#anti-blackness in academia

[kimyoonmiauthor]

Literary theorists being AHs to women and PoCs

‘cause if I have to suffer, then you should also know how much of an AH these people are, so you can examine if their theories are even worth believing or if you SHOULD pay attention to their blind spots instead of saying it’s irrelevant to literary discussion. Personally, I think the fact they are unwilling to mention PoCs, particularly Black people and willing to actively dump on women is very relevant to current academic discourse. You can’t ignore Kant’s views on women, and see that the majority of the people who won in the end were people who showed hatred towards women.

Robert Scholes being an AH, Page 26-page 28 (Hilarious, but also homophobic and misogynistic) For context, EM Forster is gay, which makes this really homophobic.

Picture credit: https://www.brownalumnimagazine.com/articles/2017-03-03/memories-of-bob-scholes

‘Cause you see folks, the only decent writers in the world are men, cishet men. (notice the sharp sarcasm here).

E.M. Forster on Gertrude Stein (From Aspects of a Novel, a series of lectures he gave)

Credit: Getty Images https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/licensed-image?q=tbn:ANd9GcSjNW-FA-n5bkXFk2MFmMGMcBy1SJtQj185hrMceQN_8rK2L-6f2cu7Ct-PooBt8M6Mt7ffTDt5SPHpj00

https://www.gutenberg.org/cache/epub/70492/pg70492-images.html

Granted, a Modernist (and gay himself, openly so at the time he gave this lecture), but still, the dumping on Gertrude Stein seems to be a tradition that extends to other people afterwards (Rowe did it sideways, Lajos Egri, directly). Seriously? Dump on the lesbian Jew trying to encourage ways to describe TRAUMA. OMG, we shouldn’t talk about trauma.

But I disagree heartily--we have entire story structures devoted to dreams that play with sense of time and reality *because* of Gertrude Stein. I mean, how could you conceivably get Inception without Gertrude Stein’s theories of how to move language and time? Besides that, you have Dream Diaries (Japanese), Dream Record (First Chinese then Korean--not imported into Japan because there was a war), and then the whole of Dream Time from Aboriginals which predate her. Non-linear storytelling has and can work--but you need thematic plotting to be stronger and tone plotting to really be tight (pacing helps, but isn’t as critical as the other two). Thank the Modernists for the European white version. I mean, Magic realism, anyone???

If you want to find ways to break linear time and describe trauma itself, and the feeling of missing time--Modernists are your best bet to find techniques to get you there. (Kinda Post Modernists, though I resent the focus on readers a lot--I heartily disagree, BTW, that Structuralists and Post Modernists are the same thing... as argued in this paper here: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/B0080430767039516. 

Post Modernists tried to find further ways to break the rules and structure by bending to the reader. 

Structuralists tried to impose a bunch of rules and binary. Like say, the panopticon and prison system/School system. There’s rigidity everywhere with Structuralists and Eurocentricism.) Or as the Raw and Cooked put it, a binary of acceptable and unacceptable, when some cultures don’t work off the Bible. So I think this paper here: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/B0080430767039516

is more likely.

John Gardner, The Art of Fiction for Young Writers, published 1983

Picture credit: https://blog.bookstellyouwhy.com/john-gardner-and-the-art-of-fiction

No one is surprised that its all men mentioned, right? 

But what makes ignoramuses bad writers is not just their inexperience in fair argument. All great writing is in a sense imitation of great writing. Writing a novel, however innovative that novel may be, the writer struggles to achieve one specific large effect, what can only be called the effect we are used to getting from good novels. However weird the technique, whatever the novel’s mode, we say when we have finished it, “Now that is a novel!” We say it of Anna Karenina and of Under the Volcano, also of the mysteriously constructed Moby-Dick. If we say it of Samuel Beckett’s Watt or Malone Dies, of Italo Calvino’s The Baron in the Trees, or Kobo Abe’s The Ruined Map, we say it because, for all their surface oddity, those novels produce the familiar effect. It rarely happens, if it happens at all, that a writer can achieve effects much larger than the effects achieved in books he has read and admired. Human beings, like chimpanzees, can do very little without models. One may learn to love Shakespeare by reading him on one’s own—the ignoramus is unlikely to have done even this—but there is no substitute for being taken by the hand and guided line by line through Othello, Hamlet, or King Lear. This is the work of the university Shakespeare course, and even if the teacher is a person of limited intelligence and sensitivity, one can find in universities the critical books and articles most likely to be helpful, the books that have held up, and the best of the new books. Outside the university’s selective process, one hardly knows which way to turn. One ends up with some crank book on how Shakespeare was really an atheist, or a Communist, or a pen-name used by Francis Bacon. Outside the university it seems practically impossible to come to an understanding of Homer or Vergil, Chaucer or Dante, any of the great masters who, properly understood, provide the highest models yet achieved by our civilization. Whatever his genius, the writer unfamiliar with the highest effects possible is virtually doomed to search out lesser effects.

