#whom to hate

[sama-homes]

What's Going Wrong with the Environment These Days?

The state of our environment has reached a critical juncture, and several alarming trends highlight the urgent need for action. Here are some of the most pressing environmental issues we're facing today:

1. Climate Change

The most significant environmental challenge is climate change, driven primarily by the increase in greenhouse gas emissions. The burning of fossil fuels for energy, deforestation, and industrial processes have elevated atmospheric carbon dioxide levels, leading to global warming. This results in more frequent and severe weather events, melting polar ice caps, rising sea levels, and disruption of ecosystems.

2. Biodiversity Loss

Species are disappearing at an unprecedented rate, often referred to as the sixth mass extinction. Habitat destruction, pollution, overfishing, and climate change are the main culprits. The loss of biodiversity diminishes ecosystem resilience, affecting food security, health, and the global economy.

3. Pollution

Pollution in its many forms—air, water, and soil—is deteriorating the environment and human health. Air pollution from vehicles and industrial emissions contributes to respiratory diseases and global warming. Water pollution from plastics, chemicals, and waste disrupts marine life and contaminates drinking water. Soil pollution from pesticides and heavy metals reduces agricultural productivity and harms wildlife.

4. Deforestation

Forests are being cleared at an alarming rate for agriculture, urban development, and logging. Deforestation contributes to the loss of biodiversity, disruption of water cycles, and increased carbon dioxide levels in the atmosphere, exacerbating climate change.

5. Plastic Waste

The proliferation of plastic waste, particularly single-use plastics, is choking oceans and rivers. Microplastics have infiltrated the food chain, posing risks to marine and human health. Efforts to manage plastic waste through recycling and reduction initiatives are crucial but often inadequate.

6. Overconsumption and Waste

The current rate of resource consumption is unsustainable. The 'throwaway culture' leads to massive amounts of waste, with landfills and oceans becoming dumping grounds. This overconsumption depletes natural resources, generates pollution, and accelerates environmental degradation.

7. Water Scarcity

Freshwater resources are becoming increasingly scarce due to overuse, pollution, and climate change. Many regions are experiencing severe droughts, affecting agriculture, drinking water supplies, and ecosystems. Efficient water management and conservation are essential to address this crisis.

Call to Action

Addressing these environmental challenges requires a multi-faceted approach:

Policy Changes: Stronger environmental regulations and international agreements to reduce emissions, protect habitats, and manage resources sustainably.

Technological Innovation: Investment in renewable energy, sustainable agriculture, and waste management technologies.

Behavioral Shifts: Promoting sustainable consumption, reducing waste, and increasing public awareness about environmental issues.

Corporate Responsibility: Encouraging businesses to adopt sustainable practices and reduce their environmental footprint.

Our Responsibility : We should minimize the waste we produce and try not to use plastic, switch over to metal cookware , dinnerware and drink ware.

SAMA Homes : one such organization which is manufacturing and selling homeware which are sustainable

By understanding and addressing these critical issues, we can work towards a healthier planet for future generations. The time to act is now. Every effort counts in the fight for our environment.

[gatixan]

[violetspark14]

has this been done yet

[chazchaschad]

go my hice

[yore-donatsu]

Some idiot #sketches on Ramattra and D-va bc I like them 😊 (both as silly friends and/or like a ship💜) Before some people start moaning: I love to see our great ommiac in good company and be happy ! 😚

[goozeghost]

ART pestering MB with riddles

(based on an actual conversation between my best friend and I)

[lurukifennecfox]

Anti-spectra!Jazz

so, we have Ghost!Jazz for whatever reason, i personally like it to happen a few years after Danny's Accident.

so Jazz is a ghost now, and her Obsession is predictably Psychology but unlike Spectra, Jazz gets pover from her clients actually making progress!

i also think it would be hilarious if Jazz's human disguise is more convincing that Danny's human form since his ghost side started bleeding into it more and he gives off uncanny vibes. Jazz does too but not more than anybody from amity park.

and she decides to move to Gotham because of course she wants to work in Arkham she can fulfill her Obsession and actually help people a lot there!

