#nor is he interested
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
Note
HII!! I LOVE YOUR WORK SO MUCH <33 So, I know Mycheal is asexual but people are asexual for many reasons. What is the reason for Mycheal being asexual?
He just is! đâ€ïž
#mushroom oasis vn#mychael ask#doodles#i understand the question came from a good place but its just funny to me hahaha!#uno reverse of âwhy are you gayâ#plus its only one aspect of his character#in terms of his biology theres somewhat a reason why#he just doesnt biologically procreate#nor is he interested#hes still panromantic!
2K notes
·
View notes
Text
Someone needs to do an analysis on the way the Kung Fu Panda movies use old-fashioned vs. modern language ("Panda we meet at last"/"Hey how's it going") and old-fashioned vs. modern settings (forbidden-city-esque palaces/modern-ish Chinese restaurant) to indicate class differences in their characters, and how those class differences create underlying tensions and misunderstandings.
#This is neither a criticism nor a compliment of that artistic choice#I just think it's really interesting#Like even looking at the Five:#Tigress talks in an older style than the others because she was mainly raised at the Jade Palace#While Mantis talks like Joe-schmo off the street because he *was* a streetfighter and an ordinary guy#Shifu and even Tai Lung talk like they're from an old-fashioned novel or kung fu movie#Po talks like a modern guy you'd meet working in a twenty-first century family restaurant#Part of Tigress's initial disdain for him in the first movie is clearly because she considers him to be low-class/a commoner#(And therefore an intruder into the world of the Jade Palace and the rest of the Kung Fu masters which appears to be semi-noble).#Shen looks genuinely off-put and disgusted when he has to respond to Po's greeting with a â...hey.â#And when Po wants to appear more legitimate as a warrior he adopts a more âlegendaryâ/old-fashioned way of speaking.#In the aesthetic language of KFP old fashioned=noble/upper class and modern=common/lower class.#This translates entirely naturallyâI think especially to an American audienceâbut it is wild once you notice it#Because you realize: âHang onâshouldn't *all* these characters be talking like they're living in the medieval era?â#âAnd what does it mean that they're not? What is the movie attempting to convey with thisâprobably entirely subconsciousâartistic choice?â#kung fu panda
3K notes
·
View notes
Text
Recently Youtube's algorithm really wants me to watch Schindler's List and I never had so the other night I sat down and actually watched it.
Having a lot of thoughts about it but a major one I keep coming back to is how even an immensely and deeply flawed human being can go against "just following orders" and instead put in the work to actually help.
It may never be fully enough. It may never save as many as you'd hoped. But when you have a choice to either follow orders or save your fellow humans in front of you, I hope you choose the latter.
Schindler died in poverty. He was not a renown war hero nor was he at all famous or widely beloved. But he saw that he could help, even in some small way, and so he helped.
He was a Nazi who saw what the Nazis were doing to Jews and said no more. Enough. If I can even spare those under my charge, maybe a few extras, then at least I will have tried to do something about this.
I think a lot of people do not fancy this type of activism. It is messy, dangerous, and often completely thankless. Schindler survived as long as he did after the war due to those he saved helping him with donations. He was not popular in his hometown due to his association with Nazis, he was not popular in Germany, he was not popular in Argentina. His businesses all failed. His wife left him. A movie about his deeds was released several years after his death, where he would receive none of the benefits. He went to prison multiple times for simply refusing to hate Jews.
I think a lot of people like to think they're activists, but are sorely unprepared for doing this type of work, and then in truth become activists in name only. This is hard work. But without him, another thousand or so people would be on that death toll.
He took his position of extreme power- a Nazi owning a factory almost entirely operated by Jews, making oodles of money off that cheap slave labor- and said you know what? No. I'm not doing that. I can't save everyone, but as long as they are within my factory, you will not kill my workers. As long as I'm here you aren't harming one hair on the head of any Jew under my care. You're not sending or keeping them in Auschwitz. You're not randomly executing them for entertainment. They're people. You're not murdering them.
"Just following orders" they say. But they didn't have to. They could have helped. They could have did what he did, look around and say "what the fuck am I doing here", and stop. He did. They could have. They didn't.