Gardner, John (2010-05-20T23:58:59.000). The Art of Fiction . Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group. Kindle Edition.

OMG, give this guy a prize, he managed to mention a Japanese man Kobo Abe. /s https://literariness.org/2019/04/15/analysis-of-kobo-abes-novels/ But then fails to mention the names of the authors of some of the novels he’s talking about (I’m literally begging Writer’s Digest, Knopf, etc to force these people to give better citations)

The closest he gets to noting a Black person is noting American Jazz on the page where Chapter 2 starts, and then fails to mention Jazz musicians. No, I’m serious. What makes a person an AH? The inability to mention a single work in 1983 by a female author?

Though the fact is not always obvious at a glance when we look at works of art very close to us in time, the artist’s primary unit of thought—his primary conscious or unconscious basis for selecting and organizing the details of his work—is genre. This is perhaps most obvious in the case of music. A composer writes an opera, a symphony, a concerto, a tone poem, a suite of country dances, a song cycle, a set of variations, or a stream-of-consciousness piece (a modern psychological adaptation of the tone poem). Whatever genre he chooses, and to some extent depending on which genre he chooses, he writes within, or slightly varies, traditional structures—sonata form, fugal structure, ABCBA melodic structure, and so forth; or he may create, on what he believes to be some firm basis, a new structure. He may cross genres, introducing country dances into a symphony or, say, constructing a string quartet on the principle of theme and variations. If he’s looking for novelty (seldom for any more noble reason), he may try to borrow structure from some other art, using film, theatrical movement, or something else. When new forms arise, as they do from time to time, they rise out of one of two processes, genre-crossing or the elevation of popular culture. Thus Ravel, Gershwin, Stravinsky, and many others blend classical tradition and American jazz—in this case simultaneously crossing genres and elevating the popular. Occasionally in music as in the other arts, elevating popular culture must be extended to mean recycling trash. Electronic music began in the observation that the beeps and boings that come out of radios, computers, and the like might sound a little like music if structure were imposed—rhythm and something like melody. Anything, in fact—as the Dadaists, Spike Jones, and John Cage pointed out—might be turned into something like music: the scream of a truck-tire, the noise of a windowshade, the bleating of a sheep.

Gardner, John (2010-05-20T23:58:59.000). The Art of Fiction . Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group. Kindle Edition.

Iunno, is it glaring to you? It’s glaring to me. Avoid talking about Black people challenge. I can name at least a few off the top of my head. Dizzy Gillespie? Billie Holiday? Ella Fitzgerald? And then he mentions white people before then? I’m groaning.

And that’s the thing, particularly about Black authors/Black people, they are either not mentioned by name, but their work is--WTF, or totally skipped, probably because the whole of Black literature goes against these white men’s structuralism, and postulations. On one hand, I’m glad they left them alone, but on the other, the saying this is the only way, while glaringly missing the obvious really is sickening.

As for dumping on women--well... should we go back to Aristotle being an ass and starting the whole anti-choice campaigns because somehow Aristotle is Jesus, even though Jesus didn’t say anything about Ensoulment at conception? And then indoctrinated white women trying to rescue Aristotle from taking the axe because all of his scientific ideas were wrong? (Just axe him--he was popular with the Victorians for a reason--he was a misogynistic asshole and that reinforced their worldview very well.) (And if you think I don’t have references for the anti-choice statement... oh wait for it... I so have it)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ensoulment Wikipedia, but I found scholarly articles too--not sure you want to be buried with that. Aristotle is not Jesus. !@#$ And Aristotle thought women got their soul later than men, because, as I said, royal asshole, to the point I want to do a whole long rant about how much of an irrelevant ah he was.

