#Cite your sources

[charmee-silly]

“studies have shown”

WHAT STUDIES, WHO CONDUCTED THEM, WHERE ARE THEIR RESULTS, CITE YOUR SOURCES

[ambxtxo]

Sorry to post politics on main, but some of you pro-palestine people are missing the point when it comes to the US election.

At this point, there is really no alternative to voting for Kamala. RFK is not getting elected. Trump would be infinitely worse for the Israel-Palestine conflict (as well as other conflicts! and our well-being in general).

Stop virtue signaling and actually do something (vote) so that America can have a better leader than Trump. That’s all. We’re not voting for our next Messiah, we’re not voting between two perfect angels, it’s a US presidential election.

And those of you saying that Kamala is “committing genocide” really need to get things into perspective. The Vice President does not have the power to furnish weapons to Israel. Israel’s prime minister is acting in direct defiance of the Biden/Harris administration’s wishes and Harris has been the most vocal in asking for a ceasefire.

The Palestine conflict is not an excuse to not vote. Not voting makes it likely that Trump will win, history will go on whether you play a part or not. I want my reproductive rights back. Please.

[grungebutsoft]

thank god for hbomberguy I’m now motivated to actually write my research paper and cite every. Single. Source as pettily as I can. It’s due in two days I can do this

[spheresr4cubes]

In case anyone wants to boycott #45's donors, here's a list:

If anyone finds secondary or contradictory sources, please feel free to add-on!

Edit: Wow, page not found. Here's a screenshot.

[underachieverse]

"Cite your sources" sir your trust issues are not my headache

[korovaoverlook]

seeing all of these citation memes during finals week is giving me whiplash. y'all have no idea how fervently i have been checking my bibliographies and footnotes for mistakes

[tales-from-systok]

Systoker: I used sources on my very sketchy and largely inaccurate document which was toootally used by medical professionals

Comments: Omg this person is right cause they used sources

Another, way smaller systoker: hey you didn’t cite them or say anywhere what the sources were you just said you used “sources” which is like really vague-

Bigger systoker: wow look at this person stop being anti-science and silencing abuse survivors go give them hate

Comments: bigger systoker is right they used sources!

Small systoker gets garrased off the internet and bigger systoker is pleased

And later it came out their sources didn’t even talk about 90% of what was in the document they were on the topic but discussed different stuff than what was on the document. Also when they finally cited their sources they were inaccessible unless you were actively in high school or college

Seen it far too many times..

[kimyoonmiauthor]

So... Roman Plays didn't even have acts except the tragedies? Maybe.

Following up on a source. Personally, I find this super hilarious. (Not in the ridicule way...) Because this would make Aelius Donatus very wrong, and then the professors that insisted that Aelius Donatus was arguing for three acts even more wrong.

Aelius Donatus reads like a man with a huge ego, so I kinda think this would be a blow to his ego...

Didn't I say check your sources?

Yeah, check your sources and your sources' sources, if you can.

How Aelius Donatus is wrong and then gotten wrong is like a summary of my whole project on the myth of the 3-act and five-act in one figure.

If I can confirm this in full with historical detail, BTW, I'm 100% adding the story structures to the book.

I'm super amused at seeing story structure change over time this much.

Aelius Donatus falls apart with the first hurdle--checking if what he asserted was true about the Greeks.

The reason you want to cite your sources is not only the backtrace, but also when you get something wrong, which is likely, you aren't blamed. Instead, you'll more likely blamed for citing a bad source, rather than being a complete asshat that makes up shit.

Maybe if more professors put it that way, more people would be inclined to do citations. People are always on academic consequences, but never what problems it causes for scholars to not cite things properly.

[kwistowee]

Guys, I am so serious: I see you reposting my gifs, artwork, or creations OR someone else’s gifs, artwork, or creations, and I will block you immediately! I operate on a zero-tolerance theft policy.

[petit-papillion]

Giving credit to original posters, creators, artists, photographers, and sources matters.

It matters to the person who put in the time and effort to create the content. Whether it's finding that photo and editing it to make it stand out. Or downloading that video, editing it, coloring it, turning it into a gif, adding subtitles, etc. Regardless of what you do (job/student), I'm sure you too would not like it if someone else takes credit for your work.

It matters to people who want to know context. Was it said by a fan, your favourite's bestie, a reputable journalist? Published by a tabloid or the New York Times? From last week or last year? Is it an original, or did someone get photoshopped in for a meme?

