#prove me wrong with historical data

[hadesoftheladies]

”you’re biased against men!” but am I wrong?

[suzie-shooter]

Alex Rider season 3 unhinged liveblog ramblings scribbled during first watch. Spoilers, obvs. (also fair warning, I am not particularly a fan of Tom or Kyra lol)

Episode 1 - Widow

S2 recap trivia - Alex's therapist is Molly Doran from Slow Horses and married to Alan Blunt IRL

Malta: Ok, so we're not just going to pretend it's Venice lol.

Creepy old men already hitting on Alex. Standard.

"After this we're out of leads." How do you even have any leads in the first place? Oh ok, Smithers' phone. Terrible security protocols from him, leaving that much historical classified data on it.

"Find the Widow - surely he could have given you an address?" First thing Tom's ever said I've agreed with lmao

Aaaand within a second he's back to being deeply irritating, okay.

Yassen living rent free in Alex's head, you love to see it.

"They've got this picture of me being the responsible one." Have Tom's parents actually met him?

Ooh Razim mention.

You maybe want to clean that wound before whacking a dressing on it Alex?

"Do you think you'll ever lose your appetite Nile?" Spat my drink.

Damn, no harem pants then. Scrubs up well tho.

Listing Levin in the opening credits than having him be only a S2 flashback should be a warcrime.

Episode 2 - Lab

"This weapon is called pork sword, wait, no, shit, wrong USB."

"Julia Rothman. Definitely a wrong un." Spat my drink again.

Do Crawley and Pritchard not warrant helmets and visors? Are they somehow immune to shrapnel?

So, room 6, wired to blow, yes? It's what I'd do…

Oh yeah sure guys, they're going to still be sitting there, all unmoving in the dark, for sure that's a person, and not a Massive Trap.

Thereeeee we go. Agent mince. Top of your class huh, well you're certainly at the top now, and down the sides and partially out of the window.

I know there's the whole 'characters don't know what genre they're in' thing but you are literally in the 'working for MI6 genre', you are up against people notorious for booby traps and blowing shit up, why the fuck would you touch something that hadn't been declared safe first? Apart from anything else you're fucking up the scene before forensics get there.

"I love you man." Vom.

Alex: breaks into super sekkrit lab. Also Alex: doesn't have the faintest fucking idea what he's looking at, so not really helpful.

COMICALLY LARGE BOMB KLAXON.

Episode 3 - Enemy

"Welcome to Malagosto." OooOOooh.

Maybe I'm just looking at it from a fic writer's perspective but it does seem a massive anticlimax to immediately let Tom and Kyra know Alex is okay? Like, you could have got a good couple of episodes of angst out of that uncertainty.

"Do you want me to kill them?" Oh God yes please.

Why the fuck have they plugged the USB directly into the network rather than an isolated PC? 'Hur dur we checked it first', you literally believe Scorpia are smart enough to not be bluffing about the nebulous death threat but you don't think they could hide something on the hardware? Fuck's sake lads. Amateur hour.

Is this Home Secretary meant to be Suella Braverman? Or Priti Patel maybe lol. (Equal rights and all that, and if it had been a white male character I don't think I would have thought twice about the dialogue but having both your two new female characters be immediately proved wrong/ massively patronised/ blown up ain't hugely comfortable viewing tbh).

HOW MANY FICS INVOLVING ALEX GETTING FUCKED ON THAT BED HAVE JUST BEEN BORN?

"Are you suggesting we break into a dead man's house?" "It's not like he's going to be there." 😂

"He became a very close friend of mine." Fnar.

Omg making Alex read his father's love letters is hilarious.

Alex: you could have faked that news report Also Alex: handwriting can definitely never be faked (how is Alex even familiar with his dead father's handwriting? wouldn't recognise mine)

Ugh please stop trying to make Alex/Kyra happen.

Alex up the vent shaft. I hope they're sitting casually at the top going - you could have just taken the stairs love.

If he's climbing upwards, why is his hair dangling like he's upside down? Have they filmed this like 60's Batman, and he's just crawling along a horizontal set lol.

Alex never once asks about his mother does he. Given the shagger-John route they seem to have gone down you almost think Julia would be in a better shout of getting Alex to switch sides by claiming to be his mother.

And - yeah, Alex's recruitment just doesn't feel that convincing here. Adding Tom/Kyra/Jack so much to the mix has changed the feel of his life a lot, and TV verse Alex has had a lot less fucking over by the Department by this point too. And Rothman feels too creepy to be effectively convincing him of anything.

"I want you to meet your tutor." FUCK YES FINALLY 🙌 (may have rewound that part several times lol)

Episode 4 - Recruit

Nicaragua: 18 years ago OH MY GOD IT'S HAPPENING

Baby Yassen is adorable, I'm in love.

OH MY GOD THAT'S SO MUCH BETTER THAN THE FUCKIN SPIDER THING

OH MY GOD THE REVEAL OF HIM STANDING OVER THE SLEEPING ALEX I'M DEAD

(Ok, I'm calm again. For now. We continue.)

"You killed my uncle" - all the hundreds of ways this conversation has been written over the years and Yassen's just like lol get over it 😂 (here for it tbh)

Rothman: He's one of our best Yassen: One of? Bitch.

Yassen watching Alex train like 👀👀

"Did he ever tell you you're no fun?" Oh you want to have FUN with Yassen do you?

Yassen bitchslapping Alex to fuck, both hilarious and hot.

Oh, you want to be WET wet.

"Matteo's the guy with the blanket." Why is that so funny.

Omg Yassen stepping in to protect his boy and humiliating Nile in the process lol. And Alex doing what Yassen tells him, because of course he does 🥰

"This one is my responsibility" 🥰🥰

"What about love, friendship?" Alex has only known Yassen five minutes and is already down bad.

"Kind of lonely though, right?" Yeah, Yassen needs you at his side Alex, so step up and stop being a whiny little bitch about killing people.

Never get in the first taxi, rule one of espionage.

Yep, called it. Tom's like: I'll have my fucking tip back in that case.

This scene is so dark I have no fucking idea what's going on, I thought Nile had attacked Alex, but apparently not. Is Nile officially part of this exercise or not, it seems really unclear lol.

The power of friendship and sparklerabbits saves the day, apparently. Yawn.

Jesus, we really ATE with this ep, huh.

Episode 5 - Revenge

"Would you rather your arms around me, or my arms around you?" Way to make it creepy Tom you skeevy fuck.

"Can we focus please?" "We're multi-tasking."

Sure Grendel, rock up to the super sekkrit spy base in a massively conspicuous car why don't you?

"Yassen will give you everything you need." Oh I BET he will.

Feels sloppy them not removing the diffuser from the vent tbh.

"What does this say?" Alex hasn't inherited John's neat handwriting then lol. Alex leaning into him like that > me making noises only dogs can hear.

"You've put lockpick?" "I left my last one in Nile."

Ooh, suicide pill, nasty. Kind've pointless though, given they've been left with the evidence anyway.

Yassen in Alex's bedroom again, likely place for him to be.

"I don't want you to fail. I don't want you to die." 🥹💕🥰

Yalex roadtrip, let's goooo.

Disappointed they're not making Alex do the Entrapment infrared acrobatic sequence here lol.

If this is Yassen's idea of a date it definitely needs work.

So no surprise scorpions then? Can't have shit in Detroit Malta.

"Why? Why did she kill him?" Well taking things at face value here he was a highly murderous member of a terrorist organisation, so you know, kind've her job.

Yassen does like a casual lean, doesn't he.

Episode 6 - Target

Alex and Yassen have shacked up in London, hope there's only one bed.

Now they're in the back of a van, SO many opportunities for shagging, they're spoilt for choice.

Yassen's impressed look when Alex reels off all the security details, so proud of his boy.

"What happened to my mum?" Finally he wonders lol.

"And I'm good at it. You could be too." 🥹

"You think Alex killed him?" I mean, he was also there with a notorious assassin, so probably not, y'know.

Domestic Yassen cooking Alex's dinner and also cooking him a gun lol.

Smithers' "How I've missed you" ahahaha. Smithers/Kyra much better pairing tbh.

"He's actually quite good at this stuff." Smithers' little snort lmao

Time for Alex to be blacked up/ dunked in a teabag bath/ gussied up. Although he still looks exactly like Alex afterwards, which feels less useful lol.

"You love him, don't you?" Yassen loves him more. I have to say Alex had far more chemistry with Syl, and frankly for that matter with Tom. I really don't get the Kyra agenda.

"It's a dry hole." Alex's worst nightmare.

Is Alex going to look through Mrs Jones' knicker drawer?

Episode 7 - The Shot

Mrs Jones and her tall murderous hobbit son lol. Otto really looks about 58 here.

Hope they bill him for her fucked up fridge.

Is that Bath? Oh, it is.

Mrs Jones casually throwing Alex back into play lol. Maybe she can have a little revenge for him trying to shoot her.

"Everyone breaks into houses." Jack's face lol

Ewww put him down, you don't know where he's been (Yassen's bed, almost certainly)

"Remember they can't hurt you unless you invite them in." "That's vampires."

Yassen arguing in favour of going to rescue Alex MY HEART

"Sit down. I'm going to tell you a story. About your friend, John Rider." HOLY PLOTHOLE TIMELINE PATCHING BATMAN

"John was embedded inside Scorpia for three years." Not the only thing he was embedded in by the sounds of it.

Alex seems to be hallucinating again lol.

Yassen, maybe psychoanalysing your insane boss isn't the safest thing to be doing?

"It's quite mad Julia." Yassen really gives no shits omfg

"I know my place." Yes, at Alex's side.

I like how Julia thought telling Yassen she'd killed John would do anything other than piss him off lol.

Episode 8 - Invisible Sword

"But you do owe me a new fridge." LOLLLLLL

Crawley feeling like a spare part during this lift convo, hahaha

"Smithers, you can do me some kind of tracker, right?" "Yeah, if you promise to keep it on you this time."

Alex is like ohshit I'm gonna die fr

"Not for the agents. They undid their seatbelts." Eyyyyyyyy 👉

Aww they've given him a little baby assassin outfit, how cute.

Where's Yassen, has he just fucked off to the pub?

"For the head of Scorpia, you're a really bad liar."

Laughing at all the other Scorpia agents having to listen to this convo about their boss like we are not paid enough for this shit 😬

"Everyone else is getting what they want, let me have my cereal."

Protecting his boy to the last. Yassen really is purely on Alex's side, we love to see it.🥰

And OMG HE LIVESSSSSSSS 🙌🙌🙌🙌 (I voted yes in that poll, I had faith lol)

Well that was - far more fanservice than I dared hope for, after the meagre pickings we got in the first two series. Yalex supremacy to the motherfucking end, let's go.

[friendofthew0rld]

Blog Post #2 - due 2/6/25

1. How do digital security measures reinforce existing power structures, particularly in terms of class, race, and access to resources? Although we are typically unphased by the prevalence of security cameras and data-collection systems that we come in contact with on a day-to-day basis, we don’t realize how much more prevalent they are in low-income neighborhoods, as crime is much more likely to be reported there. One fact that stuck out to me was how digital security guards are “so deeply woven into the fabric of social life that, most of the time, we don’t even notice we are being watched and analyzed” (V. Eubanks, 2018, p.16). In my own experience, I have worked a few sales jobs where we have only about 1 or 2 cameras that surveillance the exterior of the shop, where customers frequent. However, when I need to drop cash in the safe located in the office, I am usually overwhelmed by the number of cameras on the monitor, which monitors every corner of the employees' workspace. There are about 5 separate cameras that locate various angles of one single space. For one, this heightened surveillance serves as a tool to monitor productivity and compliance with policies, but also to reinforce power imbalances between employers and their employees. These cameras may also be used to target and monitor specific racial groups, as an employer may monitor a Black or Latino worker far more than a White or Asian worker holding the same job position/status.    

2. Nicole Brown poses a significant question: “Do we really understand the far-reaching implications of algorithms, specifically related to anti-Black racism, social justice, and institutionalized surveillance and policing?” (Brown, 0:14). The answer is, in many ways, complex. However, Brown brings up a very important point. Many algorithms are trained with the potential to improve many areas of our lives, however, they can prove damaging in terms of predictive policing as well as perpetuating biases and inequalities. According to Christina Swarns in an article titled “When Artificial Intelligence Gets it Wrong,” “facial recognition software is significantly less reliable for Black and Asian people, who, according to a study by the National Institute of Standards and Technology, were 10 to 100 times more likely to be misidentified than white people,” further emphasizing how algorithms may lead to false identifications, caused by a lack in diversity–highlighting the need for improvements in algorithmic technology to mitigate the harm caused for marginalized communities. In regards to predictive policing, algorithms that are trained to predict crimes utilize historical crime data, which may result in higher policing rates for those areas, when the historical data may just reflect biased policing as opposed to true criminal activity. 

3. How do surveillance and algorithms affect healthcare outcomes for minorities? In a video titled “Race and Technology,” Nicole Brown explains that since White people are recorded to make up a majority of healthcare consumers, the healthcare system’s algorithm deems White individuals more likely to require healthcare than their non-White counterparts (Brown, 2:12). Although we are typically used to having our information and activity utilized by certain social media platforms to generate user-centered content, I think the connection between algorithms and healthcare outcomes is an interesting topic to unpack, as I never have thought about this connection. “Doctors and other health care providers are increasingly using healthcare algorithms (a computation, often based on statistical or mathematical models, that helps medical practitioners make diagnoses and decisions for treatments” (Colón-Rodríguez, 2023). Colón-Rodríguez uses a case study of a woman who gave birth via c-section in 2017, and how the database was later updated to reflect a false prediction that Black/African American and Hispanic/Latino women were more likely to need c-sections, and were less likely to naturally give birth successfully as opposed to White women. For one, this prediction was false, and it further caused doctors to perform more c-sections on Latino and Black women than White women. C-sections are known to be generally safe but are known to cause infections, blood clots, emotional difficulties, and more. This case study reflects how healthcare databases will often profile individuals based on race and may make generally false predictions which oftentimes result in unnecessary–and sometimes–life-threatening outcomes for minorities (in this case, minorities with vaginas).  

4. In what ways does the normalization of surveillance threaten democratic values like free speech, freedom of assembly, and the right to privacy? Similar to feelings of surveillance that I expressed to question 1, the normalization of such surveillance in many aspects of our society may cause instances of self-censorship, suppression of dissent or negative feelings towards individuals of higher status, and the exploitation and misuse of personal data. Workers in a workplace may censor the topics they speak about for fear of customers or employers hearing such issues. People may also censor themselves when in a crowd, where phones may be utilized to monitor activity. Fear of reprisal may cause individuals to refrain from speaking out about injustices and dissent for people, policies, or events. The misuse of personal data threatens our right to privacy because we as consumers are unaware of what exactly is being utilized–and even if we do, we are not made aware of how long such data is being held and utilized. 

References

Brown, N. (2020, September 18). Race and Technology. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d8uiAjigKy8

Colón-Rodríguez, C. (2023, July 12). Shedding Light on Healthcare Algorithmic and Artificial Intelligence Bias | Office of Minority Health. Minorityhealth.hhs.gov. https://minorityhealth.hhs.gov/news/shedding-light-healthcare-algorithmic-and-artificial-intelligence-bias

Eubanks, V. (2018). Automating Inequality: how high-tech tools profile, police, and punish the poor. St. Martin’s Press.

‌ Swarns, C. (2023, September 19). When Artificial Intelligence Gets It Wrong. Innocence Project. https://innocenceproject.org/when-artificial-intelligence-gets-it-wrong/

[delta-chan]

Map Six Thoughts 2: Electric Boogaloo: Return of the Map

As it turns out, I have more scattered thoughts to air out--this time regarding some reactions to this map, because oh man. What I'm seeing is kind of amazing! Spoilers, of course...

As I've said before, I love Living Memory's gimmick.

Going from place to place, shutting off the terminals and letting the projections of the long dead go to rest--symbolic of actually letting go in the same context. Yet another lesson on the ephemerality of life, and how you must cherish the things you have now before they're gone--and they will be gone. Good stuff!

In any case--I've seen some fascinating things unfold: bargaining and denial.

People are clinging to Living Memory beyond acknowledging they can "go back to it" with new game+, coming up with reasons how and why Living Memory could "return to normal" without doing so in the course of the story going forward.

"The problem of using up energy could be solved with dynamis instead of aether!" "I think that we should restore it so Alexandrians could live there!" "We need to help!" "It might be like the Empty!" "We committed genocide to save ourselves, we're no better than ascians, we have to make it right!"

"TAKE ME BACK TO THE GOLDEN CITY"

I find this fascinating--in missing the point, these desires prove the point in an interesting sort of irony. In lieu of letting go, they react with desperation like someone about to lose someone or something, right down to things that would be impossible within the lore of the game. The lesson is driven home all the same, but the takeaway is different--and it's likely that some don't even notice.

It doesn't even matter that the existence of Living Memory is such an immense aether sink that it's destroyed worlds--there has to be some sort of way to start it up again without hurting anyone though this is very much untrue. Living Memory is like Midgar--it dips into the lifestream for energy, and once that energy is used up it is no longer available. This is why Alexandria moves--its existence, when tied to Living Memory, is completely unsustainable. The text says as much. If it requires that much energy to exist as a gold-hued paradise, it's all but impossible to keep active without destroying whatever space it's inhabiting.

As for why it should be brought back:

"We need to bring the people back because what we did was wrong" To what end? What would this accomplish? What would their quality of life be? Because for one Endless to stop existing, the entire terminal needs to be shut down.

"We need to keep it as a record of Alexandria's history" From what we saw in the Alexandria of Sphene's memories Living Memory is not Alexandria. It is has a small, idealized version of Alexandria within it--like a theme park. It is the only place within it that has any "historical" significance.

"People could live there"

Live where?

Using NG+ I turned back the clock, and the thing is--Living Memory is just that. A memory projected onto blocks of electrope.

There's nothing there.

There's legit nothing there.

The doors and windows we see in Living Memory are only there for the dead, like the food. They can go in and out of these "buildings" and see what they have to because they're data. Like sims, they can disappear into a "rabbit hole" and while for the living they entered what's essentially the shell of a building they actually went inside. Living Memory is useless to the living outside of being harvested for the electrope within.

Not a single "building" within Living Memory is an actual building.

So why would it be brought back...? It's nothing but a memory that's actively destructive to hang onto and those that are stored within its terminals are practically doomed to be there for eternity. It's not for them, it can't be for them, and it certainly isn't for the Alexandrians.

It's for you.

And no matter how much you deny it, the past is past and outside of hopping backwards with NG+ for some quick shots it is never coming back. If it did, it would not only defeat the purpose of the map but undermine a large part of the conflict of the second half of the story.

Wanting it to return is like clinging to a gravestone hoping it'll bring the dead back to life.

