#in the food industry
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
thingsorganizedneatly · 9 months ago
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media
Did you know that there is a Toaster Museum????
7K notes · View notes
reasonsforhope · 8 months ago
Text
Federal regulators on Tuesday [April 23, 2024] enacted a nationwide ban on new noncompete agreements, which keep millions of Americans — from minimum-wage earners to CEOs — from switching jobs within their industries.
The Federal Trade Commission on Tuesday afternoon voted 3-to-2 to approve the new rule, which will ban noncompetes for all workers when the regulations take effect in 120 days [So, the ban starts in early September, 2024!]. For senior executives, existing noncompetes can remain in force. For all other employees, existing noncompetes are not enforceable.
[That's right: if you're currently under a noncompete agreement, it's completely invalid as of September 2024! You're free!!]
The antitrust and consumer protection agency heard from thousands of people who said they had been harmed by noncompetes, illustrating how the agreements are "robbing people of their economic liberty," FTC Chair Lina Khan said. 
The FTC commissioners voted along party lines, with its two Republicans arguing the agency lacked the jurisdiction to enact the rule and that such moves should be made in Congress...
Why it matters
The new rule could impact tens of millions of workers, said Heidi Shierholz, a labor economist and president of the Economic Policy Institute, a left-leaning think tank. 
"For nonunion workers, the only leverage they have is their ability to quit their job," Shierholz told CBS MoneyWatch. "Noncompetes don't just stop you from taking a job — they stop you from starting your own business."
Since proposing the new rule, the FTC has received more than 26,000 public comments on the regulations. The final rule adopted "would generally prevent most employers from using noncompete clauses," the FTC said in a statement.
The agency's action comes more than two years after President Biden directed the agency to "curtail the unfair use" of noncompetes, under which employees effectively sign away future work opportunities in their industry as a condition of keeping their current job. The president's executive order urged the FTC to target such labor restrictions and others that improperly constrain employees from seeking work.
"The freedom to change jobs is core to economic liberty and to a competitive, thriving economy," Khan said in a statement making the case for axing noncompetes. "Noncompetes block workers from freely switching jobs, depriving them of higher wages and better working conditions, and depriving businesses of a talent pool that they need to build and expand."
Real-life consequences
In laying out its rationale for banishing noncompetes from the labor landscape, the FTC offered real-life examples of how the agreements can hurt workers.
In one case, a single father earned about $11 an hour as a security guard for a Florida firm, but resigned a few weeks after taking the job when his child care fell through. Months later, he took a job as a security guard at a bank, making nearly $15 an hour. But the bank terminated his employment after receiving a letter from the man's prior employer stating he had signed a two-year noncompete.
In another example, a factory manager at a textile company saw his paycheck dry up after the 2008 financial crisis. A rival textile company offered him a better job and a big raise, but his noncompete blocked him from taking it, according to the FTC. A subsequent legal battle took three years, wiping out his savings. 
-via CBS Moneywatch, April 24, 2024
--
Note:
A lot of people think that noncompete agreements are only a white-collar issue, but they absolutely affect blue-collar workers too, as you can see from the security guard anecdote.
In fact, one in six food and service workers are bound by noncompete agreements. That's right - one in six food workers can't leave Burger King to work for Wendy's [hypothetical example], in the name of "trade secrets." (x, x, x)
Noncompete agreements also restrict workers in industries from tech and video games to neighborhood yoga studios. "The White House estimates that tens of millions of workers are subject to noncompete agreements, even in states like California where they're banned." (x, x, x)
The FTC estimates that the ban will lead to "the creation of 8,500 new businesses annually, an average annual pay increase of $524 for workers, lower health care costs, and as many as 29,000 more patents each year for the next decade." (x)
Clearer explanation of noncompete agreements below the cut.
Noncompete agreements can restrict workers from leaving for a better job or starting their own business.
Noncompetes often effectively coerce workers into staying in jobs they want to leave, and even force them to leave a profession or relocate.
Noncompetes can prevent workers from accepting higher-paying jobs, and even curtail the pay of workers not subject to them directly.
Of the more than 26,000 comments received by the FTC, more than 25,000 supported banning noncompetes. 
3K notes · View notes
probablyasocialecologist · 2 months ago
Text
The global food economy is massively inefficient. The need for standardized products means tons of edible food are destroyed or left to rot. This is one reason more than one-third of the global food supply is wasted or lost; for the U.S., the figure is closer to one-half. The logic of global trade results in massive quantities of identical products being simultaneously imported and exported—a needless waste of fossil fuels and an enormous addition to greenhouse gas emissions. In a typical year, for example, the U.S. imports more than 400,000 tons of potatoes and 1 million tons of beef while exporting almost the same tonnage. The same is true of many other food commodities and countries. The same logic leads to shipping foods worldwide simply to reduce labor costs for processing. Shrimp harvested off the coast of Scotland, for example, are shipped 6,000 miles to Thailand to be peeled, then shipped 6,000 miles back to the UK to be sold to consumers. The supposed efficiency of monocultural production is based on output per unit of labor, which is maximized by replacing jobs with chemical- and energy-intensive technology. Measured by output per acre, however—a far more relevant metric—smaller-scale farms are typically 8 to 20 times more productive.
5 November 2024
930 notes · View notes
chamerionwrites · 11 days ago
Text
Nearly a dozen children were working shifts cleaning meat processing equipment used at an Iowa pork plant’s so-called kill floor over a four-year period, the US Department of Labor announced.
