#show critical

[sneakyboymerlin]

Me: The ban on magic was a genocide.

Fandom: B-but Gaius said it’s okay !!!! sniffle

[buzzmcnab]

[ID: a screenshot of tags on a Tumblr post that read

#leverage #eliot spencer #i didn’t send this anon #but i very strongly considered doing so after reading the og post response that OP made. #this is An Issue. #and it just annoys me that people fail to recognise both how pro-cop and pro-military the show is #[caps] and [end caps] the moments where the show spins that around and takes and anti stance to those things. #it does both. #it does the former more often #but there is nuance here. even and especially within eliot’s story. #but that’s not a good excuse for minimising the harm that the show very much does perpetuate with it’s general stances. #people just look at the nuanced moments and ignore the rest. #and like no let’s actually have a conversation about this please #let’s let characters have flaws and point out writer biases #let’s acknowledge where the show diverges from our personal beliefs. #i have… so many thoughts on this. especially regarding eliot here. #and i really wish i didn’t have to consider if i should even reblog this or not. urgh. well done OP.

End ID]

some fans will do anything to act like eliot is perfect and it’s so frustrating sometimes. i like eliot too, leverage is my favorite show, but neither eliot or the show are perfect or 100% aligned with my beliefs. and it’s okay to acknowledge that! everything in canon suggests that eliot is very pro-cop. the show itself is maybe not *as* strongly pro-cop as that one character is shown to be, but they definitely portray many cops as "the good guys" and aren’t exactly saying acab. i love the show but im not going to put it/the writers/the characters on a pedestal.

^^^

re. this post

[eruthiawenluin]

Dean: *is heterosexual, homophobic, misogynistic, racist, and a Proud American^TM; is meant to be in order to appeal to a conservative audience, and if he does anything “feminine” it’s literally for a laugh because of how solidly he conforms to cisheteronormative standards outside of that (see: his fanboying over soap operas); he is thee macho man of the show, and he not only adheres to but loves the self-serving flaws of the culture he’s a part of*

Dean Stans: Well we don’t care about the actual implications of his character being, at its base, a glorification of cishet white American patriarchy. What if I wanted to see him fuck the first white guy who is remotely available.

[zukosdualdao]

there is definitely a lot to be said (and that has been said) about the reasons for jet being written the way he is in this episode and the demonization of resistance and how that's affected by the largely white and american writing team. i agree that it's not a great look and comes across a little... performatively liberal/centrist these days.

however, that doesn't negate the fact that civilians absolutely WILL be harmed in his plan, and i don't think it's an inherently awful message to suggest that's bad and will ultimately lead to more suffering for everyone, even though i agree the way the story was written/framed was inappropriate. even if you think the adult civilians have it coming as settlers (which, we don't know the context or how willingly they went, but i concede that it complicates matters), their children certainly don't. but something else i feel gets lost in the conversation is that, unless i'm mistaken, which i don't think i am, there should also be plenty of earth kingdom civilians ALSO in that town. i don't remember if we see any at the end when sokka is warning the town - haven't gotten there yet - but while it's possible some were forced out, i find it more likely that at least some have remained. (we see that this is the case, for instance, in haru's town back in imprisoned.) with that in mind, jet is making the decision that their deaths would be a worthwhile sacrifice for them, despite the fact that he's ostensibly fighting for justice in their names.

[jellybracelet]

OKAY. So... hear me out.

I find striking similarities between how Garfield is perceived by the non-Garfield fanatic general public and how Dean is perceived by much of Supernatural fandom.

Garfield is grumpy and hates Mondays! He's lazy and fat! He loves lasagna! Meanwhile, if you go back to actually read the strips from the late 70s to 80s, you'll find a very different cat. People smush him into a box (though, he's a cat, so maybe he'd like that), but Garfield has so much more to him! He is very openly affectionate with Jon and loved to cuddle!! He is so sensitive with the mice! When no one's looking, he pats Odie on the head!

Dean's the same way. Many fans have this strange opinion that Dean is always concealing his emotions and hiding under some sort of stoicism, which is sometimes true when he's trying to put on a brave face for Sam. But there are also very many scenes when his emotions show so plainly on his face and he's confessing his love for Sam in 100 different ways.