[itsgerges]

Best Greetings

Can Light Velocity Have Effect On The Planets Data? 

The Next Data Proves The Light Velocity Defines The Planet Data – The Discussion Provides 5 Proves For This Fact And A Preface For The Theoretical Idea Explanation

1 Preface

2 Light Defines Each Planet Orbit

3 Light Defines Each Planet Rotation Period

4 Light Defines Each Planet Orbital Period

5 Light Defines The Solar System Basic Design

6 The Energy Distribution Through The Solar System

1 PREFACE

What's the main idea behind The Solar System Origin Theory?

The theory tells – The Solar System Is One Light Beam -

This is the idea which the theory tries to prove by all means –

It tells – the planets matters and their distances are produced by light beam energy- the planets move by this light beam motion – it's one light beam behind all things in the solar system – the sky, the Earth, the sea water, the creatures, the trees and the space all of them are produced by one light beam energy and motion

This is the theory main idea

How Can I Prove This Theory?

The theory proof is a simple one because all planets data be defined by light motion�� – by that – the proof is a simple and direct

But

The light uses different geometrical rules and the light motion is more intelligent than me and for that I can't arrange all data in its correct positions to prove that (all data) be created by light motion – I can prove some of them only – but not all data

Where the theory tells a strange idea – and not all data definition be proved by light motion– the answer (pure coincidence of numbers) will be told and remove my theory

The solid fact is that – The Solar System Is One Light Beam-  

In this point I put the data which proves light motion created the planets data

I put only four tables to prove this fact (in four points of discussion) – but – I still have thousands of data which can't be arranged under any table - 

Let's provide some of them in this preface to prove this fact – actually – not only to prove this fact – but to show the beauty of light motion around the planets – and to refer to the beauty of geometry which be used behind - 

And then someone will make a favor for the science and remove from the physics book the false idea tells (Planet Data Be Created Based On Random Process, Initial Condition And Unknown Historical Factors)– Someone should shout loudly telling that – this is a false idea – a wrong concept – a bad mind -  the data be created by light motion based on geometrical rules and exact equations – means- Planet diameter, mass, orbital distance, period, velocity, inclination, rotation period and axial tilt be created based on Exact Equations (by light motion effect)

Data Group No. (1)

51118 seconds x 0.3 mkm/s = 15335 and 15335 seconds x 1.16 mkm/s = 18048 mkm

And

51118 seconds x 1.16 mkm/s = 59300 mkm

And

51118 seconds x (1.16/0.3) = 197393

Where

51118 km             = Uranus diameter

30589 days           = 2 x 15335 days = 30589 days = Uranus Orbital Period

18048 million km          = Uranus Orbital Circumference

59800 days           = Neptune orbital period (with 59300 the error 1%)

197393 days         = The Planets Orbital Periods Total

The data uses 2 light beam velocities – the known light velocity (300000 km/s) and the original light beam velocity (1.16 million km per second)

And

By light motion, based on Uranus diameter (51118 km), the data be produced are:  (Uranus orbital period, Uranus orbital circumference, Neptune orbital period and the planets orbital periods total)

The light uses planet diameter as a period of time and uses the time and distance exchangeable

My theory tells (the solar system is one light beam) and my proof is the provided data – Can This Proof Be Acceptable? - the answer (pure coincidence of numbers) be told usually – let's see the next group

Data Group No. (2)

103944 seconds x 0.3 mkm/s   = 42895 mkm

42895 seconds x 1.16 mkm/s  = 49528 mkm

42895 seconds x 0.3 mkm/s     = 12756 mkm

Where

103944 hours       = Jupiter Orbital Period

49528 km             = Neptune Diameter

12756 km             = Earth Diameter

Also – The value 42895 is Uranus number because – Uranus orbital period =30589 solar days and Uranus rotation period =17.2 hours and for that Uranus orbital period has 42895 Uranus rotation periods – in fact – my fourth equation defines Uranus diameter as a function in this value (42895) – all planets diameters be defined by this same equation – I try to show we can't escape from Uranus diameter even in another form.

Data Group No. (3)

Light (300000 km/s) moves during 165000 seconds a distance = 49528 million km where 49528 km = Neptune diameter and 160600 km = Uranus Circumference

(the error with 165000 is 2.5%)

we move through the same data by different sides – how can the data be connected as this?!

Data Group No. (4)

49528 seconds x (0.3)2 = 4495 million km

Where

49528 km             = Neptune diameter and

4495 million km  = Neptune Orbital Circumference

Understandable that (0.3) is light velocity (0.3 mkm/s)

That tells – Neptune uses its diameter to define its orbital distance by light velocity (300000 km/s) but Uranus uses its diameter to define its orbital circumference by using 2 light velocities (300000 km/s and 1.16 mkm/s)

We simply reach to the same planets different data by different using of light motion

Logically this is not pure coincidence instead its different geometrical rules be used by light motion – the data proves the idea strongly

Data Group No. (5)

17.2 h x 3600 s x 0.3 mkm/s = 18576 million km = (37100 million km /2)

This data is interesting – because – Uranus rotation period (=17.2 hours)

Light (300000 km/s) during 17.2 hours moves a distance = 18576 mkm- this distance equals accurately (half Pluto Orbital Circumference 37100 mkm) and also Uranus Orbital Circumference be 18048 mkm and has error with this distance (3%)

Data Group No. (6)

28244 seconds x (1.16)2 = 37100

28244 mkm = Neptune Orbital Circumference

37100 mkm = Pluto Orbital Circumference

This data can explain why we move in a circle of data – where – any data of the three planets (Pluto- Neptune and Uranus) leads to other data of the same three planets by light motion - this circle of data be done because light motion has a reflection between these planets

I prove the reflection of energy in the paper discussion- but I want to say – how the energy can be reflected if the space has no mechanical features? And how the energy can be reflected if no light beam moves behind – the reflection of energy be proved by thousands of data and if we remove the reflection of energy how to explain this data

Notice

Pluto moves during a solar day a distance              =406000 km and

Uranus moves during 59800 seconds a distance    =406000 km

Where

59800 days = Neptune orbital period and

(1.16)2 x (0.3) = 0.406 million km

In the next points I provide 4 tables prove that planets data be created by light motion- the tables depend on geometrical rules and mathematical system and by that the data can be understood clearly and light motion effect be proved strongly

I want to say

The light beam energy is the creator of every thing in the solar system and around us but why the universe is so rich if (one stuff) only be behind? the light uses different geometrical rules – the geometry book be written on the creatures and things be created by light motion effect, by that the useful result of the theory isn't only to know that the solar system is one light beam but more important to discover the used geometrical rules by light motion in its creation for the matters and space and how these geometrical rules cause the massive richness of the universe – the universe treasure is the geometry book written by light motion- 

2 LIGHT DEFINES EACH PLANET ORBIT

Light motion defines each planet orbit – the following table proves this fact

We use the rate (1.88 = 2π x 0.3) where (0.3 = light velocity 0.3 million km/s)

Light motion creates each planet orbit depends on its previous neighbor

Let's provide the data and its analysis

Data

Mercury orbital circumference = 360 million

Venus orbital circumference     = 360 million x 1.88                = 680 million km

Earth orbital circumference       = 680 million x 1.88                = 1280 million km

Jupiter orbital circumference     = 1280 million x 1.88 x 2        = 4820 million km

Saturn orbital circumference     = 4820 million x 1.88              = 9040 million km

Uranus orbital circumference    = 9040 million x 1.88              = 17010 million km

Neptune orbital circumference = 17010 million x 1.88            = 32200 million km

Pluto orbital circumference       =??

Data Analysis

The produced values have average errors

Venus real orbital circumference = 680 million km                            (no error)

Jupiter real orbital circumference = 4900 million km                (error 2%)

Saturn real orbital circumference = 9010 million km                (error less 1%)

Uranus real orbital circumference = 18048 million km             (error 5 %)

And

There are four planets out of the rule which are (the Earth- Mars – Neptune and Pluto)

Why?

(1)

Mars original orbit was between Mercury and Venus

Mars had migrated from its original orbit and for that Mars isn't shown in the design

As a result the next planet after the Earth is Jupiter and not Mars

Now we have three planets out of the rule!!

(2)

The rate (1.88) is a short rate to explains the light motion from orbit to another – but – the light real motion depends on its original velocity 1.16 million km /s

Notice

I suppose the original light beam velocity is 1.16 million km per second and the light consumed its energy in the space creation and for that the velocity be decreased to the known one (300000 km/s) as a result – these 2 velocities refer to the same one light beam – before the space creation it be 1.16 million km per second and after the space creation it be 300000 km/s

Let's study Venus orbit through the real motion

Venus Orbit Analysis

Mercury orbital circumference =360 million km = 310 seconds x 1.16 mkm/s

And

Light (300000 km/s) travels during this period 310 sec a distance = 93 million km

And

93 million km x 2π = 586 million km

This number is used as a period of time (586 seconds) by light motion with its original velocity (1.16 million km per second) to pass the next planet orbital circumference

586 seconds x 1.16 million km /s = 680 million km (Venus orbital circumference)

These are the details behind each planet data which we analyze

I summarized the details into the rate (1.88) which shows light motion effect on the planets orbits definition but without details –

I did that because – I want to show – the light motion moves from each planet orbit to another – because that creates one chain and one series for the solar system – means- the data shows it's One Motion which created all planets orbits and caused each orbit to depend on its previous neighbor orbit – this result I can prove simply by my first equation which defines each planet orbital distance depend on its previous neighbor orbital distance and by this equation if we know Mercury orbital distance = 57.9 million km we can conclude all planets orbital distances theoretically without observation– my first equation does that simply and sufficiently –but here –I try to show – this rule is created by light motion – It's The Light Motion Which Caused Each Planet Orbit To Depend On Its Previous Neighbor Orbit –for that reason I put the data under the rate (1.88) in a summarized form –

Now -the data details gives good answers for the questions – let's do that in following

(3)

The three planets (the Earth – Neptune and Pluto) don't follow this rule why?

The Earth Value is 1280 = (1.16)2 x 952

(Earth orbital circumference =940 million km – with 952 mkm - the error be 1.3%)

Means –

The problem is that– the light velocity 1.16 mkm/s be used 2 times (additionally) on the rule – why??

Because of the moon motion effect on the Earth motion data - and also because of the reflection of energy – the moon effect is proved by one more proof I provide later in this discussion -

let's see the rest two planets data

(4)

Neptune value is 32200

This is a important value–we analyze it in point (No.I-5) –

for our discussion – this distance defines both orbits

32200 million km = 1.16 mkm/s x 28244 seconds  And

37100 million km = 1.16 mkm/s x 32200 seconds

Means

Light (1.16 million km/s) travels during (28244 seconds) a distance =32200 million km and

Light (1.16 million km/s) travels during (32200 seconds) a distance =37100 million km

Where

28244 million km = Neptune Orbital Circumference

37100 million km = Pluto Orbital Circumference

Light uses the distances and periods of time exchangeable usually in all data

Shortly

Neptune and Pluto orbits be created (interacted and reflected) on one another – both of them depend on the value 32200 by light motion (on different two sides)

For one of them light uses a period (32200 s) and for the other light passes a distance (32200 mkm) – one orbit of them is reflected on the other –

The analysis of the distance (32200 mkm) will prove this idea clearly (point no.I-5)

The reflection of energy caused the two orbits to depend on the same value (32200) by two sides – by that- the data proves the rule and doesn't disprove it

In my first equation – Neptune and Pluto orbital distances depend on Uranus orbital distance that because the value (32200 = 2 x 16100 and 16100 x 1.16 = 18700 mkm where Uranus orbital circumference 18048 mkm – error 3.5% - this error is seen in Neptune orbital distance and not in Pluto)  

Notice

I try to understand how the data works – the using of the double value (1.16)2 or (0.3)2 is done almost as a result of the energy reflection (Light reflection) – this conclusion can be somehow correct but there's a fact can disprove it because the light moves along the solar system for that we can find powers more that means we can find (1.16)N or (0.3)N

The reflection of energy in the solar system is only three times – and I can't define How this power (N) can be produced – the next data can help

778.6 mkm (Jupiter orbital distance) = 671 seconds x 1.16 mkm/s

(where 671 mkm = Jupiter Venus distance)

721 mkm (Jupiter Mercury distance) = 629 seconds x 1.16 mkm/s

(where 629 mkm = Jupiter Earth distance)                     

629 mkm (Jupiter Earth distance) = 551 seconds x 1.16 mkm/s

(where 551 mkm = Jupiter Mars distance)

5906 mkm (Pluto orbital distance) = 5127 seconds x 1.16 mkm/s

(where 5127 mkm = Jupiter Pluto distance) (Max error 1.5%)

This data tries to show – light motion build each part of the solar system distances -here we deal with one machine (1.16) builds the whole system but in its building the rules may be violated because of the planets creation data – the machine is accurate but as a creature body – the rules can be violated and the body still can be in life –

(5)

The data details still has more useful results–because –each planet defines its previous cycle period

Let's see that in following…

Venus Orbit Analysis (More Analysis)

Mercury orbital circumference =360 million km = 310 seconds x 1.16 mkm/s

And

Light (300000 km/s) travels during this period 310 sec a distance = 93 million km

And - 93 million km x 2π = 586 million km

1.16 million km/ s  x 586 seconds = 680 million km (Venus orbital circumference)

Then

Light (300000 km/s) travels during this period 586 sec a distance = 175.9 million km

Earth Orbital Circumference =940 Million Km

Light (1.16 mkm/s) travels during the period 810 sec a distance = 940 million km

And

Light (300000 mkm/s) travels during the period 810 sec a distance = 243 million km

Mars Orbital Circumference =1433 Million Km

Light (1.16 mkm/s) travels during the period 1235 sec a distance = 1433 million km

And

Light (300000 mkm/s) travels during the period 1235 sec a distance = 370 million km

The values  175.9 days = Mercury day period, and 243 days = Venus rotation period and 365.25 days = Earth orbital period – each planet orbit defines its previous neighbor cycle period of time by light motion -  

Also

The Earth produced value (1280 mkm) be passed by light (1.16 mkm/s) in (1105 seconds) and the light (300000 km/s) passes during 1105 seconds a distance = 327.6 mkm (error 1%) (where 327.6 days = the moon sidereal year)

That shows the Earth value (1280) be produced by effect of the moon motion on the Earth data because this value produces the moon sidereal year- also – that connects strongly Jupiter with the Earth moon because the Earth Value be used for the next planet which is Jupiter (not Mars)–and that makes Jupiter depends on the Earth moon.  

But

After Mars no more cycle period be defined –

Means – the outer planets data don't produce cycle periods as the inner – I can't attribute that for Mars migration – something more strong caused this result – let's summarize this reason in following…

As it be discussed in the paper introduction- the data shows the energy is reflected from Pluto to Venus and then from Venus to Mars – by that – what was ( a distance) for Pluto be ( a period of time) for Venus and then again be (a distance) for Mars - 

by that – the data in the inner planets be in ordinary order but the data in the outer planets be in reflected order – for that reason – the inner planets (in their original order) were (Mercury – Mars – Venus – Earth) this planets order shows order in diameters, masses and orbital distances by which each greater diameter necessitates greater orbital distance- this order is reflected in the outer planets –where – greater diameter necessitates shorter orbital distance in order (Jupiter – Saturn – Uranus – Neptune – Pluto) – this reflection of order be done because of the reflection of the energy and by that the data be reflected on one another- the reflection of the energy is almost the reason which removed the cycle periods definition by light motion for the outer planets. 

Notice

Planet diameter is defined based on its orbital period – as example –

120536 seconds x (0.3)2 = 10747

Where

120536 km = Saturn diameter and 10747 days = Saturn orbital period

(we discuss all planets diameters in point no. I-4)

The data tells–

While light motion defines each planet cycle period – as we have seen in the 4 inner planets (Mercury- Venus –Earth – the Moon) – light motion defines also these planets diameters based on the cycles periods – so it's s pity the cycle period definition be stopped after Mars because the rest planets diameters can't be defined – but – spite of that – there are 2 additional planets diameters can be defined even without the cycles periods which are:

Mars

The value be produced by the Earth data is (1280) and this value is multiplied by (2) to produce Jupiter orbital circumference –

1280 x 1.88 x 2 = 4820 mkm – let's see the details in following…

Jupiter orbital circumference =4900 million km = 4224 seconds x 1.16 mkm/s

And

Light (300000 km/s) travels during this period 4224 sec a distance = 1267 million km

And - 1267 million km = 2 x 633 million km

If we use the Earth value (4820 mkm) in place of the orbit (4900 mkm) the distance 633 mkm will be only 611 mkm

6792 seconds x (0.3)2 = 611 mkm

Where

6792 km = Mars diameter

The data shows– Mars diameter still can be defined even without the cycle where Mars orbital period be 687 days and with (611 days) has an error equal (12%)

Neptune

Neptune orbital circumference = 17010 million x 1.88 = 32200 million km

The data details

Light (1.16 mkm/s) travels during 15558 s a distance =18048 million km (Uranus orbital circumference)

And

Light (300000 km/s) travels during this period 15558 s a distance = 4600 million km

(Neptune orbital distance = 4495 mkm – error 4%)

Neptune diameter be defined based on its orbital distance where

49528 seconds x (0.3)2 = 4495 million km

I try to show that – the data uses the same rules but through new situations – because the energy be reflected and that changed the situation where the rules still be used – for that reason the planets diameters be defined even without the cycles periods 

A General Comment On The Data Which Proves Light Motion Defines Each Planet Orbit

(i) 

The data proves light motion defines each planet orbit and the light moves from a planet orbit to another by a geometrical system causes the solar system to be similar to one chain or one series-

That proves ONE MOTION be the reason behind all planets orbits definition

The data explains my first equation which defines each planet orbital distance depend on its previous neighbor planet orbital distance

The planets orbits dependency is found by one motion which is light motion

The data gives a treasure to understand the real nature of the solar system

(ii)

The rate (1.88) refer to light motion effect on the planets orbits definition by using the rate (2π) –

The data tells – light motion connects each planet orbit by its previous neighbor by using the revolution circle (2π)- that means- the light motion which is in (straight line) caused the planet motion in elliptical trajectory (2π)- and that means – what's (straight line) for light motion be (elliptical form) for planet motion  

Let's use example to explain that –

Light (300000 km/s) travels in a solar day (86400 seconds) a distance =25920 million km – but the precession cycle is 25920 years – we don't know (never) this distance 25920 mkm  but we know this period 25920 years –means- the distance 25920 mkm is for light motion but we see it as 25920 years – both are one value

Similar to that – light moves in straight line – but this straight line for the planet be (elliptical trajectory) – it's a result of the observer position

(iii)

We should notice that – the 3 planets values which didn't follow the rule have the same one reason which is the using of the original light velocity (1.16 mkm/s) more than one time – this effect is repeated with the three planets proves that the rule is correct and the violation of the rule done because of the reflection of energy which caused to use the original light velocity (1.16 mkm/s) additional times

(iv)

The data proves one fact which is

(Based On One Motion All Planets Orbits Are Defined)

This fact is proved by the provided data in this point of discussion but this fact be proved by many other additional data because

My first equation proves each planet orbit depend on its neighbor orbit which can be produced only if all orbits be defined by One Motion

Also this same fact is proved by one more group of data – where – the planets distribution between the sun and Pluto depends on one map and this one map proves that one motion be found behind all planets orbits definition – this map be discussed in point no. (2)

Also the planets axial tilts analysis proves this fact tells – the planets orbits be defined based on one motion – because the planets axial tilts depend on another shows that one motion be behind all

(v)

The data proves clearly that light motion defines each planet orbit- and – Kepler stated planet orbit defines its velocity – in fact planet orbit defines its all data because the planets data be created based on the velocities rates – as following

Planet diameter, mass, orbital inclination and rotation period depend on the velocities rates and 

Planet orbital distance depend on the velocities squared rates and

Planet orbital period depend on the velocities cubic rates

I want to say - Light motion defines each planet orbit and by that each planet data be defined based on its orbit – that means- light definition of the orbit contains the definition of all data for this planet –

Notice

In next pages I insert the details of each planet orbit definition based on light motion –

Mercury

Mercury Orbital Circumference = 360 Million Km

1.16 million km/ sec x 310 sec = 360 million km

300000 km per second x 310 seconds = 93 million km

93 million km x 2π = 586 million km

The data shows light (1.16 mkm/s) passes during 310 seconds a distance = 360 mkm = (Mercury Orbital Circumference).

