#prove me wrong with historical data | Explore Tumblr posts and blogs

itsgerges · 1 year ago

Text

Best Greetings

Can Light Velocity Have Effect On The Planets Data?

The Next Data Proves The Light Velocity Defines The Planet Data – The Discussion Provides 5 Proves For This Fact And A Preface For The Theoretical Idea Explanation

1 Preface

2 Light Defines Each Planet Orbit

3 Light Defines Each Planet Rotation Period

4 Light Defines Each Planet Orbital Period

5 Light Defines The Solar System Basic Design

6 The Energy Distribution Through The Solar System

1 PREFACE

What's the main idea behind The Solar System Origin Theory?

The theory tells – The Solar System Is One Light Beam -

This is the idea which the theory tries to prove by all means –

It tells – the planets matters and their distances are produced by light beam energy- the planets move by this light beam motion – it's one light beam behind all things in the solar system – the sky, the Earth, the sea water, the creatures, the trees and the space all of them are produced by one light beam energy and motion

This is the theory main idea

How Can I Prove This Theory?

The theory proof is a simple one because all planets data be defined by light motion – by that – the proof is a simple and direct

But

The light uses different geometrical rules and the light motion is more intelligent than me and for that I can't arrange all data in its correct positions to prove that (all data) be created by light motion – I can prove some of them only – but not all data

Where the theory tells a strange idea – and not all data definition be proved by light motion– the answer (pure coincidence of numbers) will be told and remove my theory

The solid fact is that – The Solar System Is One Light Beam-

In this point I put the data which proves light motion created the planets data

I put only four tables to prove this fact (in four points of discussion) – but – I still have thousands of data which can't be arranged under any table -

Let's provide some of them in this preface to prove this fact – actually – not only to prove this fact – but to show the beauty of light motion around the planets – and to refer to the beauty of geometry which be used behind -

And then someone will make a favor for the science and remove from the physics book the false idea tells (Planet Data Be Created Based On Random Process, Initial Condition And Unknown Historical Factors)– Someone should shout loudly telling that – this is a false idea – a wrong concept – a bad mind - the data be created by light motion based on geometrical rules and exact equations – means- Planet diameter, mass, orbital distance, period, velocity, inclination, rotation period and axial tilt be created based on Exact Equations (by light motion effect)

Data Group No. (1)

51118 seconds x 0.3 mkm/s = 15335 and 15335 seconds x 1.16 mkm/s = 18048 mkm

And

51118 seconds x 1.16 mkm/s = 59300 mkm

And

51118 seconds x (1.16/0.3) = 197393

Where

51118 km = Uranus diameter

30589 days = 2 x 15335 days = 30589 days = Uranus Orbital Period

18048 million km = Uranus Orbital Circumference

59800 days = Neptune orbital period (with 59300 the error 1%)

197393 days = The Planets Orbital Periods Total

The data uses 2 light beam velocities – the known light velocity (300000 km/s) and the original light beam velocity (1.16 million km per second)

And

By light motion, based on Uranus diameter (51118 km), the data be produced are: (Uranus orbital period, Uranus orbital circumference, Neptune orbital period and the planets orbital periods total)

The light uses planet diameter as a period of time and uses the time and distance exchangeable

My theory tells (the solar system is one light beam) and my proof is the provided data – Can This Proof Be Acceptable? - the answer (pure coincidence of numbers) be told usually – let's see the next group

Data Group No. (2)

103944 seconds x 0.3 mkm/s = 42895 mkm

42895 seconds x 1.16 mkm/s = 49528 mkm

42895 seconds x 0.3 mkm/s = 12756 mkm

Where

103944 hours = Jupiter Orbital Period

49528 km = Neptune Diameter

12756 km = Earth Diameter

Also – The value 42895 is Uranus number because – Uranus orbital period =30589 solar days and Uranus rotation period =17.2 hours and for that Uranus orbital period has 42895 Uranus rotation periods – in fact – my fourth equation defines Uranus diameter as a function in this value (42895) – all planets diameters be defined by this same equation – I try to show we can't escape from Uranus diameter even in another form.

Data Group No. (3)

Light (300000 km/s) moves during 165000 seconds a distance = 49528 million km where 49528 km = Neptune diameter and 160600 km = Uranus Circumference

(the error with 165000 is 2.5%)

we move through the same data by different sides – how can the data be connected as this?!

Data Group No. (4)

49528 seconds x (0.3)2 = 4495 million km

Where

49528 km = Neptune diameter and

4495 million km = Neptune Orbital Circumference

Understandable that (0.3) is light velocity (0.3 mkm/s)

That tells – Neptune uses its diameter to define its orbital distance by light velocity (300000 km/s) but Uranus uses its diameter to define its orbital circumference by using 2 light velocities (300000 km/s and 1.16 mkm/s)

We simply reach to the same planets different data by different using of light motion

Logically this is not pure coincidence instead its different geometrical rules be used by light motion – the data proves the idea strongly

Data Group No. (5)

17.2 h x 3600 s x 0.3 mkm/s = 18576 million km = (37100 million km /2)

This data is interesting – because – Uranus rotation period (=17.2 hours)

Light (300000 km/s) during 17.2 hours moves a distance = 18576 mkm- this distance equals accurately (half Pluto Orbital Circumference 37100 mkm) and also Uranus Orbital Circumference be 18048 mkm and has error with this distance (3%)

Data Group No. (6)

28244 seconds x (1.16)2 = 37100

28244 mkm = Neptune Orbital Circumference

37100 mkm = Pluto Orbital Circumference

This data can explain why we move in a circle of data – where – any data of the three planets (Pluto- Neptune and Uranus) leads to other data of the same three planets by light motion - this circle of data be done because light motion has a reflection between these planets

I prove the reflection of energy in the paper discussion- but I want to say – how the energy can be reflected if the space has no mechanical features? And how the energy can be reflected if no light beam moves behind – the reflection of energy be proved by thousands of data and if we remove the reflection of energy how to explain this data

Notice

Pluto moves during a solar day a distance =406000 km and

Uranus moves during 59800 seconds a distance =406000 km

Where

59800 days = Neptune orbital period and

(1.16)2 x (0.3) = 0.406 million km

In the next points I provide 4 tables prove that planets data be created by light motion- the tables depend on geometrical rules and mathematical system and by that the data can be understood clearly and light motion effect be proved strongly

I want to say

The light beam energy is the creator of every thing in the solar system and around us but why the universe is so rich if (one stuff) only be behind? the light uses different geometrical rules – the geometry book be written on the creatures and things be created by light motion effect, by that the useful result of the theory isn't only to know that the solar system is one light beam but more important to discover the used geometrical rules by light motion in its creation for the matters and space and how these geometrical rules cause the massive richness of the universe – the universe treasure is the geometry book written by light motion-

2 LIGHT DEFINES EACH PLANET ORBIT

Light motion defines each planet orbit – the following table proves this fact

We use the rate (1.88 = 2π x 0.3) where (0.3 = light velocity 0.3 million km/s)

Light motion creates each planet orbit depends on its previous neighbor

Let's provide the data and its analysis

Data

Mercury orbital circumference = 360 million

Venus orbital circumference = 360 million x 1.88 = 680 million km

Earth orbital circumference = 680 million x 1.88 = 1280 million km

Jupiter orbital circumference = 1280 million x 1.88 x 2 = 4820 million km

Saturn orbital circumference = 4820 million x 1.88 = 9040 million km

Uranus orbital circumference = 9040 million x 1.88 = 17010 million km

Neptune orbital circumference = 17010 million x 1.88 = 32200 million km

Pluto orbital circumference =??

Data Analysis

The produced values have average errors

Venus real orbital circumference = 680 million km (no error)

Jupiter real orbital circumference = 4900 million km (error 2%)

Saturn real orbital circumference = 9010 million km (error less 1%)

Uranus real orbital circumference = 18048 million km (error 5 %)

And

There are four planets out of the rule which are (the Earth- Mars – Neptune and Pluto)

Why?

(1)

Mars original orbit was between Mercury and Venus

Mars had migrated from its original orbit and for that Mars isn't shown in the design

As a result the next planet after the Earth is Jupiter and not Mars

Now we have three planets out of the rule!!

(2)

The rate (1.88) is a short rate to explains the light motion from orbit to another �� but – the light real motion depends on its original velocity 1.16 million km /s

Notice

I suppose the original light beam velocity is 1.16 million km per second and the light consumed its energy in the space creation and for that the velocity be decreased to the known one (300000 km/s) as a result – these 2 velocities refer to the same one light beam – before the space creation it be 1.16 million km per second and after the space creation it be 300000 km/s

Let's study Venus orbit through the real motion

Venus Orbit Analysis

Mercury orbital circumference =360 million km = 310 seconds x 1.16 mkm/s

And

Light (300000 km/s) travels during this period 310 sec a distance = 93 million km

And

93 million km x 2π = 586 million km

This number is used as a period of time (586 seconds) by light motion with its original velocity (1.16 million km per second) to pass the next planet orbital circumference

586 seconds x 1.16 million km /s = 680 million km (Venus orbital circumference)

These are the details behind each planet data which we analyze

I summarized the details into the rate (1.88) which shows light motion effect on the planets orbits definition but without details –

I did that because – I want to show – the light motion moves from each planet orbit to another – because that creates one chain and one series for the solar system – means- the data shows it's One Motion which created all planets orbits and caused each orbit to depend on its previous neighbor orbit – this result I can prove simply by my first equation which defines each planet orbital distance depend on its previous neighbor orbital distance and by this equation if we know Mercury orbital distance = 57.9 million km we can conclude all planets orbital distances theoretically without observation– my first equation does that simply and sufficiently –but here –I try to show – this rule is created by light motion – It's The Light Motion Which Caused Each Planet Orbit To Depend On Its Previous Neighbor Orbit –for that reason I put the data under the rate (1.88) in a summarized form –

Now -the data details gives good answers for the questions – let's do that in following

(3)

The three planets (the Earth – Neptune and Pluto) don't follow this rule why?

The Earth Value is 1280 = (1.16)2 x 952

(Earth orbital circumference =940 million km – with 952 mkm - the error be 1.3%)

Means –

The problem is that– the light velocity 1.16 mkm/s be used 2 times (additionally) on the rule – why??

Because of the moon motion effect on the Earth motion data - and also because of the reflection of energy – the moon effect is proved by one more proof I provide later in this discussion -

let's see the rest two planets data

(4)

Neptune value is 32200

This is a important value–we analyze it in point (No.I-5) –

for our discussion – this distance defines both orbits

32200 million km = 1.16 mkm/s x 28244 seconds And

37100 million km = 1.16 mkm/s x 32200 seconds

Means

Light (1.16 million km/s) travels during (28244 seconds) a distance =32200 million km and

Light (1.16 million km/s) travels during (32200 seconds) a distance =37100 million km

Where

28244 million km = Neptune Orbital Circumference

37100 million km = Pluto Orbital Circumference

Light uses the distances and periods of time exchangeable usually in all data

Shortly

Neptune and Pluto orbits be created (interacted and reflected) on one another – both of them depend on the value 32200 by light motion (on different two sides)

For one of them light uses a period (32200 s) and for the other light passes a distance (32200 mkm) – one orbit of them is reflected on the other –

The analysis of the distance (32200 mkm) will prove this idea clearly (point no.I-5)

The reflection of energy caused the two orbits to depend on the same value (32200) by two sides – by that- the data proves the rule and doesn't disprove it

In my first equation – Neptune and Pluto orbital distances depend on Uranus orbital distance that because the value (32200 = 2 x 16100 and 16100 x 1.16 = 18700 mkm where Uranus orbital circumference 18048 mkm – error 3.5% - this error is seen in Neptune orbital distance and not in Pluto)

Notice

I try to understand how the data works – the using of the double value (1.16)2 or (0.3)2 is done almost as a result of the energy reflection (Light reflection) – this conclusion can be somehow correct but there's a fact can disprove it because the light moves along the solar system for that we can find powers more that means we can find (1.16)N or (0.3)N

The reflection of energy in the solar system is only three times – and I can't define How this power (N) can be produced – the next data can help

778.6 mkm (Jupiter orbital distance) = 671 seconds x 1.16 mkm/s

(where 671 mkm = Jupiter Venus distance)

721 mkm (Jupiter Mercury distance) = 629 seconds x 1.16 mkm/s

(where 629 mkm = Jupiter Earth distance)

629 mkm (Jupiter Earth distance) = 551 seconds x 1.16 mkm/s

(where 551 mkm = Jupiter Mars distance)

5906 mkm (Pluto orbital distance) = 5127 seconds x 1.16 mkm/s

(where 5127 mkm = Jupiter Pluto distance) (Max error 1.5%)

This data tries to show – light motion build each part of the solar system distances -here we deal with one machine (1.16) builds the whole system but in its building the rules may be violated because of the planets creation data – the machine is accurate but as a creature body – the rules can be violated and the body still can be in life –

(5)

The data details still has more useful results–because –each planet defines its previous cycle period

Let's see that in following…

Venus Orbit Analysis (More Analysis)

Mercury orbital circumference =360 million km = 310 seconds x 1.16 mkm/s

And

Light (300000 km/s) travels during this period 310 sec a distance = 93 million km

And - 93 million km x 2π = 586 million km

1.16 million km/ s x 586 seconds = 680 million km (Venus orbital circumference)

Then

Light (300000 km/s) travels during this period 586 sec a distance = 175.9 million km

Earth Orbital Circumference =940 Million Km

Light (1.16 mkm/s) travels during the period 810 sec a distance = 940 million km

And

Light (300000 mkm/s) travels during the period 810 sec a distance = 243 million km

Mars Orbital Circumference =1433 Million Km

Light (1.16 mkm/s) travels during the period 1235 sec a distance = 1433 million km

And

Light (300000 mkm/s) travels during the period 1235 sec a distance = 370 million km

The values 175.9 days = Mercury day period, and 243 days = Venus rotation period and 365.25 days = Earth orbital period – each planet orbit defines its previous neighbor cycle period of time by light motion -

Also

The Earth produced value (1280 mkm) be passed by light (1.16 mkm/s) in (1105 seconds) and the light (300000 km/s) passes during 1105 seconds a distance = 327.6 mkm (error 1%) (where 327.6 days = the moon sidereal year)

That shows the Earth value (1280) be produced by effect of the moon motion on the Earth data because this value produces the moon sidereal year- also – that connects strongly Jupiter with the Earth moon because the Earth Value be used for the next planet which is Jupiter (not Mars)–and that makes Jupiter depends on the Earth moon.

But

After Mars no more cycle period be defined –

Means – the outer planets data don't produce cycle periods as the inner – I can't attribute that for Mars migration – something more strong caused this result – let's summarize this reason in following…

As it be discussed in the paper introduction- the data shows the energy is reflected from Pluto to Venus and then from Venus to Mars – by that – what was ( a distance) for Pluto be ( a period of time) for Venus and then again be (a distance) for Mars -

by that – the data in the inner planets be in ordinary order but the data in the outer planets be in reflected order – for that reason – the inner planets (in their original order) were (Mercury – Mars – Venus – Earth) this planets order shows order in diameters, masses and orbital distances by which each greater diameter necessitates greater orbital distance- this order is reflected in the outer planets –where – greater diameter necessitates shorter orbital distance in order (Jupiter – Saturn – Uranus – Neptune – Pluto) – this reflection of order be done because of the reflection of the energy and by that the data be reflected on one another- the reflection of the energy is almost the reason which removed the cycle periods definition by light motion for the outer planets.

