#zoosadism

[rights4allmeansall]

times when it’s hard to remain a non-violent person:

1. when researching paras & finding a paper trying to tie zoophilia to being autistic

like hello??? & the paper says they couldn’t find any other such claims… gee i wonder why😐 i’m ab to start doing my own studies & writing my own papers because- sigh.

update: found another ab some boy in sri lanka that literally says “this is extremely rare” okay so why write an entire paper connecting it then.

update 2: “ADHD causes paras” yeah alright.

[pizzaback]

people are right to criticize the youtuber who was sharing autopsy photos on her patreon but every time i heard the bare summary of it i’m kind of suprised it’s not plagued moth being talked about, cause he’s been doing this kind of thing for ages

[sheloveshersunglassesafterdark]

I might not have been extensively physically abused, but I was exposed to CP and Zoosadist content first hand by actual perverts as a kid.

[terapagosu]

Having this “take” is like a giant neon sign pointing right at you that lets everyone around you know that you’re allergic to research and that you’re willing to spread misinformation if it caters to the make-believe world you so desperately force yourself to believe in. This is one of the more embarrassing takes on Tumblr in regards to vegans.

I understand that research can be hard, so I’ve compiled a few simple questions you can google yourself to not sound completely clueless:

Vegan leather

Most common method of tanning leather

Effects of chrome tanning to the human body

Effects of chrome tanning to the environment

Is chrome tanned leather biodegradable

The implication of this “take” is, of course, that vegan leather = plastic. If you googled the 1st thing on my list of basic things to research you’d very quickly learn that this isn’t true and that vegans can get pretty imaginative with their eco-friendly products. Also, plastic clothing is not marketed to vegans in particular – it’s targeted to people who can’t afford better materials. Are you seriously telling me that none of your clothes are made of plastic? Are you telling me that you expect the poor to buy expensive leather clothing, even if it was sustainable (which it is not)?

Whilst a lack of research and blatant propaganda is uncommon amongst vegans – people who’ve changed their entire lifestyles to better with their ethical values –, it is the norm with the rest of the population. This whole vegan leather “conversation” is a good example of that.

And of course if anyone actually talked with vegans they’d know that the majority of us don’t even buy vegan leather or pleather. And that the majority of pleather owned by vegans are made of recycled materials. But people are terrified of listening to us because they’re opposed to learning anything that conflicts with their personal wishes, ie. that vegans are evil and that the majority of us are white vegans(™) and that we don't actually think about the ecological side of things. It’s pathetic.

my best friend linen my brother in arms cotton my partner wool my beautiful sister silk

[yuri-for-businesswomen]

#notallmen but somehow its always men who commit gang rape, often filming the torture, sometimes even murdering the victim; even if the victim is a fucking lizard they killed and ate after the act. most men dont do stuff like this but somehow its men when an orang utan gets prostituted or when videos of unspeakable animal abuse get exchanged in secret furry chats (look up kero the wolf on your own discretion). most men are horrified by these acts - allegedly - but cant explain why its almost exclusively men committing these truly unspeakable acts. #notallmen but the nth room case in south korea was organised and the videos consumed by men.

when men and women are equally capable of evil acts - which anti feminists dont tire to remind us of - then how come that for every heinous act a woman commits, men have done it more often and more violent? and that there are violent acts women tend to not commit at all, specifically gang rape, necrophilia and zoosadism? does this not tell you something about the inherently different predisposition that is being male, having a penis to rape with? not all men do, but all men could, and all men see other men doing it. think about that

[inuette]

Official (Anti) RQ Archive

[PT: Official (Anti) Radqueer Archive. END PT. ]

　Last Updated (DD/MM/YY): 08/01/24. This archive will be updated over time, so make sure to check back regularly if you can! If you have anxiety regarding opening links, no worries! All these posts are archived under our "archived" & resources tags.

