#zimbardo
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
talesfromthenorsesmouth · 1 year ago
Text
psychology grads in popular media: we despise Freud so much we have clubs about hating him
actual psychology grads (me): if roy lichenstein wasn't dead I'd kill him myself
10 notes · View notes
betshy · 10 months ago
Link
0 notes
mandyjane-lifedesign · 1 year ago
Link
0 notes
probablyasocialecologist · 2 years ago
Text
Recent research found the cruelty of Zimbardo’s prison guards didn’t emerge spontaneously; some behaviour was encouraged. Some of the “prisoners” later admitted that they were pretending to be distressed. Similarly, a study published in 2007 found that the 1964 incident that inspired the theory of the bystander effect was distorted. According to the paper, archive material shows far fewer people witnessed the incident than was reported at the time, and some people could only hear screams, without seeing the location of the incident. At least one person did try to intervene. Recent research indicates that bystanders are much more likely to intervene than the theory suggests. A 2019 study of 219 violent situations from cities around the world caught on CCTV showed that bystanders – not just one, usually several – intervened to help victims 90% of the time. The study also found that the more people were present, the more likely passers-by were to intervene. In the words of the study’s lead researcher, Richard Philpot: “It shows that people have a natural inclination to help when they see someone in need.” The burgeoning field of “heroism studies” also questions the bystander effect. In a recent article for The Conversation, I described how acts of heroic altruism are common during terrorist attacks, when people often risk their own lives to help others. Consider the following situation: you’re standing on a train platform. The person next to you suddenly faints and falls on to the track, unconscious. In the distance, you can see a train approaching. What would you do? You might doubt whether you would act heroically. But don’t underestimate yourself. There is a strong possibility that, before you knew it, you would find yourself on down on the track, helping the person to safety. There is a growing awareness amongst researchers that heroism is natural and spontaneous, and by no means exceptional.
399 notes · View notes
lost-ethics · 21 days ago
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
Excerpt from Lost: Life & Ethics in The Age of AI, Chapter 42
8 notes · View notes
aethyrmazz · 4 months ago
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
An opinion widely held is not evidence of truth.
To add to my little athenaeum, "The Lucifer Effect Understanding How Good People Turn Evil" by Philip Zimbardo published 2007. Experimental psychology. This book focuses on how environmental factors influence individuals to behave immorally, rather than their inherent personal traits.
Being a psychology buff, I myself have turned to the use of psychological manipulation which refers to control tactics that we may use to influence a person's thinkings, emotions, or behaviors. Typically this is done for the manipulators benefit, often done to just prove a point, sometimes done for the sake of chaos (f**k you if you do this)
Despite what you might feel ethically, or your emotional opinions of psychological manipulation it's not something you can escape. You yourself do it, and are being manipulated everyday. You would be bored if you weren't.
9 notes · View notes
origami-butterfly · 4 months ago
Text
Christina Maslach, poster girl of the "I can fix him" movement.
10 notes · View notes
kani-miso · 10 months ago
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
@blitz0hno
19 notes · View notes
cult-of-the-eye · 11 months ago
Text
i was put on this earth to do ethically ambiguous psychology experiments which people will debate about in the future decades because despite the concerning amounts of stress and harm caused, it garnered extremely useful results.
16 notes · View notes
kikikoifi · 8 months ago
Text
Tumblr media
Okay I know I said I was done but then I messed it up and now I’m fixing it and now I love it 🥰 🔪
18 notes · View notes
proceduralbob · 9 months ago
Text
That means when you read about the SPE or the many studies in this next section, you might well conclude that you would not do what the majority has done, that you would, of course, be the exception to the rule. That statistically unreasonable belief (since most of us share it) makes you even more vulnerable to situational forces precisely because you underestimate their power as you overestimate yours. You are convince you would be the good guard, the defiant prisoner, the resistor, the dissident, the nonconformist, and, most of all, the Hero. Would that it were so, but heroes are a rare breed.