#I think it's also intereating that he did not do it out of compassion at first#he did it because it was smart capitalism#jewish labor was super cheap and they were desperate to be considered fit to work because otherwise execution was waiting for them#only after the cleansing of the ghetto did he say whoa okay holy shit yeah no I'm not doing this anymore#that's also true of the real man the movie is about#I also think it's interesting that not everyone he saved thinks he was a good person#but even still despite his flaws they respect and admire what he did for them#his motives were not always pure#but the fact of the matter is that when he saw what was happening he chose to act against it#he did not shrug and saw welp orders are orders#nor did he succumb to hopelessness when it became difficult to keep up what he was doing
2K notes
·
View notes
Text
having a normal one (thinking about how wilsons inevitable death is treated like the birth of a love story. thinking about how house refers to wilsons tumor like its their child. thinking about how they have a fight over their love for one another before resolving with an emotionally charged conversation on houses doorstep. thinking about how they abandon their individual futures, regardless of what those might hold, to have a future together, regardless of what that definitely holds)
#our little pal tumie is very interesting to me#house frequently characterized as parasitic. an inoperable tumor near wilsons brainstem that he doesnt want to treat#house accompanies wilson to the end of wilsons days#presumably to die with him#do you see my vision.tumie was the first mpreg baby on television#do not quote me on that. nor correct me#house md#james wilson#gregory house#hilson
569 notes
·
View notes
Text
When the only person who might understand what happened- understand. Not sympathize or empathize or comfort you but understand what happened, isn't there anymore. Or: 'A Man Made Me Do Something I Didn't Want To', for when you can't talk about it or look it in the eye [Patreon | Commissions]
#Tuvok#Kes#comix#idk how to tag this bc of the allusion#st voy#star trek voyager#bea art tag#comix page#star trek#this is not a one to one allegory nor is it meant to be - I am specifically focusing in on the loss of bodily autonomy that occurs when#Kes and Tuvok have their bodies taken over purposefully by men for various reasons which all boil to power. 'Because I could' and Because#they thought Kes or Tuvok wouldn't be able to stop them from doing so. Because they thought they had the power to do so so why wouldn't#they? But again this is not one to one - I interpret and will continue to interpret these instances in many different ways#But something that sticks with me in canon is how 'impervious' Tuvok is made - There is that scene at the end of Warlord which#shows that Kes is affected by what just happened to her - she's confused and hurt and doesn't know what to DO now that the in-the-moment#fight is over and it's time to just keep living and Tuvok comforts her but when he will go on to be taken over again and again and again#there will be no one to comfort him - no one HE can go to - and the narrative doesn't say that there should be. Even when he's#taken over by the BORG (an experience which had a lasting traumatic impact on characters like Seven or Picard - granted they were connected#for a lot longer) this is only mentioned offhandedly. One wonders why it occured at all. There's also how the other two main Vulcans#T'Pol and Spock - when they are forced to act emotionally or are in situations that affect their emotional equilibrium there is a big deal#made about it and they are hurt and ashamed and given some degree of care and comfort by those around them but when Tuvok#is forced into similar situations it is simply assumed he'll get over it - not even just by the other characters but the narrative itself#takes it for granted Ex: 'Workforce' where he forgets ALL his Vulcan training or 'Meld' where Suder's influence#unintentionally makes him lose it and try to kill him...THOUGH I think Suder hugging an unconscious Tuvok is perhaps the closest we get to#someone comforting Tuvok after he's been through that sort of ordeal. I'm not saying Tuvok would WANT others to be hugging him#and offering him emotional comfort etc (he's Vulcan) but I find it interesting that the narrative assumes that the black body (even alien)#is more 'durable' than its white counterparts. 'Stronger'. Assumes that there is no interiority which recoils and sustains the damage#when hurt. That there is nothing worth exploring because there is no impact from the impact. A crater lands and the Soil beneath it is#untouched
72 notes
·
View notes
Text
spoilers for chapter 429
idk if you guys remember but ochako does have parallels with All Might, specifically as the side who saves. Itâs not that he feels the same for them both or something like that, they serve to represent the type of heroism he naturally goes to; his friend is not his love interest, from his perspective sheâs out there having a crisis over not being able to save her, and Izuku reminds her that she is a hero bc she is his hero -she saved him multiple times, and she should be able to feel like a proper hero.
This conversation is not about the nature of their relationship, is about heroism; Izuku relates to a conflict between being a hero who saves and failing to save someone, and doesnât want to see Ochako ending spiraling because she couldnât also fulfill that role as expected. Sheâs his hero not because he loves her romantically -heâs a nerd Iâm sure he would be way more nervous and blushing if he was confessing anything he thought was romantic- but because sheâs able to go and do what All Might does to Izuku, save him physically and emotionally.