[fawnshifts]

me thinking of all the stuff me & my s/o are gonna do (I’m too shy to even look at pictures of him in THIS reality) 🎀

[livingmydreamlife5555]

When i get more MHA and shifting tiktoks after affirming that I'm already in my dr >>>>>>

But it doesn't matter cause I'm already in my dr. And my 3D reflects instantly all the time

[lawofthecycle]

𝐖𝐇𝐄𝐑𝐄 𝐈𝐒 𝐒𝐓𝐀𝐑𝐂𝐇𝐈𝐋𝐃?-𝐍𝐨𝐰 𝐥𝐨𝐚𝐝𝐢𝐧𝐠...

☆.。.:*・°☆.。.:*・°☆.。.:*・°☆.。.:*・°☆

𝐒𝐓𝐀𝐑𝐂𝐇𝐈𝐋𝐃 𝐈𝐒 𝐂𝐔𝐑𝐑𝐄𝐍𝐓𝐋𝐘…

𝐖𝐀𝐊𝐈𝐍𝐆 𝐔𝐏 𝐈𝐍 𝐌𝐘 𝐇𝐄𝐑𝐎 𝐀𝐂𝐀𝐃𝐄𝐌𝐈𝐀 𝐓𝐎𝐍𝐈𝐆𝐇𝐓!

GO SHIFT MY LOVES

[stargirl273]

Remus: *reading his book in the library*

Remus: *Hears soft classical music in the distance*

Regulus: *Reading a table next to him, having his earphones on full volume*

Remus: James, do you hear that to?

James: Oh, the classical music? That is reggie. He loves that kind of music

Remus: *Walks up to Regulus* What song is that?

Regulus: Oh, just Solas from Jamie Duffie. Don't think you know it.

Remus: *stares at him* That's my favorite classical song.

Regulus and Remus: *Dark academy fangirls squealing*

Sirius: *just walked in to the library* Is that my brother? And my boyfriend? Bonding?

[punkeropercyjackson]

Want to deeply drill into other adult Pjo fans' heads that Percy Jackson is a punk in the activist,anarchist and alternative subculture sense and not anybody's 'boytoy'.Younger Pjo fans don't have the self-righteous fake wokeist brainrot yet and i wanna keep it that way.Percy would never date,sleep with or want to be a god not because his story shouldn't be dark but because he's not a sellout or a poser.He listens to punk music,is politically and enviormentally active and is a complete and utter weirdo who dosen't fit in even amongst most other misfits.So he's punk.And dark Percy isn't nor has he ever been punk unless you mean darkskin Percy(which is just canon Percy).If you want to do something with Percy + dilfs so bad,then he can BE a dilf by pseudo-adopting Nico and Hazel even further than in canon.Believe it or not,not every queer guy is into incest or power fantasies-Not all of us are white(and Percy is afrolatino/african american/afrogreek).Read another book,'minors are fascists' squad

[hussyknee]

[flowersforfrancis]

I'll take that as a challenge.

[hazy-daydreamer]

Moodboard based on eri from my hero academia

Made by our fictive so is self indulgent

[etrnvl]

° . ˚ ⵌ ٠ ᭡ AERO is a hero in training attending U.A. High School. His quirk, air manipulation allows him to be able to control and manipulate air currents, creating powerful gusts, forming solid air barriers, and even generating small tornadoes. His control is so precise that he can use air to lift objects, deflect attacks, and enhance his mobility.

❝ Mizuki Hayate 美月 颯 ❞

Mizuki Hayate also known by is alias AERO

୨୧ Mizuki 美月 (meaning - beautiful moon)

୨୧ Hayate 颯 (meaning - swift wind)

୨୧ Birthday: Nov. 13

୨୧ Zodiac: Scorpio

୨୧ Mbti: ISTP

୨୧ Nationality: American

୨୧ Ethnicity: Ethiopian

୨୧ Languages: English, Japanese, Korean

[itscontinental]

VILE SERIES: "DARK"

[brandokisser]

(☆) Dark Academia Rudol von Stroheim stimboard.

req by: @v0mitgh0st

⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ 🇩🇪 🇩🇪 🇩🇪

⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ 🇩🇪 ♡. 🇩🇪

⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ 🇩🇪 🇩🇪 🇩🇪

[fawnshifts]

I don’t wanna be overpowered in my drs because the attention would overwhelm the hell outta me T_T I’ll take 2nd or 3rd place happily

˖ ֹ੭୧⊹ ࣪ ⑅

[livingmydreamlife5555]

LMAO just saw another YouTuber talking about shifting, and once again they get all their information on tiktok. @/edvasin or something like that. I watched some of his videos before, but I didn't expect him to make one about shifting.

