#so...precedents were set
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
Text
Thinking about Elizabeth Woodville as a gothic heroine is making me go insane. She entered the story by overturning existing social structures, provoking both ire and fascination. She married into a dynasty doomed to eat itself alive. She was repeatedly associated with the supernatural, both in terms of love and death. Her life was shaped entirely by uncanny repetitions - two marriages, two widowhoods, two depositions, two flights to sanctuary, two ultimate reclamations - all paralleling and ricocheting off each other. Her plight after 1483 exposed the true rot at the heart of the monarchy - the trappings of royalty pulled away to reveal nothing, a never-ending cycle of betrayal and war, the price of power being the (literal) blood of children. She lived past the end of her family name, she lived past the end of her myth. She ended her life in a deeply anomalous position, half-in and half-out of royal society. She was both a haunting tragedy and the ultimate survivor who was finally free.
#elizabeth woodville#nobody was doing it like her#I wanted to add more things (eg: propaganda casting her as a transgressive figure and a threat to established orders; the way we'll never#truly Know her as she's been constantly rewritten across history) but ofc neither are unique to her or any other historical woman#my post#wars of the roses#don't reblog these tags but - the thing about Elizabeth is that she kept winning and losing at the same time#She rose higher and fell harder (in 1483-85) than anyone else in the late 15th century#From 1461 she was never ever at lasting peace - her widowhood and the crisis of 1469-71 and the actual terrible nightmare of 1483-85 and#Simnel's rebellion against her family and the fact that her birth family kept dying with her#and then she herself died right around the time yet another Pretender was stirring and threatening her children. That's...A Lot.#Imho Elizabeth was THE adaptor of the Wars of the Roses - she repeatedly found herself in highly anomalous and#unprecedented situations and just had to survive and adjust every single time#But that's just...never talked about when it comes to her#There are so many aspects of her life that are potentially fascinating yet completely unexplored in scholarship or media:#Her official appointment in royal councils; her position as the first Englishwoman post the Norman Conquest to be crowned queen#and what that actually MEANT for her; an actual examination of the propaganda against her; how she both foreshadowed and set a precedent#for Henry VIII's english queens; etc#There hasn't even been a proper reassessment of her role in 1483-85 TILL DATE despite it being one of the most wildly contested#periods in medieval England#lol I guess that's what drew me to Elizabeth in the first place - there's a fundamental lack of interest or acknowledgement in what was#actually happening with her and how it may have affected her. There's SO MUCH we can talk about but historians have repeatedly#stuck to the basics - and even then not well#I guess I have more things to write about on this blog then ((assuming I ever ever find the energy)#also to be clear while the Yorkists did 'eat themselves alive' they also Won - the crisis of 1483-85 was an internal conflict within#the dynasty that was not related to the events that ended in 1471 (which resulted in Edward IV's victory)#Henry Tudor was a figurehead for Edwardian Yorkists who specifically raised him as a claimant and were the ones who supported him#specifically as the husband of Elizabeth of York (swearing him as king only after he publicly swore to marry her)#Richard's defeat at Bosworth had *nothing* to do with 'York VS Lancaster' - it was the victory of one Yorkist faction against another#But yes the traditional line of succession was broken by Richard's betrayal and the male dynastic line was ultimately extinguished.
66 notes
·
View notes
Note
They called me goofy...
:'D
well i'm pretty sure they won't do it again!