The Lucifer Effect: Understanding How Good People Turn Evil, Philip G. Zimbardo
8 notes · View notes
v-ividus · 1 month ago
Text
42. Liberation of Self: Redefining Humanity Beyond the Political Abyss
“The expectations of others often become self-fulfilling prophecies. Without realizing it, we often behave in ways that confirm the beliefs others have about us. Those subjective beliefs create new realities for us. We often become who other people think we are, in their eyes and in our behavior.” — Philip G. Zimbardo
In the labyrinth of political affiliation and national identity, we find ourselves ensnared by an oppressive web of expectations. From the moment we draw breath, societal structures attempt to mold us into conforming cogs—pawns in a manipulative chess game where the stakes are often our very identities. This dynamic can breed a pernicious form of learned psychopathy, where we internalize the distorted narratives of our so-called leaders, distancing ourselves from our intrinsic humanity. We become echoes of others’ beliefs, caricatures of what was never ours to embody.
This insidious process must be scrutinized; it breeds an unsettling madness within the collective psyche. Our worth is often measured against the arbitrary benchmarks set by political ideologies, leading us to a disconcerting conclusion: that we are less than we could be. When our self-perception is defined by an allegiance to a system that thrives on division, we become prisoners of that very allegiance. It’s a tragedy of self-betrayal, where authentic values and beliefs yield to an artificial identity, a grotesque distortion tightening its grasp around our essence.
To truly define oneself demands a courageous confrontation with these allegiances—a radical act of defiance against the self-fulfilling prophecies bestowed upon us by societal expectations. How often do we act in ways that reaffirm superficial labels while ignoring our deeper truths? Slowly, we must peel away the layers of imposed identity and rediscover the essence of who we are beneath the weight of society's judgments, biases, and dictates.
Through rigorous introspection, we can shed the skin of the roles we’ve been forced to play. This means questioning the morality of a system that manipulates allegiance and loyalty, forcing individuals into an uncomfortable dance of conformity. It's in this unearthing that we reveal the disturbingly artificial constructs of political alignment, and reclaim the agency that is our birthright.
The first step toward personal sovereignty lies in recognizing the damage inflicted by blind adherence to these structures. Only then can we start cultivating an identity rooted in genuine beliefs. The challenge is in seeking an existence beyond the limitations of political narrative, a quest for a holistic self that thrives unapologetically outside governmental confines.
The Dangers of Abnormal Attachment: Identity in Crisis
Connection is the cornerstone of humanity, yet when mishandled within the realms of political and nationalist affiliations, it deranges itself into a distorted collage of emotional deprivation and psychological detachment. We observe this when individuals cling to ideals as a coping mechanism for insecurity, leading to violent confrontations not only with one another but also with their inner selves. Here, we find abnormal attachments manifesting as twisted dependencies on group affiliations, where an individual's worth is inextricably linked to the collective's ideological dogma.
At this juncture, we must confront an uncomfortable truth: many have crafted a social reality that thrives on ignorance and emotional disconnection. Political parties and nationalist ideologies exploit these fragile relations, harnessing them to create a battleground of opposing extremities. Such institutions often favor psychopathy over empathy, breeding a culture where compassion is a rarity, not the norm. The product of this emotional alienation is a societal landscape littered with fractured relationships and moral confusion, evading true human contact.
The consequences are profound; lost within the cacophony of competing ideologies, we lose the ability to empathize—and in doing so, we diminish our very humanity. The psychological toll is insidious, retreating into shadows of psychopathy disguised as loyalty. This captivating affiliation to destructive beliefs showcases a societal failure to engage meaningfully with complexity and contradiction, paving the way for an epidemic of relational deficits.
For those ensnared in this cycle, it becomes a perilous path, an addictive journey that leads deeper into isolation and despair. Critical analysis reveals that normalization of abnormal attachment is not simply an emotional quirk but a symptom of a broader sociological malaise. When personal identities are hostage to the whims of political constructs, the essence of genuine human connection is sacrificed on the altar of dogma.
Ultimately, unraveling these bonds is not just about personal liberation; it is critical to our collective reparative efforts as a society. Identifying the frailty of our attachments encourages us to rebuild connections based on authenticity rather than dependency. Through keen observation, we can begin cultivating emotional resilience that stands in stark contrast to the sterile environment fostered by political indoctrination.
The Facade of Change: Illusions Chasing Validation
In an age dominated by social media, we are often bombarded by a flood of curated realities designed to fabricate a semblance of progress—a trend masquerading as change. Yet, beneath the digital gloss, a more sinister truth emerges: the deceptive nature of these platforms propagates a culture of surface-level engagement that further entrenches our divisions. The real change, requiring tangible action and human empathy, becomes eclipsed by the endless scrolling, reducing complex societal issues into palatable bites for quick consumption.
