#crime documentaries

[klfg]

[klrasmussenauthor]

8 Reasons Why We Love True Crime

We all have that one friend that knows just a little too much about serial killers and murderers. The nitty gritty details.Someone that would randomly share a fact about Jeffrey Dahmer or Ted Bundy, a grotesque fact about forensic science, or show an intense understanding of criminal trial proceedings. That friend is a true crime fan. And yes, there are more out there. True Crime has become…

[underthewingsofthblackeagle]

Why not combine both? Wouldn't that a good way to get more crime fans interested into gardening? Oh this gives me fan fic vibes :)

they love to make documentaries about murderers. what about old ladies who grow vegetables gardens. what are their secrets. how do their minds tick

[unitedstatesofworld]

The Enigmatic Saga of Steven Avery: Unraveling the Mystery 

Introduction

Steven Avery is a name that resonates with anyone who has followed true crime documentaries or read about legal dramas. His life, marred by accusations and controversies, has become a symbol of the complexities within the criminal justice system. From his wrongful conviction to his subsequent entanglement in another high-profile case, Avery's story is a rollercoaster of emotions and legal twists that continue to captivate the public.

Who is Steven Avery?

Steven Avery hails from Manitowoc County, Wisconsin, a small community where he was known as a regular guy. Born in 1962, his life took a dramatic turn in 1985 when he was wrongfully convicted of sexual assault and attempted murder, crimes he didn't commit. After spending 18 years behind bars, DNA evidence exonerated him in 2003, making him a symbol of wrongful convictions and the fallibility of the justice system. However, Avery's story didn't end there, as fate had more twists in store.

The Wrongful Conviction

A Miscarriage of Justice

In 1985, Steven Avery was accused of a brutal attack on Penny Beerntsen, a local woman. Despite having alibis and no physical evidence linking him to the crime, Avery was convicted based primarily on questionable eyewitness testimony. The case against him was riddled with inconsistencies and procedural errors, yet he was sentenced to 32 years in prison. Avery's conviction highlighted significant flaws in the criminal justice system, including issues with eyewitness reliability and the potential for law enforcement bias.

Exoneration Through DNA

In 2003, new DNA testing technologies provided the breakthrough that Avery desperately needed. The tests not only excluded him as the perpetrator but also identified the real assailant, Gregory Allen, a man already known for similar crimes. Avery's release after 18 years was a moment of both triumph and tragedy, as it underscored the years of his life lost to a flawed system. His exoneration case became a catalyst for legal reforms and raised public awareness about wrongful convictions.

The Teresa Halbach Case

A New Accusation

Just as Steven Avery was beginning to rebuild his life, another storm was brewing. In 2005, Teresa Halbach, a photographer, went missing after visiting the Avery Salvage Yard. Her charred remains were later found on the property, and Avery was arrested for her murder. The case drew widespread media attention and was later immortalized in the Netflix documentary series "Making a Murderer."

Controversial Evidence

The evidence presented against Avery in the Halbach case was controversial and heavily scrutinized. Key pieces of evidence, such as Avery's blood found in Halbach's vehicle and the discovery of her car on his property, raised suspicions. However, allegations of evidence tampering and police misconduct muddied the waters. Avery's defense argued that he was being framed by law enforcement as retaliation for his wrongful conviction lawsuit against Manitowoc County.

The Impact of "Making a Murderer"

Public Outcry

The release of "Making a Murderer" in 2015 reignited public interest in Steven Avery's story. The documentary painted a picture of a deeply flawed investigation and legal process, leading to widespread outrage and calls for justice. Viewers around the world were captivated by the intricacies of the case and the apparent injustices faced by Avery and his nephew, Brendan Dassey, who was also convicted in connection with Halbach's murder.

Advocacy and Legal Battles

The documentary spurred a wave of advocacy for Avery's release, with petitions, social media campaigns, and rallies demanding a reexamination of the case. Avery's legal team, led by high-profile attorney Kathleen Zellner, has filed numerous appeals and motions based on new evidence and claims of procedural errors. Despite these efforts, Avery remains behind bars, with his case continuing to wind its way through the legal system.

