Tumgik
#Expert Adviser
khokonfx · 2 years
Text
Providing powerful forex expert adviser
Providing powerful forex expert adviser
We are providing powerful forex expert adviser. Our all forex robot have demo version and live demo version. You can check easily on your MT4 platform. If you satisfied than contact with us. 100% risk-less way to earn profit from forex we sell profitable EA very low cost. A foreign exchange trading robot, also known as a forex trading bot, is a form of algorithmic trading that uses forex market signals to determine whether a currency pair should be bought or sold at a particular point. Such tools are usually completed automated and can be easily integrated with many different online brokers or trading platforms https://khokonfx.com/
0 notes
forexdailynews · 2 years
Text
The Complete Explanation Of Expert Advisor And Its Functionalities
Summary: Being continually active around them is clearly impossible for people, but a computer can trade for days without stopping. One of the main reasons why Forex robots are so popular is that they take the place of humans.
Read the full article here
Tumblr media
0 notes
wonder-worker · 3 months
Text
"Among their complaints [in 1460, the Yorkists] specifically blamed the earls of Wiltshire and Shrewsbury and Viscount Beaumont for ‘stirring’ the king [Henry VI] to hold a parliament at Coventry that would attaint them and for keeping them from the king’s presence and likely mercy, asserting that this was done against [the king's] will. To this they added the charge that these evil counselors were also tyrannizing other true men* without the king’s knowledge. Such claims of malfeasance obliquely raised the question of Henry’s fitness as a king, for how could he be deemed competent if such things happened without his knowledge and against his wishes? They also tied in rumors circulating somewhat earlier in the southern counties and likely to have originated in Calais that Henry was really ‘good and gracious Lord to the [Yorkists] since, it was alleged, he had not known of or assented to their attainders. On 11 June the king was compelled to issue a proclamation stating that they were indeed traitors and that assertions to the contrary were to be ignored." - Helen Maurer, "Margaret of Anjou: "Queenship and Power in Late Medieval England"
Three things that we can surmise from this:
We know where the "Henry was an innocent helpless king being controlled and manipulated by his Evil™ advisors" rhetoric came from**.
The Yorkists were deliberately trying to downplay Henry VI's actual role and involvement in politics and the Wars of the Roses. They cast him as a "statue of a king", blamed all royal policies and decisions on others*** (claiming that Henry wasn't even aware of them), and framed themselves as righteous and misunderstood counselors who remained loyal to the crown. We should keep this in mind when we look at chronicles' comments of Henry's alleged passivity and the so-called "role reversal" between him and Queen Margaret.
Henry VI's actual agency and involvement is nevertheless proven by his own actions. We know what he thought of the Yorkists, and we know he took the effort to publicly counter their claims through a proclamation of his own. That speaks louder than the politically motivated narrative of his enemies, don't you think?
*There was some truth to these criticisms. For example, Wiltshire (ie: one of the men named in the pamphlet) was reportedly involved in a horrible situation in June which included hangings and imprisonments for tax resistance in Newbury. The best propagandists always contain a degree of truth, etc. **I've seen some theories on why Margaret of Anjou wasn't mentioned in these pamphlets alongside the others even though she was clearly being vilified during that time as well, and honestly, I think those speculations are mostly unnecessary. Margaret was absent because it was regarded as very unseemly to target queens in such an officially public manner. We see a similar situation a decade later: Elizabeth Woodville was vilified and her whole family - popularly and administratively known as "the queen's kin" - was disparaged in Warwick and Clarence's pamphlets. This would have inevitably associated her with their official complaints far more than Margaret had been, but she was also not directly mentioned. It was simply not considered appropriate. ***This narrative was begun by the Duke of York & Warwick and was - demonstrably - already widespread by the end of 1460. When Edward IV came to power, there seems to have been a slight shift in how he spoke of Henry (he referred to Henry as their "great enemy and adversary"; his envoys were clearly willing to acknowledge Henry's role in Lancastrian resistance to Yorkist rule; etc), but he nevertheless continued the former narrative for the most part. I think this was because 1) it was already well-established and widespread by his father, and 2) downplaying Henry's authority would have served to emphasize Edward's own kingship, which was probably advantageous for a usurper whose deposed rival was still alive and out of reach. In some sense, the Lancastrians did the same thing with their own propaganda across the 1460s, which was clearly not as effective in terms of garnering support and is too long to get into right now, but was still very relevant when it came to emphasizing their own right to the throne while disparaging the Yorkists' claim.