Anti-RQ Terms/Flags

'PRAT' meaning

'Fluffy Para'

'Arissomei'/'Arissodic'

'Atypical Dysphoria Awareness' (Creator Boundary)

Reclaimed Transage, Transracial (Adoptee), Transspecies and Transabled Flags

Reclaimed Transabled Flag 2 + Symbol

BIID Flag + Symbol

Parahealth

RQ Terms/Flags

'Faux Cult'/'Fult' and Flags

Xenoanarchism

Other Terms

Doc

PSAs

Radparas

'Kandiqueer'

'Xenosatanism' and Xenosatanist Flags

'@//sophieinwonderland'

The Angel's Web "Fult"

'Not All Radqueers'

Initial 'Fult' PSA

"The Ezra Files" (Content/Trigger Warning: (Pro-C) Pedophilia, Incest, Bestiality, Zoosadism, Toddler/Baby Abuse, Grooming, CSEM Trading, Rape, Abduction, Admissions Of CSA, Admissions Of Incest, Admissions Of Bestiality…)

TransN*zi Symbols

Other Resources

What IS A Radqueer? Why Are They Bad?

RQ Original Coining Info

RQs are a Cult

RQs and Stochastic Terrorism

The Insult of 'Cisdisabled'

BIID and RQ Grooming

RQ '2024 Calendar'

Talk of Atypical Dysphoria

WHY Misuse of Transrace and the term 'Trace' are Bad

Talk of "Transautism"/being "Transautistic"

You Cannot 'Coin' A Medical Disorder/Talk of "MUDs"

Intrusive Thoughts About =/= Actually Believing in Them

'I have intrusive thoughts about ...' isn't a 'Valid' Excuse

Transitioning When It Comes To TransIDs and TransX Identities

Transethnic People Aren't Valid (Focuses on East Asians & Koreans)

There Are Better Ways to Cope with Atypical Dysphoria

Why Arissomei/Arissodic is its Own Term

Racial Hierarchy and Being "Trace"/"Transracial"

Blackface is Blackface — Your "Intent" Doesn't Matter

Alternative (Non-TERF Rhetoric) Anti-Radqueer Arguments

Suibaiting Radqueers ISN'T Okay

If You're Thinking of Leaving the RQ Community

'Cracker' is Not a Slur

Suibaiting RQs isn't Welcome Here

Radinclus does NOT Mean Radqueer

Misusage of Languages in RQ Spaces

How-To's

Reporting a RQ for Inciting Violence

(Fighting Against) RQs Rebranding Terms as 'RQ Terms'

Coping with Atypical Dysphoria

Getting Out and Staying Out Of the Community

General Tips

Reaffirmation

Reaffirmation of Why RQs are Bad (TWs included in the post)

BIID (Body Integrity Identity Disorder) =/= Radqueer (Affirmation)

[soaara]

can we start treating zoosads like people and not like they're evil monsters just for having thoughts which they can't control .

[futomimi]

Editing this post since the blogs of Ezra's that went down were so kindly reinstated. Staff is siding with a pedophile zoophile who hosts a platform where fellow pedophiles can openly interact and discuss their fantasies with children. Warning people about pedophiles in their community isn't harassment, it's a basic fucking precaution. Unless grooming kids is suddenly cool.

Finalized doc about Ezra and oddballs.online

Archived doc

(as with the original post, CONTENT WARNING: EVERYTHING. PEDOPHILIA, INCEST, BESTIALITY, ZOOSADISM, TODDLER/BABY ABUSE, GROOMING, CSEM TRADING, RAPE, ABDUCTION, ADMISSIONS OF CSA, ADMISSIONS OF INCEST, ADMISSIONS OF BESTIALITY)

Edit edit: replaced the link with the new version of the doc that has the minors' names censored.

[just-antithings]

For the antis: scenes of graphic violence and gore with fictional humans (and similar) are acceptable, but if any author makes the same type of scene, now with fictional irrational animals, he is accused of literal zoosadism.

[icarus-suraki]

Got this as a reply ages ago on my Ao3 post:

Yes, even that story.

Ao3 is not a platform. Ao3 is an archive.

Okay, so, this story was definitely not for the you, commenter. That's all there is to it. Not every story is for every person. And that's just how it is. And it's okay. There's an old saying in librarianship: "Every book its reader; every reader, a book."

But rather than freaking out, maybe we ought to query why the creator wrote and posted that story.

Because if they wrote it with the intention to be shocking and transgressive, they clearly succeeded. You, commenter, are shocked and find the whole thing extremely transgressive. Conceptually, it's a bit like novels that say drugs are great. Or like any number of commercially published novels that take on graphic murders. Horror novels have some fucked up shit in them sometimes and people who enjoy exploring intense emotions and situations in a fictional context read those without engaging in those behaviors.

