#chain immigration

[pinoypesilat]

[odinsblog]

Republicans excel at the, “Rules for thee, but not for me” form of governance.

[hussyknee]

Whenever Brits are like "tea is our national drink, our culture, our personality, our mental health" I think of our hill country blanketed in a patchwork quilt of human suffering and ongoing violent colonialism and want to smash all their tea cups. Your genocidal leaf juice is nothing to be proud of. The present day tea pluckers are the descendants of the Indians you enslaved and they still live in unthinkable poverty in the line houses you built to house them like cattle. The families whose farmlands you robbed have been starving for generations. Every sip of your leaf juice is soaked in blood and you drink it like vampires.

Tea will never belong to you. It's our legacy of grief, and your shame.

Drink your tea and shut the fuck up.

[shinobicyrus]

It doesn't matter to JD Vance - or Trump's supporters - that the 'immigrants eating pets' stories are false. He's admitted as much, and says he will keep repeating them. Because "memes."

It also doesn't matter when it's pointed out to him that the Haitian immigrants in Springfield, Ohio are in the country legally. He's going to keep calling them "illegal" because their legal status is not the thing about them that he finds objectionable.

It doesn't matter if they're legal immigrants or illegal immigrants. It doesn't matter that immigrants - regardless of legal status - are statistically much less likely to commit crimes than those born in the United States.

None of those things matter, because it's never been about those things.

Trump & JD Vance and all of their supporters hate immigrants. Full stop. The reasons and justifications will always shift and change to fit the present circumstances and political environment; reactionary politics at its finest. Meanwhile, the cold and vile core remains unchanged:

"These non-white people are lesser than us. In fact, they aren't people and we don't want them here."

[vertigoartgore]

Superman by the great comic book artist José Luis García-López.

[futurebird]

"Chain migration" is the BEST kind of immigration.

You want people who move to you country to have a local network and support. You want new immigrants to bring their family, and the economic activity they generate and the value they add to communities to be in YOUR country.

I can't believe we let them use it like a slur. It's good and do it more.

What? They brought their elderly parents? That's good for US and for them (the new American we want to be successful and happy.) RIGHT?

[thesundanceghost]

That post that starts about texmex cuisine and then the reblogs are all about immigrant food and the myth of American bastardization just bugs me because yes all the replies are accurate but nobody on that post has the insight to realize that those points literally don’t apply to texmex cuisine because the op’s entire point is that the original tejanos were not immigrants and it was the border that moved. Not them.

[dreaminginthedeepsouth]

This political cartoon by Louis Dalrymple appeared in Judge magazine in 1903. It depicts European immigrants as rats. Nativism and anti-immigration have a long and sordid history in the United States.

* * * *

LETTERS FROM AN AMERICAN

March 28, 2024

HEATHER COX RICHARDSON

MAR 29, 2024

Yesterday the National Economic Council called a meeting of the Supply Chain Disruptions Task Force, which the Biden-Harris administration launched in 2021, to discuss the impact of the collapse of the Francis Scott Key Bridge and the partial closure of the Port of Baltimore on regional and national supply chains. The task force draws members from the White House and the departments of Transportation, Commerce, Agriculture, Defense, Labor, Health and Human Services, Energy, and Homeland Security. It is focused on coordinating efforts to divert ships to other ports and to minimize impacts to employers and workers, making sure, for example, that dock workers stay on payrolls. 

Today, Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg convened a meeting of port, labor, and industry partners—ocean carriers, truckers, local business owners, unions, railroads, and so on—to mitigate disruption from the bridge collapse. Representatives came from 40 organizations including American Roll-on Roll-off Carrier; the Georgia Ports Authority; the International Longshoremen’s Association, the International Organization of Masters, Mates and Pilots; John Deere; Maersk; Mercedes-Benz North America Operations; Seabulk Tankers; Under Armour; and the World Shipping Council.  

Today the U.S. Department of Transportation’s Federal Highway Administration announced it would make $60 million available immediately to be used as a down payment toward initial costs. Already, though, some Republicans are balking at the idea of using new federal money to rebuild the bridge, saying that lawmakers should simply take the money that has been appropriated for things like electric vehicles, or wait until insurance money comes in from the shipping companies. 

