#U.S. economic strategy Project 2025 | Explore Tumblr posts and blogs

rocket-x · 5 days ago

Text

In-Depth Analysis: The Current State of the Cryptocurrency Market and Rocket-X’s Future Potential

In recent years, the cryptocurrency market has grown from a niche technological experiment into a significant part of the global economy. With Bitcoin surpassing the historic $100,000 milestone, crypto assets are gradually transitioning from speculative tools to mainstream stores of value. However, the continued development of this market requires clearer policy frameworks and innovative market infrastructures—areas where platforms like Rocket-X can play a pivotal role.

The Current State of the Cryptocurrency Market and Forces of Change

After Donald Trump was re-elected as President of the United States, he announced the establishment of a new position called the "AI and Cryptocurrency Czar," appointing experienced former PayPal COO David Sacks to this role.

The creation of this position sends a clear signal: cryptocurrencies and artificial intelligence are becoming central to the U.S. economic strategy. Sacks’ appointment and the pro-crypto policies of the Trump administration are expected to create a clearer legal and regulatory environment for the crypto industry. This will not only attract traditional capital inflows but may also encourage more companies to add Bitcoin and other crypto assets to their balance sheets.

At the same time, institutional confidence in Bitcoin’s long-term bullish trend has reignited market enthusiasm. Bernstein and Standard Chartered both predict that Bitcoin’s price will reach $200,000 by the end of 2025. Whether it’s the rapid growth of Bitcoin ETFs or the Bitcoin funding strategies of companies like MicroStrategy, there is a clear trend of increasing acceptance and deep involvement by traditional financial institutions and enterprises in crypto assets.

However, alongside market optimism comes risk accumulation. Bank of America strategists warn that the strong surge in the crypto market could be masking a bubble, and relaxed regulations might exacerbate economic financialization issues. While attracting capital, the crypto market also faces challenges such as regulatory uncertainty, market manipulation risks, and the lack of professional screening capabilities among retail investors.

In this environment, Rocket-X stands out as an innovative, community-driven launch platform with immense potential.

Rocket-X: A Value Launcher and Ecosystem Aggregator in the Crypto Market

Traditional launch platforms like PUMP and Listcoin have played an important role in crypto project financing but are increasingly showing their limitations.

Platforms like PUMP, with their laissez-faire approach, are often filled with short-term speculative activities and projects of varying quality, posing significant risks to investors.

On the other hand, highly centralized platforms like Listcoin use stringent review processes to ensure project quality but also raise participation barriers for retail investors, limiting their choices. How does Rocket-X address these issues?

Community-Driven Governance ModelRocket-X places community voting at its core, returning the power of project selection and decision-making to its users. This model not only enhances user engagement but also effectively mitigates speculative risks prevalent in the market. Compared to traditional centralized platforms like Listcoin and Binance, Rocket-X’s approach is more transparent and trustworthy.

Catering to Both Institutional and Retail InvestorsFor institutions, Rocket-X provides a compliant investment platform that can attract more traditional financial capital to the crypto space. For retail investors, Rocket-X simplifies participation processes and offers high-quality projects, providing unprecedented market access opportunities for everyday users.

Bridging Traditional Economy and Crypto MarketsBy emphasizing decentralized governance and community autonomy, Rocket-X not only leads in the crypto field but also serves as a bridge for traditional economic players to enter the crypto market. This positioning enables Rocket-X to increase global acceptance of cryptocurrencies and foster synergy between traditional and crypto economies.

Rocket-X: Aligning with Global Economic Trends

In the current market environment, Rocket-X’s potential lies not only in its technology and mechanisms but also in how it aligns with global trends in the crypto industry. The Trump administration’s crypto policy reforms are expected to attract institutional investors, and Rocket-X’s transparency and decentralized design perfectly address their needs for security and efficiency.

As the crypto market moves toward greater regulation, Rocket-X’s community-driven model will further highlight its advantages.

Globally, the acceptance of blockchain and cryptocurrencies is rapidly increasing. Countries like Japan and South Korea have already introduced crypto-friendly policies, while European nations are actively exploring digital currency legislation. As a decentralized launch platform, Rocket-X has the capability to deliver high-quality projects to global markets and set a benchmark for the standardization and transparency of the crypto industry through its DAO governance model.

However, opportunities always come with challenges. As Rocket-X grows rapidly, it must address potential risks. For instance, with increasing competition in the crypto market, attracting high-quality projects and users while balancing community autonomy and platform efficiency are challenges that need careful consideration. Additionally, the uncertainty surrounding global crypto regulations remains a significant external risk for any platform.

In the future, Rocket-X will not only continue to innovate technologically but will also expand its market reach, optimize user experience, and strengthen collaboration with governments and institutions to solidify its market position. Amid a clearer regulatory landscape, Rocket-X is set to become a cornerstone in driving the standardization and scaling of the crypto industry.

Meanwhile, Rocket-X’s community-driven model will have far-reaching impacts on traditional economic systems. By introducing decentralized governance, Rocket-X offers traditional enterprises new operational and management models, pushing them toward greater efficiency and transparency.

0 notes

googleblogs123 · 12 days ago

Text

Automated Forex Signals: Insights from Ukraine’s Crisis

The geopolitical tensions between Ukraine and Russia provide valuable insights into strategic decision-making, mirroring challenges in forex trading. As nations adapt to evolving threats, traders can draw lessons to refine automated forex signals, optimize straight-through processing accounts, and navigate markets with tools like electronic communication network trading. Let’s explore the parallels.

Ukraine’s Strategic Challenges

The Oreshnik Missile Russia’s claims about the Oreshnik missile emphasize leveraging perceived technological superiority. While experts dismiss the weapon as a rebranded intercontinental missile, its psychological impact is undeniable. Similarly, traders must navigate market disruptions by relying on automated forex signals to make data-driven decisions quickly during volatile periods. For more in-depth insights, check out Rich Smart FX.

Insufficient U.S. Aid The $725 million arms package from the U.S. underscores the need for comprehensive resources to counter advanced threats. For forex traders, this parallels the importance of robust forex trading platforms and straight-through processing accounts for efficient market operations. Explore further tools and strategies at Axel Private Market.

Uncertain Alliances With U.S. political shifts potentially altering support for Ukraine, dependency risks loom large. Likewise, traders must diversify tools and platforms, ensuring resilience through reliable online forex brokers to mitigate unforeseen challenges. Gain deeper understanding through DBGM FX.

The Nuclear Option: A Risk-Laden Parallel

Suggestions for Ukraine to reintroduce nuclear weapons reflect high-risk strategies akin to impulsive trading decisions. Such moves can escalate conflicts, just as rash trading actions can lead to significant losses. Instead, traders should prioritize structured approaches, leveraging electronic communication network trading to maintain precision and adaptability in complex markets. For more structured insights, visit GFS Markets.

NATO Membership: A Strategic Pivot

Zelenskyy’s advocacy for NATO membership parallels the need for alliances in trading ecosystems. For traders, comparing features across platforms—such as those offering straight-through processing accounts—ensures stability and access to global markets during uncertain times. For optimal platform comparison, check out Top Max Global.

Economic and Strategic Impacts

Defense Spending Trends Russia’s allocation of 32.5% of its 2025 budget to defense and NATO’s projected 28.3% signal a focus on military readiness over economic growth. These dynamics influence currency stability, underscoring the importance of robust forex portfolio planning to manage risks effectively. Get tips on building a resilient portfolio at World Quest FX.

The Oreshnik’s Implications If Russia’s claims about the Oreshnik hold true, it could reshape modern warfare. For traders, staying competitive requires adopting innovations like automated forex signals, ensuring preparedness for market shifts. Explore further tools for competitive trading at Rich Smart.

Preparing for the Future

The evolving Ukraine-Russia conflict raises critical questions:

How will global political changes affect markets?

Can calculated decisions avert larger crises?

How should traders position themselves amid heightened uncertainties?