For the record, I read a lot of "transgressive" literature and I'm out in the world with a job and a place to live and an internet connection. Meanwhile, fans of Christian fiction can be some of the most vicious beasts I have ever encountered. Thoughts?

This particular example, though, is also interesting because it's like inverse zoophilia/zoosadism--the human is the victim here, somehow. Zooisms have been a hot topic in recent years--so does this story stir up personal reactions to that topic? Is that the intention? I'm not about to defend acting zoophiles/zoosadists because they're literally engaging in animal abuse. Like, that's a crime. (Was the dog in this story a German shepherd? It's always German shepherds for some reason with the zoos.)

Or is the concern that this is the author's kink? Because there's a lot of concern over kinks anymore and whether a kink is acceptable or whether kinks are acceptable at all. Who is this story for? Someone with a similar kink? Don't start on the "consuming porn leads to more porn and more violent porn until you're a sexually-motivated serial killer" line because that comes out of a Ted Bundy interview and we all know he was a consummate liar. Again: horror fans read some fucked up shit. Mystery novel fans read some fucked up shit, even if they say the "good ending" absolves them of that. And they're not killing people.

Engaging with an unusual interest or desire on a level removed from reality is a much safer way to engage with that interest than in reality. Fiction is not reality. Movies are not reality. Theater is not reality. BDSM is theater and theater is not reality. These are all things with a remove from reality, which lets one engage with an interest without harm to self or others.

I can guarantee you that there are stories just as, if not more, distressing to you, the commenter, in notebooks and computer files all over the world. They still exist though they aren't published. You don't have to have read a story like the above to find a socially dangerous interest like this. These things can arise in relative isolation. Source: I grew up before the internet became what it is now and I have seen some shit.

The fact that this particular story was posted online suggests a desire on the part of the author to share it. Why would they want to do that? To shock readers? To find people with similar desires? Publication/posting implies a desire for responses. Why do you think this story was written? Why do you think it was shared? Who is the intended audience?

I'm sorry this story upset you, commenter. It absolutely sucks to get blindsided by a story (or any kind of media) that you find upsetting. It's certainly happened to me and I didn't like it either. I have had a lot of religious anxiety for most of my life and getting surprised by Chick Tracts being left around in the bookstore where I worked was not a good time. So, yes, I sympathize.

But it's impossible to control what billions of humans are going to be saying, doing, writing, or interested in. You can't stop people from writing fucked up shit, as much as you would like to. The best thing you can do is create a system to alert others about what, if anything, might be distressing in a piece of media. This is why, if one is usual Ao3 like a lending library and not an archive, there are content warnings, age recommendations, and tags. You can't control what everyone else is doing, but you can and should protect yourself as much as necessary. And, yes, that does mean that you have to deal with things that you don't like existing in shared spaces in the world. You may have to work on coming to terms with that. And yes I am serious. I have had to do the same thing in my life.

Also I have a lot of questions. How did you find this story? Was it by accident or was it intentional? What was the story "about"? How was it written? Was it genuine or was it a troll? Was the dog cognitively on a level with a human? How canine/anthropomorphized was the dog in this story? Was this Scooby Doo fanfic? Was this werewolf fanfic? Are you concerned that dogs will read this story and go on to rape eleven year-olds?

So why would someone write a story in which an eleven year-old gets raped by their dog?

And, gang, I anonymized the commenter on purpose. Don't go seek them out.

[proshippers-against-censorship]

I don’t really like lolicons for personal reasons but I wouldn’t call people pedophiles based on them liking lolis alone

The word shouldn’t be watered down like this.

THIS THIS THIS THIS

Use words along with the proper definitions, or else you'll wipe the definition out!

Labels and definitions matter, especially with stuff like pedophilia, zoosadism, etc.

(Side note that it's always okay to have stuff that you dislike / that squicks you out, so long as you block and move on instead of attacking ^^ don't know if you need the reminder, but I'm certain others do.)

[catbountry]

One of these days I'm gonna get completely zonked and write out an entire fucking essay on why Mister Metokur sucks and I don't like him, but I feel like I could just say "he kickstarted the internet dumpster fire that was GamerGate" and have justified my position completely.

