#but boils down to cishet
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
Note
YOU'RE CISHET??!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
anon im so sorry you had to find out like this.
#ask!!#anon ask!!#its like. cisgender het leaning aromantic asexual biaesthetic (not sure if that last one is an actual thing but im making it one)#but boils down to cishet
5 notes
·
View notes
Note
Hi, can you maybe explain more about your tags under the armand + malik gifset? What Do you mean when you talk about armands gender and she/her pronouns? I'm in my late 30s and english is not my native language and I have trouble understanding what people mean when they say stuff like that, like lestat beeing she/her coded. And you seem to get it. Hope thats not a bother and thanks!
Hi! So basically I can only speak for myself here, and obviously if anyone else is reading this and has some throughts to add, feel free to.
I myself am nonbinary; genderfluid to be more precise. Also, I don't think I've ever tried to spell out what I'm about to attempt to, so bare with me.
I think this is mainly a thing among queer and genderqueer people, where we have this, almost an ability, to sense that there's something non-cishet happening? It's those fine little details that give you a sense of where someone's gender expression is at, at a certain moment.
It might seem crazy to someone who reads about this for the first time.. And obviously, I'm by no means making any assumption about the actors themselves, I'm saying this purely looking at the moments we see acted onscreen in character. And perhaps a lot of the times there's a level of projecting from our side when we say things like that - but it goes a bit hand in hand, because we simply recognize those traits and behaviours we're familiar with in ourselves and our friends. And the fact that it's the same moments - both for Lestat and Armand - where there's a lot of people noticing it and making those she/her, babygirl, Mother etc. comments individually, separatelly, on their own en masse sensing the same thing... that suggests to me that there's probably something true about all this :P
But yeah, generally speaking, it's difficult to describe what in particular it is that has us going "what I'm looking at is very she-coded (or he-/ they- coded)"... Whether it's something delicate about the movement of a wrist, or a melody in their voice, or the tilt of their head as they smile that you never see in a cis man... Maybe I'm actually touching on something here - maybe it's those small movements you know you almost never see in some people, but very often in others - and we're just more attuned to noticing them and registering them as transcending the usual cis behaviour
I went to put this in tags but maybe it's a good summary: generally speaking it boils down to "this character makes some choices and those choices are not ones you often see made by *insert their generally assumed identity*"
#ask#armand#lestat#my-post#text#I'll maybe realise there's some other things that should have been said after I've thought on this more#but for now - this is what I can say on the matter :)#also reminds me how early in s2 a lot of people were calling loumand lesbians - so one could get even more complex and bring relationship#dynamics and behaviours into the discussion#but generally speaking it boils down to "this character makes some choices#and those choices are not ones you often see made by *insert their generally assumed identity*#&Let me tell you Shows like this are like honey for soul to watch when you get to see your faves floating back&forth over gender boundaries#bless vampirism and the “I'm hundreds of years old of course I'm not cishet” vibe they bring
7 notes
·
View notes
Text
after staring longingly at the post every time it crossed my dash i finally watched to wong foo thanks for everything. it's really good! i honestly don't know what i could say that hasn't been said before wrt drag in the movie. also, obviously as a comedy it's sometimes poking fun, but as a trans person who grew up in a semi-rural area, it's pretty dead on there too. extremely funny to see a group of redneck townie boys being ruthlessly satirized in a 30 year old comedy and they are literally visually identical to guys i went to high school with.
#the only real point of criticism i can think of is just the kind of usual conflation of drag with transness#and i think that's sometimes fair but you have to keep in mind the intent of the work (in this case positive)#and that our communities were and are very much intertwined#for almost every movie like this my opinion boils down to xyz cishet man playing a trans woman did an objectively good job#but if it were made today i think it'd be better to cast a trans woman#mostly i just want to see one all trans movie remake that is incredibly camp. well ideally i want a stage play. but a movie will do.
