#puritanical politics
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
Text
The 'Kids Online Safety Act' [KOSA] continues to move forward
Microsoft now endorses this legislation, which will likely help garner political support. Help counter this bill!
HELP STOP KOSA
Contact your representatives
KOSA is a bipartisan bill introduced to censor content on the internet deemed 'inappropriate' for minors. This bill is intended to target the LGBTQIA+ community and otherwise cause harm to minors.
Access to any supportive resources like queer-youth support groups, suicide hotlines, and important health information can be targeted.
#stop kosa#kosa#Kids Online Safety Act#internet#queer#trans#lgbtq#lgbqti#lgbt#anti trans legislation#richard blumenthal#the transgender#marsha blackburn#censorship#right wing#puritanical nationalism#heritage foundation#us politics#2024
2K notes
Ā·
View notes
Note
please SHOW up to make your support for Good Sex Ed, and access to information about gender and orientation in schools. keep the SOGI fearmongers out of our schools.
BUT ALSO- this 'protest'- is a smoke screen for VIOLENT TRANSPHOBES to push their DeSantis style agenda.
This is the thin edge of the wedge people! They will slippery slope their way into YOUR neighborhood.
while you're at it: go to the MANY MANY websites and FB pages by these White Supremacist Authoritarian bigots and the Christian Rightwingers who love them and REPORT them for hate speech:
here's something about the 1 million march 4 children thing (the nationwide(?) anti-lgbt education marches/demonstrations(?)) - counter protests are being organised! here's an instagram post about it: https://www.instagram.com/p/CxHTWihOLBV/
and as mentioned in the post a master doc of counter-protests can be found at bit.ly/protestlist
~~~~
#bigotry and hate#no censorship#global rise of conservative rhetoric#SOGI in school#sex ed saves lives#'dog whistles'#think of the children#puritans#puritanical politics#sex education#the 'gender agenda'#so called 'canada'#current events#canadian news
36 notes
Ā·
View notes
Text
If you are an American artist/fan, change your pixiv account region! Because there's new censorship
Number 5. If your drawing has no 'educational/scientific/artistic value' it won't be allowed to exist. These new censorship are absolute nonsense pushed by credit card company and conservative politicians. Fucking bonkers
It's the same thing when Tumblr banned NSFW and they promised that 'artistic nudity' will still be 'allowed'. I hope every purist on the internet realized that when they whine over anime fan art they are repeating what conservative billionaires and politician are pushing:
The death of art...
#pixiv#art#fan art#censorship#capitalism#this is corporate puritanism#I'm not joking#first it was patreon then gumroad noa this#puritanism#politics#twitter#news#Also the poor and queer can't even express themselves or jack off anymore because rich people and politician said nooooo#anime#uk#usa#japan
554 notes
Ā·
View notes
Text
it's always wild to me when horror media about varying new england puritan witch trials is predicated on "but what if there actually ARE witches and supernatural things?? that's the scary bit!! oooooOOOOoooo evil women, oooOOooo demons, OOOOO ghoooosts"
as if.... like.... the most compelling thing about it all ISN'T that there Were No Fucking Witches. and that puritans would kill people unprovoked for absolutely no reason except maintaining power/control.
HOW IS THAT NOT THE MOST INTERESTING HORROR TO YOU.
#the owl house is exempt from this because 1) it DOES understand the horror is the puritans and 2) it's hysterically funny.#every other movie and show made about 1600s salem being spooky supernatural though. You Are On Thin Ice .#it's hard being a horror fan when you have absolutely zero interest in 'fear of The Other' as a horror mechanism.#me cupping my hands over my mouth: BOOOOO.... I HAVE POLITICAL OBJECTIONS TO THIIIIISSSSSSS....#horror
165 notes
Ā·
View notes
Text
"KOSA is dead in the House."
[SOURCE]
RAW TEXT:
Breaking news:Ā The House Republican leadership wonāt bring up the childrenās online safety bill that theĀ Senate passed with 91 votesĀ on Tuesday.