This is the used system and the produced distance (586 million km) is the required number to define Venus Orbital Circumference – but – the light uses this distance as a period of time (586 seconds)

The data shows– light motion uses Mercury Orbit To Define Venus Orbit

That explains why each planet orbit depends on its neighbor orbit as be proved by my first equation.

The data proves– Light Motion Created The Planets And Caused Their Motions

Venus

Venus Orbital Circumference = 680 Million Km

1.16 million km per /sec x 586 sec = 680 million km

300000 km per second x 586 seconds = 175.9 million km

175.9 million km x  2π = 1105 million km

The data tells light (1.16 mkm/s) passes during 586 seconds a distance = 680 mkm = (Venus orbital circumference).

According the system- Light should use the period (1105s) for the Earth orbit -

But it's not true – the fact is that

1.16 million km per /sec x 810 sec = 940 million km (Earth orbital circumference)

Where

1105 million km = 810 million km x (1.16)2

Means

The distance (1.16 million km) uses the velocity (1.16 mkm/s) two times –

This is done because of the moon motion effect on the Earth motion -

In fact -

Venus defines The moon orbit at first (940 mkm) and based on this orbit the Earth orbit be defined (940 mkm) – where the 2 orbits are equal that causes the double using of the value  (1.16)2 –

Notice

175.9 mkm refer to 175.9 days (Mercury Day Period) - And

810 s x 0.3 mkm/s = 243 mkm refer to 243 days (Venus rotation period)

That shows – each planet defines its previous neighbor Cycle period 

And also that shows the period 810 s is the correct one for the Earth orbit because it produces the distance 243 mkm – means- the Earth orbit follows the system correctly but the double using of the velocity (1.16 mkm/s) is happened only as a result for the moon motion effect on the Earth motion – the next data will support this fact with more proves.

The Earth

Earth Orbital Circumference = 940 Million Km

1.16 million km per /sec x 1105 sec = 1282 million km

300000 km per second x 1105 seconds = 331.5 million km

331.5 million km x 2π = 2082 million km

We use the same system to define the next planet after the Earth –

We know The Earth orbital circumference (940 mkm) be defined by the period 810 s – but here we use the period (1105s) to follow the same line of data

Notice

331.5 days (= 327.6 days = The Moon Sidereal Year) (error 1%)

The Earth orbit defines the moon sidereal year – proves that – the double using of the velocity (1.16 mkm/s) is done by the moon effect on the Earth motion.

Notice

Mars original orbit was between Mercury and Venus and Mars had migrated for that Mars orbit isn't defined in the basic system of the light motion because Mars had migrated.  (Mars Migration Theory Point no. 9)

The distance be produced by the Earth orbit (2082 mkm) will be used for Jupiter but it uses the double value (2 x 2082)

Jupiter

Jupiter Orbital Circumference = 4900 Million Km

1.16 million km per /sec x 2082 sec x 2 = 4830 million km

300000 km per second x 2082 sec x 2 = 629 million km x 2

629 million km x 4π = 7855 million km (629 million km = Earth Jupiter Distance)

The data tells light (1.16 mkm/s) passes during 2082 x 2 seconds a distance = 4830 million km = (Jupiter orbital circumference 4900 mkm error 1.4%).

Notice

The data shows – Earth orbit caused to create Jupiter orbit but the data uses only the rate (2) – that may because of Mars effect on the data – also – the other number is (629 mkm) which is the distance between Jupiter and Earth – and this distance isn't used as a cycle period – we remember in Mercury, Venus and Earth these distances were (175.9 and 243 and 327.6) which be used as cycles periods – but this part of the system is stopped here and no longer provides a cycle period may that be also Mars effect of the data.

We see clearly the light motion travels from a planet orbit to another to create them depending on one another – here we see light motion is a fact proved clearly

The produced distance (7855 mkm) will be as a period of time for Saturn orbit

Saturn

Saturn Orbital Circumference = 9000 Million Km

1.16 million km per /sec x 7855 sec = 9100 million km

300000 km per second x 7855 seconds = 2356 million km

2356 million km x 2π = 14804 million km

The data tells light (1.16 mkm/s) passes during 7855 seconds a distance = 9100 mkm = (Saturn orbital circumference 9000 mkm error 1%).

The produced distance 14804 mkm will be used as a period of time for Uranus Orbit. 

Uranus

Uranus Orbital Circumference = 18048 Million Km

1.16 million km per /sec x 14804 sec = 17173 million km

300000 km per second x 14804 seconds = 4444 million km

4444 million km x 2π = 27923 million km

The data tells light (1.16 mkm/s) passes during 14804 seconds a distance =17173 mkm = (Uranus orbital circumference 18048 mkm error 5%).

The produced distance (27923 mkm) will be used as a period of time for Pluto orbit

Notice

The distance 27923 mkm = Neptune orbital circumference (28244 mkm) (error 1%) 

Pluto

Pluto Orbital Circumference = 37100 Million Km

1.16 million km per /sec x 27923 sec = 32400 million km

1.16 million km per /sec x 32400 sec = 37572 million km

(the error between 37100 and 37572 be 1.3%)

300000 km per second x 27923 seconds = 8377 million km

The data tells light (1.16 mkm/s) passes during 27923 seconds a distance = 37572

Mkm (Pluto orbital circumference 37100 million km – error 1.3%) – but the data uses the light velocity double times –

Notice

The data shows, Neptune and Pluto orbits depend on Uranus orbit and this fact is proved also by my first equation – but – Neptune orbital circumference is created by some strange method for the system that may affect on Pluto data and caused to use the light velocity in double value.

Discussion

(1)

The massive importance of this data is (The Light Continuous Motion Through The Solar System) – shortly – all planets orbits are connected together with one another by light motion which proves that the light creates these orbits and (more important) the light creates a continuum of data through the solar system

This is the idea I provide under my theory – and this is the idea I prove by all means – the solar system is NOT separated planets (rigid bodies) – on the contrary- it's a continuum of data – one river of water – in some parts this water be in solid form (as ice) and in other parts the water be in liquid form – but all be created from the same one water –

Means- the planets matters and their distances be created from the same one source of energy which is one light beam its velocity 1.16 million km per second.

The continuum is the major discovery in the solar system vision

As a result – the planets be geometrical points on the same light beam – and the planets be similar to carriages in the same one train – and the train is the light beam - the planets move with this light beam motion.

This fact is decisive to understand the planets motions because the planets move equal distances in equal periods of time (why?) because the light beam moves one motion passes one distance in one period of time – for that – the planets have to pass this same distance and in this same period of time – and because the planets velocities are less than light velocity that necessitates to create a geometrical design to perform the basic requirement which is (the planets have to move equal distances in equal periods of time)   

(2)

The light defines each planet orbit depends on its neighbor orbit –

This fact is proved clearly in the data- this meaning is proved by my first equation 

(3)

Mars orbit isn't defined in the data because Mars had migrated from its original orbit (84 million km) where Mars original position was between Mercury and Venus and Mars had migrated to its current orbit (227.9 million km)

Mars orbit is out of the data chain but it still follows the rule for that

Light (1.16 million km/s) travels during 1235s a distance = 1433 mkm = Mars orbital circumference – and light (300000 km/s) travels during 1235 s a distance 371 mkm

Now the distance 371 mkm be used as a period of time for the Earth (where Earth orbital period =365.25 days with the number 371 the error is 1.5%)

By that Mars orbit also defines its neighbor cycle period – let's examine this feature in following…  

(4)

Venus orbit defines the distance 175.9 million km and

The Earth moon orbit (around the sun) defines the distance 243 million km and

The Earth orbit defines the distance 331 million km and

Mars orbit defines the distance 371 million km where

1875.9 days = Mercury Day Period

243 days = Venus rotation period

327.6 days = The moon sidereal year (with 331 the error 1%)

365.25 days = The Earth Orbital Period (with 371 the error 1.5 %)

Clearly each inner planet defines its neighbor cycle period where this period be produced in a distance form by light motion –

3 LIGHT DEFINES EACH PLANET ROTATION PERIOD

Data

(1)

(153.3/24)   = (29.8/4.7) = 6.4

(2)

(24/24.6)     = (24.1 x 2 x 0.3) /(4.7π)

(3)

(9.9/24)       = (29.8 x 2 x (0.3)2)/ (13.1) 

(4)

(10.7/24)     = (24.1 x 2 x (0.3)2) /(9.7)      

(5)

(17.2/24)     = (6.8 x 2 x (0.3)) /(5.4) (error 5.5%) 

(6)

(16.1/24)     = (5.4 x 4 x (0.3)) /(9.7)

Discussion

Data No. (3)

(9.9/24) = (29.8 x 2 x (0.3)2)/ (13.1) 

Where

9.9 hours     = Jupiter Rotation Period

29.8 km/s    = Earth velocity

13.1 km/s    = Jupiter velocity

Let's analyze the data in following

(1)

The data tells –Jupiter rotation period be defined as a function in the period (24 h) by using the light velocity (300000 km/s) as a reference and Earth velocity as a partner in motion

We know that – Jupiter uses The Earth moon velocity in its planet diameter equation  here – Jupiter rotation period be defined based on the Jupiter and Earth velocities –and- the definition be done by using light velocity as a measurement and reference because the motion be done by light motion –

We need to observe the period (24 h) in Jupiter equation because this period be used for all other planets as a reference because this period is the used one by light motion and because the equation defines Jupiter rotation period by using the light motion as a reference that makes the equation uses the period (24 h) which is the time period of the light motion

Please remember -  light supposed velocity (1.16 million km/s) travels in the solar day period (24 h) a distance = 100733 million = (The planets orbital circumferences total)  that explains why the equation uses (24 hours) as a reference for all planets rotation period -

(2)

This equation (data) is important because it shows the planet rotation period be defined based on the velocities rate and based on the planet rotation  period this planet diameter be defined by my fourth equation – that shows the data connection

In this point we need to observe the following –

This equation is reflected one because Jupiter equation to define its diameter uses also a reflected form (also Saturn does that) – for that reason this equation which defines Jupiter rotation period uses also a reflected form.

For that reason the light velocity (300000 km/s) be used two times for Jupiter and Saturn- this using is produced because Jupiter and Saturn equations to define their diameters use reflected forms- please review planet diameter equation Point no. (E) 

(3)

The equation uses the rate (2) with all planets but with Neptune it uses the rate (4) -  

Notice / Jupiter diameter equation uses the moon velocity in place of the Earth velocity in the current equation – that tells Jupiter motion be a partner inside the interaction between the Earth and its moon motions- please remember that Jupiter orbit definition by light motion depends on the Earth and moon data Not Mars.

Notice

The Earth and Pluto equation is the basic one in this data we discuss it at end because it explains the whole process clearly .

Data No. (4)

(10.7/24)     = (24.1 x 2 x (0.3)2) /(9.7)      

Where

10.7 hours   = Saturn Rotation Period

24.1 km/s    = Mars Velocity

9.7 km/s      = Saturn Velocity

Saturn equation is a typical one  to Jupiter Equation where no any change is found – completely the equation tells the same meaning clearly and confirms the using of the velocities rate to define the planet rotation period under the effect of light velocity (300000 km/s) –

We notice only (Jupiter and Saturn) use light velocity (300000 km/s) two times because of their reflected forms in planet diameter equation- all other planets use the light velocity one time only  

Data No. (5)

(17.2/24)     = (6.8 x 2 x (0.3)) /(5.4)                              (error 5.5%) 

Where

17.2 hours   = Uranus Rotation Period

6.8 km/s      = Uranus Velocity

5.4 km/s      = Neptune Velocity

Uranus equation shows the ordinary form of the equation and proves the reflected form be used by Saturn and Jupiter – the equation has a great error more than 5%

Also

Uranus uses Neptune velocity which is used also in its equation to define its diameter

Data No. (6)

(16.1/24)     = (5.4 x 4 x (0.3)) /(9.7)

Where

16.1 hours   = Neptune Rotation Period

5.4 km/s      = Neptune Velocity

9.7 km/s      = Saturn Velocity

Neptune Equation is a typical one for Uranus equation but no error be found in it (the error is less than 1%) –

The equation also proves Jupiter and Saturn use reflected equations.

Data No. (2)

(24/24.6)     = (24.1 x 2 x 0.3) /(4.7π)

Where

24.6 hours   = Mars Rotation Period

4.7 km/s      = Pluto Velocity

24.1 km/s    = Mars Velocity

Mars equation changed numerator and denominator but can't be a reflected one because it use light velocity one time only – and this is done as a result of the Earth data effect on Mars motion – this meaning will be more clear with the Earth equation discussion – where – The Earth and Mars both depend on Pluto velocity that causes a deep interaction in the data can be explained with the Earth Equation discussion. 

Data No. (1)

(153.3/24)   = (29.8/4.7) = 6.4

Where

153.3 hours          = Pluto Rotation Period

4.7 km/s      = Pluto Velocity

29.8 km/s    = The Earth Velocity

We have 2 points to refer in the Earth equation

(1) No light velocity be used here – And – Earth uses the period 24 hours

(2) The 2 planets velocities rates be equal their days periods

That means – the machine aim to create this result as a goal – means – the machine goal is to make Earth and Pluto velocities rates be = their days periods! Why? because by that …….

Pluto moves in its day period (153.3 hours) a distance = 2.59 million km and

The Earth motion distance in its day period (24 hours) be = 2.57 million km and

The moon displacements total in its day period (29.53 days) = 2.59 million km

The three distances are equal (error 1%)

This equality is an essential requirement for the planets motions- later we will discuss the rate of time be used for the planets motions- but here I refer to it shortly

The rate of time depends on the velocities rates – means- Earth velocity = 6.3 Pluto velocity by that (one hour of Earth clock be = 6.3 hours of Pluto clock) –

As a result (153.3 hour of Pluto clock will be = 24 hours of the Earth clock) 

Why is this necessary? Because the Earth and Pluto move equal distances in these 2 periods – and if these 2 periods be equal in (the amount of time) – that makes the 2 planets move (equal distances) in (equal periods of time) –

And why do we need that?? ….Because

The solar system is one light beam – the planets move as carriages in one train and the light motion is this train engine – now – the light moves one motion and passes one distance in one period of time – means – all planets have to move this same distance in this same period of time – shortly – the planets have to move equal distances in equal periods of time – the light uses its velocity along all planets to enable the Earth and Pluto to move equal distances in equal periods of time (without light motion help)  means – the light created the system by which the planets (can) move equal distances in equal periods of time (without light velocity) depending on the planets own velocities only –

I want to say –

We should not look at the data individually for each planet because the leader is one which is the light motion and the leader uses the players for different jobs to perform the required general task –

There's one more reason – we should discuss with my fourth equation discussion – but I write this reason here and the respectful reader can review it after the fourth equation discussion (Planet diameter definition equation)– The equation uses the moon cycles equality as its base because the moon orbital period = the moon rotation period=27.3 days and by that the rate (s) in the equation be equal (=1)  

And

The equation depend on 3 basic points which are–the moon, Saturn and Pluto because

The moon where   (The Moon Rotation Period = The Moon Orbital Period=27.3 d)

Saturn where         (Saturn Rotation Velocity    = Saturn Orbital Velocity)

Pluto                     (The Solar System End Point)

For Pluto – the Equation should create equality of DISTANCES

This distances equality be produced by the rate (153.3/24) = (29.8/4.7)

And because of that –

Pluto moves in its day period (153.3 h)  a distance = 2.598 mkm = the Earth motion distance in its day period (24 h) = the moon displacements total in its day period (29.53 days) (error 1%)

These equality of the three distances be essential for the planet diameter equations to enable the equation to work sufficiently – that explains why Pluto moves in solar day a distance = 406000 km = the planets diameters total= the moon orbital apogee radius 

Please review Planet diameter equation (my fourth equation) (point no. E)

Notice /this point data depend on the planet diameter equation for that the equation can be used as a reference for this data – but the equation doesn't use light velocity – I try to show that – light motion defines the data based on geometrical rules for that we can conclude the data by light motion or by this rule the light use  in the data creation. 

4 LIGHT DEFINES EACH PLANET ORBITAL PERIOD

Data

(1)

4879 x (0.3)2        = 88 x 4.93 (error 1%)

(2)

12104 x (0.3)2      = 224.7 x 4.93

(3)

12756 x (0.3)2      = 365.25 x π

(4)

3475 x  (0.3)2       = 327.6 (error 5%)

(5)

6792 x  (0.3)2       = 611

(6)

142984 x  (0.3)2   = 4331 x π (error 5%)

(7)

120536 x  (0.3)2   = 10747  (error 1%)

(8)

2 x 51118 x  (0.3)          = 30589

(9)

49528 x (0.3)2      = 4495

(10)

2390 x (0.3)         = 717

Data Analysis

The data provides the planets diameters in order – where – (4879 km is Mercury diameter – and 2390 km is Pluto diameter) –

Each diameter be used as a period of time for light motion based on the rate (1 km = 1 second) – By that (Mercury diameter 4879 km be used as 4879 seconds)

The rate (0.3)^2 refers to light velocity (0.3 million km per second) be used for 2 times

The produced values are the planets orbital periods in order – by that -  (88 days = Mercury orbital period, 224.7 days = Venus orbital period)

We have three exceptions which are: 

Mars – where – its orbital period = 687 days but the produced number is 611

Pluto– where – its orbital period = 90560 days but the produced number is 711

And

Neptune – its number is 4495 where Neptune orbital distance = 4495 million km – that means – the data produced Neptune orbital distance in place of Neptune orbital period – there's a geometrical reason for that we discussed in point no. (3)

Mercury and Venus use the rate 4.93 = (π2/2) for their data – this also be done for a geometrical reason.