0 notes
Text
im going to McFuckin'g lose it i need to meet and hang out with queer people i can't stand being surrounded with cishet people anymore i'm going to Scream
#literally every conversation if it goes on long enough will eventually lead down to negative comments about queer people#or just shitting on cishet people for not being cishet enough 'bc you can never know these days'#im just boiling with rage in my head bc im shit at arguing bc i get too angry too fast to be able to get more rational response#or i just don't join the conversation bc i know there's no way to explain to them nicely under a minute when i'm busy with work#every time i think at least irl people i care about arent as cruel and stupid. they just say even dumber shit unprovoked#no you didn't have your brain rotten less from internet than SWJs that yell hashtag cancelled at the stupidest commercial#that nobody takes serious anyway and knows its just a bait for outrage to get their brand better known#you're just as brain broken (and worse) for seeing a person with 'bigger bones' and thinking oh she's definitely a man#a real woman doesn't look like that#or vice versa this man is too feminine to be a real man#you stupid bitch im queer do you think the same of me then?!???#im so tempted to out myself but its still a bad time to do it now that i finally have a good job#living in the middle of vukojebina doesn't help At All#just smile and wave. you're witnessing mental illness
0 notes
Text
Really interested in the history of kink at pride but I'm not totally sure where to start reading about that or what to look for
#I saw someone post about the historical context & the connection to transmisogyny recently#found it simultaneously horrifying and interesting because I've never actually seen this talked about in depth before?#I'm so used to people boiling this issue down to kinksters fucking in public or something else absurd#or cishets trying to act like it makes them lgbt#it's really disappointing that something that's far more complex has been so grossly oversimplified#and had it's dark history swept under the rug#Granted I can't say I'm shocked because when I first started seeing this be talked about was when I was an idiot child#surrounded by other idiot children who had literally no idea what they were talking about#or people who were speaking from a place of trauma which I can completely empathize with!#but for me personally I need to look deeper and I actually genuinely want to learn#there's plenty of silly things I've learned through my teens that I'm trying to unlearn
0 notes
Text
Lmaooo shudder deleted my review of a wounded fawn PUSSIES! COWARDS! I was Right and they know it
#it boiled down to ‘maybe if you’re making a female revenge flick you should let a woman at least proof read your script’#an all too common trend these days for cishet dudes to make ‘female empowerment’ horror allllll by themselves#and we can tell cuz it’s bad#could’ve been really good! but you flubbed it bro#FACE THE TRUTH
1 note
·
View note
Note
There is something confusing to me about older queer people (which is to say, older than I am, at a relatively young 24 years old) who get mad at original fiction whose worldbuilding involves neopronouns. I'm hoping maybe, ONTF, since you've been in queer spaces a lot longer than I have, you can explain why people have such a negative reaction to the idea.
Basically, I'm working on a novel based that takes white-throated sparrow biology and uses it for building blocks in the same way A/B/O takes (now debunked) wolf science and used it for building blocks. This means there are essentially four genders, the two viewed as more intelligent (brown-haired men and women) and the two viewed as more physical (white-haired men and women). Those two groups then get further divided along the lines of 'women are better at making smart decisions under pressure' and 'men are better at staying home and defending the children, as God intended'.
So it seemed natural to me that this worldwide quaternary system would result in at least some languages having pronoun sets for each of the four options. Some languages in real life have more complicated pronoun systems than that, particularly ones where there's a bunch of formal and informal pronouns. It'd also help the reader keep track of who was a part of what group without my having to turn around and state people's coloration constantly. Yes, these people are human, just as humans in A/B/O are, but society is fundamentally very different. I'm not throwing this in to just complicate things or sound smart or something. It's here because my minoring in Anthropology and majoring in Linguistics taught me language usage reflects the needs and values of a people.
The writing group I'm a part of IRL is mostly queer, mostly 40+, with some cishet women who are also present and active writers. The writing group I'm a part of on DW is mostly DWRPers, in their 30's and up, though no older than 50, and entirely queer. I did not expect these to be groups that were uncomfortable with the idea of "different world, different pronouns".
Instead the reception has ranged from suggestions it's pretentious or overthinking things to requests I reconsider doing it. I've been informed this could be seen as mocking the real life queer people who go by pronouns other than she, he, or they. One person asked if this was went to be me "artificially justifying" nonbinary pronouns and implying I didn't find them valid in the real world. That was an awkward conversation, to say the least.
In reality I wasn't really thinking about real life people who use nonbinary pronouns when I was writing. I was just asking, "Logically, wouldn't it make sense for things to work very differently under a quarternary than it does under a modern European binary?" and following my brain along to its' conclusions as it processed that.
I have gotten zero negative feedback from my queer friends my age regarding this. So obviously, generation and the experiences informing a generational context are key, here. I'm just... still lost on how anyone finds this objectionable.
Help?
--
Ahaha. Oh god.
Well, as a reader of sff in the 90s, the first reaction I have to such things is "IS THERE A CONLANG AND A MAP?" Because, man, the conlang people were some of the most tedious motherfuckers I ever had to deal with in sff spaces.
But broadly... I think the reasons queer people get annoyed about this stuff boil down to a couple of big factors:
Disrespectful children who don't know history
Idiot old people harrumphing about "history" they clearly failed to pay attention to while it was going on in the first place
I personally hate being asked to use new words most of the time. A few bits of fandom slang I'll pick up at once, but I'm usually like "Why would I call it 'spirk'? We already have 'K/S'!" *shakes cane*
If you're American, they're your "roommate", not your "flatmate". No, I don't care how much more precise this foreign term is, you pretentious wanker. (But then I'll use 'wanker' because fandom adopted that years ago...)