So fucking tired of orbiting communities that talk about internet weirdos/drama and seeing creators kiss the fucking ring of some guy just because he's got a voice for radio and surrounds himself with people who are stupider than he is so he can toss them aside as soon as they inevitably do some stupid bullshit that he can make fun of and feel justified in doing so, like Sargon of Akkad and Ethan Ralph, all while lamenting that internet culture has changed since the 2000's and people on the internet like furries now more than they like otaku.

Oh yeah and he's using James Somerton's suicide note as an opportunity to expose Hbomberguy for shit he did nearly two decades ago and shame him for "troll's remorse." If I didn't highly suspect that this is another ploy by James to manipulate people into feeling sorry for him, I'd probably be more disgusted, but it proves this man just operates on pure spite. Like yeah, I get it, overly-performative troll's remorse is fucking cringe, but you're on a podcast with Null making jokes about "stinkditches" and saying unambiguously racist shit while laughing (in a video conveniently deleted from YouTube from September 17th, 2022). And if it weren't for Jim's army of asskissers, I'd probably be way more open about this sort of thing. But who's even reading my Tumblr at this point anyway?

The first time I remember being alarmed by him was that video he did on that creepy pedo who looked at photos of kids in bathtubs, and he was in a call with this guy and some girl said pedo was friends with, and Jim lost his patience and called her a "hole" and to shut up. People kiss Metokur's ass over this video. I don't even know if any action, criminal or otherwise, was taken against the dude and it was just an exercise in lording not being a pedophile over some deeply disturbed guy who probably had some kind of mental disability.

I am pretty much always going to have a fixation on strange internet people, internet drama, and horrifying nightmare people given unrestricted internet access. This is a character flaw of mine. I have tried to view these people more fairly in recent years, though to be honest, there's quite a few of them that are pretty goddamn hard to feel sorry for. But I also recognize a lot of my fascination was probably, at least partially, trollshielding; if I join in with the people making fun of these people, that means I won't be a target. It was a survival strategy learned from childhood and I'm not proud of it. But I also can't do the full troll's remorse because some of those people I talked shit about really were awful people. That doesn't make it okay when I would be snarky and judgemental towards people that didn't deserve it. Trying to stop a pedophile or helping shed light on a zoosadism ring doesn't make you a good person because even bigots hate pedos and people that torture animals. Congratulations on having the faintest resemblance of a conscience, it'd be nice if you could show that same outrage on behalf of black people and trans women. But we know you ain't doin' that.

Also I swear to god if somebody refers to him as "daddy Jim" and they're not taking the piss I'm gonna give them such a pinch.

P.S. James is very likely alive, btw. Who could have seen the serial liar and manipulator telling lies and emotionally manipulating people?

[agro-carnist]

Now that I'm slightly less in the spotlight, I'd like to talk about what has been going on and give my side. I'm sure you've all seen what has been said about me, but in case you haven't, this will include a discussion about zoophilia, zoosadism, pedophilia, and taboo kink/fetish.

I've taken several days to write this because I needed to clear my head so I could write something concise. I did not want to immediately write something too quickly that I couldn't think through.

I don't expect anyone to completely understand me or totally agree with my opinions, but I am writing this with full sincerity. I'd just like a little bit of faith when you read this. My positions are based on the science that I read, and I try to be someone that sticks to the side of evidence, not one of pure feelings or assumptions or what we think is common sense, even when it is difficult to understand or seems counterintuitive. I've always preached this principle on here, so I hope you all feel the same way. I ask that you read this with that in mind. Even if you don't reach the same conclusion as me, consider what I say and what I give with good faith.