It matters to people who may want to explore more content of that particular publication, so they will continue to publish top-notch articles. Or give kudos to a budding artist for their outstanding art work, potentially encouraging them to create more. Or compliment that photographer on capturing their fave in just the right light.

It matters, because even though it may take you an extra minute or so to add on that name or link, it is the right thing to do.

[queerasaurus-rexx]

Citing Your Sources; For People Who Aren't English Majors

in light of an absolutely bomb (haha) video dropping online

let me show you a very quick and easy way to cite your sources for a youtube video, because we don't all know mla format, and that's ok.

you can use any kind of online document software (google docs, pastebin etc.)

in no particular order, though it is good form to list primary or main sources first;

SOURCE [article, book or documentary], AUTHOR/DIRECTOR

link to source [can be linked to source name if software allows]

[timecode] 'quote or passage cited'

[timecode] 'quote or passage cited'

moreover, you can include an asterisk * in the actual video to let your viewers know a portion or passage is in your source links.

[copperbora]

Introduction

Here be mine list of information sources that I often use for arguing with people who genocidally hate wolves (and other wildlife,) based on misinformation, anti-wolf propaganda like 'Smoke a Pack a Day!' (yes, wolf haters literally say inflammatory hogwash like this,) and centuries of uneducated fear based upon the very few times in history (actual accounts forgotten) that (likely largely habituated) wolves have been less than friendly to humans. (And I was going to include a picture of one of these 'smoke a pack a day' things but urgh... honestly they make me want to vomit.)

🐾Please note that I will be constantly adding to this list and updating it as I find new ammunition - er, sources, with which to argue with/informationally support my ongoing work on my science-based graphic novel, Knife Edge. (Which production is a bit slow on at the moment because I am spending most of my time outside.)

⚠️Important to note: wolf scientists can be a bit hard to talk to at times due to the fact that some of them have literally received death threats from wolf haters and people in the livestock industries who erronously believe based upon hearsay (i.e. no actual science,) that wolves are a threat to their top dollar. That's why the typically great podcast Ologies had trouble finding a wolf scientist for its lupinology episode - because people who hate wolves tend to hate people who say that they need to stop killing wolves because how dare they be wrong. (I'm still peeved about how bad that lupinology episode was by the way; it didn't even mention trophic cascades. Sigh. (That's why I haven't linked it here, and why I hope that Alie Ward will redo it someday, or that the podcast Science Versus will do a wolf episode instead someday.)

I myself am not a wolf scientist, (although this was my dream as a little girl which I gave up on due to painful dyscalcula,) but I am striving to be as expert about lupinology as much as a non-scientist can be, especially so that I can do wolves proper justice in my story Knife Edge as well as other future wolf advocacy projects that are percolating in my deranged little mind. My stunningly crappy brain for math may have prevented me from studying to become an actual wildlife biologist studying wolves in the field but it isn't going to stop me from helping wolves with my art by attempting to educate and dispel misinformation about them. I can do my best to be a science communicator and do wolf outreach through my work. Hopefully I won't get lynched for it.

Please feel free to use the following links should you decide that you need them. This post is linked in my pinned post so that it can be more easily found especially by me.

Why I Advocate for Wolves

- Because it's the right thing to do: wolves are sentient, highly social beings who live in closely knit family groups much like our own human families complete with parents who impart generational knowledge - such as tactically how to specifically hunt particular prey (for example: elk) - upon their offspring who either go off eventually to start their own families or stay put in their natal pack with their parents, helping to raise their younger siblings. No animal has been more horrifically scapegoated over the centuries of our coexistence than the wolf, which some people are still trying to eradicate even though no science supports this.

- Because I dream of a world where predators are protected, where all killing of them is banned, because they are simply too important to our planet to destroy. They are deeply critical to rewilding our planet and helping our own species survive, because where wolves are, wetlands and forests thrive, helping cure drought, prevent wildfires, facilitate natural carbon capture through the bettering of these ecosystems, and clean the water that we humans also drink, all by preventing cervid species like deer from overgrazing and destroying baby trees. Wolves cause trophic cascades which promote the survival of hundreds of other species from charismatic scavengers like bald eagles and red foxes to the freshwater trout that anglers love to catch whose health is aided by the beavers which are able to create expansive water meadows whenever deer are prevented by predators like wolves from eating all of the beavers' food.

- Because unshockingly, killing wolves greatly damages their genetic diversity, hindering their ability to survive as a species. (I can't believe that there are actually people surprised by this.)

- Because before we ruined everything, the presence of wolves and lack of human interference meant that pre-colonial biodiversity was unimagineably greater than what we see today and I for one would like to see this amazing biodiversity explode again within my lifetime.