> follow up of this
#i traced the swords from a render sorry! don't have time to spend going all out on a gag 😂#and just in case i've set a precedent here by doing art twice:#i probably won't be able to respond to more of these like this but i did this one as a warmup today!#they might also have been calling another one (which i posted temporarily and deleted so you might not have seen) goofy#which was like this:#“what if morpho knight and the funny waddle dee were friends instead……. pwuldn’t that be so fucked up……………..”#but who can say! i guess we'll never know because it seems we won't hear from 'em again. rip. at least morpho sword is fast.#you know what. i'll tag it so i can find it later:#morpho#morpho knight#my sketches#asks
139 notes
·
View notes
Note
Carrie Kelley Robin for art request!! :)
This is either Carrie Kelley or Velma in cosplay, who could say
#dc#batman#carrie kelley#the dark knight returns#request#I like Carrie I don't like frank miller for what he did to Batman I said what I said#he set a precedent and now it's all dark and edgy#also I don't wanna talk about how long the background took me#I fiddled with so many ideas and shapes before getting frustrated and slapping in the squiggle#i've said it before and i'll say it again#I hate coloring lol#but drawing and inking this was fun!#behind the scenes fact: her hands were just circles for 90% of the drawing#before I sighed and said 'fine let's give her real hands'
224 notes
·
View notes
Text
can we please stop with the conspiracy that the government wants to ban tiktok because of pro-palestine content
do you realize how close that sounds to accusations of "zionists controlling the media" (i don't care how you frame it, it's an antisemitic conspiracy theory, please stop)
the us has wanted to ban tiktok for years because the company that owns it is chinese. they literally would let things go on as usual if they sell tiktok to an american company. that's it.
the primary driver is racism, not a conspiracy to shut down activism
#original text post do not steal#i think people forgot about the first pushes to ban tiktok#it got banned from being used on campus-owned phones at my school because they were so concerned about 'evil chinese spyware' or whatever#again: if they really wanted to shut down activism they wouldn't *just* be going after tiktok#and yes i know banning tiktok would set a dangerous precedent that would allow the us government to try other shit#but this has been going on long before recent events
66 notes
·
View notes
Text
I do think all of the adults had some part to play in creating the Dance but if I had to break it down to who had the most power to prevent it it would be Jaehaerys up to and including the Great Council, Viserys up until the moment Aegon is born and Otto from then on.
#jaehaerys could have named rhaenys his heir and prevented any sort of similar succession crisis from occurring in the future#all viserys needed to do was not get remarried and not have sons#i pass it to otto after that because the second that aegon came out male he began to scheme#(granted if viserys had stayed firm in his decision to remove him as hand i do think the chances of the dance go down#but this is still mostly on otto)#alicent's culpability is mostly from raising her sons to hate and fear rhaenyra's sons#so is rhaenyra's to a lesser extent but also for leaving king's landing and having three blatantly illegitimate children#(and then two blatantly legitimate children right after that)#daemon's is just from being generally unhinged and giving the greens legitimate reasons to fear for their safety#larys is the reason otto came back as hand#mysaria did technically help orchestrate blood and cheese#all the other members of the green council willingly committed treason#i was going to say corlys and rhaenys are blameless but no they pushed laenor into marriage knowing full well he's gay#forcing rhaenyra to have the aforementioned blatantly illegitimate children#also in the alternate universe where viserys chose laena they are probably a lot more culpable for that dance#but ultimately while all of the above are a series of bad decisions that culminated there were only three that could have stopped the dance#don't set a precedent that women inherit after men.#don't remarry or have sons after you've declared your daughter your heir.#don't scheme to usurp the rightful heir.#and that is why those three have the most culpability to me#house of the dragon
8 notes
·
View notes
Text
If you can vote in this election go vote, if you don't I won't be mad just disappointed... and also mad.
If you aren't American, vote in your country's elections if you can*
*if you live in a country that has a democratic structure, if you don't I understand and I wish for a better future for your country. There are still so many people who don't have this right and wish they had the opportunity to do what you can. The system may not be perfect but democracy is an easy thing to lose if you don't participate.
#But it's just one vote yeah but 1+1+1+1+1+.... Adds up to millions and even one makes a difference.#my family came to America to be able to live in a democratic country#therefore it's an obligation for me to vote because of those who came before me and left everything so they could be free.#i won't take the omg america is the worst country shit#america is unique in its long standing tradition of free elections and peaceful transfer of power#and yeah there is flaws and there needs improvements and there were improvements made#my family's country didn't have free elections until the nineties.#I think George Washington really helped define this country in a way by stepping down#there are so many countries that had democratic elections at first#but the people in power never leave office and set a precedent for corruption
8 notes
·
View notes
Photo
Red Tape tied in a bow (P1 | P2 | P3) (Patreon)
Also decided to give a go to the caption thing again since this one’s rather dialogue-heavy!