Notice

Planet diameter is defined based on its orbital period – as example –

120536 seconds x (0.3)2 = 10747

Where

120536 km = Saturn diameter and 10747 days = Saturn orbital period

(we discuss all planets diameters in point no. I-4)

The data tells–

While light motion defines each planet cycle period – as we have seen in the 4 inner planets (Mercury- Venus –Earth – the Moon) – light motion defines also these planets diameters based on the cycles periods – so it's s pity the cycle period definition be stopped after Mars because the rest planets diameters can't be defined – but – spite of that – there are 2 additional planets diameters can be defined even without the cycles periods which are:

Mars

The value be produced by the Earth data is (1280) and this value is multiplied by (2) to produce Jupiter orbital circumference –

1280 x 1.88 x 2 = 4820 mkm – let's see the details in following…

Jupiter orbital circumference =4900 million km = 4224 seconds x 1.16 mkm/s

And

Light (300000 km/s) travels during this period 4224 sec a distance = 1267 million km

And - 1267 million km = 2 x 633 million km

If we use the Earth value (4820 mkm) in place of the orbit (4900 mkm) the distance 633 mkm will be only 611 mkm

6792 seconds x (0.3)2 = 611 mkm

Where

6792 km = Mars diameter

The data shows– Mars diameter still can be defined even without the cycle where Mars orbital period be 687 days and with (611 days) has an error equal (12%)

Neptune

Neptune orbital circumference = 17010 million x 1.88 = 32200 million km

The data details

Light (1.16 mkm/s) travels during 15558 s a distance =18048 million km (Uranus orbital circumference)

And

Light (300000 km/s) travels during this period 15558 s a distance = 4600 million km

(Neptune orbital distance = 4495 mkm – error 4%)

Neptune diameter be defined based on its orbital distance where

49528 seconds x (0.3)2 = 4495 million km

I try to show that – the data uses the same rules but through new situations – because the energy be reflected and that changed the situation where the rules still be used – for that reason the planets diameters be defined even without the cycles periods

A General Comment On The Data Which Proves Light Motion Defines Each Planet Orbit

(i)

The data proves light motion defines each planet orbit and the light moves from a planet orbit to another by a geometrical system causes the solar system to be similar to one chain or one series-

That proves ONE MOTION be the reason behind all planets orbits definition

The data explains my first equation which defines each planet orbital distance depend on its previous neighbor planet orbital distance

The planets orbits dependency is found by one motion which is light motion

The data gives a treasure to understand the real nature of the solar system

(ii)

The rate (1.88) refer to light motion effect on the planets orbits definition by using the rate (2π) –

The data tells – light motion connects each planet orbit by its previous neighbor by using the revolution circle (2π)- that means- the light motion which is in (straight line) caused the planet motion in elliptical trajectory (2π)- and that means – what's (straight line) for light motion be (elliptical form) for planet motion

Let's use example to explain that –

Light (300000 km/s) travels in a solar day (86400 seconds) a distance =25920 million km – but the precession cycle is 25920 years – we don't know (never) this distance 25920 mkm but we know this period 25920 years –means- the distance 25920 mkm is for light motion but we see it as 25920 years – both are one value

Similar to that – light moves in straight line – but this straight line for the planet be (elliptical trajectory) – it's a result of the observer position

(iii)

We should notice that – the 3 planets values which didn't follow the rule have the same one reason which is the using of the original light velocity (1.16 mkm/s) more than one time – this effect is repeated with the three planets proves that the rule is correct and the violation of the rule done because of the reflection of energy which caused to use the original light velocity (1.16 mkm/s) additional times

(iv)

The data proves one fact which is

(Based On One Motion All Planets Orbits Are Defined)

This fact is proved by the provided data in this point of discussion but this fact be proved by many other additional data because

My first equation proves each planet orbit depend on its neighbor orbit which can be produced only if all orbits be defined by One Motion

Also this same fact is proved by one more group of data – where – the planets distribution between the sun and Pluto depends on one map and this one map proves that one motion be found behind all planets orbits definition – this map be discussed in point no. (2)

Also the planets axial tilts analysis proves this fact tells – the planets orbits be defined based on one motion – because the planets axial tilts depend on another shows that one motion be behind all

(v)

The data proves clearly that light motion defines each planet orbit- and – Kepler stated planet orbit defines its velocity – in fact planet orbit defines its all data because the planets data be created based on the velocities rates – as following

Planet diameter, mass, orbital inclination and rotation period depend on the velocities rates and

Planet orbital distance depend on the velocities squared rates and

Planet orbital period depend on the velocities cubic rates

I want to say - Light motion defines each planet orbit and by that each planet data be defined based on its orbit – that means- light definition of the orbit contains the definition of all data for this planet –

Notice

In next pages I insert the details of each planet orbit definition based on light motion –

Mercury

Mercury Orbital Circumference = 360 Million Km

1.16 million km/ sec x 310 sec = 360 million km

300000 km per second x 310 seconds = 93 million km

93 million km x 2π = 586 million km

The data shows light (1.16 mkm/s) passes during 310 seconds a distance = 360 mkm = (Mercury Orbital Circumference).

This is the used system and the produced distance (586 million km) is the required number to define Venus Orbital Circumference – but – the light uses this distance as a period of time (586 seconds)

The data shows– light motion uses Mercury Orbit To Define Venus Orbit

That explains why each planet orbit depends on its neighbor orbit as be proved by my first equation.

The data proves– Light Motion Created The Planets And Caused Their Motions

Venus

Venus Orbital Circumference = 680 Million Km

1.16 million km per /sec x 586 sec = 680 million km

300000 km per second x 586 seconds = 175.9 million km

175.9 million km x 2π = 1105 million km

The data tells light (1.16 mkm/s) passes during 586 seconds a distance = 680 mkm = (Venus orbital circumference).

According the system- Light should use the period (1105s) for the Earth orbit -

But it's not true – the fact is that

1.16 million km per /sec x 810 sec = 940 million km (Earth orbital circumference)

Where

1105 million km = 810 million km x (1.16)2

Means

The distance (1.16 million km) uses the velocity (1.16 mkm/s) two times –

This is done because of the moon motion effect on the Earth motion -

In fact -

Venus defines The moon orbit at first (940 mkm) and based on this orbit the Earth orbit be defined (940 mkm) – where the 2 orbits are equal that causes the double using of the value (1.16)2 –

Notice

175.9 mkm refer to 175.9 days (Mercury Day Period) - And

810 s x 0.3 mkm/s = 243 mkm refer to 243 days (Venus rotation period)

That shows – each planet defines its previous neighbor Cycle period

And also that shows the period 810 s is the correct one for the Earth orbit because it produces the distance 243 mkm – means- the Earth orbit follows the system correctly but the double using of the velocity (1.16 mkm/s) is happened only as a result for the moon motion effect on the Earth motion – the next data will support this fact with more proves.

The Earth

Earth Orbital Circumference = 940 Million Km

1.16 million km per /sec x 1105 sec = 1282 million km

300000 km per second x 1105 seconds = 331.5 million km

331.5 million km x 2π = 2082 million km

We use the same system to define the next planet after the Earth –

We know The Earth orbital circumference (940 mkm) be defined by the period 810 s – but here we use the period (1105s) to follow the same line of data

Notice

331.5 days (= 327.6 days = The Moon Sidereal Year) (error 1%)

The Earth orbit defines the moon sidereal year – proves that – the double using of the velocity (1.16 mkm/s) is done by the moon effect on the Earth motion.

Notice

Mars original orbit was between Mercury and Venus and Mars had migrated for that Mars orbit isn't defined in the basic system of the light motion because Mars had migrated. (Mars Migration Theory Point no. 9)

The distance be produced by the Earth orbit (2082 mkm) will be used for Jupiter but it uses the double value (2 x 2082)

Jupiter

Jupiter Orbital Circumference = 4900 Million Km

1.16 million km per /sec x 2082 sec x 2 = 4830 million km

300000 km per second x 2082 sec x 2 = 629 million km x 2

629 million km x 4π = 7855 million km (629 million km = Earth Jupiter Distance)

The data tells light (1.16 mkm/s) passes during 2082 x 2 seconds a distance = 4830 million km = (Jupiter orbital circumference 4900 mkm error 1.4%).

Notice

The data shows – Earth orbit caused to create Jupiter orbit but the data uses only the rate (2) – that may because of Mars effect on the data – also – the other number is (629 mkm) which is the distance between Jupiter and Earth – and this distance isn't used as a cycle period – we remember in Mercury, Venus and Earth these distances were (175.9 and 243 and 327.6) which be used as cycles periods – but this part of the system is stopped here and no longer provides a cycle period may that be also Mars effect of the data.

We see clearly the light motion travels from a planet orbit to another to create them depending on one another – here we see light motion is a fact proved clearly

The produced distance (7855 mkm) will be as a period of time for Saturn orbit

Saturn

Saturn Orbital Circumference = 9000 Million Km

1.16 million km per /sec x 7855 sec = 9100 million km

300000 km per second x 7855 seconds = 2356 million km

2356 million km x 2π = 14804 million km

The data tells light (1.16 mkm/s) passes during 7855 seconds a distance = 9100 mkm = (Saturn orbital circumference 9000 mkm error 1%).

The produced distance 14804 mkm will be used as a period of time for Uranus Orbit.

Uranus

Uranus Orbital Circumference = 18048 Million Km

1.16 million km per /sec x 14804 sec = 17173 million km

300000 km per second x 14804 seconds = 4444 million km

4444 million km x 2π = 27923 million km

The data tells light (1.16 mkm/s) passes during 14804 seconds a distance =17173 mkm = (Uranus orbital circumference 18048 mkm error 5%).

The produced distance (27923 mkm) will be used as a period of time for Pluto orbit

Notice

The distance 27923 mkm = Neptune orbital circumference (28244 mkm) (error 1%)

Pluto

Pluto Orbital Circumference = 37100 Million Km

1.16 million km per /sec x 27923 sec = 32400 million km

1.16 million km per /sec x 32400 sec = 37572 million km

(the error between 37100 and 37572 be 1.3%)

300000 km per second x 27923 seconds = 8377 million km

The data tells light (1.16 mkm/s) passes during 27923 seconds a distance = 37572

Mkm (Pluto orbital circumference 37100 million km – error 1.3%) – but the data uses the light velocity double times –

Notice

The data shows, Neptune and Pluto orbits depend on Uranus orbit and this fact is proved also by my first equation – but – Neptune orbital circumference is created by some strange method for the system that may affect on Pluto data and caused to use the light velocity in double value.

Discussion

(1)

The massive importance of this data is (The Light Continuous Motion Through The Solar System) – shortly – all planets orbits are connected together with one another by light motion which proves that the light creates these orbits and (more important) the light creates a continuum of data through the solar system

This is the idea I provide under my theory – and this is the idea I prove by all means – the solar system is NOT separated planets (rigid bodies) – on the contrary- it's a continuum of data – one river of water – in some parts this water be in solid form (as ice) and in other parts the water be in liquid form – but all be created from the same one water –

Means- the planets matters and their distances be created from the same one source of energy which is one light beam its velocity 1.16 million km per second.

The continuum is the major discovery in the solar system vision

As a result – the planets be geometrical points on the same light beam – and the planets be similar to carriages in the same one train – and the train is the light beam - the planets move with this light beam motion.

This fact is decisive to understand the planets motions because the planets move equal distances in equal periods of time (why?) because the light beam moves one motion passes one distance in one period of time – for that – the planets have to pass this same distance and in this same period of time – and because the planets velocities are less than light velocity that necessitates to create a geometrical design to perform the basic requirement which is (the planets have to move equal distances in equal periods of time)

(2)

The light defines each planet orbit depends on its neighbor orbit –

This fact is proved clearly in the data- this meaning is proved by my first equation

(3)

Mars orbit isn't defined in the data because Mars had migrated from its original orbit (84 million km) where Mars original position was between Mercury and Venus and Mars had migrated to its current orbit (227.9 million km)

Mars orbit is out of the data chain but it still follows the rule for that

Light (1.16 million km/s) travels during 1235s a distance = 1433 mkm = Mars orbital circumference – and light (300000 km/s) travels during 1235 s a distance 371 mkm

Now the distance 371 mkm be used as a period of time for the Earth (where Earth orbital period =365.25 days with the number 371 the error is 1.5%)

By that Mars orbit also defines its neighbor cycle period – let's examine this feature in following…

(4)

Venus orbit defines the distance 175.9 million km and

The Earth moon orbit (around the sun) defines the distance 243 million km and

The Earth orbit defines the distance 331 million km and

Mars orbit defines the distance 371 million km where

1875.9 days = Mercury Day Period

243 days = Venus rotation period

327.6 days = The moon sidereal year (with 331 the error 1%)

365.25 days = The Earth Orbital Period (with 371 the error 1.5 %)

Clearly each inner planet defines its neighbor cycle period where this period be produced in a distance form by light motion –

3 LIGHT DEFINES EACH PLANET ROTATION PERIOD

Data

(1)

(153.3/24) = (29.8/4.7) = 6.4

(2)

(24/24.6) = (24.1 x 2 x 0.3) /(4.7π)

(3)

(9.9/24) = (29.8 x 2 x (0.3)2)/ (13.1)

(4)

(10.7/24) = (24.1 x 2 x (0.3)2) /(9.7)

(5)

(17.2/24) = (6.8 x 2 x (0.3)) /(5.4) (error 5.5%)

(6)

(16.1/24) = (5.4 x 4 x (0.3)) /(9.7)

Discussion

Data No. (3)

(9.9/24) = (29.8 x 2 x (0.3)2)/ (13.1)

Where

9.9 hours = Jupiter Rotation Period

29.8 km/s = Earth velocity

13.1 km/s = Jupiter velocity

Let's analyze the data in following

(1)

The data tells –Jupiter rotation period be defined as a function in the period (24 h) by using the light velocity (300000 km/s) as a reference and Earth velocity as a partner in motion

We know that – Jupiter uses The Earth moon velocity in its planet diameter equation here – Jupiter rotation period be defined based on the Jupiter and Earth velocities –and- the definition be done by using light velocity as a measurement and reference because the motion be done by light motion –

We need to observe the period (24 h) in Jupiter equation because this period be used for all other planets as a reference because this period is the used one by light motion and because the equation defines Jupiter rotation period by using the light motion as a reference that makes the equation uses the period (24 h) which is the time period of the light motion

Please remember - light supposed velocity (1.16 million km/s) travels in the solar day period (24 h) a distance = 100733 million = (The planets orbital circumferences total) that explains why the equation uses (24 hours) as a reference for all planets rotation period -

(2)

This equation (data) is important because it shows the planet rotation period be defined based on the velocities rate and based on the planet rotation period this planet diameter be defined by my fourth equation – that shows the data connection

In this point we need to observe the following –

This equation is reflected one because Jupiter equation to define its diameter uses also a reflected form (also Saturn does that) – for that reason this equation which defines Jupiter rotation period uses also a reflected form.

For that reason the light velocity (300000 km/s) be used two times for Jupiter and Saturn- this using is produced because Jupiter and Saturn equations to define their diameters use reflected forms- please review planet diameter equation Point no. (E)

(3)

The equation uses the rate (2) with all planets but with Neptune it uses the rate (4) -

Notice / Jupiter diameter equation uses the moon velocity in place of the Earth velocity in the current equation – that tells Jupiter motion be a partner inside the interaction between the Earth and its moon motions- please remember that Jupiter orbit definition by light motion depends on the Earth and moon data Not Mars.

Notice

The Earth and Pluto equation is the basic one in this data we discuss it at end because it explains the whole process clearly .

Data No. (4)

(10.7/24) = (24.1 x 2 x (0.3)2) /(9.7)

Where

10.7 hours = Saturn Rotation Period

24.1 km/s = Mars Velocity

9.7 km/s = Saturn Velocity

Saturn equation is a typical one to Jupiter Equation where no any change is found – completely the equation tells the same meaning clearly and confirms the using of the velocities rate to define the planet rotation period under the effect of light velocity (300000 km/s) –

We notice only (Jupiter and Saturn) use light velocity (300000 km/s) two times because of their reflected forms in planet diameter equation- all other planets use the light velocity one time only

Data No. (5)

(17.2/24) = (6.8 x 2 x (0.3)) /(5.4) (error 5.5%)

Where

17.2 hours = Uranus Rotation Period

6.8 km/s = Uranus Velocity

5.4 km/s = Neptune Velocity

Uranus equation shows the ordinary form of the equation and proves the reflected form be used by Saturn and Jupiter – the equation has a great error more than 5%

Also

Uranus uses Neptune velocity which is used also in its equation to define its diameter

Data No. (6)

(16.1/24) = (5.4 x 4 x (0.3)) /(9.7)

Where

16.1 hours = Neptune Rotation Period

5.4 km/s = Neptune Velocity

9.7 km/s = Saturn Velocity

Neptune Equation is a typical one for Uranus equation but no error be found in it (the error is less than 1%) –

The equation also proves Jupiter and Saturn use reflected equations.