By integrating lessons from global events, traders can refine currency trading methods and leverage advanced tools. Success in volatile environments relies on preparation, adaptability, and strategic use of resources such as electronic communication network trading and automated forex signals, ensuring a competitive edge in the dynamic forex market.

#Automated forex signals #Online forex brokers #Straight-through processing accounts #Electronic communication network trading #Major currency pairs in forex

0 notes

mylittlesecrethaven · 13 days ago

Text

I Read Project 2025, So Here's A Rundown I Guess: Part 3.5

Idk if this counts as political, but I'm just reading the stupid book online and putting down what it basically says and some other stuff I huess. (it could get political I guess? Idk. Just kinda wanted to make these posts since I'm reading the book and I kept getting annoyed with people just saying what the book says instead of writing down exactly what it says and what page to find it on)

(That's not saying I won't do the same thing, but for some things I'll rewrite what it says unless it just needs to be summarized. I will have page numbers though)

(also, if this stuff does go into effect, I will be fearing for my life and the lives of many others for the effects this could have on people. for lgbtq, minorities in religion, race, and ethnicity, and those who are poor. this will effect everyone and a lot of people should be afraid of it. that is not be getting political, that is me saying that this is a scary plan meant to give powerful people even more power)

(also, if you want a faster rundown than waiting for me to give shitty interpretations of this, go to the wiki here. it sums it up pretty well, but it doesn't state everything.)

Department of Defense Reforms -

Special Operations Forces:

Define irregular warfare as a means by which the U.S. uses all elementals of national power to show influence abroad to counter state enemies and deter wider conflict to maintain peace in great-power competition, characterize the state and nonstate irregular threats facing the U.S. by region, incorporate the irregular warfare resources, capabilities, and strategies in the National Defense Strategy instead of having it in a separate document, establish an Irregular Warfare Center of Excellence to help train, equip, and organize to conduct irregular warfare when it is needed (Pages 121-122)

Task organizations in the Pentagon with resourcing and executing operations to counter China's Belt and Road Initiative, use information operations to highlight Chinese violations of Exclusive Economic Zones, human rights, coercion along Chinese fault lines in Xinjian Province, Hong Kong, and Taiwan, and China's weaponization of sovereign debt, directly counter Chinese economic power with all elements of nation power in North America, Central America, and the Caribbean (Page 122)

Designate USSOCOM as the lead for the execution of irregular warfare in the National Defense Strategy, demonstrate a willingness to use offensive cyber capabilities against those that use cyberattacks against U.S. infrastructure, businesses, personnel, and governments, make information regarding the names of entities that target democratic processes and international norms available, employ economic warfare, lawyer. and diplomatic pressure against hostile states and nonstates. maintain the necessary authorities for aggressive counterterrorism methods against threats to the homeland (Pages 122-123)

Nuclear Deterrence:

Speed up the timeline for modernization programs such as the Sentinel Missile, Long Range Standoff Weapon, Columbia-Class Ballistic Missile Submarine, B-21 Bomber, and F-35 Dual Capable Aircraft, reject any congressional proposals that would extend the service lives of U.S. capabilities like the Minuteman III ICBM, ensure sufficient funding for Warhead Life Extension Programs for things like the B61-12, W80-4, W87-1 Mod, and W88 Alt 370 (Pages 123-124)

Support and accelerate the funding for the Sea-Launched Cruise Missile-Nuclear with the goal of having its deployment by the end of the decade (Page 124)

Consider attaining more modernized nuclear systems than currently planned, increase the U.S.'s ability to "utilize the triad's upload capacity" in case of a crisis (talking about China I think), review what capabilities are also needed with the SLCM-N to deter the unique China threat (Page 124)

Accelerate the effort to restore plutonium pit production, continue to invest in rebuilding infrastructure that support nuclear weapon development, restore readiness to test nuclear weapons at the Nevada National Security Site (Pages 124-125)

Reject proposals for nuclear disarmament that work against the goal of protection, pursue army control as a way to secure national security for the U.S. and its allies, prepare to compete to secure U.S. interests should the current arms control efforts fail (Page 125)

Missile Defense:

Reject claims from the left that missile defense is destabilizing while acknowledging that China and Russia are developing their own advanced missile systems, commit to keeping homeland missile defense off the table in any arms control negotiations with China and Russia (Page 126)

Buy at least 64 of the Next Generation Interceptor for an eventual fleet of interceptors, consider additional steps to strengthen GMD systems such as a layered missile defense or a third interceptor site along the East Coast (Page 126)

Prioritize gaining more regional defense systems such as Theater High Altitude Area Defense, Standard Missile-3, and Patriot Missiles (Page 126)

Abandon existing policy of not defending the homeland against Russian and Chinese ballistic missiles and focus on how to improve defenses against these sorts of attacks, invest in future advanced missile defense technologies like directed energy or space-based missile defense to protect against more numerous missile attacks (Pages 126-127)

Invest in cruise missile defense of the homeland, accelerate the program to develop space-based sensors to better detect and track missile trajectories, accelerate the Glide Phase Interceptor which is intended to counter hypersonic weapons (Page 127)

#project 2025

0 notes

justsaying4041 · 15 days ago

Text

Project 2025’s Economic Vision: A Critical Look at Proposed Reforms to Treasury Department Operations

As the United States braces for the upcoming economic changes proposed under Project 2025, the focus has shifted toward the Treasury Department and its role in managing fiscal policy. These proposed reforms, while aiming to streamline operations and enhance economic oversight, have raised concerns among experts and policymakers about their long-term implications on federal operations and the…

View On WordPress

#Economic Impact of Project 2025 #Economic Vision for Treasury Policies #Federal Financial Operations Overhaul #Fiscal Policy and Project 2025 #politics #Project 2025 #Project 2025 Economic Strategies #Treasury Department Critical Analysis #Treasury Department Reforms #U.S. Economic Reform Proposals

0 notes

marketanalysisdata · 27 days ago

Text

Industrial Automation And Control Systems Market Size, Status, Analysis and Forecast 2030

The global industrial automation and control systems market was valued at USD 206.33 billion in 2024 and is projected to experience significant growth, with an anticipated compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 10.8% from 2025 to 2030. This rapid expansion is primarily driven by the increasing demand for greater efficiency, precision, and safety in manufacturing industries. As companies seek to improve productivity and reduce human error, the adoption of advanced automation technologies such as robotics, artificial intelligence (AI), and Internet of Things (IoT)-based control systems has accelerated. Moreover, the ongoing digital transformation and the integration of Industry 4.0 principles have made real-time monitoring, predictive maintenance, and optimized workflow management essential for businesses that wish to remain competitive in the modern industrial landscape. Other contributing factors include rising labor costs and the growing shortage of skilled workers, which have incentivized companies to invest in automation solutions to maintain operational efficiency and business competitiveness.

Gather more insights about the market drivers, restrains and growth of the Industrial Automation And Control Systems Market

Regional Insights:

North America Industrial Automation And Control Systems Market Trends

The industrial automation and control systems market in North America is expected to witness significant growth and remain a leader globally. This growth is fueled by the region’s strong focus on advanced manufacturing and a high rate of technological adoption. Industries such as automotive, aerospace, and electronics continuously seek innovative solutions to improve production efficiency, reduce operational costs, and maintain global competitiveness, which drives the demand for automation systems. The region also benefits from a well-established infrastructure and strong economic policies that promote digital transformation and the adoption of emerging technologies like robotics and AI. Government incentives and investments in cutting-edge technologies further support the widespread adoption of industrial automation, making North America a dominant player in this market.

U.S.: The U.S. has emerged as a dominant force in the industrial automation and control systems market, driven by increasing demand across various sectors such as manufacturing, healthcare, and logistics. The country’s highly developed industrial base prioritizes technological innovation to remain competitive on the global stage.