Both characters suffered from an oversimplification and dumbing down as time went on, coinciding with a gradual lack of funny. This didn't help. Anyway, season one Dean Winchester is 1982 Garfield-coded.

[shyjusticewarrior]

Gotham writers: "That's a nice marginalized identity you got there, Oswald. Would be a shame if someone... called you a derogatory term for it."

[vaicomcas]

cw bitter Cas feelings

No but the vote between TMWWBK and Lazaras Rising is like chewing glass to me.

Of course TMWWBK has incomparable impact on me. Of course it was the only Cas-centric episode on the show which is everything.

But like, the original version of Cas died in TMWWBK. The version of Cas that was confident, powerful, the version that believed in himself. He was brutally murdered by the show's intention to reduce and villainlize him via the Winchesters.

How am I going to promote that over the birth of that version of Cas, who walked into my life in a shower of sparks?

Don't get me wrong I love the later versions of Cas too, because Cas can't be reduced no matter how much they try, no thanks to the show.

[perfectlyripeclementine]

calling my lover "mine" but not in the way that my toothbrush or notebook are mine, mine in the way my neighborhood is mine, and also everybody else's, "mine" like mine to tend to, mine to care for, mine to love. "mine" not like possession but devotion.

[hoshizoralone]

reflection

[sneakyboymerlin]

Any thoughts on s5 merwaine strained relationship (Merlin not wanting to save him in ep1/2,not hugging him in ep4, Gwaine not speaking up for Merlin when Gwen accused him of Arthur’s murder, Eira (ep12).

First off, I’m going to start with the obvious: season 5 eps 1 & 2 are painfully out of character, poorly written imposter episodes. The sole purpose of Merlin’s hesitance to ride out is to uplift Arthur’s character, making him appear more heroic and matured than Merlin, and by comparison to where we saw him in s4, without having to actually develop his character. It’s cheap, lazy writing, to put it bluntly.

But, if it helps… Merlin wasn’t just ~abandoning~ Gwaine. He thought Gwaine was dead and that Arthur was going on a fool’s errand to join him in an early grave. Regardless of the fact that Gwaine was very much still kickin’, this is the place that Merlin was coming from. If the writers really needed to take the route they did, they should have given us a scene of Merlin mourning Gwaine to make this clearer, but since the writers only care about Arthur, they only show us this information through Merlin’s concern for Arthur. But it is present in the text.

In 5x04, we can see that Merlin is frantic to get to Arthur because Arthur is walking into a trap. It’s a time-sensitive mission. The purpose of writing a scene where Merlin shoves off Gwaine’s hug is simply to express this urgency. It comes across worse because, again, the writers do not find it important to show Merlin and Gwaine after they save the battle. They only care about how these events fuel Arthur’s reputation (not to be mistaken with development… he does not truly develop).

The belief that Gwaine simply let Merlin be arrested in 5x07 is a fanon pet peeve of mine. We don’t actually see any of the knights’ reactions in the immediate aftermath— only that Merlin did indeed get thrown in the dungeons. Later, we see that Leon believes the accusation and fully supports Gwen. We also see Gwaine pursuing what he believes to be an intruder in the citadel and, later, releasing Merlin from the dungeons himself with a massive smile on his face. We can pretty easily infer from this that 1) Gwaine did not believe that Merlin did it; 2) He may have been attempting to find the real culprit; and 3) He was outnumbered by the knights who did believe Gwen/follow her orders (such as Leon). After all, if Gwaine had arrested Merlin or believed the accusation for a second, he would have shown guilt upon releasing him from the dungeons. And why have Gwaine specifically be the only knight to release Merlin otherwise?

Gwaine sleeping with Eira is not evidence of a strained friendship between Merlin and Gwaine. Rather, it ends up proving where Gwaine’s loyalties truly lay— and it showcases Merlin’s friendship with Gwaine, which has indeed been ignored in s5. The reason for this is because it is their last episode together, and the writers are aware that fans care enough about their friendship that it needed the attention promised from Gwaine’s intro ep.