He knows she hides her feelings in order to not be a burden, yet he doesnât talk about his own feelings outside of his guilt in heroics -what does he feel about losing OFA? About his own failures? About the people he personally lost? He canât talk for others and claim Ochako is everyoneâs hero, but he can speak for himself, and thatâs his personal perspective -she is a hero to him, sheâs his hero. And then the class appears to make sure sheâs able to get support and understand sheâs not alone, and sheâs important to them too.
but Izuku doesnât get support. Izuku cries a little and talks a little about himself, but he doesnât get supported. If this was meant to be romantic, I donât understand why he would hold back whatâs inside of him.
the end of the chapter reveals that boy is going to be helped by that woman who regretfully ignored Tenko, and they both witness it and are happy about it while hearing izuku inspired that change, and iida wonders whatâs up with them -this is the conclusion to their relationship. In their hearts these two are saviors who struggle to be heroes who save others, and they are happy there are appearing more people who want to be heroes like them. Heroes who save. Save like All Might.
That grandma for example, interpreting the narrative as what I think is intended, would be that boyâs All Might; sheâs his hero.
Izuku and Ochako are heroes who save, and Deku is here to remind her at least she did save him many times, that she is still a hero because she is his hero. I donât believe is meant to be interpreted as romantic, not that Izuku sees that phrase as it neither -after all, he said he does want to be like All Might and feels good to imitate him, but he doesnât love him.
Ochakoâs All Might hair moment, the parallels with Toshinori telling him he can be a hero, the trying to save from black suffocating quirks, the we can do it and do your bestâŠ
Do I need to remind you heroes arent a romantic thing for Izuku Midoriya?
#grrr talking#bkdk#dkbk#bakudeku#dekubaku#Iâm not saying Iâm happy with the chapter#I have my criticisms#But I donât want to keep seeing ppl say this is romantic and âizu///ocha canon we won bkdk deadâ#First of all no itâs not even if it was canon we would still ship them and make content about them#Second of all this chapter was about ochako getting comfort not a boyfriend#Are we really sitting there believing they are together when ochako doesnât struggle nor think about her crush at all#And her character goes way beyond liking him or not#And izuku hero nerd midoriya calls her his hero bc he sees all might savior qualities in her???#Bitch whereâs the romance#And you know what? I donât get it now#Bc ppl were all like âyeah itâs platonicâ when izuku said he admired all might but katsuki was just right there closer to him#But now they see the whole âyou are my heroâ as a romantic confession? Fuck off#Personally I always felt kinda strange about that scene in bk vs dk 2#It focuses on the closeness and and itâs strange bc izuku doesnât strive to be like him at all#He doesnât want to be the victorious hero side nor want to be a angry and disrespectful when he gets angry#He just is#So. Yeah#ochako is part of the saving chain and she saved him multiple times since the beginning#This is his experience with her and she deserves to be acknowledged as the hero she is#Even if nobody else sees her as that including herself he sees it#She deserves to hear it#When she saved him during black whip with shinsoâs help everyone else saw a romantic moment#Mina teased her about it and made things weird for them always trying to look into it as a romantic gesture#And it wasnât. That was ochako being the hero she is and Izuku confirms that to her#She is a hero not a love interest
123 notes
·
View notes
Note
Bones someone did a "Worst Parents" poll over on Twitter and it's going about as well as you'd expect.
"God people will do anything to hate on mentally ill male characters" and it's the guy who hits and yells at his son.
"Crowfeather's only crime was being a bit mean" hitting and humiliating your son= bit mean.
Yes these are things I've actually read
I'm not saying Curlfeather (who was pitted against him in the poll) is better or worse than Crowfeather, but I've seen a lot of people downplaying his abuse towards Breezepaw and acting like people are crazy for thinking Curlfeather was better
It's really wild to see it in action, isn't it? When a dad manipulates (Po3 book 2) and smacks his son (Po3 book 3) for absolutely no benefit besides his own ego, it's "mental illness" and ergo not a big deal. As if they think mental illness is a get-out-of-jail free card for child abuse.
The "Crowfeather Mental Illness" Crowd couldn't HANDLE the kind of mentally ill characters that I stan. They are weak and will not survive the winter.
When they say "stop being mean to boys with a disorder" they mean "stop holding an abusive father accountable for teaching his son slurs so he could get back at the ex-girlfriend who dumped him." When I say "stop being mean to boys with a disorder" I mean that I want to give Breezepelt a gun so he can enforce it himself. We are not the same.