Data No. (2)

(24/24.6) = (24.1 x 2 x 0.3) /(4.7π)

Where

24.6 hours = Mars Rotation Period

4.7 km/s = Pluto Velocity

24.1 km/s = Mars Velocity

Mars equation changed numerator and denominator but can't be a reflected one because it use light velocity one time only – and this is done as a result of the Earth data effect on Mars motion – this meaning will be more clear with the Earth equation discussion – where – The Earth and Mars both depend on Pluto velocity that causes a deep interaction in the data can be explained with the Earth Equation discussion.

Data No. (1)

(153.3/24) = (29.8/4.7) = 6.4

Where

153.3 hours = Pluto Rotation Period

4.7 km/s = Pluto Velocity

29.8 km/s = The Earth Velocity

We have 2 points to refer in the Earth equation

(1) No light velocity be used here – And – Earth uses the period 24 hours

(2) The 2 planets velocities rates be equal their days periods

That means – the machine aim to create this result as a goal – means – the machine goal is to make Earth and Pluto velocities rates be = their days periods! Why? because by that …….

Pluto moves in its day period (153.3 hours) a distance = 2.59 million km and

The Earth motion distance in its day period (24 hours) be = 2.57 million km and

The moon displacements total in its day period (29.53 days) = 2.59 million km

The three distances are equal (error 1%)

This equality is an essential requirement for the planets motions- later we will discuss the rate of time be used for the planets motions- but here I refer to it shortly

The rate of time depends on the velocities rates – means- Earth velocity = 6.3 Pluto velocity by that (one hour of Earth clock be = 6.3 hours of Pluto clock) –

As a result (153.3 hour of Pluto clock will be = 24 hours of the Earth clock)

Why is this necessary? Because the Earth and Pluto move equal distances in these 2 periods – and if these 2 periods be equal in (the amount of time) – that makes the 2 planets move (equal distances) in (equal periods of time) –

And why do we need that?? ….Because

The solar system is one light beam – the planets move as carriages in one train and the light motion is this train engine – now – the light moves one motion and passes one distance in one period of time – means – all planets have to move this same distance in this same period of time – shortly – the planets have to move equal distances in equal periods of time – the light uses its velocity along all planets to enable the Earth and Pluto to move equal distances in equal periods of time (without light motion help) means – the light created the system by which the planets (can) move equal distances in equal periods of time (without light velocity) depending on the planets own velocities only –

I want to say –

We should not look at the data individually for each planet because the leader is one which is the light motion and the leader uses the players for different jobs to perform the required general task –

There's one more reason – we should discuss with my fourth equation discussion – but I write this reason here and the respectful reader can review it after the fourth equation discussion (Planet diameter definition equation)– The equation uses the moon cycles equality as its base because the moon orbital period = the moon rotation period=27.3 days and by that the rate (s) in the equation be equal (=1)

And

The equation depend on 3 basic points which are–the moon, Saturn and Pluto because

The moon where (The Moon Rotation Period = The Moon Orbital Period=27.3 d)

Saturn where (Saturn Rotation Velocity = Saturn Orbital Velocity)

Pluto (The Solar System End Point)

For Pluto – the Equation should create equality of DISTANCES

This distances equality be produced by the rate (153.3/24) = (29.8/4.7)

And because of that –

Pluto moves in its day period (153.3 h) a distance = 2.598 mkm = the Earth motion distance in its day period (24 h) = the moon displacements total in its day period (29.53 days) (error 1%)

These equality of the three distances be essential for the planet diameter equations to enable the equation to work sufficiently – that explains why Pluto moves in solar day a distance = 406000 km = the planets diameters total= the moon orbital apogee radius

Please review Planet diameter equation (my fourth equation) (point no. E)

Notice /this point data depend on the planet diameter equation for that the equation can be used as a reference for this data – but the equation doesn't use light velocity – I try to show that – light motion defines the data based on geometrical rules for that we can conclude the data by light motion or by this rule the light use in the data creation.

4 LIGHT DEFINES EACH PLANET ORBITAL PERIOD

Data

(1)

4879 x (0.3)2 = 88 x 4.93 (error 1%)

(2)

12104 x (0.3)2 = 224.7 x 4.93

(3)

12756 x (0.3)2 = 365.25 x π

(4)

3475 x (0.3)2 = 327.6 (error 5%)

(5)

6792 x (0.3)2 = 611

(6)

142984 x (0.3)2 = 4331 x π (error 5%)

(7)

120536 x (0.3)2 = 10747 (error 1%)

(8)

2 x 51118 x (0.3) = 30589

(9)

49528 x (0.3)2 = 4495

(10)

2390 x (0.3) = 717

Data Analysis

The data provides the planets diameters in order – where – (4879 km is Mercury diameter – and 2390 km is Pluto diameter) –

Each diameter be used as a period of time for light motion based on the rate (1 km = 1 second) – By that (Mercury diameter 4879 km be used as 4879 seconds)

The rate (0.3)^2 refers to light velocity (0.3 million km per second) be used for 2 times

The produced values are the planets orbital periods in order – by that - (88 days = Mercury orbital period, 224.7 days = Venus orbital period)

We have three exceptions which are:

Mars – where – its orbital period = 687 days but the produced number is 611

Pluto– where – its orbital period = 90560 days but the produced number is 711

And

Neptune – its number is 4495 where Neptune orbital distance = 4495 million km – that means – the data produced Neptune orbital distance in place of Neptune orbital period – there's a geometrical reason for that we discussed in point no. (3)

Mercury and Venus use the rate 4.93 = (π2/2) for their data – this also be done for a geometrical reason.

Discussion

The using of light velocity (0.3 mkm/s) two times be done for the data consistency and the energy reflection - the idea is that – planet diameter is considered as a period of time where my fourth equation defines each planet diameter as a function in its rotation period – that makes the diameter as equivalent to a period of time –

and

The light uses this period to pass a defined distance – and – then uses the distance (as a period of time) to pass another distance – by that – the first value and the third one be of the same type (time) and the second be a distance – that’s seen in the data the input is a planet diameter (period of time) and the output is a planet orbital period (period of time) that's why the light velocity is used two times – Uranus shows an exceptional for this rule for geometrical necessity

Where Uranus motion distance per solar day equal 0.6 million km (2%) – that effect on the data and caused Uranus to use the light velocity one time only

Notice

I wish to make my idea as clear as possible – the solar system is one light beam – and the light creates each planet matter and its distance – and by that – all data in the solar system be created by light motion – this is the absolute real fact –

And the solar system is so accurate machine and its data be defined accurately-

But – as we see the light creates the solar system and causes its motion by the geometrical rules be used by light motion – here – there are many effects cause to deforms the used rules – this idea is simple for us – for example we know the body makes recovery from any wound may suffer but sometimes the wound be so great and the recovery process couldn't produce the same original result but created some deformation in the body

For that the rule be used clearly but not so strictly – because – if the rule be violated the machine will not stop- instead – it created a configuration as we see in the data

For our discussion

We have 3 planets out of the rule why? because Mars And Pluto Has Migrated- Mars original orbit was between Mercury and Venus and Mars had migrated – also Pluto was The Mercury moon revolves around it – but Pluto had migrated with Mars migration – that explain why they don't follow the rule –

Then the third planet (Neptune) – Neptune orbital circumference be created after Pluto migration – this story is discussed in point no. (9) and Neptune orbital circumference is distinguished in all data – also in the light definition of the planets orbits Neptune orbit is so distinguish because the light defined Neptune and Pluto orbits reflected to one another – that makes Neptune orbit to be distinguish among the planets data – please review the light motion definition of the planets orbits (Point no. I-2)

Notice

In the first table which defines each planet orbit by light motion – Jupiter data produced also the distance 611 million km

Means we can use this distance to define Mars diameter by its orbit data – but still the orbital period isn't defined - but that connects the data together to show that this all data depend on one motion which is the light motion

And –

Also Neptune orbit be defined by light motion based on Uranus orbit by (different way) – because Neptune and Pluto orbits be defined reflected on one another – shortly

28244 x (1.16)2 = 37100

Where

228244 million km = Neptune Orbital Circumference

37100 million km = Pluto Orbital Circumference

That explains why Neptune diameter be defined based on Neptune orbital distance and not Neptune orbital period –

I wish the data proves clearly my theory

Let's look as deep as possible

If the planets are rigid bodies and revolve around the sun by the mass gravity – why does data makes this mistake and use Neptune orbital distance in place of its orbital period? this strange behavior how can be explained based on the classical description? – BUT – very simple by my theory I can explain that – because – the light uses the period of time and distance exchangeable and this is one case in which the light has obligation to use a distance in place of a period of time and vice versa – it’s a natural result of the energy reflection which is done in the solar system three times –

the energy reflection at Neptune is proved in light motion definition for the planets orbits (point no. I-2) and here in this point the data supports this proof and also in the next point no. (I-5) more details proves this same fact – which forces the light to define Neptune diameter based on its orbital distance and not its orbital period.

5 LIGHT DEFINES THE SOLAR SYSTEM BASIC DESIGN

Data

Group No. (1)

32200 million km = 0.3 mkm/s x 107470 seconds

32200 million km = 1.16 mkm/s x 28244 seconds

37100 million km = 1.16 mkm/s x 32200 seconds

2 x 4830 million km = 0.3 mkm/s x 32200 seconds

2872 million km = (0.32) x 32200 seconds

25920 million km = 32200 days x 2 x 0.406 mkm/day

32200 x 24.6 hours x π = 103944 x 24 hours

Group No. (2)

32200 million km cos (28.7 deg) = 28244 million km

32200 million km sin (34.4 deg) = 18048 million km

32200 million km sin (53.6 deg) = 25920 million km

32200 million km sin (16.1 deg) = 9010 million km

32200 million km sin (8.8 deg) = 4900 million km

32200 million km sin (17.5 deg) = 4840 million km x 2

Group No. (3)

32200 days x 4.095 million km = 131860 million km

32200 days x 3.024 million km = 97373 million km

32200 days x 2.574 million km = 82883 million km

32200 days x 2.4 million km = 77280 million km

32200 days x 2.082 million km = 67041 million km

32200 days x 1.13184 million km = 36445 million km

32200 days x 0.838 million km = 26984 million km

32200 days x 0.5875 million km = 18920 million km

32200 days x 0.46688 million km = 15034 million km

32200 days x 0.406 million km = 25920 million km/ 2

Discussion

The distance 32200 million km is the solar system central distance – the next data refers to its importance

(1)

100733 million km = 32200 million km x π

Where

100733 million km = The Planets Orbital Circumferences Total

32200 million km = The different distance between Pluto Orbital Circumference and Jupiter Orbital Circumference (32200 = 37100 - 4900)

(2)

Neptune and Pluto orbits depend on this distance because

Light original velocity (1.16 mkm/s) passes in a period (28244 seconds) a distance = 32200 million km

And

Light original velocity (1.16 mkm/s) passes in a period (32200 seconds) a distance = 37100 million km

Where

37100 million km = Pluto Orbital Circumference And

28244 million km = Neptune Orbital Circumference

The data shows that – Neptune and Pluto orbits be reflected on one another – where the light motion uses the same value for both planets orbits – in the discussion of the distance 32200 mkm we will analyze this subject to more deep analysis.

Notice

The analysis of the distance 32200 mkm depend on the group no. (3) but the rest groups be found to refer to the effect range of this distance – we refer to all data details and analyze deeply the third group –

Let's start the data analysis

Group No. (1)

32200 million km = 0.3 mkm/s x 107470 seconds

32200 million km = 1.16 mkm/s x 28244 seconds

37100 million km = 1.16 mkm/s x 32200 seconds

2 x 4830 million km = 0.3 mkm/s x 32200 seconds

2872 million km = (0.32) x 32200 seconds

25920 million km = 32200 days x 2 x 0.406 mkm/day

32200 x 24.6 hours x π = 103944 x 24 hours

10747 days = Saturn orbital period

28244 million km = Neptune Orbital Circumference

37100 million km = Pluto Orbital Circumference

4900 million km = Jupiter Orbital Circumference

2872 million km = Uranus Orbital Distance

25920 million km = light (300000 km/s) motion distance in a solar day

0.406 million km = Pluto motion distance per solar day

103944 hours = Jupiter Orbital Period

Group No. (2)

32200 million km cos (28.7 deg) = 28244 million km

32200 million km sin (34.4 deg) = 18048 million km

32200 million km sin (53.6 deg) = 25920 million km

32200 million km sin (16.1 deg) = 9010 million km

32200 million km sin (8.8 deg) = 4900 million km

32200 million km sin (17.5 deg) = 4840 million km x 2

28244 million km = Neptune Orbital Circumference

18048 million km = Uranus Orbital Circumference

9010 million km = Saturn Orbital Circumference

4900 million km = Jupiter Orbital Circumference

28.3 degrees = Neptune Axial Tilt

34.4 degrees = 2 x 17.2 degrees (Pluto orbital inclination)

17.4 degrees = The Inner Planets Orbital Inclinations Total

We notice that – Neptune orbital circumference be defined based on the distance 32200 mkm by (Neptune axial tilt) and Uranus orbit definition depend on Pluto orbital inclination (17.2 deg) – also – the inner planets orbital inclinations total (17.4 deg) defines the distance (2 x 4840 mkm) where Jupiter orbital circumference be 4900 million km (error 1%)

In fact – the four inner planet orbital circumferences total = 3413 million km

But (4900 = 3413 +1433 "Mars orbital circumference =1433 mkm")

Means- if we consider the Earth moon orbital circumference around the sun be equal Mars orbital circumference – the five planets orbital circumferences total be =4840 mkm- this value depend on the angle (17.4 deg)

In fact – I don't know why the solar system considers the moon orbital circumference around the sun = 1433 mkm – this fact I have met frequently in different data

Now – let's analyze deeply the distance 32200 mkm in the data third group

Group No. (3)

32200 days x 4.095 million km = 131860 million km

32200 days x 3.024 million km = 97373 million km

32200 days x 2.574 million km = 82883 million km

32200 days x 2.4 million km = 77280 million km

32200 days x 2.082 million km = 67041 million km

32200 days x 1.13184 million km = 36445 million km

32200 days x 0.838 million km = 26984 million km

32200 days x 0.5875 million km = 18920 million km

32200 days x 0.46688 million km = 15034 million km

32200 days x 0.406 million km = 25920 million km/ 2

In this data – each planet in order uses the value (32200) as a period of time (32200 solar days) and the data shows the passed distance be each planet motion during this period of time

Let's analyze these distances- I start with the three last planets (Uranus, Neptune and Pluto)

Data Analysis Part No. (I)

32200 days x 0.5875 million km = 18920 million km

Light (300000 km/s) travels a distance 18920 million km in a period (63000 s)

Notice (during 204500 s x 0.32 = 18500 million km "error 2.5%") and

204500 = 4 x 51118 s where 51118 km = Uranus diameter

32200 days x 0.46688 million km = 15034 million km

Light (300000 km/s) travels during 49528 s a distance = 15034 million km (error 1%)

Where 49528 km = Neptune Diameter

32200 days x 0.406 million km = 25920 million km/ 2

Light (300000 km/s) travels during 25920 seconds a distance = 7770 mkm

Pluto circumference 7510 km (with 7770 mkm the error 3.5%)

Shortly light motion defines each planet diameter based on its motion distance BUT with different using

We have to look deeply at the data because no outer data be used – the data be limited clearly on the input and the rule be used strictly but the using of light motion be changed – that proves a reflection of energy be found between these planets because the light deals with some data as a distance and the other data light uses as a period that makes each planet orbit be reflected on the other – this fact we have seen in the Neptune orbit definition by light motion in point no. (I-2)

The light deals in both sides and on each side there's a planet and that makes the planets be reflected on one another

Shortly

Uranus diameter be defined by (the passed distance /(4x 0.32)

Neptune diameter be defined by (the passed distance /0.3) and

Pluto diameter be defined by (the passed distance x 2 x 0.3)

We deal with the same data but light motion changes its approach to the data

Data Analysis Part No. (II)

Here we deal with the next three planets (Saturn- Jupiter- Mars)

32200 days x 0.838 million km = 26984 million = 0.3 mkm/s x 90000 s

Saturn moves per solar day a distance =0.838 million km –

The number (90000 km) isn't related to Saturn almost! We need to know what's happening – let's see Jupiter motion

32200 days x 1.1318 million km = 36445 million = 0.3 mkm/s x 121484 s

120536 km = Saturn diameter (with 121484 the error 1%)

Jupiter moves per solar day a distance =1.13184 million km –

By that Jupiter passes in 32200 days a distance = 36445 mkm- and light (300000 km/s) passes this distance in 121484 seconds

Shortly

Saturn diameter be defined by Jupiter motion and not by Saturn motion! why?