So my reaction to being asked to say aloud any pronoun not in very frequent circulation in my offline life is "Urrrgh. Do I have to?"
However, the reality is that people have been messing around with pronouns in English since forever. Do you see 'heo' in Modern English? No, you do not! (Not that it was gender neutral, but the point is that even words as ancient as pronouns have changed quite a bit.) The early internet was full of pronoun stuff in MUDs and the like. You had a choice of a lot more than just three in a bunch of these. People besides men and women have always been in queer communities.
So some people like to cry about neopronouns being actually neo, and they're just wrong.
As for the why do you care part...
There is a nasty habit in contemporary queer spaces to act like gay rights issues are solved. Bisexuality? Passe! etc. Gays and lesbians finally got a little mainstream acceptance only to suddenly be treated like the worst of the establishment by the queer youth. How dare?!?! It's even more egregious with bisexuality where the focus of a bunch of queer activism finally swung that way in the 90s... only to be sharply cut off in the 00s.
There's a real "You already got yours. Where's mine?" vibe to some queer discourse today, and it's directed at people who never got theirs. It shows up in demands for mentorship by people who've barely had a chance to escape a rocky start and figure out who they are themselves. It shows up in yowling about this or that bit of queer media we finally got not being progressive because it's the wrong letter of the acronym.
None of which has a damn thing to do with what pronouns you use in your novel, obviously, but I think some unresolved embattled feelings are why some older queer people are very weird about pronouns.
Some of them are also doing the old person version of throwing the weirdos under the bus to placate the normies. Respectability politics became a term long before the behavior was rife on tumblr.
--
If someone really does find it pretentious, though, and not just as a cover for crying about nonbinary identities being fake, I suspect they just remember how 1970s SFF was full of privileged anthropology students misunderstanding kinship systems from elsewhere in the world and then trying to tell everyone how ~deep~ their extremely contrived novels based on them were.
I'm not saying your writing is like this or that every one of these old sff novels was either, but when I hear "anthropology student", I groan internally. It's an instinctive reaction. It's less about the real fields and more about the bevvy of dilettantes I've run into over the years who'll say they study those things but really want to talk my ear off about Joseph fucking Campbell or the strong form of the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis or something.
--
Those birds are a really cool source of inspiration. Like with A/B/O, the first thing I wonder is how queerness works in that context and how much people like to defy their designated roles.
Omegaverse started on porn logic, so "The one I say tops always tops!" makes sense. When it gets expanded to try to make it make logical sense as a whole world, I often enjoy it, but it can break down quickly if treated as biology is law. I don't know how often the birds veer off of their set patterns, but humans certainly would.
One place where I get a strong "Oh god, this again" feeling from people's plotbunnies is when they're trying to make up a sff society that strikes me as too rigid in a way that real humans aren't. I'll see people using fake wolf biology (not just for horny reasons) but never looking at what's going on with gender in contemporary Thailand or whatever. Like... Le Guin may have made sedoretus feel plausible, but nobody I've ever seen stanning the concept as something fandom should play with has. That's probably because Le Guin was using over-complicated social norms as a thing that breaks down and causes trouble, and "This should be the next A/B/O!" posts are treating it as something that actually works and is a good way to get the pair you don't ship separated while shipping poly.
"It'd also help the reader keep track of who was a part of what group without my having to turn around and state people's coloration constantly."
This, in particular, gives me that cold shudder of recognition from when Homestuck fandom was everywhere and everyone wanted to over-explain those stupid playing card suits and why I should care.
Your concept sounds neat, and I think a set of four pronouns could easily make sense there...
But I also think that if people need the pronouns to keep track of coloration, you haven't set up a system that feels organic enough or haven't given enough cues about how characters are treating each other or why. Use the pronouns too, but just keep that in mind. It's like the "m/m is hard because the pronouns don't tell me whose hand is where" problem. It's almost never actually a pronoun problem.
--
Anyone else have thoughts here?
111 notes
·
View notes
Text
Fandom Problem #5251:
Begging people to understand that queerbaiting is a marketing tactic for fiction in which the writers hint at queer identities or storylines without actually depicting them.
A real person can't be an example of queerbaiting. Every queerbaiting accusation directed at a real person always boils down to, "I assumed this person is queer because they meet some totally-not-homophobic stereotypes I believe about queer people, but they didn't confirm my suspicions by publicly announcing their identity, which means that they're actually queerbaiting!!!"