A House GOP leadership aideĀ told us this about KOSA: āWeāve heard concerns across our Conference and the Senate bill cannot be brought up in its current form.ā
This is a bigĀ blow to the effort, which is spearheaded by Sens.Ā Richard BlumenthalĀ (D-Conn.) andĀ Marsha BlackburnĀ (R-Tenn.). And it comes just a week after SpeakerĀ Mike JohnsonĀ told us heād ālike to get [KOSA] done.ā
ā Andrew Desiderio, Max Cohen and John Bresnahan
#tw // politics#tw // recent events#text#news#legal stuff#outsourced news#punchbowl news#internet#internet news#kids online safety act#KOSA#stop KOSA#internet 2.0 and its consequences#censorship#puritans#signal boost#signal boosting
68 notes
Ā·
View notes
Text
tbh i feel like people who describe themselves as pro-kink and anti-censorship in media & fandom, and even admit that they share the values of the proship label, but get up all on their high horse about how "calling yourself proship is stupid, im not silly enough to think that fandom discourse matters" are just assholes.
like hey, it matters to me--because its a subculture and hobby space ive been heavily involved in most of my life, and i value having a hobby i can enjoy without having to see conservative values espoused constantly. if i see conservative values being espoused in my subculture, i will align myself against those values. and if my subculture has words for the stances in question, i will use them, because this is the language of the subculture and using it within said subculture is a quick way to communicate a set of ideas.
also really bold of these people to assume that my aligning myself with the 'proship' label means im too stupid to see that the ideas im against exist in larger society. like REALLY fucking bold. i dont know if ive posted about it, but i know i talk with my irl friends about how fandom is a microcosm of usamerican society and anti vs proship discourse is thus a microcosm of the encroaching conservative values in our society. im TRANS, how could i not notice the correlations?
it feels like all of this flows directly from the idea that fandom is a silly, daft, unintelligent hobby and to use the language of fandom to describe your ideas, even within fandom spaces, marks you as stupid and silly.
of course, you don't have to use the proship label, especially if you're not involved in fandom--but calling everyone who does stupid is not a good fucking look. implying that those who use it cant possibly understand the greater political forces at play in our lives is even worse. dare i say, kind of misogynist, even. part of the reason modern fandom (starting with trek) is consistently dismissed as stupid and vapid is because its always been, and still is, a heavily female-dominated space, right? thats something we've agreed on for a while, right? so why is it okay to mock fandom terms and people who participate in fandom as soon as this topic comes up?
#alv posts#proship#purity culture#<btw the reason this is the tag i use on my blog to tag proship posts#is BECAUSE i see the ideological correlations between fanpol and puritanism in politics and file them under the same tag#profiction#profic#fandom#anti fanpol#politics
31 notes
Ā·
View notes
Text
you kids would have never survived the early 2000s.
#proship#antiship#this whole little microwar is stupid as hell#do you know what we shipped back before we had concepts of 'appropriation' and 'problematic'?#twins. enemies. shota.#look up the fushigi yugi twins#look up gravitation#look up fucking loveless#these were popular published titles back then#and now y'all are just practicing puritan politics on each other over... what exactly? i havent seen anything half as fucked up now as then
318 notes
Ā·
View notes
Text
Remember That Time Bill Clinton Fired The Only Black Woman Surgeon General for Suggesting Sex Education, Only A Year After He Appointed Her?
25 notes
Ā·
View notes
Text
Remember kiddos, polygamy and polyamory was only demonized for four core reasons:
Tw: homophobia, sexism, religious commentary, political commentary, oppression
1.) America wanted more taxes
Part of the legal institutionalization of marriage is that there is tax benefits for the individual parties when they get married, and financial ties/power is attorney between married people. It becomes messy when these ties extend to multiple people/marriages and the I*RS wants they tax money, and America would rather just make an entire way of life illegal than make laws and systems that accommodate people. See point #4 for more on that
2.) Puritan culture (aka thinly veiled sexism)
Puritan culture relies heavily on systems of control that villainize sex and women (that's a whole other conversation but I won't digress), and lots of marriages/polygamous marriages having sex with each other is obviously bad bad bad!! Hard to control!! Save the defenseless women from their pimp husbands! Orgies, the devil's work! And...
3.) Homophobia
Good god, women being in marriages together! Married to a man, but what if these women end up by being married to each other by extension! And having sex with each other! And what if a woman marries more than one man! Would these men become inferior to their wives? Would one of these husbands be less dominant than another? Would the men function in these complex marriages like a woman?! Disgusting! That's gay (derogatory!) Would these husbands be having sex with each other? But that's gay and gay is bad! Sex is bad! God, purge these sinners of their Sodomy!
(Surprise surprise, homophobia has very little to do with actual gay people and has everything to do with puritan culture, control, sexism and the demonization of sex, and points two and three are actually the same thing)
4.) Christian nationalism
Polygamy and nonmonogamy is normalized and integrated with several non-Christian and alternative Christian cultures going back thousands of years, like Islam, Mormonism, feudal Japanese/samurai cultures, Hinduism, several Native American cultures, etc... even in the Bible in Judeo-Christian history and biblical era cultures nonmonogamy was normalized. Banning nonmonogamy in America is banning the right to engage in non-christian religious rite and practice. It's only something criminal to post-puritan Christians and those beliefs becoming law, regardless of other religious beliefs and practices also existing in America, is the unseparation of church and state.
