#Imaginative Realm

[kaberriveraltar]

The Harmony of Realms: Understanding Consciousness through Language, Imagination, and Behavior

The discussion with Tor Nørretranders, a Danish author known for his work on consciousness, delves into the nature of consciousness, sensory perception, and how humans process information. Nørretranders' book The User Illusion is a foundational text in this field, exploring consciousness as a reduction function, a concept that resonates with Aldous Huxley's idea of the "reducing valve" of consciousness.

The conversation begins by addressing modern civilization's obsession with predictability and control, which, Nørretranders argues, leads to a dulled and overly simplistic way of interacting with the world. He advocates for a "refresh" of sensory inputs to awaken a more nuanced and engaged state of mind, suggesting that our minds naturally crave a balance between order and novelty.

Jordan Peterson, the host, shares his understanding of consciousness as a multi-tiered phenomenon, structured from material reality up through behavioral, imaginative, and linguistic realms. Nørretranders aligns with this, adding that human sensory systems absorb around 11 million bits of information per second, yet our conscious awareness processes only about 16 bits per second. This enormous gap suggests that much of what we experience is filtered out, and consciousness serves as a simplified interface with reality.

Peterson's framework suggests that each layer builds upon the last: the material realm of patterns supports behavioral expressions, which are then represented in the imaginative realm (such as dreams or literature), and finally mapped in the linguistic realm. Nørretranders appreciates this layered approach but emphasizes starting with the basic observation of sensory input and our brain's selective filtering process.

Throughout the conversation, they explore how language unpacks compressed ideas and how understanding is built through a harmony of these different realms. The dialogue provides a rich philosophical and scientific look at consciousness, encouraging reflection on how much of reality is accessible to us and how much remains beyond the scope of conscious perception.

Understanding Consciousness: Patterns, Perception, and the Limits of Awareness

In our modern age, we tend to view consciousness as an advanced and distinctively human phenomenon. We value our awareness, our capacity for language, and our imaginative abilities, all of which seem to separate us from other species. Yet, Danish author and philosopher Tor Nørretranders, in his work, particularly his influential book The User Illusion, challenges us to rethink our understanding of consciousness by emphasizing its limitations and functions as a “reducing” mechanism. Nørretranders argues that the human brain does not perceive reality in its fullness but compresses and simplifies vast amounts of sensory information to create a coherent and manageable experience. This essay explores the themes presented by Nørretranders and others on consciousness as a layered phenomenon, touching upon the material, behavioral, imaginative, and linguistic realms, and investigates how consciousness serves as a simplifying force rather than an all-encompassing awareness.

The Material and Behavioral Realms

Consciousness begins in what Nørretranders describes as a world of patterns—a "material realm" where objects and processes persist in intricate, interconnected forms. Here, patterns of varying scales and durations create a stable environment that humans and animals navigate daily. From the rhythms of nature to the structure of objects around us, the material world holds a vast amount of information that is essential for survival but beyond the full grasp of any one creature.

In addition to this material realm, living beings also exist within a "behavioral realm," where they interact with each other and respond to their environment. This realm is not just about physical interactions but also about the implicit codes and patterns that living beings, especially humans, use to navigate the physical world. For example, animals and humans both leave tracks in their environments—birds in flight patterns, wolves in social hierarchies, and humans in roads and pathways. These behaviors serve as a form of mapping that reflects the underlying patterns in the material world, creating an alignment between creatures and their environment.

The behavioral realm is also where social structures, instincts, and survival mechanisms operate. In the context of consciousness, however, this realm represents a level of perception that is instinctual and subconscious, with humans perhaps exhibiting the most complex forms of behavior that can impact their physical surroundings and each other.

The Imaginative Realm: Capturing Behavioral Patterns

While animals operate effectively within the material and behavioral realms, humans add another layer to their consciousness: the imaginative realm. This realm allows us to form representations of our behavioral experiences in symbolic ways—dreams, stories, myths, and art, all of which mirror the world around us but also interpret and transform it. According to Nørretranders, the imaginative realm lets us hold onto patterns from the behavioral realm and apply them to new, abstract contexts. In dreams, for instance, we replay and explore these patterns through characters and dramas, albeit in surreal and often fragmented ways.

The imaginative realm allows us to capture and conceptualize experiences beyond the immediate physical moment, embedding them in symbols, stories, and characters. Literature, for instance, helps transform real experiences into a coherent narrative that conveys universal emotions and situations. In this sense, the imaginative realm is where meaning-making begins, shaping our collective understanding of existence and providing a space for individuals to explore and interpret the complex, often contradictory, aspects of their own experiences.

The Linguistic Realm: Mapping and Unpacking the Imagination

Nørretranders further asserts that language—our ability to communicate through symbols and structure thoughts—is a realm where we take complex ideas and compress them into words and sentences. Language, in his view, is a form of "unpacking" the imagination. Just as we might condense a multifaceted experience into a brief description, language allows us to simplify complex ideas for easier communication, though at the cost of nuance and depth.

Language both connects and restricts us. It enables us to share our thoughts and experiences, but it also places limits on our capacity to express the full richness of our inner worlds. For example, an artist may find that words cannot capture the essence of a painting, or a philosopher may struggle to convey abstract ideas. This challenge underlines Nørretranders' idea that language is a reducing function—while it opens new ways to connect with others, it also distills the vast landscape of consciousness into manageable, often oversimplified fragments.

Consciousness as a Reducing Function: From 11 Million Bits to 16

One of the most striking insights in Nørretranders’ work is his assertion that consciousness operates as a filtering mechanism. He highlights that the human sensory system receives approximately 11 million bits of information per second from the environment. However, only around 16 bits of this information reach our conscious awareness. This discrepancy underscores how our minds function more like high-powered reduction machines than broad-spectrum receivers.

This vast filtering process suggests that consciousness does not necessarily give us a "truer" or "fuller" view of reality. Instead, it distills a limited snapshot that we can handle and use. For example, when walking through a forest, we don’t perceive every leaf or branch; our minds focus on relevant patterns—a potential path, the sounds of nearby animals, or obstacles to avoid. By filtering out excess information, consciousness allows us to navigate the world efficiently without being overwhelmed by sensory overload.

The Problem with Modern Civilization's Predictive Mindset

One critique Nørretranders offers is that modern civilization's fixation on control and predictability has led to a kind of sensory and imaginative stagnation. In our efforts to manage and predict all aspects of life, we lose a measure of spontaneity and creativity. This is a mindset that resists the ambiguity and uncertainty that are fundamental to a fuller experience of life. When we insist on linear predictability, our minds become dull, as we no longer allow ourselves to be “irritated” by the unexpected stimuli that keep consciousness awake and active.

Nørretranders suggests that to counter this, we should find ways to refresh our sensory inputs and step outside the routine constraints of the predictable world. Engaging in creative, unstructured activities such as exploring nature, creating art, or even engaging with stories and psychedelics are some ways to reconnect with the richness of experience. These activities bring us closer to the realms of imagination and sensation, reminding us of the vibrancy that often gets lost in our pursuit of efficiency and control.

Toward a Holistic Understanding of Consciousness

Ultimately, Nørretranders’ approach suggests that consciousness cannot be fully understood without acknowledging its layers and limitations. Each realm—material, behavioral, imaginative, and linguistic—contributes to our experience of reality but also filters and shapes it in distinct ways. The material and behavioral realms anchor us to our environment; the imaginative realm offers symbols and narratives that enrich our experiences, and the linguistic realm allows us to share and connect but also constrains and simplifies.

By conceptualizing consciousness as a reducing function, Nørretranders brings forth a humbling perspective. Humans are not passive observers of a full reality; we actively construct our reality by selecting, interpreting, and often simplifying information. This conception of consciousness invites us to embrace both the power and the limitations of our awareness. Instead of seeking to control and predict every aspect of our lives, we might benefit from an openness to the unknown, allowing our senses to be “irritated” and refreshed by the world’s complexity.