Discussion

The using of light velocity (0.3 mkm/s) two times be done for the data consistency and the energy reflection - the idea is that – planet diameter is considered as a period of time where my fourth equation defines each planet diameter as a function in its rotation period – that makes the diameter as equivalent to a period of time –

and 

The light uses this period to pass a defined distance – and – then uses the distance (as a period of time) to pass another distance – by that – the first value and the third one be of the same type (time) and the second be a distance – that’s seen in the data  the input is a planet diameter (period of time) and the output is a planet orbital period (period of time) that's why the light velocity is used two times – Uranus shows an exceptional for this rule for geometrical necessity 

Where Uranus motion distance per solar day equal 0.6 million km (2%) – that effect on the data and caused Uranus to use the light velocity one time only

Notice

I wish to make my idea as clear as possible – the solar system is one light beam – and the light creates each planet matter and its distance – and by that – all data in the solar system be created by light motion – this is the absolute real fact –

And the solar system is so accurate machine and its data be defined accurately-

But – as we see the light creates the solar system and causes its motion by the geometrical rules be used by light motion – here – there are many effects cause to deforms the used rules – this idea is simple for us – for example we know the body makes recovery from any wound may suffer but sometimes the wound be so great and the recovery process couldn't produce the same original result but created some deformation in the body   

For that the rule be used clearly but not so strictly – because – if the rule be violated the machine will not stop- instead – it created a configuration as we see in the data

For our discussion

We have 3 planets out of the rule why? because Mars And Pluto Has Migrated-  Mars original orbit was between Mercury and Venus and Mars had migrated – also Pluto was The Mercury moon revolves around it – but Pluto had migrated with Mars migration – that explain why they don't follow the rule –

Then the third planet (Neptune) – Neptune orbital circumference be created after Pluto migration – this story is discussed in point no. (9) and Neptune orbital circumference is distinguished in all data – also in the light definition of the planets orbits Neptune orbit is so distinguish because the light defined Neptune and Pluto orbits reflected to one another – that makes Neptune orbit to be distinguish among the planets data – please review the light motion definition of the planets orbits (Point no. I-2) 

Notice

In the first table which defines each planet orbit by light motion – Jupiter data produced also the distance 611 million km

Means we can use this distance to define Mars diameter by its orbit data – but still the orbital period isn't defined  - but that connects the data together to show that this all data depend on one motion which is the light motion

And –

Also Neptune orbit be defined by light motion based on Uranus orbit by (different way) – because Neptune and Pluto orbits be defined reflected on one another – shortly

28244 x (1.16)2 = 37100

Where

228244 million km = Neptune Orbital Circumference

37100 million km = Pluto Orbital Circumference

That explains why Neptune diameter be defined based on Neptune orbital distance and not Neptune orbital period –

I wish the data proves clearly my theory

Let's look as deep as possible

If the planets are rigid bodies and revolve around the sun by the mass gravity – why does data makes this mistake and use Neptune orbital distance in place of its orbital period? this strange behavior how can be explained based on the classical description? – BUT – very simple by my theory I can explain that – because – the light uses the period of time and distance exchangeable and this is one case in which the light has obligation to use a distance in place of a period of time and vice versa – it’s a natural result of the energy reflection which is done in the solar system three times –

the energy reflection at Neptune is proved in light motion definition for the planets orbits (point no. I-2) and here in this point the data supports this proof and also in the next point no. (I-5) more details proves this same fact – which forces the light to define Neptune diameter based on its orbital distance and not its orbital period. 

5 LIGHT DEFINES THE SOLAR SYSTEM BASIC DESIGN

Data

Group No. (1)

32200 million km                    = 0.3 mkm/s x 107470 seconds

32200 million km                    = 1.16 mkm/s x 28244 seconds

37100 million km                    = 1.16 mkm/s x 32200 seconds

2 x 4830 million km      = 0.3 mkm/s x 32200 seconds

2872 million km            = (0.32) x 32200 seconds

25920 million km                    = 32200 days x 2 x 0.406 mkm/day

32200 x 24.6 hours x π  = 103944 x 24 hours

Group No. (2)

32200 million km cos (28.7 deg)       = 28244 million km

32200 million km sin (34.4 deg)       = 18048 million km

32200 million km sin (53.6 deg)       = 25920 million km

32200 million km sin (16.1 deg)       = 9010 million km

32200 million km sin (8.8 deg)                   = 4900 million km

32200 million km sin (17.5 deg)       = 4840 million km x 2

Group No. (3)

32200 days x 4.095 million km                  = 131860 million km

32200 days x 3.024 million km                  = 97373 million km

32200 days x 2.574 million km                  = 82883 million km

32200 days x 2.4 million km             = 77280 million km

32200 days x 2.082 million km                  = 67041 million km

32200 days x 1.13184 million km     = 36445 million km

32200 days x 0.838 million km                  = 26984 million km

32200 days x 0.5875 million km       = 18920 million km

32200 days x 0.46688 million km     = 15034 million km

32200 days x 0.406 million km                  = 25920 million km/ 2

Discussion

The distance 32200 million km is the solar system central distance – the next data refers to its importance

(1)

100733 million km = 32200 million km x π

Where

100733 million km = The Planets Orbital Circumferences Total

32200 million km  = The different distance between Pluto Orbital Circumference and Jupiter Orbital Circumference (32200 = 37100 - 4900)

(2)

Neptune and Pluto orbits depend on this distance because

Light original velocity (1.16 mkm/s) passes in a period (28244 seconds) a distance = 32200 million km

And

Light original velocity (1.16 mkm/s) passes in a period (32200 seconds) a distance = 37100 million km

Where

37100 million km = Pluto Orbital Circumference And 

28244 million km = Neptune Orbital Circumference

The data shows that – Neptune and Pluto orbits be reflected on one another – where the light motion uses the same value for both planets orbits – in the discussion of the distance 32200 mkm we will analyze this subject to more deep analysis.

Notice

The analysis of the distance 32200 mkm depend on the group no. (3) but the rest groups be found to refer to the effect range of this distance – we refer to all data details and analyze deeply the third group –

Let's start the data analysis  

Group No. (1)

32200 million km                    = 0.3 mkm/s x 107470 seconds

32200 million km                    = 1.16 mkm/s x 28244 seconds

37100 million km                    = 1.16 mkm/s x 32200 seconds

2 x 4830 million km      = 0.3 mkm/s x 32200 seconds

2872 million km            = (0.32) x 32200 seconds

25920 million km                    = 32200 days x 2 x 0.406 mkm/day

32200 x 24.6 hours x π  = 103944 x 24 hours

10747 days           = Saturn orbital period

28244 million km          = Neptune Orbital Circumference 

37100 million km          = Pluto Orbital Circumference 

4900 million km   = Jupiter Orbital Circumference 

2872 million km   = Uranus Orbital Distance

25920 million km          = light (300000 km/s) motion distance in a solar day

0.406 million km = Pluto motion distance per solar day

103944 hours       = Jupiter Orbital Period

Group No. (2)

32200 million km cos (28.7 deg)       = 28244 million km

32200 million km sin (34.4 deg)       = 18048 million km

32200 million km sin (53.6 deg)       = 25920 million km

32200 million km sin (16.1 deg)       = 9010 million km

32200 million km sin (8.8 deg)                   = 4900 million km

32200 million km sin (17.5 deg)       = 4840 million km x 2

28244 million km          = Neptune Orbital Circumference 

18048 million km ��        = Uranus Orbital Circumference 

9010 million km   = Saturn Orbital Circumference 

4900 million km   = Jupiter Orbital Circumference

28.3 degrees          = Neptune Axial Tilt     

34.4 degrees          = 2 x 17.2 degrees (Pluto orbital inclination)

17.4 degrees          = The Inner Planets Orbital Inclinations Total

We notice that – Neptune orbital circumference be defined based on the distance 32200 mkm by (Neptune axial tilt) and Uranus orbit definition depend on Pluto orbital inclination (17.2 deg) – also – the inner planets orbital inclinations total (17.4 deg) defines the distance (2 x 4840 mkm) where Jupiter orbital circumference be 4900 million km (error 1%)

In fact – the four inner planet orbital circumferences total = 3413 million km    

But (4900 = 3413 +1433 "Mars orbital circumference =1433 mkm") 

Means- if we consider the Earth moon orbital circumference around the sun be equal Mars orbital circumference – the five planets orbital circumferences total be =4840 mkm- this value depend on the angle (17.4 deg)

In fact – I don't know why the solar system considers the moon orbital circumference around the sun = 1433 mkm – this fact I have met frequently in different data 

Now – let's analyze deeply the distance 32200 mkm in the data third group

Group No. (3)

32200 days x 4.095 million km                  = 131860 million km

32200 days x 3.024 million km                  = 97373 million km

32200 days x 2.574 million km                  = 82883 million km

32200 days x 2.4 million km             = 77280 million km

32200 days x 2.082 million km                  = 67041 million km

32200 days x 1.13184 million km     = 36445 million km

32200 days x 0.838 million km                  = 26984 million km

32200 days x 0.5875 million km       = 18920 million km

32200 days x 0.46688 million km     = 15034 million km

32200 days x 0.406 million km                  = 25920 million km/ 2

In this data – each planet in order uses the value (32200) as a period of time (32200 solar days) and the data shows the passed distance be each planet motion during this period of time

Let's analyze these distances- I start with the three last planets (Uranus, Neptune and Pluto) 

Data Analysis Part No. (I)

32200 days x 0.5875 million km     = 18920 million km

Light (300000 km/s) travels a distance 18920 million km in a period (63000 s)

Notice (during 204500 s x 0.32 = 18500 million km "error 2.5%") and

204500 = 4 x 51118 s where 51118 km = Uranus diameter

 32200 days x 0.46688 million km = 15034 million km

Light (300000 km/s) travels during 49528 s a distance = 15034 million km (error 1%)

Where 49528 km = Neptune Diameter

32200 days x 0.406 million km                 = 25920 million km/ 2

Light (300000 km/s) travels during 25920 seconds a distance = 7770 mkm

Pluto circumference 7510 km (with 7770 mkm the error 3.5%)

Shortly light motion defines each planet diameter based on its motion distance BUT with different using

We have to look deeply at the data because no outer data be used – the data be limited clearly on the input and the rule be used strictly but the using of light motion be changed – that proves a reflection of energy be found between these planets because the light deals with some data as a distance and the other data light uses as a period that makes each planet orbit be reflected on the other – this fact we have seen in the Neptune orbit definition by light motion in point no. (I-2) 

The light deals in both sides and on each side there's a planet and that makes the planets be reflected on one another

Shortly

Uranus diameter be defined by  (the passed distance /(4x 0.32)

Neptune diameter be defined by (the passed distance /0.3) and

Pluto diameter be defined by (the passed distance x 2 x 0.3)

We deal with the same data but light motion changes its approach to the data

Data Analysis Part No. (II)

Here we deal with the next three planets (Saturn- Jupiter- Mars)

32200 days x 0.838 million km = 26984 million                   = 0.3 mkm/s x 90000 s

Saturn moves per solar day a distance =0.838 million km –

The number (90000 km) isn't related to Saturn almost! We need to know what's happening – let's see Jupiter motion 

32200 days x 1.1318 million km = 36445 million                 = 0.3 mkm/s x 121484 s

120536 km = Saturn diameter (with 121484 the error 1%)

Jupiter moves per solar day a distance =1.13184 million km –

By that Jupiter passes in 32200 days a distance = 36445 mkm-  and light (300000 km/s) passes this distance in 121484 seconds

Shortly

Saturn diameter be defined by Jupiter motion and not by Saturn motion! why?

Because the energy be reflected inside Saturn and by that the data before Saturn be reflected on the data after Saturn-  as a result – Saturn velocity be reflected with Jupiter velocity as many other planets – let's see that in following

(1/0.838) = 1.1318 (error 5%) and

(1/0.406) = 2.4     (error 2.5%)  and

(1/0.46688) = 2.082 (error 2.5%)

where

0.838 mkm daily            = Saturn Velocity

1.1318 mkm daily                    = Jupiter Velocity

0.406 mkm daily            = Pluto Velocity

2.4 mkm daily                = The Moon Velocity

0.46688 mkm daily        = Neptune Velocity

2.082 mkm daily            = Mars Velocity

The six planets velocities are reflected on one another – shortly – if the planet diameter definition uses the rate (1/planet velocity) – in this case the definition will use the velocity (1.1318 mkm daily) because it's Saturn velocity in form (1/A)

I want to say –

The reflection of energy changes the light method to use the data – and if the reflection changes the method in Saturn case the velocity will be (1.1318) and not (0.838) -  

I wish I can explain how the data be created – the light motion is so intelligent and deals by different methods with the planets data according to the different situations  around and for that the data be used in reflected forms

32200 days x 2.082 million km = 67041 million                   = 0.3 mkm/s x 223470 s

(But 223470 s = π x 71132 s= π2 x 22642 s)

Mars velocity daily is 2.082 million km – and Mars moves in 32200 days a distance = 67041 mkm – light (300000 km/s) passes this distance in a period 223470 s

Where 71132 km = Jupiter radius and

21346.6 km = Mars Circumference (with 22642 km the error 6%)

Means – Jupiter and Mars diameters be defined by the same equation depends on one another – we notice that Jupiter diameter be defined also by Mercury motion 

Data Analysis Part No. (III)

Here we deal with the rest four planets (Mercury – Venus – the moon – The Earth)

32200 days x 4.095 million km        = 131860 million km = 0.3 x 439530 s

(But 131860 s x 0.3 mkm/s = 39560 mkm)

Mercury (4.095 mkm daily) moves in 32200 days a distance = 131860 mkm, The light passes this distance in (439530s and 449197 km = Jupiter circumference – error 2%  )  

Mercury motion defines Jupiter circumference because Jupiter diameter = 8 planets diameters total and by that Jupiter refers to a collective behavior and Mercury is the head of the group –

(Notice/ Mercury day period =176 days because the 9 planets velocities =176 km/s)

This data is explained in the theory discussion – I refer to it to prove that – Mercury uses the collective behavior as Jupiter

Please note,

Light (300000 km/s) during 131860 s moves 39560 mkm – where

40000 km = the Earth Circumference = The 5 Planets Diameters Total

For that the number (40000) is produced by all inner planets and no any planet diameter be referred here – all planets data refer to the total (40000)

32200 days x 2.4 million km           = 77280 million km = 0.3 x 257600

The moon velocity daily is 2.4 mkm and in 32200 days it passes a distance = 77280 mkm which be passed by light (300000 km/s) in 257600 s = π x 40892 s

(40892 is different from 40000 by error 2.5%)

Again the data refers to the Earth circumference 40000 km = the 5 inner planets diameters total

(notice 257600 hours = 24 x 10747 days "Saturn orbital period")

32200 days x 3.024 million km       = 97373 million km = 0.3 x 29200 s

Venus velocity daily is 3.024 mkm and in 32200 days it passes a distance = 97373 mkm which be passed by light (300000 km/s) in 29200 s = 3600 x (16.1/2)

(where 16.1 h = Neptune rotation period)

32200 days x 2.574 million km       = 82883 million km = 0.3 x 276276 s

The Earth velocity daily is 2.57 mkm and in 32200 days it passes a distance =82883 mkm which be passed by light (300000 km/s) in 276276 s = (π x 88000 s)

(the moon daily displacement is 88000 km)

A General Comment Of The Analysis Of The Distance 32200 Mkm

(1)

Many ideas be seen as strange in this distance analysis – at least – we accept the planet diameter be considered as a period of time for many reasons – first because of my fourth equation (planet diameter equation) which defines each planet diameter as a function in its rotation period – the equation be tested in point no. (E) – also the planet diameter be used as a period of time is a feature of data discovered and proved for example

Jupiter (13.1 km/s) moves during 10921 s a distance = 142984 km = Jupiter diameter

Uranus (6.8 km/s) moves during 7510 s a distance =51118 km = Uranus diameter

Pluto (4.7 km/s) moves during 10921 s a distance =51118 km = Uranus diameter

Pluto (4.7 km/s) moves during 51118 s a distance =2 x 102536 km = Saturn diameter

Pluto (4.7 km/s) moves during 2 x 120536 s a distance =1.1318 mkm

(1.13184 mkm = Jupiter motion distance per solar day)

10921 km = The Moon Circumference  and 7510 km   = Pluto Circumference

The data shows the planets diameters be used as periods of time (for planets motions) also and not only for light motion – the fact is proved simply

(2)

The planets diameters are defined by light motion because light defines all data in the solar system – by that – this data is a part of the whole map based on which the light created the solar system and all planets data and the space data in its geometrical design and features

The solar system is one garment and the light motion is the needle and spindle by which the textile be created – the whole garment be created by light motion as the needle of tailor which makes the garment- this part of data is a point of the massive amount of data which the light used to create the solar system

(3)

We need to notice here only the massive effect of this distance – because- it shows different methods for light motion using and by that this distance can be used as a mirror which shows the details of the energy reflection inside the solar system   

It's very important distance because we can move with its details to see how the energy be stored in the outer planets distances and how it be reflected – also we can see as clear as possible each part of the energy reflection and how this is done technically

The energy reflection is a massive proof for the space mechanical features

The energy reflection be proved in details in point no. (3)

6 THE ENERGY DISTRIBUTION THROUGH THE SOLAR SYSTEM

Here we analyze the energy distribution through the solar system – this distribution can help to see clearly how the machine works

(1)

We accept the space is energy – and – I claim that the energy be reflected in the solar system – in fact – the reflection of energy is the most strong point of my paper proves – it's simply the point of the paper fighting – the energy reflection proves the space has mechanical features

Now – the simple analysis can refer to the dilemma – because – the outer planets have great distances (energy) and if this energy be reflected toward the inner planets it will be as a flood of water moves toward a city and houses. 

It's not very clear – how the inner planets can store this huge energy because their distances are so short and can't store such massive energy

The fact is that – the data is reflected on both sides – that means- thousands of the planets data be reflected on one another – this reflection of data should depend on a geometrical reason –

(2)

As example for the data reflection

The inner planets original order (Mercury – Mars – Venus – Earth) shows the planets order in their diameters, masses and orbital distances – Because Mars had migrated from its original orbit (between Mercury and Venus), Mars deformed this good order

The order shows clearly (Greater Diameter Necessitates Greater Orbital Distance)

The outer planets order is reflected clearly (Jupiter- Saturn- Uranus –Neptune – Pluto) the order shows that greater diameter necessitates shorter orbital distance – this is a clear reflection of data

The question again - if the outer planets energy be reflected how the inner planets short distances can store this massive energy?     