#bone babble#Curlfeather's an interesting conversation for 'bad parents' though and imo one of the best examples to discuss#Because she's so much more nuanced than the common mode of WC child abuse#She never physically hurt her child nor did she emotionally belittle her#But she did manipulate her. She did put her into a position of power. And I'm not a hypocrite like certain Hawkfrost stans--#--I think that is very damaging and Frostpaw's feelings are valid and understandable#Curlfeather died one of the most graphic and horrible deaths in the entire series for her child. But... that doesn't fix what she did.#I wish that the books were able to capture the complicated feeling that Frostpaw could be feeling about her mother right now though.#Crowfeather though he was a piece of shit#no ifs ands or buts#he was just Bad and the conversation is HOW bad#fennelposting
136 notes
·
View notes
Text
I wanted to share some wee thoughts about Ratioâs E6 art & why I believe it is a symbolic parallel to Michelangeloâs David. This speaks to both Ratioâs humanist beliefs and possible future plot points.
Ratioâs E6 is Vincit Omnia Veritas or Truth Conquers All. Iâve heard it claimed (although I have no idea if itâs explicitly stated anywhere?) that the characterâs E6 art represents them at their innermost core, an honest and deeply vulnerable shard of themselves. Evoking David here is an interesting choice; the biblical figure who, using nothing but a stone and sling, took down the tyrannical Goliath. The parallel is perhaps as simple as this: Ratio views himself - and by extension the truth - as the underdog, someone never accepted into the Genius society, forever to be kept from Nous and THEIR gaze, but nonetheless will, in the end, prove himself the final victor. Truth will topple the seemingly unconquerable, whatever that might be.
But I also think Michelangeloâs David is a specifically interesting parallel to draw on from a historical perspective. Ratio is pretty much the textbook definition of a renaissance man - he is a philosopher, a scholar, interested in medicine and science and the vast array of human achievement. He speaks in Latin (the language of education during the renaissance in Europe that allowed the transmission of information without having to rely on translation) while heavily styling himself on Ancient Greek symbols and drawing from Greek philosophy (often seen at the time as more âsophisticatedâ and interested in âwisdomâ than the contemporary âmilitaristicâ Romans).
Michelangeloâs David was the first colossal marble statue to be carved since antiquity, and it came to be a symbol of the renaissance itself. This is interesting to me for Ratio and what I believe are his humanist beliefs. Humanism was an ideal that propagated during the renaissance that championed the belief that man had beauty, dignity and worth that deserved as much respect and adoration as any deity. Keep in mind this philosophy was emerging following the Middle Ages and at a time where religious institutions across Europe held exorbitant and sometimes absolute power. David as a statue is an ode to the sublime beauty of the human body, completely unashamed and uninhibited in his gigantic nakedness (Doctor! Youâre huge!) retaliating against the idea that prominent idea at the time that manâs body is inherently sinful. The humanists sought to recenter humanity, and David became a symbol of manâs independence against the seemingly unconquerable might of the Church.
Consider how Ratio centres humanity in his Simulated Universe project, how he values every life, how interested he is in constant self-improvement. How this symbol - of not just the renaissance but of the re-centring of humanity itself - becomes an echo of an effigy fixed in the centre of his soul.
Ratio has never - as far as Iâm aware? - stated or hinted at any desire to overthrow the Aeons or even disparage or rubbish them, but it is clear to me that he believes in the strength man can draw on despite them, through sheer force of intelligence and clever planning and fiercely independent thought, the weak can ultimately overcome, or at least stand shoulder to shoulder with, the strong. Perhaps this will become a more pertinent plot point in the future - who knows? - but this was fun to chew through nonetheless đ«¶
#ratio#dr ratio#HSR#my witterings#Honkai star rail#important to note that the humanists werenât necessarily purely secular#some Christian humanists see David as a sublime symbol of man in gods image#but I thought this was interesting anyway#meant this to be a short thing but then rambled on OOPS#gets me thinkin tho abojt Rat being so Huge during 2.1#all his statue imagery and stuff too#just like the actual statue of David is fuckinnnn massive#which is mad right cause he was meant to be a smallie#but again itâs putting the focus on the strength and indomitable size of the human spirit right?#blabbity blah I love Ratio lol I hope they keep playing with him in future patches hhhh#I also really donât want to come off like one of those statue pfp retvn fashy people#nor do I mean to romantacise any of the figures / movements I talk about#just playing in the sandbox here with my toys lol
124 notes
·
View notes
Text
hot take but you guys are maybe a little too obsessed with elrond. he's just a guy.