In conclusion, the layered, limited, and often reductive nature of consciousness reveals that understanding does not equate to perceiving everything fully. Instead, true understanding may involve an appreciation of consciousness as a dynamic, filtering process that enables us to engage with the world without becoming overwhelmed by its vastness. By balancing predictability with spontaneity, structure with imagination, we can deepen our experience of consciousness in a way that honors both its expansive possibilities and its inherent constraints.

Consciousness and the Emergence of Self: Beyond Perception to the Foundations of Identity

In exploring the concept of consciousness, much attention is given to sensory processing, the filtering of information, and our experience of reality as a simplified construct. Yet, there remains a deeper, perhaps more complex, question about the emergence of the self within this realm of consciousness. If our perception is limited, filtered, and partial, what does that mean for the self we believe to inhabit? Where does identity arise within this conscious framework, and what are the mechanisms by which a stable sense of self comes to exist? This essay ventures into the subtler aspects of consciousness, particularly the emergence of self-awareness, memory, and the cognitive constructs that ground identity, exploring how these elements shape our lives in ways beyond sensory experience.

The Self as a Construct in Consciousness

In the study of consciousness, the self can be seen as an emergent property—a product of various cognitive processes that interact to create a consistent, albeit dynamic, sense of identity. Unlike raw perception, which involves interpreting immediate sensory input, the construction of self involves the integration of past experiences, memories, desires, and future intentions. This integration gives rise to what we call the “self,” a narrative that we continuously update to make sense of who we are, where we have been, and where we are going.

Neuroscientists and psychologists argue that the brain constructs this sense of self by assembling fragments of sensory experiences, memories, and abstract concepts into a coherent whole. This self-narrative serves a vital function, helping us navigate the world with a consistent sense of agency and continuity. However, this narrative can also be a source of rigidity, as the self, once constructed, seeks stability and resists change—even when change is necessary for growth. Our beliefs, values, and personality traits become ingrained, creating a sense of permanence that can become a psychological cage if not balanced with openness to new experiences.

The Role of Memory in Shaping Identity

Memory plays a critical role in this process of self-construction. Our memories act as a repository of past experiences that feed into our present understanding of who we are. Each memory is not a perfect reflection of the past but a reconstruction shaped by current emotions, beliefs, and cognitive biases. Research has shown that each time we recall a memory, it changes slightly, influenced by our present context and state of mind. Thus, memory is not only a tool for storing information but also an active participant in shaping our identity, with each recollection subtly rewriting our self-narrative.

In this light, memory functions less like a recording device and more like an editor, continuously refining the story of who we are. This malleable quality of memory means that identity is not a fixed entity but an ongoing process. As our memories shift over time, so does our sense of self. People who have experienced trauma, for example, often find that their identity becomes heavily shaped by those experiences, as memories of the trauma reshape how they view themselves and the world. Therapy can often involve reframing these memories, allowing individuals to reconstruct their narratives and, in doing so, change their self-conception.

Intention and Future-Self Projection

While memory anchors us to our past, the mind also projects itself forward, envisioning future possibilities and constructing goals and desires. This ability to envision a “future self” is another crucial aspect of consciousness that distinguishes humans from other species. It allows us to not only plan for the future but also to envision who we might become, setting goals that align with this envisioned self. In this way, intention acts as a bridge between the present self and the future self, motivating actions that serve to realize this projected identity.

The process of projecting oneself into the future is not merely about practical planning but also deeply influences our current identity. Studies in psychology suggest that individuals who have a strong sense of their “future self” tend to make decisions that are more in line with their long-term goals, even if it means sacrificing immediate gratification. Conversely, people who struggle to connect with their future self may be more prone to impulsive behaviors or decisions that undermine their future well-being. This future-self connection highlights the importance of temporality in consciousness—our sense of self is as much about who we were and who we will be as it is about who we are now.

The Dynamic Interplay of Self-Perception and Social Identity

Our sense of self is also deeply influenced by our interactions with others. From a young age, our identity is shaped by the feedback and perceptions of those around us—parents, teachers, friends, and society at large. This concept of the “social self” was notably explored by sociologist Charles Cooley in his theory of the “looking-glass self.” Cooley proposed that our self-concept is, to a large extent, a reflection of how we believe others perceive us. In essence, we form our self-identity in part by internalizing others' views and judgments.

This social dimension of identity has profound implications for how we experience consciousness. On one hand, social identity provides a sense of belonging and shared values, reinforcing our sense of who we are within a community. On the other hand, it can limit self-perception, as individuals often conform to societal expectations, suppressing parts of themselves that do not align with these external perceptions. This duality—being both liberated and constrained by social identity—illustrates the complexity of consciousness. We are not isolated minds but deeply interconnected beings, shaped by the social worlds we inhabit.

Cognitive Dissonance and the Evolution of the Self

An interesting phenomenon that arises in the context of self-awareness and social identity is cognitive dissonance, a psychological state where one experiences discomfort due to conflicting beliefs, values, or behaviors. Cognitive dissonance often serves as a catalyst for growth and change, prompting individuals to reassess their beliefs and realign their actions with their evolving sense of self.

For example, someone may hold a belief about their moral integrity but act in a way that contradicts that belief, leading to an internal conflict. To resolve this discomfort, the person may either change their behavior or adjust their self-conception to accommodate the inconsistency. This process underscores the fluidity of the self, as we are continuously adjusting our identity to maintain internal coherence. Cognitive dissonance, therefore, becomes a mechanism through which consciousness and identity evolve, allowing individuals to navigate and adapt to changing environments and new insights.

Self-Transcendence: Beyond the Individual Self

One of the most profound questions in the study of consciousness is whether the self, as a construct, can dissolve or transcend. Many spiritual traditions and philosophies propose that true self-awareness involves moving beyond the ego—the individual sense of self—and embracing a broader, more interconnected consciousness. In practices such as meditation, individuals often report experiences of “self-transcendence,” where the boundaries between the self and the world blur, leading to a sense of unity and interconnectedness.

This concept challenges the Western notion of the self as an isolated, autonomous entity. Instead, self-transcendence suggests that consciousness may not be bound to the individual mind but part of a larger, collective consciousness. Such experiences raise intriguing questions about the nature of identity and the ultimate purpose of consciousness. If self-transcendence is possible, it suggests that the self may be a temporary construct—useful for navigating the material world but not necessarily the ultimate expression of our conscious potential.

Consciousness as an Ever-Evolving Landscape

The journey of consciousness and self-awareness is one of constant evolution. From the formation of identity in childhood to the complexities of social self-perception, from the development of future projections to the potential for self-transcendence, consciousness is an intricate web of cognitive processes that interweave to create our lived experience. Our understanding of consciousness continues to evolve as science delves deeper into the mechanisms behind self-awareness, memory, and identity.

In closing, the study of consciousness is not just about the mind’s ability to perceive the world; it is about the continual unfolding of identity, the interaction between past, present, and future selves, and the quest for meaning in an ever-changing world. The consciousness that defines our sense of self is both a stabilizing force and a doorway to transformation, inviting us to explore the depths of awareness, the limits of perception, and the boundless potential for self-discovery. This evolving journey of consciousness encourages us to approach our identity with curiosity and openness, ready to redefine the self as we embrace new understandings of who we are and who we can become.

The Illusion of Perception: How the Brain Filters Reality and Constructs Consciousness

In the intricate realm of human experience, the interplay between perception and consciousness has long been a subject of fascination and inquiry. At the heart of this discussion lies an intriguing phenomenon: the brain’s capacity to filter, interpret, and construct reality, often obscuring the objective world in favor of a customized, subjective experience. This section explores the selective and interpretative nature of perception, examining how the brain’s processes shape our understanding of the world, our interactions with others, and our sense of self. Beyond mere sensory input, consciousness emerges as a dynamic, evolving construct, one that is deeply tied to memory, intention, social identity, and even cognitive dissonance, revealing how reality as we know it may be more of an illusion than an objective truth.