The algorithms governing these platforms thrive on sensationalism over substance, fostering an environment where ignorant outrage becomes the currency of influence. In this vein, social media, rather than fostering connection, fortifies disconnection, nurturing the rationalizations of abusers who proudly wield moral high grounds based on their fabricated personas. As engagement metrics swell, so too does the illusion of contributing to a collective effort—an illusion that often perpetuates the very moral decay it pretends to alleviate.
As a society, we must grapple with the empty promises of social media activism. Are we truly invested in understanding the humanity of others, or are we simply keen on accumulating the validation of digital applause? The fear of missing out amplifies a commitment to superficial interaction and tribal affiliation that drowns the voices of those longing for authentic connection. Without addressing this twisted dynamic, we risk devaluing the real struggles faced by individuals enmeshed in systemic inequalities.
Such an introspection ignites a confrontation with our motivations: if we truly seek change, we must be willing to engage beyond our screens, to nurture human relationships steeped in complex emotions, not devoid of nuance. The cacophony of social noise should not deter us; instead, we must amplify the voices of individuals whose lives have been darkened by the very ideologies we thought we were dismantling.
In this space of confrontation, we reclaim our agency as active participants in fostering meaningful change. Authenticity defines this journey; as we shed the fears of judgment or alienation, we become vessels of true transformation, exposing the hollow nature of societal complacency.
Rediscovering Humanity: A Pathway to Real Compassion
The journey to redefine oneself beyond the limitations of political institutions is not without its profound challenges. However, rediscovering our shared humanity offers a pathway to restore compassion in a disjointed world. This revival begins with the realization that each individual, regardless of race, creed, or political orientation, possesses an intrinsic worth that transcends artificial divisions. When we engage with others through the lens of their experiences rather than through preconceived biases, we nurture the space for empathy to flourish.
This endeavor often requires us to confront deeply internalized prejudices—the results of a lifelong conditioning shaped by societal narratives that celebrate conflict over cooperation. In doing so, we embark on a demanding but rewarding journey; peeling back the layers of dense emotional barriers shielding us from authentic engagement allows us to experience an awakening of compassion.
Additionally, fostering this process can be catalyzed by reaching out and engaging with diverse perspectives, acknowledging our commonalities rather than magnifying our differences. Through dialogue grounded in genuine curiosity, we begin to understand the universality of human desire: to feel seen, heard, and valued—a phenomenon that is often lost amidst the tumult of political discourse. This constructive exchange can collapse the illusion of 'the other' and allow us to commune in the much-needed space of shared vulnerability.
As we redefine the contours of our humanity, the paragraphs of our personal narratives begin to intertwine with those of others. This tapestry of collective experience becomes fertile ground for collaborative efforts aimed at addressing societal ills that have historically plagued our civilization. It is within this ironic intersection of individuality and shared humanity that we can channel our collective capacity for change—healing the collective wound inflicted by regimes that have thrived on division.
To redefine humanity, we must embody empathetic action, validating the experiences of others, and confronting our complicity in a system that seeks to devalue individual life. Only through this relentless pursuit of compassion can we dismantle the barriers that continue to fracture our connections, enabling us to cultivate a richer, more nuanced understanding of what it means to be human.
Confronting the Self: Moral Neurosis in the Age of Betrayal
To untangle the threads of our disillusionments, we must confront the uncomfortable truths of our actions and motivations. We are, often unwittingly, participants in a toxic cycle that perpetuates a moral neurosis, where human lives are rendered expendable in favor of loyalty to nationalistic or political ideologies. This betrayal—a severance of our intrinsic connection to the humanity of others—plunges us into a dark abyss where empathy becomes an endangered quality.
The expectation to conform to certain identities can lead us to take on roles that inhibit our moral compasses. The scientific and sociological studies reveal the alarming correlation between unexamined beliefs and the erosion of ethical responsibility—a psychic shift that allows us to dismiss the plights of those we perceive as 'other.' In this moral haze, we bolster our psychological defenses against feelings of guilt or discomfort, pushing us further from our intrinsic moral center.
