#Rogue actors

[religion-is-a-mental-illness]

UK Govt to be sued over trans ideology being taught in primary schools | Dr Anna Loutfi

Andrew Doyle: Dr Anna Loufti and The Bad Law project are suing the government for trying to teach children as young as five divisive issues. Families of some of the children have come together to file a class-action lawsuit against the UK government and the Department of Education. They're calling for Personal Social Health and Economic education, known as PSHE, to be abolished in schools and for parents to have the right to withdraw their children from the lessons dealing with sex health and relationships. I'm delighted to say that Equality and Human Rights Barrister Dr Anna Loutfi joins me now

Can I ask you firstly about what's going on in schools, because I've seen some materials from various parents in terms of sex education, some of it has been quite shocking actually, but I think still people deny that there is any kind of problem here.

Dr. Anna Loutfi: Yeah I think when you introduced us now the topic you talked about and the department for Education teaching children in schools, that is not the issue. What's the issue is that we have rogue actors who are posing as charities, what we call the third sector, these organizations, they are completely unregulated, they produce the materials, sometimes they produce the materials outside of the national jurisdiction.

So we'll find for example certain local education authorities using materials that have been taken from the United States, and there is no oversight on the content of these materials and what we are finding is that advocacy groups are choosing their own pick and mix ideas of what children should or shouldn't know, there's no oversight, parents are not really invited to be part of that discussion and what we do see is that some of these materials clearly engage both the civil law and the criminal law in terms of their suitability for children at certain age groups.

Doyle: So there's the the element of the the sexual explicit aspect I mean I have a friend who's a parent of a boy of six, she showed me some of the materials and she said when she tried to have her son removed, they told her you can't, the government says this is compulsory. So although it is an outside agent providing the materials the school seems to believe that the government is making them do it do you think that's possible?

Loutfi: Yes, 100%. I've seen the materials myself. I think we've lost, thanks to the third sector which has now seized complete control of education in this area called PSHE, we have lost control of regulation in the same manner as we would lose control if there had been a military coup, and we had a hunter taking control of the schools. We're simply not allowed to have the conversation about what these materials are for, what the purpose of them is, but more importantly we have, as a nation speaking about the UK, we have lost any discernment about what age groups are suitable for certain kinds of materials. We simply have stopped having that conversation. All materials provided by the third sector two schools are considered to be appropriate because the third sector has appointed itself experts in the area. And therefore if something is considered age inappropriate by a parent or a teacher but the experts, the third sector says no no this is absolutely fine that becomes the end of the conversation. And any parent, any teacher and any young person who has qualms, as we saw in the school in East Sussex where two 13 year old girls raised questions about what they were being taught in PSHE, they're actually insulted and called bigots.

Doyle: Yes, so it's not just about the age inappropriate materials, there's also the ideological aspect to this. So children are being taught, and I've seen materials that prove this. In a number of schools children are being taught, often by outside agents, that there are over 100 genders or that we each have an innate sexed soul, a gendered soul. This is effectively a quasi-religious belief taught us fact. Now, a couple years ago Kemi Badenoch stood up in Parliament and said that the teaching of Critical Race Theory in schools was against the law. Is the teaching of gender identity ideology as fact also against the law?

Loutfi: It is, and let's be very clear this isn't just about gender identity, although that is the issue that the parents that have come to me have raised. But let's be very clear: the Education Act 1996 is very explicit that the promotion of any idea that is contentious is unlawful. And by promotion, what the statute says is that you cannot present an idea that is contentious as if it is the only idea or the only version or the only world view available on that topic. There has to be a dispassionate, fair and non-partisan presentation of the facts. That would apply to a whole range of issues.

Doyle: So a teacher could say, there are many people who believe in such a thing as gender identity, there are a minority of the country but there are people who believe that, most people don't believe that, but let's have a discussion about that. That would be okay?

Loutfi: That would be lawful.

Doyle: That would be lawful.

Loutfi: But that isn't what is happening. Iin fact I can I can cite materials. My favorite example is the one of the Gender Galaxy which, when you talk about religious cults, we have a Gender Galaxy and one of the sets of materials that I saw where the Gender sun is circled by all of these different gender identities, little planets going around and it's a huge glorious galaxy with all of these exciting planets. And in the background, in the distance, there's this sad little sun called the Sex Assigned at Birth Galaxy and there are two little tiny sad planets going around that sun in the background, and they are male and female.