All linked sources with restricted access can be read by copy/pasting the url or title into sci-hub

First, that twitter account is mine. The art contained on the twitter account is mine. Yes it is graphic. No I am not a zoophile, zoosadist, or pedophile. I understand this kind of art is disgusting and/or disturbing to many people. That is why I kept it on an account specifically for this kind of extreme art. It is why I don't advertise it. I am not secretive about my kinks/fetishes - I enjoy things like gore, noncon, and animal characters - but I know when and where these kinds of things are appropriate. Some of my art is not meant for a general audience. I won't advertise it to anyone and everyone to see because it can be upsetting to most people. That's also why I give plenty of content warnings and include the twitter censor that blurs the image and you have to click 'show' on to see. And that's why I believe posting screenshots of this material with my username, showing everyone exactly where to go to find this content, is irresponsible. I know the people that posted it think they're doing a service, but this is how children find content they shouldn't see. Callouts are how people find things they otherwise would never see. I, personally, don't think calling people out this way helps kids. I think it does more harm than good. My twitter was public but is now private because I don't want curious minors to look me up and look at what is on the account.

I understand that it can be hard to know why someone would enjoy erotic art of violence between animal characters without being a zoophile/zoosadist. But there are many reasons people enjoy taboo erotica without desiring it in the real world. About half of people experience paraphilic sexual fantasies, and the fantasies alone are not indicative of pathology. Deviant sexual fantasies are, in fact, "within the normal realm of human experience." There is little evidence that fantasy alone means someone wants to or will commit a sexual offense. Forced sex fantasies are extremely common. Violent sexual fantasies are not abnormal. Sex therapists and educators acknowledge that fantasies are not necessarily repressed desires. Sexual fantasy is not sexual desire. It's ok for our sexual interests to not reflect our moral code. Often taboo sexual fantasies are a way to explore how we feel about things, like repulsion. Humans are curious animals. We have morbid curiosities. Fantasies can be a way to experience something that would be immoral to act upon.

Why I am into taboo kink is hard to explain, and a lot of it I don't understand myself - human minds are very complex - but I can try to explain some of it. I enjoy exploring the darker parts of humanity. We're still animals and that means we still hold onto aspects that don't align with our morals. We have morbid curiosities. When we pass by a car crash, we want to see it, or when someone tells us something disturbing is spreading on the internet, we take interest in what it could be. Art is a way to fulfill that curiosity without any victims. Another thing is that it can be fun or therapeutic to imagine yourself in situations of bodily harm. That's probably confusing, but I like to explore what my body looks like on the inside, or what it would feel like to experience certain physical traumas, without the threat of dying. Fear and arousal are closely intertwined. The animal characters I draw are also very far removed from real world animals. They are sapient and behave very human. To me the only difference between them and an anthro furry character is the number of legs they walk on and the lack of clothes.

Because I draw this kind of content, many people are claiming that I am faking having ZOCD and my intrusive thoughts, or that my intrusive thoughts have turned into wanted thoughts. They say that if I really was distressed by these thoughts, I wouldn't engage with them through art. But my intrusive thoughts are about real people and animals. I do not have intrusive thoughts about characters. I watch movies and read books with murder, kidnapping, torture, disease, and freak accidents and enjoy these pieces of media. This does not negate the fact that I have intrusive thoughts about these things or the distress I feel regarding them. Someone getting hurt in a movie does not distress me. My intrusive thoughts include ideas of me or a loved one getting hurt, or me suddenly hurting someone. Intrusive thoughts target your fears and your morals. They make you question who you are as a person. That's why thoughts of real world violence are so distressing and depictions of violence in media are (usually) not. I fear losing someone I love, I fear losing a part of my mind or body, I fear losing control of my humanity and hurting someone, I fear loss of inhibition that makes me do things I wouldn't otherwise do. I don't fear hurting a character or a character doing a bad thing to another character. When I'm obsessing and becoming paranoid it's not over things that happen in fictional worlds. My therapist doesn't have to reassure me that I'll be ok if something bad happens in that fictional world. She does have to reassure me that the world isn't out to get me and that I don't have to act on a thought. Others with OCD might find media that resembles the content of their intrusive thoughts triggering, and that's normal, but not everyone will react the same. Not everyone copes with their mental illnesses the same way or has the same triggers. Most violent depictions just don't garner that same reaction from me because I don't have any moral qualms with fake people or animals getting hurt since they aren't real victims. It doesn't attack my moral beliefs that way. It may be upsetting to see, but doesn't make me fear for my or others' safety.