Some people are closeted. Some people simply don't feel the need to share that part of themselves with everyone. And maybe there are some people out there who really are cishet but "act queer" (whatever the fuck that means), but in that case it's your responsibility to consider why you made assumptions about their identity in the first place.
Kit Connor, a real person, wasn't queerbaiting by acting in Heartstopper without first writing "I AM BI" on his forehead in permanent marker. Taylor Swift, a real person, isn't queerbaiting by... Being straight while having songs that weirdos on the internet decided must be secretly coded gay songs?
Can we all just... Mind our own business and not force strangers to out themselves? You're not protecting the queer community, you're just making the world more dangerous for closeted people.
128 notes
·
View notes
Text
TW: CNC, Gun kink, Threat of Death, Fear kink, Gaslighting kink.
MINORS/CISHET DNI
Decided to try some longer form writing. Let me know what you think! If you like it, maybe I’ll write other things 🤷🏼
Contains: BDSM, cnc, fear kink, threat of death, bondage, gaslighting kink, gun kink, handjob, forced orgasm, mind break, ftm sub, NB dom, gender neutral, t4t, little bit of worship kink, praise, degradation, sort of choking
Language used: they, he, him, cunt, pussy, asshole, clit/(t)dick, clit/(t)cock, slut, pathetic, baby, good boy, my pet, partner, (i was specifically vague about the wording around what actions were being done to the clit/(t)cock or dick because then it’s applies to whatever you’d like to imagine or if you are maybe post surgery or using tools, etc.)
“Want to play Russian roulette?” Your partner says smoothly while running their fingertips down your naked back. You’re tied to the bed frame, on your stomach, legs and arms trapped in the harnesses you keep there. You yank your head up and try to look at them behind you. They are standing between your legs now, off the bed, where you can’t see them.
“Russian roulette?” You ask, confused. “Like, the gun game?”
You hear your partner moving around. “Yeah. But sexy.” They reply playfully.
Your throat gets thick at the way their voice sounds. “Oh, so like an empty gun?” You ask, lowering your head back to the pillow
You hear a few clicking noises you can’t place at first. Until the clicking stops after only 5 clicks, and is followed by the sound of a revolver spinning. “No, real Russian roulette” your partner responds and you whip your head back up.
You feel the bed sink slightly. Something cold and metallic presses up against your pussy. You make a choked garble as you instinctively yank on your bindings, and arch your back, trying to get away from the metal pushing into you.
“The only difference,” your partner continues casually, their voice dripping like warm chocolate “is that I’m not holding the gun against your head.”
The gun clicks.
You scream, your body spasming in a frantic, feral attempt to escape. You’re sobbing already, before you realize you’re still alive and unharmed. Your partner is slowly pushing the gun into your now dripping cunt.
“What the fuck!” You shout when you compose yourself a little bit. You pull, HARD on the wrist cuffs and try to get them off.
“What baby?” They purr, the trigger guard pressing into your clit/(t)dick now. The gun bottoms out in you, and they start pulling it back out at the same, agonizingly slow pace.
“Stop! Let me out!” You practically shout, the anger in you boiling now. You can’t believe they would do that, even as a joke. “Right now!” You pause the tugging and look over your shoulder expecting to see them pulling away from you.
They aren’t.
The gun clicks again.
Your vision blacks out for a second. You might have screamed, you don’t know. Your throat is dry and crackling. This time tears aren’t the thing that pulls you back. This time it’s your partner fucking you, hard and fast. With the gun.
A moan rips from your lips before you can stop it. You can hear how wet you are. The gun slides easily in and out of your soaked pussy. The trigger guard slamming into your clit/(t)dick with each downward thrust. The pain and pleasure pushes another moan out of you.
“I don’t think you really want me to let you out.” Your partner teases. They thrust in, extra hard that time. You exhale heavily at the force.
You start to whine back a response when the gun clicks again. And then again.
You repeat a combination of both previous reactions, black passes over your brain for a moment as you scream. The scream devolves into heaving sobs.
“Four” your partner states. Their voice sounding cold now. You open your eyes and realize the lamp that had been on, is now off. The room is pitch black. All you can think about, all you can feel, the only sensation as it takes over your mind is the gun, slamming now, in and out of your drenched, sloppy cunt.
You feel the edge starting to rise up in front of you. That slow pressure deep in the pit of you. You can feel it building. Rising up with each pound in and out. In and out. You’re screaming and crying and begging. Incoherent and desperate. You aren’t sure when you started moaning in between cries, but you are now.
The gun clicks.
You blackout fully this time. Just for one moment. The world stops. A split second later you’re back and your partner is laughing callously.