[Panel 2] Peepers: Uhm...sir? Hater: What. Peepers: Could you- do you have the full paperwork on our health plan?
[Panel 3] Hater: Health plan? Peepers what in grop’s name are you talking about??
[Panel 4] Peepers: It’s really no big thing, I just wanted to see what was (and wasn’t) covered-
[Panel 5] Hater: Commander Peepers. Are you planning to commit insurance fraud on my dime? And you’re asking me how?
[Panel 7] Peepers: P- hahahaha! I would never dream of it, Lord Hater!
[Panel 8] Hater: Then-? Peepers: I just want to see what’s covered, sir. Like I said already...
[Panel 9] Hater: Hrmph. It’s all personally approved by me, so feel free to ask, Commander.
#Doodles#Wander Over Yonder#Commander Peepers#Lord Hater#Oh I had an InOrdinate amount of fun with this lol#Bunch of quiet little inspiration pieces all clicked together into a full page in one sitting that was too fun to set down and go to bed lol#First of all doodling Peepers in a binder? Sparks joy completely#He's not satisfied tho - I considered angsting it up a little or having a discovery mini plot but I feel like those are so done :P#Rather just let him skirt the line and see how close he can get without tripping over it! :D#Hhhhh they're both so fun to drawwwww <3 <3 <3 Peepers with his expressive body language - his leg tucked behind the other in the second!#Also that BG >:3c Hater's room is cool haha#And then Hater himself ah ♪ His face is especially satisfying to work bit by bit until he looks like himself! :D#I was mostly striving for consistency in these so a lot of his expressions are quite similar to the preceding panels - hopefully noticeably!#The ones of him backlit and in profile tho were also very fun! ♪♫ Peepers' posing in the latter as well ahh :D#Even with that I still feel a bit restrained I wanna push him even further!! Cartoony!!! I get excited with every step closer hehe#Also thinking a lot around their early relationship ahh ♪ We never got to see their backstories ouq It's a shame#But we do see Hater and Wander's early dynamic and how Hater changes the more he's exposed to him lol so it's fun to extrapolate from there#A semi-serious paranoid evil electric skeleton man still getting used to having to depend on others <3 Until Peepers proves himself#I mean if he's already a Commander by this point he must've been doing something right but for Watchdogs that's a kind of low bar lol#It's fun to think he was motivated for his own selfish(?) reasons until he started seeing Hater as a proper comrade :)#But until then >:3c Trust very shallow all the way around! Awkwardness and uncertainty! Ah! <3
63 notes
·
View notes
Text
The tragedy that is the majority of viewers not catching onto the fact that Gamora had tons of internal cybernetics and an entirely replaced skeletal system when those are the only things that will remain long after she's gone.
#lex thoughts#universe: mcu#gotg thoughts#ive seen many people assume the silver markings were just. weird alien makeup and not the metal poking out of her skull#but granted i can't really blame them when the only mentions of the internal stuff being a quick aside during the briefing on Xandar#but. i still think about it and how it never really got brought up. almost as if it didn't matter because it was all mainly on the inside.#odd and offputting.#especially when it was always made a point to highlight the cruelty of involuntary body modification enacted on Nebula and (mainly) Rocket#bummer moment sorry i just can't get over vol 3 and watching everyone try to cover up her death as if it didn't happen#and that meaning they didn't go to Vormir so they'd be able to give her a funeral nor do they even seem very bothered by that.#very sad and depressing when yondu was allowed one and appearance beyond the grave multiple times but gamora..? Denied.#i also dislike OG Groot becoming nonexistent to the team post Vol 1 so i guess you could say the precedent had been set. but#even rocket buried a piece of him in that planter.#i wouldn't want to be a bunch of metal bones rattling around but i guess you don't always get a choice#and Gunn's tweet that he did think to include OG Groot and Yondu in Rocket's afterlife scene. but very specifically left out Gamora. sigh.