Asia Pacific Industrial Automation And Control Systems Market Trends

The Asia Pacific region is set to continue its dominance in the industrial automation and control systems market, accounting for over 39% of the global market share in 2024, with expectations to maintain this leading position from 2025 to 2030. The region’s rapid industrial growth, alongside the increasing demand for higher productivity, cost efficiency, and quality control, has significantly contributed to the adoption of automation solutions. In addition, foreign investments in manufacturing sectors and a strong emphasis on the adoption of Industry 4.0 technologies have further fueled this trend. The presence of large-scale manufacturing facilities in key sectors such as electronics, automotive, and heavy industries, combined with government incentives aimed at modernizing production, has solidified Asia Pacific’s substantial market share in industrial automation.

China: China plays a pivotal role in the industrial automation and control systems market. Its vast manufacturing base, coupled with a strong push for increasing production efficiency, has created a surge in demand for automation technologies. As China transitions from labor-intensive manufacturing to more technology-driven production, automation becomes central to the country's strategy.

India: India’s industrial automation and control systems market is on an upward trajectory, driven by the country’s rapid industrialization and government initiatives like “Make in India,” which promotes domestic manufacturing. Furthermore, as India pushes forward with smart city initiatives and large-scale infrastructure projects, automation and control technologies are becoming integral to the country’s modernization efforts, significantly contributing to the market’s growth.

Europe Industrial Automation And Control Systems Market Trends

In Europe, the industrial automation and control systems market is experiencing steady growth, supported by a strong commitment to sustainability and energy efficiency in manufacturing. One of the key drivers of this growth is the European Union’s stringent regulations aimed at reducing carbon emissions and promoting energy conservation. As industries across Europe strive to meet these regulations, they are increasingly turning to automation technologies that optimize energy usage, improve efficiency, and minimize waste. The growing demand for sustainable manufacturing practices has made industrial automation an essential tool for European companies, leading to ongoing growth in the market.

Browse through Grand View Research's Category Sensors & Controls Industry Research Reports.

The global gas detection equipment market size was estimated at USD 5.60 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow at a CAGR of 11.7% from 2025 to 2030.

The global biometric sensor market size was valued at USD 2.09 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow at a CAGR of 19.8% from 2025 to 2030.

Key Companies & Market Share Insights:

The competitive landscape highlights the industry dynamics reshaping the global market. Incumbent companies and new entrants anticipate organic and inorganic growth strategies, such as product launches, mergers & acquisitions, technological advancements, and geographical expansion, to remain pronounced in the forecast period.

Key players operating in the industrial automation and control systems market and their company profiles are:

Rockwell Automation, Inc. is headquartered in the U.S. The company provides products, solutions, and services within the industrial automation domain. The company’s critical operating segments include architecture & software and control products & solutions. The U.S. is the company’s highest revenue-generating region. Other key countries where the company holds a strong presence include Brazil, Germany, UK, Italy, Mexico, Canada, and China.

Siemens is headquartered in Germany. The company operates in industrial engineering, electrification, automation, and digitization verticals. The company is involved in manufacturing energy-efficient systems for medical diagnosis, power generation, and transmission and provides industrial infrastructure solutions worldwide.

Key Industrial Automation And Control Systems Companies:

ABB Ltd.

Emerson Electric Co.

Honeywell International, Inc.

Kawasaki Heavy Industries, Ltd.

Mitsubishi Electric Corporation

OMRON Corporation

Rockwell Automation, Inc.

Schneider Electric

Siemens AG

Yokogawa Electric Corporation

Order a free sample PDF of the Industrial Automation And Control Systems Market Intelligence Study, published by Grand View Research.

#Industrial Automation And Control Systems Industry Forecast

0 notes

marketstudyreport · 27 days ago

Text

Industrial Automation And Control Systems Market – Analysis, Industry Size And Forecast, 2030

Gather more insights about the market drivers, restrains and growth of the Industrial Automation And Control Systems Market

Regional Insights:

North America Industrial Automation And Control Systems Market Trends

Asia Pacific Industrial Automation And Control Systems Market Trends

Europe Industrial Automation And Control Systems Market Trends

Browse through Grand View Research's Category Sensors & Controls Industry Research Reports.

The global gas detection equipment market size was estimated at USD 5.60 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow at a CAGR of 11.7% from 2025 to 2030.

The global biometric sensor market size was valued at USD 2.09 billion in 2024 and is projected to grow at a CAGR of 19.8% from 2025 to 2030.

Key Companies & Market Share Insights:

Key players operating in the industrial automation and control systems market and their company profiles are:

Key Industrial Automation And Control Systems Companies:

ABB Ltd.

Emerson Electric Co.

Honeywell International, Inc.

Kawasaki Heavy Industries, Ltd.

Mitsubishi Electric Corporation

OMRON Corporation

Rockwell Automation, Inc.

Schneider Electric

Siemens AG

Yokogawa Electric Corporation

Order a free sample PDF of the Industrial Automation And Control Systems Market Intelligence Study, published by Grand View Research.

#Industrial Automation And Control Systems Industry Forecast

0 notes

marketingresercher · 30 days ago

Text

Off-Highway Wheels Market Growth, Trends and Share Chart by 2032

The Off-Highway Wheels Market Report offers an in-depth overview of this industry, summarizing essential findings such as market size, growth forecasts, and key trends. It examines market segmentation by region, product type, end-users, and applications, providing targeted analysis to support strategic decision-making. The report also assesses industry dynamics, identifying primary growth drivers, challenges, and future opportunities. CEOs, analysts, and other stakeholders will benefit from the included SWOT analysis, which outlines the competitive strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats in the Off-Highway Wheels Market.

According to Straits Research, the global Off-Highway Wheels Market size was valued at USD 1556.2 Million in 2023. It is anticipated to grow from USD XX Million in 2024 to USD 2555.8 Million by 2032, with a projected CAGR of 6.12% over the forecast period (2024–2032).

Report Structure

Market Overview: Introduction to the Off-Highway Wheels Market and its key features.

Economic Impact: Analysis of economic factors affecting the industry.

Production & Opportunities: Insights into production processes, business opportunities, and growth potential.

Trends & Technologies: A look at emerging trends, technological advances, and leading players.

Cost & Market Analysis: Examination of manufacturing costs, marketing strategies, regional market shares, and segmentation by type and application.

Request a Free Sample (Full Report Starting from USD 1850): https://straitsresearch.com/report/off-highway-wheels-market/request-sample

New Features in the 2025 Report

Expanded Industry Overview: A more thorough and detailed industry analysis.

In-Depth Company Profiles: Enhanced profiles with comprehensive information on major market players.

Customized Reports & Analyst Support: Tailored reports and direct analyst access available on request.

Off-Highway Wheels Market Insights: Analysis of recent market developments and upcoming growth opportunities.

Regional & Country-Specific Reports: Customized insights focused on particular regions or countries to meet specific needs.

Key Off-Highway Wheels Market Industry Players

The report features top companies in the Off-Highway Wheels Market, including

Titan International, Inc.

Trelleborg AB

Moveero Limited

Jantsa Jant Sanayi

Accuride Corporation

Rimex

Sun Tyre and Wheel Systems

Relations Race Wheels

Steel Strips Wheels Limited

Black Rhino Wheels

Dirty Life Wheels

Stealth Custom Series Wheels

KMC Wheels

Method Race Wheels

Steel Strips Wheels

Maxion Wheels

GKN Wheels and Structures

Fuel Offroad Wheels

Worx Off-Road

Raceline Wheels

Work Wheel USA

Enkei Wheels

TrailBuilt Off-Road

Rays Wheels

STARCO

Baluchistan Wheels Limited

Topy Industries Ltd

Sun Tyre and Wheel Systems

OTR Wheel Engineering

Hayes Lemmerz

Off-Highway Wheels Market Segmentation

The Off-Highway Wheels Market is segmented into various components, offering insights into each segment's growth prospects.