The Brain as a Filter: Selective Perception and Cognitive Shortcuts

Human consciousness is often thought of as an accurate mirror of reality, faithfully capturing the external world. However, neuroscientific research has shown that our brain is, in fact, highly selective in what it perceives. Given the sheer volume of sensory information bombarding us at any moment, the brain must prioritize certain stimuli while ignoring others. This process of selective perception relies on filters shaped by past experiences, emotional states, and cognitive biases, which guide our attention and influence what we perceive as important.

For instance, studies have shown that attention can be directed by emotional relevance. A person who feels anxious, for example, may become hyper-aware of potential threats in their environment, even if those threats are minimal or imagined. This selective perception extends to everyday interactions and social situations, where we may overemphasize certain aspects of behavior or conversation based on our mood or expectations. This illustrates how our brains filter reality in ways that can reinforce pre-existing beliefs and emotional states, often blurring the line between objective perception and subjective interpretation.

Pattern Recognition and Cognitive Biases

The brain’s tendency to filter sensory information is also influenced by its reliance on pattern recognition and cognitive shortcuts, known as heuristics. These mental shortcuts allow us to process information quickly and efficiently but often at the expense of accuracy. The brain’s pattern-recognition ability enables it to draw connections between disparate pieces of information, allowing us to predict and navigate our environment with ease. However, this same mechanism can lead to cognitive biases, where we see patterns or relationships that may not exist.

Confirmation bias, for example, causes us to seek out information that aligns with our pre-existing beliefs, while ignoring evidence to the contrary. Similarly, the “availability heuristic” means we are more likely to recall recent or emotionally charged experiences, which then influence our perception and decision-making. These cognitive biases shape our understanding of reality, reinforcing beliefs that may be flawed or incomplete. Thus, while the brain’s filters and shortcuts are essential for processing information, they often lead to a distorted version of reality that reflects more of our inner psychology than the objective world.

Constructing Reality Through Memory and Anticipation

Beyond the brain’s role in filtering perception, memory and anticipation further contribute to the construction of reality. Memory is not a static record of past events but a dynamic and often malleable process that reshapes itself each time it is recalled. This means that our memories are colored by our current emotions, beliefs, and even social influences, creating a version of the past that serves our present understanding of ourselves and the world.

Anticipation, on the other hand, is the brain’s mechanism for projecting future possibilities based on past experiences and current desires. This forward-looking aspect of consciousness shapes how we interpret the present moment. For example, an individual anticipating a rewarding experience may interpret neutral events more positively, while someone expecting disappointment may view even positive situations with suspicion. Through the combined influence of memory and anticipation, the brain weaves a continuous narrative that guides our understanding of the present, often merging past, present, and future into a cohesive, though sometimes illusory, sense of reality.

The Role of Self-Concept in Perception and Interaction

An often-overlooked aspect of perception is the influence of self-concept, the mental image we hold of ourselves, which can significantly alter how we interpret and interact with the world. Our self-concept is a combination of traits, beliefs, and experiences that form the foundation of our identity. This internal construct not only shapes how we see ourselves but also colors our perceptions of others and our environment.

For instance, an individual with a strong sense of self-confidence may perceive challenges as opportunities, while someone with self-doubt might interpret the same situations as threats. This self-concept acts as a lens through which we interpret social cues, body language, and even verbal communication. Psychologists suggest that this self-focused filtering helps maintain a stable sense of identity by confirming beliefs and narratives about ourselves, even if those beliefs are limiting or inaccurate. The process by which the self reinforces its own perception of reality can create a feedback loop, where our interactions with others are shaped by—and, in turn, reinforce—our self-concept, perpetuating our subjective experience of the world.

Social Reality and the Power of Collective Belief

While individual perception shapes personal experience, humans are also influenced by a “social reality,” a shared construct created by collective beliefs and social norms. This phenomenon is evident in cultural and societal standards, where certain behaviors, values, and even perceptions are deemed acceptable or true based on shared beliefs. Language itself acts as a medium for this social reality, encoding cultural concepts and norms that influence how we interpret and interact with the world.

For example, certain cultures have words for emotions that others lack, such as the Japanese term “amae,” which describes the sense of pleasurable dependence on another person. Such culturally specific terms illustrate how language and shared belief systems shape not only how we communicate but also how we experience emotions and perceive relationships. The social construction of reality emphasizes that our consciousness is not an isolated phenomenon but a deeply interconnected experience, influenced by the values, norms, and beliefs of the communities we belong to.

Dissolving the Illusion: Self-Reflection and Mindfulness

Given the subjective nature of perception and the illusion of a single, objective reality, the practice of self-reflection and mindfulness offers a way to transcend these mental filters. Mindfulness encourages us to observe our thoughts, emotions, and perceptions without judgment, creating a space for awareness beyond automatic reactions and biases. Through mindfulness, we can begin to see our own cognitive processes at work—the filters we apply, the patterns we seek, and the narratives we construct.

Self-reflection, similarly, invites us to examine our beliefs and biases, questioning the assumptions that shape our perception of reality. By becoming aware of these mental constructs, individuals can begin to deconstruct them, gaining insight into how their perceptions have been shaped by past experiences, social conditioning, and cognitive biases. This process of self-inquiry can lead to a greater sense of autonomy, as individuals learn to distinguish between the subjective lenses of their perception and the objective events that inspire them.

Consciousness Beyond Perception: The Quest for Objectivity

Ultimately, the study of consciousness and perception reveals that much of our reality is a subjective construct shaped by both individual psychology and collective belief systems. However, there is also an underlying human desire to move beyond these subjective interpretations toward a deeper, more objective understanding of reality. This quest for objectivity has driven philosophical inquiry and scientific exploration for centuries, as humans seek to understand the world as it truly is, beyond the limitations of personal perception.

One approach to this quest is the scientific method, which emphasizes observation, experimentation, and evidence as a way to uncover truths that transcend individual biases. By developing tools and methods that extend beyond human perception, such as telescopes, microscopes, and statistical analyses, science allows us to access aspects of reality that would otherwise remain hidden. These tools offer glimpses of a reality that exists beyond our subjective filters, reminding us that while consciousness is a powerful tool for interpreting the world, it is also limited by the very structures that enable it.

Conclusion: The Art of Embracing Subjectivity and Seeking Truth

In conclusion, consciousness and perception are complex, interwoven constructs that shape our understanding of reality in profound ways. While our brain’s filters, biases, and social conditioning often distort objective truth, they also provide us with a unique lens through which to experience and interpret the world. The journey of self-awareness and understanding involves balancing the recognition of these subjective influences with a pursuit of truth that transcends them. Embracing our subjectivity while seeking to understand and transcend its limitations may be the essence of human consciousness—a delicate dance between illusion and insight, where each step brings us closer to a more expansive understanding of reality and ourselves.

Unseen Architects of Perception: The Role of Memory, Emotions, and Cultural Context in Shaping Reality

Human perception is a profound, ongoing process that goes beyond simple sensory input to include complex influences such as memory, emotions, and cultural context. This section delves into the often-hidden forces that shape our subjective experiences, backed by real-world examples and research evidence. By understanding these unseen architects of perception, we gain insight into how our memories, emotions, and cultural backgrounds intricately sculpt what we perceive as "reality."

Memory as a Builder and Shaper of Perception

Memory is a dynamic, reconstructive process that not only recalls past events but also actively influences how we perceive the present and anticipate the future. Far from a static record, memory shapes perception by adding layers of past experiences, knowledge, and expectations. This phenomenon is best illustrated through research on "false memories," where people recall events that never happened, showing how malleable our memories—and therefore our perceptions—can be.

One famous study by psychologist Elizabeth Loftus demonstrated this with the "lost in the mall" experiment. Participants were falsely informed that they had been lost in a shopping mall as a child. Remarkably, many participants "remembered" this event vividly, complete with details that had never occurred. This experiment highlights how memory can create entire perceptions that feel real, despite being fictional. Thus, memory acts not just as a storehouse of experiences but as a creative force that can alter our current perceptions based on what we believe happened in the past.