34 notes
·
View notes
Text
Exeter and Montague's claims to the throne were to make them the next victims of the paranoid king in 1538, and Anne could logically have used this threat to work on her husband's mistrustful nature. (This personal interest in the succession did not imply that they were genuinely trying to sabotage the succession of Elizabeth on their own behalf; presumably they regarded themselves as 'old' nobility opposing the 'upstart' Boleyns in the cause of honest English traditionalism, as on lower social level rural peasantry attacked the self-made minister 'Crummel' for trying to wreck the monasteries). The tradition of the royal kin resenting any 'low-born' intruders on their right to counsel the king was a long-standing one in medieval England; it lay behind similar grudges against 'upstart' advisers and 'favourites' under Edward II, Richard II, Henry VI, and Edward IV.
Royal Mysteries of the Tudor Period, Timothy Venning
#timothy venning#yeah...the thing about most of the counterfactuals that begin from the point of AB having a son#that is always kind of . mm. stretching credulity for me#is the idea that it would smooth everything over and there would be no more opposition to her#because there would still be these elements present#another problem with them is that they're not REALLY counterfactuals of tudor history; they're counterfactuals of like. tudors showtime#i could see her being very active in influencing the behind the scenes machinations of the exeter conspiracy#with or without cromwell...plausibly#they were threats to her#but i read this one where it's mary's arrest she tries to effect and she succeeds because mary visits aske#as in tudors...which did not happen#there's a lot of tudor fiction that just reads like tudors showtime fanfic tbh lol#i read one that referred to montague (correct) AND exeter (incorrect) as the poles...??#but yk. exeter was not in the tudors#i don't really think she wanted mary dead...1) that would have set a terrible precedent#2) it would have been so much better for her politically if she were alive and recanted her status#it's obvious that's primarily what she was seeking#the oaths had very little power in effect considering their targets (coa and mary) would not swear to them themselves#and considering everyone knew that...
4 notes
·
View notes
Text
very happy Matt decided to clarify his stance on the genocide of the Palestinian people rn. Pretty unhappy with the way he worded it, who he centered in his video, and disappointed to see the responses to it on Twitter.
kinda scared to even post about it bc CR fans can get so defensive about their favorite white people that they can often leave little room for criticism or nuance. but man I have thoughts.
#lemme just say. if you have a public platform that has set a precedent for philanthropic work. messages of positivity and love.#and have called attention to various political and social conflicts *in stream*. & whose employees and cast members are vocal#on socials about political topics#then it is NOT unreasonable for fans to expect them to address one of the deadliest orchestrated conflicts in recent history#a literal genocide is happening. thanks in part to the US.#it is good that they donated as a company and as individuals. so good!#but to everyone saying that publicizing good deeds like donations is virtue signaling or demanding CR cast to show their support is#or that activism shouldnt be all about what you post bc then it becomes performative#are kinda missing the point. and theyre not listening to palestinians at all#a huge issue with this conflict & the way its being received in the western world - ESPECIALLY the US bc of its partnership w israel -#is the sheer amount of disgusting minsinformation and propaganda convincing ppl this genocide is either not that bad or that its necessary#everyday citizens CANNOT change foreign policy. we cant do anything!#so what have Palestinians been asking us to do?? SPREAD AWARENESS ON SOCIAL MEDIA. MAKE PEOPLE AWARE. UPLIFT PALESTINIAN VOICES. SHARE LINKS#SHOW PPL THE TRUTH.#and yes its hard! its difficult to watch what theyre going thru. but we HAVE to.#i didnt rlly like matts statement. he said he didnt have the spoons to engage in the discourse. which i get. god i get it.#but ive also seen many many creators/influencers who are also disabled or whose families are directly involved gather their spoons to help#and no one was asking CR to harm themselves in the name of helping palestine. we only wanted them to spread awareness#bc the comments on their tweet about finally donating were full of mostly white centrist takes not able to see any benefit to donating or#addressing the issue at all. which is EXACTLY why CR should addresss it. bc they can reach so many who dont understand#but theyd been radio silent for almost 5 months. i didnt like that he didnt really apologize. i didnt like that he centered himself#i didnt like his lowkey flippant language either. saying all that.. ridiculousness in regards to a genocide not well worded.#but i dont feel right holding that against him. should he have thought it through better? sure but i get it#& unfortunately his parting message left a bad taste in my mouth - one of positivity & self care & hugging each other#nice important words but it didnt feel like he was talking about ppl who are affected by this conflict. but rather ppl who are watching#it just felt like a very white thing to say in response to this. we are not burdened and easily victimized bc of it#we are responsible. and so we must center palestinians.#if i were him i wldnt have gone in detail about how hard the palestinian genocide is for me to watch.#but thats just me#*CORRECTION: radio silent for almost 4 months
11 notes
·
View notes
Text
.