So before you tell a polyamorous person "oh that's cheating with permission" or "I could NEVER do that," or "I love my partner too much to do that/cheat like that," remember that these are the institutions and the propaganda you're upholding with your judgement. Supporting/ being kind about polyamory is religious tolerance, and biting your thumb at the I*RS.
Tl:dr, the dissolution of separating of church and state, puritan culture and the sexism/homophobia associated with puritan culture is why nonmonogamy is demonized and why polygamy is illegal in America.
Tone indication/post intention: satirical and exaggerated tones criticizing longstanding institutions of oppression with the intent to explain why judging, hating or criticizing nonmonogamous practices is oppressive and a result of propaganda. This post is not intended to persuade people who practice monogamy to practice nonmonogamy instead or to demonize monogamy. It is intended to advocate for breaking the stigma around nonmonogamy.
#polyamory#polygamy#nonmonogamy#ethical nonmonogamy#enm#monogamy#toxic monogamy#puritan culture#religious tolerance#religious freedom#islam is not inherently oppressive#hijab is not oppression#puritan culture is oppression#puritan culture is sexism#puritanism is control#crash the mode#Christian nationalism#end Christian nationalism#homophobia#sexism#marriage equality#American history#political commentary#tax evasion is a moral obligation#tax evasion
21 notes
Ā·
View notes
Text
The kink at pride discourse is still around and rancid in 2024
Y'ALL LITERALLY SOUND LIKE CONSERVATIVES SHUT THE ACTUAL FUCK UP!!!! And all of this was under a video of men in speedos
Anyways, kinksters built pride parades and you puritans can die mad about it. if you don't like it, just stay home and go back to headcanoning straight celebrities as gay. i am so ashamed of my generation
#UGGHHHHHH#atp i'm convinced that these people are just Trump supporters LARPing as queer zoomers#i hate you swifties i hate you tiktok i hate you gaylors i hate you puritanism i hate you twitter#this is mainly an account for fandom discourse but now that pride is coming up it'll probably have lgbtq stuff as well#anyways i love kink at pride it belongs there end of#lgbtq#pride#kink belongs at pride#respectability politics#conservative protestantism with a gay hat
12 notes
Ā·
View notes
Text
Heritage Foundation aims to target / doxx Wikipedia editors
A Heritage Foundation spokesperson said she was not able to answer questions about the organizationās work related to Wikipedia, which editors it was seeking to identify or how it sought to ātargetā them. ā¦ The Heritage Foundation sent the pitch deck outlining the Wikipedia initiative to Jewish foundations and other prospective supporters of Project Esther, its roadmap for fighting antisemitism and anti-Zionism. ā¦
A well-funded campaign against individual Wikipedia editors by an organization like the Heritage Foundation, which is one of the most prominent conservative think tanks in the country, it seems, would be a first. Molly White, an independent journalist and Wikipedia contributor who wrote an article last week describing āthe rightās war on Wikipedia,ā said Heritageās plan to target editors was concerning: āThe document is sort of vague about what they would do once they ID a person,ā she noted, ābut the things that come to mind are not great.ā
this is made possible by the widely available tools of surveillance capitalism.
EFF [Electronic Frontier Foundation] has a guide to help protect yourself online.
#project 2025#antifa#us politics#wokepedia#wikipedia#wikimedia commons#wikiposting#wiki#trump#heritage foundation#right wing#adl#anti defamation league#puritanical nationalism#christian nationalism#zionism#religious fundamentalism#religious ex#white nationalism#colonialism#internet#privacy#surveillance#surveillance capitalism#2025
34 notes
Ā·
View notes
Text
Laughing crying throwing up bc time is a flat circle. From my presentation in church history class in 2016šš
Fucking John Winthrop my boy your Puritan ass shit is so back baby. We are once again a theocracy. Fuck u Reagan for everything you jellybean fiend motherfucker
#us politics#i guess???#mae.txt#puritans#goddamn it john#cw christianity#i want to live in the timeline where the puritan sitcom based on john winthrops life actually got green lit
4 notes
Ā·
View notes
Text
The absolute chokehold Christian purity culture has on Americans is fucking insane.
Why do I find at least 1 zoomer in almost EVERY Instagram reels comment section talking about how they want to make porn ILLEGAL?