- Because wolves and humans have a lot in common; they too mourn their dead and exhibit joy at the introduction of new babies to their families. Recognizing this isn't anthropomorphism; we too are animals, afterall.

"We have doomed the wolf not for what it is, but for what we deliberately and mistakenly perceive it to be – the mythologized epitome of a savage ruthless killer – which is, in reality, no more than a reflected image of ourself.” - Farley Mowat, Never Cry Wolf.

🐺Wolf Specific Citations

- Wolves as scapegoats for human evil.

- No statistical support for wolf 'control' (culling) and maternal penning as methods for helping endangered caribou in British Columbia. (Actually, erase the word culling - what they really mean is wolf genocide.)

- The plight of wolves in America (features an absolute textwall of citations!)

- New document suggests British Columbia is using Judas Wolves for aerial wolf cull.

- Account of use of Judas Wolves in British Columbia

- BC Wolf Cull: documents reveal cruel methods of killing wolves. (You can bet your butt that I am furious at my province for this.)

- Wolves do not require human 'help' to control their numbers.

- Wolves are extremely important for environmental health as they cause trophic cascades.

- A wolf, abruptly noticing a human, runs away in fear. (Example of typical human/wolf interaction.)

- Are wolves dangerous to humans? (Spoiler alert: they're statistically not.)

- Killing wolves is unnecessary: wolves naturally limit their own numbers.

- Wolves are not a significant threat to livestock. What is a genuine threat to livestock generally? Free roaming dogs (in fact, farmers in Scotland are allowed to outright shoot dogs who they notice bothering their animals,) dystocia (birthing complications,) and inclement weather - issues which could be aleviated at least a little if ranchers would just use some range riders - aka, cowboys.

- US government data shows that wolves have a negligible effect on livestock losses.

- Killing wolves actually leads to more livestock losses, not less.

- Alberta Rancher Using Non-Lethal Predator Control (hasn't 'had' to shoot a wolf in years.)

- Livestock Guardian Dogs Reduce Losses by 11-100% (utilized correctly they are extremely effective!)

- Livestock Guardian Dogs Reduce Predation (according to Texas A&M University.)

- Please note that the wolf ranking terms 'alpha/beta/omega' have been debunked and are no longer in reputable scientific use. I wrote a thing about it here. Wolf packs are families, not militant groups of marauding monsters.

- All about why we don't use the wolf ranking terms alpha/beta/omega anymore which is why I depict Larch's natal pack in Knife Edge without these terms.

Recommended Books & Films About Wolves

- The Homeward Wolf by Kevin Van Tighem (a great account of wolf behaviour including detailing how wolves have generational knowledge and typically only hunt what their elders have taught them to except in rare circumstances such as in the case of a melanistic male in the Canadian Rockies who started hunting mountain goats instead of the elk that he had been raised on.)

- The Last Wolf by Jim Crumley (goes over the extirpation of the wolf from Scotland and over the misinformation surrounding wolves in great detail; an inspiring read.)

- In the Shadow of a Rainbow by Robert Franklin Leslie (a novel telling the story of a remarkable friendship between a man and a wild wolf which also gives evidence to lupine pre-genocide culture.)

- Island of the Sea Wolves published and streamed by Netflix, which gives an interesting account of a wolf family that has two breeding females in it, who amazingly help each other raise their pups!

- The International Wolf Centre's wonderfully long list of wolf books and media. (Doesn't include everything though.)

- Wild Horses, Wild Wolves by Maureen Enns (an account with tonnes of beautiful photos of wildies - the Canadian version of a mustang - and wolves - living peacefully together in Alberta, Canada's foothills. The wolves hunt elk and ignore the horses who tolerate the presence of the wolves. A great example of generational knowledge on the wolves' part as their ancestors taught them to hunt elk, not horses, so they eat elk.)

Other Wildlife Citations (Mostly About Cougars, Honestly.)

As a wildlife advocate you have to pick your battles so most of my focus is on predators, particularly wolves, cougars, coyotes, and sharks with a small measure of focus on spotted hyenas. I do also have a soft spot for beavers, however, as they are personally sacred to me and also extremely important to the environment, being an unusual keystone species that is a herbivore rather than a predator. Generally predators are the most influential animals in a habitat but beavers - and bison - are novel exceptions. (And actually, squirrels are too. Every animal is an important facet however without natural predators ecosystems crumble. Humans are not a replacement; compared to predators like wolves humans typically do an outlandishly terrible job of positively influencing the ecosystem.)