#datv spoilers#dav spoilers#veilguard spoilers#also is this just a thing now for bioware game since andromeda (because lmfao that WAS the last bw game we got)#that the protagonist feels so YOUNG? like say what you will about the writing for the inquisitor but they did feel like a full fledged adul#rook does not imo#is this like...trying to reflect an audience that skews younger or something bc im pretty sure no one wanted that#not even the younger people in question#is this just bc im becoming an Old?#like there's nothing wrong with protags being young i just really wish it didn't feel like they were WRITTEN that way#like give me some wiggle room#though i suppose the warden was written like that too to a degree#but there was more RP choice for the warden so like you didn't have to play into that#oh voiced pc. oh dialogue wheel. i love things about you but i also think you have set a precedent that is grossly limiting#when it comes to character customization#id LIKE to see if someone could marry the dialogue tree and a voiced PC#i think the witcher kinda did that but i never *really* played those and geralt was a pre-established character
4 notes
·
View notes
Text
"[Matilda of Boulogne's office as Queen of England], initiated and broadly defined by the coronation ordo, gave her royal power and authority to share in governance. Her obligations and activities were shaped by custom established by previous queens and the ad hoc needs of king and realm. [...] [Matilda's] thorough integration into the governance of the realm was not repeated in [Eleanor of Aquitaine’s] years as queen of England. Eleanor's coronation followed a new model that emphasized the queen as progenitor of royal heirs and subordinate to the king rather than as sharer of royal power. Though Eleanor acted as regent in England between 1156 and 1158 and in Poitou on several occasions from 1165 on, her writs suggest delegated rather than shared royal authority. In England, her power was limited by the lack of lands assigned to her use and by the elaboration of financial and judicial administration. Whereas [Matilda of Boulogne's] inheritance allowed her to play an integral role in politics by securing the Londoners' loyalty and a steady supply of mercenaries, Eleanor's inheritance provided her with more extensive power in Poitou and Aquitaine than in England. Until 1163, Eleanor withdrew funds from the Exchequer by her own writ, but unlike her Anglo-Norman predecessors, she was not a member of its council nor did she issue judgments from the royal court. Eleanor's counsel and diplomatic activities, in contrast to Matilda's, are rarely mentioned. She did, however, encourage the 1159 Toulouse campaign and supported Henry in the Becket affair and the coronation of young Henry. Eleanor was not a prominent curialis; she rarely witnessed Henry's charters or interceded to secure the king's mercy. She did follow in Matilda's footsteps in her promotion of her sons, cultivation of dynastic goals through the Fontevraudian tombs, and patronage that reflected her family's traditions. For Matilda, to be queen encompassed a variety of functions-curialis, diplomat, judge, intercessor, and "regent." Through a combination of factors, Eleanor's role as queen was much more restricted."