Why do you seem to believe watching a video of people fucking is going to somehow emit an evil curse into your brain? What is wrong with you?
6 notes
Ā·
View notes
Text
its so funny to me when ppl realize that the founding fathers weren't puritans like guys actually puritanical ideals weren't as prevalent in colonial america as you were led to believe. your elementary school teacher lied to you about history just as much as they lied to you about biology. they were a small religious sect that eventually grew larger as a reactionary movement against social freedoms. most of the founding fathers thought jesus was just some guy. when they said 'under god' they didn't mean The God; they mostly meant 'i mean there's got to be some guy up there doing all this shit right? so we should all probably be good people to make him happy'. john adams said he thought organized religion was stopping us from achieving utopia. there were gay people in colonial america and everyone knew they were gay. the entire country was not massachusetts.
#shut up az#if any of the founding fathers were puritans i don't know about it#not only was jefferson a deist but so was washington#and paine and franklin! so like. several of the big guys did not even believe in jesus really#hamilton (ugh) was an Anglican which became Episcopalian so he might not have even believed in hell#james madison claimed to be anglican as well but privately said he didn't believe in half of it either#john adams my special baby boy was originally a protestant but then decided he didn't believe in jesus and joined unitarianism which is lik#deism but a little more strict about it#anyway. i love when political discourse touches on my special interest#feel free to tell the next chud in a gadsden flag shirt that you know more than him#also tell them that one of john adams's son was gay and had an affair with a general#like Abigail wasn't Thrilled about it really but they didn't throw their sick son out of their house#they took care of him and when he died they politely ignored his partner#which is the bare fucking minimum but somehow republican assholes can't manage even that much
3 notes
Ā·
View notes
Text
Some people have aggressively stupid takes on censorship, fictional content, kinkā¦. But then also in irl sex and relationships, too, and itās exhausting. If you are a grown adult wringing your hands about how you could never date anyone two years younger than you or getting your panties in a twist over regular safe consenting sex practices/acting like safe and consensual k.ink is inherently abusiveā¦. Then your brain has been so thoroughly rotted by online puritan discourse and you need to get off of twitter and experience the real world. Genuinely. Hope this helps.
#and there is a difference between having an understanding of these things and avoiding certain k.inks because of personal preference/trauma#but acting as if people who participate in and enjoy these things safely and privately are āfreaksā or ādisgustingā or immoral#is not the same thing#also please recognize the rhetoric you are parroting for fucks sake#because calling people āfreaksā and ādegeneratesā and wanting to police anything sexualā¦ not the take you think it is#this sort of thing actually enables and leads to things like a lot of sodomy laws in the us that existed pre obergefell v hodges#which classified any sex deviant from your standard piv penetrative sex as unlawful and immoral#setting a very dangerous precedent about what people can and cannot do in their own home#there are so many reasons that it pisses me off seeing these things but with the state of things in so many places right now#it baffles me when chronically online bitches swallow puritan rhetoric without a second thought and donāt see the writing on the wall#in an era of book bans and drag bans and the demonization of the lgbtq community at large#and with a Supreme Court that has shown time and again that they put their personal biases ahead of the safety and rights of constituents#I do not know how people do not recognize#this sort of reactionary shit will ALWAYS hurt marginalized people first. respectability politics will not save you when they turn on you#okay send tweet Iām just annoyed#laur speaks!#I better not get some dumbass shit on this post I am tired I am chronically and mentally ill and having a hell of a semester.#not looking for discourse. I do not have time. get blocked argue with the wall read a fucking book and learn some shit while youāre at it.
22 notes
Ā·
View notes
Text
ngl I see 500000x more posts complaining about those apparent poser baby puriteen fake horror fans who cant handle anything darker than tim burton and want all horror to be comfy and can't handle nuance or dark themes or whatever from edgy tryhards online who want to posture about how sick and twisted they are and how they love slurs and gore and don't do BABY nerd loser shit like watch cartoons š¤Ŗš than I actually see the people allegedly being complained about. I think you sound very silly if you're that upset over some teens and young adults online being softies and not liking splatter horror and writing posts about how they want more movies to have happy endings or whatever. doubly so if your whole social media presence is made up to be a display of how edgy and aloof you are but you're still pressed about these people. triply so if you're not even really engaging with anything more "fucked up" than like, the saw franchise.
#like we get it you were into steven universe discourse in 2016 and desperately want to prove that youre Cool now.#and if you're trying to turn it into an actual conversation about politics and puritanism you have the wrong target entirely#the 17 year olds with picrew icons are not actually at the forefront of conservative censorship.
27 notes
Ā·
View notes