“Five.” They chuckle. “You slut! You wouldn’t believe how tight you got that time.” They slow down the pumping, but don’t stop. They start doing long slow pulls. All the way out, not even the tip in. Then all the way back in and grinding the trigger guard against your clit/(t)cock.
You’re moaning unabashedly now, tears and drool and snot running down your face, the pillow a mess. “Pl-“ you try to say, “please”
“Please what, baby?” Your partner feigns concern. “Do you want me to stop?” They ask. You whine and squirm in response. You honestly don’t know even know which you are answering with, yes or no.
“I’m not going to stop.” They state, the faked concern turning to cruelty. “I’m going to fuck you, with this loaded gun, until you cum all over it like the pathetic cockslut you are.” They slam the gun in and out two times, punctuating their sentence. Then they stop. You feel the guns weight change as its handle twists in you and the whole thing falls down and out of you onto the bed. The bed shifts. Your partner walks around to look down at you.
You imagine what you must look like. Tear stained, snot and saliva mixed in your hair. You think about how wet and messy your cunt is. How desperate you look. You feel like a pathetic cockslut. You look up at them in the darkness. Your eyes have adjusted apparently. They stand, illuminated by the moonlight from your bedroom window.
Even in this moment. In this terrible, terrifying, embarrassing moment. Even in this moment, they are radiance. You look up at them in awe. You feel a fresh rush of fluids in your already drenched pussy. Your chest tightens in symmetry as their jaw tightens, while they gaze out the window at the moon.
They turn to look back at you and lean down, eye to eye. Their beauty in this moment stuns and frightens you. The light filtering in from the window casts dark shadows at this angle.
“And while you’re cumming on this loaded gun that you begged me to take out of you.” They lean in close. You can feel their breath on your lips. Honey and spice. Sweet and dangerous. You can’t help but melt at their words, degrading as they were.
“I’m going to pull the trigger for number 6” they state. Their eyes locking yours. You try to look away but can’t.
The fear building in you now isn’t a screaming or crying or pleading type thing. It’s a cold, slow, ruthless frost, eating its way through your mind to your very soul. Devouring everything you’ve ever been, your life, your memories. This bone chilling fear.
Your partner chuckles darkly. “What a pretty look in your eyes.” They muse. “Ready?” They tease, cocking an eyebrow.
You squeeze your eyes shut and push your face into the pillow. You push down the desire to react, again. You let the frost burn away that anger. You focus only on one thing.
You can not cum.
No matter what you want, or feel or think, you cannot allow yourself to cum. Don’t think about the gun that’s now slowly starting to move in and out of your desperate cunt. Don’t think about the smooth honey-spice taste of your partners lips. Don’t think about their lips on your clit/(t)cock, or their eyes looking up at you from that position. Don’t think about anything.
Just. Don’t. Cum.
You feel their long, attentive fingers around your clit/(t)dick. The gun is thrusting in and out, quickly but long and deep. They turned the handle so the trigger guard digs into your asshole every time now instead. You honestly don’t mind it that much. The stimulation feels kind of nice there.
Focus
Your partners fingers play you like a well loved instrument. It’s only moments before your can feel the edge building again.
“No, no, nonono, noooooo” you try to beg but the “nos” quickly turn into coos.
“Come on, baby.” Your partner purrs again. “Don’t you want to cum? It would feel so good.” They goad.
“Please.” You whimper. The edge looms over you. The darkness and the gun, the trigger guard and their fingers are all you think about. All you can focus on.
I’m going to die
Is the last thought you have before the wall breaks in front of you and you’re screaming.
“Six.” Your partner growls.
The gun clicks for the 6th time.
You’re cumming and screaming and crying. Your body is writhing on the bed. You can’t feel anything but you can also feel everything. You don’t know what’s real and what isn’t. Your pussy spasms violently as another wave crests over you. Your partners fingers still working your clit/(t)cock. You feel alive. You feel dead.
“Good boy.” You hear and cling to that one spot of reality. It’s your anchor. You heard them. That was real. That was alive. That was living.
Your throat was raw, and another sob ripped through it. “Please.” You said, broken up into heaves. You start feeling real again.
You’re dazed and half conscious as your partner undoes the bindings holding you in place. You curl up into a tight ball. They shuffle around, doing something for a few moments before crawling into the bed next to you. They hum lightly while draping a light, soft blanket over the both of you.
“You did so good for me, baby.” They coo gently. Their arms wrap around you, pulling you tight against their warm body. You barely flinch as they unroll you and push you to face away from them.
A moment later you’re tight against their body, half conscious, your head resting on their right arm, their left draped around you in front of them. They whisper sweet praise in your ear.