-Heather J. Tanner, "Queenship: Office, Custom or Ad Hoc", Eleanor of Aquitaine: Lord and Lady (Edited by Bonnie Wheeler and John Carmi Parsons)
#this is so interesting when it comes to the gradual evolution of queenship over the years (post-Norman to early modern)#eleanor of aquitaine#matilda of boulogne#queenship tag#historicwomendaily#english history#my post#don't reblog these tags but#the irony of the 'Eleanor of Aquitaine Exceptionalism' rhetoric is that not only is it untrue#but you could actually make a much more realistic argument in the opposite direction#We know that it was during Eleanor's time as queen of France that 'the queen's name was disappearing from royal documents' (Ralph Turner)#She did not enjoy an involvement in royal governance that her mother-in-law Adelaide of Maurienne enjoyed during her time as queen#As Facinger points out 'no sources support the historical view of Eleanor as bold precocious and responsible for Louis VII's behavior'#Even as Duchess of Aquitaine she played a secondary role to Louis who appointed his own officials to the Duchy#Only four out of her seventeen ‘Aquitanian’ charters seem to have been initiated by Eleanor herself#And now it seems that even Eleanor's role as queen of England was also more restricted than her predecessors#with new coronation model that was far more gendered and 'domestic' in nature#That's not to argue that it meant a reduction in the queen's importance but it does mean that the 'importance' took on a different form#There's also the fact that Eleanor's imprisonment and forced subjugation to Henry after the rebellion till the end of her life#was probably what set the precedent for her sons' 'Lord Rules All' approach with their own wives (Berengaria and Isabella)#as Gabrielle Storey has suggested#None of this is meant to downplay Eleanor's power or the impact of her actions across Europe - both of which were extensive and spectacular#But it does mean that the myth of her exceptionalism is not just incorrect but flat-out ridiculous
25 notes
·
View notes
Text
Dean "I'm not much of the praying type, but... I'm gonna pray for you" Winchester. And you have the audacity to tell me this man doesn't care? fuck you.
#spn#dean winchester#s1#1x12#1x12 faith#dean winchester thoughts#rewatching from s1 for the first time in 10 years and i have to say#this episode in particular has made me insane and also kind of set the precedent for the brothers#dean: did we do the right thing? aren't we just as bad because we're killing these innocents by proxy?#sam: yes well you're alive so imo everything is fine. also they were going to die anyway so?
9 notes
·
View notes
Note
Hi, what exactly did the royal charter excluding the Beaufort family from the throne say?
Hi! So in February 1407, John Beaufort, Earl of Somerset requested that the act legitimatising him and his siblings be confirmed by Letters Patent, which he duly received. At the same time, the royal charter that legitimised the Beauforts was modified by the insertion of the words excepta dignitate regali ("except to royal dignity"). I believe the royal charter is in the Parliament Rolls of Medieval England which I don't have access to but a 19th century historian published a transcription:
Be it remembered, that on Tuesday the fifteenth day of Parliament, the Chancellor, by the King's command, declared how our Holy Father the Pope had, in reverence of the most excellent person of the King, and of his honorable uncle the Duke of Guyenne and of Lancaster, and of his blood, enabled and legitimatized Sir John de Beauford, his brothers and his sister, and that therefore our Lord the King as entire Sovereign of his Realm of England, for the honour of his blood, wills, and hath of his full royal power enabled and of his own proper authority made the said John, his said brothers and sister, muliers, and also pronounced and published the ability and legitimatization according to the form of the King's charter thereof made. The which charter was read in full Parliament and delivered to the said Duke, father of the said John, and his said brothers and sister, the tenor of which charter ensueth. Richard by the grace of God, King of England and France, and Lord of Ireland, to our most dear cousins the noble men, John the Knight, Henry the Clerk, Thomas 'Domicello,' and to our beloved the noble woman Joan Beaufond 'Domicelle,' the most dear relatives of our uncle the noble John Duke of Lancaster, born our lieges, greeting, and the favour of our royal majesty. Whilst internally considering how incessantly and with what honours we are graced by the very useful and sincere affection