By Product Type

Alloy Wheel

Steel Wheel

By Application Type

Agriculture

Construction

Material Handling

Mining

For more details: https://straitsresearch.com/report/off-highway-wheels-market/segmentation

Regional Analysis for Off-Highway Wheels Market

North America: A leading region in the Off-Highway Wheels Market, driven by technological advancements, high consumer adoption rates, and favorable regulations. The U.S. and Canada are primary contributors to regional growth.

Europe: Experiencing consistent growth due to strict regulations, a strong sustainability focus, and high R&D investments. Key growth markets include Germany, France, the UK, and Italy.

Asia-Pacific: The fastest-growing region, fueled by rapid industrialization, urbanization, and a rising middle class. Key markets include China, India, Japan, and South Korea.

Latin America, Middle East, & Africa: Emerging growth areas with increasing demand due to economic development and improved infrastructure. Notable markets include Brazil, Mexico, Saudi Arabia, UAE, and South Africa.

Why Invest in This Report?

Market Warning Factors & Geopolitical Impact: Highlights challenges such as regulatory hurdles, supply chain disruptions, and geopolitical factors that may affect growth.

Latest Macroeconomic Indicators: Analyzes GDP growth, inflation, and consumer spending to assess their impact on the Off-Highway Wheels Market.

Technology Factors & ESG Trends: Focuses on technological innovations and the influence of ESG trends on strategies and consumer expectations.

Research Objectives & Methodology: Utilizes a robust research approach, including primary and secondary sources, expert interviews, and data triangulation for accurate insights.

Limitations & Assumptions: Acknowledges constraints like data availability and market volatility that may impact the outlook.

Currency & Pricing Considerations: Provides forecasts in [Currency], analyzing currency fluctuations and their effect on pricing and profitability.

Detailed Table of Content of the Off-Highway Wheels Market Report: https://straitsresearch.com/report/off-highway-wheels-market/toc

Scope of the Off-Highway Wheels Market Report

COVID-19 Impact: Evaluates the pandemic's immediate and long-term effects on the Off-Highway Wheels Market.

Industry Chain Analysis: Examines pandemic-driven changes to the industry supply chain, including marketing channel shifts.

Purchase the Report: https://straitsresearch.com/buy-now/off-highway-wheels-market

About Straits Research

Straits Research is a top provider of business intelligence, specializing in research, analytics, and advisory services, with a focus on delivering in-depth insights through comprehensive reports.

Email: [email protected]

Address: 825 3rd Avenue, New York, NY, USA, 10022

Phone: +1 646 905 0080 (US), +91 8087085354 (India), +44 203 695 0070 (UK)

1 note · View note

allupdatesofmarket · 14 days ago

Text

Professional Skin Care Market Analysis 2025-2033: Demand, Innovation, and Competitive Landscape

Professional Skin Care Market

The Global Professional Skin Care Market size is projected to grow at a CAGR of XX% during the forecast period.

The Global Professional Skin Care Market Research Report provides a comprehensive evaluation of the present industry scenario and future growth prospects over the forecast period. The research report analyzes and summarizes all important aspects of the market including technological evolution, recent industry trends and competitive landscape, market segmentation and key regions.

Research Methodology

Our research methodology constitutes a mix of secondary & primary research which ideally starts from exhaustive data mining, conducting primary interviews (suppliers/distributors/end-users), and formulating insights, estimates, growth rates accordingly. Final primary validation is a mandate to confirm our research findings with Key Opinion Leaders (KoLs), Industry Experts, Mining and Metal Filtration includes major supplies & Independent Consultants among others.

The Global Professional Skin Care Market Report provides a 360-degree view of the latest trends, insights, and predictions for the global market, along with detailed analysis of various regional market conditions, market trends, and forecasts for the various segments and sub-segments.

Get Sample Report: https://marketstrides.com/request-sample/professional-skin-care-market

LIST OF KEY COMPANIES PROFILED:

Clinique

Dior

Babor

Environ SkinCare

Longrich

Chcedo

Estee Lauder

Vichy

Nimue

Marykay

Lancome

Aupres

SKII

Fancl

Shiseido

L’Oreal

Guinot

Olay

Dermalogica

Artistry

SEGMENTATION

By Type

Moisturizers

Cream

Lotion

Powders

Sprays

Masks

Others

By Application

Neutral Skin

Dry Skin

Oily Skin

Mixed Skin

Sensitive Skin

Get In-Detail : https://marketstrides.com/report/professional-skin-care-market

Professional Skin Care Market REGIONAL INSIGHTS

North America

United States: The U.S. economy has shown resilience post-pandemic but faces inflationary pressures, particularly in housing and consumer goods. The Federal Reserve's interest rate policies remain a focus, as the balance between controlling inflation and avoiding recession has impacted spending, borrowing, and business growth. Key sectors like tech, finance, and renewable energy are experiencing dynamic changes, with AI, fintech, and green technology receiving heavy investments.

Canada: Economic stability remains a hallmark of Canada’s economy, although housing affordability and household debt are pressing issues. Canada continues to emphasize a green energy transition, investing in hydroelectric, wind, and solar power. The nation is also focused on attracting skilled labor, especially in technology, healthcare, and energy, as part of its economic strategy.

Mexico: Mexico has benefited from a nearshoring trend, as companies look to relocate manufacturing closer to the U.S. market. With a strong trade relationship via USMCA (the U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement), Mexico is seeing investments in its automotive, aerospace, and electronics industries. However, inflation, interest rates, and a need for infrastructure development remain areas of focus.

Buy Now : https://marketstrides.com/buyNow/professional-skin-care-market?price=single_price

FAQ

+ What are the years considered for the study?

+ Can the report be customized based on my requirements?

+ When was the Research conducted/published?

+ What are the mixed proportions of Primary and Secondary Interviews conducted for the study?

+ When will the report be updated?

𝐀𝐛𝐨𝐮𝐭 𝐔𝐬

Market Strides is a Global aggregator and publisher of Market intelligence research reports, equity reports, database directories, and economic reports. Our repository is diverse, spanning virtually every industrial sector and even more every category and sub-category within the industry. Our market research reports provide market sizing analysis, insights on promising industry segments, competition, future outlook and growth drivers in the space. The company is engaged in data analytics and aids clients in due-diligence, product expansion, plant setup, acquisition intelligence to all the other gamut of objectives through our research focus.

𝐂𝐨𝐧𝐭𝐚𝐜𝐭 𝐔𝐬:[email protected]

#Professional Skin Care Market Size #Professional Skin Care Market Share #Professional Skin Care Market Growth #Professional Skin Care Market Trends #Professional Skin Care Market Players

0 notes

amansagaripd · 2 months ago

Text

Caplin Point Share Price Target 2024 to 2030 : An Detail Analysis

Caplin Point Laboratories has carved out a significant niche in the pharmaceutical industry, focusing on the production of generics and specialty injectables. As the market evolves, investors are keen to evaluate potential Caplin Point share price target 2024 , 2025, and 2030. This article explores these projected price targets while also examining the key factors that could influence the company's performance in the coming years.

Caplin Point Share Price Target 2024

For the year 2024, Caplin Point is expected to see steady growth, particularly in emerging markets like Latin America and parts of Africa. These regions have a growing demand for affordable healthcare options, and Caplin Point’s reputation for delivering quality generics positions it well to meet this need. The company's established distribution networks and partnerships with local healthcare providers will be instrumental in enhancing its market penetration.

Analysts predict that the Caplin Point share price target for 2024 could range between INR 1350 and INR 1900. This forecast is primarily driven by the anticipated increase in demand for the company's injectable products, which typically offer higher margins compared to conventional generics. Additionally, Caplin Point's strategic initiatives to expand its product range and improve its market presence could contribute positively to its revenue stream.

Nevertheless, several challenges may impact this optimistic outlook. Regulatory hurdles in international markets could lead to delays in product approvals, potentially affecting the launch of new offerings. Furthermore, the competitive landscape remains fierce, with many established and emerging players vying for market share. Caplin Point must navigate these competitive pressures while ensuring its pricing strategy remains viable.