The Emotional Lens: How Feelings Shape What We See

Emotions add a potent and often subconscious filter to our perception of reality. Neuroscientists have shown that emotions can alter the brain's interpretation of sensory input, focusing attention on certain details while overlooking others. This is why someone experiencing fear might see neutral facial expressions as hostile, or why a person in love might view the world in a brighter, more positive light. Emotions, by changing what we focus on and remember, subtly yet powerfully shape our experience of reality.

Consider the case of "emotional blindness," a phenomenon where strong emotions momentarily impair one's ability to perceive the surrounding environment. For example, after receiving sudden, traumatic news, many people report a "blurred" or "unreal" sensation, where their surroundings seem hazy or dreamlike. In such moments, the emotional impact reshapes perception, underscoring how deeply our feelings influence how we interpret the world. Emotions, therefore, are not mere reactions but active participants in constructing our subjective reality.

Cultural Context as a Framework of Reality

Cultural background plays a major role in shaping perception, often dictating what we notice, value, and interpret in any given context. Culture acts as an invisible framework within which individuals interpret their experiences, often unconsciously shaping their assumptions and responses. This influence is particularly evident in visual perception, where culture impacts even the way we interpret simple images.

For example, a study comparing East Asian and Western participants found distinct differences in how people from these cultural backgrounds view scenes. While Western participants tended to focus on prominent objects in the foreground, East Asian participants paid more attention to the background and context. This difference in perception reflects the cultural value placed on individualism versus collectivism: Western cultures often emphasize the individual, while East Asian cultures emphasize harmony within a collective context. Such findings illustrate how cultural conditioning shapes even our most basic perceptual habits, subtly influencing what we "see" and prioritize in everyday life.

Social Influence and the "Reality" of Group Consensus

Social context can also drastically alter perception, often through a phenomenon known as "groupthink" or social conformity. This influence is well-documented in classic experiments like Solomon Asch’s conformity study, which showed how individuals might change their perceptions to align with a group consensus, even when the consensus is clearly incorrect.

In the Asch experiment, participants were shown a series of lines and asked to match a line to one of equal length. While the task seemed straightforward, when the majority of the group intentionally chose the wrong line, many participants conformed to the group’s answer, doubting their own senses. This experiment reveals how social pressure can override individual perception, causing people to align their experience of reality with the group’s, despite clear contradictions.

Such social influences are not limited to controlled experiments. Real-life scenarios, such as political rallies or social media trends, often demonstrate the power of group consensus to shape individual beliefs and perceptions. For instance, during times of intense political division, individuals might perceive facts differently based on the prevailing narratives within their social circles. In this way, group dynamics and social influences can fundamentally reshape one's understanding of reality, showing that our perception is never entirely our own.

The Power of Expectations: How Mindset Influences Perception

Expectations and beliefs are powerful forces that shape what we see and experience. Known as the "placebo effect" in medicine, this concept extends to everyday life, where what we expect often becomes what we perceive. A classic example comes from psychology experiments in which participants are given a placebo (a non-active substance) but told it is a powerful stimulant or sedative. Remarkably, participants report experiencing effects like increased energy or drowsiness, solely because they believed the pill would have these effects.

Outside of medicine, expectation-driven perception can be seen in self-fulfilling prophecies. If someone believes they will perform poorly on a task, this negative expectation may impair their performance, creating a self-fulfilling cycle where expectations influence outcomes. Similarly, positive expectations—such as "beginner's luck"—can sometimes lead individuals to excel temporarily, solely because they believe they are likely to succeed. These examples illustrate how expectation is not just a passive mindset but an active force that shapes our interactions with the world.

Cognitive Dissonance and the Adaptation of Belief

Cognitive dissonance occurs when a person holds contradictory beliefs or experiences, prompting discomfort that often leads them to alter one of the beliefs to restore mental harmony. This process subtly reshapes perceptions as individuals adapt their understanding of reality to align with their beliefs or actions. A classic example of cognitive dissonance can be seen in the context of smoking, where smokers may rationalize the habit despite health warnings by downplaying the risks or emphasizing perceived benefits.

Research has shown that when individuals engage in behaviors that contradict their self-image or values, they often unconsciously reshape their beliefs to justify the behavior. This mental adaptation shows how perception is not static but a flexible construct, bending to align with the individual's beliefs, actions, and desired self-concept.

Sensory Deprivation and the Brain’s Creation of Reality

In situations of sensory deprivation, the brain demonstrates its powerful capacity to construct reality, even in the absence of external input. Studies on sensory deprivation have revealed that, when deprived of sensory input, people often experience vivid hallucinations as the brain attempts to fill the void. In one study, participants placed in a dark, soundproof room for extended periods began to see patterns, lights, and even complex images that were not present, created purely by the mind.

Such experiments underscore the brain's role in generating perception. Far from passively receiving information, the brain actively constructs experiences, suggesting that reality is partly a mental creation that the brain sustains even without direct stimuli. This phenomenon also highlights how adaptable our perception is—where the brain will create its own "reality" to maintain continuity, demonstrating the extent to which reality is an internal, rather than external, phenomenon.

The Constructive Nature of Language and Thought

Language also shapes perception by defining the categories and concepts we use to interpret the world. Linguistic relativity, or the "Sapir-Whorf hypothesis," suggests that the language we speak influences how we think and perceive. In an illustrative study, researchers found that speakers of Russian, who have different words for light blue and dark blue, were faster at distinguishing between shades of blue than English speakers, who use a single word for both. This linguistic difference shows that language shapes our perceptions, sometimes enhancing or limiting what we notice.

Moreover, language guides not just perception but thought patterns. Phrases like "seeing the glass half-full" or "wearing rose-colored glasses" reflect how language encapsulates and reinforces ways of thinking, framing our experiences in terms of culturally embedded concepts. Thus, language both reflects and shapes reality, coloring our perceptions in ways we might not consciously realize.

Conclusion: The Multifaceted Nature of Reality

In summary, perception is far from a straightforward reflection of the external world. Instead, it is an intricate, adaptive process shaped by memory, emotions, cultural background, social influence, expectations, cognitive dissonance, sensory processing, and language. Each of these factors acts as an unseen architect, sculpting our reality in unique ways that reflect both our internal landscape and the cultural environment in which we live.

Recognizing these influences invites a deeper awareness of the subjective nature of perception, reminding us that reality as we know it is a dynamic construct—one that blends the physical world with layers of psychological, emotional, and cultural meaning. By understanding these forces, we can approach our perceptions with greater insight, humility, and openness, acknowledging that what we "see" is often a reflection of who we are, as much as it is a reflection of the world itself.

Consciousness of Suffering, Sin, and Redemption: A Spiritual Journey Towards Transformation

The journey of spiritual consciousness is profoundly explored in the scriptures, offering insight into suffering, the awareness of sin, and the path to redemption. Verses such as 1 Peter 2:19, Hebrews 10:2, and Romans 3:20 offer a layered view of consciousness—a consciousness shaped by enduring suffering, recognizing sin, and ultimately being transformed. Through these passages, we gain an understanding of how suffering and the awareness of sin play integral roles in our spiritual growth and relationship with God.

Consciousness of God in the Midst of Suffering: 1 Peter 2:19

“For if anyone endures the pain of unjust suffering because he is conscious of God, this is to be commended” (1 Peter 2:19, BSB).

1 Peter 2:19 speaks to the spiritual honor that comes from enduring unjust suffering out of consciousness of God. This verse emphasizes that when we suffer without cause or face challenges we did not deserve, bearing this pain with an awareness of God’s presence brings spiritual value. This consciousness of God transforms suffering into an act of worship, as the individual’s focus is not on retaliation or self-pity, but rather on trust and patience in God.

Enduring suffering with a God-conscious mind reflects the life of Christ, who himself endured immense unjust suffering. It teaches believers to see their trials not as meaningless afflictions but as opportunities to express faith. By focusing on God during these times, they find purpose in their suffering, developing perseverance, humility, and resilience. This consciousness of God in suffering is, therefore, not merely a passive endurance but an active participation in divine transformation.