of our aforesaid uncle, and by the wisdom of his counsel, we think it proper and fit that, for the sake of his merits, and in contemplation of his favors, we should enrich you (who are endowed by nature with great probity and honesty of life and behaviour, and are begotten of royal blood, and by the divine gift are adorned with many virtues,) with the strength of our royal prerogative of favour and grace. Hence it is, that, yielding to the entreaties of our said uncle your father, we do, in the fullness of our royal power and by the assent of Parliament, by the tenor of these presents empower you, who as it is asserted suffer from the want of birthright, (notwithstanding such defect, which, and the qualities thereof, we take to be in these presents sufficiently expressed) to be raised, promoted, elected, assume, and be admitted to all honours, dignities, [except to the royal dignity] pre-eminencies, estates, degrees and offices public and private whatsoever, as well perpetual as temporal, and feodal and noble, by whatsoever names they may be designated, whether they be Duchies, Principalities, Earldoms, Baronies or other fees, and whether they depend or are holden of us mediately or immediately, and to receive, retain, bear, and exercise the same as freely and lawfully as if ye were born in lawful matrimony, and you and every of you do restore and legitimatize : any statutes or customs of our realm of England to the contraiy thereof made or observed (which we consider to be herein fully expressed) in anywise notwithstanding. (Source: Samuel Bentley, Excerpta Historica, Or Illustrations of English History (1831))
Wars of the Roses historians generally credit this addition to Henry IV, historians of Henry IV to Thomas Arundel, Archbishop of Canterbury who was no Beaufort fan and in a powerful position during this time due to Henry IV's illness.
#i suspect the exclusion was prompted by the fact that the beauforts' position in the succession#had not been a consideration in their initial legitimisation#(not saying it wasn't thought about but that richard ii's solution to the succession problem was basically to put his fingers in his ears#and ignore it so he wouldn't necessarily care because as far as he was concerned he wasn't even naming an heir of his own body)#but henry's accession in 1399 probably ensured that it had to be addressed#another consideration is that henry had a health crisis in 1406#which would bring the succession to the fore in the public mind at a time when the lancastrian dynasty was still pretty fragile#and henry's sons were all still in their teens (late teens - but still teens) which might have made their succession seem more fragile#i'm not saying that henry/arundel viewed the beauforts as a threat to the succession of the prince#but that it may have been motivated by a setting out of the succession to avoid confusion#and to avoid alienating others who were of higher rank and precedence or had better claims (for example - edward duke of york)#beauforts#cardinal henry beaufort#john beaufort earl of somerset#thomas beaufort duke of exeter#joan beaufort countess of westmorland#ask#anon
3 notes
·
View notes
Text
hm. giving more thought to layla in relation to killing others bc the answer i gave off the cuff didn't seem exactly right. and it's very. grey, i suppose?
in general she doesn't go out of her way to kill people, sticking often to giving people second chances, even if the person doesn't seem repentant. but she also isn't going to spill tears for every person she kills (sorry ember, she's not as devoted to the idea as you, though she admires your dedication to it).
however there are times even she feels it's just not possible. with some she feels no remorse, such as with hulrun who she found vile in his zealotry, but in other cases it is. not smthing she takes any pleasure in doing, and is unable to let go of her sympathy for the person as she does it (wenduag....) to the point it haunts her long after it happened.
i suppose it's interesting in the two instances i can think off as the biggest examples of that scenario, with staunton and wenduag, she still tried to afford them some dignity or peace of mind in the end, like with allowing staunton to have a proper burial or with telling wenduag she was afraid of her potential in wenduag's last moments
camellia's death was an outlier, and is more an example in the position on having to keep making the calls on who lived or died affecting her negatively to the point she goes against what she would normally do in that situation, and then it haunts her because what if's will plague her afterwards.
