone who says things like "Tigerstar wasn't the worst cat to look up to." ONLY qualifying trait was being kinda like Tigerstar.
And she practically did that the SECOND Mistyfoot went missing. And then Leopardstar continued to be one of the most violent and xenophobic leaders through Po3, joining with WindClan to attack ThunderClan.
What I'm getting at is that like, a few years ago, with books like "Blackfoot's Reckoning" and "Shadow in RiverClan" it's like they suddenly decided to retcon in a bunch of "redemption arcs" in hindsight. They just pretended like there was this grand high reckoning with TigerClan, when there literally wasn't, and if anything that caused SERIOUS problems for the cast that the authors didn't fully acknowledge as such.
And now ppl haven't actually read the main series and are just working with their recent memory of all these retcon books.
But TNP and PO3 are still there, and you can go and see the ACTUAL timeline where Leopardstar is really not apologetic at all, and Blackstar is a useful stooge for the very next wannabe dictator that strolls in, in spite of the new side content that COMPLETELY mischaracterized them for their plots to work.
196 notes
·
View notes
Rise episode where the Purple Dragons start making and selling ““““art”“““ using Artificial Generators (”It’s not AI, Angelo, it is not remotely intelligent and the only things it learns is what is fed to it’s algorithm. The next person who calls it AI in front of me again is going to be used as a test subject for the Tank’s laser upgrades.”)
Donnie and Mikey team up to stop them because what better way to destroy Artificially Generated garbage than with the Smarts and Crafts duo.
While Donnie sabotages and destroys all the Purple Dragons’ tech, Mikey ties them up and gives them a lecture on art. It lasts for several hours. The Dragons are begging to be turned over to the police before he’s finished.
545 notes
·
View notes
i just wanted to say i love hearing you and your friends analysis on dsmp and its so refreshing to see ppl understand the abuse in the story and to see ppl engaging with the story critically. Back then i definitely tried to act “ok” with the cwilbur ending and everything that transpired before and after that but it all ultimately left me with such a bad taste in my mouth that I couldn’t stand to watch anythinf else about the dsmp after. your art has made me revisit and appreciate the few good and interesting things about the story, Keep up the amazing work!:)
thank u so much 💞💞💞… honestly this is the first time in a while where I’ve posted abt analysis and not been terrified or paranoid over shitty ppl coming to either debate me, (excuse abuse or undermine my analysis and claim rly weird shit) or just tell me none of it actually matters. It does matter !! We neeeeeed to be more critical, especially when it comes to media made by abusers, past present and future. In many ways I wish to be someone who uplifts and makes a safe space for victims and those who support us .. I will continue to do so with my analyses and my art.
105 notes
·
View notes
jack and janet drake were honestly so revolutionary for creating an only child that was a middle child from birth
784 notes
·
View notes
This is why you don’t trust me with researching things 👍
Sorry for putting those lilacs and poppi- *GUN SHOTS* -Some sort of ripoff unintelligible accent- “They been in the desert for long enough”
I don’t know why I added that last bit 💀
71 notes
·
View notes
reincarnation au where the three people you fell in love with in three separate lifetimes reincarnate back into the present, but the problem is......there is only one you......and they're the only ones who remember......(extra messy points: they become famous solely for the reason that you'd be able to find them again easily but boohoo! you don't fucking remember them!!!)
187 notes
·
View notes