Caplin Point Share Price Target 2025

As we look towards 2025, the success of Caplin Point will hinge significantly on its investments in research and development (R&D). The company aims to strengthen its R&D efforts to develop complex generics and specialty injectables, which tend to yield higher profits. By prioritizing innovation, Caplin Point seeks to diversify its product offerings and respond effectively to market demands.

In addition, Caplin Point is making headway in the U.S. market through its subsidiary, Caplin Steriles. This subsidiary is focused on securing additional approvals for its injectable products, which have become increasingly sought after in the U.S. healthcare landscape. Analysts estimate that the Caplin Point share price target 2025 could fall within the range of INR 1900 to INR 2500, depending on how effectively the company executes its growth plans.

Despite this optimistic projection, risks remain. Regulatory challenges, especially in the U.S. and European markets, could delay product launches and affect revenues. Moreover, the intensifying competition could compel Caplin Point to revise its pricing strategies, potentially impacting its profitability.

Caplin Point Share Price Target 2030

Looking further ahead to 2030, the future of Caplin Point appears promising if the company successfully implements its strategic vision. Caplin Point aims to broaden its footprint in developed markets, particularly the U.S. and Europe, by introducing a diverse range of specialty injectables and complex generics. Should these initiatives come to fruition, analysts believe the Caplin Point share price target 2030 could reach between INR 2,000 and INR 2,500.

This favorable outlook is underpinned by the increasing global demand for specialty pharmaceuticals. Caplin Point's focus on high-margin products positions it well to capitalize on this trend. Moreover, the company's commitment to R&D will be crucial in developing innovative solutions that meet market needs, allowing it to maintain a competitive edge.

However, potential risks could hinder this growth. Economic fluctuations, such as currency volatility and potential global recessions, may adversely impact Caplin Point's financial performance. Additionally, any significant changes in healthcare regulations or pricing policies in key markets could pose challenges to the company’s long-term growth.

Key Factors Influencing Caplin Point’s Share Price

Several factors are likely to affect Caplin Point’s share price in the years ahead:

Regulatory Environment: Successfully navigating the regulatory landscape is crucial for Caplin Point. Any delays or issues in securing product approvals could limit its offerings and hinder growth prospects.

Market Expansion: The company’s ability to enter and establish a presence in new geographical markets will be vital. A successful entry into Europe and the U.S. could significantly boost revenues.

Investments in R&D: Continuous investment in research and development is essential for innovation. Caplin Point's capacity to develop new, in-demand products will have a considerable impact on its market position.

Competitive Landscape: The pharmaceutical industry is characterized by intense competition. Caplin Point must remain agile to adapt to evolving market conditions and competitor strategies.

Economic Conditions: Economic factors, such as inflation and currency fluctuations, can influence Caplin Point’s overall financial health and profitability.

Healthcare Demand: As the demand for affordable healthcare solutions continues to grow, Caplin Point’s commitment to quality and effective medications positions it favorably to meet this need.

Conclusion

Caplin Point Laboratories stands out as a promising investment opportunity with favorable projections for Caplin Point share price targets for 2024, 2025, and 2030. While the company faces challenges such as regulatory hurdles and competitive pressures, its strategic initiatives, focus on innovation, and commitment to quality provide a strong foundation for future growth. Investors should remain attentive to both opportunities and risks as they evaluate Caplin Point’s potential in the dynamic pharmaceutical market.

#finance #stockmarket

0 notes

misfitwashere · 3 months ago

Text

Election 2024 Video of the Week: Trump’s Bonkers Economic Plan

Video #4

ROBERT REICH

SEP 27

Friends,

This week’s Election 2024 Video of the Week focuses on Trump’s bizarre economic plan.

To remind you, the goal of this series is not to preach to the converted but to give you facts, analysis, and arguments to share with those who aren’t.

Please share — especially with people who are leaning toward Trump, are wavering in their support of Kamala Harris, or haven’t made up their minds.

youtube

Earlier this week, Trump summarized his economic “plan.” Not surprisingly, it’s incoherent and filled with lies. In today’s video, I focus on five key parts of it.

#1: Trump’s crazy tariff plan

Trump seems genuinely confused about what tariffs are and who pays them.

TRUMP: We are taking in billions and billions of dollars in tariffs that China is paying for.

Nope. Tariffs are not paid by the other country. They’re paid by the American importer, with the cost typically passed onto American consumers, as even Fox Business pundits have to admit.

Targeted tariffs on specific products can give American-made goods an edge over imports, but there’s no strategy behind the tidal wave of tariffs Trump is proposing.

But Trump wants you to pay at least a 60 percent tax on everything imported from China and a 10 percent tax on everything imported from anywhere else. This would cost the average family an estimated $2,500 extra per year.

And this is a regressive tax, taking a higher percentage of the paychecks of the working class and the poor than out of the incomes of the wealthy.

#2: Trump’s plan for monopolies would create more of them

If you’ve watched our other videos, you know that corporate monopolies are among the biggest drivers of inflation. When there are fewer competitors, corporations can raise prices without worrying about losing customers to a cheaper competitor. Trump and the MAGA team want to make this worse.

Trump’s Project 2025 specifically seeks to fast-track airline mergers.

And as part of Trump’s efforts to solicit campaign donations from Big Oil executives, he’s suggested fast-tracking oil mergers. This would let them pump up your gas prices.

And speaking of gas prices, let’s talk about how …

#3: Trump would hike energy prices

Trump’s promising to kill the Biden-Harris administration’s clean energy incentives and fuel efficiency standards. This means you’ll be spending more on fuel because your car will need more gas and your appliances will use more electricity.

#4: Trump would make your money worth less

The American economy is strong right now compared to those of other nations, so the American dollar is worth more vs. the euro, the yen, and other major currencies. At a moment when Americans are worried about how far their dollar goes, most people would call that a good thing.

But Trump and his economic advisers are reportedly so obsessed with trade deficits that they’re looking for ways to devalue the dollar.

This might help big corporations that export products, but it would also raise import prices and overheat a U.S. economy already running hot.

#5: Trump’s wild deportation plan would drive up costs still further

Trump would decimate the American workforce — and he’s bragging about it.

TRUMP: We’ll carry out the largest domestic deportation operation in American history.

Putting aside the horrific moral consequences, this would make the whole economy collapse.

There are more than a million undocumented laborers in construction, over a million undocumented farm workers, and about a million undocumented food service workers. What do you think will happen to the price of food and housing if these workers are suddenly deported? Prices will explode.

By the way, these are not jobs that Americans born here in the United States are competing for, because most pay very little and many are dangerous.

In sum, Trump has no understanding of the economy.

He was terrible at business — which is why he’s driven so many businesses into the ground. (He’s even driven casinos into the ground. How do you lose money running a casino?)

Given another chance, he’ll drive the American economy into the ground, too.

A tad more than five weeks to Election Day. Please share this video, and do whatever else you can.

Thanks for joining me today.

#robert reich #Youtube

0 notes

xtruss · 4 months ago

Text

Trump’s Foreign-Policy Influencers!

Meet The 11 Men Whose Worldviews Are Shaping The 2024 Republican Ticket.

— 26 August 2024 | Foreign Policy Feature | By Foreign Policy Staff

Oriana Fenwick Illustration/Getty Images

If former U.S. President Donald Trump wins the White House again, what might his foreign policy look like? The Republican candidate often shoots from the hip—consider his grand declaration that he can end the Russia-Ukraine war in a single day as just one example. Trump is also quick to distance himself from policy shop documents, such as the Heritage Foundation’s Project 2025, when they become politically inconvenient.

But beyond the noise of the campaign trail, one way to gauge the possible foreign-policy agenda of a second Trump term is to profile the key national security thinkers in his orbit: Who are the advisors he listens to? What is the genesis of the ideas that animate the former president’s current worldview?