The inner planets don't store the energy – instead – The Energy Be Used To Produce The Sun Rays.

(3)

The sun rays creation theory is discussed in details in the theory – let's summarize the idea in following…

The solar system is one light beam – the light minimum velocity is 300000 km/s- the planets are ships sail over the sea and the sea is the light beam

By that the sea water and the ship move by the same velocity – by that – the solar system moves by the velocity (300000 km/s) – the sun is a stationary point has no motion relative to the sea water velocity –

How can this stationary point be created?  it's the vortex in the sea water

The planets revolve around a point in space – their revolutions cause to create 2 velocities on both sides of this point – the two velocities are equal and opposite in direction – the total velocity on this point be Zero- the revolution wave moves by the sea wave velocity and by that the point be stationary relative to the planets revolution velocity and to the sea water velocity – by that – the revolution causes to create a different velocity equal the sea water velocity (300000 km/s) and we see the sun as a light beam – why??

Because the creature brain uses light velocity (300000 km/s) in thinking – that means- when the creature looks at a light beam it be similar to a light beam looks at another light beam – the special theory of relativity tells (if one light looks at another light beam) they will see each other as matters (Particles)- why? because no difference in velocities    

For that we see all motions with velocity (300000 km/s) as matters around us– the sun motion velocity is (Zero) that creates the different velocity (300000 km/s) and caused to see the sun rays as light beams

(4)

Shortly

The planets motions energies be stored in the outer planets massive distances to store massive amounts of energy (because the light beam be produced based on quantum) and the energy be reflected from the outer planets to the inner planets – and the inner planets use the energy to produce the sun rays by that the energy is not stored in the inner planets distances but be used immediately

Also – that means- the sun is not doing nuclear fusion to create its rays but the planets motions energies total be used as a source for the sun rays production

Notice

The Earth mass equal the rest inner planets masses total (error 1%) – if we imagine that – from a great gamma ray the inner planets be created – and – the Earth be the great electron and the other inner planets be the great positron –

Where– the great electron means (its atom has a positive charge and electrons revolve around) and the great positron means (its atom has a negative charge and positrons revolve around)-

This idea has a advantage because it creates an electric field between the inner planets – this electric field can be so useful to create the sun rays because the sun rays creation depends on a geometrical design and the electric field can provide the accuracy by which the geometrical design can be produced – here we have important notice – because the outer planets store massive amounts of energy (the accuracy here isn't necessary) but the inner planets use this energy to produce the sun rays (or the stationary point) where this process needs accurate geometrical effects which can be supported simply by the electric fields – also – the creation of electron and positron  by gamma ray is experiment be proved empirically – only – I suppose – after the inner planets matters creation the original light beam is not finished but created also the outer planets from the same one light beam energy.

(5)

Why Is The Data Reflected Between The 2 Sides?

The energy be reflected from Pluto to Venus and then from Venus to Mars –

There's another reflection be done inside Saturn for the wave be sent from Pluto to Venus

The reflection of energy caused to reflect the data- but – in details – the reflection caused (the distance) to be used as (a period of time) and another reflection causes (the period of time) be used as (a distance) one more time – by that- the planets which have many reflections can put their data in ordinary order but the planets which have one reflection only have to put their data in reflected form – that shows how the data be reflected on both sides –

Let's use one example

(a)

Jupiter orbital circumference =4900 million km

Uranus orbital period = 4900 days x 2π  

This data depend on the reflection be done inside Saturn, that makes the data before Saturn be reflected on the data after Saturn 

We need to follow the rate (2π) because this is the key of the data understanding

(b)

Another reflection be done between Venus and Mars for that

680 million km     = Venus orbital circumference  

687 days               = Mars orbital period - And

224.7 days            = Venus orbital period

227.9 million km = Mars orbital distance

The data shows clearly that the rate (2π) be found between Mars and Venus

(c)

Pluto orbital distance 5906 million km = Earth orbital distance 149.6 million km x 4π2

We see the data clearly

The two rates (2π) be balanced by (4π2) between the Earth and Pluto

But

The rates (2π) be used between (A Distance On One Side And A Period On Another) 

For the Earth case – the rate (4π2) be used between 2 Distances

The data which is reflected in the outer planets, be reflected one more time in the inner planets and by that the inner planets show ordinary order of the data but the outer planets data still be reflected. 

Notice / there's one more (2π) between Mars and Saturn because Saturn orbital distance = Mars orbital circumference and this (2π) be used also between two distances.

Thanks a lot – kind regards

Please read

Planet Diameter Equation Shows The Matter Origin (The Proves Discussions)

or

Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292

Physics Department-  Physics & Mathematics  Faculty 

Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow   (2010-2013)

Curriculum Vitae                 https://www.academia.edu/s/b88b0ecb7c

E-mail                            mrwaheid@gmail.com, mrwaheid1@yahoo.com

                                      gergesgerges@yandex.ru                   

ORCID                          https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147

Facebook                       https://www.facebook.com/gergis.tawadrous

VK                                 https://vk.com/id696655587

Tumblr                           https://www.tumblr.com/blog/itsgerges 

Researcherid                   https://publons.com/researcher/3510834/gerges-tawadrous/

Google                                https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=2Y4ZdTUAAAAJ&hl=en

Livejournal                     https://gerges2022.livejournal.com/profile

Pocket                                                                     https://getpocket.com/@646g8dZ0p3aX5Ad1bsTr4d9THjA5p6a5b2fX99zd54g221E4bs76eBdtf6aJw5d0?src=navbar

PUBLICATIONS

box                                https://app.box.com/s/47fwd0gshir636xt0i3wpso8lvvl8vnv

Academia                       https://rudn.academia.edu/GergesTawadrous

List of publications         http://vixra.org/author/gerges_francis_tawdrous

Slideshare                             https://www.slideshare.net/Gergesfrancis

[bonediggercharleston]

That is nitpicking a tangent when the actual point was that people are aware of how easy it is for them to cheat so they are statistically more likely to do it. Address that, not the word "advertised" which is just accurately describing how people are being made aware of AI. If you want to say I lost you at the mention of advertising and public awareness, I do not think you are actually trying to follow. Reminder that you started with: "This is what people actually do." Not personal choice but a declarative statement of "this is how students do research with chatGPT". When I listen to teachers they complain about phony essays being handed in.

That was a tangent, checking results is not relevant to this conversation, which is about practicing skills which chatGPT atrophies by doing it for you. You are using it as a search engine but have not demonstrated any superior quality of chatGPT as a search engine, except it gets things wrong pretty often.

Actually OpenAI has started it's largest funding round ever, which means they are asking for more money. Their methods are hyperscaling, which is an increase in capability but the gains are disproportionate to cost. Their new models are being pushed back and not seen to be as big a jump as from 3.5 to 4. They are more in debt than ever. I am not aware of the cost per token going down or the subscription prices going down. Even "cheap" versions like deepseek which are cheaper to train have higher consumption in return. Any claims of it getting cheaper while the market leader got more expensive (the longer GPT5 takes to be released the more expensive it will be) and more addled with debt are dubious. This is magically hoping the tech will beome something it is not. It is a counterfactual and you cannot tell me when it will get profitable because nobody knows if LLMs are even the future of AI. This was a tangent though, the discussion was about ChatGPT atrophying your mental skills.

absolutely negligable, most PCs run all day and the AI compute centers consume orders of magnitude of energy more than most countries. The energy consumption is one of the externalities that make LLMs are really harmful technology, but again, the point here is that ChatGPT will make you a worse thinker if you use it to brainstorm, even in your very personal idealized, individual way of doing things which ignore larger societal scopes that OP was talking about.

It is not in anybody's favor, it is a caution against using easy parallels like you are doing, which are historical anecdotes. the research on the effect on people is clear: use your mental faculties less, and they get worse.

I am a millennial too and uh no, there was no backlash, those things got almost universally adopted. Most people talked about how great they were and apple sold millions of them, immediately making profit. And again, irrelevant anecdote with no connection to AI. You are pretending that because a new technology had a breakthrough, this next one will and that is just a complete fallacy. The commonality is that you think it is useful, which is just an opinion.

Shifting goalposts by claiming the 2 year old data is too old instead of finding data to contradict it. Did churn rate change on git repositories? Was it because AIs got better or because the amount of people using copilot changed? You would not know because you assume the data exists to prove your point, but you did not provide it to prove it.

An economic bubble is not the same thing as an apocalypse and AI is in a bubble now. This is another instance of strawmanning. WE have had several economic bubbles pop in our lifetimes. Also hella way to answer a hypothetical: "It wouldn't happen".

"It is a personal choice to let your brain atrophy." The state of AI bros, ladies and gentlemen. Ignorance is freedom. That is fascist thought. Just straight up. No critical thinking, just "well if they wanna be bad at critical thinking let them". I have to share a world with them. People can not know things, that is normal, but willful ignorance is malicious. You have made an argument in favour of cognitive impairment of human beings and that is the stupidest things I ever heard. There is very little personal choice in this because you deciding to be stupid in a society inflicts your choice upon society. If it affects others it is not personal. Sure you can use chatGPT to think for you but the problem is that GPTs are math-illiterate calculators that are worse at thinking like humans and real calculators are just really good at solving math.

Okay, I say AI should not replace any other tool for writing cause it sucks. Because people are smarter without it. Also all the other tangentially mentioned reason.

"Abstaining from AI will make me look like a douche". That conclusion is non-sense. As for the rest, you clearly used ChatGPT for research, not your opensource project. clearly one works better. and that's the problem: everybody uses it for free, nobody wants to pay for it. that's why they lose money. that's why the bubble will pop. cause if you have to pay for it you could just google shit again.

this one is easy: plato was wrong because writing records works differently from memorization and writing shit down actually helps memorization. chatGPT does not help memorization, it does not help you develop cognitive abilities. it does the work that would let you develop your thinking skills.

a final strawman. i said people do work only if they like to or if they need to. which is why people will use short cuts for work they don't like. and the easier the shortcuts, the more people will use them. which is the original point you got wrong. that ties a nice bow on it, don't it?

"what did students do before chatgpt?" well one time i forgot i had a history essay due at my 10am class the morning of so over the course of my 30 minute bus ride to school i awkwardly used by backpack as a desk, sped wrote the essay, and got an A on it.

six months later i re-read the essay prior to the final exam, went 'ohhhh yeah i remember this', got a question on that topic, and aced it.

point being that actually doing the work is how you learn the material and internalize it. ChatGPT can give you a short cut but it won't build you the the muscles.

[jcmarchi]

Scratchpad Technique: Structured Thinking with AI

New Post has been published on https://thedigitalinsider.com/scratchpad-technique-structured-thinking-with-ai/

Scratchpad Technique: Structured Thinking with AI

The scratchpad technique fundamentally changes how we interact with Large Language Models (LLMs). Unlike traditional prompting where we simply state our request and hope for the best, the scratchpad technique creates a structured thought process that both you and the LLM can follow.

Consider this common scenario: When asking an LLM to analyze customer purchase patterns, a typical prompt might simply request the analysis directly. The result? Often a rushed or misaligned response that misses key considerations. Here’s where the scratchpad technique proves transformative.

Instead of diving straight into the solution, the scratchpad technique introduces a critical planning phase. By using <scratchpad> tags, you create a space where the LLM can:

Map out its approach before execution

Break down complex problems into manageable components

Identify potential pitfalls early

Allow for course correction before investing time in the wrong direction

The real power lies in transparency. When you can see how the LLM plans to tackle your request, you can catch misunderstandings immediately and guide it toward your intended outcome.

Building Your First Scratchpad

The basic structure of a scratchpad prompt consists of three key elements:

The Initial Request: Present your task clearly, but don’t stop there. Include context about your goals and any specific requirements.

The Scratchpad Directive:Direct the LLM to plan its approach using <scratchpad> tags. Be specific about what you want to see in the planning phase.

The Review Loop: Examine the proposed approach and refine as needed before proceeding with the full response.

Let’s walk through a practical example. Rather than simply requesting a market analysis, here’s how you can structure it:

A basic scratchpad response will look something like this:

This planning stage reveals the LLM’s intended focus areas. If you notice it’s missing crucial elements – perhaps battery technology innovation or charging infrastructure partnerships – you can redirect before receiving a complete but off-target analysis.

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

Vague Planning Directives: Don’t just ask the LLM to “plan its approach.” Request specific elements you want to see in the scratchpad, such as methodology, data points, or analytical frameworks.

Skipping the Review Step: The scratchpad isn’t just for show – it’s your opportunity to course-correct. Take time to evaluate if the proposed approach aligns with your needs.

Insufficient Context: While the scratchpad helps organize thinking, it can’t compensate for unclear initial requirements. Be specific about your needs, audience, and intended use of the information.

Beyond the Basics

When tackling LLM projects, crafting the right initial prompt becomes crucial.

Here are some prompt ideas for multi-layered challenges. Remember to include as much context in the form of attached documents or text as possible:

Product Launch Strategy Prompt:

“I need to develop a comprehensive product launch strategy. Using <scratchpad> tags, break down your approach for analyzing market positioning, competitive landscape, and go-to-market planning. Consider potential information gaps and dependencies between these elements before providing any recommendations.”

Budget Planning Prompt:

“Help me create a departmental budget for next year. Before providing numbers, use <scratchpad> tags to outline your methodology for considering historical data, growth projections, and resource allocation. Flag any assumptions you’ll need to make in this process.”

Project Risk Assessment Prompt:

“We’re launching a new enterprise software system. Before listing potential risks, use <scratchpad> tags to map out how you’ll approach risk identification across technical, operational, and business dimensions. Include your framework for prioritizing these risks.”

Each of these prompts:

Clearly states the end goal

Requests specific planning elements

Identifies key areas requiring consideration

Encourages systematic thinking before solution generation

Note: These prompts are fairly simple examples. You can get very detailed and complex depending on the use case.

The key is being explicit about wanting to see the planning process before getting solutions. This prevents rushed responses and ensures thorough consideration of all relevant factors.

As mentioned, these prompts can (and should) be further customized by:

Adding specific industry context

Including known constraints

Specifying required outputs

Mentioning particular methodologies you want to be considered

Remember: The more complex the task, the more important it becomes to see the LLM’s planned approach before it generates solutions.

Advance Your Prompt Engineering Skill Through <scratchpad>

Learn <scratchpad> Prompting →

The scratchpad technique helps us transform the interaction between humans and LLMs. By implementing this structured approach, organizations and professionals can move beyond simple prompt-response patterns to achieve more sophisticated, reliable outcomes. This methodology proves particularly valuable in environments where accuracy, consistency, and transparent reasoning are paramount to decision-making processes.

[riearchivistfornow]

Jesus – Is He the only way?

Teens Xcite 2014.08.17

Jesus – Is He the only way?

Is Jesus really the only way?

John 14:6 NIV

Jesus answered, “I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me.

Matthew 16:13 NIV

When Jesus came to the region of Caesarea Philippi, he asked his disciples, “Who do people say the Son of Man is?”

The Mordern Versions of Jesus 1) A good man Jesus was a good man be ause he was the Son of God because he came down to earth and into the world.

2) A misunderstood rabbi A very talented Jewish teacher which never meant to start a new religion

3) Revolutionary Jesus "Jesus as the Messiah who came to overthrow the unjust power."

4) The Ecumenical Jesus Ecumenical: anything and everything is okay.

the truth is that all these four views of Jesus is not true.

"If you are believing in a false Christ, If your preach a false Christ you are cursed."

If you hold on to any of these views, you are not safe. Through the wealth of data uncovered by the historical and archelogical research.We are able to measure the accuracy of the Bible. It is thus accurate to the claims of the Bible being true.

Facts:

1. Jesus fulfilled prophecy.

Fakes can't fulfil prophecy. They can't direct the circumstances of their birth and death. Jesus' fulfillment of such prophecies shows that he is no fake. Jesus Christ was the credientialed, expected, authoritative Messiah for whom the world has been taught since the Garden of Eden

2. He made amazing claims about himself

He claimes that he is the Son of God He made claims that he will rise from the dead

3. Supernatural Powers

-turned water into wine -multiplied five loaves and two fishes -raised from the dead The excessive skeptism of many liberal theologians stems not from an evaluation of available data, but from an enormous predisposition against the supernatural.

4. The Empty Tomb

If we do not believe that he rose from the dead, then our preaching is useless and so is our faith.

Proofs: ~The Empty Tomb. First claim is that the desciples stole the body. This is proven wrong because of the two Roman soldiers and then roll away the tomb stone. Also his burial cloth is neatly folded, which did not make sense. Secondly, they went to the wrong tomb stone. If they did that, people would have shown that he is still dead.

~The Holy Women. Women did were of second class and did not hold abilities to claim witnesses.

~Jesus Apostles New Courage The courage that they had to finally come out of hiding because they new the truth.

~The Changed Attitude of James. He became a strong leader from once being a skeptic

~The Five Hundred Witnesses. There were five hundred witnesses there to prove it

~The Conversion of Paul He was persecuting the Church and he had an encounter with Christ, but then became one of the most powerful missionaries

~ They died for Jesus No one would dare to die for a lie

5. Transformed Lives

Everyday there are many people who still are coming to know the Lord Jesus Christ and the rate of people who are knowing the Lord Jesus is accelerating and escalating.

Possibilities: ¤ Jesus is the greatest liar in the human history ¤Jesus is a lunatic ¤Jesus is not a lunatic nor a liar but that Jesus Christ is the Lord

He's a Liar-No He's a lunatic-No He's the Lord-Yes

[undead-moth]

I'm an English Composition teacher at a university, and I completely prohibit the use of generative AI/LLMs in my class. I'm adamantly opposed to their use, so don't get me wrong when I say that this study is bunk science and should not be taken seriously.

Methodology

The study relies on self-reporting. All of their data is based on surveys done by participants, who were asked to record when they perceived themselves to be critically thinking. Even setting aside that any of the participants could have lied, how objectively can they assess themselves? Worse yet, what does their perception prove? It's not only unreliable, it also doesn't prove anything.

2. Meaningless units of measurement

"Critical thinking" is not, and can't be, a factually defined concept. Whether or not someone is critically thinking, or capable of critically thinking, is essentially a matter of generally agreed-upon opinion.

As you can see here, they are still using the word "perceived" because there is no other option. It is impossible to quantify someone's critical thinking.

Quality is also a matter of perception.

