#thats his GIRL

[rosemilo]

Noa's face when Mae was being chased

Protective Noa incoming 🔥

[m0urn1ngstar]

lesbian that does NOT fucking play about timebomb

[eyluvu]

the JOY when i see that stupid monster james p sullivan on my screen again

[trashcanniballecter]

Steve: Robin is the girl of all time

Eddie: Robin is the girl of all time???

Steve: I'm so glad you agree

[saphstories]

Droid Sonic would kill for Daisy

Don't touch his Daisy. 🦮🦔🗡

[galaxysharks]

dewey feels like he might genuinely never forgive val when, after maddox checked back in after he brought her to his office after finding her wandering the woods, she flinches away when he comes close

The only reason he does forgive her is because shes young and genuinely sorry for her prank.

The single appearance of aggressive cuddles Dewey occurs. He does not put Maddox down for four days....

Movie night? Sorry he needs Maddie's help in the office

Color Wars? Maddox gets to ref them both, bias is encouraged this year

Play needs managing? Boy if you thought Gadget was bossy....

[soldierboys]

THE BOYS 4.02 Life Among the Septics

[chiangyorange]

the chain but on a scale of who says hooray yippee and wahoo

is this anything.

[toxooz]

also been thinking abt pooki with his cunty scarf💅

if my next drawing post isnt the comic update take me out back and shoot me like a sick dog

[anbaisai]

"(Sigh) We'll continue this another ti- mmf?!"

With a guy like Jamil, you really gotta pick up the slack sometimes. No tie to pull on though, so I guess we'll just have to use that hoodie!

(Inspired by this artwork by オレコ on Pixiv!)

Bonus Jamil for the rest of the day:

[ghostlyeris]

do you think that for a brief moment, even through the gumption of trying to get the qohlye to give sam magic powers, evan felt vindicated? he's never been terribly good with people but he's always been good at reading them. and now, after years of telling sam and her not really believing him, evan is being told to his face by the only being that knows the objective truth in the world that sam is exactly how smart as he always thought she was.

[xxplastic-cubexx]

filler

[muffinmoonn]

welcome back p-chan

[starjunkyard]

Obsessed with the degrees to which james wilson is a messy bitch. Primps and preens himself whenever he realises his boy best friend is stalking / sabotaging / psychological-warfare-ing him. Slept with his terminal patient. Immedicable people pleaser. Chronic adulterer. Three ex wives. PROPOSED TO HIS GIRLFRIEND AT SOMEONE ELSE'S WEDDING? Fuck you doin in the oncology wing my boy. Psychiatric ward is on the left corner

[idolomantises]

Rewatching Adventure Time, I can't help but think so much Princess Bubblegum discourse would be non-existent if people actually watched the show to completion instead of randomly hyperfocusing on some of PB's bad deeds.

There's a very bizarre and commonly held belief that Princess Bubblegum did terrible things and got away with it, that nobody held her accountable. When the show makes a point, repeatedly, that Princess Bubblegum is well meaning but deeply flawed, and to some characters, straight up evil.

I see fans point to "The Cooler" a lot as proof that PB is an irredeemable character, and while it is her worst act in the entire show.... I think people forgot that that was the point. Near the end of the episode she stops spying on people in Ooo because it was an invasion of privacy. In another episode she's called out for exploiting some aliens and lets them go. She feels ashamed that her own people are terrified of her. She loses her entire kingdom, and realizes she needs to get her shit together.

I'm pretty critical of shows that are way too lenient on flawed female characters but Princess Bubblegum isn't one of them. She's awesome, and heavily misunderstood.

[contagious-watermelon]

Why do I keep seeing transmascs and trans men insisting or implying that all trans men are "female socialized," or "understand the female experience," or "navigated the world as a woman." Because yeah, sure, that can be true for some people. especially if you weren't gnc at all as a kid and didn't crack your egg until well into adulthood, it makes sense.

But they don't stop at saying they had that experience. It always comes with an addendum that trans men, as a group, all can relate to this experience. I don't know about the entirety of my demographic, but I never got even a little bit of what some of them talk about. I didn't even believe that women were scared of going out at night until I kept consistently seeing them say it, online or wherever, for years. I never realized catcalling was a thing until I saw some women complaining about it on reddit.

But they posit it as some sort of, you're safer than cis men, right? You know what it's like? Which, on top of being patently, demonstrably false in the case of myself and many other trans men, holds some unpleasant and often outright hostile implications about trans women. And they always deny it, but if you can't even conceptualize someone like me who grew up gnc, and never got the bulk (or any?) of whatever we consider to be 'female socialization,' what does that say about what you think trans girls went through, growing up? I don't want to speak for them, as I've never experienced that firsthand, but I can guarantee that (if you're even a little bit obviously trans) people don't treat you like a cis kid of the opposite gender. By and large, they don't get treated like cis boys.

It just makes me mad that we're taking this inaccurate framework that (ever so conveniently) puts trans people into the box of our assumed birth gender, and trying to fancy it up and use it with a faux-progressive veneer; never mind the way that transphobes use it to bar trans women from being athletes, or using the bathroom, or having access to any gendered resources they need. It would be bad enough to try and dust it off and use it even if it were largely accurate, due to the aforementioned connections to outright transphobia, but it literally is patently false. Not in all cases, obviously, but why are we trying to revamp this untrue, inaccurate generalization and pretend that we can make it 'trans-inclusive?'