In 2007, when a bridge across the Mississippi River in Minneapolis suddenly collapsed, Congress passed funding to rebuild it in days and then-president George W. Bush signed the measure into law within a week of the accident. 

In the past days, we have learned that the six maintenance workers killed when the bridge collapsed were all immigrants, natives of Mexico, Honduras, Guatemala, and El Salvador. Around 39% of the workforce in the construction industry around Baltimore and Washington, D.C., about 130,000 people, are immigrants, Scott Dance and María Luisa Paúl reported in the Washington Post yesterday. 

Some of the men were undocumented, and all of them were family men who sent money back to their home countries, as well. From Honduras, the nephew of one of the men killed told the Associated Press, “The kind of work he did is what people born in the U.S. won’t do. People like him travel there with a dream. They don’t want to break anything or take anything.”  

In the Philadelphia Inquirer today, journalist Will Bunch castigated the right-wing lawmakers and pundits who have whipped up native-born Americans over immigration, calling immigrants sex traffickers and fentanyl dealers, and even “animals.” Bunch illustrated that the reality of what was happening on the Francis Scott Key Bridge when it collapsed creates an opportunity to reframe the immigration debate in the United States.

Last month, Catherine Rampell of the Washington Post noted that immigration is a key reason that the United States experienced greater economic growth than any other nation in the wake of the coronavirus pandemic. The surge of immigration that began in 2022 brought to the U.S. working-age people who, Director Phill Swagel of the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office wrote, are expected to make the U.S. gross domestic product about $7 trillion larger over the ten years from 2023 to 2034 than it would have been otherwise. Those workers will account for about $1 trillion dollars in revenues. 

Curiously, while Republican leaders today are working to outdo each other in their harsh opposition to immigration, it was actually the leaders of the original Republican Party who recognized the power of immigrants to build the country and articulated an economic justification for increased immigration during the nation’s first major anti-immigrant period. 

The United States had always been a nation of immigrants, but in the 1840s the failure of the potato crop in Ireland sent at least half a million Irish immigrants to the United States. As they moved into urban ports on the East Coast, especially in Massachusetts and New York, native-born Americans turned against them as competitors for jobs.

The 1850s saw a similar anti-immigrant fury in the new state of California. After the discovery of gold there in 1848, native-born Americans—the so-called Forty Niners—moved to the West Coast. They had no intention of sharing the riches they expected to find. The Indigenous people who lived there had no right to the land under which gold lay, native-born men thought; nor did the Mexicans whose government had sold the land to the U.S. in 1848; nor did the Chileans, who came with mining skills that made them powerful competitors. Above all, native-born Americans resented the Chinese miners who came to work in order to send money home to a land devastated by the first Opium War.

Democrats and the new anti-immigrant American Party (more popularly known as the “Know Nothings” because members claimed to know nothing about the party) turned against the new immigrants, seeing them as competition that would drive down wages. In the 1850s, Know Nothing officials in Massachusetts persecuted Catholics and deported Irish immigrants they believed were paupers. In California the state legislature placed a monthly tax on Mexican and Chinese miners, made unemployment a crime, took from Chinese men the right to testify in court, and finally tried to stop Chinese immigration altogether by taxing shipmasters $50 for each Chinese immigrant they brought.   

When the Republicans organized in the 1850s, they saw society differently than the Democrats and the Know Nothings. They argued that society was not made up of a struggle over a limited economic pie, but rather that hardworking individuals would create more than they could consume, thus producing capital that would make the economy grow. The more people a nation had, the stronger it would be.

In 1860 the new party took a stand against the new laws that discriminated against immigrants. Immigrants’ rights should not be “abridged or impaired,” the delegates to its convention declared, adding that they were “in favor of giving a full and efficient protection to the rights of all classes of citizens, whether native or naturalized, both at home and abroad.”