But at the end of the day, they get all their info from TIKTOK, an unreliable source 🤷🏾‍♀️🤦🏾‍♀️. I don't even feel nervous or doubtful, and I didn't even get 10 minutes into it. Probably just some more bashing on shifting cause they get all their "research" from tiktok and they always talk about how everyone and their mama is shifting to hogwarts. It's too funny atp

Anyways, they'll probably never look here 🤣

[lawofthecycle]

★ ɪɴᴛʀᴏᴅᴜᴄɪɴɢ.ᴍʏ.ᴍʜᴀ.ᴅʀ ¡! ❞

ɴᴀᴍᴇ) ᴛᴀᴛʏᴀɴɴᴀ *ᴍᴇᴀɴꜱ ꜰᴀɪʀʏ Qᴜᴇᴇɴ ɪɴ ɢᴇʀᴍᴀɴ ɪ ᴛʜɪɴᴋ*

ᴀɢᴇ) ᴄᴀᴍᴇ ᴛᴏ ᴇᴀʀᴛʜ 16 ʏᴇᴀʀꜱ ᴀɢᴏ - ʀᴇᴀʟ ᴀɢᴇ ᴜɴᴄᴏɴꜰɪʀᴍᴇᴅ

ɢᴇɴᴅᴇʀ) ɴᴏɴ ᴄᴏɴꜰᴏʀᴍɪɴɢ *ɪ ᴅᴏɴ’ᴛ ʜᴀᴠᴇ ʏ ᴏʀ x ᴄʜʀᴏᴍᴏꜱᴏᴍᴇꜱ*

ʙᴀᴄᴋꜱᴛᴏʀʏ) ᴇxᴘᴇʀɪᴍᴇɴᴛ 0096 ɪꜱ ꜱᴀɪᴅ ᴛᴏ ʙᴇ ᴀ ꜱᴛᴀʀ ᴛʜᴀᴛ ᴅɪᴇᴅ ᴏᴠᴇʀ 13 ʙɪʟʟɪᴏɴ ʏᴇᴀʀꜱ ᴀɢᴏ. ᴅᴜʀɪɴɢ ᴛʜᴇ ꜱᴜᴘᴇʀɴᴏᴠᴀ ꜱᴛᴀɢᴇ ᴏꜰ ʜᴇʀ ʟɪꜰᴇ, ꜱʜᴇ ᴡᴀꜱ ꜱʜᴏᴛ ꜰʀᴏᴍ ᴛʜᴇ ᴄᴇɴᴛᴇʀ ᴏꜰ ʜᴇʀ ᴄᴏʀᴇ ᴀɴᴅ ꜱʟᴏᴡʟʏ ꜰᴇʟʟ ᴛᴏ ᴇᴀʀᴛʜ.

ᴅᴜʀɪɴɢ ᴛʜᴇ ʟᴏɴɢ ᴘᴇʀɪᴏᴅ ᴏꜰ ᴛɪᴍᴇ ꜱʜᴇ ᴡᴀꜱ ꜰᴀʟʟɪɴɢ ᴛᴏ ᴇᴀʀᴛʜ, ꜱʜᴇ ʙᴇᴄᴀᴍᴇ ꜱᴍᴀʟʟᴇʀ ᴀɴᴅ ꜱᴍᴀʟʟᴇʀ ᴜɴᴛɪʟ ꜱʜᴇ ʀᴇꜱᴇᴍʙʟᴇᴅ ᴀ 9 ᴘᴏᴜɴᴅ ꜰᴇᴛᴜꜱ. ɪᴛ ɪꜱ ʙᴇʟɪᴇᴠᴇᴅ ꜱʜᴇ ʙᴇᴄᴀᴍᴇ ꜱᴍᴀʟʟᴇʀ ʙᴇᴄᴀᴜꜱᴇ ᴘɪᴇᴄᴇꜱ ᴏꜰ ʜᴇʀ ᴡᴇʀᴇ ᴄʜɪᴘᴘᴇᴅ ᴀᴡᴀʏ ʙʏ ᴀꜱᴛᴇʀᴏɪᴅꜱ ᴀɴᴅ ᴛʜᴇ ʙᴇʟᴏᴡ ꜰʀᴇᴇᴢɪɴɢ ᴛᴇᴍᴘᴇʀᴀᴛᴜʀᴇꜱ ᴏꜰ ꜱᴘᴀᴄᴇ.