The messaging is really clear, but it uses pseudo-scientific astronomical imagery to present the idea that in the universe, there is the exciting Galaxy that is all these choices of gender identities and then there's the boring male and female Assigned at Birth. I mean if you are a young person and you would like to be cool or you'd like to be interesting or you'd like to be different, this is a clear pathway for you to have an identity that signals you out as interesting. And unfortunately we know as James, my dear friend James who was just on now, as he pointed out, we know that this links children into pathways, social and medical, which are irreversible, and which do result in mutilated bodies.

Doyle: To what extent are the likes of Stonewall and Mermaids responsible for this? Those are two groups that do believe in gender identity ideology, they are effectively religious groups now. But I remember seeing a leaked presentation for Mermaids which was a training presentation in which they showed a spectrum of male and female according to Barbie on one end of the spectrum and G.I. Joe on the other. Basically reinforcing what I would say are 1950s stereotypes of what it means to be male and female to young people. Is that the problem?

Loutfi: Yes, I mean Stonewall and Mermaids are two actors, there are many other charities as well. We need to understand as a country the relationship that they have with the Department for Education, why the Department for Education is consulting such people, and not consulting people with a different view.

But there is another issue here. And that is the Equality Act 2010 has a list of protected characteristics on the basis of which you cannot discriminate. One of those characteristics is gender reassignment. As a lawyer the only way I can know what gender reassignment actually means in law, is if I go to something called the Gender Recognition Act 2004 which makes it clear that that is a procedure that is available only to persons of 18 and over. So therefore, the question is why have Mermaids and Stonewall decided to redesign the law according to their fantasy world where gender reassignment is a process that is something that anybody at any age, even in the womb, can engage in and anybody who questions that is a bigot? And you're not allowed to raise very basic safeguarding concerns about what might happen to somebody under the age of 18 who starts the process of interfering with their biology.

Doyle: People are going to be astonished by this, because Stonewall has been accused in the past of representing the law as they would like it to be.

Loutfi: That's exactly what they've done.

Doyle: How can that be the case, in that, why hasn't the government called them up on it, and why are they so embedded, I mean certainly in like the SNP, in the Welsh government, they seem to be very much embedded. I mean, the Welsh government is pushing forward all sorts of these kinds of PSHE programs which teach gender ideology as though it is fact?

Loutfi: Well because we live in a society which is not only anti-intellectual, which means that sound bites rule, but we live in a society that is also driven by repetition of slogans and mantras. If you say something often enough it becomes reality. As a lawyer it doesn't matter to me what people say, it's what the law puts into black and white and I'm finding that even lawyers, even government ministers, are disregarding the black letter of the law, and they are simply repeating mantras that you hear on social media. "Trans women are women," "gender identity is a protected characteristic," these are not legally based arguments. They are mantras, they are advertising slogans, and they are adopted by powerful corporations in order to promote ways of life and products that profit them.

Doyle: Of course activists would say, but you know, at school with young people it's very important to teach them that if children are struggling with their gender, or if children are gay or or from a minority group, that they do need protecting and they need to be shown that we live in an inclusive world what would you say to that?

Loutfi: I would say that we struggle with a lot of things, but we cannot as a society adopt a position where we say anything that you struggle with, society will embrace your desire to be something other than you are. Because if that is true, many young people struggle with suicide ideation, so therefore we should affirm suicide in young people. Wherever somebody wishes to self-harm, anorexics who wish to starve themselves to death, or people who wish to cut their arms with razor blades, are expressing an inner struggle and an idealistic notion of escape from their reality. It is not the business of schools to facilitate that self-harm and we have to be, as a country and a culture and as a moral society, discerning about what we embrace, what we encourage, and what we don't. The fact that a child is struggling is not, in and of itself, justification for the entire society to facilitate a pathway to self-destruction.

Doyle: So it looks like from your perspective the law is the way through this?

Loutfi: Absolutely.

Doyle: Just challenging it in the courts, clarifying the law, all of that.

Loutfi: And the law is clear, we don't even, it's very clear. I believe in the rule of law. Unfortunately, many of my colleagues in the legal profession seem to have abandoned that idea and find it quite old-fashioned. But I believe in the rule of law and I believe that the Gender Recognition Act is very clear, that gender reassignment is a process that is available for people of 18 or over. And anybody promoting the idea that there's something other that the law says, that there's something called gender identity and you can have it at age three, age five, age seven, age nine, is a liar. And the question we should be asking is why are they lying? And I would say the old-fashioned profit motive is one particular avenue that we could go down, but there may be others as well and I find that it's very sinister indeed.

