#anthony j Crowley

[heohl-art]

It's Angel's turn🫢🔥✨

Should I draw more of this one?🤔

Btw, I'm so glad so many of you enjoyed my last piece!🩷

Do you know that I made a whole 2025 Ineffable Calendar with my top 12 (+cover) Good Omens fanarts?✨ Check it on my profile if you interested, pinned post🎀

[sixshotsinatumbllr]

The way I hit the follow button so hard when I saw that braid.

Angry Genderfluid Snek Chronicles

Part 1 / 5 !  ( Part 2 - Part 3 - Part 4 - Part 5 )

Guess my Good Omens collection hasn’t yet finished growing…

[ganymedian]

A more tender version of this. with a lot more rigging (0_0 and a fancy new hat

[lutraslutra]

Everyone wondering where the Bench went…

Meanwhile Crowley

[rainydropz]

[raspbel-art]

Had a huge honour and pleasure to collaborate with the loveliest @nipuni in drawing some of the most iconic David's characters 🥰

The first one was drawn by me and coloured by @nipuni and second one drawn by her and coloured by me!

It was such a fun and chill and cosy collaboration, thank you again for collabing with me as well in this fun!! I look at the results of our arts and grow a smile each time, because they turned out incredible 🥹❤️

[zelpharofficial]

👼🐍Staring into each other's eyes

[one-awesome-beetle]

chat the omens aren't looking too good

[ineffable-problem]

That’s Bildad the shuhite

[rustic-ghoul]

Wait wait wait….what if we haven’t got the dyed hair reveal photos yet because they’re starting filming with bearded Aziraphale and longer haired Crowley!!!

Complete speculation here. Just because the last thing I’ve seen of them was Michael with a beard and David with slightly longer than Crowley’s season 2 hair.

And I wouldn’t say we’d have bearded Az and longer haired Crowley for the whole film/season but maaaaybeeee a couple of scenes 👀…just a little thought…don’t think about it too much 🙃

[trashboatprince]

Whatever you say, hun

[anneangel]

Aziraphale is not bad or foolish nor stupid in the last 15 minutes of S2. And he is clearly suffering when Crowley didn't agree to go with him to Heaven, that is noticeable to anyone (or so I suppose).

But, in the same way that Crowley is sad about the whole situation (and about Aziraphale's choice), the audience felt the same way (ok, I know Crowley would never hate Aziraphale, while some fans condemned him and hated him a lot after that). But, getting to my point: I believe that, for most of us, Aziraphale is not "the bad", it's just that the entire 15 minutes were played to make us feel more empathy for Crowley.

He is the one we can identify with the most in the 'lover who declares his affection and is rejected'. Meanwhile, the 15 minutes still have Aziraphale saying that heaven 'is the side of the good guys' (something that would consequently be rejected by Crowley and the audience, who would agree with him in 'Heaven and Hell are toxic').

Its much harder to understand Aziraphale's side when the whole scene is played out in Crowley's favor. Aziraphale ends up coming off as the "poor naive" who leaves his love behind in exchange for trying to make Heaven a more decent place.

But listening: I also don't think Aziraphale thinks Heaven is perfect, he has shown that he doesn't always agree with God's plans or ways (he knows not to ask questions, he warns Angel Crowley, he gave his sword to Adam out of pity after the couple was expelled from Eden, he also didn't agree to kill Job's children). Aziraphale doesn't think Heaven is perfect, just that it's better than the alternative (Hell).

You see, both "Crowley book" and "Crowley show" fear the reprisals of Hell. It's not like Hell in GO isn't bad, because it is.

A while back I saw a poll that asked if you would like to be an angel or a demon, most people chose demon, but only because they use Crowley as a parameter, they want to be like Crowley, so they chose demon, but the question wasn't if you want to be Crowley, but a demon. Crowley is an exception, not the rule. Being a demon is not about being like Crowley, Crowley is the gray aspect between the black and white that Heaven and Hell are (he and Aziraphale are the gray aspect).

So Heaven is relatively more pleasant than Hell, that is beyond doubt. I think that when Aziraphale says "it's heaven, the side of the good guys", he didn't mean that it's the side of the "perfect and good", he was just replying that, compared to the alternative (Hell), Heaven was better.