I love horror movies and haunted houses. I love the adrenaline and fear I experience during them. But I still metaphorically shit my pants at the thought of an actual serial killer stalking me and jumping out of a hiding spot. The difference is that the former exists in a safe space that I can leave and where I know it's a script. How I feel about a scenario in fiction does not dictate how I feel about it happening in the real world. To tell me that I don't actually have the disorder that I've been diagnosed with is extremely upsetting. So is to tell me I'm hiding secret bloodthirsty desires behind a mental illness or that I'm making OCD look bad by not having a moral conundrum about fake people or animals being hurt. I especially don't appreciate people that don't have OCD preaching about what "real" intrusive thoughts are or what I should or should not be doing while having OCD. The things that have been said to or about me have been undeniably ableist. And the distress that has caused me has just been brushed aside because I don't adhere to what people think I as a person with OCD "should" act like. I feel like I'm not being granted agency over my own experiences.

I am even being compared to some of the worst people like Kero the wolf or HypnotistSappho. I hope you believe me when I say that is truly disgusting and offensive. These were the kinds of people that belonged to groups for sharing material of real animals being tortured for sexual pleasure, or tried to start an organization to promote bestiality, or openly promoted zoophilia and pedophilia as normal sexual orientations, or actively abused children and animals. I have not done anything like that. My artistic expression is nothing like their real world, extensive and widespread levels of abuse. I am so offended that I'd spend years spreading animal welfare advocacy, including explicitly anti-bestiality rhetoric, only to be lumped in with monsters, like my art erases all the work I've done. How someone could believe I actually desire to torture animals baffles me. How someone could think all this work was just master manipulation to con everyone so I could secretly abuse leaves my head spinning.

I also haven't ever claimed that my nsfw art is a coping mechanism for my OCD/intrusive thoughts. This is an assumption people have made. Occasionally elements of my intrusive thoughts will make their way into my art as a way to confront them head on on my own terms, but almost always are not a factor in my nsfw art. Art based on my intrusive thoughts as catharsis I don't share publicly.

Yes, I enjoy hurting fictional characters. They exist in a world with no consequences. Nobody actually gets hurt. Anything can happen to them and nothing about the world changes. I have no desire to hurt an animal, because that impacts the real world. I have never looked at an animal and felt excitement at the idea of hurting it. I have never felt attraction to an animal. I have never felt the urge to make sexual contact with an animal. I have never experienced attraction to a child, either.

I am also being accused of being a pedophile. This is because I made a tweet saying I enjoy explicitly abusive relationships between adult and minor characters, but don't enjoy minor/adult ships depicted as cute or wholesome. People interpret this as me having a malicious desire to abuse a child. But here's the thing: you don't know why someone enjoys a certain dynamic. Many people that like to see abusive relationships depicted in stories or erotica are survivors of abuse themselves. Many people use kink as a coping mechanism, and the stigma of their kink play often hinders them from trauma recovery. Like I said before, kink and fantasy are not morality guidebooks. This also assumes every character drawn in ship art or erotica is an object of attraction to those that create or consume it. But even porn can serve a purpose other than arousal. Personally I just like these dynamics because they offer a compelling story and/or character interactions that can explore trauma and its effects and can feel therapeutic to work through.

Art does not exist in a vacuum. I don't argue it does. Art is influenced by its creator. But you can't look at the content of someone's kink or fantasy to judge the quality of someone's character. This is the position of professionals that study and counsel people. Whether or not someone commits a sexual offense is more influenced by that person's personality traits, moral positions, pre-existing positive beliefs about offending, environment, and negative emotional states. And, look, fiction does indeed effect reality, but there is little evidence that porn encourages someone to offend or results in more violent offenses. Availability of porn may even be associated with lower levels of sexual aggression. This professional report goes into great detail on sexual offending and concludes that there is no reason "scientific or otherwise" for criminalization of any type of virtual porn because it does not lead to offending, and may even provide a substitute for people that may otherwise offend. Even if you find that content reprehensible. Offensive art has its place and deserves to exist. That is the position I have come to based on the scientific evidence.

And I want to make another thing clear: I am not a proshipper. Disliking the position of one group does not make me a member of a different group. I have no desire to put myself in a category, I just have my own opinions. I also have plenty of issues with the proship community. I just now look at fiction and kink with more nuance than I used to. I don't participate in fearmongering based on knee-jerk reactions to media anymore.