Gwaine rescues a cute girl (and gets rescued in return) and takes a special interest in her because he’s attracted to her. Merlin does Gwaine a personal favor by tending to her wounds. Later, Merlin asks Gwaine to escort him into the Valley of the Fallen Kings and does not provide an explanation for why, because he trusts Gwaine to protect him. Gwaine acquiesces, leaving Eira behind even though she asks him to stay. Gwaine makes it clear to Merlin that he’s doing this for Merlin because he wants to and does not expect anything in return— in fact, he feels he’s gotten more than enough in return. Merlin trusts Gwaine enough to admit he’s lying to him, even if he won’t tell Gwaine what about. And Gwaine trusts Merlin enough to leave him to it, then leaves Merlin with his sword since he won’t accept Gwaine’s protection any further.

Offscreen, Gaius reveals to Gwaine that Merlin believes Eira to be the traitor in the court, and provides Merlin’s evidence. Gwaine takes Merlin’s word for it and sets Eira up, sending her to her execution. So, really, the whole Eira situation is functionally meant to boost our view of their selfless friendship… but a bit too late, since the writers have neglected them quite literally all season long. It’s very much a last minute “shit we forgot to care” project.

When they do give Merlin and Gwaine’s dynamic attention, though, the writers make sure to present how close they are, but they ignore this for the most part to focus on Arthur. Essentially, it’s not that Merlin doesn’t still care about Gwaine… it’s that the writers don’t. The writers literally do not care about anyone besides Arthur— not even Merlin, the titular character. Not only did they neglect to give Merlin any character consistency in s5, but they did so (and framed events in a specific way) to ensure that Arthur’s reputation would remain unstained, as he is a personified fantasy of avoiding accountability and being coddled for one’s own wrongdoings.

Fans, of course, buy into this and argue that Arthur can do no wrong because he’s “too ignorant” to know any better, instead placing blame on characters like Morgana for “proving the stereotypes right” or onto Gwen and Merlin for “coddling” him. Thus, these fans coddle Arthur, despite claiming the opposite.

The truth is that Arthur is responsible for his own actions and beliefs. Those actions and beliefs are the mass slaughter of innocent people simply because they have magic. He’s already seen more than enough evidence that magical peoples are not inherently evil or harmful, and applied this same logic to other areas of life (such as nobles vs. commoners), and found that no one is inherently superior or inferior for their birth circumstances. It is only in the topics of magic (and gender…) that Arthur believes this. But even after the Dolma saves Gwen, he still refuses to lift the ban… so, yeah, all in all you can blame the lack of Merlin and Gwaine content in s5 on the writers not wanting Arthur to either develop or be held accountable for his actions. Instead, they wanted to present a character to be lauded above all others no matter what he does. This tells you a lot about the morals of the people writing the story… and maybe some of the things they don’t want to be held responsible for. After all, 35% of all BBCM episodes come with a message of, “If you try to stop this oppressive bigot, you’re just as bad as he is!”

TL;DR: they shoved Merlin and Gwaine aside to make more room for monarchy propaganda.

[the-bluespirit]

"I'm Just Ken" wins Best Song | 21st Critics' Choice Awards (2024)

[eruthiawenluin]

I forget how awful D*an is until I go onto someone’s Spn blog

[lonely-space-ace]

just saw someone genuinely complaining about Ncuti Gatwas era because he “cries too much” and I’m like- seriously?

like were y’all here for David Tennant? The man who spent every other episode crying in the rain like the worlds most pathetic cat? What’re you on about??? This is rtd we’re talking about get real

[slayerscake]

You think they had to remix the VM symbol so they wouldn't get sued by gmail

[vaicomcas]

I find this scene kind of ridiculous.

Why did Ishim has to ask Castiel if they are all there, when there were only 4 of them?

Why did Castiel seem so happy? That she gets to be the one doing this extremely unnecessary confirmation? That she could count to 4?

[spongebob-connoisseur]

The nostalgia critic reacting to bubblebass cosplaying him in spongebob