Because the energy be reflected inside Saturn and by that the data before Saturn be reflected on the data after Saturn- as a result – Saturn velocity be reflected with Jupiter velocity as many other planets – let's see that in following

(1/0.838) = 1.1318 (error 5%) and

(1/0.406) = 2.4 (error 2.5%) and

(1/0.46688) = 2.082 (error 2.5%)

where

0.838 mkm daily = Saturn Velocity

1.1318 mkm daily = Jupiter Velocity

0.406 mkm daily = Pluto Velocity

2.4 mkm daily = The Moon Velocity

0.46688 mkm daily = Neptune Velocity

2.082 mkm daily = Mars Velocity

The six planets velocities are reflected on one another – shortly – if the planet diameter definition uses the rate (1/planet velocity) – in this case the definition will use the velocity (1.1318 mkm daily) because it's Saturn velocity in form (1/A)

I want to say –

The reflection of energy changes the light method to use the data – and if the reflection changes the method in Saturn case the velocity will be (1.1318) and not (0.838) -

I wish I can explain how the data be created – the light motion is so intelligent and deals by different methods with the planets data according to the different situations around and for that the data be used in reflected forms

32200 days x 2.082 million km = 67041 million = 0.3 mkm/s x 223470 s

(But 223470 s = π x 71132 s= π2 x 22642 s)

Mars velocity daily is 2.082 million km – and Mars moves in 32200 days a distance = 67041 mkm – light (300000 km/s) passes this distance in a period 223470 s

Where 71132 km = Jupiter radius and

21346.6 km = Mars Circumference (with 22642 km the error 6%)

Means – Jupiter and Mars diameters be defined by the same equation depends on one another – we notice that Jupiter diameter be defined also by Mercury motion

Data Analysis Part No. (III)

Here we deal with the rest four planets (Mercury – Venus – the moon – The Earth)

32200 days x 4.095 million km = 131860 million km = 0.3 x 439530 s

(But 131860 s x 0.3 mkm/s = 39560 mkm)

Mercury (4.095 mkm daily) moves in 32200 days a distance = 131860 mkm, The light passes this distance in (439530s and 449197 km = Jupiter circumference – error 2% )

Mercury motion defines Jupiter circumference because Jupiter diameter = 8 planets diameters total and by that Jupiter refers to a collective behavior and Mercury is the head of the group –

(Notice/ Mercury day period =176 days because the 9 planets velocities =176 km/s)

This data is explained in the theory discussion – I refer to it to prove that – Mercury uses the collective behavior as Jupiter

Please note,

Light (300000 km/s) during 131860 s moves 39560 mkm – where

40000 km = the Earth Circumference = The 5 Planets Diameters Total

For that the number (40000) is produced by all inner planets and no any planet diameter be referred here – all planets data refer to the total (40000)

32200 days x 2.4 million km = 77280 million km = 0.3 x 257600

The moon velocity daily is 2.4 mkm and in 32200 days it passes a distance = 77280 mkm which be passed by light (300000 km/s) in 257600 s = π x 40892 s

(40892 is different from 40000 by error 2.5%)

Again the data refers to the Earth circumference 40000 km = the 5 inner planets diameters total

(notice 257600 hours = 24 x 10747 days "Saturn orbital period")

32200 days x 3.024 million km = 97373 million km = 0.3 x 29200 s

Venus velocity daily is 3.024 mkm and in 32200 days it passes a distance = 97373 mkm which be passed by light (300000 km/s) in 29200 s = 3600 x (16.1/2)

(where 16.1 h = Neptune rotation period)

32200 days x 2.574 million km = 82883 million km = 0.3 x 276276 s

The Earth velocity daily is 2.57 mkm and in 32200 days it passes a distance =82883 mkm which be passed by light (300000 km/s) in 276276 s = (π x 88000 s)

(the moon daily displacement is 88000 km)

A General Comment Of The Analysis Of The Distance 32200 Mkm

(1)

Many ideas be seen as strange in this distance analysis – at least – we accept the planet diameter be considered as a period of time for many reasons – first because of my fourth equation (planet diameter equation) which defines each planet diameter as a function in its rotation period – the equation be tested in point no. (E) – also the planet diameter be used as a period of time is a feature of data discovered and proved for example

Jupiter (13.1 km/s) moves during 10921 s a distance = 142984 km = Jupiter diameter

Uranus (6.8 km/s) moves during 7510 s a distance =51118 km = Uranus diameter

Pluto (4.7 km/s) moves during 10921 s a distance =51118 km = Uranus diameter

Pluto (4.7 km/s) moves during 51118 s a distance =2 x 102536 km = Saturn diameter

Pluto (4.7 km/s) moves during 2 x 120536 s a distance =1.1318 mkm

(1.13184 mkm = Jupiter motion distance per solar day)

10921 km = The Moon Circumference and 7510 km = Pluto Circumference

The data shows the planets diameters be used as periods of time (for planets motions) also and not only for light motion – the fact is proved simply

(2)

The planets diameters are defined by light motion because light defines all data in the solar system – by that – this data is a part of the whole map based on which the light created the solar system and all planets data and the space data in its geometrical design and features

The solar system is one garment and the light motion is the needle and spindle by which the textile be created – the whole garment be created by light motion as the needle of tailor which makes the garment- this part of data is a point of the massive amount of data which the light used to create the solar system

(3)

We need to notice here only the massive effect of this distance – because- it shows different methods for light motion using and by that this distance can be used as a mirror which shows the details of the energy reflection inside the solar system

It's very important distance because we can move with its details to see how the energy be stored in the outer planets distances and how it be reflected – also we can see as clear as possible each part of the energy reflection and how this is done technically

The energy reflection is a massive proof for the space mechanical features

The energy reflection be proved in details in point no. (3)

6 THE ENERGY DISTRIBUTION THROUGH THE SOLAR SYSTEM

Here we analyze the energy distribution through the solar system – this distribution can help to see clearly how the machine works

(1)

We accept the space is energy – and – I claim that the energy be reflected in the solar system – in fact – the reflection of energy is the most strong point of my paper proves – it's simply the point of the paper fighting – the energy reflection proves the space has mechanical features

Now – the simple analysis can refer to the dilemma – because – the outer planets have great distances (energy) and if this energy be reflected toward the inner planets it will be as a flood of water moves toward a city and houses.

It's not very clear – how the inner planets can store this huge energy because their distances are so short and can't store such massive energy

The fact is that – the data is reflected on both sides – that means- thousands of the planets data be reflected on one another – this reflection of data should depend on a geometrical reason –

(2)

As example for the data reflection

The inner planets original order (Mercury – Mars – Venus – Earth) shows the planets order in their diameters, masses and orbital distances – Because Mars had migrated from its original orbit (between Mercury and Venus), Mars deformed this good order

The order shows clearly (Greater Diameter Necessitates Greater Orbital Distance)

The outer planets order is reflected clearly (Jupiter- Saturn- Uranus –Neptune – Pluto) the order shows that greater diameter necessitates shorter orbital distance – this is a clear reflection of data

The question again - if the outer planets energy be reflected how the inner planets short distances can store this massive energy?

The inner planets don't store the energy – instead – The Energy Be Used To Produce The Sun Rays.

(3)

The sun rays creation theory is discussed in details in the theory – let's summarize the idea in following…

The solar system is one light beam – the light minimum velocity is 300000 km/s- the planets are ships sail over the sea and the sea is the light beam

By that the sea water and the ship move by the same velocity – by that – the solar system moves by the velocity (300000 km/s) – the sun is a stationary point has no motion relative to the sea water velocity –

How can this stationary point be created? it's the vortex in the sea water

The planets revolve around a point in space – their revolutions cause to create 2 velocities on both sides of this point – the two velocities are equal and opposite in direction – the total velocity on this point be Zero- the revolution wave moves by the sea wave velocity and by that the point be stationary relative to the planets revolution velocity and to the sea water velocity – by that – the revolution causes to create a different velocity equal the sea water velocity (300000 km/s) and we see the sun as a light beam – why??

Because the creature brain uses light velocity (300000 km/s) in thinking – that means- when the creature looks at a light beam it be similar to a light beam looks at another light beam – the special theory of relativity tells (if one light looks at another light beam) they will see each other as matters (Particles)- why? because no difference in velocities

For that we see all motions with velocity (300000 km/s) as matters around us– the sun motion velocity is (Zero) that creates the different velocity (300000 km/s) and caused to see the sun rays as light beams

(4)

Shortly

The planets motions energies be stored in the outer planets massive distances to store massive amounts of energy (because the light beam be produced based on quantum) and the energy be reflected from the outer planets to the inner planets – and the inner planets use the energy to produce the sun rays by that the energy is not stored in the inner planets distances but be used immediately

Also – that means- the sun is not doing nuclear fusion to create its rays but the planets motions energies total be used as a source for the sun rays production

Notice

The Earth mass equal the rest inner planets masses total (error 1%) – if we imagine that – from a great gamma ray the inner planets be created – and – the Earth be the great electron and the other inner planets be the great positron –

Where– the great electron means (its atom has a positive charge and electrons revolve around) and the great positron means (its atom has a negative charge and positrons revolve around)-

This idea has a advantage because it creates an electric field between the inner planets – this electric field can be so useful to create the sun rays because the sun rays creation depends on a geometrical design and the electric field can provide the accuracy by which the geometrical design can be produced – here we have important notice – because the outer planets store massive amounts of energy (the accuracy here isn't necessary) but the inner planets use this energy to produce the sun rays (or the stationary point) where this process needs accurate geometrical effects which can be supported simply by the electric fields – also – the creation of electron and positron by gamma ray is experiment be proved empirically – only – I suppose – after the inner planets matters creation the original light beam is not finished but created also the outer planets from the same one light beam energy.

(5)

Why Is The Data Reflected Between The 2 Sides?

The energy be reflected from Pluto to Venus and then from Venus to Mars –

There's another reflection be done inside Saturn for the wave be sent from Pluto to Venus

The reflection of energy caused to reflect the data- but – in details – the reflection caused (the distance) to be used as (a period of time) and another reflection causes (the period of time) be used as (a distance) one more time – by that- the planets which have many reflections can put their data in ordinary order but the planets which have one reflection only have to put their data in reflected form – that shows how the data be reflected on both sides –

Let's use one example

(a)

Jupiter orbital circumference =4900 million km

Uranus orbital period = 4900 days x 2π

This data depend on the reflection be done inside Saturn, that makes the data before Saturn be reflected on the data after Saturn

We need to follow the rate (2π) because this is the key of the data understanding

(b)

Another reflection be done between Venus and Mars for that

680 million km = Venus orbital circumference

687 days = Mars orbital period - And

224.7 days = Venus orbital period

227.9 million km = Mars orbital distance

The data shows clearly that the rate (2π) be found between Mars and Venus

(c)

Pluto orbital distance 5906 million km = Earth orbital distance 149.6 million km x 4π2

We see the data clearly

The two rates (2π) be balanced by (4π2) between the Earth and Pluto

But

The rates (2π) be used between (A Distance On One Side And A Period On Another)

For the Earth case – the rate (4π2) be used between 2 Distances

The data which is reflected in the outer planets, be reflected one more time in the inner planets and by that the inner planets show ordinary order of the data but the outer planets data still be reflected.

Notice / there's one more (2π) between Mars and Saturn because Saturn orbital distance = Mars orbital circumference and this (2π) be used also between two distances.

Thanks a lot – kind regards

Please read

Planet Diameter Equation Shows The Matter Origin (The Proves Discussions)

Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292

Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty

Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)

Curriculum Vitae https://www.academia.edu/s/b88b0ecb7c

E-mail [email protected], [email protected]

[email protected]

ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147

Facebook https://www.facebook.com/gergis.tawadrous

VK https://vk.com/id696655587

Tumblr https://www.tumblr.com/blog/itsgerges

Researcherid https://publons.com/researcher/3510834/gerges-tawadrous/

Google https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=2Y4ZdTUAAAAJ&hl=en

Livejournal https://gerges2022.livejournal.com/profile

Pocket https://getpocket.com/@646g8dZ0p3aX5Ad1bsTr4d9THjA5p6a5b2fX99zd54g221E4bs76eBdtf6aJw5d0?src=navbar

PUBLICATIONS

box https://app.box.com/s/47fwd0gshir636xt0i3wpso8lvvl8vnv

Academia https://rudn.academia.edu/GergesTawadrous

List of publications http://vixra.org/author/gerges_francis_tawdrous

Slideshare https://www.slideshare.net/Gergesfrancis

#quantum physics #physique #astronomy #астрофизика #квантовая физика #наш физик легенда #astrophysics #физика #physics #астрономи космос наука

2 notes · View notes

shatar-aethelwynn · 2 years ago

Note

Well, the truth is that archaeologists, physicists, biological anthropologists and anthropologists have debunked as Biblically inspired pseudoscience the publication about the alleged destruction of Tall el-Hammam by some kind of "cosmic airbust" that you have invoked. And of course the identification of this site with the Biblical Sodom is totally arbitrary. See for more details https://www.sapiens.org/archaeology/tall-el-hammam/ (When Biblically Inspired Pseudoscience and Clickbait Cause Looting, written by a team of archaeologists working in this area).

Interesting. I’ve read the article you linked and I am not impressed. Half of it is more about criticizing the site lead’s religious beliefs than anything else. It has a clearly pointed agenda: to reveal that there is a clear agenda. How…unoriginal. The authors raise legitimate concerns, however I find their method of doing so is as sensational and biased as they accuse everyone else of being.

If we are to throw out a large amount of research from an archaeological site for no proven reason (and I say proven because at least one of the complaints is an “appears to be” and another is “they mention Sodom too many times”) other than that the people funding it aren’t atheists, and say it’s pseudoscience then I’m sorry, but we’re going to be throwing out a lot of other research as well. Because it is an unfortunate fact of life that you will need to deal with that some people can do science and archaeology and draw sound conclusions without being atheists. And some digs will be funded by people who have religious motivations. They will often be disappointed, but the alternative is no dig. That the research gets pounced upon to “prove” the ideas of less historically minded people does not make the work itself pseudoscience. It’s all pseudoscience if the person using it manipulated the quotes they use well enough.

That there is pushback on the paper does not in any way surprise me. Congratulations, you have demonstrated how science in academia works. Should I be impressed? Next there will be a paper refuting the rebuttals. Followed by a paper calling the refutations into question. Both sides will claim the other has an agenda. As is normal for science. I will simply be sitting here going “cool! More interesting research! Love when that happens! Unfortunate that I can't math!” because I don’t feel any obligation to say “This is actually Sodom”. Or did you not notice that I pointed out that there are now two sites people are pointing to. I wouldn’t be at all surprised if in another 10 years someone else comes along and says, “well actually, they’re both wrong it’s this new site.” My entire opinion on both sites is “People lived there! Wonder what they were like. What did they wear? What did they eat? I wonder what animals they liked.” If eventually indisputable proof that one of them is Sodom is found, great. If eventually indisputable proof is found that neither of them is Sodom, also great. Because either way, careful research has been done, and the Bible will remain what it has been: a collection of historical texts, with all the caveats and problems inherent in such.