Key Points of Contention

Evidence Tampering Allegations

One of the most contentious aspects of Avery's case is the allegation of evidence tampering by law enforcement. The defense has pointed to various irregularities, such as the suspicious discovery of key evidence by officers who were not supposed to be involved in the investigation due to potential conflicts of interest. These allegations have fueled the belief that Avery was framed, making it difficult for the public to discern the truth.

Brendan Dassey's Confession

Brendan Dassey's involvement in the case adds another layer of complexity. His confession, obtained during a series of controversial interrogations, has been criticized for its coercive nature and lack of legal representation. Dassey, who was 16 at the time and has intellectual disabilities, provided a detailed account of the crime, which he later recanted. The confession played a significant role in both his and Avery's convictions, yet many believe it was coerced and unreliable.

FAQs

Why was Steven Avery's initial conviction overturned?

Steven Avery's initial conviction was overturned due to new DNA evidence that excluded him as the perpetrator of the 1985 sexual assault and attempted murder. The real assailant, Gregory Allen, was identified through this evidence.

What is "Making a Murderer"?

"Making a Murderer" is a Netflix documentary series that chronicles the cases of Steven Avery and his nephew Brendan Dassey. The series examines the controversial investigations, trials, and subsequent legal battles, highlighting potential miscarriages of justice.

Is Steven Avery still in prison?

Yes, as of now, Steven Avery remains in prison. Despite numerous appeals and ongoing legal efforts to secure his release, he continues to serve a life sentence for the murder of Teresa Halbach.

What is the status of Brendan Dassey's case?

Brendan Dassey also remains incarcerated. His case has seen significant legal developments, including a federal judge overturning his conviction in 2016, but this decision was later reversed on appeal. Efforts to bring his case to the Supreme Court have so far been unsuccessful.

Conclusion

Steven Avery's story is a labyrinthine tale of legal battles, societal scrutiny, and the relentless pursuit of justice. From his wrongful conviction and eventual exoneration to his re-arrest and ongoing incarceration, Avery's life encapsulates the complexities and potential pitfalls of the criminal justice system. "Making a Murderer" brought his story to a global audience, sparking debates and advocacy that continue to this day. Whether one views him as a victim of systemic failures or a perpetrator of heinous crimes, Steven Avery's saga remains a poignant reminder of the thin line between guilt and innocence in the eyes of the law.

[angela-thompsonn]

Always wished to be fucked real hard by a pretty trans with a big cock? Reblog and DM🥰💐

[folklorespring]

What the actual fuck

[pfhwrittes]

thinking thoughts about arsonist!soap again….

arsonist!soap who was sentenced for only 18 months because his counsel’s defence was extraordinarily good (and because he charmed the shit out of the judge, jury and prosecution with those baby blues).

arsonist!soap who was able to get a reduced sentence based on his brain damage and history serving. (“an entirely out of character and impulsive behaviour for Mr MacTavish, who risked life and limb countless times to protect his country” - a right load of pish if you asked johnny but he knew when to keep his mouth shut.)

arsonist!soap who has been ringing his bonnie wee thing everyday, leaving multiple minute long voicemails talking about all the dates he’ll take you on when he’s out, if you’ve cut your hair, if you got the tattoo of his name in a flaming heart covered over or lasered off, if his dog misses him, if kyle has been by tae see you.

arsonist!soap who writes pages and pages to kyle asking about you when you don’t return his calls or ever accept his offers to visit.

arsonist!soap who hoards the “candid” photos kyle takes of you and guards them viciously from the screws and other inmates.

arsonist!soap who can smell accelerant and ash in his dreams and wakes up burning every single day.

arsonist!soap who gets his sentence extended for putting a nonce in the medical wing instead of keeping his head down after he heard the dirty cunt bragging about what he’d done.

arsonist!soap who stays a million miles away from the god botherers that want him to “see the light and accept the Lord into his heart”. he knows what his God has to say about his Sins and he can live with that.

arsonist!soap who is flooded with letters from all kinds of loonies looking for a bit of rough but happily shares them with his stoic cell mate and pretends not to hear the wet slick slide of simon’s hand under the shitty blankets after lights out.

arsonist!soap who after 4 years inside gets picked up by his shaking sister and asks her to drive the long way home just to catch a glimpse of the flat he used to share with you…