==

A tour de force from Dr. Loutfi.

[ilucyliu-blog]

How to Store Your Crypto – 6 Alternatives to Cryptocurrency Exchanges

Users are leaving centralized exchanges as increased scrutiny highlights issues with reserves. Secure ways of storing crypto include self-custodial wallets and regulated crypto custodians. There is no one-size-fits-all solution, and different users will have different needs in custody. The recent collapse of the cryptocurrency exchange FTX was a stark reminder of the vulnerability of these…

[ncuts]

Mood

[xxautumnivyxx]

I’m proud of you for whatever steps you managed to take.

[getamovieon]

[thenotoriousscuttlecliff]

Seeing people say that we never see the Doctor and Ruby talking for more than 30 seconds makes me think 73 Yards and Dot and Bubble has just clouded their memories because the first four episodes of this era are almost nothing but the Doctor and Ruby talking and bonding.

Yeah, the Doctor-lite episodes meant we haven't had as much lately, but so many are going on as there's been none at all, as if every episode before 73 Yards was like Rogue where they were mostly separated in their own plotlines.

[cawyden-gaming]

Rogue Trader - Heinrix voiced lines for mobile phone etc.

I have asked Christopher Tester on cameo to read some lines to be used as alerts and ring tone on mobile phones (or other devices). The video (if you like to watch him) is here.

In case this is interesting for you:

He was already so kind to provide the single files as mp3 and I converted them for iPhones to mr4.

Both formats are available here.

Here are the texts:

Ringtone

Lord Captain, we don't have much time - there is an incoming vox call for you. I assure you, this is not a corrupted vox cast. According to preliminary data, it seems to be important and the Inquisition requires your cooperation in accessing this information. Allow me to remind you that you are under orders from the Lord Inquisitor to provide support in deeds great and small that serve to safeguard our interest – well, this is it. Are you really sure you can allow yourself to not accept this call? By the throne, can you please respond to the vox call? What will it take for you to finally act? This ends now, Rogue Trader.

New voicemail

Rogue Trader, I have discovered a vox recording that might be of shared interest for us both.

New SMS

Lord Captain, I happened to be present when the astropaths received a new message. I have already decrypt it for you, no thanks required.

New Email

Lord Captain, I was asked to deliver this letter to you. I would ask you to read it as soon as you find the time.

Calender event/reminder

Lord Captain, something very important is about to happen. Steel yourself and be prepared. Trust me - you do not want to miss it.

[liauditore]

new suicide squad anime got me thinking about the genderbend batman au i made when i was 16 again.

extra (nsfw??? body horror + shirtless doodle lol) art under the cut + drabble.

A mysterious actress appears in Gotham!

Production for the long-anticipated remake of the 1930s classic horror film, "The Clay", is saved in part thanks to the audition of one woman with no credits to her name, just a face and demeanor identical of the late leading actress of the original film.

However, the cast and crew have bigger worries than their limited budget and endless demands from their producers -- everyone involved seems to be disappearing one by one!

While the average gothammite worries that the cult classic's "cursed" reputation might be a little more than an urban legend, The Batman refuses to entertain such unfounded silliness and aims to get to the bottom of this crime against cinema!

presenting BATMAN '63 - THE RISE OF CLAYFACE coming not actually ever lmao

(her hair is brown now because I like the idea of her appearance never being fully consistent lol. shapeshifters gotta do their thing)

[fortheloveofbritishactors]

SAS Rogue Heroes - BBC releases first-look at the return of Steven Knight’s hit drama

[jaal-ama-daravv]

"You mon-keigh never learn. I'm beginning to think that your kind is eager to step into our snares."

[mayhaps-a-blog]

It's probably my taste in men but it really feels like Doctor Who is trying really hard to convince me the blandest white guys ever are somehow the hottest shit on Earth, and also space. And also time.

[go-see-a-starwar]

Hayden Christensen + Diego Luna Variety's Actors on Actors

[bread-blogs]

The part in X2 where everyone is fleeing the mansion and Logan tries to stay behind to give them a better chance of escape but Bobby and Rogue won’t leave him. He’s their family now and they won’t leave him.

[xxautumnivyxx]

New drop this weekend featuring one of Cynthia Martin’s versions of Rogue. Had to do a classic of our favorite touch starved red head. 😏

Officialautumnivydotcom

[getamovieon]

[ilovemesomevincentprice]

Vincent Price - Rogue's Regiment (1947)