Eleven children were using corrosive chemicals to clean as well as perilous “head splitters, jaw pullers, bandsaws, neck clippers and other equipment” at a Seaboard Triumph Foods pork processing plant in Sioux City, according to officials. This is the second time federal investigators have found children working at that particular Sioux City meat processing plant.
The most recent settlement comes with Qvest LLC, an Oklahoma-based cleaning company hired by Seaboard from 2019 to 2023. The company was fined $171,919 for violating federal law.
In September 2023, Seaboard hired a new cleaning contractor: Fayette Janitorial Services, headquartered in Tennessee. Investigators found Fayette hired 24 children to work overnight shifts – some as young as 13 and carrying glittery school backpacks – including some of the same minors who were employed by Qvest, the previous cleaning company. In May, Fayette was fined $649,304.
“These findings illustrate Seaboard Triumph Foods’ history of children working illegally in their Sioux City facility since at least September 2019,” said wage and hour midwest regional administrator Michael Lazzeri. “Despite changing sanitation contractors, children continued to work in dangerous occupations at this facility.”
The federal investigation comes after a 2023 New York Times report on migrant child exploitation, in which the paper documented children working dangerous jobs and overnight hours.
Children who arrive at the US’s southern border alone often stay in the country for years before their cases are adjudicated. While they wait, they live with sponsors. As of 2023, only one-third of migrant children went to live with their parents, a sea change from a decade ago. That can leave children vulnerable to exploitation or trafficking.
760 notes · View notes
reality-detective · 6 days ago
Text
An American cattle rancher exposing why the beef sold in american grocery stores doesn’t look like natural beef.
The gasses pumped into American grocery store meat are a mixture of carbon dioxide, oxygen, and carbon monoxide. Carbon monoxide binds with myoglobin in the meat, which keeps the meat looking bright red for weeks.
Other countries have banned using carbon monoxide on meat. 🤔
243 notes · View notes
gottastim · 4 months ago
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media
criminisiicecream on ig
281 notes · View notes
baaad-omens · 8 months ago
Text
doing some research on parapsychology as a field. in short, it's the study of how the supernatural relates to psychology, and is largely regarded as pseudoscience with only a handful of people studying it, and very very few universities will even offer a parapsych program.
so… martin, buddy, did you just google 'what degrees do people get for paranormal research' and go with the first one that popped up? you did didn't you. idiot.
346 notes · View notes
itsapmseymour · 6 months ago
Text
So I remember reading that post that called Omelettes, fancy egg tacos,
Which I get, but considering most of the omelettes I have had are rolled up…
Call that
Call that
An Egg Roll
319 notes · View notes
dosesofcommonsense · 1 month ago
Text
Tumblr media
A cured patient is money lost
92 notes · View notes
memphisfoodnotbombs · 1 year ago
Text
Tumblr media
“They got money for war, but can’t feed the poor. - Tupac Shakur”
“No US Military aid to Israel”
Anti-war sticker spotted in Albany, New York
Via @radicalgraff
#Palestine #FreePalestine #Israel #MilitaryIndustrialComplex #2Pac #TupacShakur #NoWarButClassWar #Poverty #FeedThePoor #FoodIsAHumanRight #FoodNotBombs #CeaseFire #CeasefireNow #FoodNotBombsMemphis #MemphisFoodNotBombs #Graffiti #RadicalGraffiti #Leftist #Leftists #humanitarianism #ProPeace #AntiWar #AbolishWar #EndAllWars #JewishVoicesForPeace
520 notes · View notes
arrimorr · 30 days ago
Text
Finished relistening to S2 of Archive 81 and the concept of podcast creators giving their main characters their own names is actually so fascinating to me. I mean, in what headspace do you need to be to create a guy who shares your name and voice, and then have him suffer being cut open and merged with a tape recorder. Then you proceed and give this guy who shares your name and voice an mpreg arc. This guy has a shared child with a living eldritch museum that cannot be now. I just don't think everyone would do something like that you know???
94 notes · View notes
lilithism1848 · 11 months ago
Text
Tumblr media
252 notes · View notes
probablyasocialecologist · 1 year ago
Text
A key issue in understanding who feeds the world is the distinction between calories produced and calories delivered. Simply because a farming method produces a lot of calories, does not mean that those calories are going towards feeding people. Calories can be wasted or channeled into animal feed, biofuels, and other non-food uses, complicating how we assess methods for alleviating hunger. Emily Cassidy and her team studied this phenomenon across major agricultural countries. They found that in India, for example, 89% of produced crop calories went to feeding people during the study period. In Brazil, however, that number was 45%. In the United States, which produces the most gross calories out of any country studied, it was only 27%.
Backgrounder: Small Scale Farmers and Peasants Still Feed the World
658 notes · View notes
unbfacts · 2 months ago
Text
Tumblr media
The U.S. holds about 1.4 billion pounds of cheese, primarily owned by private companies and stored in facilities like Missouri's underground warehouses.
84 notes · View notes
reality-detective · 23 days ago
Text
American Government data tracks men and women obesity rates of all different ages, on the graph “What you see is between 1960-1975, there's a fairly steady percentage of obesity in the population. But in the mid 1970s obesity starts going up in all of the groups simultaneously.
Now, if you're saying willpower is responsible, what you're proposing is that all of these groups of people simultaneously lost moral responsibility and that's not plausible.
Something else happened to our food in the mid 19 seventies to make it irresistible to people.”
And it got worse as time progressed 🤔
209 notes · View notes
incognitopolls · 9 months ago
Text
We ask your questions so you don’t have to! Submit your questions to have them posted anonymously as polls.
213 notes · View notes