They even admit in their limitations section that this caused problems while surveying participants and may have contaminated their data. Some of their participants didn't understand that just because they were able to do something easily, or quickly, does not mean they were able to do so because they were critically thinking with ease, which goes back to my first point. I doubt this is the only example of participant misunderstandings. This is, frankly, beyond a limitation. Even if everything else about this study was airtight, this would make their results meaningless anyway. If your participants have a different understanding of what critical thinking is, or what it means to critically think than you do, and they are providing your data, you can't meaningfully conclude anything from the data.

3. Recruitment

The way they selected participants was by recruiting people who regularly use generative AI/LLMs. Not only does this mean that there's no control, but we also don't know anything else about these participants that may be affecting their preexisting critical thinking skills. This contributes to there being no legitimate way of speculating if generative AI/LLMs is influencing how much or how little they're using critical thinking when they use generative AI/LLMs and when they're not.

4. This study proves nothing, but more importantly, this study wasn't even on what they are claiming it was on.

The highlighted portion here is quoted by the 404 Media article above, and it is taken out of context. In the introduction, they explain that an "overreliance" on any form of automation has historically been theorized to have the potential to lead to "atrophy."

First of all, even if this is true, this study didn't follow these participants over time, nor were they required to use generative AI/LLMs exclusively for every daily situation that might require critical thinking, which would be the only way to ensure "overreliance" and the only way to determine if "overreliance" led to "atrophy."

They are hypothesizing that using generative AI/LLMs could potentially "atrophy" critical thinking skills in the event someone "overrelies" on it.

They even compare "overreliance" on generative AI/LLMs to writing, printing, calculators, and the internet - none of which have been proven to "atrophy" critical thinking skills and given that the alternative to generative AI/LLMs is literally writing, which they implicitly argue doesn't atrophy critical thinking skills, I think it's fair to say their hypothesizing here isn't objective.

Plus:

"Overreliance" has the same issue "critical thinking" has. It's a matter of generally agreed-upon opinion. How do you measure overreliance? What constitutes overreliance? Based on the definition above, isn't it possible for people to accept incorrect recommendations or make errors of commission while not "overrelying"? If so - and it is so - how can you ever know if "overreliance" is truly at fault, or even at play?

This also doesn't account for the fact that many other daily situations require critical thinking skills, and many other daily situations don't require critical thinking skills. Even if someone became "overreliant" on generative AI/LLMs, that would not mean they aren't critically thinking regularly in other daily situations, including daily situations that require the exact same critical thinking skills generative AI/LLMs are hypothetically enabling people not to use. If someone uses generative AI/LLMs regularly, does that stop them from reading in their free time? No, obviously not. So...couldn't that mean that even if someone "overrelied" on generative AI/LLMs, that they could still prevent "atrophy" elsewhere in their life? There's also the issue that even if generative AI/LLMs enables users not to critically think, that really doesn't in any way prove that will lead to "atrophy." I would argue that folding laundry doesn't require critical thought, and most people fold laundry regularly - yet it has never led to "atrophy." Doing something that doesn't require critical thinking regularly doesn't by default lead to an inability to critically think, especially if someone is critically thinking in other areas of life - which, most people, whether it seems like it or not, are, and every day.

And this is important to stress entirely because they are arguing that only by becoming "overreliant" on generative AI/LLMs could critical thinking skills "atrophy." They are not, even hypothetically, arguing that just using generative AI/LLMs itself "atrophies" critical thinking skills, which makes Emanuel Maiberg's (author of this 404 Media article) choice in title outright negligent misinformation.

There is no current evidence that using generative AI/LLMs "atrophies" critical thinking. There is some - unprovable - evidence - based on self-reported surveys - that generative AI/LLMs might - because confounding variables are not accounted for - enable someone to do work that typically requires critical thinking without having to critically think - no different than a calculator.

I am not even remotely of the opinion that generative AI/LLM use is comparable to the calculator, but that does not change the fact that all this study proved is that generative AI/LLMs might not, in all instances, require users to critically think, and that does not prove anything.

Here they pretty much admit that it is entirely hypothetical that using generative AI/LLMs could lead to "atrophy." They argue that anyone who doesn't exercise their critical thinking skills regularly can lose them. (This, by the way, we already knew.) They reason that it's possible someone who "overrelies" on using generative AI/LLMs might not be exercising their critical thinking skills regularly, and therefore it could enable the "atrophying" of their critical thinking skills.

This reasoning relies on ignoring confounding variables, which makes it unsound.

Additionally, even if what they are hypothesizing could possibly happen, it would not mean there is anything innately about generative AI/LLMs that causes critical thinking "atrophy." It would only mean that someone who never exercises their critical thinking skills loses them, which we already knew, and was true long before generative AI/LLMs could arguably help enable - not cause - enable people to lose critical thinking skills.

I'll end this firstly by saying that those of us, myself included, who have an ethical objection, and a practical objection to generative AI/LLMs, (I personally still believe that generative AI/LLMs make it so that someone who hasn't yet developed certain critical thinking skills can avoid ever having to develop them, which is I suppose arguably an adjacent line of thinking to this study) firstly need to keep an eye out for their own confirmation bias - I know how tantalizing the title of that 404 Media article is. I know when we see a title like that, we feel very vindicated in our stance - but we have to be vigilant. We have rational and justified objections to generative AI/LLMs that I believe will in time be scientifically and/or factually reported - but this study isn't one, and many won't be. We can't fall prey to misinformation or anti-scientific thought just because it says what we want to hear.

Secondly, I would encourage everyone whose first thought when they read that title was vindication to consider that the people who conducted this study, consciously or unconsciously, may have an ulterior motive for arguing that generative AI/LLMs cause critical thinking "atrophy." Science is never conducted, nor accepted, in a social vacuum, and I would honestly bet that virtually all studies aiming to prove, or worse, claiming to prove - as this one does - that critical thinking "atrophy" exists, are trying to create a scientifically-supported case for "degeneracy," meant to justify eugenics. This is also something we need to be vigilant about.

One of the common mistakes I see for people relying on "AI" (LLMs and image generators) is that they think the AI they're interacting with is capable of thought and reason. It's not. This is why using AI to write essays or answer questions is a really bad idea because it's not doing so in any meaningful or thoughtful way. All it's doing is producing the statistically most likely expected output to the input.

This is why you can ask ChatGPT "is mayonnaise a palindrome?" and it will respond "No it's not." but then you ask "Are you sure? I think it is" and it will respond "Actually it is! Mayonnaise is spelled the same backward as it is forward"

All it's doing is trying to sound like it's providing a correct answer. It doesn't actually know what a palindrome is even if it has a function capable of checking for palindromes (it doesn't). It's not "Artificial Intelligence" by any meaning of the term, it's just called AI because that's a discipline of programming. It doesn't inherently mean it has intelligence.

So if you use an AI and expect it to make something that's been made with careful thought or consideration, you're gonna get fucked over. It's not even a quality issue. It just can't consistently produce things of value because there's no understanding there. It doesn't "know" because it can't "know".

[razorblade180]

It’s been written

Scara:*sitting under a tree*

Aether:Yoooo, Scara!

Scara:Ugh, what do want this time? I thought I completed my mandatory training for toda-

Mona:*walks up* Hey.

Scara:…Hello. Aether, who’s your friend?

Aether:Hehehe~

Scara:What?

Mona:*opens coin purse* New I should’ve trusted my gut. *hands Aether mora* I should’ve known he’d try playing stupid.

Scara:Playing? Wait, hold on! Do you-

Mona:Remember you’re a jerk that outwitted? Yes. Do you really think you could really hold power over a genius like myself?

Aether:She did forget.

Mona:*red* But I also put it things back together on my own.

Scara:How the heck did you manage that?

Mona:Simple. People come to me for divinations. It’s often for someone who wants validity of my skill to ask me to tell them something about themselves I wouldn’t know. Recently I’ve been getting them “wrong.”

Scara:Maybe you’re not as good as you think.

Mona:No! They’re incorrect because they’re misremembering! I got concerned about my so called errors and started looking at a variety of stars; only to find certain things of great, significant events in peoples’ lives contradict what my own memory and historical data showed.

Aether:In summary, the stars still tell the truth of a person’s life. I had her look at Kazuha’s constellation and then told her what the word of mouth would be if she were to ask someone. As a way of proving I wasn’t trying to trick her.

Mona:Not that I’d believe you would. After that, he had me look at Fischl’s during the time of the meteor shower where I saw you, a complete stranger I’ve forgotten. Needless to say, I was curious to find out why I couldn’t remember. It took some time but I eventually found your constellation.

Scara:I thought astrologist had strict rules to follow?

Mona:Normally I wouldn’t look a people’s lives randomly for personal gain, but when all my readings and memories are now called into question, dramatically impacting my job as a whole, it’s no longer just personal. It’s my responsibility to figure out what is happening so I can help others properly. *folds arm* So…Balladeer, what an interesting time you’ve been having.

Scara:Hmph, don’t call me that. So it’s not as if you’ve truly regained the memories, but you fond what was hidden. I’ll admit, maybe the stars have their merit after all.

Mona:Regained or not, witnessing the memories has certainly ticked me off. To think you’d try something so arrogant, I’m not letting you off the hook. I’ll be keeping a close eye on you.

Scara:To think you’d miss me so badly. If you want dinner then just say so.

Mona:I can’t believe I spent time remembering you. You’ll need a full course meal and then some before I let any of this go!

Scara:…Fine. Don’t go blabbing about your grand revelation though.

Mona:As if most people would believe me. I’m begrudgingly silent for various reasons. I’ll live with the satisfaction that despite your work, not only couldn’t you have escaped Aether, but my knowledge as well.

Aether:Congratulations. You’re stuck with us.

Scara:….

Scara:There’s worse fates I suppose.

[sagaduwyrm]

I write something! I did it! The muse didn't even suddenly abandon me partway through!

Against the Smoke of the City (I Marched)

There is a city called Gotham that doesn't exist, but by god the Daily Planet is going to find it. Or Gotham is so cursed the outside world doesn't even know it's there, but that's nothing in the face of a reporter's curiosity.

Just off I-nine in New Jersey, there is a city that doesn't exist.

Clark knows this because for weeks the Daily Planet has been researching every piece of evidence they could find to prove the city that doesn't exist, did exist.

It started with a piece on the richest companies in the world where the numbers just wouldn't add up. It was Marlene Samson's first big piece, and she was crying when she came to Dean Jones, the Daily Planet's best eye for tax returns and accounting, certain she had to have done something wrong. The rest of the Planet assumed that would be the end of it, extending Marlene their sympathies for running into so many problems on her first big job, but certain it would be solved soon with Dean looking at it.

It was not.

Three weeks later, Dean came in with raccoon eyes, greasy hair, and a four foot pile of files that he had to make Clark help him carry.

Apparently, Marlene didn't do anything wrong, it was just that there was a whole multi-billion dollar company somewhere on the East Coast that existed in government tax data, agreements with other companies, and nowhere else.

It should be noted that even as a company that regularly reported on alien invasions, Superman's love life, and Lex Luthor's newest schemes, this was not the conspiracy the Daily Planet expected to find on an average day.

The crown jewel of Dean's coffee-fueled hallucinogenic research binge was a series of photos of an unfamiliar logo for one Wayne Industries on a variety of products from luxury cars, to prosthetic limbs, to the coffee maker in the office, often covered by a sticker from whatever company didn't want to admit they were reselling the products of a nonexistent corporation. Under each logo was a minuscule maker's mark that said, "Made in New Jersey."

This was about when the whole thing stopped being a personal project and became a company-wide mystery that the Daily Planet was determined to solve.

Diane and Thea were the next to come up with something. They were the history buffs of the group, the ones who wrote about the historical value of such-and-such building or how this event a century ago affected the city today. Real interesting stuff, if a little niche for some of their readers.

"The New Jersey Mystery" it was called.

It was a whole thing for anyone interested in the historical urban development of the New England area. Clark didn't claim to understand it, but Diane said that a large number of historians, amateur and professional, believed that there was something off about the socio-economic development of New Jersey, particularly in the lack of big cities. According to the historical and modern shipping routes, there should have been a harbor city as big as Metropolis in the area, but there just… wasn't. It was, frankly, baffling and mildly concerning to most historians, according to Thea.

It wasn't hard to guess that a missing city and a missing company were more likely than not connected.

Catt Grant was the next to dig something up, finding an old piece from the gossip section about some kind of scandal, written by one Vicki Vale. Dale, the IT guy, managed to find some emails from her time in Metropolis that identified the mystery city as sitting on the Mullica River, next to the Great Bay. Mrs. Vale complained extensively about the swamp land around the city, apparently caused by a dam being built where it shouldn't some fifty years ago, now spread to the entire area. The waters were known to be toxic enough to kill a swimmer, but not dangerous enough for the municipal government to do something.

That was just the beginning of it. Jack found police reports about a mafioso that was to be sent back to New Jersey to be tried with the rest of his group. Stella traced charity funds back to a foundation in the city. Sawyer and Thea managed to make a model of the supposed dam, putting an exact location to the place.

So.

Just off I-nine in New Jersey, there is a city that doesn't exist. They don't know its name, size, or population, just that money comes flowing out, legally and illegally, but people stay in.

And it is Clark and Lois's responsibility to prove that it does exist, and, hopefully, to figure out why it's on no map, spoken by no human tongue, and invisible to satellites and Superman's gaze.

+++

They take a bus first. They'd both prefer to drive themselves, but James Pierceson managed to get an interview that suggested that only people who'd been before could find the city they were looking for. A train was out too, as even if the conductor was a native of the place, it still only had a small chance of passing through the city. That was all James had gotten out of his interview, though. Nothing about the city itself, the company that drew Daily Planet's eyes, nothing. Just how to get in, and a warning to make sure they could still get out afterward.

The bus is their only real option. It's a creaky old thing, grimy in all the wrong ways, but it had the only driver they found that knew where they were going.

Clark stares out the window as they ride, eyes on the road so he knows how to come back if he needs to. He watches as the woods slowly change into swamp land, filled with strange, nasty , brackish water that smells too much like corpses for comfort.

Lois is beside him, typing on her laptop, putting together everything they've found so far, ready for whatever they find in the city. She looks up when she feels him tense against her shoulder, just in time to see the sign as the bus passes.

Turn Back All, nailed to a half-dead tree, rusted red and falling apart.

"Just a little joke folks, the locals aren't fond of tourists so they like to scare 'em off if they can. Just means we're getting close." 

The rest of the bus is seemingly mollified by the bus driver's words, chattering about the fun local custom, but Clark's eyes are on the next sign, peeking out of the foliage on the other side of the bus.

Beware.

The bus goes silent.

Danger.

Leave This Place.

Warning: Death.

They just keep showing up, one after the other even as the sky gets darker with clouds and the rot in the air gets thicker. Some are clearly set up by the city, with neat lines and bright colors. Some are probably made by the citizens, big pieces of wood or metal covered in messy paint. A few are just paint on the trees, dripping like blood.

Go Away.

This Place is Not Safe.

Get Out.

"They might as well have said 'Abandon All Hope, Ye Who Enter Here,'" Lois mutters.

Clark snorts, but his eyes stay up. The bus is turning a corner, and a city is finally visible through the thick foliage.

It was tall, is Clark's first thought. There aren't any suburbs of short little houses for the bourgeoisie, no industrial outskirts, just crumbling brutalist architecture and gothic decor right from the entrance.

He can finally hear the city too. He doesn't know why he couldn't before, how it hid from Kryptonian ears, but it echoes in his ears now, gunshots and sirens and screams and whispers. He can't hear anything else on top of the noise, like the rest of the world no longer exists even to Superman's ears. He would have been afraid if his mind had room for it.

The bus is being swallowed, Clark was suddenly sure. The signs were the teeth of the great and terrible city he sees before him and soon they would pass through the maw and enter the place of no return. Soon they would be in the throat and it would convulse and throw them downward and then the city would digest them alive. Whatever was left would not be the same as what entered.

The bus stops at a rickety station just inside the city. The bus driver turns to them as the doors open and his smile is friendly but his eyes are distant and tired.

"Welcome to Gotham," he said. "The most cursed city in America."

"Good luck."

[sugar-petals]

✏︎ a full guide to ▹Taemin

› i decided to compile some material to check out and enjoy if you want to get into his work. or, for some nostalgia if you’re already a shawol 👋 

↳ INCLUDES:

basic info

iconic MVs

famous stages

hot af fancams

other important appearances

reaction cams

meme segment

a sweet bonus (spoiler: taemin has a cute cat)

□ start and browse wherever and however you like, and how much you like, there’s no wrong way to read this 👍

///

1. A VERY PRINCELY PROFILE FIRST 

- CLASSIC DATA

full name: Lee Francesco Tae Min (이 프란체스코 태민) — hanja: 泰 tai 民 min (meaning: “great people”), Francesco = baptismal name 

occupation: singer-songwriter, dancer, actor, cat dad

born in: seoul

age: 28 

d.o.b: 18th July 1993 — yes he’s a cancer 🦀 

education: music & film major

- CAREER 

trained since: 2005 (!)

groups: SHINee + SuperM 

SHINee position: main dancer, sub (now lead) vocalist, brat maknae SuperM position: main dancer, T-poser, main vocalist, center

debut: 2008 (SHINee) + 2014 (solo) + 2019 (SuperM). watch out, the man debuts every 5 years! now seriously: this is a historical record in kpop, taemin debuted in 3 generations. 

company: SM Ent 

fandom name (group activity): shawols ♥︎ — abbreviated from “SHINee world“

fandom name (solo activities): taemints — invented after he handed out mint sweets to noona fans: now ye know

solo albums: “ACE” (2014), “Press It” (2016), “Sayonara Hitori” (2016), “Flame of Love” (2017), “Move” (2017), “Never Gonna Dance Again: Act 1” (2020), “Advice” (2021).

- ADDITIONAL INFO

voice type: tenor // 3 octave+ range, specialty: mixed register

hobbies: dance, music & the piano 😍

languages: korean, japanese (advanced, can converse on japanese talk shows), english (currently learning)

bestie: exo’s kai

military: enlisted May 31, 2021 - discharge October 31, 2022 (was drafted into the army band, it’s so fitting)

ideal type: “I like someone who is consistent and true. I don’t like it when they hide their true selves and later reveal the true them.”

signature emoji: 6v6

insta: Im____ltm

2. iconic music videos

time and again, taemin’s ideas find their shape and sound as beyond-creative pieces. since he’s around since ‘05, the professionalism is superb. despite being active for so long, he’s still several camp lightyears ahead with what he’s putting out and stuns as always. taemin remains a paragon of self-improvement, dance, imagination, and novelty. since he plays the piano for 15 years now, the musicality really shows.