does any of this make sense. no. i am tired and hungry
#ama mumbles#layla (oc)#lesson from this post: she is not a solider and she is being pressure cooked the longer in a position of authority she is#shes just a silly dhampir aha why are you making her a knight commander#also an interesting point to remember is she is a dirge bard! i know i make jokes about making skeletons dance and all that lol#but she has a genuine respect for the dead and the legacies they leave behind. she wont stop for every single dead but you know#she is not rlly leader but she also has very high charisma so ppl like to listen to her. unfortunately galfrey noticed this F#why do these deaths haunt you. bc i was incapable of saving them but perhaps they Could have been had smthing changed for them first#:for staunton and wenduag#versus bc i let my emotions get rid of someone i had come to trust over a span of a couple months in a single moment#i didnt even do it myself. for camellia#she Was going to let camellia live btw. but her emotions from wenduag were still running high alas#tho im sure she would have had to kill camellia later on anyway. and she would have felt bad about it then too tho probably. less so. lol#on discord i said she only kills in self defense which. is and isnt right necessarily. anyway i cant keep going on i need to eat#also another thin to take into account is she takes in the victims views into account!#playing through meeting hulrun before he is set on killing ppl on sight is i got to see his and embers convo#and it is so bad. but layla didnt kill him there bc ember said not to and her view on the situation takes precedent to her own disguist#anyway in her actual canon layla kills that man bc hes about to kill ramien she does not. get there early enough to have a calmish convo
4 notes
·
View notes
Text
I've already said several times how intersectionality was a scam and how ultimately Whitefem don't really like that about other demographics, but ngl.... I'm pretty impressed by how defensive & supportive they are with their faves.
Whitfem will NEVER shut up about Taylor Swift or Amber Heard. They will support them until their last breath and tbh big props to them for defending their own.
I wish Black women had the same fellowship. I am sick of seeing them pull out petition to release criminals out of jail (Tory Lanez) or shitting on other Black women to appeal to male (dunking in darkskin women or nappy hair again: it's a black woman who made a petition to "comb" Blue Ivy's hair when she was still a toddler.....)
Of course you'll never see "interesectional" White feminist care or speak up about those issues bc their intersectionality is a facade and they only care abt White women's struggle, but I wish they could at least be consistent and stop harassing ANY women not supportive enough of their White queens. No Ashley, I'm not going to keep tabs on whoever liked Johnny Deep post and be pissed at anyone who clowned Amber Heard....like you don't care abt men making racist or colorist comments about Black women..🙄 Cope and leave us alone. Your guilt trip will never work on us.
#don't u find interesting how the whitefem jumped onto the megan thee stallion ONLY when it#got convenient for them to do so?#i lost count of posts abt her who got like 'ANOTHER woman facing her abuser in a trial'#even in their performative activism they couldn't stop centering White feminism in their narrative#by using 'another' they catered to the narrative of Heard setting 'a precedent' for women facing men on trials#when Meg and Amber are TOTALLY DIFFERENT CASES#Meg NEVER used violence against anyone 💀#plus the Depp/Heard case was a CIVIL case#Lanez possessing illegal weapons was a CRIME#like.... it's insane how people hold overly simplistic views on everything and now whenever a woman face a man#in prison they'll be like iT's LiKe the DepP vs HeaRD tRiAl aGaIn#bestie it's not#and btw it's funny how whitefem where nowhere to be seen 2+ YEARS AGO when Meg got her foot popped#and that it made waves in the Black community and Black men were already mocking meg saying she was a liar#where were the intersectional whitefem to defend her??#WHERE WERE THEY??#oh my bad they didn't care bc it wasn't yet useful to them to use Meg as a prop for their 'another woman facing her abuser in a trial'#narrative bootlegging the Depp vs Heard trial#all of it makes sense when you're rubbing your brain cells but whitefem are to delusional to realize it and think we are dumb 👀#that's why I'll never be a mule and seethe against Depp btw lmao#this man is the last of Black women's problem ¯\_(ツ)_/¯#papi watch#papi truths#white feminism#whitefem be whitefeming
7 notes
·
View notes