Going forward I'm going to do my best to be more responsible with my nsfw accounts. Any interactions I've made with minors are honest mistakes. I genuinely don't want to expose minors to my nsfw or interact with them. I don't go out seeking minors to talk to. But I know interacting with minors through an nsfw account is serious, so I'm going to do better to police myself and always check that no one I'm interacting with is underage.

If you made it this far, thank you for reading. Sadly I expect many people won't read this, they'll just continue to repeat "zoophile" and "pedophile." But I really appreciate you if you took the time to read. I know many people really do want to be good and believe they are protecting people by engaging in callouts against people for their fictional interests. I think most people have their hearts in the right place but are misguided by the current culture. And I don't mind if you disagree with me, but I always want people to take their positions with the most information. I want there to be honest discussions about these topics, not naming and shaming people.

I might make updates to this post if I think of things I forgot to address. Like I said, it's been many days of my head buzzing and this post is also very long. I welcome any good faith questions or concerns. People that come just to attack in bad faith will just be blocked. I won't humor that. Please meet me with the same honesty I came with. I want to continue to do good.

-Agro

[unclewileys-bahblog]

Its Miku Guy here to make any sense at all oopsies

in the song "(Not) A Devil" there's two Mikus.... them in a consang relationship. hopefully that makes more sense!!!

obligatory Ty again bc otherwise i am RUDE /silly

OH, okay! Sure!! :3

Name: Hatsune Miku, Demon Miku

Age: 19

Gender: Catgender, Agender, Hellishthing, Demonbodiment, Transmasc, Pandemonic

Pronouns: Cat/cat’s, They/them, Mew/mew’s, Hell/fire, Thing/thing’s, He/him, It/it’s, Claw/claw’s, Hiss/hiss’s, Satan/satan’s, Gore/gore’s, She/her, Kill/kill’s, Blood/blood’s

Sexuality: Gay

Species: Demon

Ethnicity: Japanese

Source: (Not) A Devil

Roles: BPD persecutor, ADHD holder, Verbal protector

CisIDS: cisAFAB, cisBPD, cisADHD, cisNonHuman, cisJapanese, cisBilingual (japanese, english), cisTsundere, cisYeredere

TransIDS: transWorshipped, transGroomed, trans🍇ist, transNPD, RedVelvetCakeScentian

Personality: Mean, Vulgar, Flirty, Crude, Enthusiastic, Blunt, Loyal, Rational, Pessimistic, Aggressive, Loud, Stubborn

Paraphiles: Consang, Menophilia

Other Labels: Radqueer

Faceclaims:

Name: Hatsune Miku, Angel Miku

Age: 19

Gender: Horrorangel, Nonbinary, Angelbodiment, Goldecorangelwingic

Pronouns: Angel/angel’s, It/it’s, Gore/gore’s, Glow/glow’s, Shi/hir, Halo/halo’s, Gold/gold’s, Sparkle/sparkle’s, Wing/wing’s, Horror/movie, Light/light’s

Sexuality: Lesbian

Species: Angel

Ethnicity: Japanese

Source: (Not) A Devil

Roles: Soother, Little caretaker, Emotional protector, Autism holder

CisIDS: cisIntersex, cisJapanese, cisBilingual (japanese, english), cisAutistic, cisOCD, cisYandere

TransIDS: transHarmfulYandere, transChristian, transInnocentHarmful, transAFAB, transYellowEyes, transYellowBlood, VanillaCakeScentian

Personality: Gentle, Soft spoken, Kind, Caring, Loving, Loyal, Honest, Generous, Pure, Smart, Respectful

Paraphiles: Lactophilia, Consang, Zoosadism, a Hybristophilia, Oplophilia, Opophilia, Souvliphilia

Other Labels: Proship, Radqueer, Arctic Fox therian

Faceclaims:

Feel free to change whatever you’d like! ^^

- Mod Ruthie

[yuri-for-businesswomen]

someone needs to investigate the link between hentai and furry because from the furry art i sometimes see on this website, most seem to have pornbrain. they almost always have the same anime like drawing style, im always embarrassed they call themselves artists when there is nothing creative about that drawing style. im sure there are some furries who treat it like cosplay more than a sex thing but it very much is a sex thing. if you type in furry in tumblr search bar you will see kink shit within the first few posts, and of course enlarged breasts. furries do have a zoophilia and zoosadism problem in their community too, unsurprisingly. how many kids first introduction to kink is through furry stuff online? you take these characters appealing to kids, often even from kids shows, and sexualise them in the wildest ways possible. my first exposure to vore was through furry fetish „art“ on this website when i was a minor still.