Also, even if the air burst theory is satisfactorily disproven there are still questions that must be answered, which your article did not attempt to discuss: how did the people die? What happened to this site? Not an air burst? Disappointing because who doesn't love a giant explosion, but it's fine. So what’s the new theory?

“Instead, ancient peoples of the region likely developed oral histories and stories to explain these “ghost towns” located by the Dead Sea. Those stories then formed the basis for oral traditions that were eventually written down, more than a millennium later, in the Bible.” Congratulations, this is in fact how many people working on archaeological sites in the Levant, and many people learning about these two sites in particular, interpret this data. It is, in fact, fairly close to how I am currently inclined to interpret it, because I do not believe in biblical inerrancy.

“As anthropological archaeologists and critical thinkers, especially about heritage resources, we aren’t interested in equating real sites with mythical biblical cities.” I wonder where they would have fallen on the scale of opinions when the existence of Troy as anything other than a mythical city was an actual question. They are 100% correct that applying names of not-proven-real places to archaeological sites is dangerous and should be avoided. But to demand that no connection be made solely because the connection is to the Bible stinks of as deep a bias as they are accusing Collins (with no small justification, I admit) of. The authors all appear to worthy of respect on academic grounds, and I agree with their concerns over proper method, but not with how they word them.

“Illegally procured artifacts are marketed explicitly to people seeking a tangible connection with the Bible.” True. It’s an ongoing issue. Christians are absolutely a problem with this. It’s also a bit of a tangent from the main topic meant to make people angry and ignore that this is not actually a refutation of the site work. Looting would happen simply because it is an archaeological site. As evidenced by just about every archaeological site everywhere. Why do you think the archaeologists don’t announce their find immediately? It is an especially difficult and ongoing struggle with archaeological sites in the region simply because of where the site is located. The hypothetical connection with Sodom isn’t going to make that any different.

Finally, thank you for bringing this to my attention. I will try to keep an eye out for further research on a new hypothesis of what happened at the site. And if you find one feel free to pass it along. But articles complaining that people with a theological bias shouldn’t be allowed to work on, talk about or make hypotheses about their sites because “bible, eww” is not going to do much more than make me roll my eyes.

4 notes · View notes

wack-ashimself · 2 years ago

Text

'Prove it to me.'

Why? You're a stranger online, who has, in turn, proved nothing to me.

And honestly? Historically? I've spent hours, days, weeks even talking to people who disagreed with me, showing them evidences, hard data, personal accounts, etc, and they just outright dismiss and/or ignore it. So I WASTED my time. They didn't want proof cuz they never were gonna hear/see it. They were just waiting to say you're wrong for a different reason this time.

Let's be real: most people who disagree with you are thickheaded and WILL NOT CHANGE THEIR MINDS.

So why do I owe them, or you, anything?

The only reason I keep debating is for everyone else reading. Anyone on the fence, or wondering if there's an alternative viewpoint.

#debate #arguement

3 notes · View notes

jcmarchi · 1 month ago

Text

Scratchpad Technique: Structured Thinking with AI

New Post has been published on https://thedigitalinsider.com/scratchpad-technique-structured-thinking-with-ai/

Scratchpad Technique: Structured Thinking with AI

The scratchpad technique fundamentally changes how we interact with Large Language Models (LLMs). Unlike traditional prompting where we simply state our request and hope for the best, the scratchpad technique creates a structured thought process that both you and the LLM can follow.

Consider this common scenario: When asking an LLM to analyze customer purchase patterns, a typical prompt might simply request the analysis directly. The result? Often a rushed or misaligned response that misses key considerations. Here’s where the scratchpad technique proves transformative.

Instead of diving straight into the solution, the scratchpad technique introduces a critical planning phase. By using <scratchpad> tags, you create a space where the LLM can:

Map out its approach before execution

Break down complex problems into manageable components

Identify potential pitfalls early

Allow for course correction before investing time in the wrong direction

The real power lies in transparency. When you can see how the LLM plans to tackle your request, you can catch misunderstandings immediately and guide it toward your intended outcome.

Building Your First Scratchpad

The basic structure of a scratchpad prompt consists of three key elements:

The Initial Request: Present your task clearly, but don’t stop there. Include context about your goals and any specific requirements.

The Scratchpad Directive:Direct the LLM to plan its approach using <scratchpad> tags. Be specific about what you want to see in the planning phase.

The Review Loop: Examine the proposed approach and refine as needed before proceeding with the full response.

Let’s walk through a practical example. Rather than simply requesting a market analysis, here’s how you can structure it:

A basic scratchpad response will look something like this:

This planning stage reveals the LLM’s intended focus areas. If you notice it’s missing crucial elements – perhaps battery technology innovation or charging infrastructure partnerships – you can redirect before receiving a complete but off-target analysis.

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

Vague Planning Directives: Don’t just ask the LLM to “plan its approach.” Request specific elements you want to see in the scratchpad, such as methodology, data points, or analytical frameworks.

Skipping the Review Step: The scratchpad isn’t just for show – it’s your opportunity to course-correct. Take time to evaluate if the proposed approach aligns with your needs.

Insufficient Context: While the scratchpad helps organize thinking, it can’t compensate for unclear initial requirements. Be specific about your needs, audience, and intended use of the information.

Beyond the Basics

When tackling LLM projects, crafting the right initial prompt becomes crucial.

Here are some prompt ideas for multi-layered challenges. Remember to include as much context in the form of attached documents or text as possible:

Product Launch Strategy Prompt:

“I need to develop a comprehensive product launch strategy. Using <scratchpad> tags, break down your approach for analyzing market positioning, competitive landscape, and go-to-market planning. Consider potential information gaps and dependencies between these elements before providing any recommendations.”

Budget Planning Prompt:

“Help me create a departmental budget for next year. Before providing numbers, use <scratchpad> tags to outline your methodology for considering historical data, growth projections, and resource allocation. Flag any assumptions you’ll need to make in this process.”

Project Risk Assessment Prompt:

“We’re launching a new enterprise software system. Before listing potential risks, use <scratchpad> tags to map out how you’ll approach risk identification across technical, operational, and business dimensions. Include your framework for prioritizing these risks.”

Each of these prompts:

Clearly states the end goal

Requests specific planning elements

Identifies key areas requiring consideration

Encourages systematic thinking before solution generation

Note: These prompts are fairly simple examples. You can get very detailed and complex depending on the use case.

The key is being explicit about wanting to see the planning process before getting solutions. This prevents rushed responses and ensures thorough consideration of all relevant factors.

As mentioned, these prompts can (and should) be further customized by:

Adding specific industry context

Including known constraints

Specifying required outputs

Mentioning particular methodologies you want to be considered

Remember: The more complex the task, the more important it becomes to see the LLM’s planned approach before it generates solutions.

Advance Your Prompt Engineering Skill Through <scratchpad>

Learn <scratchpad> Prompting →

The scratchpad technique helps us transform the interaction between humans and LLMs. By implementing this structured approach, organizations and professionals can move beyond simple prompt-response patterns to achieve more sophisticated, reliable outcomes. This methodology proves particularly valuable in environments where accuracy, consistency, and transparent reasoning are paramount to decision-making processes.

0 notes

riearchivistfornow · 1 month ago

Text

Jesus – Is He the only way?

Teens Xcite 2014.08.17

Jesus – Is He the only way?

Is Jesus really the only way?

John 14:6 NIV

Jesus answered, “I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me.

Matthew 16:13 NIV

When Jesus came to the region of Caesarea Philippi, he asked his disciples, “Who do people say the Son of Man is?”

The Mordern Versions of Jesus 1) A good man Jesus was a good man be ause he was the Son of God because he came down to earth and into the world.

2) A misunderstood rabbi A very talented Jewish teacher which never meant to start a new religion

3) Revolutionary Jesus "Jesus as the Messiah who came to overthrow the unjust power."

4) The Ecumenical Jesus Ecumenical: anything and everything is okay.

the truth is that all these four views of Jesus is not true.

"If you are believing in a false Christ, If your preach a false Christ you are cursed."

If you hold on to any of these views, you are not safe. Through the wealth of data uncovered by the historical and archelogical research.We are able to measure the accuracy of the Bible. It is thus accurate to the claims of the Bible being true.

Facts:

1. Jesus fulfilled prophecy.

Fakes can't fulfil prophecy. They can't direct the circumstances of their birth and death. Jesus' fulfillment of such prophecies shows that he is no fake. Jesus Christ was the credientialed, expected, authoritative Messiah for whom the world has been taught since the Garden of Eden

2. He made amazing claims about himself

He claimes that he is the Son of God He made claims that he will rise from the dead

3. Supernatural Powers

-turned water into wine -multiplied five loaves and two fishes -raised from the dead The excessive skeptism of many liberal theologians stems not from an evaluation of available data, but from an enormous predisposition against the supernatural.

4. The Empty Tomb

If we do not believe that he rose from the dead, then our preaching is useless and so is our faith.

Proofs: ~The Empty Tomb. First claim is that the desciples stole the body. This is proven wrong because of the two Roman soldiers and then roll away the tomb stone. Also his burial cloth is neatly folded, which did not make sense. Secondly, they went to the wrong tomb stone. If they did that, people would have shown that he is still dead.

~The Holy Women. Women did were of second class and did not hold abilities to claim witnesses.

~Jesus Apostles New Courage The courage that they had to finally come out of hiding because they new the truth.

~The Changed Attitude of James. He became a strong leader from once being a skeptic

~The Five Hundred Witnesses. There were five hundred witnesses there to prove it

~The Conversion of Paul He was persecuting the Church and he had an encounter with Christ, but then became one of the most powerful missionaries

~ They died for Jesus No one would dare to die for a lie

5. Transformed Lives

Everyday there are many people who still are coming to know the Lord Jesus Christ and the rate of people who are knowing the Lord Jesus is accelerating and escalating.

Possibilities: ¤ Jesus is the greatest liar in the human history ¤Jesus is a lunatic ¤Jesus is not a lunatic nor a liar but that Jesus Christ is the Lord

He's a Liar-No He's a lunatic-No He's the Lord-Yes

#ArchivistRie #fcbc.org.sg #2014 #TeensXcite

0 notes

augerer · 7 months ago

Text

sure, people may be wrong about the metrics, but that's probably because the metrics are not reflecting their lived reality.

sorry for not reblogging the posts directly, but i want to address two separate reblog chains by op @centrally-unplanned. in this one, you show this graph:

stating it's the real median income, adjusted for inflation. you are mistaken, you have actually sent an image of the median personal income NOT adjusted for inflation.

this is the actual real median income which has been adjusted for inflation, as you can see it has actually been stagnant. furthermore, looking at real median household income, it's actually been trending downwards since 2019.

(link to median income NOT adjusted for inflation, link to real median income, link to real household median income)

now taking a look at household net worth adjusted for inflation:

it's also completely flat, household net worth has not increased essentially at all from three years ago. this is obviously extremely bad and probably why people do not feel good about the economy despite the stock market numbers.

now for your claim that @3liza is "lying" about the middle class families at their food bank:

[above screenshot is from this same thread]

food banks are factually reporting a greater demand (link) "About 75% of food banks reported seeing an increase in the number of people served in February compared to a year earlier, according to a recent survey from Feeding America, a national network of more than 200 food banks and more than 60,000 partner agencies, food pantries and meal programs." also from the article, "Groceries cost about 33.5% more than they did at the start of the pandemic, according to Datasembly’s Grocery Price Index, which tracks prices in more than 150,000 stores nationwide."

furthermore: “Most of the new folks are working families,” she said. “Many of the jobs aren’t paying enough to take care of expenses and put away a little savings. It now seems that one unexpected expense tips people’s finances.”

but sure, your single graph about the MEDIAN price of eggs, a singular product, between 2022 (where eggs were already at a high price historically) to 2024 proves that there's no way middle class families could be experiencing food insecurity or that egg prices in that specific area couldn't occasionally be $8, and anyone who says otherwise must be lying.

many articles also cite the end of pandemic era food benefits as a cause of increased food bank demand, which brings me to the other reblog thread where you and @tanadrin argue that the reason that americans feel badly about the economy is actually because of the pandemic bailout having raised inflation:

this is starting from the assumption that the pandemic inflation is entirely attributable to the bailout, which is not true. see this article on the supply-side cause of post-pandemic inflation:

"Our paper also highlights the various supply-side issues that dominated inflationary pressures in 2022, especially those in the energy and food sectors. Due to the inherent volatility of fossil fuel prices and the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, energy prices soared to almost two times pre-pandemic levels in June 2022. Market concentration and manipulation in the food market caused prices to increase throughout 2020 and were further fueled by geopolitical disturbances in 2022.

. . . Even as inflationary pressures have decreased, firms have openly boasted of increased profits under cover of inflation."

also notable is: "We also rebut the idea that price increases are due to increased demand as a result of pandemic stimulus. The first problem with this argument is empirical—data on savings show that people did save stimulus money, and personal savings rates remained above pre-pandemic levels until late 2021, well after inflation started to increase." as we probably see this reflected in the wall street journal graphs as well. the part of the wall street journal graph where americans were gaining net worth coincides with the pandemic stimulus effects, and it was after those lapsed that americans saw their net worth eroding. always notable to look at the impacts of the hugely popular and successful child tax credit expansion, which biden let lapse:

i would definitely argue that where biden went wrong is in letting pandemic stimulus lapse while unregulated corporations raised their prices, not in having pandemic stimulus at all.

i don't disagree that americans are incorrect about what e.g. the stock market is reporting, but people are not delusional about what is going on in their own lives economically. american households have not built any inflation adjusted net worth since three years ago, and people can feel that.

55% believe the economy is shrinking, and 56% think the US is experiencing a recession, though the broadest measure of the economy, gross domestic product (GDP), has been growing. 49% believe the S&P 500 stock market index is down for the year, though the index went up about 24% in 2023 and is up more than 12% this year. 49% believe that unemployment is at a 50-year high, though the unemployment rate has been under 4%, a near 50-year low.

My new calling card/mantra: You cannot policy tweak your way around this

#anomaly speaks #sorry everyone got a bit heated about this lol #long post

3K notes · View notes

purple-slate · 1 year ago

Text

Conversational Insights — The Future of Business Intelligence!

The Past Few Years of Business Intelligence

The year is 2002. The CFO of a Fortune 500 company is looking at optimizing his cash flow. Plugging the leak is mission critical, because share prices are plummeting, and shareholders are getting impatient. He’s waiting for that annual spend report to come in. It needs to get through all the red tape because the board wanted a solution yesterday.

And then he gets the news. IT team needs two more days to finish the report because some new “intern” forgot to save the spend analysis dashboard. When the CFO introspects, he understands that he had followed the process to the T.

He submitted the request 5 business days ago as mentioned in the SOP.

He clearly explained the requirement, its objective, business impact, guidelines to follow, and the report format.

He even followed up a couple of times.

So what went wrong? Nothing. The issue was with the entire concept of Traditional Business Intelligence (BI). Traditional business intelligence had many shortcomings but external dependency and complexity to derive insights take the cake. Such events were common in businesses and they sparked the inception of self-service analytics.

The Current Suite of Self-Service Analytical Tools is Selfish

Fast forward to 2022. Self-service analytics have taken precedence over the legacy method of generating business intelligence reports or dashboards. Users are empowered enough to create data visualizations. However, a CFO facing a similar situation still waits for at least 4–5 business days to get that report in hand. The process has become a little bit refined but still, the dependencies exist. Complexities exist. It’s almost as if certain shortcomings in the space of business intelligence are set in stone. The future of business intelligence depends on how we address the following issues.

Difficulty in Information Access

The complexity of operating a self-service tool unfortunately has led to organizations introducing dedicated data analytics teams. This effectively cripples the purpose of self-service by creating dependencies or forcing business leaders to become tech experts.