Awareness of Sin and the Need for Redemption: Romans 3:20

"Therefore no one will be declared righteous in God's sight by the works of the law; rather, through the law we become conscious of our sin" (Romans 3:20, NIV).

Romans 3:20 shifts the focus from suffering to sin, revealing that the law functions not as a pathway to righteousness but as a mirror reflecting humanity’s sinfulness. The awareness of sin—becoming conscious of where we fall short—is critical for growth, as it fosters humility and the realization of our need for God’s grace. This consciousness of sin is not intended to lead us to despair, but to drive us toward repentance and reliance on God’s mercy.

In this light, the law serves as a teacher, revealing areas of weakness and the innate tendency to fall short of divine standards. This realization underscores that righteousness cannot be achieved through human effort alone; it requires divine intervention. Therefore, consciousness of sin becomes a foundational step toward salvation, a necessary awareness that guides us to seek forgiveness and transformation. Without this self-awareness, there would be no motivation to grow, repent, or change.

Purging the Consciousness of Sin: Hebrews 10:2

“For then would not sacrifices have ceased to be offered? For worshipers once purged should have had no more consciousness of sins” (Hebrews 10:2, KJ21).

In Hebrews 10:2, the writer refers to the limitations of Old Testament sacrifices, questioning why they continued if they truly cleansed worshipers of the consciousness of sin. This verse brings into focus the temporary nature of sacrifices under the old covenant, which could not provide lasting freedom from sin-consciousness. Instead, these sacrifices served as reminders of sin, a perpetual cycle that underscored humanity’s inability to achieve holiness through ritual alone.

Under the new covenant in Christ, however, believers are offered a deeper, more enduring purging of sin. Through the ultimate sacrifice of Jesus, the aim is not just the forgiveness of sin but the cleansing of guilt and shame. This purging leads to a transformed conscience, where believers no longer live under the shadow of sin but in the light of grace. Thus, Hebrews 10:2 reflects the transition from temporary to permanent redemption, illustrating that true transformation occurs not through ritual but through a heart aligned with God.

Connecting Consciousness of Suffering, Sin, and Redemption

These verses, when connected, provide a holistic view of spiritual consciousness—a process in which awareness of suffering and sin leads to redemption and transformation. The consciousness of God amid suffering, as outlined in 1 Peter 2:19, teaches humility and patience, cultivating virtues that draw us closer to Christ. This experience of unjust suffering often sharpens our awareness of human frailty and the limitations of earthly justice, driving us to seek divine strength and comfort.

Romans 3:20, by highlighting the law’s role in making us conscious of sin, adds depth to this understanding. It shows that suffering is not merely external but internal; sin creates a form of suffering as well, a struggle within our own souls. The law’s revelation of sin exposes our need for redemption and our inability to attain righteousness on our own. This realization fosters dependence on God’s grace, setting the stage for genuine transformation.

Hebrews 10:2 then completes this journey by presenting the solution to this cycle of suffering and sin-consciousness—the final cleansing available through Christ. Through his sacrifice, believers are not only forgiven but are also freed from the lingering guilt and shame of past transgressions. This purging of the conscience enables a new life, one lived not under the weight of sin but in the freedom of grace and spiritual renewal.

Real-World Examples of Spiritual Consciousness in Action

In everyday life, these principles play out in remarkable ways. Consider individuals who face unjust suffering, such as those who endure discrimination, wrongful accusations, or social injustices. Some of these individuals, driven by a consciousness of God, choose not to retaliate but instead respond with patience, forgiveness, and hope. Their actions often inspire others and stand as testimonies to the power of faith under trial. This response transforms their suffering into a witness of God’s love, reflecting the essence of 1 Peter 2:19.

Similarly, the awareness of sin as described in Romans 3:20 is visible in people who, upon recognizing their flaws, actively seek to change. For example, those overcoming addiction often report a powerful awakening to the consequences of their actions—a consciousness of sin that propels them toward recovery. This awareness creates the humility needed to ask for help and make amends, underscoring the transformative power of acknowledging one’s weaknesses.

Finally, Hebrews 10:2’s notion of purging the consciousness of sin can be seen in people who have found redemption through faith, emerging from cycles of guilt and shame. For instance, individuals who were once burdened by past mistakes often describe feeling a profound sense of freedom after embracing forgiveness. This release allows them to rebuild their lives, shifting from a state of constant self-reproach to one of gratitude and purpose. In this way, their transformation mirrors the promise of a purged conscience, embodying the freedom that comes with redemption.

Conclusion: The Journey from Consciousness to Transformation

The journey of spiritual consciousness, as illustrated in 1 Peter 2:19, Romans 3:20, and Hebrews 10:2, reveals a path of growth through suffering, awareness of sin, and the redemptive power of Christ. Suffering endured with a consciousness of God leads to deeper faith and resilience, while the law’s exposure of sin reveals our need for divine mercy. Through Christ’s sacrifice, believers are offered freedom from the shame and guilt of sin, allowing them to live in the fullness of God’s grace.

In embracing this journey, we come to understand that spiritual consciousness is more than mere awareness; it is a transformative process that reshapes us from within. Through trials and self-awareness, we are drawn closer to God, shedding layers of pride, guilt, and self-reliance. Ultimately, this process moves us toward a life that reflects the compassion, humility, and freedom found in Christ, as we are continually transformed by the renewal of our minds and hearts.

[gigivas]

1K GIGI Prompts Collections 'Mythical Beings: A Vivid Fantasy Collage' 5737 Free 10 pages out of 1000 pages

Get Free 10 pages MTMEVE00545G_231_0001 – 1K GIGI Prompts Collections – Mythical Beings, A Vivid Fantasy Collage 5737 10PagesDownload 1K GIGI Prompts Collections ‘Mythical Beings: A Vivid Fantasy Collage’ 5737 series provides two documents, one document is 10 pages of prompts in 1000 pages, available for free download. One document is the complete 1000 pages of prompts, this is a paid service,…

[batsyheere]

"So, handling your archnemesis," Danny starts. The room falls quiet, heads slowly turning to look at the man as he writes the words on the chalkboard. When finished, the characters somehow both messy and neat at once, Danny places the chalk back down and claps his hands.

"I typically call them fruitloops. Often they're in a better position than you are- older, richer, more powerful. They may have some sort of status that protects them when facing the public."

Tim wondered where Dick was right now, and if he was laughing. His brain was lagging like a computer as he tried to process what Danny was saying, and how seriously a few of his fellow teen vigilantes were taking this.

"Some of their more common tactics are-" the chalk was picked back up, and Danny writes as he speaks.

"Manipulation, isolation, conditioning, and empathy."

MICE.

Tim stares at the board, and quietly slips put his phone.

-What have I done to deserve this.

Enjoy your lessons Tim-

His head thumps against the desk. Conner leans over, gives him a pat on the shoulder but returns to taking notes as Danny goes on to explain the conditioning tactic.

[bet-on-me-13]

The Ambassador

So! It was finally happening. After Years of Pleading with the Guardians and other Ruling Bodies of the Galactic Community, the Justice League had finally gotten then to agree to create an Alliance with Earth.

With an Alliance, Earth would gain the Protection of Multiple Empires and The Guardians, which would mean an end to the Constant Alien Invasions they faced. There was also the legal opening of Trade Routes between Planets to exchange Technology and Resources on the Galactic Scale.

Of course Earth would return the Favor, legally being able to defend it's Allies with its unusually large population if Superheroes and quickly advancing Tech, while also trading Tech and Resources between Planets.

Of course the battle was not entirely won yet.

They still needed to begin Negotiations to see if both sides would even agree to the Alliance in the First Place, as well as decide on the specifics of the Treaty. The United Nation's would decide on Ambassadors to represent the different countries, while the different Alien Governments would send an Ambassador Each.

When the Ambassadors arrived, they asked to be introduced to the Representatives of the Planet. Except, they claimed that there was a missing Member.