#don't get me wrong I LIKE elrond but like#the fandom's constant veneration of him (far beyond what tolkien does) bothers me#the whole POINT is that he's humble and unassuming ok#he isn't the coolest specialest shiniest boi in middle-earth and that's fine!!#nor is he the 'only person in his family with a braincell' wtf#the way fandom's obsession with him puts him on a pedestal way above other equally interesting characters is just. a lot#like elros is always cast as his foil (less wise and less kind and less forgiving) and it's ANNOYING#not even getting into all the bad kidnap fam takes that come from this characterisation#high salt levels today ig
65 notes
·
View notes
Text
One of the biggest arguments Iâve seen used by the Ob*d*l*s against Anidala, is that scene in the ROTS novel where PadmĂ© says she could trust OW with the secret of the rebellion and was hesitant to tell Anakin and I just wanna say:
Padmé wasn't an idiot. She was an extremely intelligent and competent woman, perfectly able to understand that loving Anakin and thinking that he could be trusted with a certain politic-related matter were two very different things and reducing her choice regarding who to trust with an important political matter only on the basis of her feelings of romantic love diminishes her professionalism, and this is why I say y'all could never understand her.
PadmĂ© didnât have to "love" OW or even like him at all to know he was the perfect Jedi to ask for help in a secret political matter.
That's the point being made in the novel, sheâs hit with the realization that Anakin in this particular moment could not be told this piece of info because of his relationship with Palpatine, and PadmĂ© specifically mentions in the Junior ROTS novel that she didn't want to make Anakin âkeep a secretâ if he didnât agree with their stance because itâd be âunfair.â So this also played a part in why PadmĂ© didnât think it best to inform Anakin about the Rebellion. It honestly had little to do with her actually lacking trust in him, and more to do with the circumstances she was in not allowing her to be open with her husband and her not wanting to make him choose between his wife and his âfather figure.â
However, PadmĂ© knows OWâs political ideas aren't tied to ONE particular person but to a philosophy, one which is closer to her own, at that point. None of this was ever meant to be hinted as âromanticâ or even remotely insinuated as romantic. Itâs strictly professional and even the tone of the scene makes that so abundantly clear.
All Iâm saying is that, some of these proshippers are doing the most out here to try and prove their ship, like my loves? You forgot a very important thing called âš context âš and regardless of her rational thinking, PadmĂ© still went out of her way to try and talk out all of this Rebellion secrecy stuff with Anakin when she confronted him in the scene where she asks if he ever thought they were âfighting on the wrong side.â PadmĂ© didnât trust OW in the same way she trusted Anakin (with her entire self and being) she had the level of trust and love for Anakin that was only meant for him.
Mixing up her unwavering faith in Anakin as her husband with her trust in OWâs devotion to duty as her comrade/ally is purposely deluding yourself, because the two arenât the same and therefore canât be compared. An example of this is: PadmĂ© constantly putting more value to Anakinâs words over OWâs in the end of ROTS when he came to tell her of Anakinâs âcrimesâ. She completely disregarded what OW had claimed about her husband and instead made her way to where Anakin was herself, to ask him directly. Despite what the truth was, this is proof of her trusting Anakin unconditionally, and I didnât even think I had to spell that out because itâs as clear as day.
In conclusion, PadmĂ© didnât trust OW more than Anakin, she just knew the circumstances she was in didnât exactly make it easy for her to openly talk with her husband about these matters and thatâs part of what played into the issues they had in ROTS, itâs exactly what Sidious wanted. This scene in the novel doesnât exist to imply some hidden romantic undertone that George was intending all along. No, far from that. George was always an âopen, , clear and easy to understandâ type of storyteller, so if the former was the case, this scene wouldnât be any different if there was some hidden message or subtext the reader should be made aware of, George would make it obvious. Fact of the matter is, the one and only reason for this scene in the novel to exist is only to show to us as the âreaderâ that the narrative is tearing apart the Star-Crossed-lovers (Anakin and PadmĂ©.) and visibly putting the two of them on different sides in the story because the consequences of this narrative choice is what will foreshadow and play into the inevitable and great fall of the couple and character in the future. Even the novel makes a very purposeful and clear distinction between âlove and trustâ in this chapter where all this occurs. PadmĂ© loves Anakin, but knew she had to trust OW with the situation at hand. And if you want to talk ânarrativelyâ PadmĂ© needed a reason to keep the Rebellion a secret from Anakin, thus leading to Palpatine to sense âbetrayalâ in PadmĂ© later on, and using that to his advantage to manipulate Anakin even more into getting him to âsuspectâ her. Itâs all spelt out for us and itâs not hard to miss. All it takes is a little media literacy and understanding context.