⚠️  heads up. taemin (being taemin) has made it a tradition and signature style of doing borderline R-rated concepts. he often releases in japan where more NSFW liberty is possible. hence, 18+ ahead.

move (2017) — a must-know internet breaker. the tantalizingly slow dance and glamorous images of taemin in the rain were all around the world. move is taemin’s most impactful contender. it’s so requested that he performed it everywhere, from seoul fashion week to comedy clubs. 

criminal (2020) — fancy a visual firework and guidebook of modern creepypasta? a glimpse into taemin’s mind reflecting themes of total surrender? he got you covered. the tied wrist dance and ‘destroy me more’ (’더 망쳐줘 - deo mangcheojweo’) tagline leading into a dramatic final chorus gathered serious infamity. 

famous (2019) — the most fabulous kpop song ever made, even the chorus says so. a sassy japanese release that indeed got famous for the notorious bondage scenes and the ‘shaky elbow’ dance. taemin singing to you how sexy he is while serving visuals deluxe to prove it = the best way to invest your time. the retro bass and drums in these, my god.

want (2019) — so catchy, so aesthetic. black snakes gliding all over taemin’s suit (tw, it’s not CGI) and him reiterating ‘hot, hot’ in the chorus: what more do you ‘want’ indeed? 80% of his songs are seductive, but this one knocks it out of the park with the lyrics and racy adlibs.

advice (2021) — a masterclass in head voice and taemin being a gnc legend. dropped before he enlisted. a tale on haters, gossip, and him taking his own advice. if you want to see taemin reprising his viral long hair, crop top fashion, a hip-shaking point dance, crashing his car and rebirthing covered in white fake blood, advice is your pick. the song & choreo is extra fast-paced and even includes rap bits. an extremely challening piece to perform.

danger (2014) — his solo debut and a game-changing, ultra-recognizable era. thank god he took the leap. from bottle blonde waves to piercings to sparkle suits. danger swept the masses, especially the stages took the kpop world by storm since he’s notoriously been stripping his jacket off.

flame of love (2017) — an acoustic guitar-heavy j-pop release that makes for a textbook romantic ballad with a sad twist of losing your lover. the video was much talked about for featuring a model and the visual effects. taemin combusts in furiously sparking flames and becomes a phoenix. simply amazing.

two kids (2020) — astonishing vocal display, hands down. another sad as hell bop with taemin roaming the streets and suburbs of paris. dancing his heart out, full of regrets and nostalgia. just an allround well-executed broken heart song. 

sayonara hitori (2016) — dance spectacle with stunning vocal belts. taemin in a satin gown dancing on a piano, in front of a giant moon, petals raining down, then he’s hanging with samurai in a scorching lava field, nothing left to wish for. breaching into the japanese market with a melancholic atmosphere and lots of animation again.

thirsty (2017) — um. the title says it all. you know what’s coming. taemin putting in the floor work in a red suit. here goes the fisheye lense effect, aand intense vocals. it’s the concert version of the dance so you’re getting a full choreo meal here.

press your number (2016) — another banger with a dramatic action plot, shoulder-revealing dance, and taemin being tied up (you never guessed). another day, another demolished car, we’re channeling road movie vibes here. tw for blood.

drip drop (2016) — just taemin sexily dancing in the scorching desert with black clothes on, actually a winter turtleneck, nothing special to see here at all. the choreography has caused hilarious memes. another performance-only video so you get every move right here. 

idea (2020) — another mesmerizing recent song sampling a ‘killing me softly’ tag and bringing on the angelic sweater fashion. idea’s rooftop choreography has been dubbed as almost impossible to cover. how he’s not breaking his every limb is one of k-pop’s biggest mysteries.

+ a personal japanese song favorite: tease (2019) — doesn’t have a music video, but it’s a perfect jam that sticks with you. don’t look up the lyrics unless you have holy water available. PS: holy water (2019) is also a taemin song, what a coincidence huh. at best, listen to them parallel to holy-fy his teasing. taemin stan life hack.

3. popular fancams

taemin being known for his unique dancing style, artistic vision, gorgeous outfits and jewels, arresting silhouette, eye contact, and the ever-popular T-pose, there’s a lot of dazzling live footage to behold. true story, chances are he ripped his pants in most of these because he dances so passionately.

move 190518 — the one that changed it all. you’ll get ‘move disease’ (as knetz called it) after watching this, too. the waist harness outfit with the glove and heavy makeup. the stage presence. the character. the beauty of him. that’s why you pay for the internet. 

jopping — taemin debuted the legendary meme artifact at capitol records. this fancam garnered praise for him discarding his defunct mic pack and dancing without hearing the music in-ear which is extremely hard to do. he also helped other members within light speed to correct their choreo positions. 1000% professional.

idea vertical fancam — taemin is basically gomez addams confirmed. amazing black skirt outfit and natural hair, and rhinestones on the face. a goth husband.

tiger inside focus — super m’s catboy athem. all in 4K. if you want taemin’s take on feline moves, head right here.

want — some red suit and signature glove goodness. his fluid dancing is hypnotic to no end. feathery light vocals, feathery light movements — but every step accurate, a winding body to behold. swoon material.

artistic groove stage — underappreciated taemin song. great blue blouse styling (it really is one of the best hues on him beside bright red and black), cat-like movement across the stage. watch his hands: the speed, it’s incredible.

sherlock in 2016— SHINee’s back! with the unmistakable choreo. reprising an oldie but goldie in another all-black outfit, fervently danced. taemin’s long hair from back then is very missed, we got it back for advice, but this stunner is also right up there with the best casual tuxedo styles. taemin’s famous legs in ripped jeans, prepare to be wowed.

view rehearsal — legendary banger. purple hair taemin with a cute corn tee, dancing impeccably and with such dynamism. how he moves every axis of his body is simply stellar.

odd eye focus — stunning concept. great intensity. taemin being such a captivating beau.

don’t call me focus — wanna see him pop off? shinee’s recent anthem is just perfect. expressive outfits. amazing footwork. PS: SHINee say don’t call me but klutz king taemin leaves his phone in the fridge by accident (no joke, this happened) so it’ll be difficult to call him in the first place lmao! 

lucifer in 2015 — give it up for SHINee again! a bop that never gets out of fashion, and taemin looks adorable as hell in his oversized sweater. even if you haven’t dabbled in SHINee, you gotta know lucifer.

4. groundbreaking stages

as every other taemin gif tumblr tag will tell you, his most frequent habit is getting possessed on stage. now really, the man’s work ethic is tireless. the resulting performance skill and splendor always turns heads. taemin’s appeal in four words: he draws you in. his soft yet soaring vocals — all sustained during choreographies as bonkers as that — are an absolute treat. enjoy one of the most unique voices and stage presences in the biz.

door at mama 2017 — oh my god. taking performance to a new level. here’s taemin perfecting the concept of becoming art with his body. one of his most-reblogged stages ever.

sexuality — outrageous. pure hard stan hype. watch at your own risk. taemin’s juiciest song is here to put you in a coma with a painfully tight suit, dripping sweat, and a pumping mega beat. the two (!) dance breaks are a new level of horny jail. thank god it doesn’t have a music video. taemin is proof that SM’s k-pop vision ain’t for kids. the track has blatant moans mixed into it. and the things his waist can do... bruh. to make it worse: thigh grab! 

move & danger @ dream concert — his sinning continues. if there’s rain in the move music video, why not on stage, too? water bomb festival is a joke compared to this. taemin in a tanktop, 1000% live singing his debut and smash hit, that’s making for the best pictures + experience ever. meanwhile, the fans in the first row are so cute in their rain coats 😆❤️

taemin medley at mama 2020 — beautiful. just beautiful. prince taemin has arrived. they even make him look like he descended from the ceiling with a gigantic cape. this dude saved my 2020. includes an intro, criminal, heaven, and idea. absolute top-notch.

taemin + kai: pretty boy stage — a much-anticipated collab of the best friends ever. lord knows how often they practiced dance over the years together. new takes on masculinity, composed by jonghyun. the impact was huge, kai and taemin are physical performance aces and overall concept vanguards whatever they lay their attention on so this is grade A 2016 kpop history in one video.

taemin + sunmi — a joint stage of criminal x gashina. oh yeah. it trended like nothing else before and enthralled unsuspecting bisexuals worldwide. that gun dance and taemin’s low-cut outfit: for the books. these two just own the retro horror genre and it’s a collab on eye level. the crowd’s eyes continuously pop from their sockets because there are so many plot twists. this is what happens when sunmi breaks out her fiercest choreos on a variety show and taemin is her witness: instantly reached out to work together, the deal was sealed. plot summary: sunmi shoots taemin for his sexiness. subscribed, liked, sold and notified.

want stages mix — the crowd was wild. the fanchants! a cut of all his performances and thereby also the fantastic suit outfits. such a visual.

criminal at KBS — as a heaven and hell juxtaposition. this stage is just amazingly pompous and so in character. taemin is winding on the floor and going through it so, very worth the watch. he’s on fire, man.

thirsty at m countdown — oh well. you know how it goes. a take from the comments: “I mean he could've just asked for a cup of water instead!”

taemin + boa: only one — two kpop giants who’ve been there since ages, so you can imagine the quality. whenever taemin pops up at mama, something good happens (this time, it’s soft skinship), and boa is the undeniable 1st gen queen who had taemin as her backup/co-dancer 7 years ago already! these two have the most terrific long-term dance careers ever so it’s perfect to see them share the stage.

famous live — ...come on. this absolutely needed a huge concert audience.

super m: no manners — a perfect example how taemin really uses the stage fully instead of just doing step sequences, portraying perfect emotions and posture. every bone in his body is putting in the work. years of training.

criminal live — clean, captivating, inventive. when taemin kneels, time stops. criminal is in another league. relatable comment quote: “I would just like to apologize to my past self for not listening to Taemin songs sooner.”

black rose — a rap collab with kid milli that just grows on you more and more. hot co-ed backup dancer alert. considered a classic, well-loved track among fans.

taemin + jimin: showdown — and you thought it can’t get any better? the two bffs teamed up to teach ‘em all how to dance and grind. a cultural reset and i wish twomin collabed again because the sheer artistic and athletic opportunities are boundless.

5. other memorable appearances

dingo music 100 challenge. taemin dishing up several point dances in 100 seconds perfectly. the heaps of praise in the comment section speak for themselves. if you want to see the living legend in action and all the best bits in one spot (if that’s even possible), watch this.

taemin at studio choom — we all love this format. treat yourself to a great recent performance of advice.

move dance practice — here comes the master of sensuality. highly acclaimed by experts, so many views, and he’s not even in full stage mode/fashion yet. taemin confidently owns androgyny the very best out there.

idea dance practice — here you get see his latest hardest choreo ever in action. taemin makes it look so easy... while it gets more and more and even more back-breaking. it’s a popular opinion that he’s considered the best dancer in kpop right up there with kai. PS: also watch it if you wanna see T-poses to wow you, never a bad idea (pun intended).

idea at dingo music — full glorious roof top dance with a crop top sweater to mesmerize you in 4K. all the moves clearly filmed.

criminal dance practice — the mv shows a lot of it, but here’s the extended wrist tie dance. oh my. taemin just aces fanservice.

criminal dance teaching with mark — nct/super m rap prodigy mark lee trying to pull off the tied wrists hilariously.

idols dancing to move — they’ve all done it.

taemin on Problematic Men — with the topic of visual riddles, puzzles, and math tasks. worry not, he got the numbers down. hot dance and hot brain content, we love to see it. he’s called the ace with good reason. TL;DR: here goes taemin making other guys look like has-beens as usual. 

6. starstruck reaction cams

everyone around him has a 99% chance to be a shawol, and taemin’s immediate impact up close is always the talk of the town. that’s he’s known for having equal parts fangirls and fanboys both in the fandom and industry itself is the cherry on top. everywhere he rolls up, people go DAMN out loud.

super m & fans react to the jopping mv premiere — the most nervous you’ll ever see a k-pop group. when baekhyun makes a serious face and even ten loses his cool, you know the stakes are high. taemin: upper right, platinum hair. this went down at capitol records: fans & the CEOs sat with the members. it was madness. taemin finally got to debut with his bestie and co-pro dancer kai (grey hair, next to him), and super m is SM’s first ever all star group with taemin having iconic parts. so this was in all regards a huge deal. i break into a sweat watching this every time. since all super m members are choreo monsters and reaction kings, you need 7 pairs of eyes. if you haven’t jopped today, do it now. 

bts reacts to sunmi and taemin’s stage — a 12 million views video including jungkook being extra shook and taehyung sensually dancing to MOVE. as mentioned, bts is well-acquainted with taemin, he’s best friends with jimin who is beaming his heart out in the video. glorious faces when suddenly, the whole song becomes unpredictable.

seoul fashion week performance reaction — who doesn’t wanna see taemin sweeping the catwalk while the fanboys hyperventilate in the first row. the crowd held back more to hear the music and it’s a fashion audience but jaws were really dropped that day.

exo reacts to move — another viral reaction cam, audio isn’t the best but the scene is legendary. look to the left where baekhyun and kai are grooving it up. vernon and jooheon are also reacting in such an animated way, look to the far right corner, love the enthusiasm, same.

minho reacts to advice — together with taemin who seriously evaluates himself, and they explain a little, it’s always enlightening to hear taemin’s thoughts and artistic ideas. he has regular input with the direction and choreo and knows exactly what he wants. since he’s a film major, he has great understanding of visual art.

extra: shinee reacts to bts’ perfect man — now the other way around, it’s taemin reacting! shinhwa are label co-mates to shinee, so this is multifandom gold. another staple that has to be included. we got ot5 shinee jamming out and documenting everything they see freely, taemin is bopping along, the vibe is immaculate.

7. extra meme segment

it’s no surprise that taemin is a walking meme since he went viral as ‘the kpop dude’ gif and has naughty maknae status. the inside jokes are endless, so this is the tip of the iceberg — your youtube algorithm will do the rest.

taemin recreating the apple kick scene from twilight on we got married: he’s called ‘magic hands’ so watch what happens.

shinee imitates his dancing.

his mortal enemy: bugs. 🐝(meanwhile, he can have snakes crawl all over his neck and stuff)

taemin, ten, and lucas twerking goes with everything.

expectation VS reality.

classic taememe reactions: the kpop dude.

taemin can’t stop talking about shinee <3

“please don’t cheat on me :(“ — taemin before enlistment. — don’t worry taemin, now this thread is out there.

english king.

famous misheard soy un dorito lyric, now available as a ringtone.

long haired taemin wildly flipping his extensions around cuz he can.

taemin, master of perfectly coordinated dance, but famous clumsy disaster.

super m crackhead compilation 5000.

kai & taemin set a barbecue on fire, subsequently make the news.

taemin on knowing bros cut. we all know... this show is pure chaos.

more magic hands taemin with shinee.

the man, summarized in two minutes.

legendary vintage cringe treasure: taemin on SNL as a “tsundere cafe” waiter 😂

taemin films a cheesy drama, super m loses it.

random talent compilation.

super m being shawols and fanboys for taemin.

comforting us: english compilation so we don’t feel sad about enlistment.

and: google shinee’s halloween costumes (!!) for the annual chaotic SM party which has met gala status at SM. they’ve always been killing it and it’s hilarious. taemin dressed up as howl and vampires, need i say more.

////

8. BONUS: i really don’t mean to drag you into that rabbit hole and finish you off entirely, but... taemin has an extremely adorable cat. 

yes. since early 2021. kkoongie, who he smooches 24/7. shawols were in shambles for weeks when the news dropped. these two have all kinds of anecdotes, e.g. kkoong likes to doze inside taemin’s piano lmao! a true connoisseur. she naps a lot in general, everyone’s all over it.

recently, taemin dropped the pick-up line of the century asking taemints about who wants to be kkoong’s co-parent. oh gee. who wouldn’t like being part of the lee family 😄

kkoong grew up well, and stays with kwonho while taemin’s in the army for now, there are regular updates. they also have loads of videos out there (and fan tweets + accs), i’m so sorry if you ever watch one because then you’ve fallen for them completely.

that being said: have fun browsing. taemin is a one in a million artist, i love introducing him to you ✊and if you already know him, i hope this thread can bridge his service a little. if you like, reblog so others can get to know his work as well. if there are any mistakes in here, or something else iconic that needs to be listed but i forgot, just shoot me a reply. 

[stockyardsyndrome]

I was gonna put this in the tags, but it was getting long, so fuck it, here we go. Just my semi-relevant rambling.

When people ask for languages that are easy to learn, a lot of the time they're looking for a language that is "simple". And yeah, that makes sense, because the idea that some languages are "more simple" (or "more ugly") than others is still such a widespread thing. But the only way that works is if language supremacy and bigotry (racism, ableism, etc) are also still a fundamental part of the public consciousness. So that's upsetting.

I'm about to finish undergrad with a major in linguistics, and the number of times these arguments have apparently had to play out in respected academic spheres is also legitimately distressing. Like, you come into a linguistics class and on day one they tell you: Rule #1: be descriptive, not prescriptive and Rule #2: every natural language is equally complex and valid and no language is better or worse than any other. Because keep in mind, historically people calling another language simpler or less complex than their own were trying to say that the people who spoke that language were less intelligent or civilized (though sometimes they went the opposite way and tried to portray another language as being unnecessarily complicated, but still with the same goal of proving their own language was superior).

So then you read the historical documents of (attempted) linguistics and find some racist nonsense and you think okay, glad we got rid of all that.

And then you read some more modern stuff and find out that no, it's all still here.

Here's a list of shockingly recent bad takes I've come across, from published experts and respected professionals (and some of my classmates), in no particular order (and please if someone who knows more could correct me on stuff I get wrong, that would be great because I'm not digging any of these documents back up just to make sure my nonsense Tumblr rant is 100% accurate)

1. "Creoles (languages that are usually a mix of a European colonizer's language and the languages of the locals or slaves they ruled over) are simpler than the languages they came from" No they really aren't

2. "Creoles are just a version of the lexifier language (usually the European language) than has been simplified enough that the speakers of the substrate languages (usually the non-European languages) can understand it" sir are you perhaps a time traveler from 17th century Europe

3. "Okay maybe creoles aren't simpler, but pidgins are" again, no, also I'm gonna need you to define "pidgin" in a way that doesn't assume unequal levels of complexity and also doesn't rely on "data" collected by slave traders

4. "Sign languages are less-" NO.