- The importance of predators (many more useful citations!)

- Why We NEED Predators (ScienceNews)

- Unmasking the myth of wildlife 'management.' (Yet more citations.)

- USDA's war on wildlife (again super well cited!)

- Cougars are NOT a threat to public safety (and more facts about these adorable large dog-sized purr machines.)

- Cougars also cause trophic cascades (in fact many predators do this.)

- Cougars are actually extremely social.

- Cougars are TERRIFIED of human chatter!

- Cougars are the bigfoot of cats. (Also as they are technically 'small' cats - and they honestly are very small compared to actual pantherine big cats like tigers and lions - we need to stop calling them big cats.)

- Want to solve wildfires and drought? Leave it to BEAVERS!

- How beavers restore wetland in deserts.

- Coyotes under siege and misunderstood.

- Why killing coyotes doesn't work.

- Starving bear mercifully euthanized; autopsy reveals plastic impaction in its intestines.

- Disease precautions for hunters.

- The ecological effects of livestock guarding dogs (LGDs) on target and non-target wildlife.

- Impact of clear-cut logging on forests.

- Ojibwe Spirit Horse - here before colonization? Plausible, yes considering horse remains found in the arctic.

- Is shark repellent a real thing? (Yes it is, and it's being developed in modern times to save sharks from humans.)

- To underline how very little top predators want to hurt us much less eat us, watch this video to see a tiger shark (one of the most infamous species of shark,) happily cuddle with her human researcher friend and recognize him after not seeing him for years!

Other Wildlife Books & Films

- Lethal Control, produced by Predator Defense (an organization which does an amazing job of thoroughly listing their information sources) and is a film about M-44 cyanide bombs which kill wildlife and pets alike.

- American Coyote by Dan Flores (be warned, some of the information in regards to wolves is incorrect but it is still an extremely interesting and illuminating account of the coyote, Canis latrans.)

- California Mountain Lions: The Legends of California by One Health Institute (ecology of cougars and why they are threatened.)

- The consequences of sport hunting - hundreds of cougar kittens die by orphaning every year. (Hunting predators is NOT sustainable!)

Favourite Information Sources & Organizations to Support

- Predator Defense

- International Wolf Centre

- Wolf Conservation Centre

- The Fur-Bearers

- Raincoast Conservation Foundation

- Northern Lights Wildlife Wolf Centre

- MountainLion.org

My Silly(?) Pet Peeves About Wolves

- How many Etsy stores flatout copy that silhouette of Kiba from Wolf's Rain howling with the moon behind him in their designs. Damnit, learn how to draw!!

- The whole moon association with wolves - no, they do not howl at the moon, they howl because it's fun, to communicate where they are/where prey is, to mourn, to locate family members, to express hunt victory (or alternatively "Come and get it!") Wolves probably do not give a damn about the moon.

- When people call baby wolves 'cubs' instead of 'pups' or 'puppies.' No. Wolves are a species of wild dog and baby dogs are puppies, therefore baby wolves are also puppies. Grr. 'Cub' to me implies a baby bear, or, heaven forbid, a pantherine kitten like a baby lion or tiger. Maybe hyenas too.

- Wolf haters, and how ludicrous it is that they've made something so simple so political. Wolves, like human uteruses, should not be political.

- Trophy hunters.

- How every wolf story is extremely fantastical instead of based upon any science.

- How no company ever makes accurately patterned wolf plushies. Even fellow artists mess this up and it's kinda heartbreaking for me; most notably giving wolf plushies a white tail tip instead of a black one. Wolves are not foxes: white tail tips are extremely rare wolf markings! Most of the time the 'white' tail tip is just the result of a black wolf going silver as they age.

- How cartoon wolves rarely look at all like real wolves.

- The fact that their common name is 'grey' wolf when at least in North America they commonly come in black too. I propose 'timber' wolf as a much more accurate name, as they are usually found in forests.

My Silly(?) Pet Peeves About Other Wildlife

- Trophy hunters. Please find a different way to prove that you have disposable income and that you are manly.

- When people call cougars/pumas 'mountain lions' because cougars are only very distantly related to real lions - they're on opposite sides of Felidae. Their closest relatives are jaguarundi, followed by cheetahs. Lions belong to Panthera along with tigers and leopards while cougars belong to the genus Puma. Additionally, cougars and puma are indigenous names while mountain lion is colonial. (Pumas are found in South America, cougars live in North America; same species but different subspecies due to differing habitats and prey.) 'Cougar' is derived from an indigenous Tupi (Brazil) word, çuçuarana.