none of this has anything to do with being same sex attracted. and i think most trans people would also be offended to be compared to people who have a fetish for (cartoon) animals. and „dressing weird“ and „looking different“ are not inherently lgb characterisitics.

this is why i hate the term „queer“. to me its not a slur because im german and we have no equivalent (to my knowledge), the literal english term was introduced here as an umbrella term - we even have a „queer beauftrage“ („queer deputy“) in the national government. „queer“ is always associated with lgb and now trans people (who are already two different groups with divergent interests and the only reason we‘re historically tied is because transvestites used to be homosexual). now all sorts of kinksters and „sexual minorities“ attach themselves to this. we already have an issue with how bold both bdsm and pedophilia groups are in germany. they love that „queer“ is associated with gays and lesbians and their valid advocacy for same rights, same sex marriage, and so on, which gives legitimacy to the tqa++* since gay and lesbian acceptance has increased since the 2010s (and now back to decreasing because of gender nonsense and worse, these other groups), while at the same time not meaning same sex attracted which allows anyone considering themselves a „sexual minority“ - such as furries - to call themselves „queer“, leeching of the legitimacy of the gay rights movement while at the same time undoing progress of the movement by branding same sex attracted people „queer“, weird, different, basically the same as having a fetish. fuck off!

[princessgemsart]

PayPal Commissions

Hello to everyone reading this, I have officially decided that I will be opening up PayPal Commissions due to personal reasons I refuse to explain at the moment.

For anyone interested, here are my options:

Sketch for $15

Examples:

2. Ink/Lineart for $20

Examples:

3. Colored without Background for $25

Examples:

4. Colored with Background for $30

Examples:

GROUND RULES:

1. I will not start the commission until I receive the full payment

2. I need a description of what I exactly want. At least a 5 sentence paragraph.

3. Please give me references for Fan Media or OCs if I have never heard of them.

4. The minimum of commissions I can and will receive from customers is four.

5. DO NOT PAY UNTIL I CONFIRM YOUR ORDER! After I confirm it, I will note or DM you privately for my email.

6. The deadline for me doing your commission (depending on my schedule) is possibly a month. Afterwards, you have the right for a refund.

7. DO NOT COMMISSION ME IF YOU ARE A MINOR OR UNDER 18! I'm sorry, but I am 100% NSFW/18+! NO KIDS OR MINORS ALLOWED! IF I FIND OUT THAT YOU ARE A MINOR, I WILL AUTOMATICALLY DECLINE YOUR ORDER AND BLOCK YOU!

8. I will ONLY accept payments through PayPal and I prefer it to be in USD.

9. If any of these rules are broken, I have the right to decline your order.

DOs:

1. Fanart (Even for Fandoms I'd never heard of)

2. OCs

3. Furries or Anthros

4. NSFW or SFW/Aged Up Characters (This one may be a little tricky, but I'm open for it. :) )

5. Yaoi/Yuri/Hetero Ships (Poly included)

6. Bondage (Again a little tricky, but I can try. ^^)

DONTs:

1. Pedophilia, Zoophilia/Zoosadism, Incest, Necrophilia, Rape, Child Porn, or Abuse,

2. Bigotry or Discrimination of Any Kind

3. Incels

4, Alpha or Beta Males

5. Most Fetishes (Top 5 No Nos: Inflation, Vomit, Farting, Scat, and Piss)

6. Political or Religious Propaganda

Again, if any of these rules are broken, I have the right to decline your commission.

FINAL NOTE:

Due to Tumblr's policy, some, if not, most of my NSFW commissions will be excluded only on my FA, NewGrounds, or Twitter/X. If you wish to follow me on either one, I'm PrincessGem on FurAffinity and NewGrounds and DebraisDisney on X/Twitter. :)

I will not take any free requests or free art trades. Ask me for them and you'll be blocked. End of story.

Have any questions, comments, or concerns? Comment down below or note me privately for more. <3