They claimed that there was one more Major Kingdom on the Planet, the most Powerful One, which they felt must be at the Negotiations.

When asked who this missing Ambassador was, they simply replied, "King Phantom of the Infinite Realms, he and a Shard of his Kingdom reside on this Planet, do they not?"

Now they are working around the clock to find this missing Kingdom, because the Alien Ambassadors refused to negotiate without the most powerful Kingdom at the Table, and they woud not wait forever.

Just who was this "King Phantom", and why had he not revealed himself yet?

...

Sam and Tucker sat on the Couch in their apartment, staring at the TV as the Chosen Representatives for America finished their Speech. Apparently the Peace Talks had been put on Hold for a few more days as they did some last minute preparations. Something about making their Guests more comfortable before they began discussing politics.

"Hey Danny, they're delaying the Negotiations for a few more days." Sam called over to the Kitchen.

"Aw, what?!" Shouted Danny from the Kitchen, sounding extremely disappointed, "I just finished making all the Popcorn!"

"I know Honey, its too bad." Tucker comforted his Partner, "Let's marathon Star Trek instead, how about that?"

Danny slumped out of kitchen and into the Couch between them, steaming bowl of Popcorn in his Lap, "I guess. We can make good use of all this popcorn at least."

Sam patted him on the arm, "Hey it's okay, the Talks will just take a few more days."

Danny shrugged, "Yeah, you're right. Man, what I wouldn't give to be in that Room."

[faeriekit]

I think Alfred needs his own prompt 👻(dp x dc)

Alfred had died.

(It was a bit of a waste of time— he'd been scheduled to get the boys to and from their suit fitting at this time. Now here he was; languishing. Murdered. Sulking, even.)

(How frivolous.)

As a busy man with children (an adult child) to care for, a house to maintain, and a budget to supervise, Alfred's main goal was to return to Earth, obviously. If he left Master Bruce in charge of the dusting, the man would absolutely let the unused parts of the house go into disrepair. Too impatient, his ex-ward was.

The only problem was that in this green, nebulous, and gravity-free afterlife, there seemed to be only one way out— navigating through the individual worlds that the denizens of this world have molded around themselves, until he finds a being willing to grant his wish to return.

Alfred sighed, checked for the pistol at his hip and the rifle on his back, and marched straight upwards. Or. Well. Downwards. Actually... Never mind.

[leafyeyes417]

Danny was tired. Tucker and Sam had drifted away over the duration of high school. The ghost attacks and danger had been the main factor that started the dissipation of their friendship. Jazz had left for college a while ago leaving him to deal with his parents alone. He had eventually created his own secret base and left the house permanently even if it was technically illegal at 16. No one noticed since he still went to school.

Including being a teen hero who wasn’t appreciated in Amity just was the icing on the cake. After receiving approval from clockwork and mastering his portal abilities, he closed the portal down. It wasn’t easy to do but he made sure everyone was out of the blast range when it shut down. The Fenton house was gone but it hadn’t been home for quite some time.

It was because he was so tired that he was where he was. Drifting out of Earth’s atmosphere, Danny let himself luxuriate in the feeling of space. It made his core hum pleasantly. He moved to a good spot still in Earth’s gravity and curled up and just let himself drift along in a haze. He toned down his glow and his body started to slowly fade into the space around him till he was practically invisible.

He floated in this haze for probably a week, slowly recuperating and feeling himself slowly change. There was no one to miss him for any length of time and he wasn’t worried about his human life at all. Honestly he probably would have drifted longer but something woke him up. Some guy yelling about conquering Earth or something.

Annoyed at being woken up by a fruitloop Danny allowed his form to grow with the power of space he collected and snarled out a “Oy fruitloop! I was woken up because of you! Shut up already!” and smacked him into the sun with a giant hand. Turning his ire on the army with the fruitloop he quickly sent them flying with a blast of power. It would take them many years to gather up again with how hard he sent them flying.

Huffing, he turned and glanced at the group of people left. Shrinking down he spoke and gestures wildly. “I was taking the best nap of my afterlife and was woken up by those pests. You gotta better place I can nap?”

Luckily someone was quick to let him know they had a place. He was guided to a space station soon after and was soon sleeping on the comfiest bed ever.

[sodatelle]

wandering

[kettlefire]

Justice League & The Observants

The first time The Observants appeared before the Justice League, they were met with resistance. The JL was more than apprehensive when it came to working with the beings.

A new side of their world was exposed to them. Since the day those things showed up at the watchtower, everywhere the JL turned, there was a new spooky thing to learn about.

The strange beings didn't say much. Appearing in the room through a swirling portal, took a look at the heroes and gave them a mission.

A mission. Like suddenly the Justice League works for them. Something that rubbed all the heroes the wrong way.

Yet, they had to take it. They couldn't let a town get absolutely destroyed and leveled just because they disliked the creatures that told them about it.

It kept happening.

Batman pulls out all the stops to learn more about these so called "Observants". Everything he could find.

It takes him down a rabbit hole. Finding out more and more about the world those beings came from. The Zone.

No one could really complain. The visits from the Observants were always short and to the point. A new problem has arise in the time line and they needed to fix it.

That was until the first time it wasn't one of those things stepping out of the portal.

This time it was a kid. Or something that looked like a kid, and this kid looked pissed.

He demands to know everything that the Observants had asked the league to do. Demands to be filled in.

The anger isn't directed at the JL. No, no. It's directed at the Observants. It seems the league aren't the only ones that despise those all-seeing beings.

He's a king. The kid is a King.

Not what anyone had expected, and it seemed the complication only grew more. The king, Phantom, informs them not to trust the Observants.

The Justice League takes it all in surprising strides. Confirms that they have done nothing wrong, and they haven't. It was simply that the Observants cared more of their own opinions than the betterment of the world.

However, it gets a little harder to keep a straight face when they are introduced to the God of Time.

Made even worse when the God, Clockwork, is a child. If they thought Phantom was a kid, this was a baby.

Except in almost a blink of an eye, Clockwork was an old man.

Things just kept getting more complicating and intriguing.

Before the Justice League knows it. They are essentially thrusted into the Zone's own problems. An inner war was brewing, and Phantom wanted to do everything he could to stop it.

[lazycranberrydoodles]

they are so in love and disgusting and also sarcastic bitches. follow for more / prev comic / next comic

[obsesssedblerd]

you and suguru, both curse users, going to private location so you can have a secret meeting with satoru. you two haven't seen him in a decade, so you're both unsure of what to expect. but then satoru arrives, and all logical thoughts exit your brain because holy shit, he looks so good. taller, broader, his voice deeper, his blue eyes covered with white bandages—something only he could make look so attractive. it's hard to focus 100%. your heart's pounding, your breathing is slightly uneven, and your stomach flips each time he says your name. at the end of the meeting, you notice that suguru's cheeks are slightly flushed. you both don't say anything, but you're certain that you're thinking the same thing: you have to have him.

the worst part? satoru knows, and he finds it amusing. ten years later, and you and suguru still can't hide how badly you want him. adorable.

[wannabemasterofwindintraining]

You could be nicer about it :((

[synchodai]

HBO's Continued Insistence on Dumbing Down Westerosi Politics

So there have been countless thinkpieces already on how GOT simplified the feudalist politics of Westeros (by giving a lowborn sellsword lordship over The Reach, by having no consequences for destroying the Sept of Baelor, etc.), but I haven't seen a lot of people talking about that for House of the Dragon.

The worst being that the show presupposes that Rhaenyra is the lawful heir when the books showed there are plenty of lawful arguments why she wouldn't be.

Mind you that I've been enjoying the show a lot so far. This is just to vent out my frustration with the writers' failure to fully engage with the values and protocols of the Middle Age-inspired setting. The show seems uninterested in laws of the Realm in a story ostensibly about politics, save for when they're using it as an excuse to amplify depictions of sex and violence.