“There were never any bullets in the gun?” You ask dreamily.
“No, love.” They respond, nuzzling their face into your neck, giving you soft kisses and nips.
Their left hand makes its way down to your swollen, sore clit/(t)dick. You buck against them, the sensation overwhelming. They bring their right forearm up against your throat, holding you in place.
“Please.” You beg, their grip stopping you from moving more than a few inches. Their fingers dance along with you as you squirm.
“I want to make you feel good.” Their honey-spice breath washing against your ear and cheek. “You were such a good boy and I want to reward my pet when he’s a good boy.”
You can’t help but moan and grind back against his fingers.
Good boy
My pet
Their fingers speed up and soon you’re writhing against their body, their arm still locked around your throat. Your clit/(t)cock throbbing and begging for release.
“Cum for me, my pet.” They say in a way that makes it feel like they are asking for the most beautiful jewel they had ever seen. “Be my good boy.”
And fireworks.
#gun kink#ftm cnc#ftm sex#ftm nsft#ftm switch#ftm ns/fw#nb daddy#nb nsft#nblnb nsft#nblm nsft#t4t nblnb#nb dom#nblm#t4t bottom#t4t nsft#free use nsft#free use cnc#cnc fr33use#fr33use#ftm t4t#gun k!nk#fear kink#fear k!nk#queer bd/sm#queer nsft#t4t ns/fw#t4t sub#t4t kink#cnc k!nk#cnc free use
198 notes
·
View notes
Note
Youve said in the past you don't think Dean would do well with AA. Could you expand on what you mean by that?
well. the first problem with AA is that it has an all or nothing approach. either you're fully sober or you've gone off the deep end. and that's not realistic or helpful for everybody. i don't think dean needs full sobriety to be okay. what he needs is to not fall back on alcohol as a coping mechanism when he's deep in the pits of despair. the AA program doesn't allow for that kind of nuance.
equally important is the fact that AA is geared towards a very specific type of person: a cishet, white, man who isn't living in the world of a fantasy genre show. have you ever looked at the twelve steps? i'm assuming the average person hasn't, or if they have, their eyes just sort of glaze over when reading them because they're vague and repetitive and sound like nonsense. but what they essentially boil down to is this:
accepting a higher power (aka god) and handing over control to them
admitting every awful thing you believe about yourself and accepting that those things are the truth
admitting that you are the architect of all of your problems
admitting that you are the one who has done harm to the world and those around you (and no harm done to you is an excuse for anything ever)
making yourself as vulnerable as possible
this sounds like a cheat sheet for exacerbating every problem dean winchester has. this is a person who has been fighting for control his entire life, who already hates himself and thinks he's to blame for things that he couldn't possibly be responsible for, etc.
these steps make my skin crawl and i've never been singled out by god or his army. there's just no way dean winchester sits through a single meeting and comes out better for it.
238 notes
·
View notes
Text
okok i saw someone talk about how they dont like zolu (which if u dont idc) but it came down to a mass mischaracterization of zoro, luffy, and sanji so i wanted to talk about it
note that the person i saw was a zosan shipper but im not at all saying zolu is better than zosan or that zosan sucks (also sorry if this comes off rude im autistic LOL)
"zolu doesnt work because luffy is aro ace!"
im aspec, but you guys need to realize asexuality and aromanticism is a spectrum. for example: someone whos demisexual would only have romantic/sexual feelings if they already have a close bond with that person. using luffys aromanticism as an excuse to why zolu doesnt work is. weird. aspec people already dont get a lot of rep, but boiling it down to one definition isnt what we are
"if you ship zolu its because of the one piece live action! they straight washed sanji!"
ok this one kind of pissed me off bc😭..... none of the strawhats are canonically queer. you can def hc someone as gay, bi, lesbian, etc. but until oda says something is canon it isnt. for example, i hc zoro as gay and sanji as bi! but neither of these are canon. sanji wasnt straight washed, his characterization is very similar to the animanga, same as the other characters. the only real difference is they toned down a lot of things they werent able to do bc its not animation
"it feels cishet female gaze-y!"
zolu, arguably, has one of the most complex dynamics in the show. zoro has completely dedicated himself to luffy and luffy has pushed him to accomplish his dream. zoro sacrificed himself in thriller bark, giving up his dream, and promise to kuina, and nearly died in the process. zoros unwavering loyalty in luffy and luffys unwavering trust in zoro is part of the main appeal. im not a cishet female, so its probably why most of this got me upset, but i myself hc them both as aspec, and that they arent very sexual people. i wouldnt necessarily call either "female gaze-y" since the male gaze is a product of the patriarchy and the female gaze is more in a "how does this man treat a woman" way but yeah.