Increase in Cost

Because a team requires people. Right from the salaries of the members, to footing their bill for additional certifications proves to be a costly affair for the organizations. Factor in the license costs of the tool, and organizations will start paying they hit pay dirt soon with the investments.

Time Loss

Most self-service analytics tools take months and years to master. Even then for a seasoned user to create dashboards and reports, it will take him or her a specific amount of time. For momentary information needs the current suite of self-service tools is not sufficient.

Real-Time Insights is Still a Distant Dream

Most of these tools create insights based on historical data. This implies for every weekly, fortnightly, or monthly meeting needs a fresh set of dashboards or reports to be produced. This will add to the already existing time delay which seriously hinders the decision-making process for business leaders.This is by far the most lengthy problem statement that I’ve given to you - a visionary, a board member, a CXO, a farsighted business leader, and most importantly, my reader.

But I’m a big believer in setting the expectations right and most importantly, making sure you understand the context. Reading through this piece, you would have thought, “That’s me! I go through that daily.” But the solution is right here and of course, nothing is set in stone. Not even the above mentioned issues.

Conversational Insights — The Future of Business Intelligence

Interesting term? And no, this is not analyzing the conversations with the customer to understand their preferences. We are just redefining the term a little bit. Conversational Insights or Conversational BI is using natural language-driven conversations with your data to derive actionable insights. Conversational insights powered by Conversational AI, aim to remove existing complexities in information access by helping you, the data user Talk to Your Data™.

In layman’s terms, ensuring self-service analytics remain truly self-service. This is not a revolutionary ideology that sprung up out of nowhere. It has been in the discussion and works for quite some time now. Celebrated author Nir Eyal discussed this concept way back in 2016 in his blog.

If you ask the question, why conversational insights and more importantly why now, it’s fairly simple. Language is the most seamless and easy-to-use interface for human beings. Imagine involving in a dialogue with your data. You don’t have to click a thousand times and jump between multiple windows to get the information you were seeking. Rather, a simple “What were my sales for 2020 Q4?” should fetch you the relevant results. That’s the power of conversational BI.

Gartner predicts that by 2023, 25 percent of employee interactions with applications will be via voice, up from under 3 percent in 2019.

This change in data analytics can be attributed to three major factors.

Changing Technology Landscape

To explain this point a simple example would be how writing happened — Then vs Now. You write an email. Then you review it at least 3 times and correct it before sharing. The entire exercise takes you a considerable amount of time. Now? AI Tools like Grammarly does it for you and you get an error-free email in less than a minute. Technology has enabled this.

Gravitating Towards Convenience

Technological advancements enabled convenience for humans. Taking a cue from the previous example, we needed to correct our mistakes by typing them. Now, it’s the click of a button. Going forward, I’m sure the entire exercise of typing will be replaced by smart transcription, and Joaquin Phoenix’s movie Her won’t be science fiction anymore. If convenience can exist in a simple exercise like writing an email, why can’t BI tools have it?

Humans Thrive on Momentary Insights

The most important point here. The one that drives the ball home. Humans exhibit definite psychology when they seek information (also read insights). The chronological order starts with one question, then follow-up questions to gain additional insights, and then finally the action element. They do not expect a lot of insights, they just need answers to the momentary data questions they have. In simpler terms, they don’t want their BI tool to beat around the bush.

Conversational Insights Address the Root Cause

Conversational Insights is the remedy for making sure that users are easily able to access data insights that satisfy their momentary questions. The user dependency on other teams is greatly reduced thereby making sure that insights are accessed within the required time frame. Delays in decision-making and their impending effects can be mitigated by investing in conversational insights.

Ease of use: No prior training or technical expertise is required to derive insights. You just need to know how to ask questions to your data. The system makes sure that relevant insights are shown to you in different formats including visualizations.

Multiple input formats: You can converse with your data in multiple formats. You can chat with it using text, voice, or search based on your convenience and preferences.

Omnichannel capabilities: Conversational Insights can make sure insights are delivered to you on the device of your choice in the channel required. Whether it’s collaboration tools like Google Chat, Microsoft Teams, Slack, or Smart Speakers like Alexa.

Insights, anytime: You don’t have to wait around for your data analysts anymore to get that dashboard. You can open your smartphone even in the dead of night and start getting relevant information. In the truest essence, power back to people!

Enhanced Productivity: Across teams, functions, and the organization at large. Majorly because of the timely availability of insights. Every team will overdeliver including the data analytics function as they would be able to concentrate more on their core value-adding tasks.

It’s Going to be a Conversational Insights Driven Decade

The closing notes are pretty simple. The world is increasingly going conversational. Gartner did say that by the end of 2022, 70% of the global workforce will be interacting with conversational platforms daily. The conversational business intelligence function of an organization is also part of this transformation and conversational insights is here to define the future of business intelligence.

This post was originally published in: https://www.purpleslate.com/conversational-insights-the-future-of-business-intelligence/

#business intelligence #conversational bi #future of business intelligence #BI Tools #BI Platform

1 note · View note

razorblade180 · 2 years ago

Text

It’s been written

Scara:*sitting under a tree*

Aether:Yoooo, Scara!

Scara:Ugh, what do want this time? I thought I completed my mandatory training for toda-

Mona:*walks up* Hey.

Scara:…Hello. Aether, who’s your friend?

Aether:Hehehe~

Scara:What?

Mona:*opens coin purse* New I should’ve trusted my gut. *hands Aether mora* I should’ve known he’d try playing stupid.

Scara:Playing? Wait, hold on! Do you-

Mona:Remember you’re a jerk that outwitted? Yes. Do you really think you could really hold power over a genius like myself?

Aether:She did forget.

Mona:*red* But I also put it things back together on my own.

Scara:How the heck did you manage that?

Mona:Simple. People come to me for divinations. It’s often for someone who wants validity of my skill to ask me to tell them something about themselves I wouldn’t know. Recently I’ve been getting them “wrong.”

Scara:Maybe you’re not as good as you think.

Mona:No! They’re incorrect because they’re misremembering! I got concerned about my so called errors and started looking at a variety of stars; only to find certain things of great, significant events in peoples’ lives contradict what my own memory and historical data showed.

Aether:In summary, the stars still tell the truth of a person’s life. I had her look at Kazuha’s constellation and then told her what the word of mouth would be if she were to ask someone. As a way of proving I wasn’t trying to trick her.

Mona:Not that I’d believe you would. After that, he had me look at Fischl’s during the time of the meteor shower where I saw you, a complete stranger I’ve forgotten. Needless to say, I was curious to find out why I couldn’t remember. It took some time but I eventually found your constellation.

Scara:I thought astrologist had strict rules to follow?

Mona:Normally I wouldn’t look a people’s lives randomly for personal gain, but when all my readings and memories are now called into question, dramatically impacting my job as a whole, it’s no longer just personal. It’s my responsibility to figure out what is happening so I can help others properly. *folds arm* So…Balladeer, what an interesting time you’ve been having.

Scara:Hmph, don’t call me that. So it’s not as if you’ve truly regained the memories, but you fond what was hidden. I’ll admit, maybe the stars have their merit after all.

Mona:Regained or not, witnessing the memories has certainly ticked me off. To think you’d try something so arrogant, I’m not letting you off the hook. I’ll be keeping a close eye on you.

Scara:To think you’d miss me so badly. If you want dinner then just say so.

Mona:I can’t believe I spent time remembering you. You’ll need a full course meal and then some before I let any of this go!

Scara:…Fine. Don’t go blabbing about your grand revelation though.

Mona:As if most people would believe me. I’m begrudgingly silent for various reasons. I’ll live with the satisfaction that despite your work, not only couldn’t you have escaped Aether, but my knowledge as well.

Aether:Congratulations. You’re stuck with us.

Scara:….

Scara:There’s worse fates I suppose.

#genshin impact #mona magistus #gi aether #scaramouche #scaramona #scaraether

133 notes · View notes

beatrice-otter · 1 year ago

Note

I hope I am not overstepping when I add a few notes from a Christian perspective.

There are Christians who hear this and think "but if it's not factual history, then it's a lie! and it can't be a lie, so therefore we have to throw out all our historical and archaeological knowledge!" And that's just wrong.

Let me put it this way. Jesus taught in parables in order to teach. There was never a Prodigal Son, this was a story that Jesus made up in order to teach a lesson. Does that make the story a lie? No! It does not! It has a lot to teach us! The factual basis (or lack thereof) has nothing to do with whether or not it's important, nothing to do with whether or not God is trying to teach us something through that story.

The Bible is not and never has been a history textbook, or a science textbook, or even a religion textbook. If you try to make it one, you will miss the point.

To add to what fdelopera was saying, we have really really good archaeological data for the Ancient Near East, better than for anywhere else in the world. Why? Because lots of people (mostly Christians from Europe and America) have poured a lot of time and resources into archaeological digs in the "Holy Land" to prove a factual, literal basis for Biblical stories. And what we have found with all of that work is that the story of the Exodus simply cannot have happened the way it is narrated. It can't! (Neither can the major stories of Genesis.)

First, if any tribal group fled Egypt at that point, they were really small. The numbers given in the book Christians call Exodus are absurd. It would have amounted to about half of Egypt's total population, there is no way even a fraction of that number could have left without there being evidence in the archaeological record. There is no point in time anywhere near the best estimates for when it would have happened where you see groups of homes all being abandoned at roughly the same time. That just didn't happen.

Second, if any tribal group entered Canaan at that point, they were really small, because again, there is no archaeological record of any group coming in except the Peleset/Philistines. Different groups from different have different material culture--they eat different foods, they build different houses, they decorate their pottery differently, etc., etc. When a new ethnic group of any size moves into an area, you can tell from the archaeological record because the material culture changes. And ... there just isn't any sign of that in any time period when the Exodus might have been. (There's also no sign of the massive warfare the Bible records at that point, just the regular level of violence between different cities and tribal groups.)

I personally think there's a decent chance that there was a small group of refugees who then assimilated into the larger Canaanite community, and their story was adopted by the larger community as part of the stories of the community, and then influenced by all the factors that fdelopera names. But if so, they were a very small group numerically, and the story changed a lot over the years and was melded into a bunch of other stories from people who hadn't ever been refugees from Egypt.

A note on writing: while Egypt had hieroglyphs quite early, there was no writing system in Canaan until quite late, about 1,000 BCE. By that point, there was already two kingdoms, Israel and Judah, in existence. Everything before that was transmitted orally as stories, and while it is possible for a culture to transmit oral records quite precisely over tens of thousands of years (the aboriginal peoples of Australia did it), it has to be part of a concerted effort to preserve things absolutely unchanged. Most peoples--including the Semitic peoples of Canaan and its surrounding areas--did not put that much work into it. Even sacred stories that were written down fairly close to the time they happened were often edited later to fit into the narratives the Biblical editors were trying to tell. And early writing in Canaan/Israel/Judah/Philistia tends mostly to fall into two categories: political stuff (monuments with inscriptions about glorious battles, etc.) and economic stuff (records of business transactions). Very little of it is religious in nature. Those stories were transmitted orally even long after they had writing.

Hi curious anon here. You mentioned in one of your posts (I think the sennek one? If I’m spelling it right) that the exodus from Egypt was metaphorical as the enslavement in Egypt didn’t happen, but I thought it did? Can you explain? (If you’re happy to of course)

Hi Anon! Thanks for your question. My response is looong lol (you got me going about a special interest), so buckle up!

Sooo I’m going to make a few guesses here, based on the way you’ve phrased your question. Judging from the fact that you’ve written Sukkot as “sennek” (I've looked through recent posts, and I think this is the post you're referring to), I’m going to guess that you’re not Jewish.

And judging from the fact that you think that Shemot, or “Names” (commonly written in Christian bibles as Exodus), is a literal historical account of Jewish history, I’m guessing that you have a Christian background.

You’re not alone in this. And I’m not saying this to pick on you. Many Christians have a literalist interpretation of the Bible, and most have zero knowledge of Jewish history (aside from maybe knowing some facts about the Holocaust). And so, what knowledge of Jewish history you have mostly comes from the Tanakh (what you call the Old Testament).

Tanakh is an acronym. It stands for Torah (the Five Books of Moses), Nevi’im (Prophets), Ketuvim (Writings). Also, the Tanakh and the “Old Testament” are not the same. The Tanakh has its own internal organization that makes sense for Jewish practice. The various Christian movements took the Tanakh, cut it up, reordered it, and then often mistranslated it as a way to justify the persecution of various groups of people — I’m looking at you, King James Bible.

But back to Shemot, the “Exodus” story. The story of Moshe leading the Israelites out of Egypt is more of a Canaanite cultural memory of the Late Bronze Age Collapse between around 1200 – 1150 BCE, which was preserved in oral history and passed down through the ages until it was written down in the form that we know it in the 6th century BCE by Jewish leaders from the Southern Kingdom of Judah.

Since the text is influenced by Babylonian culture and mythology, just as Bereshit is (which you know as Genesis), it is likely that some of the writing and editing of Shemot took place during and after the Babylonian exile in the 500s BCE.

Now, I’m guessing that what I’ve just written in these two paragraphs above sounds very strange to you.

Wait, you might say, didn’t the Israelites conquer the land of Canaan?

Wasn’t the "Exodus" written by Moses’s own hand during the 13th century BCE?

And wasn’t the Pharaoh in the Exodus Ramesses II (aka Ramesses the Great), who ruled in the 13th century BCE?

Actually, no. None of that happened.

The Israelites didn’t conquer Canaan. The Israelites were the same people as the Canaanites, and these are the same peoples as who later became the Jews, as I will explain. The Semitic peoples who would become the Jewish people have been in this area of the Levant since the Bronze Age.

Moshe was not a historical figure and did not write the Torah.

The “Pharaoh” in Exodus is not any specific Egyptian ruler (Ramesses the Great as the “Pharaoh” is mostly a pop culture theory from the 20th century).

Okay, now that I’ve said all that, let’s dive in.

The first ever mention of Israel was inscribed in the Merneptah Stele, somewhere between 1213 to 1203 BCE. Pharaoh Merneptah, who was the Pharaoh after Ramesses the Great, describes a campaign in Canaan to subdue a people called Israel. But there is no mention of plagues or an exodus because those things didn’t happen. The Canaanites were not slaves in Egypt. Canaan was a vassal state of Egypt.

In fact, the events that occurred during the reign of a later Pharaoh, Ramesses III, relate more to Jewish history. Ramesses III won a pyrrhic victory over the Peleset and other “Sea Peoples” who came to Egypt fighting for resources during a time of famine, earthquakes, and extreme societal turmoil. And Ramesses III would witness the beginning of the end of the Bronze Age.

The Canaanites, who were a Semitic people in the Levant, gradually evolved into the people who would become the Northern Kingdom of Israel and the Southern Kingdom of Judah (i.e., Jewish people), but during the 13th Century BCE, they were Canaanites, not Jews.

The Canaanites were polytheistic, worshiping a complex pantheon of gods; they didn’t follow the later Jewish dietary laws (i.e., they ate pork); and their religious practice bore little to no resemblance to the Jewish people of the Second Temple Period.

So, to reiterate, the people in Canaan who called themselves Israel during the Bronze Age were a Semitic people, but they were not recognizably Jewish, at least not to us Jews today. Canaan was a vassal state of Egypt, just as Ugarit and the Hittite Empire were.

Canaan was part of the vast trading alliance that allowed the Bronze Age to produce the metal that historians have named it for: bronze.

Bronze is a mixture of copper and tin (about 90% copper and 10% tin), and in order to make it, the kingdoms of the Bronze Age had to coordinate the mining, transportation, and smelting of these metals from all over the known world. This trading network allowed for the exchange of all sorts of goods, from grain to textiles to gold. Canaan was just one of these trading partners.

Well, between 1200 BCE and 1150 BCE, this entire trading alliance that allowed Bronze Age society to function went (pardon the expression) completely tits up. This is likely due to a large array of events, including famine and earthquakes, which led to an overall societal disarray.

