#nut bowl

[vintagehomedecorshop]

Antique Brass Nut Bowl - Yellow Verandah

Vintage Brassware always brings charming aesthetics to our home, reminds us our rich heritage!! 

This handpicked Vintage Brass Nut Bowl is an old collection from 19C Rajasthani Royal Colonial era - a legacy from Haveli culinary & culture.

Serve dry fruits or dessert or pulav or place this exquisite decor piece on your coffee table or console as a timeless collection.

Each piece is collected and not newly manufactured. There may be multiple imperfections, damage, dent, color blemishes because this is an old piece. Each piece will be different from each other in color shade, texture, polish, finish, shape, weight, size. That's the beauty of old restored collections. That makes it special !!! 

Size : H - 2.5", Top Dia - 6"

Weight : 210 Gm

Buy: brass bowl

[fullcravings]

One Bowl Paleo + Vegan Brownies

[the-holy-ghosted]

congrats 2 henry peglar for being the only bitch confirmed as to be Fucking That Old Man

[ratatatastic]

"im excited to be here [in Finland]" is the understatement of the century matthew ill be real

Primetime Panthers | 11.6.24 (x)

[everythingwithwasabi]

Middle Eastern Rice

[vegan-nom-noms]

Jerk Tempeh Bowls with Mango-Tahini Sauce

[catguangcorner]

not to Read into it (im reading into it) but one moment i think could be a more subtle parallel w yu xia/lin zhen and cheng xiaoshi/lu guang is when lin zhen tells yu xia she's content in watching her enjoy the food she's made — cxs then jokes lu guang is probably jealous he can't eat the delicious noodles and lg says he doesn't really care/is fine with it. that struck me as odd cos he Does like gourmet food, and as he says it he's got a slight smile on his face too....

maybe, in the same way lin zhen is happy that the one she loves is enjoying this shared moment, lu guang (who as much as he tries to hide it, is not a heartless bastard) watches over cxs with that same feeling :)

[foodfuck]

spicy pesto and broccoli quinoa bowl with garlic bread croutons · dolly and oatmeal

[chapstick-child]

thinking of an edit to that boygenius song

wip btw

[deadpanwalking]

ooh! i am Not Like Those Other Anons, but if you're still feeling generous-- ldo you have anything about, say, the technological and social advancements in 19th century london-- i'm thinking bazalgette and john snow and building the london underground, henry mahew and london labor and the london poor, shit like that, maybe as a gestalt or the zeitgeist or what have you?

I love the specificity! I hope it's not a cop out, but if it's zeitgeist and/or gestalt ye be wanting, I want to recommend an author instead of a book: Peter Ackroyd.

My first introduction to Ackroyd was through a literary biography of T.S. Eliot, which he wrote during a time when Eliot's widow, Valerie Eliot (in accordance to his wishes not to be the subject of a biography) refused almost all applications to quote from Eliot's published work outside of a literary context, or to quote at all from unpublished work and correspondence. Ackroyd, who had managed to track down an enormous amount of unpublished material during the course of his research, tried to argue his case with Mrs. Eliot, but she didn't budge—however Ackroyd was confident that the material could still be useful, and went ahead, opting to paraphrase.

T.S. Eliot: A Life was considered the definitive biography of Eliot for decades despite the unavoidable awkwardness of the paraphrasing. “The lines of Eliot’s life are well-known, and Ackroyd does not effect, or seek to effect, any radical re-limning of them. [Ackroyd's] strength,” Eliot scholar and absolute lad Christopher Ricks writes, “is local detail, patience, circumstantiality, respect. [...] He eschews psychobiographical plunges, and this makes the book at once more satisfactory to the hungry and less satisfying to the greedy.”

The reason for this tangent (aside from Eliot monomania and the fact that Pyotr's vet seems to have forgotten us in the exam room) is because I wanted to give you a sense of how resourceful Ackroyd can be when he approaches his subjects from a distance, without scaling down his ambition or using sensationalism to force the impression of intimacy.

In addition to literary biographies, Ackroyd has written (and is still writing 🥳) a lot of books about London and Londoners—I've only read two: London: A Biography and London: Under. I know historical sociology isn't always the best approach and constantly undermines its own credibility by oversimplifying some aspects of a complicated subject at the expense of others—but when it comes to writing about an era, you can't get more zeitgeistian than psychogeographical writing that focuses on everyday life. You cannot. You'd die trying.

The title of London: A Biography is straightforward: London lives, so it makes sense to approach it the way a biographer would. It doesn't quite fit the limitations you set (19th century) because it begins in the Late Jurassic period. Nevertheless, you might appreciate it because—despite its insane scope and breadth—it does something really great, which I can't describe better than Patrick McGrath did in the NYT blurb:

This, then, is an unorthodox history of London that is fascinating not only for what Ackroyd selects but also for what he ignores. There is barely an aristocrat to be seen in these pages. The Earl of Sandwich appears when, unable to tear himself away from the gaming table for 24 hours straight, he puts a piece of beef between two slices of bread and invents one of England's few enduring contributions to world cuisine. The House of Commons is mentioned only because it burned in 1834, ''which provoked some of the most picturesque London paintings,'' including works by Constable and Turner. ''These artists recognized,'' Ackroyd writes, ''that in the heart of the flame they might also evoke the spirit and presence of the city itself.'' The great statesman Pitt the Younger appears only once, in connection with the ''Bog House Miscellany.''

The other book, London: Under, is going to fit you like a glove, but it's more of a companion piece than a stand-alone book, despite being well-written—Ackroyd doesn't start in the Late Jurassic period, but definitely takes the scenic route from Roman Britain to get to Bazalgette's sewers, and Pearson's Metropolitan Railway. One of the reasons I'm recommending it now is because I always pore through bibliographies and references to poach for more books to read, and I distinctly remember that Ackroyd's bibliography contained some fascinating titles that I will, realistically-speaking, never get to because my own interests and priorities tend toward the literary. RIP to me, but you're different!

[fullcravings]

V/GF Fluffy Pumpkin Oat Cookies (1 Bowl!)

[morethansalad]

Street Corn Bowl with Tofu Lentil Picadillo (Vegan & Gluten-Free)

[waitineedaname]

I love cooking so much

[greenpitbullzombie]

People think they are Officially Old when they reach a specific birthday or multiple joints start hurting. Really it's when you go grocery shopping and see a can of mixed nuts and go "Oooo" and put it in your cart with no second thought.

You can guess what I bought at the store today.

[everythingwithwasabi]

Tofu Pad Thai