- When people misuse the word 'cougar' to describe women. Ugh. Stop.

- The name 'black bear' because black bears come in a whole rainbow of colours including white (spirit/kermode,) glacier (it's like blue roan for bears,) cinnamon, blonde and chocolate.

[lafamilledelioncourt]

Go into education they said....

Young adults/older teens are different they said...

[marmota-b]

Woman's suit / costume, c. 1910, Czechia. Silk. Uměleckoprůmyslové muzeum v Praze / Museum of Decorative Arts Prague, ID: 57051

One of my favourites, this one. It looks pretty yet practical. I love that it appears to have a wrap skirt (probably mock wrap, but still). I love the cut of the jacket. Look at those lovely curves. Look at the pockets in that curved seam!!!

(Not sure if the whole thing really is silk, or if the online listing just missed all other materials.)

[kimyoonmiauthor]

Found a connection from Percy Lubbock to Lester Ward, one of the two progenitors of Conflict Theory

Because people keep harping on the idea that conflict always was in stories, but I also needed to find out where Percy Lubbock got his idea that Conflict should be at the center of stories. Here:

Lester F. Ward is one of the two main progenitors of conflict theory in sociology. My question was how did Percy Lubbock find it, and is Conflict theory as Lester Ward defines it the same as it is today. So, we can find from this page in The making of sociology : a study of sociological theory by Fletcher, Ronald (1971) that Lester Ward was criticizing the work of Sir John Lubbock. Sir John Lubbock is this one: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Lubbock,_1st_Baron_Avebury

He was interested, as Percy Lubbock's grandfather in archaeology and theory.

screen shot from here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Percy_Lubbock It is not outlandish for someone to say, Hey this guy is talking about your grandfather in his new books, or Percy Lubbock himself to be interested in the books. This also gives a throughline to Death of the Author and making Barthes out as being a plagiarist. Because in Death of the Author, Barthes goes on about "primitive man" which Lubbock didn't do, but that Ward does do.

Barthes, in turn, could read and understand English. So the missing reference, because Ward wrote in English and did talk about material accumulation like Barthes referenced, is Ward. I score. Inductive reasoning, probably. But highly plausible it was backtracked like so, most likely. So theoretically, Barthes was a HUGE fan of Virginia Woolf, he traces back, finds Lubbock in Woolf's writings (public interviews), reads Lubbock's work, backtracks this conflict theory, ends up with Ward, thus makes the side reference to Ward's ideas about civilization, which, BTW, by the time he wrote was kinda out of date. I'm going to see if I can find the whole Indians thing Barthes wrote about in Ward's work, if so, it's a slam dunk. I can then prove that Barthes most likely did read Lubbock's work, and he didn't come up with "Death of the Author" independently. I've been questioning all this time where it came from, and apparently it's this third figure everyone triangulated on. Geeze, I don't understand why people didn't do this earlier though. Worshiping people who don't do citations doesn't do anyone good. BTW, this does not mean Barthes didn't add to Lubbock's thesis one bit, but I do dislike people refusing to do citations and taking credit for other people's work in doing so. Mild CW on Lester F. Ward: There is some maybe unintentional racism? Ethnocentricism wasn't coined until 1906 and both of Ward's books mentioned here were written before that date. And his last book written was 1908.

BTW, Lester F. Ward, I think he was trying to be a decent human being and transform his trauma into doing better for the world around him. But it is a chore to read his books on sociology since there is a lot that is wrong, strangely right, deadass wrong because there were no studies, and urrk when it came to civilization (such as his ideas about evolution of societies.) So, while he uses words that are yeeted from sociology today, like primitive and savage, at the same time, he didn't have the breath of physical anthropology at his disposal, and didn't know about homo sapiens in particular being a same species from what I can gather. 1900's was rough that way. So not a fan of the work, but I kinda like his social work. As, always, humans are complicated, and we cannot always say that a human should be polarized as all good or bad.

[commodorez]

Photography

Most of the content presented on my blog is reblogged from others, which is pulled from somewhere else on the web.

However, when you see me posting a photograph, 99% of the time, that's a photo I took. Once in awhile it's taken using a DSLR, but the vast majority are simply cellphone photos. There might be a photo or two shot on film somewhere in the mix, but I haven't posted one of those in a long time.

Occasionally I post a screen capture, but that isn't too common for me. The exception is when I use a modern computer to do video capture on an old computer's video signal.

Once in a blue moon I will make a post of my own with someone else's pictures or screenshots, but I usually say when that's the case, and hopefully where it came from.