#henry vi#my post#wars of the roses#margaret of anjou#Look I’m not trying to argue that Henry VI was secretly some kind of Perfect King™ whose only misfortune was to be targeted by the Yorkists#That is...obviously pushing it and obviously not true#Henry was very imperfect; he did make lots of errors and haphazard/unpopular decisions; and he did ultimately lose/concede defeat#in both the Hundred Years War and the subsequent Wars of the Roses.#He was also clearly less effective than his predecessor and successor (who unfortunately happened to be his father and usurper respectively#and that comparison will always affect our view of his kingship. It's inevitable and in some sense understandable.#But it's hardly fair to simply accept and parrot the Yorkist narrative of him being a “puppet of a king”.#Henry *did* have agency and he was demonstrably involved in the events around him#From sponsoring alchemists to issuing proclamations to participating in trials against the Yorkists (described in the 1459 attainder)#We also know that he was involved in administration though it seems as though he was being heavily advised/handheld by his councilors#That may be the grain of truth which the Yorkists' image of him was based on.#But regardless of Henry's aptitude he was clearly *involved* in ruling#Just like he was involved in plots against Yorkist rule in the early 1460s before he was captured.#And he did have some successes! For example in 1456 he travelled to Chester and seems to have been responsible#for reconciling Nicholas ap Gruffyd & his sons to the crown and granting them a general pardon.#Bizarrely Ralph Griffiths has credited Margaret for this even though there is literally no evidence that she was involved.#We don't even know if she travelled with Henry and the patent rolls offering the pardon never mention her.#Griffiths seems to have simply assumed that it was Margaret's doing because of 1) his own assumption that she was entirely in control#while Henry was entirely passive and 2) because it (temporarily) worked against Yorkist interests.#It's quite frustrating because this one of the most probable examples we have of Henry's own participation in ruling in the late 1450s#But as usual his involvement is ignored :/#Also all things considered:#The verdict on Henry's kingship may not have been so damning if his rule hadn't been opposed or if the Lancastrians had won the war?#Imo it's doubtful he would be remembered very well (his policies re the HYW and the economic problems of that time were hardly ideal)#but I think it's unlikely that he would have been remembered as a 'failed king' / antithesis of ideal kingship either#Does this make sense? (Henry VI experts please chime in because I am decidedly not one lol)
12 notes · View notes
starsapphire · 1 year
Text
ok wait when does kon start aging again... by the time geoff johns has his hands on kon he’s written as getting older (like explicitly stated he’s aging in tt/o secret files) but did johns just forget/ignore the being-16-forever thing or am i forgetting some event that made him start aging again
8 notes · View notes
patchesjam · 1 year
Note
thank you so much for the pc advice!! im such a baby with all this but noticed this one maybe? do u think it’d be good for the stuff i want? (minecraft/sims/valo games like that)
https://www.pcspecialist.co.uk/view/Aero-Master/
i would say that is absolutely a reasonable computer, probably do the job absolutely fine!
however, if you can spare a little bit more, i would perhaps reccomend the i5 processor over the i3, i think its ~$30 more but i think that might bottleneck you a bit otherwise - but the i3 which you currently have would probably work fine if you want to keep it :)
I would also probably strongly suggest you maybe consider changing the graphics card? the 8GB NVIDIA GEFORCE RTX 3050 looks like its actually cheaper, than the one currently suggested and has 3GB more memory which might be useful for minecraft and valo :)
only other thing to consider is perhaps the cooling, im finding it a little hard to understand but i would be a bit worried with only 1*120mm fan it wouldn't be enough. I would perhaps reccomend 2*120mm fans here, otherwise you run the risk of overheating. so perhaps the CORSAIR H100I ELITE RGB CPU COOLER ? it is a bit more expensive though at about £50 more, so up to you absolutely!!
looks like a really good choice though, and pretty good value for money even if you didnt change anything :) any more questions or queries go ahead
4 notes · View notes
gender-euphowrya · 1 year
Text
people who like. actually use chatgoopt to learn shit are wild as hell like.
imagine you're playing a video game and one of the enemies is trying to run to you but they get stuck in a doorway and you're just staring at them running in place and struggling to figure out that they need to go a different way, and thinking "this guy should make big decisions for me"
4 notes · View notes
montymollusk · 2 years
Text
okay so i’m neither a bird expert nor a thermodynamics expert but. i feel like i remember vaguely from reading animorphs that birds fly mainly by coasting on warm air to conserve energy
if that’s true, could a dragon generate its own warm air by breathing fire underneath itself, and just coast on that infinitely?
8 notes · View notes
mindblowingscience · 6 months
Text
A type of flu virus that used to sicken people every year hasn't been spotted anywhere on Earth since March 2020. As such, experts have advised that the apparently extinct viruses be removed from next year's flu vaccines. The now-extinct viruses were a branch of the influenza B family tree known as the Yamagata lineage. Scientists first reported the apparent disappearance of Yamagata viruses in 2021. At that time, experts speculated that precautions taken to stop the spread of COVID-19 — such as masking and social distancing — had not only driven the overall number of flu cases to historic lows but may have completely snuffed out this type of flu virus. 
Continue Reading.
21K notes · View notes
astrosage1 · 2 months
Text
For more information about Vastu Color remedies Consultant in India, Vastu Expert Near Me, Professional Vastu Consultant in Delhi, Vastu Adviser on Call, Top 4 Vastu Consultants in Delhi, Vastu Consultant, please visit the — https://aclmarts.in/
0 notes
Text
May 13, 2024
Ms Renaud: Given that in 2022 the Alberta Ombudsman clearly outlined barriers Albertans face when they use the appeal process for social benefits like AISH, given the appeal process is laced with barriers for disabled Albertans such as a lack of process to request an accommodation, lack of ASL support, lack of legal support and preparation, plain-language translation – I could go on and on. The assistive technology sucks, too. Will the minister please tell disabled Albertans why the UCP government is ignoring the Ombudsman recommendations from two reports?