ɪᴛ ɪꜱ ᴜɴᴋɴᴏᴡɴ ɪꜰ ꜱʜᴇ ᴠɪꜱɪᴛᴇᴅ ᴏᴛʜᴇʀ ᴘʟᴀɴᴇᴛꜱ ᴏʀ ᴇᴠᴇɴ ᴅɪᴍᴇɴꜱɪᴏɴꜱ ᴅᴜʀɪɴɢ ʜᴇʀ ᴅᴇꜱᴄᴇɴᴛ ᴛᴏ ᴇᴀʀᴛʜ ᴅᴜᴇ ᴛᴏ ʜᴇʀ ʙᴇɪɴɢ ɴᴏɴᴠᴇʀʙᴀʟ ᴛɪʟʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜᴜᴍᴀɴ ᴀɢᴇ ᴏꜰ 4. ꜱʜᴇ ɪꜱ ꜱᴛᴀᴛᴇᴅ ᴛᴏ ᴄᴀʀʀʏ ᴇᴏɴꜱ ᴏꜰ ᴋɴᴏᴡʟᴇᴅɢᴇ ᴀɴᴅ ᴛʜᴀᴛ ʜᴇʀ ᴘᴜ��ᴘᴏꜱᴇ ᴏɴ ᴇᴀʀᴛʜ ɪꜱ ᴛᴏ ꜱʜᴀʀᴇ ᴛʜᴀᴛ ᴋɴᴏᴡʟᴇᴅɢᴇ ʜᴏᴡᴇᴠᴇʀ ʜᴇʀ ꜱᴛᴀᴛᴇᴍᴇɴᴛ ᴡᴀꜱ ᴅɪꜱʀᴇɢᴀʀᴅᴇᴅ.

╭━━━━━∙⋆⋅⋆∙━━━━━╮

ᴇxᴘᴇʀɪᴍᴇɴᴛ 0096 ᴀʟꜱᴏ ᴋɴᴏᴡɴ ᴀꜱ ᴛᴀᴛʏᴀɴɴᴀ ᴡᴀꜱ ʀᴇꜱᴄᴜᴇᴅ ꜰʀᴏᴍ ʜᴇʀ ʀᴇꜱᴇᴀʀᴄʜ ʟᴀʙ ʙʏ ɴᴏɴᴇ ᴏᴛʜᴇʀ ᴛʜᴀɴ ꜱʜɪɢᴀʀᴀᴋɪ ᴛᴏᴍᴜʀᴀ. ɪᴛ ɪꜱ ꜱᴛɪʟʟ ᴜɴᴄʟᴇᴀʀ ᴡʜʏ ᴏʀ ʜᴏᴡ ʜᴇ ʀᴇꜱᴄᴜᴇᴅ ʜᴇʀ ᴀꜱ ᴇᴠᴇɴ ꜱʜᴇ ʀᴇꜰᴜꜱᴇᴅ ᴛᴏ ᴄᴏᴍᴍᴇɴᴛ.

ɪᴛ ɪꜱ ᴄᴏɴꜰɪʀᴍᴇᴅ ꜱʜᴇ ʜᴀᴅ ᴀᴛ ʟᴇᴀꜱᴛ ʙᴇᴇɴ ᴡɪᴛʜ ᴛʜᴇᴍ ꜰᴏʀ ᴀ ꜰᴇᴡ ᴍᴏɴᴛʜꜱ. ꜱʜᴇ ꜱᴛᴀᴛᴇᴅ ʜᴇʀ ʀᴇꜱᴄᴜᴇ ᴡᴀꜱ ʙᴇꜰᴏʀᴇ ʜᴇʀᴏ ᴋɪʟʟᴇʀ: ꜱᴛᴀɪɴ ᴄᴏᴍᴇ ᴛᴏ ʜᴏꜱᴜ ᴀɴᴅ ꜱʜᴇ ꜱᴛᴀʏᴇᴅ ᴡɪᴛʜ ᴛʜᴇᴍ ᴜɴᴛɪʟ ꜱʜᴇ ᴡᴀꜱ ʀᴇᴄᴀᴘᴛᴜʀᴇᴅ.