Consider the list below a handy guide in the days and weeks leading up to Nov. 5. But first, a few disclaimers. The men listed below (and yes, they’re all men—the picks reflect what our sources told us) are ranked not in order of importance but in alphabetical order. The names are not earmarked for any particular roles, such as national security advisor or secretary of state; we thought it best to just describe the people whose views and ideas could have a meaningful impact on Trump’s foreign-policy decisions. And lastly, the spirit of this endeavor is to add some texture to what is a common parlor game in Washington these days—nobody, of course, can actually claim to know exactly what Trump will do.

And now, here’s the list you came here for. — The Editors

Elbridge Colby (L), Fred Fleitz (R)

Elbridge Colby

Elbridge Colby, a once and possible future Trump administration defense official, is the loudest and perhaps most cogent voice in Washington advocating a complete shift away from Europe, NATO, and Russia and toward the growing challenge from China.

Colby served as a deputy assistant secretary of defense for more than a year in the Trump administration, where he helped put teeth into the belated U.S. pivot to Asia. He then joined with other Trump administration veterans to co-found the Marathon Initiative, a Washington-based think tank focused on great-power competition. If he gets another shot in a future Trump administration—and his name has been floated for another defense position or even a job with the National Security Council—he would hammer home his overarching point: China, not Russia, is America’s biggest problem.

In a series of articles, books, and speeches, Colby has for years made the case for the United States to use its limited defense resources to prevent a hostile hegemonic power from gaining ascendancy over the Asia-Pacific region. China has already economically cowed many of its smaller neighbors, and it continues to chip away at regional security in places such as the South China Sea. But Taiwan is the real test: A Chinese effort to reincorporate the island by force would mean a conflict with the United States and likely Japan—and, if successful, would open China up to domination of the entire Pacific Basin, the world’s most important economic region by far.

Colby’s ideas are a timely reprisal of one of the original blueprints of U.S. grand strategy, written by Nicholas Spykman in the middle of World War II, but turned on its head: Asia, not Europe, is now the economic and political center of gravity of the world, and its domination by Beijing would severely constrain America’s future prospects and freedom of action.

One problem for Colby is that his potential future boss, while willing to be plenty hostile to China at times, is also utterly transactional, and Trump has already signaled his willingness to barter away Taiwan’s autonomy. Realist hawks such as Colby tend to sit uncomfortably with a foreign policy that has no true north.

Another problem is that Colby’s vocal and repeated urgings to use limited U.S. resources exclusively for the big China fight that may one day come, even if that means abandoning Ukraine in the middle of a war, are grist for the Kremlin’s goons; Russian state television cheers Colby’s foreign-policy priorities.

Lawmakers may not buy an Asia-only defense strategy anyway, in a future Trump administration or a future Kamala Harris one. A congressionally mandated defense review panel argued in July that the United States should prepare to defend its vital interests in both Europe and Asia.

—Keith Johnson

Fred Fleitz

Despite being a longtime member of the U.S. national security community, Fred Fleitz is a hard-nosed proponent of the Trump-driven anti-establishment MAGA ideology that roiled Washington for four years. Fleitz is a Trump administration veteran who has emerged as one of the former president’s few top advisors on national security on the campaign trail.

Fleitz, alongside Keith Kellogg, drafted a plan for Trump to review aimed at ending the war in Ukraine if Trump wins reelection. The plan entails pushing Ukraine and Russia to come to the negotiating table and brokering a temporary cease-fire at the current battle lines, which would be sustained during the peace talks. The Trump administration would pressure Ukraine on one side by threatening to cut off U.S. aid if it didn’t negotiate, and Russia on the other by threatening to open the floodgates on U.S. military aid to Ukraine without peace talks. The proposal marks the most detailed preview yet of what a Trump White House’s Ukraine policy could look like if Fleitz and others in his orbit joined the administration.

Fleitz is vice chair of the Center for American Security at the America First Policy Institute, the think tank founded in 2021 to keep MAGA boots on the ground in Washington as Team Biden took power. He is a regular commentator on the right-wing news channel NewsMax and the author of Obamabomb: A Dangerous and Growing National Security Fraud and The Coming North Korea Nuclear Nightmare: What Trump Must Do to Reverse Obama’s ‘Strategic Patience.’

Fleitz has garnered controversy over his past comments and affiliations with hard-right and anti-immigrant groups that opponents refer to as fringe and Islamophobic. (He later distanced himself from some of those past affiliations.)

Fleitz spent more than two decades working in the U.S. government, bouncing between posts at the CIA, Defense Intelligence Agency, State Department, and the Republican side of the House Intelligence Committee. For significant chunks of his career, he circled the orbit of the pugnacious neoconservative hawk John Bolton, serving as his chief of staff in the George W. Bush administration when Bolton was the undersecretary of state for arms control, and then later as the National Security Council chief of staff when Bolton was Trump’s national security advisor.

Bolton has since broken very publicly with Trump, but Fleitz remains nestled in the MAGA world. While Trump has given no indication of who would staff his administration if he won, many Republican insiders say Fleitz is near the top of the list.

—Robbie Gramer

Ric Grenell (L), Keith Kellogg (R)

Ric Grenell

Within hours of presenting his diplomatic credentials to German President Frank-Walter Steinmeier in 2018, Trump’s new ambassador to Berlin, Ric Grenell, took to Twitter to demand that German companies doing business with Iran should “wind down operations immediately.” The diplomatic relationship went downhill from there.

Disagreements with the German government were aired publicly, as Grenell—a political appointee—threatened to withdraw U.S. troops from Germany over the country’s lackluster defense spending and impose sanctions over the Nord Stream 2 pipeline, which would have increased the country’s dependency on Russian energy. Wolfgang Kubicki, the vice president of the German Parliament, at one point accused Grenell of acting as if the United States was “still an occupying power.”

The pugilistic diplomat’s approach may have horrified Berlin’s mild-mannered political establishment. But if ambassadors are judged by their ability to convey their boss’s message, Grenell was an effective foot soldier. He was later appointed as the special envoy to the Balkans—where he was accused of causing the government of Kosovo to collapse—and acting director of national intelligence, becoming the first openly gay person to hold a cabinet-level position.

A graduate of Harvard University’s Kennedy School of Government, Grenell worked as a spokesperson for a number of prominent Republicans before joining the 2000 presidential campaign of former Sen. John McCain—who would later become one of Trump’s most vehement critics.

From 2001-2008, Grenell served as the director of communications for the U.S. mission to the United Nations under four ambassadors, including John Bolton, who would go on to serve as Trump’s national security advisor.

Long before the Trump presidency, Grenell was known for his combative tweets—which, like those of his future boss, often took swipes at journalists and mocked the appearance of prominent women Democrats.

While several senior figures in the Trump administration broke with the former president during the ignominious end to his tenure, Grenell remained loyal. In the wake of the 2020 presidential election, Grenell was dispatched to Nevada to help challenge the results of the vote—despite knowing that there was no basis to the claims, according to a recent profile in the New York Times.

Since leaving government, Grenell has served as Trump’s envoy, traversing the world, meeting with far-right leaders, and undercutting the State Department—including in Guatemala. It’s that loyalty that is likely to land him a senior foreign-policy job in a future Trump administration.

A secretary of state needs to be “tough” and a “son of a bitch,” Grenell said during an appearance on the Self Centered podcast in March.

Keith Kellogg

When Michael Flynn was fired from his role as U.S. national security advisor just 22 days into Trump’s first term after lying about conversations with the Russian ambassador to the United States, Keith Kellogg was one of the first people considered to replace him. He didn’t get the job, which went to another three-star Army officer: H.R. McMaster. Instead, Kellogg advised Vice President Mike Pence and served as the chief of staff to the National Security Council.

In those roles, Kellogg was caught up in some of the most pivotal moments of Trump’s presidency. Kellogg said he heard “nothing wrong or improper” on the July 2019 call where Trump urged Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to investigate Biden. And Kellogg privately urged Pence to certify the 2020 election “TONIGHT” while a pro-Trump mob was still being cleared from the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021. But Kellogg nonetheless endorsed Trump over Pence in August 2023, criticizing Pence for concentrating on “political maneuvering” and his image. (Pence withdrew from the presidential race in October 2023 and has not endorsed Trump.)