Nevertheless, confronting the self—stripping away layers of denial—becomes an essential act of personal and collective reclamation. As we sit with our discomfort, we open ourselves to the reality of our repercussions. This transformative awareness demands honesty, forcing us to acknowledge how our decisions impact not just our lives but also the lives of those around us. It calls for a recalibration of our moral strategies and a vital commitment to uphold values that transcend ideological divides.
Examining the fragility of our values requires us to dismantle the paternalistic tendencies exhibited within hierarchical systems of power. To take an active stance against the erosion of empathy and moral responsibility, we must view our ethical choices through an expansive lens, one that embraces the complexity of human experiences. This reassessment allows for a newfound clarity and challenges us to confront our complicity in perpetrating the very ideals we seek to rebut.
Ultimately, confronting not merely the intentions but the consequences of our actions empowers us to reclaim the narrative of authenticity. By cultivating moral courage, we pave the way for a future where empathy reigns, counteracting the prevailing tide of emotional detachment that has permeated the fabric of our society.
The Call to Action: Reconstructing the Ethical Framework
In our pursuit to define ourselves outside of political and nationalist institutions, we must construct a new ethical framework anchored in the shared values of respect, dignity, and mutual understanding. This framework must not only be theoretical; it requires an actionable dimension that holds us accountable for recognizing humanity within ourselves and others. As we design an ethical compass for our collective future, we must raise the bar on moral standards that have often been tempered by political and ideological biases.
Reconstructing this ethical landscape begins with embracing vulnerability. We must allow our conversations to encompass the uncomfortable—a space where complexity exists without reduction. Skilled dialogue encourages individuals to step outside of their comfort zones, challenging preconceptions and dismantling barriers that shield us from empathy. The invitation to engage with diverse narratives broadens our understanding, fostering a shared commitment to compassion that defies divisive politics.
Moreover, the gravitational pull of social media must be counteracted through intentional action. We aim to create a digital ecology that champions spontaneity and authenticity—inviting vulnerable voices while denouncing the allure of curated facades. In this digital renaissance, we must emphasize the value of connection over the hollow pursuit of validation, urging ourselves and others to place genuine interaction at the forefront of our collective experience.
As we move through this transformative journey, we find ourselves not merely as observers but engaged participants in a grand narrative of reclamation. By fostering resilience, rebuilding relationships, and redefining our ethical bearings, we breathe life into an evolving ethos that transcends the limitations of political designations. Our collective struggle is valid; it is rooted in a desire for more substantial connections, unclouded by the fog of societal expectations.
Conclusion: Cultivating a New Shared Vision for Progress
In our quest to establish a self defined beyond political and nationalist institutions, we recognize the necessity of unearthing authentic identities buried under the weight of imposed narratives. This journey is not merely an individual endeavor; it beckons us toward a collective commitment to prioritizing humanity above ideologies. Navigating the complexities of our moral fabric requires vulnerability, courage, and introspection as we confront our learned attachments and emotional disconnections.
As we grasp the repercussions of our actions, we become catalysts for renewed connections forged in compassion and empathy—pathways through which we can foster an enriching dialogue about our shared human experience. The recognition of the intrinsic worth of each individual reignites our capacity to confront prevailing nihilism, aspiring towards the restoration of human dignity—a mission necessitated by deep moral obligation.
This invitation to redefine ourselves is not for the faint-hearted. It calls for relentless questioning, uncomfortable introspection, and a commitment to authentic engagement. Embracing our shared humanity becomes the guiding light toward genuine transformation—transformations that inspire us to reclaim our moral and ethical identity, fostering a society that values humanity beyond borders, politics, and ideologies.
3 notes · View notes
roomselfcontain2 · 3 months ago
Text
A very sharp standard low budget cheap affordable income one bedroom house apartment for rent very neat and cool houses available now as pay and parking immediately all major components in this house is working located at rumuekini new layout in port Harcourt city rivers state Nigeria.
2 notes · View notes
polynesianpen · 7 months ago
Text
Tumblr media
i’m a fucking sucker for this book. i got it a couple years ago after watch the Stanford Prison Experiment movie. it’s pretty beat up and outlined but i’ve yet to finish it although I am determined to finish it within the next month or so.
2 notes · View notes
ortodelmondo · 11 months ago
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
Xavier Zimbardo : Holi
2 notes · View notes
lost-ethics · 21 days ago
Text
Tumblr media
Excerpt from Lost: Life & Ethics in The Age of AI, Chapter 42
3 notes · View notes