(Mind you, hypothetically, if this scene existed for literally any other reason, it wouldâve been brought up again, but it wasnât. Itâs only mentioned once and exists for only one moment which was meant to serve a certain narrative and then it was done. Thereâs not much to make of it since the context of the scene is so clear.)
#star wars#anidala#anakin skywalker#padmĂ© amidala#sw novels#revenge of the sith novelization#revenge of the sith junior novelization#avoiding tagging and using full character names because I donât wanna attract those weirdos on my post#haters dni#anti ob****d*la#iâve seen shippers claim that ow and padme would make a better couple simply because they both value duty and share some of the same ideals#even though padmĂ©âs strong sense of duty doesnât define her personal identity#sheâs always wanted to leave behind her responsibilities to live a simple happy life with her husband#she stays out duty and care for peace and justice in the galaxy#which is actually a trait she shared with anakin not ow#anakin is loyal and dutiful because he cares about helping people and thatâs padmĂ©âs aim too#ow stays to help people because of his devotion to the jedi#thatâs not the same#saying sheâd be more compatible with ow is like the punchline of a bad joke#in every way padmĂ© shares more in common with anakin when it comes to the core of her personality#and relationships arenât built off sharing ideals mind you#itâs about connecting and sharing core values which is what anakin and padmĂ© always had#thereâs a reasons why padmĂ© and ow argued a lot in wild space#padmĂ© says the one thing her and ow can agree on is loving anakin otherwise their mindsets clash way too much#compatible? never in a million years.#padmĂ© herself disagrees#and apart from the fact that canonically padmĂ© never shows romantic interest in him#nor does the narrative include ow as one of padmĂ©âs love interestsâŠ#holy god my tags deserve their own posts
99 notes
·
View notes
Text
AND I MET THE CHANGE GOD TOO. OKAY. COOL OKAY
#I WASNT EVEN MEANING TO SO I ACCIDENTALLY SKIPPED THE DIALOGUE BEFORE I KNEW WHAT WAS HAPPENING FUCK#ill go and find it later if only to give myself peace of mind. BUT WOW. WHAT THE FUCK#my original plan was to 1) work my way to the king and talk to him 2) doom myself and take everyone down with me 3) loop back to floor 3#so i can visit the observatory and scrounge for any lore. although since i got killed that run siffrin asked the king to kill him first#which was intereresting. but i decided to have all doors unlocked that time around so i can just get the starcrest and go#but for some reason it wasnt working so i went to get the keyknife since i was already there and completely forgot i already had it#from the previous loop and THATS what triggered it. IT WAS FUNNY BUT ALSO SCARY BUT ALSO I THINK I GET WHAT THEY MEAN#about siffrin going back without actually changing. going along with a script even if his feelings on things change#the same way he has his own small rituals like the carving thing and does it for constancy. reassurance or safety even#and the times when he breaks script and ends horribly like the sadness attacking thing and bonnie yelling at him cause him to loop#to avoid it. although i cant really say anything bc id probably do the same thing. maybe not for the same reasons since im cruel#and make him do the worst to see what will happen since i put curiosity over rejection sensitivity as an observer and player but well.#i feel wrongfooted bringing it up since i dont have it myself but i have to wonder if this kind of leans into ocd tendencies.. i remember#reading something about how ocd is fuelled by fear. and things like counting and rituals are kind of used to cope with that?#if anyone knows anything more or talked abt it already id be really interested in hearing it bc im almost sure im not#the first to come to this conclusion. but i simply dont know enough nor have the confidence to broach the topic rn esp with how often#misconceptions around ocd get casually passed around so its hard for me to know what is and isnt a baseless assumption#puppy plays isat#in stars and time#isat#playthru#isat spoilers#in stars and time spoilers#isat act 3 spoilers#change god#WHAT WAS THAT WITH WEARING LOOPS FACE THOUGH WHAT THE FUCKKK
56 notes
·
View notes
Text
never understood why jack had a portrait of moxxi up in his casino. the place went under after BL2, and at that point they hadnt been together for years. and its not like what they had together was particularly happy or long lasting, either. they were together for maybe a month before breaking up pre-TPS, and thats not even mentioning what happens between them during the game itself, so... maybe its a trophy? it doesnt feel like one when theres also one of angel. but its all i really got because presumably hes been in a much happier relationship with nisha for years, even though the portrait does feel too sentimental for a woman hes hated for the past Forever. speaking of nisha, there's no portrait of her or his wives. which is doubly weird because surely theyd be here too if moxxi is. idk, moxxi and angel are just a strange pair to have it just be them. by themselves is fine, moxxi alone is easily a trophy. and imo its just weird for a portrait of angel to be in the casino in the first place. some secret siren, huh? but together? idk. it gives mixed messages.