[tinynerdycthulu]

tbh i dunno why so many sj apologists are anti-yqy. because like????? he is your mascot. he was the originator. the head honcho of excusing sj's levels of unmitigated villainy. look into my eyes and tell me that qi ge wouldn't blush and kick his feet if he saw xiao jiu commit murder. actually we don't NEED to imagine bc jiumei did just that and yue qi just grabbed his hand and ran, no thoughts head empty. arson? child abuse?? yue qi doesn't care. whatever makes xiao jiu happy <3

[madscientistreaction]

long time, no see !

[kiwinatorwaffles]

i pity people who say “yeah it’s nice to see these two characters as friends but their relationship becomes so much more meaningful if you see them as romantic.” how has the dredges of the amanormative world poisoned you this bad? have you never had a friend or wanted a friend who changed your life for the better? or if you do i feel bad for them because of so obviously little you value them

[gatixan]

"MR. JOHN JIG SAW."

[emiliagrant]

Buck and Tommy ♡ flirty, kinky and in love

[mathispunk]

was watching a video essay on him during drawing this ughgh

[luke-shywalker]

So how do we think it felt for Kylo to realize that he had not in fact killed his abuser but that his abuser was not even a real person and there were dozens of copies of him floating in tanks

[meanderingstream]

Thoughts on Leverage OT3 and Canon

I think that if some of the things that the OT3 said to each other were said by a man and a woman in a TV show, the audience would clearly read it as romantic. Like if a hetero ship said:

“For better or worse, we change together,” from the Rundown Job {for better, for worse, in sickness and in health…}

and “til my dying day” from the Long Goodbye Job {to death do us part},

and (you never really need anything.) “Yeah, I did [soft, loving look], but thanks to you I don’t have to search anymore,” from the Long Goodbye Job

and Hardison’s “for tonight, [name] has perfect pitch. You ever wonder how Britney Spears sounds so good on her tracks? Well, this is it, except mine's is in real time, Baby.” From the Studio Job,

and Parker’s [I’ll] “be here for you forever and we’ll always be together” from the Harry Wilson Job,

and Hardison’s “I’m here if you need me. Anytime,” from the Fractured Job

and the Hurricane Job with Parker and Eliot’s “I can’t do this without you.” “Well, that’s never gonna happen, [name].” “The arm around me was a nice touch,”

and “I’m making a four-course meal for them” from the Date Night Job

and “maybe I don’t like watching someone I care about take punches meant for me. You know, maybe I don’t wanna do a job that involves me watching you get hurt all the time.” From the Weekend in Paris Job

and “I mean, I’m in a great relationship, but would I even be in it if it were up to those swiping machines?” “We are in trouble.” “Nah, I mean, [me and you]? That’s fine. That’s working.”

If all those things had been said between one male and one female character, I feel like the audience would pretty clearly read it as romantic. I mean, my mom insists that Joan Watson and Sherlock Holmes got together romantically at the end of Elementary because of the hug and the line, “I’m staying. Of course I’m staying,” even though it did not read it that way to me. General audiences will read a lot of things as confirming a m/f couple because they see that kind of story so often that it’s what they expect.

Now granted, TV shows do like their slow burns because it provides tension without having to create problems in an established relationship, so fans of straight ships often do have a long wait for canonization. However, people didn’t question whether Josh and Donna from The West Wing or Tony and Ziva from NCIS were romantically interested in each other. It was clearly canon that they had those type of feelings or that type of interest for each other, there were just other things getting in the way of them actually starting to date. If a hetero ship said all those quotes listed above to each other, their romantic interest would absolutely be read as canon by the audience, even if they had not yet been shown on a date or kissing in the show. But because this is between 3 people, the OT3 is a somewhat niche ship in the general audience of Leverage outside of tumblr and AO3.