Mr. Nixon: Well, again, Mr. Speaker, the Ombudsman is entitled to his opinion. We’ve looked at his report. The Ombudsman is not in charge of policy; the government is. We are confident in our policy.
0 notes
creature-wizard · 2 months
Text
Since folks are exhausted from hearing about Project 2025 and Agenda 47, here are some reasons to feel hopeful about Harris
(It would be wonderful if folks could reblog this, a lot of people are feeling very discouraged right now and could use the morale boost!)
12K notes · View notes
noballoonsinspace · 7 months
Text
anyone handy at plumbing and willing to give some insight?
How much should it cost to have a water valve replaced? Was unhooking a washer/dryer but one of the valves was corroded and broke off completely, so we cannot hook up another one until that’s replaced. What is an appropriate cost range for that? I do not trust anyone profiting from it to give this information accurately tbh. I don’t want to sound stingy, I do not possess any plumbing skills and all labor is skilled labor and plumbers deserve to be paid decently for their work just like everyone else. But for example if the new parts are $100 and it only takes an hour, I don’t want to be charged $1,000. I don’t want to be exploited for the urgency of the situation. Y’know?
Also if it turns out I can’t afford it and I enjoy power tools, is it the kind of thing I could do myself??
Huge thanks in advance for any help
1 note · View note
medicalinjury · 8 months
Text
Tumblr media
In Australia, the publicity surrounding medical negligence cases is influenced by various factors. While some cases receive significant public attention, others remain private or less known. The level of publicity often hinges on factors such as the nature of the case, the parties involved, and the scope of litigation.
1 note · View note
ker-partage · 9 months
Video
youtube
CAT Alert! 5 Life Hacks That Will Save Your Christmas Tree from Feline D...
0 notes
prommethium · 11 months
Text
Sci-fi is a hit or miss. Not to be pretentious, but knowing a thing or two either makes me roll my eyes and toss away the piece of media, or hold it close to my chest.
My current read is making me lose my 💩
Listen, like most people I like to question everything and develop ideas or critics by myself (not something I read somewhere) I'm not an expert in many topics, but I'm always looking closely to science and politics. READING THIS WORK MADE ME REALISE THAT THERE IS A POLITICAL COMPONENT IN THE SCIENCE TAUGHT AT UNIVERSITIES. Yes, we study ethics, environmental policies etc., but what is developed follows what scientists believe, appealing not only to the moral components but to the rest of the ideas that make up his philosophy and ethics. Their impressions on society and their conception of the future are a fundamental part of where they direct their efforts. In some areas of science the influence of a political or economic approach is evident. Such like computer science where the development of certain algorithmic models and app development have become a cornerstone for researchers. But in some others, what can be understood as "curiosity" and "pursuing to understand the world around us" can be whims and perpetration of certain ideas that damage people and the world around us under the pretty disguise of science.
0 notes
sayruq · 4 months
Text
US State Department falsified report to claim Israel 'not blocking Gaza aid'
The state department falsified a report earlier this month to absolve Israel of responsibility for blocking humanitarian aid flows into Gaza, overruling the advice of its own experts, according to a former senior US official who resigned this week. Stacy Gilbert left her post as senior civil military adviser in the state department’s bureau of population, refugees and migration, on Tuesday. She had been one of the department’s subject matter experts who drafted the report mandated under national security memorandum 20 (NSM-20) and published on 10 May. The NSM-20 report found that it was “reasonable to assess” that Israel had used US weapons in a way that was “inconsistent” with international humanitarian law, but that there was not enough concrete evidence to link specific US-supplied weapons to violations. Even more controversially, the report said the state department did not “currently assess that the Israeli government is prohibiting or otherwise restricting the transport or delivery of US humanitarian assistance” in Gaza. It was a high-stakes judgment because under a clause in the Foreign Assistance Act, the US would be obliged to cut arms sales and security assistance to any country found to have blocked delivery of US aid. Gilbert, a 20-year veteran of the state department who has worked in several war zones, said that report’s conclusion went against the overwhelming view of state department experts who were consulted on the report. She said there was general agreement that while other factors impeded the flow of aid into Gaza at a time when famine has begun to take hold of its 2.3 million population – such as lack of security, caused by Hamas, Israeli military operations and the desperation of Palestinians to find food – it was clear that Israel was playing a role in limiting the amount of food and medical supplies crossing the border into Gaza. “There is consensus among the humanitarian community on that. It is absolutely the opinion of the humanitarian subject matter experts in the state department, and not just in my bureau – people who look at this from the intelligence community and from other bureaus. I would be very hard pressed to think of anyone who has said [Israeli obstruction] is not an issue,” Gilbert said. “That’s why I object to that report saying that Israel is not blocking humanitarian assistance. That is patently false.”
4K notes · View notes