#borderlands#handsome jack#mad moxxi#nisha kadam#angel borderlands#easy answer its a trophy. jacks possessive over them both and its very easy to just say he sees them both as objects to 'keep'.#cracked answer is that its not a trophy because theres no one there to even see it. itd have more fanfare if it was.#hes loud with his hate. he has quite literally never been able to shut up about what makes him angry.#so the portrait in the casino is. well its a tone shift!#idk where im going with this. i dont think jack is âin loveâ with moxxi nor do i want him to be.#more likley hes holding on to that period of time before everything Went Wrong like with the way he infantilizes angel.#hating the woman she is now but loving what he thought they had before. moxxi says he practically love bombed her when they were together.#this isnt a handsome jack hatepost btw this is a genuine look at why he would do something like this. it interests me.
56 notes
·
View notes
Text
Getting more context behind Anno's reasoning for cutting the Shingoji puppet from Shin Godzilla feels like really interesting insight into how specific he wanted the visuals of the Shin cycle, and a pretty fascinating demonstration of the paradox of he and Higuchi's special effects in those movies. I've described the Shin cycle's effects before as "pretentiously (affectionate) recapturing the Showa uncanny with purely digital means." Obsessive, perfectionist recreations of artifice and practicality through motion capture and CG animation.
Shingoji is animated and textured like he is made of rubber and as if he is rendered through practical means, limitations and all, yet Anno disliked the limitations of the practical rubber puppet. Shin Ultraman used an actual Neronga suit in its motion capture for completely CG animated kaiju. Zoffy's mask is a perfect 3-D scan of Ultraman Jack's asymmetrical mask. Shin Kamen Rider's recreation of the original show's look and effects is some of the most painstakingly digital magic trickery and post-production work I've ever seen in a movie of its like (the BTS videos are absolutely fascinating, highly recommend watching them).
I adore the special effects of all the Shin movies. I think Shin Godzilla looks fucking incredible, powerfully striking and uncannily creepy imagery, and nothing else on Earth looks remotely like Shin Ultraman. The animators and staff across the board did phenomenal work, and I think Anno and Higuchi's approach to CG, clearly understanding the uncanny artifice all its own, is a pretty brilliant understanding of the animation form over any sense of "better realism." The Shin movies are just a consistency loud and fresh grand statement on special effects as a medium.
However, it's hard to shake the notion that cutting that Shingoji puppet was something of a death knell for traditional Tokusatsu in Godzilla movies? Anno and Higuchi's paradoxical clear love and expertise for the classic special effects vs their execution and chosen expression of that love. It's just interesting to me, y'know?
And despite Godzilla Minus One's incredible success and the joy at its special effects being so lauded, it's hard to shake the notion that a more pretentious showcase of traditional suits and sets would have been nowhere near as well received. So much positive buzz for Minus One puts down so many of the other movies, unfairly and reductively, and I've seen a lot of that energy directed at the special effects. Minus One's realization and look should be praised alongside the special effects work or Invasion of Astro-Monster and Godzilla vs Biollante, not used to shit on them.
Just things rolling in my head lately.
#Shin Godzilla#Shin Ultraman#Shin Kamen Rider#Hideaki Anno#Shinji Higuchi#Godzilla Minus One#Takashi Yamazaki#when Minus One's available digitally and I can take screenshots I'm gonna make a post about how eerily similar he is to Shingoji's uncanny#despite being more outwardly expressive#they're both so similar to each other in very creepy ways it's interesting. That's neither here nor there.