if u disagree w me thats ok! u can block me or send me an ask explaining why u prefer zoro and sanjis dynamic! its just not for me! i just think throwing around baseless accusations like straight washing or fetishization is weird
ok bye sorry
#one piece#monkey d luffy#one piece strawhats#straw hat luffy#straw hat crew#monkey d. luffy#straw hat pirates#roronoa zoro#luffy#pirate hunter zoro#zolu
139 notes
·
View notes
Text
I genuinely don't care who you see as queer or not in spn bc when you boil it down none of those guys are queer and spn is the cishet men with guns kill people show but there is something silly and whimsical 2 me about people insisting Gabriel gives derogatory straight man vibes and then simultaneously treating Dean Winchester like the epitome of queer representation.
#they're both written with uuuh. very similar misogynistic straight man ideals of sexuality#cw fandom wank
30 notes
·
View notes
Note
The discourse around "theyfab" as a term always boils down to "hey this is a deeply transphobic and exorsexist term that boils people down to their agab and binarizes nonbinary people, the fact there's transmisogynistic nonbinary people isn't an excuse to use slurs and invalidate people's Identities" vs. "I'm literally the most oppressed which means I'm categorically incapable of harm and it's honestly pretty transmisogynistic you don't let me get away with saying anything I want without criticism."
God forbid someone tell them they can criticize people's behaviors without calling them slurs or implying their agab and gender make them uniquely predisposed to being Bad People tm
it's why I've said we should make fun of cishet people less because it used to be fine but we've since slid down the slippery slope into a bullshit fantasy land where trans men and non-binary people are oppressors too, like we fucked it up, we had a great thing going with the Down With Cis bus but we proved incapable of handling the responsibility that comes with working out groups you're allowed to be mean to, maybe if we're on our best behavior we can earn it again in five years
36 notes
·
View notes
Text
Okay me angy here I go getting riled up again! If I see any more pisscourse about ace/aro not being part of the queer community, queer is a slur, men are inherently evil monsters, I’m just gonna assume you’re a TERF. Ace discourse back in the 10’s is exactly how TERFs started their rise to power.
Start out by drawing a line in the sand that (awful) people agree with. Now there’s proof that you can start boxing in certain identities. That means (general) you can start making specific definitions for things.
Queer is now a slur again. Queer actually hasn’t been reclaimed. People agree with that. You’ve just torn down an umbrella identity that everyone was able to gather under and unite behind.
LGBTQIA+ is actually the Correct Way to talk about the queer community. Actually we need to drop QIA+ because queer is a slur, intersex isn’t a sexuality/gender and is just a weird medical condition, and A stands for allies (instead of aro/ace bc we already decided that they aren’t part of the community) and we don’t want those sick CisHets infiltrating our community.
LGBT is now the proper accepted term. That means you must be Gay Lesbian Bisexual and/or Transgender to be part of the community. If you aren’t doing LGBT correctly then you are trying to infiltrate the community and steal resources (and those resources are never defined). Only LGBT people are safe.
Oh, except bisexuals. They’re dirty cheaters bc they get to pass as straight and thus aren’t Oppressed Enough like us Pure Gays. How dare they be into men. Only Good Gays get to be into men. If a lesbian ever thought about a man in any vague romantic/sexual way then they are Impure. Men are the true evil of the world bc patriarchy. The only type of man you’ll be safe with is a gay man bc they don’t want to SA you when they see your shoulders/ankles.
All men are the root of all evil, except our good example gay men, who coincidentally are usually white and follow the good gay stereotypes, which are feminine in nature. Femininity is Good and Safe. You can trust anyone who is Feminine, and you can distrust anyone who is Masculine. Men only exist to take advantage of women. Women must be protected at all costs.
Wait. We allow transgender people in the community. That means either a Dirty Evil Man is cosplaying as a woman, or a Pure Innocent Girl got taken in by the evils of masculinity and patriarchy. Trans people are bad since they are being taken over by Evil Men, and/or trying to infiltrate the community, which we already decided is bad. Trans people aren’t Pure. The T in LGBT gets dropped.
Also if you’re nonbinary someone pulled the wool over your eyes. It’s just a phase and you’ll fall into Woman Lite soon enough. There’s no such thing as an amab nonbinary person. Men are evil, and nonbinary is Woman Lite. If you dress in any way that’s not feminine or androgynous then you are doing it wrong.
Congrats, you are now a TERF.
And before you say “that’s not what happened!” I saw every single one of these talking points come out in real time. It was slow. It wasn’t sudden. It was pushing the boundary little by little until you boiled the frog. And now with acecourse coming up again I can all but guarantee that this cycle will happen again. So! Some things to look out for and deprogram.