Like many of us here, I also felt let down when the Maria plotline happened in season 1 of L:R, especially after John Roger’s tweet that they’d canonized the OT3 after the Long Goodbye Job and his tweet that “your OT3 is safe” about the reboot. He specifically called it the OT3 in both cases, which pretty clearly refers to polyamory. If he meant that the characters that make up the OT3 (Hardison, Parker, and Eliot) are safe as in alive and healthy, then he should have said that. If he meant their friendship was safe, then he should have said that. If he meant they are in an open relationship or that Eliot is in a queer  emotional relationship with the other two but is not romantically and/or se✖ually involved with them, that should have been made clearer in the show. Instead, by the end of season 1, we got Eliot looking for fulfillment in life by trying to find a girlfriend to settle down with, and Parker qualifying her statement that they'd be together forever with “I know it's not the same [as a romantic relationship].”

Parker and Hardison’s romance is clearly stated and shown in the series (as it should be because they are awesome <3), but Eliot is not included in this unambiguously romantic relationship. While I am loving the partnership between the 3 of them and all of the OT3 nods so far in the 3rd season, I am also a little frustrated that they are just nods.

The burden of proof for a queer and/or poly ship is higher than a m/f pair. There is enough canon evidence to make a compelling argument that Eliot is the life partner of Hardison and Parker. However, the burden of proof for this type of relationship is higher because it is not what audiences are trained to expect. I adore the 3 of them together, and whether the series would show them all kissing or give us open, explicit discussion of their relationship as something like a queer-platonic partnership (probably not using that term, but that kind of relationship), I would love it either way. As it is now though, we get hints and nods that make OT3 shippers freak out, but that can be easily overlooked by general audiences as just good friends. If they are meant to be read as just really good friends, I wish John Rogers would not have used the term OT3, the definition of which includes the word “polyamory.” If they are meant to be polyamorous, I wish the show would make it unambiguous that’s what is going on, meeting that higher burden of proof for queer relationships.

On the other hand, I don’t want to complain about queer-baiting, because I feel like it’s not allowed to confirm your main characters are in a polyamorous relationship in a procedural like this that doesn’t center relationship drama. That seems like it’s just not possible yet. They are allowed to have a canon lesbian main character now- unlike in the original series- but I feel like maybe polyamory is still not an option. So the only other option than what the writers are currently doing is to totally disavow the OT3, which I obviously don’t want to happen. Maybe I’ll be proven wrong by the end of L:R season 3. I would absolutely love that to happen (dear God, please make that happen). But I’m not holding my breath.

I do still really appreciate John Rogers for the way he runs the show (both in the original and for season 3 of L:R) and for openly acknowledging and even supporting polyamorous ships, which is rare to find. I am aware that they fought for more queer representation in the original series but were only allowed that one cop lady from the Experiment Job in a single episode. Maybe this is the most they can get away with now, or maybe they are choosing to walk the line between hinting for the shippers while maintaining plausible deniability for everyone else. An intentional position of strategic ambiguity.

My point is that even if you don't account for the OT3 tweets, the canon status of the relationship between Hardison, Eliot, and Parker is complicated. It has enough textual evidence that if it were about a m/f pairing, then at minimum their interest/intent would be considered obviously canon. However, it does not meet the higher burden of proof that general audiences need in order to clearly realize when a queer relationship is happening. So it's left in this limbo between fully canon supported and totally unnoticed.

[elodieunderglass]

Derek 📻

(OC musical ask meme - original character Derek, a nice gay American software engineer who probably paints gaming miniatures in his spare time)

Derek doesn't have his own playlist for some reason, and I tried quite hard to direct this to something else. Anything else.

But this guy just doesn't really care about being "cool" or "recent" or "having good performative taste in music." he likes what he likes.

SIGH.

I'm sorry. guy's got no sense of indie cool. "but it's so overplayed, derek," we say sadly, wincing, and he goes Yeah, that was me. It's overplayed because I played it too much.

and we're like "but you're gay, Derek, you can do better," and he's like: Yeah! but I like it. you didn't ask for your musical horizons to be expanded, you asked me for a random song.

The Magnetic Fields - The Book of Love

The book of love has music in it In fact that's where music comes from Some of it's just transcendental Some of it's just really dumb. But I I love it when you sing to me And you You can sing me anything.

I give up. I give up! I wash my hands of him.