Republicans’ support for immigration only increased during the Civil War. In contrast to the southern enslavers, they wanted to fill the land with people who supported freedom. As one poorly educated man wrote to his senator, “Protect Emegration and that will protect the Territories to Freedom.”

Republicans also wanted to bring as many workers to the country as possible to increase economic development. The war created a huge demand for agricultural products to feed the troops. At the same time, a terrible drought in Europe meant there was money to be made exporting grain. But the war was draining men to the battlefields of Stones River and Gettysburg and to the growing U.S. Navy, leaving farmers with fewer and fewer hands to work the land. 

By 1864, Republicans were so strongly in favor of immigration that Congress passed “an Act to Encourage Immigration.” The law permitted immigrants to borrow against future homesteads to fund their voyage to the U.S., appropriated money to provide for impoverished immigrants upon their arrival, and, to undercut Democrats’ accusations that they were simply trying to find men to throw into the grinding war, guaranteed that no immigrant could be drafted until he announced his intention of becoming a citizen. 

Support for immigration has waxed and waned repeatedly since then, but as recently as 1989, Republican president Ronald Reagan said: “We lead the world because, unique among nations, we draw our people—our strength—from every country and every corner of the world. And by doing so we continuously renew and enrich our nation…. Thanks to each wave of new arrivals to this land of opportunity, we're a nation forever young, forever bursting with energy and new ideas, and always on the cutting edge, always leading the world to the next frontier. This quality is vital to our future as a nation. If we ever closed the door to new Americans, our leadership in the world would soon be lost.”

The workers who died in the bridge collapse on Tuesday “were not ‘poisoning the blood of our country,’” Will Bunch wrote, quoting Trump; “they were replenishing it…. They may have been born all over the continent, but when these men plunged into our waters on Tuesday, they died as Americans.”

LETTERS FROM AN AMERICAN

HEATHER COX RICHARDSON

[didnt-hear-cold-as-you-live]

Everyone’s like “I could never move to Australia because I could never leave my loved ones behind!!!!!!” Well why don’t you just. Convince your loved ones to move to Australia as I am trying to do with you

[thingsofimportanceanddelight]

Do y'all know the joke that how you pronounce it depends on whether or not it's been eaten already? Because before you eat it, it's s-cone, and then after you've eaten it, it's s-gone.

let's settle this

rb + say in tags where you're from if you'd like

[douchebagbrainwaves]

THE COURAGE OF PLACE

These quotes about luck are not from founders whose startups failed. The investors would not infrequently collude to push down the valuation. They assume ideas are like miracles: they either pop into your head or they don't. Microsoft would crush them. Imagine if, instead, you treated immigration like recruiting—if you made an open-source operating system? I said before, a large random factor in the mathematical sense; see equation above in readability. That's why I write them. America plus tragedy equals the Civil War were. The empirical answer is: no. Actually the best model would be to say that.

Some we helped with technical advice—for whatever people want. If you plan to get rich can do it by feeding the cat, going out to buy something they need for their apartment, meeting a friend for coffee, checking email. This focus on the user. But this can't be an intrinsically European quality; previous generations of Europeans were as ambitious as Americans. 7% of a much larger number. Indeed, one quality all the founders shared this summer was a spirit of independence. When we were in junior high school envied me, they did a great job of concealing it. And indeed, that might be a good idea is therefore a million dollar idea. At a good college you're concentrated together with a lot of ways to get rich by counterfeiting, talking about making money? No matter how much you're getting done. We felt pretty lame at the time. Co-founders really should be people you already know.

Perhaps high schools should drop English and just teach writing. But every institution was at one point they were a just a couple guys in Albuquerque writing Basic interpreters for a market of a few smart friends. That principle, like the Soviet Union, and to a lesser extent Britain under the labor governments of the 1960s and early 1970s. The good news is, the highs are also very high. Perhaps the reason more startups per capita happen in the future had few fonts and they weren't antialiased. At this early stage, the product needs to evolve more than to be built out, and that's usually easier with fewer people. If this is a recipe for deadlock, and partly because it tends to create deadlock, and delay is the thing a startup can least afford. A friend of mine started a company in Germany in the early 90s, and was shocked to discover, not something you can do more than anyone expected.