[mikonezz]

disappointed but not surprised

[ms-hells-bells]

discovered an amazing youtube channel called real horror, who does history and crime videos. she only has a few videos on her channel, as she has a full time museum job, and she researches, script writes, narrates, and edits the videos all herself, but she's incredible. her voice is so soothing and smooth, and she is super respectful of any topic she talks about, always getting permission from relatives, or contacting the relevant people to get the facts (if they wish to give them).

but what drives me insane, and seemingly her from a few comments i have seen her make, is that a ton of the comments praise the work of 'the channel creator', but presume that she, the narrator, is not the channel creator and script writer. the say stuff like 'your videos are amazing! and i love the voice of the narrator', and just very clearly viewing the channel owner and narrator as two distinct entities. when she clarifies that it's all her, they're surprised.

you NEVER see this on faceless narrated male documentary style channels. it's presumed until otherwise said that they are the ones who also researched and wrote everything. but for her, they immediately think that a man is running the channel, and she's just a hired voice for a script a man wrote. it's wild to see.

[xoheisse]

If you haven't watched the documentary 20 Days in Mariupol, I'll share some of the footage from it with you.

The doctors continued to work for weeks despite the fact that they lacked medicines, water and electricity.

Residents of the city had no food, water or electricity, and cooked on fires in the street.

This wasn't shown in the film, but people in Mariupol could eat animals, such as pigeons, because of the lack of food, and also shared 1 glass of water among a large number of people because there was no other water.

No one called on russia and no one wants to be with russia.

A mass grave.

russians shelled the maternity hospital.

russians shelled people and residential buildings with tanks.

[marvel-lous-guy]

*Avengers Watching a true crime documentary*

Peter: Why do we give serial killers cool names?

Tony: What do you mean?

Peter: We give them cool names like "the Zodiac killer". Imagine everyone knowing you as "the zodiac killer"! That'd be awesome!

Steve: What?

Peter: Like, why don't we call them stupid names or like "killer 16" or "serial killer 23". Thats boring, they'd hate that

Bucky: but thats boring for us

[salembehindbars]

To the untrained eye I may be off-putting and strange and even a loser but to the trained eye, I am a hauntingly esoteric dream girl with a poetic, mysterious aura and a hunger for knowledge.

[iguessricciardo]

it’s looking like a crime scene

[folklorespring]

TW explosion sounds

July 27 is the Medical Workers Day in Ukraine.

"20 Days in Mariupol" (2023) dir. Mstyslav Chernov

[trexalicious]

I can't wait for this documentary to drop! From the preliminary news being reported, it sounds like we might finally be getting some new information...🤞

Journalist and royal expert Ulrike Grunewald will present the documentary, which promises to uncover "fresh secrets" about the royal couple. Reports suggest that the journalist travelled to California with a team of five people to investigate Montecito and gather information from the neighbourhood where the couple resides...

https://www.skynews.com.au/lifestyle/celebrity-life/things-about-meghan-we-dont-know-documentary-allegedly-exposes-duchess-of-sussexs-colourful-life-before-harry/news-story/298cdb889224c84ce8377430e72f1910

[hasellia]

Okay apologies for hopping on tag trending train but I have an important request.

If you don't know about the history of Aboriginal genocide in Australia, watch this program.

It's a very very hard watch but one that is important.

If you're outside of Australia, make sure to set your VPN to Aus. You may also need to set an acount for SBS but it's free viewing.

I would also recomend most of SBS's docos through NITV, as they're the National Indigenous broadcast station.

A little update on the warnings before I forget. I'm a little pressed for time so this is from my DM's with someone I've shared with.

I just wanted to give a heads up that the show contains footage of a mourning ceremony (with the grievers's permission from what I remember). There is also a segment where stolen remains are returned to their families but there is no appearence of the remains themselves on screen. From what I can tell/remember these scenes are treated with care and gravitas but I don't think I can be the one to say whether they were treated appropriately. Anything on colonialism is a hard watch, but this doco particularly follows on the unglamourised brutality of the frontier wars as well the lack of recognition on the wars from the Australian government/military and from the wider Australian public. That's on me for not disclosing that properly in the post.