Since then, Kellogg has sought to become a key member of Trump’s national security brain trust at the America First Policy Institute, a pro-Trump think tank that is seen in Washington as a White House in waiting. Kellogg—a Vietnam War veteran who was serving as a three-star Army general in the Pentagon when al Qaeda flew a Boeing 757 into the west side of the building on Sept. 11, 2001—is at once pro-Ukraine and pro-NATO and yet willing to exact Trump’s famous brand of leverage on both. He’s tried to put teeth behind Trump’s pledge to end Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine “in a day,” mapping out a plan that would cut U.S. military aid to Ukraine if Kyiv refused to go to the bargaining table, but boost it if the Kremlin refused to negotiate.

At the July NATO summit in Washington, where European officials sought out Trump insiders, Kellogg was one former official taking meetings with U.S. allies. But the message they got might not have been the one that they wanted to hear. Kellogg has said that NATO countries that don’t meet the alliance’s defense spending target are violating the Washington Treaty (Trump threatened at a campaign rally earlier this year not to defend NATO allies that weren’t hitting the bloc’s spending mark of 2 percent of GDP ).

—Jack Detsch

Robert Lighthizer

Few members of the Trump administration still maintain a large degree of influence on policy. But Robert Lighthizer, Trump’s trade representative, current advisor, and perhaps future Treasury secretary, has become such an influential economic voice, especially through his back-to-the-past vision of trade, that he has helped shape the Biden administration’s newfound love of trade wars.

Lighthizer, a longtime trade lawyer who began his public service career in the Ronald Reagan administration, turned Trump’s inchoate notions on trade and the economy into a more or less coherent policy. Now, with Trump campaigning to return to the White House, Lighthizer is eager to double down on the policies he pursued the first time around.

Those famous Trump tariffs—on steel, aluminum, and many products from China—were the fruit of Lighthizer’s vision, and he was just getting started. He believes raising taxes on American consumers and businesses for things they import will make them import less; in an ideal world, it would also make American businesses manufacture and export more things as well.

His plans for the future, as laid out in books and writings since he left office, include much higher tariffs on a bigger range of countries (all of them, actually) in order to balance the ledger of American imports and exports, with a particular eye on China—one of America’s biggest trading partners and its top geopolitical rival. Ultimately, his objective is to get much closer to full “decoupling” from China than the lukewarm and partial “de-risking” now favored by the Biden team.

It’s of little concern to Lighthizer and some of Trump’s other still-influential trade advisors such as Peter Navarro (who was released from prison in July) that the avalanche of tariffs and belligerent trade policy achieved none of their stated aims. The trade deficit, the main concern for tariff hawks such as Trump and Lighthizer, grew under their watch. U.S. exports shrank, as did, in the end, manufacturing jobs (thanks to COVID-19).

Retaliatory tariffs by friends and allies curbed U.S. trade options abroad and weakened the prospects for an anti-China coalition. Consumer prices, juiced by import taxes, rose. China did not moderate any of the predatory economic behavior that prompted the trade wars in the first place, and in fact has made its own form of turbocharged, export-driven industrial policy the very centerpiece of its own economic rejuvenation.

But, as Lighthizer himself has argued, it takes time to right a ship that’s on the wrong course. Maybe this time the same old remedies will produce dramatically different results.

—Keith Johnson

Johnny McEntee

In the summer of 2020, as Trump was running for reelection, an email from the White House invited Pentagon officials to sit down for interviews with a pair of staffers, where they would be evaluated for positions in a second Trump administration. After a spate of high-profile resignations in the building as the White House increasingly sought to assert itself over the Defense Department, officials saw the interviews as a test of loyalty to Trump.

The man behind the email was White House Presidential Personnel Office Director John McEntee. A onetime walk-on quarterback at the University of Connecticut, McEntee served as the president’s “body man” for the first year of the administration. He was fired by White House Chief of Staff John Kelly in 2018 for failing a background check due to a gambling investigation, only to return two years later, this time in charge of the powerful personnel office.

It’s often said in Washington that personnel is policy. Many of Trump’s early appointments came from the traditional Republican foreign-policy pool: more international, pro-trade, pro-NATO, and pro-ally than the standard MAGA crowd. Kelly, National Security Advisor H.R. McMaster, Secretary of Defense Jim Mattis, and Secretary of State Rex Tillerson formed the “axis of adults” that largely controlled the levers of foreign policy for Trump’s first two years in office—even as the commander in chief finger-wagged at Washington’s perceived “deep state” for allegedly slow-walking his agenda.

But late in the game, McEntee would help get MAGA-approved people into top jobs. He helped orchestrate Trump’s reshuffling of the Pentagon brass, including the firing of then-U.S. Defense Secretary Mark Esper. He also tried, with others, to stack the Pentagon’s top policy boards with close Trump allies. Had Trump won, McEntee would have played a key role in trying to implement Trump’s planned “Schedule F” reforms that would have essentially turned tenure-track government jobs into at-will employees.

Since then, loyalty tests have become standard practice in Trump world. McEntee is now at the Heritage Foundation, a conservative think tank, where he’s helping to spearhead Project 2025—an initiative that calls for the next president to “confront the Deep State.” If you want in on a list of would-be Trump appointees, you have to send in your phone number and fill out a detailed questionnaire, largely predicated on loyalty to Trump.

—Jack Detsch

Christopher Miller

Christopher Miller had some early missteps after being named Trump’s acting secretary of defense in November 2020—literally. First, he tripped on his way up the steps and into the Pentagon. And then when he got up to give his first public speech at the U.S. Army’s national museum two days later, he forgot his prepared remarks under his seat.

It set the tone for perhaps the wildest two-month tour that any Pentagon chief has ever had. Trump moved Miller from the National Counterterrorism Center to take over for Esper as acting secretary of defense. Trump announced via tweet that Esper had been fired, less than 48 hours after the networks began calling the presidential election for Biden.

Miller, a former Green Beret, was given an ambitious lame-duck agenda for the Pentagon ahead of Biden’s inauguration. The Pentagon was tasked with withdrawing U.S. troops from Afghanistan, Syria, and Somalia—all in the course of two months.

Miller faced widespread criticism for his failure to approve the deployment of the National Guard to contain the Jan. 6, 2021, pro-Trump insurrection at the U.S. Capitol for more than three hours after the Pentagon became aware of the breach. Miller said later that he feared creating “the greatest Constitutional crisis” since the Civil War by deploying active-duty U.S. troops. He has also said that Trump deserves blame for stoking the riots—but he hasn’t explicitly ruled out working for him again.

“I thought he was really good,” Trump told radio host Hugh Hewitt in a December interview, describing Miller and his short stint at the Pentagon. “I thought he was very good.”

—Jack Detsch

Stephen Miller

Throughout Trump’s term, Stephen Miller made a name for himself as the radical architect of the president’s hard-line—and highly controversial—immigration policies. If Trump triumphs in November, he is widely expected to again lean heavily on Miller, who has already outlined sweeping new proposals to overhaul U.S. policy and crack down on immigration.

As Trump’s then-senior advisor and speechwriting chief, Miller played a pivotal role in shaping his presidential agenda. He drove forward some of the former U.S. leader’s most contentious schemes, including his family separation policy, known as zero tolerance, and the so-called Muslim ban, which barred travel and refugee resettlement from several Muslim-majority countries to the United States. Beyond pushing to slash refugee admission numbers, he reportedly also wanted to deploy troops to close off the United States’ southern border and proposed banning student visas for Chinese nationals.

Miller was known for encouraging some of Trump’s more hard-line positions, even in situations where other advisors reportedly urged the president to exercise restraint. In 2019, Miller came under fire after a batch of leaked emails published by the Southern Poverty Law Center, a legal advocacy group, revealed that he privately touted white nationalist views. The emails, which were exchanged between Miller and conservative news site Breitbart News, date back to 2015 and 2016.