All men are not inherently evil. All women are not inherently good. Masculinity isn’t inherently evil. Femininity isn’t inherently good. Queer is not a slur and is an extremely useful umbrella term for those who don’t know which label they fit under, or who don’t want a specific label. Yes, queer can still be used as a slur (I have been called queer in a derogatory way) but it is one the community has reclaimed. Trans people aren’t trying to trick you. Amab nonbinary people aren’t “lesser” than afab nonbinary people. Nonbinary is not Woman Lite. There is no such thing as a morally pure sexuality. The queer community is welcome for all who identify as queer; yes, even that person. Policing and oppression olympics is not a litmus test for “pure enough” for joining the queer community. The queer community is for Everyone. That’s it. That’s all.
58 notes
·
View notes
Text
Can I just rant a little bit about how weird it is that powerscalers make up a good chuck if not the majority of the One Piece fandom? Like, obligatory consume media however the fuck you want, I'm not your dad, this is just my silly little opinion.
To start off, One Piece has always put more stock into the world building and political systems than the power systems, which very much (to me at least) feels very vibes based. Like, there is a structured nature to them, but one that Oda has no qualms with bending or breaking for the sake of the story. The world building/political systems on the other hand, are very fleshed out. This series regularly tackles issues of slavery, oppression, genocide. Of government misinformation and corruption and how that effects the people of the One Piece world. And it does so well! Yet time and time again the main conversation I see boils down to who can punch harder, and do said punching in the coolest, most badass way.
And I think this is why Gear 5 was so controversial when in first debuted. It did not fit into the powerscaling system that had been developed, it being the amine/manga equivalent of Looney Tunes. And it did not fit the typical rage filled final form that has become standard in Shonen. It didn't matter how thematically relevant that Luffy's final form was joy incarnate, that it represented the themes of freedom that the series had been building up for its decades of run time. It was not stereotypically terrifying and powerful in a way that the cishet male viewer could project onto in a power fantasy type of way. It's silly and goofy and designed to make the viewer laugh along with Luffy as he pulls off these insane stunts (like turning Kaido into a jump rope). It's not really meant to be powerscaled or viewed as a power fantasy, its meant to the the antithesis of the oppressive regime of the world government, and a beacon of hope for the oppressed.
#one piece#one piece meta#gear five#i could also talk about how gear 5 IS terrifying in its own right#like you mean to tell me that being flattened like a pancake#while hearing maniacal laughter from the person doing it#is not fucking TERRIFYING#gear 5 is on some eldritch horror bullshit#but that's a whole other rabbit hole
31 notes
·
View notes
Note
seen too many proship dni bitches complain about BL normalizing SA/incest and I’m just like
why does queer fiction written by queer people do that but not bodice rippers or idk Colleen Hoover’s books? Or any other popular books written by c1s/straight people?
(nothing against Colleen Hoover, I don’t read her works because of their nature but like… I’ve seen so many copies in the book store and no one complained about it normalizing anything, yet queer fiction does)
It's like they put queer people on a pedestal and then blame us for how bigots treat us. Like the amount of times I've seen "You're the reason we have a bad name" and it's some queer person shipping incest in their little fandom corner. Really?? No one was queerphobic before fandom incest shippers?? The reason people want to kill us is because a queer person wrote about fictional SA? And they always say "Uhm, acktually, cishet people get treated badly for creating incest and SA too" Oh yeah, I forgot how y'all run George R.R. Martin through the mud for his incestuous stories...oh...wait....Game of Thrones is insanely fucking popular and I have NEVER seen an anti drag GRRM through the mud like they do to queer people. And obviously, I'm not saying GRRM SHOULD be harassed or doxxed or anything like that. But it's like, why do y'all only have a problem when it's queer people shipping incest or writing about SA but not when cishet people do it?? Why don't y'all say how Game of Thrones normalizes incest? Like???
AND what ALSO pisses me off, is how they even tear apart wholesome queer fiction. Like y'all gotta problem with Killing Stalking for its SA and problematic shit, but you also want the creator of Boyfriends to die because his wholesome gay poly comic is a "little cringe". Antis don't like anything and they will use any excuse to tear down queer people, which is really sad, because a lot of antis are LGBTQ+ themselves. But they don't see how queerphobic and fascist they're being. They just ignore everything we say and are like "It's not homophobic to have a problem with incest, pedophilia (aka loli/shota), and SA" like bitch, no one said disliking that made you queerphobic. Shut up and listen to us, jfc. Sorry for the rant, but this shit gets my blood boiling.
10 notes
·
View notes