Some of the people who were hardest hit by the famine, people from Sardinia and Sicily to Mycenae and Crete, came together in a loose organization of peoples, looking for greener pastures. These were all peoples who were known to Egypt, and many of them had either served Egypt directly or had traded with Egypt during better days. According to ancient records, this loose grouping of peoples would arrive at various cities, consume resources there, and then leave for the next city (sacking the city in the process).

Just to be clear, these people were just as much the victims of famine as the cities they sacked. There were no “good guys” or “bad guys” in this equation, just people trying as best as they could to survive in a world that was going to shit.

Well, these “Sea Peoples” (as they were much later dubbed in the 19th century CE) eventually made their way to Egypt, but Ramesses III defeated them in battle around 1175 BCE. He had the battle immortalized on his mortuary temple at Medinet Habu.

We don’t know much about these Sea Peoples, but we do know what the Egyptians called them. And from those names, we can figure out some of their origins. Peoples such as the Ekwesh and the Denyen. These were likely the Achaeans and the Danaans.

If you’re familiar with Homer’s Iliad, you’ll recognize these as some of the names that Homer gives to the Greek tribes. Many of the Sea Peoples were from city states that are now part of Greece and Italy.

Yes, the Late Bronze Age Collapse of the 12th Century BCE didn’t just get handed down as a cultural memory of the “Exodus” to the people who would centuries later become the Jews. That cataclysm also inspired the stories that “Homer” would later canonize as the Trojan War in the Iliad and the Odyssey. The Exodus and the Trojan War are both ancient cultural memories of the same societal collapse.

And neither the Trojan War nor the Exodus are factual. However, despite having little to no historicity, they both capture a similar feeling of the world being turned upside down.

Well, back to the Sea Peoples. Remember the Peleset that I mentioned a few paragraphs ago? They were one of these “Sea Peoples” that Ramesses III defeated. They were likely Mycenaean in origin, and possibly originated from Crete. After Ramesses III defeated them, he needed a place to relocate them along with several other tribes, including the Denyen and Tjeker. It was a “you don’t have to go home, but you can’t stay here” situation.

So, Egypt rounded up the surviving Peleset and sent them north to settle — to the land of Canaan.

Now, if you have some Biblical background, let me ask you this. What does “Peleset” sound like? What if we start it with an aspirated consonant, more of a “Ph” instead of a “P”?

That’s right. The Peleset settled in Canaan and became the Philistines.

This is where the real story of the people who would become the Jews begins.

As the Mycenaean (aka Greek) Peleset settled in their new home, they clashed with the Semitic Israelite people of Canaan. Some of these Canaanites fought back. These Canaanites also organized themselves into different groups, or “tribes.” (See where this is going?) Some of these tribes were in the Northern area of Canaan, and some were in the South, but there was a delineation between North and South — aka they did not start out as one people and then split in two. They started as two separate groups.

If you’re following me so far, you’ll know that I’m now talking about what would in time become the Northern Kingdom of Israel and the Southern Kingdom of Judah.

Well, backtracking a bit. The Bronze Age was ending, and the Iron Age was about to begin. The Peleset/Philistines were experts at smelting iron, which was harder to work with than bronze due to it having a much higher smelting temperature. When the Peleset settled in Canaan, they brought this iron smelting knowledge with them, and they used it to make weapons to subdue the local Canaanite peoples. The Canaanites therefore had to fight back “with sticks and stones.”

Hmm. Does that sound familiar? Who is one of the most famous Philistines you can think of from the Tanakh (the Old Testament)? I’ll give you a guess. It’s in the Book of Samuel (in the Tanakh, that’s in the Nevi’im — The Prophets).

That’s right. Goliath.

The story of “David and Goliath” is likely a Jewish cultural memory that was transmitted orally from the time of the Canaanite struggles against the Peleset.

The man who would become King David used a well-slinged stone to fell the much greater Goliath, and then he used Goliath’s own iron sword to cut off Goliath’s head.

In this metaphor, we can see the struggle between the Canaanite tribes and the Peleset, as the Canaanites fought to hold off the Peleset’s greater military might.

Historically, the Peleset eventually intermarried with the Canaanites, and within several generations, they were all one people. Likewise, the Mycenaean Denyen tribe may have settled in the Northern Kingdom of Israel, intermarried with the Canaanites, and become the Tribe of Dan.

The Book of Samuel, containing the story of David and Goliath, was written down in the form we would recognize today in the 500s BCE during the Babylonian Exile. It is a cultural memory of the time that the Canaanites were unable to wield iron weapons against a much more technologically advanced society, and it would have resonated with the Jews held captive in Babylon.

And with this mention of the Babylonian Exile, I come to the question that remains. And I think the question that you are asking. Where did the story of Shemot, the “Exodus,” the “Going Out,” come from?

And more importantly, why was that story so important to canonize in the Torah — the Jewish people’s “Instruction”?

The Shemot was likely written down and edited in a form that we would recognize today during and after the Babylonian Exile.

So, what was the Babylonian Exile? And what was its impact on Judaism?

To answer that, I need to start this part of the story about 130 years before the Babylonian Exile, in around 730 BCE. We’re now about 450 years after the Late Bronze Age Collapse, when the Canaanites were fighting the Peleset tribe.

Between about 730 and 720 BCE, the Neo-Assyrian Empire conquered the Northern Kingdom of Israel.

Now, you may know this as the time when the “Ten Tribes of Israel were lost.”

In reality, the Assyrians didn’t capture the entire population of Israel. They did capture the Israelite elite and force them to relocate to Mesopotamia, but there were many people from the Israelite tribes left behind. The Ten Tribes were never “lost” because many of the remaining people in the Northern Kingdom migrated south to the Kingdom of Judah.

One such group of people from the Northern Kingdom of Israel maintained their distinct identity and still exist today: the Samaritans. These are the people who today are the Samaritan Israelites. They have their own Torah and their own Temple on Mount Gerizim, where they continue the tradition of animal sacrifice, as the Jews did in Jerusalem before the Romans destroyed the Second Temple in 70 CE. The Samaritans keep the Sabbath, they observe Kashrut laws (i.e., they keep kosher), and they hold sacrifices on Yom Kippur and Pesach. In short, they have maintained religious practices that are similar to Judaism during the Second Temple period.

This mass migration into the Kingdom of Judah in the late 700s and early 600s BCE is where Judaism as we know it today really started to take shape.

At that time, the people of the Northern Kingdom of Israel were polytheistic. They ate pork. They did many of the things that the writers of the Torah tell the Jews not to do.

This is where many of these commandments began, when the priests of Judah needed to define what it was to be a Jew (a member of the Tribe of Judah), in the face of this mass migration from the Kingdom of Israel.

You see, the Ancient Jews didn’t know about germ theory or recognize that trichinosis was caused by eating undercooked pork. That’s not why pigs are treyf. Pigs are treyf because eating pork began as a societal taboo. In short, pigs take a lot of resources to care for, and they eat people food, not grass (i.e. they don’t chew a cud). So if you kept pigs, you would be taking away resources from other people. When you are living in a precarious society that is constantly being raided and conquered by outsiders, you have to make sure that your people are fed, and if you’re competing with a particular livestock over food, that livestock has to be outlawed.

This time period is also likely when the Kingdom of Judah started to practice monolatry (worshiping one God without explicitly denying the existence of other Gods). The people of Judah worshiped YHWH (Adonai) as their God, and the Northern Kingdom of Israel worshiped El as the head of their polytheistic pantheon. The Jews put both of them together as the same G-d. That is why the Bereshit (Genesis) begins:

When Elohim (G-d) began to shape heaven and earth, and the earth then was welter and waste, and darkness over Tehom (the Deep), and the breath of Elohim (G-d) hovering over the waters

NOTE: This is a modification to Robert Alter’s translation of the first two lines of Bereshit (Genesis) in the Tanakh. In a few paragraphs, I will explain the modification I’ve made of transliterating the Hebrew word “Tehom,” instead of (mis)translating this word as “the Deep” as in nearly every translation of Genesis.

Then over the next two hundred years, monolatry would gradually become monotheism. One of the Northern Kingdom’s gods, Baal, was especially popular, so the Judean leadership had to expressly forbid the worship of this god during the writing of the Tanakh.

The message was clear: If we’re going to be one people, we need to worship one G-d. And the importance of the Babylonian Exile cannot be overstated in this shift from monolatry to monotheism. The period during and after the Babylonian Exile is when most of the Tanakh was edited into a form that we would recognize today.

So, I come back to the question, what was the Babylonian Exile? It began, as many wars do, as a conflict over monetary tribute.

Around 598 BCE, the Judean King Jehoiakim refused to continue paying tribute to the Babylonian King Nebuchadnezzar II. And so in around 597 BCE, Nebuchadnezzar II’s troops besieged Jerusalem, killed King Jehoiakim, and captured much of the Judean leadership, holding them captive in Babylon. Over the next ten years, Nebuchadnezzar II continued his siege of Jerusalem, and in 587, he destroyed the First Temple, looted it for its treasures, and took more of the Jews captive. The deportation of the Jewish people to Babylon continued throughout the 580s BCE.

So, by the 570s BCE, the majority of the Jews were captives in a strange land. They were second-class citizens with few rights. The Jews feared that their people would start to assimilate into Babylonian society, intermarry so that they could secure greater freedom for their descendants, and then ultimately disappear as a unique people.

The Jewish leadership knew that this assimilation would begin by the Jews worshiping Babylonian gods.

So the Jewish leadership had a brilliant idea. They said, “We are not in danger of our people drifting into polytheism, assimilation, and cultural death, because we declare that the Babylonian gods do not exist. There is only one G-d, Adonai.”

Now we have left monolatry, and we are fully in monotheism.

And so, the Jews in captivity took Babylonian stories that their children heard around them, and they made these stories Jewish.

That is why the opening lines of Genesis sound so much like the opening lines of the Babylonian creation story, the Enuma Elish.

And remember when I mentioned that I had transliterated “Tehom” in the first two lines of Bereshit (Genesis) above, instead of using the standard translation of “the Deep”? That is because Tehom is a Hebrew cognate for the Babylonian sea goddess Tiamat, who the Babylonian god Marduk defeated and used to shape the heavens and the earth, just as Elohim shaped the heavens and the earth.

When you read the Enuma Elish, you can see the parallels to Genesis:

When the heavens above did not exist, And earth beneath had not come into being — There was Apsû, the first in order, their begetter, And demiurge Tiamat, who gave birth to them all; They had mingled their waters together Before meadow-land had coalesced and reed-bed was to be found — When not one of the gods had been formed Or had come into being, when no destinies had been decreed, The gods were created within them

That is also why the flood story of Noah and the Ark sounds so much like the flood story from the Epic of Gilgamesh.

That is why the story of Moshe’s mother saving him by placing him in a basket on the Nile River parallels the story of King Sargon of Akkad’s mother saving him by placing him in a basket on the Euphrates River.

In order to survive as a people, the Jews consolidated all gods into one G-d. Adonai. Shema Yisrael Adonai eloheinu Adonai ehad. "Hear O Israel, the Lord is our God, the Lord is One."

The Jews said, yes, we acknowledge that we are hearing these polytheistic Babylonian stories in our captivity, but we will make them our own so that we can continue to exist as a people.

But back to your question. What about the story told in Shemot, the “Exodus” from the Land of Egypt?

I think by now you can see the parallels between the Jewish people held as captives in Babylon and the story that they told, of the Israelites held as slaves in Egypt.

And so, the Exodus story, which had been told and retold in various ways as a means to process the cataclysmic trauma of the Late Bronze Age Collapse (similar to the oral retellings of the Trojan War epic before they were written down by “Homer”), now took on a new meaning.

The Exodus story now represented the Jewish people’s hope for escape from Babylon. It represented the Jewish people’s desire to rebuild the Temple in Jerusalem that Nebuchadnezzar II had destroyed. It represented the acceptance that it would take at least a generation before the Jews would be able to return to Jerusalem.

And it represented a cautionary tale about leaders who become too powerful, no matter how beloved they may be.

At a Torah study this Sukkot, the Rabbi discussed why the writers of Devarim (Deuteronomy) said that Moshe couldn’t enter Canaan, even though he'd led the Israelites out of Egypt (which, again, didn't literally happen). And one interpretation is because the Jewish leaders were writing and editing the Exodus during and shortly after the Babylonian Exile, and after seeing the Kingdom of Judah fall because of bad leadership. And they were saying, “It doesn't matter how beloved a leader is. If they start becoming a demagogue, and start behaving as someone who is drunk on their own power, you can't trust them as a leader. And you need to find new leadership.” And damn if that isn't a lesson that we could all stand to learn from!

So, was the Exodus story historically true? No. But does it matter that the Exodus story isn’t historically true? No, it does not. It was and is and will continue to be deeply meaningful to the Jewish people. The Shemot, the Exodus, the breaking of chains, the escape from the “Pharaohs” that enslave us — these are still deeply meaningful to us as Jews.

Was Moshe a historical figure? No, he was not. Is he one of the most fascinating, inspiring, and deeply human figures in Jewish tradition, and in literature in general? Yes, he is. Moshe was an emergent leader, an everyman, a stutterer, and yet he was chosen to lead and speak for his people. He was chosen to write the Torah, the “Instruction,” that has guided us for thousands of years. It doesn't matter that he was not a historical person. What matters is what he stands for. He is the one who directed us in what it is to be Jewish.

Now, fast forward to 538 BCE, around 60 years after the Jews were first taken as captives to Babylon. The Jewish people’s prayers were answered when Persian King Cyrus the Great defeated Babylon in battle, and allowed the Jews to return to Jerusalem, where they began construction on the Second Temple, which was completed around 515 BCE.

The Persian Zoroastrians were henotheistic (they worshiped one God, Ahura Mazda, but they recognized other gods as well). They also had a chief adversarial deity, Angra Mainyu, who was in direct opposition to Ahura Mazda.

Just as the Jews had incorporated Babylonian stories into their texts as a way to preserve their identity as a Jewish people, the Jews now incorporated this idea of “good versus evil” (i.e., It’s better to assimilate the foreign god to us, than to assimilate us to the foreign god).

This shift can be seen in the later story of the Book of Job, which is in the Ketuvim (Writings). Jews have no devil and no hell. There is no “eternal afterlife damnation," and there is no “original sin.” Jews believe in living a good life, right here on earth, and being buried in Jewish soil. Some Jews believe that we go to Sheol when we die, which is a shadowy place of peaceful rest, similar to the Greek realm of Hades. In the Book of Job, the Hebrew word “hassatan” (which Christians transliterate as “Satan”) is just a lawyerly adversary, like a “devil’s advocate” who debates for the other side of the argument. It’s certainly not anything akin to a Christian “devil.”

However, throughout the Second Temple period, various apocalyptic Jewish sects would arise in response to Greek and then Roman persecution, inspired by the Zoroastrian idea of a battle between “the light and the dark.”

In the 1st and 2nd centuries CE, this would lead to a search for the Moshiach: a human leader (not divine) who was descended from the line of King David, and who would restore Jerusalem. And that would not culminate in Jesus (Jews don’t recognize Jesus as Moshiach — for us, he's a really cool dude who said some very profound things, but he's not That Guy).

Rather, the search for Moshiach would stem from the events leading up to the Jewish War, which concluded in 70 CE with the Romans destroying the Second Temple and sacking Jerusalem, and it would culminate in the Bar Kochba revolt between 132 and 135 CE. The Bar Kochba revolt resulted in a Roman campaign of systematic Jewish slaughter and “ethnic cleansing” that nearly destroyed the Jewish people a second time. But that’s a story for another day!

In closing, I encourage you to learn more about Jewish history. And don’t just learn about us from the Holocaust, our darkest hour. Learn about our full history. I highly recommend Sam Aronow’s excellent series on YouTube, which is an ongoing Jewish history project. The YouTube channel Useful Charts also provides excellent overviews of Jewish history.

106 notes · View notes

itsgerges · 2 years ago

Photo

Best Greetings

What's The Nature Of The Sun?

I claim– The Sun Rays Is Created By The Planets Motions Energies Total

The sun is Not doing nuclear fusion to produce its rays – instead- the planets motions energies total be used as the source of the sun rays.