Today, Miller spends much of his time waging legal battles against “woke corporations,” despite having no formal legal training. In 2021, he founded the America First Legal Foundation, a conservative legal advocacy organization focused on challenging the Biden administration and the practices of private companies, including Kellogg and Starbucks. “America First Legal is holding corporate America accountable for illegally engaging in discriminatory employment practices that penalize Americans based on race and sex,” the company said.

If Trump defeats Harris in November, Miller has vowed an overhaul of U.S. immigration policy. “Any activists who doubt President Trump’s resolve in the slightest are making a drastic error: Trump will unleash the vast arsenal of federal powers to implement the most spectacular migration crackdown,” he told the New York Times. “The immigration legal activists won’t know what’s happening.”

Under a potential second Trump term, Washington would dramatically expand policies aimed at cracking down on immigration, including by halting the U.S. refugee program and reinstalling some variation of the Muslim travel ban, the New York Times reported. Trump envisions conducting sweeping public workplace raids, enacting mass deportations, and constructing “vast holding facilities” to detain those awaiting deportation, Miller said. The former U.S. leader is also eager to terminate the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, or DACA, he said.

“I don’t care what the hell happens in this world,” Miller told right-wing personality Charlie Kirk in a podcast interview earlier this year. “If President Trump gets reelected, the border’s going to be sealed, the military will be deployed, the National Guard will be activated, and the illegals are going home.”

—Christina Lu

Robert O’Brien

Trump cycled through three national security advisors during the first two years of his tenure before settling on one who fit just right: Robert O’Brien. He stuck around for the remainder of Trump’s presidency.

A Los Angeles lawyer, O’Brien began his White House role as special envoy for hostage affairs. He helped to secure the release of Americans from prisons in Turkey and Yemen, as the Trump administration prioritized the plight of Americans wrongfully detained abroad.

More memorably, O’Brien led the administration’s efforts to lobby Sweden, an ally, to release the American rapper A$AP Rocky following a request from the rapper Ye, formerly known as Kanye West, according to the New York Times. Rocky had been convicted on assault charges.

As national security advisor, O’Brien had significantly less experience than his predecessors. He proved to be low-key and loyal, and served out the remainder of the Trump administration without major controversy.

In the wake of the 2020 presidential election, O’Brien became one of the first senior Trump officials to acknowledge, if grudgingly, that Biden had won the vote. “If the Biden-Harris ticket is determined to be the winner, and obviously things look that way now, we’ll have a very professional transition from the National Security Council. There’s no question about it,” he said at a virtual meeting of the Global Security Forum.

O’Brien has remained close with the former president and is likely to be tapped for a senior role should Trump return to the Oval Office.

In an essay in Foreign Affairs published in June, O’Brien sketched out the contours of a future Trump foreign policy: “A Trumpian restoration of peace through strength.” China is the primary focus, as O’Brien calls for a muscular posture in the Indo-Pacific, including the deployment of the entire Marine Corps to the region and for a U.S. aircraft carrier to be transferred from the Atlantic to the Pacific.

O’Brien also advocated for the United States to resume nuclear weapons testing, not carried out since 1992. “Washington must test new nuclear weapons for reliability and safety in the real world for the first time since 1992—not just by using computer models,” O’Brien wrote.

—Amy Mackinnon

Kash Patel (L) Mike Pompeo (R)

Kash Patel

Kash Patel had a meteoric ascent during Trump’s tenure, rising from little-known staffer on the House Intelligence Committee to chief of staff to the acting secretary of defense in the last months of the administration, despite having no military background. As an aide to Rep. Devin Nunes, who was then chair of the House Intelligence Committee, Patel was central to efforts to challenge accusations that the Trump team had inappropriate contact with Russian government officials while on the campaign trail.

Patel was reportedly the lead author of a controversial 2018 memo that alleged that law enforcement officials had acted improperly when they sought permission to surveil the communications of former Trump campaign aide Carter Page. While Democrats slammed the decision to release the document, describing it as a partisan attack on the justice system, a court later found that some of the surveillance warrants against Page were unjustified.

After a stint at the National Security Council as senior director for counterterrorism, Patel moved to the Office of the Director of National Intelligence in 2020 as a senior advisor to the director of national intelligence, where he became integral to the former president’s attacks on the intelligence community, pressing for declassification of documents from the investigation into Russia’s efforts to interfere in the 2016 presidential election.

In the waning days of the Trump administration, the former president reportedly considered firing CIA Deputy Director Vaughn Bishop and replacing him with Patel, according to Axios. If then-CIA Director Gina Haspel resigned in protest—which she threatened to do—Patel or another Trump ally would be appointed to lead the sprawling intelligence agency, according to reports.

Patel would likely play an integral and senior role should Trump return to the Oval Office. In an appearance on Steve Bannon’s podcast in December, Patel said a second Trump administration would target and prosecute journalists. “Yes, we’re going to come after the people in the media who lied about American citizens, who helped Joe Biden rig presidential elections—we’re going to come after you. Whether it’s criminally or civilly, we’ll figure that out,” he said.

Patel has also authored a children’s book titled The Plot Against the King, a revisionist fairy-tale rendering of the Russia investigation in which Patel appears as a wizard who informs the kingdom that King Donald “did not work with the Russonians.”

—Amy Mackinnon

Mike Pompeo

Mike Pompeo was one of the few Trump cabinet officials to maintain a strong relationship with the brash and mercurial president throughout his term in office. Trump plucked Pompeo from relative obscurity as a Kansas congressman to be his first CIA director. As head of the premier U.S. intelligence agency, Pompeo forayed into diplomacy by secretly traveling to North Korea to lay the groundwork for direct talks between Trump and North Korean leader Kim Jong Un.

In 2018, as Trump sacked his first secretary of state, Tillerson, he announced Pompeo as his replacement. Pompeo joined the State Department vowing to restore “swagger” to the diplomatic corps after the Tillerson era, prompting relief among some longtime diplomats and eye rolls from others. While at the State Department, Pompeo was careful to ensure he remained a top player in Trump’s inner circle, even when it put him at odds with the embattled diplomatic corps—during Trump’s tumultuous first impeachment hearing, for example, and other scandals involving harassment, mismanagement, and watchdog investigations into Trump appointees at the State Department.

Pompeo, a California native, graduated first in his class at the U.S. Military Academy at West Point, served as a U.S. Army officer, and attended law school at Harvard. He moved to Kansas in the 1990s and served as a member of Congress for the state’s 4th district from 2011 to 2017 before joining the Trump administration. After Trump was voted out of office, Pompeo did not join other top Trump administration officials in condemning the storming of the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, and Trump’s demonstrably false claims of election fraud.

Pompeo briefly toyed with the idea of running for president but bowed out of the race early on when he failed to raise his national profile or as much money as other Republican challengers to Trump like Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis or former South Carolina Gov. Nikki Haley. In June, he established a new private equity firm with veteran financiers that aims to back mid-sized technology companies.

Mike Pompeo About CIA : “We Lied, We Cheated, We Stole”

Pompeo still maintains close ties with Trump and his inner circle, and many Republican insiders believe he would be a top contender for a senior administration role, such as secretary of defense, if Trump is reelected.

In Trump’s circle, Pompeo is among the most outspoken advocates of Ukraine. He visited Kyiv in early April and told Fox News that arming Ukraine was the “least costly way to move forward.” Many European officials believe that the appointment of Pompeo to a senior cabinet position would be a good thing for Ukraine and NATO, and bad news for Russia.

An ardent hawk, he was also a primary driver of Trump’s withdrawal from the Iran nuclear deal and architect of the former president’s muscular approach to China that now largely has bipartisan backing.

—Robbie Gramer

#Donald J. Trump #US Elections 2024 #US Foreign Policy #United States 🇺🇸#Republi(CUNTS)#Trump’s Foreign Policy Influencers #11 Boak Bollocks

0 notes