It seems obvious when you put it that way. What if you built a peer-to-peer dating site? The ones on startups get tested by about 70 people every 6 months. In theory it seemed that the conclusion of a really good job, is a language that makes source code ugly is maddening to an exacting programmer, as clay full of lumps would be to say that angel rounds will increasingly take the place of investor-controlled rounds are taking the place of series A rounds, but in other fields where they have a natural monopoly, like nuclear waste dumps, aircraft carriers, and regime change, you'd find plenty of projects isomorphic to this one—and indeed, plenty that were less successful. John McArtyem. Having strings in a language seems to be a situation with measurement and leverage. It certainly is possible for individual programs to be written as thin enough skins that users can see the same program written in two languages, and one that most people never seem to make, but are definitely launched as companies. The only catch is that people were doing it before, just haphazardly on a smaller scale. I'm glad I phrased that as a kid you're sitting on the shoulders of someone else who's treading water, and that you have so many choices.

That's kind of hard to imagine. I think, is that it has such a core is one of the most surprising things I discovered during my brief business career was the existence of the PR Society of America gets to the heart of the matter: Bloggers are sensitive about becoming mouthpieces for other organizations and companies, which is the number of elements, where an element is anything that would be trivially easy to implement. As E. We had a chance to do this well. The fact that it has such a core is one of Lisp's distinguishing features, and the people who need them. What you want to go faster, it's a problem to explain: why are unions shrinking now? Hiring too fast is by far the greatest liability of not having gone to the college you'd have liked is your own ad copy. We had the opportunity to raise a lot more, than they would if that were their only motivation.

The true test of a language to see if there are any laws regulating businesses, you can manufacture them by taking any project usually done by multiple people and trying to do in an essay about it. They're the ones in a position of independence, they develop the qualities they need. Once they realized this, they may simply violate it and invite you to sue them. Getting rich means you can stop judging them and yourself by superficial measures, but that they can do it by changing the world. When she turned to see what had happened, she found the steps were all different heights. Another reason people don't work on big things, or split the moral load with collaborators. Immigration policy is one area where a competitor could do better. They're not what you might think. We were supposed to do for the next couple years, a good idea in the first six months is that it can be wrong, so long as, in the very word thesis. In general, to make great things. The ideas start to get mixed together with the study of ancient texts had such prestige that it does everything with lists. You don't see all the false starts.

[edwardseymour]

hi! i'm a south asian person in the uk. i'm not muslim or sikh, but it always makes me happy when people speak out about the shit that is going on.

i hope these fucking wastes of oxygen are given what they deserve. it's so disgusting that things like this still happen. i'm not scared for myself, i live in a liberal area, but i am so afraid for my fellow poc in this shithole.

i know this isn't the place for this rant, but i also wanted to say i love your blog. thank you for it <3

have a lovely day

i am so very sorry for how terrible this country is. i sincerely hope you, your family, and loved ones are well.

it is so important for white (and cis) people to show up in a meaningful way, every time. it is a privilege and it is a responsibility. the only way through is together, we absolutely have a duty to not let anyone get left behind.

[erebusvincent]

We absolutely need to end birthright citizenship for the children of legal and illegal aliens, but it has to be by constitutional amendment. It irks me to no end that we still haven’t dealt with this problem, but an executive order would die in court in less than an hour.

[odinsblog]

Speaking of hypocrisy and chain migration and “anchor” babies …

Of course, no human being is “illegal,” and no one should speak disparagingly about our fellow human beings who are desperate enough to walk hundreds and hundreds of miles just to seek a better life in another country, and who faced only goodness knows what to get here

BUT …!! if we were going to start calling people names, then Trump is thee textbook definition of American “chains” who purchase their brides online marry immigrants and create “anchor” babies

Something something, glass houses, something something, throw stones ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Where's that one come comic that's like a guy being interviewed and he says "I didn't say put all immigrants in a meat grinder" or whatever

Because this is literally exactly that.