Blacks vs Greens wasn't a matter of misunderstanding of who each side thought Viserys wanted on the throne. It was the Targaryens' belief of their absolute authority clashing with the Realm's established traditions. Everyone always knew who Viserys chose as heir. In Fire and Blood, Grand Maester Orwyle said as much when he was parleying with Rhaenyra on behalf of the Greens.

Rhaenyra heard his terms in stony silence, then asked Orwyle if he remembered her father, King Viserys. "Of course, Your Grace," the maester answered. "Perhaps you can tell us who he named as his heir and successor," the queen said, her crown upon her head. "You, Your Grace," Orwyle replied. And Rhaenyra nodded and said, "With your own tongue you admit I am your lawful queen. Why do you serve my half-brother, the pretender?" Munkun tells us that Orwyle gave a long and erudite reply, citing the Andal law and the Great Council of 101. Mushroom claims he stammered and voided his bladder. Whichever is true, his answer did not satisfy Princess Rhaenyra.

(For non-F&B readers: Munkun is the Grand Maester who served Aegon III, the king who came after this civil war. Munkun's book, The Dance of the Dragons, A True Telling, is one of Fire and Blood's source texts. Mushroom is the King Landing court jester from Viserys I to Aegon III's reign. One is a source written with academic rigor but is secondhand at best. The other is a firsthand eyewitness account but is from a literal fool who will take every chance to make things more scandalous and sexual to please the crowd.)

In House of the Dragon, they replaced Orwyle with Otto and Orwyle's discussion of legal precedent with Otto handing Rhaenyra a book page from Alicent. It's quite evident here that the writers, much like Mushroom, thought a discussion on the actual laws of the Realm were negligible in this story about a succession war.

Even Alicent made no pretense that Viserys chose Rhaenyra over her children and I have no idea why the HBO writers decided to make her mistakenly think otherwise. Maybe they thought a queen regent pushing her son to take the throne over another woman made her appear unsympathetic as a character, but if anything, this only makes show!Alicent less politically savvy and more delusional than her book counterpart, fully believing an addled king's vague muttering on his deathbed was sufficient grounds to change heirs last minute.

Book!Alicent following Andal laws instead of her husband's wishes makes sense given her Andal upbringing, her devotion to the Faith of the Seven which enforces said laws, and her desire to protect her children from Rhaenyra given that Rhaenyra has shown she's not above murdering family (see: Laenor).

In the books, there was a long discussion between the former king's council on who should succeed Viserys.

Here are the arguments for Rhaenyra:

Rhaenyra was older than her brothers and had more Targaryen blood

the late king had chosen her as his successor, that he had repeatedly refused to alter the succession despite the pleadings of Queen Alicent and her greens

hundreds of lords and landed knights had done obeisance to the princess in 105 AC, and sworn solemn oaths to defend her rights.

Here are the arguments for Aegon II:

many of the lords who had sworn to defend the succession of Princess Rhaenyra were long dead [...]

Ironrod, the master of laws, cited the Great Council of 101 and the Old King’s choice of Baelon rather than Rhaenys in 92

the hallowed Andal tradition wherein the rights of a trueborn son always came before the rights of a mere daughter

Ser Otto reminded them that Rhaenyra’s husband was none other than Prince Daemon, and “we all know that one’s nature. Make no mistake, should Rhaenyra ever sit the Iron Throne, it will be Lord Flea Bottom who rules us, a king consort as cruel and unforgiving as Maegor ever was [...]”

Should the princess reign [...] Jacaerys Velaryon would rule after her. “Seven save this realm if we seat a bastard on the Iron Throne.”

Once again, the show chose to cut out this long political discussion. Instead, the council had already made up their mind and decided to stage a coup (when in their perspectives from the books, it would definitely not be a coup).

For all their marketing how two sides are equally grey, HotD is actively delegitimizing Aegon II. The strongest argument for him is how his claim follows the laws of the Realm, but the show doesn't seem to care about the laws of the Realm or the political need to maintain a more predictable/tested transfer of power.

Instead, the show focuses on Viserys's relationship with his daughter and the mysticism of the Targaryen bloodline. In doing so, they emphasize Rhaenyra's strongest arguments for succession — that she's more of a Targaryen than her half-brother and that her father prefered her.

And what for? Because in our modern-day, we don't have male-prefered inheritance and people can only imagine misogyny as the only injustice here? What about the injustice of a monarch exercising absolute control, thinking that his "superior" heritage makes him above the established laws of the native people?

This is not to say Aegon II is unquestionably the heir. But this is to say that the show removed the political nuance of why people are questioning in the first place. Precedence isn't the end-all-be-all of succession, but neither is "because daddy said so".

[vwoop-prince]

YJ S3 Dick, still in the midst of his fever dream, hides underneath the 'souvenir' instead of behind some boxes, and accidentally opens the airlock trying to take care of the Parademons. The others get it to close... but not before Nightwing is thrown into space.

There, he stares at the ship holding his friends and mentors. There, he wishes more than anything that he can, somehow, survive. There, he tries to live, if only so his family don't have to bury him like Jason.

There, Nightwing dies, wanting to save everyone, even with the cold seeping into his bones far too quickly for a regular section of space.

Then, Dick opens his eyes to... Earth? There's a little house, and grass, and trees, but there's a bubble of green over it all. Outside of that green was an entire castle, one that looked like it should have far more support beams than it does for even a hope that it stays standing.

And the sky was swirling shades of that same green. It makes him think of Lazarus.

"Well, that's something you don't see every day." He whips his head behind him, a bit too fast for Earth's atmosphere, but it doesn't hurt him. Past the bubble of green was a blue-skinned adult in purple robes, the insides of a grandfather-clock fitted inside their torso, and a black staff with a stopwatch on its top. Beside them was a man with snow white hair, glowing green eyes, a crown of frozen fire dancing above his head, and the most galaxy-like cloak Dick's ever seen clasped to his shoulders. He's wearing... a hazmat suit? Maybe? The twinkling stars and odd lighting of wherever he is were giving him a bit of a headache.

But in front of those two, within this bubble, was...

"DICK!" Wally shouted with unrestrained glee, a blur overtaking his spot for barely a heartbeat before Dick's stuck in a crushing hug that he reciprocates once his brain stops feeling like its melting.

He doesn't know how long it took for them to calm down, but the man with the crown spoke up after a time, as Wally was still wiping their faces free of tears. "Welcome to the Infinite Realms, Nightwing." Dick barely even registered that he was still wearing his suit, but now it felt suffocating. "I suppose you're the one Clockwork was holding out for; There shouldn't've been enough Ectoplasm around you to form a Ghost, and your physical body's still in space. I can see why you like this one, though, Clockie," he states flippantly, turning to his companion. Almost like he didn't expect Dick to pay too close attention to what he was saying.

"Either way, there's two options for you." The man didn't let Dick swallow his tears and question anything. Dick's not sure if he's grateful or not. "First: Stay in the Realms permanently. You'll see Kid Flash whenever you want and learn to be a Ghost with the denizens of the Realms. Maybe find your parents."

"But..." Dick pulls away from Wally, keeping him at arms length, eyes flitting between them. The two outside the bubble were distinctly... ghost-like, so the mentions of 'Ghosts' make sense. But Wally looked... alive. A bit pale, a bit thin... but alive. Dick can't see any of his own skin to see if it was blue or tinted that way, but the Nightwing symbol on his chest kept flickering between its own blue and this 'Realms' green. "But--What about the others? What about you? Why can't you come home?" The last two, he focuses on Wally, because now he can feel a heartbeat beneath his gloves. Wally's alive. He's alive.

His friend just shrugs. "Something about their portals not fit for the living? I'm meant to wait for someone to figure out a permanent portal, but they won't tell me how long that'll take." Wally glares at the... 'Ghosts'? There was a heat to it, but it also seemed like this was a well-worn argument.

"The permanent portal was always an 'if', Wallace West. And that is entirely dependent on if Richard Grayson takes the second option," the clock Ghost--Clockwork?--speaks up. But instead of the adult Dick was expecting, there was an elderly Ghost in their place. Still with the time motif. Was that... more literal than Dick took it?