5. "-complex because they're just gestures-" who tf do you know that is able to have entire arguments about complex topics like philosophy or biology or whatever entirely through gesture

6. "-and are more basic and universal because they're mostly iconic"  if signs were actually mostly iconic, you would be able to understand sign languages without being taught. Also, being iconic doesn't mean it's not complex, and doesn't mean it's universal. See also: onomatopoeia

7. "That whole idea about all natural languages having equal complexity is just a truism" if that were the case, we wouldn't have to keep having this argument

8. "Equality of language isn't proven" well it sure as shit hasn't been disproven. We have tons of evidence for it, and the only evidence against it comes from racists and religious fanatics, which makes it about as well-proven as the theory of evolution at this point

9. "Certain phonemes are objectively too difficult for an entire population to waste time learning to produce" yes, and those are the phonemes that no language uses. If it's in a natural language, then it's not too hard to produce, it's just hard for you because you didn't learn it as a kid

10. "Certain languages (or aspects of them) are just objectively ugly" so are you, but apparently your mama didn't think you were ugly enough to eradicate. For real though, you might have a couple phonemes or rhythms you just personally find less attractive, but none of them are universal. The rest you've been culturally conditioned to dislike

11. "Information density is potentially a good measure of efficiency" information density is a good measure of information density. Hope this helps

12. "All languages are valid... Except French, hahaha!" *Heavy sigh*

Idk man. I just wish people would stop trying to be bigots about language, because I study language because it's beautiful and intricate (but yes also terrible and will kick you in the nuts) and I love them all.

Also, I would like to join the very-large-fish brigade. Minority languages are cool. Be nice to them. Learn them if you're lucky enough to get a chance.

Here’s how to tell if a language is easy to learn

None of them are easy

They’re all stupid and terrible and will kick you in the nuts

That being said

Languages similar to ones you already speak

Languages you have a lot of motivation to learn

Languages that have a lot of resources and media to watch and/or listen to and/or read

So, if you’re reading this with relative ease (aka you speak English fluently) probably French or Spanish

Do whatever you want though idk

Don’t just choose a language based on how easy it is

Unless that’s what it takes to keep you motivated idk

Go learn Frisian or something

[kim-poce]

6. Witches Are Meant To Burn: Break

On Patreon (two weeks earlier release)

First | Previous | Next | Masterlist

“They found another one,” Hector said as soon as he entered the tent. He laid one of the papers we were using to copy the library contents on relatively even rock we were using as a center table. “That’s eight completely unknown languages now.”

We expected it, at least on some level. That’s Fog Age for you. You think you know what you are seeing until you look again and find yourself wrong. It’s a tricky time period; centuries and centuries of nothing, each new information teaches us less, and our theories only work until some new thing proves it wrong.

One of the things that we know for sure that happened was that languages died, these which Hector mentioned for exemple, we really expected it, the Hands of Fate cave also had a couple of sentences in unknown languages. I can’t stress enough how little we know about this time period. I wonder if the witches were well known back then, whatever they are. I wonder if everyone back then could tell me what it means. My colleagues seem to think I’m too focused on this one word instead of the several ‘cooler’ stuff I could be studying. Yes, cultures were erased, and it was almost everywhere in the world. Even Portia, this small country formed mostly by several indigenous tribes that were back then (as far as we know) isolated from whatever in the hell was happening in the world has no data about the period known as Fog Age. Yes, just in the last couple of weeks we found eight new languages with several unknown words that will be amazing to work on.

What they don’t seem to understand is that my obsession isn’t just because witches are unknown, but even without the burning feeling they cause there is something pretty about this word; it survived.

It is used daily, even if no one knows what this means, it isn’t a dead language, it survived the Fog Age, it went through. Witches burnt, maybe, but they didn’t die, not completely. Tell me if that’s not interesting. Maybe it isn’t and I’m just an obsessed nerd, but, well, we all are here.

Still, the Podium (agh!) Library was way over any expectation we had, our ‘at some level’ feel too short of the real thing. I would live here if I could.

“The alphabet?” I asked, glancing down at the paper. It was a copied sample of the words, I couldn’t, obviously, make sense of any of them.

“Yes,” Hector nodded, knowing what I wanted to ask. “Mostly straight lines, I can’t be sure yet but it was most probably used in a place where they carved words instead of painting them.”

“And about the alphabet we do know?”

“No changes. The same three, four if you count the entrance sentence.”

I nodded. The three languages he spoke of were not from here, they were old versions of three different languages in three different continents, away from here. Four continents if you count the Kiona dialect in the entrance. This place doesn’t fit in any historical setting it was supposed to. I can’t even begin to list how this doesn’t fit in anything at all.

I folded the paper and put it inside my notebook. “Pack you things, we are going back to Jitarin. Ah ah wait–” I raised my hand as they were about to protest “–it’s a three day mandatory break. We are working twelve hours a day for almost two weeks straight, we need to clear our mind if we want it to keep working.”

“That’s funny coming from you,” Hector said before he could think about it. He cleaned his throat before speaking again. “I meant to say that I’m happy you are taking time off!”

“You are taking time off, all of you. I’ll interview some new faces, the workload is too much for the current group. I’ll also have to go with Maliane’s team to check the structure again as soon as I get back so we can see if it’s possible to increase the amount of academics per shift.”

“Why am I not surprised?” Tina sighed then her mouth broke into a smirk, “You got the short stick again, don’t you?”

“Ah shut up, I swear they are playing me on this.” I protested.

“Maybe you are just unlucky,” June said with a shrug. “Well, I think we need a couple days to look over some things in Jitarin’s archive and-”

“Rest-” I cut. “We are looking at letters we don’t recognize for far too long, there are shelves and shelves yet to be documented. We are barely three-quarter into the first step of this project. Forget looking things up, clear you mind so you can actually work later. If I find any of you still working on the project I’ll cut you off. Am I clear?”

The five of them murmured agreements.

“Also I, as a member of the council, talked with Jitarin’s principal, and she allowed that idea to pass.”

“So you can mail books from the academy archive from here now?” Sandra asked.

“Not now, just after the mandatory break. You can send your order along with the rest of the resource order. No need to pay, a limit of ten books per person and the deadline is three weeks. Officially.”

“And infinitely with a workaround!” June said.

“Now pack your things, the carriage will arrive soon and I want to sleep in the train, not in an inn.”

I was tired by the time I arrived at my house. Yes, I mean my house and not my room in Jitarin, it has been quite a while since I was home. I own a two-story house in the Haven district. It's a safe localization although many people don't like the lack of close-by stores. I’m not home enough to mind.

It is completely made with bricks, I have been in a burning wooden house and I’m not repeating that experience. The place is cute, I guess, the walls are between brown and beige, with the typical rose pattern drawn on it. My room is a lot more cluttered than the rest of the house, but I live alone so who cares? The only room that I make sure is always neat is the closet. I can’t go around wearing ugly and wrinkled clothes, that’s the one line I draw.

I was happy I was back. The climate here was so much cooler and I felt like I could really breathe now. And I was tired, I was truly tired, I didn’t even take off my overcoat before passing out on my bed.

In my dreams several words in unknown languages flew around, shining and filling piles and piles of paper. I woke up feeling like I had worked the whole night. Yeah… we truly needed a break, I would increase it to one week if Gione Petar, that bastard, wouldn’t steal my work by the time I went back.

The dream wasn’t all that bad though, I dreamed with witches, not the real ones, I would need to know what they were to dream with them, I dreamt about the warmth that comes from the words. Not from the ones I write down, nor the carving in the Hands of Fate cave. It was the warmth that I feel when I touch it in stories, it feels comfortable somehow. The dream was tiring but comfortable, I guess.

I had a few hours before the interview for the new students started, I thought about taking out the paper I put in my notebook and trying to read it. I didn’t do it, though. I was in a half-break, I needed to at least pretend I wasn’t a workaholic. Looking back, I should've tried to read that, maybe the workaholic me was right all along. Not that this matters now. It also didn’t matter then, taking a warm bath was so much more important.

—

@kathea, @extemporary-username, @wolfeyedwitch, @blu-jay-2779, @rose-pinkie, @latenightcupsofcoffee

[itsgerges]

Best Greetings

What's The Nature Of The Sun?

I claim– The Sun Rays Is Created By The Planets Motions Energies Total

The sun is Not doing nuclear fusion to produce its rays – instead- the planets motions energies total be used as the source of the sun rays.

 Can This Theory Be A Fact?

 I use the planets data – means- the analysis of the planets data lead to this result  

Here we have 3 problems

 (First problem)

How Is The Planet Data Created? the physics book answers (by random process, initial conditions and historical unknown factors)  

Shortly,

No geometrical reason be found behind the planet data definition- also- No design by which the solar system be created or moving – no map for the distances –

Nothing at all

 We have 9 separated rocks flying in the space and by the sun gravity they revolve around the sun- this is the solar system vision by the book description

 I through a rock into the stagnant water

The planets data is defined by exact equations and can be concluded theoretically

Means- planet diameter, mass, orbital distance, period, velocity …..etc and all data be defined based on exact equations

I have five equations by which the planets data can be concluded theoretically – the book is wrong (the data is defined based on exact equations)

 (Second problem)

Can Particle Own Data Be Changed By Relative Motion?

Lorentz transformation is the poof for this fact – but – the books fight against it

 I don't know how to find the fact –

The particle length is contracted, its mass is increased and its time is dilated as a result for high velocity motion and the empirical proves prove this fact and the books tell these empirical proves are illusion of measurements  

 How can the books know that?

When in physics the empirical proves be disproved by theoretical ideas?

 Suppose I entered a lab and found the machine and not found any one else – what are the results I will have by that? the machine will show the contraction of length, increasing of mass and dilation of time – but – the physicist isn't found to tell us his secret that the empirical proves are illusions of measurement!

 Do you see this situation – I will leave this lab while I believe Lorentz transformation measure facts while it measure illusions (according to the physicist belief)

Someone puts a signboard on the lab door with a question

(why is the physics the science of measurements? How does need empirical proves?)

(Third problem)

When I want to buy one sandwich for lunch– someone told me, you need a back loan!

 I do a simple Job- because – I arrange the planets data and this arrangement shows clearly that the sun data depends directly on the planets data and the sun is created by measurements of the planets data –

Simply I concluded the sun is created based on the planets motions energies

 But- the fighting is around –If A Light Beam Can Be Produced By A Relative Motion

 Here – what proof can I write?

I have the planets data which I can arrange and prove that the sun CAN'T be created far from the planets –on the contrary- the sun all data depends directly on the planets data-now the question is (Can The Data Prove This Fact?)

 The physicist mind is filled by the idea (NO light beam can be created by a relative motion) –So whatsoever data I provide -  nothing works

 By the way

In one discussion they wrote this intelligent idea (Lorentz transformation is wrong because light velocity is a general velocity but particle velocity is a local one and the local can't be used in the same equation with the general)  

 Some intelligent person had written this splendid idea- and simply – kicked of all empirical proves by Lorentz experiments and all theoretical basics for the relativity theory and even Michelson and Morrely experiment results  

 A sentence killed the works of people for years – and removed hundreds of empirical proves – I don't know if there's any chairman for the physics company to whom we may ask about these wonders around.

 Notice

I want to write the planets data which proves clearly the sun is created by the planets motions –

But – when I write them- the youth of big bang theory will remove all data under the idea (the data is created by random process, initial conditions and historical unknown factors) –I put my five equations to prove that the planets data is created based on exact equations and can be concluded theoretically – but – the big bang youth are disappeared now and will be appeared in another place saying their lies    

 Shortly- I will put one data as example

I hope someone will see the beauty of geometry

 Example

4900 million km = 1.392 million km x 3475 km = 10921 km x 449197 km = 12756 km x 384000 km = 12104 km x 406000 km = 2 x 6792 x 363000

Where

4900 million km = Jupiter orbital circumference  

1.392 million km = The Sun Diameter

3475 km = the Earth moon diameter

10921 km = the Earth moon Circumference

449197 km = Jupiter Circumference

12756 km = Earth Diameter

12104 km = Venus Diameter

6792 km = Mars Diameter

406000 km= The Moon Orbital Apogee Radius

384000 km= The Moon Orbital Distance

363000 km= The Moon Orbital Perigee Radius

 Simply the data shows one design is behind all of them and the sun diameter is one player in this design – the solar system in one building created based on one design and the sun is a part geometrically in this building

This result can't be produced by the sun gravity – because the sun own data depends on  the planets own data – NOT means – the planets data is created depending on the sun- on the contrary – the sun data is created Clearly depend on the planets data  

 If we accept particle own data be changed by high velocity motion –  my hypothesis may explain how the sun rays be created by the planets motions energies

 MY HYPOTHESIS

The hypothesis – tells –

The creature brain causes the creature to see any velocity =300000 km/s as (Matter) and any velocity = Zero as (light beam)

By that

I make the light and matter 2 faces for the one coin – and the vision depends on the relative motion-

By that the velocity (300000 km/s) is a limit velocity for the creature ability – means- the creature can't realize any higher velocity even if found –

The limit here isn't limit for the universe but the creature abilities – because any velocity (300000 km/s) or higher will be seen as matter by the creature.

 Notice

That tells the matter data can be changed by motion with a velocity 300000 km/s and that explains Lorentz transformation where the particle own data is changed under motion by speed of light (300000 km/s)

  Thanks a lot for your kind interest and help

Speed Of Light Has An Effect On Matter Creation Process

https://www.academia.edu/s/053a0a794e

or

https://www.academia.edu/98508585/Speed_Of_Light_Has_An_Effect_On_Matter_Creation_Process

or

https://app.box.com/s/tpl1shsi2m28dqo6rq6x6j7ncid0zl4g

or

https://app.box.com/s/x52am353v74fwieeodg4a73yv9c31l2r

Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292

Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty  

Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow   (2010-2013)

Curriculum Vitae             https://www.academia.edu/s/b88b0ecb7c

E-mail                            mrwaheid@gmail.com, mrwaheid1@yahoo.com

                                     gergesgerges@yandex.ru                    

ORCID                           https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147

Facebook                       https://www.facebook.com/gergis.tawadrous

VK                                 https://vk.com/id696655587

Tumblr                           https://www.tumblr.com/blog/itsgerges  

Researcherid                   https://publons.com/researcher/3510834/gerges-tawadrous/

Google                                https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=2Y4ZdTUAAAAJ&hl=en

Livejournal                      https://gerges2022.livejournal.com/profile

Pocket                                                                     https://getpocket.com/@646g8dZ0p3aX5Ad1bsTr4d9THjA5p6a5b2fX99zd54g221E4bs76eBdtf6aJw5d0?src=navbar

PUBLICATIONS

box                                 https://app.box.com/s/47fwd0gshir636xt0i3wpso8lvvl8vnv

Academia                        https://rudn.academia.edu/GergesTawadrous

List of publications          http://vixra.org/author/gerges_francis_tawdrous

Slideshare                             https://www.slideshare.net/Gergesfrancis

[shatar-aethelwynn]

Well, the truth is that archaeologists, physicists, biological anthropologists and anthropologists have debunked as Biblically inspired pseudoscience the publication about the alleged destruction of Tall el-Hammam by some kind of "cosmic airbust" that you have invoked. And of course the identification of this site with the Biblical Sodom is totally arbitrary. See for more details https://www.sapiens.org/archaeology/tall-el-hammam/ (When Biblically Inspired Pseudoscience and Clickbait Cause Looting, written by a team of archaeologists working in this area).

Interesting. I’ve read the article you linked and I am not impressed. Half of it is more about criticizing the site lead’s religious beliefs than anything else. It has a clearly pointed agenda: to reveal that there is a clear agenda. How…unoriginal. The authors raise legitimate concerns, however I find their method of doing so is as sensational and biased as they accuse everyone else of being.

If we are to throw out a large amount of research from an archaeological site for no proven reason (and I say proven because at least one of the complaints is an “appears to be” and another is “they mention Sodom too many times”) other than that the people funding it aren’t atheists, and say it’s pseudoscience then I’m sorry, but we’re going to be throwing out a lot of other research as well. Because it is an unfortunate fact of life that you will need to deal with that some people can do science and archaeology and draw sound conclusions without being atheists. And some digs will be funded by people who have religious motivations. They will often be disappointed, but the alternative is no dig. That the research gets pounced upon to “prove” the ideas of less historically minded people does not make the work itself pseudoscience. It’s all pseudoscience if the person using it manipulated the quotes they use well enough.

That there is pushback on the paper does not in any way surprise me. Congratulations, you have demonstrated how science in academia works. Should I be impressed? Next there will be a paper refuting the rebuttals. Followed by a paper calling the refutations into question. Both sides will claim the other has an agenda. As is normal for science. I will simply be sitting here going “cool! More interesting research! Love when that happens! Unfortunate that I can't math!” because I don’t feel any obligation to say “This is actually Sodom”. Or did you not notice that I pointed out that there are now two sites people are pointing to. I wouldn’t be at all surprised if in another 10 years someone else comes along and says, “well actually, they’re both wrong it’s this new site.” My entire opinion on both sites is “People lived there! Wonder what they were like. What did they wear? What did they eat? I wonder what animals they liked.” If eventually indisputable proof that one of them is Sodom is found, great. If eventually indisputable proof is found that neither of them is Sodom, also great. Because either way, careful research has been done, and the Bible will remain what it has been: a collection of historical texts, with all the caveats and problems inherent in such.

Also, even if the air burst theory is satisfactorily disproven there are still questions that must be answered, which your article did not attempt to discuss: how did the people die? What happened to this site? Not an air burst? Disappointing because who doesn't love a giant explosion, but it's fine. So what’s the new theory?

“Instead, ancient peoples of the region likely developed oral histories and stories to explain these “ghost towns” located by the Dead Sea. Those stories then formed the basis for oral traditions that were eventually written down, more than a millennium later, in the Bible.” Congratulations, this is in fact how many people working on archaeological sites in the Levant, and many people learning about these two sites in particular, interpret this data. It is, in fact, fairly close to how I am currently inclined to interpret it, because I do not believe in biblical inerrancy.

“As anthropological archaeologists and critical thinkers, especially about heritage resources, we aren’t interested in equating real sites with mythical biblical cities.” I wonder where they would have fallen on the scale of opinions when the existence of Troy as anything other than a mythical city was an actual question. They are 100% correct that applying names of not-proven-real places to archaeological sites is dangerous and should be avoided. But to demand that no connection be made solely because the connection is to the Bible stinks of as deep a bias as they are accusing Collins (with no small justification, I admit) of. The authors all appear to worthy of respect on academic grounds, and I agree with their concerns over proper method, but not with how they word them.

“Illegally procured artifacts are marketed explicitly to people seeking a tangible connection with the Bible.” True. It’s an ongoing issue. Christians are absolutely a problem with this. It’s also a bit of a tangent from the main topic meant to make people angry and ignore that this is not actually a refutation of the site work. Looting would happen simply because it is an archaeological site. As evidenced by just about every archaeological site everywhere. Why do you think the archaeologists don’t announce their find immediately? It is an especially difficult and ongoing struggle with archaeological sites in the region simply because of where the site is located. The hypothetical connection with Sodom isn’t going to make that any different.

Finally, thank you for bringing this to my attention. I will try to keep an eye out for further research on a new hypothesis of what happened at the site. And if you find one feel free to pass it along. But articles complaining that people with a theological bias shouldn’t be allowed to work on, talk about or make hypotheses about their sites because “bible, eww” is not going to do much more than make me roll my eyes.