157 notes
·
View notes
Text
'Punk Percy au'What au........Percy Jackson is canonically punk.He acts,thinks and lives like someone who's a part of punk subculture and gets called one in-universe multiple times even by himself.He dosen't dress the part but that's because he dosen't like standing out thanks to his trauma,not that he's not punk.What's 'punk' about acting out for attention and being mean to people for no reason and a pervert who dosen't respect their partners and ignoring politics and not doing activism and listening to designated general alt bands.You're literally drawing/writing a poser.A poser version of a canon punk character to boot.Put down the mortal au art canvas or the betrayed au fic doc and do legit research.If you won't,then don't make the au.You're not even punk dawg and skateboarding or being a nonblack tboy who's obsessed with masculinity dosen't count
#percy's not duncan from td nor a dcom love interest he's hobie brown and ekko from arcane#percy jackson#perseo jackson#black percy#latino percy#punk!percy#autistic percy jackson#transfem percy jackson#bigender percy jackson#team parent percy jackson#hero and destroyer of olympus#pjo#hoo#tods#antipercico#antilukercy#anti percy x gods#pastel punk tag#punk#punk culture#posers#x black!reader#đ#summerposting
31 notes
·
View notes
Text
Whb kings as books I have to read for the bac exam (vibes only tbh)
Lucifer - Luceafarul
They're the same, your honor! Both mean the same thing, morning star. It's a love story about the incompatibility between the genius and plebea (how Lucifer prob sees everyone else). Also, Luceafarul is my favorite and Lucifer's my fav king so there it goes.
Leviathan - Plumb
Dormeau adanc sicriele de plumb, they sure did. Bacovia lives in a grave, so does Leviathan. Also, they're both toxic and symbolists and pretencious tuberculosis survivors. It's a poem about being lonely and stuck in a toxic headspace, hey, look, just like Leviathan
Asmodeus - Ion
A man gets corrupted due to his lust for land and rapes a woman in order to get it, then proceeds to become amantul of his previous lover before getting hit in the head of a hoe. Tell me what about this doesn't scream Asmodeus to you! I think this is the only bac novel where they actually have sex. In Moara cu noroc and Ultima noapte de dragoste intaia noapte de razboi they cut to black before the actual sex can happen. But not in Ion! Rebreanu graces us with his wonderful sex scene of a man coercing a woman into fucking next to her sleeping dad.
Mammon - Moara cu noroc
It's about greed, they explicitly say it. The whole getting corrupted by greed (just like in Ion, oh my god, it's almost like they have the same theme). All of the characters eventually let their greed control their actions and it's both about the greed for money and love. Just a good fit.
Satan - Baltagul
It's a story about a woman getting revange for her husband's murder. The part where Vitoria just stared emotionlessly at the murderer getting mawled alive by her husband's dog was so fucking good- reminded me of Satan for some reason. There's a sense of community in the book, but also a very clear wrath that comes from the desire for justice.
Beelzebub - Morometii
Hear me out! Morometii is really funny, but in the cruder way than something like Caragiale's writing. The story does what every good novel does and randomly starts talking about the backstory of a character we met in a flashback, it really feels like Preda had some ADHD. It's about a disfunctional family in the interbelic era, its really Beel coded if you ask me
#whb#what in hell is bad#whb lucifer#whb leviathan#whb mammon#whb asmodeus#whb beelzebub#whb satan#I don't know anything about belphegor nor am I interested in learning about him#he just seems boring sorry#romanisme ig
41 notes
·
View notes
Text
âI preserve your happiness even when you don't or can't.â  âYou are over this, Louis! The pain of it has left you.â âStop it. This is too important a moment in our story for these games.â  âHe could remove them anytime he wanted to.â  âIt's a human perspective of time.â âWhy are we still talking about this? This should be behind us.â  âVampires with hobbies! Insanity.â âThe first vampire capitalist. The first vampire pilot.â  âWe were constantly cleaning up for them.â âHow long are we going to play games, Louis?â â[âŠ] a vampire of Louis' ageâ âLouis can sometimes act out. I protect him from himself, always have.â âNo, I clean it up! You make the mess and I clean it up!âÂ
#a sampling of moments where Armand condescends gaslights and or negs Louis across the series that I rattle around my skull#this barely touches upon the many suggestions he makes that Louis is indebted to him or Louis is incompetent#nor the moments where Armand tries to answers for Louis#I found myself mulling over these lines when I first saw the scene where Louis visits Armand in his office (aka âthe first vampire...â)#a scene that occurs during what the pair describe as the best and most harmonious period of their relationship#and Armand repeatedly sneers at and mocks Louis' ideas interests and sincerity#Armand#Louis de Pointe du Lac#Interview with the Vampire#Jagged Jottings
32 notes
·
View notes