"Yes, the second option..." The crowned man glares daggers at Clockwork. The temperature dips below comfortable. Dick tries to blink the spaceship and stars out of his sight, withdrawing his arms from Wally to try and warm himself. Tries to remember he's not in space. "The second option is that you return to your body... changed. You'll be able to protect Earth better, stay with your alive family, save the Lost Ones... for a price."

Dick doesn't know if he should ignore the plural in 'Lost Ones'. He doesn't know if he's reading too much into how, in this Realm, apparently only his parents were able to be found. Where's Jason? He doesn't dare hope, but...

"What's the price?"

The man smiles and a ring of blue forms around his waist. It splits in two and travels up and down his body, replacing the cloak and whatever clothes he was actually wearing with a NASA shirt, worn jeans, and red sneakers actually duct taped together. The blue tint to his otherwise tan skin fades completely. His hair turns black. His eyes turn blue.

He was like a taller, slightly slimmer, way hotter version of Bruce.

The man walks through the bubble, but doesn't disturb the grass beneath his feet. "You become the Ghost King's vassal." Dick flinches away and almost hides behind Wally. "Not my idea! But, well... it is either this, or your permanent death."

"What does becoming a vassal do to him?" Wally asks, gently trying to stop Dick from breaking his ribs with how tightly he was hugging himself. Does he even have ribs?

"He gains my powers. Ice, electricity, invisibility, intangibility, flight... He becomes a Halfa. He becomes what I was, in life. Just... needing to make offerings to me, now and then. Something like that, at least. I give him powers, he gives me a chunk of, I don't know, chocolate once a week. Like a warlock."

Wally keeps talking to the man, keeps getting information that he knows he should pay attention to, but something in his chest screams to accept this deal, and he can't focus on anything else.

Nightwing can protect. He can return to life and go back to Blüdhaven, be the Vigilante they need. He can visit Gotham every now and then, help with cases and stop criminals from harming others. He can see his brother. He can see his friends. He can eat Alfred's cookies, and have little get-togethers with Babs and the Team--hell, he can argue with Bruce.

And all he has to do is... give an offering to this guy? The Ghost King? Every once in a while?

"There's no other price?" The King turns his attention to Dick. His eyes had shifted to a blue-green that almost hypnotize him. The green swirls, the blue forms and melts like snowflakes, and he can't look away.

He takes another step forward and Wally steps to the side. There was familiarity between them. Wally deferred to him. Dick can't quite tell why. Though, with how Wally hasn't once looked at Clockwork, maybe it's because he's... grounded? Are all speedsters in trouble with, what, the Ghost of Time? That... actually makes perfect sense.

"I'll be honest, Nightwing: You've impressed me." The weight behind the King's words lifts the ones that've been on his shoulders since he was nine. "You remind me of myself. Maybe, if I wasn't a Halfa... If I had a mentor... I could've been like you.

"Despite Clockwork's insistence over the years that I get back in touch with the living, I've held off. When he eventually suggested that I help create another Halfa, I locked him in his tower for twenty years. I didn't want anyone to go through what I had. But, now... I see that you won't. You can't. Even if you hide this deal--our shared powers... You'll still have people by your side. Strong people. Smart people. You can already handle yourself. And I'd love to see what you can do--who you can save--with my help."

There was maybe two inches between their faces when the King finishes speaking. Dick roves his eyes across the other's face, trying to find the common and familiar ticks that show lies and deceit and manipulation. All he finds is sincerity and genuine care.

Wally plays with his fingers from the corner of his eye, gaze hopeful as he looks between the two of them. Wally, who was alive and breathing and able to leave if he accepts. Eventually. Somehow.

Dick Grayson sends a quiet apology to his parents and hopes they will forgive him for being a little bit selfish.

"I accept."

He flings his eyes open. Above him, domino mask too wobbly to be properly secured anymore, was Robin crying and begging him to wake up. His hands were sloppily placed over his heart. Batman was trying to drag him away, the firm set of his jaw screaming grief.

Nightwing gasps once he registers his lungs burning.

There's a large cacophony of noise, multiple bright suits and people hounding over him, and the distinct artificial taste of slightly-too-much oxygen that the ship with the Parademons had. That he flew out of and died. He was still too cold.

Someone moves their arm beneath his knees and shoulder and Dick passes out.

(Dick 'Nightwing' Grayson dies in space. Ghost King Danny Phantom likes this too-human Hero. They split their souls in half, take one piece of the others, and all they know is that Phantom is now Nightwing's Patron Deity. Danny uses ice, for electricity killed him. Dick uses electricity, for ice killed him. They are opposites, and yet so incredibly similar. Clockwork was looking forward to when Danny starts putting off his paperwork to hang out with his new 'friend'.)

[x-crowmancer-x]

Enderpookie seems a bit different >:/??

[lera-draws]

i love drawing heart eyes

[heiayen]

this looks like us! gn!reader x various (kaveh, wanderer, zhongli, childe, kazuha, lyney, venti.)

summary: what things do they match with you? keychains, jewelry, clothing? let's take a look!

tags: implied modern au, around 80-100 words per character, just very short headcanons <3 could be ooc because it's my first time writing in a moment, not proofread that much

notes: ehhhh trying to get back into writing with short silly hcs... hello everyone. grand heia comeback 90% will make second part with more characters !!

Kaveh is the kind of person to have matching keychains with you! He has already got a keychain for his keys, a proud lion guarding the keys... that he manages to lose often anyway, so why not get another one? This time matching yours, and instead of attaching it to his keys (because gods forbid he loses them and the keychain!), he attaches it to his bag. And let me tell you, it does not end on a single keychain!

Most of the time, you don't even know that you are matching anything with Wanderer, seriously. If you ask him to get something matching together then, yes, he will agree, although begrudgingly, but also so often he will buy you something (while telling you to not make a big deal out of it, you're his partner, yes, yes, move on), and a few days later you will notice him having a matching pair of that thing. You never call him out for that, just smile to yourself.

As the gentleman he is, Zhongli is the man to give you matching rings or necklaces, all selected by him with utmost care. Every piece he gets for you two is one of the best quality, and he makes sure it fits your preferences, so don't worry if you wear only one kind of metal! He always pays attention to any stones in your jewelry, to ensure they are the best quality available. And sometimes, you find it so hard to bite down the urge to show off your new ring or necklace to all your friends, saying that yes, it's your partner who got it for you.

Childe is the person to see something that reminds him of you two, and get it, no hesitation. A pair of funny socks (with an animal that reminds him of you), keychains (that teddy bear was similar to you)... a scarf in the same pattern as his, because you need to be dressed well during winter, he doesn't want you to get sick– did he just point at those two chestnuts and said that it reminded him of you two? You don't see it, but whatever makes him happy!

Kazuha makes handmade yarn bracelets for you two, and he's quite skilled at it! He always picks your favorite colors, sometimes with matching pedants and pretty patterns, and you never know that he's making one, usually during late night hours, with the lamp's light as his companion, when sleep doesn't want to arrive. You got a few of them already but will happily accept every next one he makes, proudly wearing them on your wrists. It's always a lovely sight, to look at your joined hands adored by the bracelets he makes. Maybe you should learn how to make them too…?

With Lyney, you will more than often find yourself matching outfits... or at least pieces of it, if you can't wear a fully coordinated outfit. A matching shirt? Sure, that sounds great! You two can get some funny print together on it– or not funny, just a normal print. You two can also dress in a similar style if you don't have anything to match, or even match socks out of all things. Additionally, if you enjoy painting your nails... Lyney would happily paint his nails with a polish matching your eyes, and would gladly help you find one matching his, so that you two can match your nails!

Venti, on the other hand, likes to match... yes, hair clips with you. He got a bunch of them at home, all different. Ones with small flowers or stars, animals even, in so many colors and shapes– the point is, he's got them a lot, and he will happily lend you them so you two can have matching hairclips in your hair. He will also happily buy a pair if he sees one and likes it, and give you one of them. Soon, you will have an entire box of hair clips...