This doesn't mean that Aziraphale support the publicity of heaven: He doesn't understand all the ordinances of Heaven, but he fears that disobedience and associating with demons (Crowley) will lead to his downfall, he feared that he had fallen after the whole "arc of Job". And he has reason to believe that he could fall if he is disobedient, or if he allies himself with "the wicked".

Angels did not fall only with Lucifer, mind you, biblically speaking 1/3 of the angels allied themselves with Lucifer's rebellion and fell with him (including Crowley). But after that there were other falls, before the flood for example, about 200 angels also fell: for having fallen in love with human women, having sex with them, creating Nephlins, and teaching forbidden knowledge to humans, all of this caused evil to be perpetrated on earth and it hence the flood.

So it is possible that an angel can fall at any time, if he does not fulfill the tasks of heaven and associates with the "wrong people".

Aziraphale does not think that heaven is perfect, but falling is still not a better option: Hell is not a better option.

Furthermore, he does not understand or obey all of Heaven's ordinances: he associated himself with Crowley, as well as committing sins (gluttony?), and others things. But he also knows that "running away" from Heaven (as Gabriel did) is not a good option in the long run.

So Aziraphale made the decision he thought was wisest in relation to Metatron, to find out what was happening in the management of Heaven, and trying to change what he believe is wrong.

See, Crowley's plan to run away isn't ideal, it's also naive foolishness.

Crowley would certainly agree with Aziraphale on "hell is toxic", they are in consensus on that. But, see, in the end of S2 Aziraphale and Crowley were both purposely put in a difficult situation, Metatron knew he would separate them by confronting them with a topic they would disagree on: Heaven.

Aziraphale, by saying "Heaven is the good guys' side," claimed to believe in the status quo. As if he believes that Heaven is broken, but can be fixed. But Crowley, by saying that "Heaven and Hell are toxic," doesn't believe they can be fixed, that it are both toxic precisely because it are functioning as it should.

I don't think either Crowley or Aziraphale is wrong, they just have different opinions based on what they believe. They shouldn't have to apologize for that. Aziraphale hurt Crowley, but Crowley also hurt Aziraphale. They're both hurt.

The reaction to Aziraphale was only so antagonistic because, as I said, the audience tends to identify more with Crowley and his idea that "Heaven and Hell are toxic", so they tend to give him more credibility during these last 15 minutes. But he was also wrong in the way he conducted the conversation.

Aziraphale saying that they can both go to Heaven as angels, is like having to accept that there is only Heaven and Hell and they need to join one of them, in the classic "if you can't beat them, join them". On the other hand, Crowley does not believe that it is possible to "join them", he believes that it is only possible to play against the system and outside of it, as an "us".

Only the plot of the sequel will show which one is being wiser (and I really hope the plot doesn't do it in a way that blames and ridicules one of them).

They both ended up saying things, and acting, in ways that hurt each other in S2. But that happens at least once in a couple's life, doesn't it?

So you see, the second season only separated them to bring them back together in the "sequel" in a more epic way (or so I hope❤️).

[eligejtor]

Oh my i love it

pov: u want to order a drink but this guy keeps sprawling across the entire bar and chatting up divorcées, wyd

+ bonus: just checking

[victims-of-love]

1941

[whoreallycaress25]

this is my take on the dynamic between aziraphale and crowley from the show and book. (after seeing how the fandom argues over ship dynamics)

book omens are asexual all the way, the lazy sunday morning kind of passion. no sex, no efforts, their intimacy is non-sexual, wholesome or (seemingly) not. there is not top/bottom or dom/sub dynamic between them. if there were a dom/sub dynamic, it would be very minor, but it’s not the point and again, non-sexual.

show omens are freaks, very saturday night passion. they have an established dom/sub dynamic, that being aziraphale is the dominant one and crowley is the submissive one. their position switches, no matter the sexes. i cannot see them in the show as the opposite dynamic at all (not counting the dowlings era. there was some very mommy domme energy to that nanny persona hfjakfk)

[yetrop]

Six thousand years of heart eyes.