ᴡʜᴇɴ ᴀꜱᴋᴇᴅ ᴛᴏ ᴄᴏᴍᴍᴇɴᴛ, ʜᴇʀᴏ ᴋɪʟʟᴇʀ: ꜱᴛᴀɪɴ ʀᴇᴘʟɪᴇᴅ.

“ꜱʜᴇ’ꜱ ᴘᴜʀᴇ, ꜱᴛᴀɪɴᴇᴅ ʙʏ ᴏᴜʀ ʜᴜᴍᴀɴ ꜱᴏɪʟ. ʜᴇʀ ᴘʜɪʟᴏꜱᴏᴘʜʏ ɪꜱ ᴏᴛʜᴇʀᴡᴏʀʟᴅʟʏ.”

ꜱʜᴇ ᴄʟᴀɪᴍꜱ ɴᴏ ᴘᴀʀᴛ ɪɴ ᴛʜᴇ ᴀʙᴅᴜᴄᴛɪᴏɴ ᴏꜰ ʙᴀᴋᴜɢᴏᴜ ᴋᴀᴛꜱᴜᴋɪ ꜰʀᴏᴍ ᴛʜᴇ ᴜ.ᴀ ᴛʀᴀɪɴɪɴɢ ᴄᴀᴍᴘ. ꜱʜᴇ ꜱᴛᴀᴛᴇꜱ ᴛᴏᴍᴜʀᴀ ʀᴇꜰᴜꜱᴇᴅ ᴛᴏ ʟᴇᴛ ʜᴇʀ ʙᴇ ᴀ ᴘᴀʀᴛ ᴏꜰ ᴛʜᴇ ᴍɪꜱꜱɪᴏɴ ᴀɴᴅ ꜱᴏ ꜱʜᴇ ʜᴀᴅ ᴛᴏ ꜱᴛᴀʏ ʙᴇʜɪɴᴅ ᴡɪᴛʜ ʜɪᴍ.

╭━━━━━∙⋆⋅⋆∙━━━━━╮

ɪᴛ ɪꜱ ᴜɴᴄʟᴇᴀʀ ᴡʜᴀᴛ ʜᴇʀ ᴘᴜʀᴘᴏꜱᴇ ɪꜱ ᴏɴ ᴛʜɪꜱ ᴇᴀʀᴛʜ.

ꜱᴏᴜʀᴄᴇꜱ ᴄʟᴀɪᴍꜱ ꜱʜᴇ ɪꜱ ꜱᴛɪʟʟ ɪɴ ᴄᴏɴᴛᴀᴄᴛ ᴡɪᴛʜ ᴛʜᴇ ʟᴇᴀɢᴜᴇ ᴏꜰ ᴠɪʟʟᴀɪɴꜱ ᴡʜɪʟᴇ ᴏᴛʜᴇʀꜱ ꜱᴀʏ ꜱʜᴇ ʜᴀꜱ ᴀ ꜱɪꜱᴛᴇʀ ɪɴ ᴀ ᴍᴇɴᴛᴀʟ ɪɴꜱᴛɪᴛᴜᴛɪᴏɴ.

ᴏɴᴇ ᴡɪᴅᴇʟʏ ᴅɪꜱᴘᴜᴛᴇᴅ ꜰᴀᴄᴛ ɪꜱ ꜱʜᴇ ʜᴀꜱ ʙᴇᴇɴ ᴘᴀʀᴅᴏɴᴇᴅ ʙʏ ᴛʜᴇ ᴊᴀᴘᴀɴᴇꜱᴇ ɢᴏᴠᴇʀɴᴍᴇɴᴛ ꜰᴏʀ ʜᴇʀ ᴅᴀʏꜱ ᴀ ʜɪᴛᴍᴀɴ ᴄᴀʀʀʏɪɴɢ ᴏᴜᴛ ᴡᴏʀᴋ ꜰᴏʀ ᴛʜᴇᴍ.

ꜱʜᴇ ʟɪᴠᴇꜱ ᴡɪᴛʜ ʜᴇʀ ᴀᴅᴏᴘᴛɪᴠᴇ ꜰᴀᴛʜᴇʀ, ᴀɪᴢᴀᴡᴀ ꜱʜᴏᴜᴛᴀ ᴀɴᴅ ᴅᴏᴇꜱ ᴏᴄᴄᴀꜱɪᴏɴᴀʟ ᴍᴏᴅᴇʟɪɴɢ ᴏɴ ᴛʜᴇ ꜱɪᴅᴇ.

[rhees-rapture]

B&W version comic pages wip