Can This Theory Be A Fact?

I use the planets data – means- the analysis of the planets data lead to this result

Here we have 3 problems

(First problem)

How Is The Planet Data Created? the physics book answers (by random process, initial conditions and historical unknown factors)

Shortly,

No geometrical reason be found behind the planet data definition- also- No design by which the solar system be created or moving – no map for the distances –

Nothing at all

We have 9 separated rocks flying in the space and by the sun gravity they revolve around the sun- this is the solar system vision by the book description

I through a rock into the stagnant water

The planets data is defined by exact equations and can be concluded theoretically

Means- planet diameter, mass, orbital distance, period, velocity …..etc and all data be defined based on exact equations

I have five equations by which the planets data can be concluded theoretically – the book is wrong (the data is defined based on exact equations)

(Second problem)

Can Particle Own Data Be Changed By Relative Motion?

Lorentz transformation is the poof for this fact – but – the books fight against it

I don't know how to find the fact –

The particle length is contracted, its mass is increased and its time is dilated as a result for high velocity motion and the empirical proves prove this fact and the books tell these empirical proves are illusion of measurements

How can the books know that?

When in physics the empirical proves be disproved by theoretical ideas?

Suppose I entered a lab and found the machine and not found any one else – what are the results I will have by that? the machine will show the contraction of length, increasing of mass and dilation of time – but – the physicist isn't found to tell us his secret that the empirical proves are illusions of measurement!

Do you see this situation – I will leave this lab while I believe Lorentz transformation measure facts while it measure illusions (according to the physicist belief)

Someone puts a signboard on the lab door with a question

(why is the physics the science of measurements? How does need empirical proves?)

(Third problem)

When I want to buy one sandwich for lunch– someone told me, you need a back loan!

I do a simple Job- because – I arrange the planets data and this arrangement shows clearly that the sun data depends directly on the planets data and the sun is created by measurements of the planets data –

Simply I concluded the sun is created based on the planets motions energies

But- the fighting is around –If A Light Beam Can Be Produced By A Relative Motion

Here – what proof can I write?

I have the planets data which I can arrange and prove that the sun CAN'T be created far from the planets –on the contrary- the sun all data depends directly on the planets data-now the question is (Can The Data Prove This Fact?)

The physicist mind is filled by the idea (NO light beam can be created by a relative motion) –So whatsoever data I provide - nothing works

By the way

In one discussion they wrote this intelligent idea (Lorentz transformation is wrong because light velocity is a general velocity but particle velocity is a local one and the local can't be used in the same equation with the general)

Some intelligent person had written this splendid idea- and simply – kicked of all empirical proves by Lorentz experiments and all theoretical basics for the relativity theory and even Michelson and Morrely experiment results

A sentence killed the works of people for years – and removed hundreds of empirical proves – I don't know if there's any chairman for the physics company to whom we may ask about these wonders around.

Notice

I want to write the planets data which proves clearly the sun is created by the planets motions –

But – when I write them- the youth of big bang theory will remove all data under the idea (the data is created by random process, initial conditions and historical unknown factors) –I put my five equations to prove that the planets data is created based on exact equations and can be concluded theoretically – but – the big bang youth are disappeared now and will be appeared in another place saying their lies

Shortly- I will put one data as example

I hope someone will see the beauty of geometry

Example

4900 million km = 1.392 million km x 3475 km = 10921 km x 449197 km = 12756 km x 384000 km = 12104 km x 406000 km = 2 x 6792 x 363000

Where

4900 million km = Jupiter orbital circumference

1.392 million km = The Sun Diameter

3475 km = the Earth moon diameter

10921 km = the Earth moon Circumference

449197 km = Jupiter Circumference

12756 km = Earth Diameter

12104 km = Venus Diameter

6792 km = Mars Diameter

406000 km= The Moon Orbital Apogee Radius

384000 km= The Moon Orbital Distance

363000 km= The Moon Orbital Perigee Radius

Simply the data shows one design is behind all of them and the sun diameter is one player in this design – the solar system in one building created based on one design and the sun is a part geometrically in this building

This result can't be produced by the sun gravity – because the sun own data depends on the planets own data – NOT means – the planets data is created depending on the sun- on the contrary – the sun data is created Clearly depend on the planets data

If we accept particle own data be changed by high velocity motion – my hypothesis may explain how the sun rays be created by the planets motions energies

MY HYPOTHESIS

The hypothesis – tells –

The creature brain causes the creature to see any velocity =300000 km/s as (Matter) and any velocity = Zero as (light beam)

By that

I make the light and matter 2 faces for the one coin – and the vision depends on the relative motion-

By that the velocity (300000 km/s) is a limit velocity for the creature ability – means- the creature can't realize any higher velocity even if found –

The limit here isn't limit for the universe but the creature abilities – because any velocity (300000 km/s) or higher will be seen as matter by the creature.

Notice

That tells the matter data can be changed by motion with a velocity 300000 km/s and that explains Lorentz transformation where the particle own data is changed under motion by speed of light (300000 km/s)

Thanks a lot for your kind interest and help

Speed Of Light Has An Effect On Matter Creation Process

https://www.academia.edu/s/053a0a794e

https://www.academia.edu/98508585/Speed_Of_Light_Has_An_Effect_On_Matter_Creation_Process

https://app.box.com/s/tpl1shsi2m28dqo6rq6x6j7ncid0zl4g

https://app.box.com/s/x52am353v74fwieeodg4a73yv9c31l2r

Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292

Physics Department- Physics & Mathematics Faculty

Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow (2010-2013)

Curriculum Vitae https://www.academia.edu/s/b88b0ecb7c

E-mail [email protected], [email protected]

[email protected]

ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147

Facebook https://www.facebook.com/gergis.tawadrous

VK https://vk.com/id696655587

Tumblr https://www.tumblr.com/blog/itsgerges

Researcherid https://publons.com/researcher/3510834/gerges-tawadrous/

Google https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=2Y4ZdTUAAAAJ&hl=en

Livejournal https://gerges2022.livejournal.com/profile

Pocket https://getpocket.com/@646g8dZ0p3aX5Ad1bsTr4d9THjA5p6a5b2fX99zd54g221E4bs76eBdtf6aJw5d0?src=navbar

PUBLICATIONS

box https://app.box.com/s/47fwd0gshir636xt0i3wpso8lvvl8vnv

Academia https://rudn.academia.edu/GergesTawadrous

List of publications http://vixra.org/author/gerges_francis_tawdrous

Slideshare https://www.slideshare.net/Gergesfrancis

3 notes · View notes

sugar-petals · 3 years ago

Text

✏︎ a full guide to ▹Taemin

› i decided to compile some material to check out and enjoy if you want to get into his work. or, for some nostalgia if you’re already a shawol 👋

↳ INCLUDES:

basic info

iconic MVs

famous stages

hot af fancams

other important appearances

reaction cams

meme segment

a sweet bonus (spoiler: taemin has a cute cat)

□ start and browse wherever and however you like, and how much you like, there’s no wrong way to read this 👍

///

1. A VERY PRINCELY PROFILE FIRST

- CLASSIC DATA

full name: Lee Francesco Tae Min (이 프란체스코 태민) — hanja: 泰 tai 民 min (meaning: “great people”), Francesco = baptismal name

occupation: singer-songwriter, dancer, actor, cat dad

born in: seoul

age: 28

d.o.b: 18th July 1993 — yes he’s a cancer 🦀

education: music & film major

- CAREER

trained since: 2005 (!)

groups: SHINee + SuperM

SHINee position: main dancer, sub (now lead) vocalist, brat maknae SuperM position: main dancer, T-poser, main vocalist, center

debut: 2008 (SHINee) + 2014 (solo) + 2019 (SuperM). watch out, the man debuts every 5 years! now seriously: this is a historical record in kpop, taemin debuted in 3 generations.

company: SM Ent

fandom name (group activity): shawols ♥︎ — abbreviated from “SHINee world“

fandom name (solo activities): taemints — invented after he handed out mint sweets to noona fans: now ye know

solo albums: “ACE” (2014), “Press It” (2016), “Sayonara Hitori” (2016), “Flame of Love” (2017), “Move” (2017), “Never Gonna Dance Again: Act 1” (2020), “Advice” (2021).

- ADDITIONAL INFO

voice type: tenor // 3 octave+ range, specialty: mixed register

hobbies: dance, music & the piano 😍

languages: korean, japanese (advanced, can converse on japanese talk shows), english (currently learning)

bestie: exo’s kai

military: enlisted May 31, 2021 - discharge October 31, 2022 (was drafted into the army band, it’s so fitting)

ideal type: “I like someone who is consistent and true. I don’t like it when they hide their true selves and later reveal the true them.”

signature emoji: 6v6

insta: Im____ltm

2. iconic music videos

time and again, taemin’s ideas find their shape and sound as beyond-creative pieces. since he’s around since ‘05, the professionalism is superb. despite being active for so long, he’s still several camp lightyears ahead with what he’s putting out and stuns as always. taemin remains a paragon of self-improvement, dance, imagination, and novelty. since he plays the piano for 15 years now, the musicality really shows.

⚠️ heads up. taemin (being taemin) has made it a tradition and signature style of doing borderline R-rated concepts. he often releases in japan where more NSFW liberty is possible. hence, 18+ ahead.

move (2017) — a must-know internet breaker. the tantalizingly slow dance and glamorous images of taemin in the rain were all around the world. move is taemin’s most impactful contender. it’s so requested that he performed it everywhere, from seoul fashion week to comedy clubs.

criminal (2020) — fancy a visual firework and guidebook of modern creepypasta? a glimpse into taemin’s mind reflecting themes of total surrender? he got you covered. the tied wrist dance and ‘destroy me more’ (’더 망쳐줘 - deo mangcheojweo’) tagline leading into a dramatic final chorus gathered serious infamity.

famous (2019) — the most fabulous kpop song ever made, even the chorus says so. a sassy japanese release that indeed got famous for the notorious bondage scenes and the ‘shaky elbow’ dance. taemin singing to you how sexy he is while serving visuals deluxe to prove it = the best way to invest your time. the retro bass and drums in these, my god.

want (2019) — so catchy, so aesthetic. black snakes gliding all over taemin’s suit (tw, it’s not CGI) and him reiterating ‘hot, hot’ in the chorus: what more do you ‘want’ indeed? 80% of his songs are seductive, but this one knocks it out of the park with the lyrics and racy adlibs.

advice (2021) — a masterclass in head voice and taemin being a gnc legend. dropped before he enlisted. a tale on haters, gossip, and him taking his own advice. if you want to see taemin reprising his viral long hair, crop top fashion, a hip-shaking point dance, crashing his car and rebirthing covered in white fake blood, advice is your pick. the song & choreo is extra fast-paced and even includes rap bits. an extremely challening piece to perform.

danger (2014) — his solo debut and a game-changing, ultra-recognizable era. thank god he took the leap. from bottle blonde waves to piercings to sparkle suits. danger swept the masses, especially the stages took the kpop world by storm since he’s notoriously been stripping his jacket off.

flame of love (2017) — an acoustic guitar-heavy j-pop release that makes for a textbook romantic ballad with a sad twist of losing your lover. the video was much talked about for featuring a model and the visual effects. taemin combusts in furiously sparking flames and becomes a phoenix. simply amazing.

two kids (2020) — astonishing vocal display, hands down. another sad as hell bop with taemin roaming the streets and suburbs of paris. dancing his heart out, full of regrets and nostalgia. just an allround well-executed broken heart song.

sayonara hitori (2016) — dance spectacle with stunning vocal belts. taemin in a satin gown dancing on a piano, in front of a giant moon, petals raining down, then he’s hanging with samurai in a scorching lava field, nothing left to wish for. breaching into the japanese market with a melancholic atmosphere and lots of animation again.

thirsty (2017) — um. the title says it all. you know what’s coming. taemin putting in the floor work in a red suit. here goes the fisheye lense effect, aand intense vocals. it’s the concert version of the dance so you’re getting a full choreo meal here.

press your number (2016) — another banger with a dramatic action plot, shoulder-revealing dance, and taemin being tied up (you never guessed). another day, another demolished car, we’re channeling road movie vibes here. tw for blood.

drip drop (2016) — just taemin sexily dancing in the scorching desert with black clothes on, actually a winter turtleneck, nothing special to see here at all. the choreography has caused hilarious memes. another performance-only video so you get every move right here.

idea (2020) — another mesmerizing recent song sampling a ‘killing me softly’ tag and bringing on the angelic sweater fashion. idea’s rooftop choreography has been dubbed as almost impossible to cover. how he’s not breaking his every limb is one of k-pop’s biggest mysteries.

+ a personal japanese song favorite: tease (2019) — doesn’t have a music video, but it’s a perfect jam that sticks with you. don’t look up the lyrics unless you have holy water available. PS: holy water (2019) is also a taemin song, what a coincidence huh. at best, listen to them parallel to holy-fy his teasing. taemin stan life hack.

3. popular fancams

taemin being known for his unique dancing style, artistic vision, gorgeous outfits and jewels, arresting silhouette, eye contact, and the ever-popular T-pose, there’s a lot of dazzling live footage to behold. true story, chances are he ripped his pants in most of these because he dances so passionately.

move 190518 — the one that changed it all. you’ll get ‘move disease’ (as knetz called it) after watching this, too. the waist harness outfit with the glove and heavy makeup. the stage presence. the character. the beauty of him. that’s why you pay for the internet.

jopping — taemin debuted the legendary meme artifact at capitol records. this fancam garnered praise for him discarding his defunct mic pack and dancing without hearing the music in-ear which is extremely hard to do. he also helped other members within light speed to correct their choreo positions. 1000% professional.

idea vertical fancam — taemin is basically gomez addams confirmed. amazing black skirt outfit and natural hair, and rhinestones on the face. a goth husband.

tiger inside focus — super m’s catboy athem. all in 4K. if you want taemin’s take on feline moves, head right here.

want — some red suit and signature glove goodness. his fluid dancing is hypnotic to no end. feathery light vocals, feathery light movements — but every step accurate, a winding body to behold. swoon material.

artistic groove stage — underappreciated taemin song. great blue blouse styling (it really is one of the best hues on him beside bright red and black), cat-like movement across the stage. watch his hands: the speed, it’s incredible.

sherlock in 2016— SHINee’s back! with the unmistakable choreo. reprising an oldie but goldie in another all-black outfit, fervently danced. taemin’s long hair from back then is very missed, we got it back for advice, but this stunner is also right up there with the best casual tuxedo styles. taemin’s famous legs in ripped jeans, prepare to be wowed.

view rehearsal — legendary banger. purple hair taemin with a cute corn tee, dancing impeccably and with such dynamism. how he moves every axis of his body is simply stellar.

odd eye focus — stunning concept. great intensity. taemin being such a captivating beau.

don’t call me focus — wanna see him pop off? shinee’s recent anthem is just perfect. expressive outfits. amazing footwork. PS: SHINee say don’t call me but klutz king taemin leaves his phone in the fridge by accident (no joke, this happened) so it’ll be difficult to call him in the first place lmao!

lucifer in 2015 — give it up for SHINee again! a bop that never gets out of fashion, and taemin looks adorable as hell in his oversized sweater. even if you haven’t dabbled in SHINee, you gotta know lucifer.

4. groundbreaking stages

as every other taemin gif tumblr tag will tell you, his most frequent habit is getting possessed on stage. now really, the man’s work ethic is tireless. the resulting performance skill and splendor always turns heads. taemin’s appeal in four words: he draws you in. his soft yet soaring vocals — all sustained during choreographies as bonkers as that — are an absolute treat. enjoy one of the most unique voices and stage presences in the biz.

door at mama 2017 — oh my god. taking performance to a new level. here’s taemin perfecting the concept of becoming art with his body. one of his most-reblogged stages ever.

sexuality — outrageous. pure hard stan hype. watch at your own risk. taemin’s juiciest song is here to put you in a coma with a painfully tight suit, dripping sweat, and a pumping mega beat. the two (!) dance breaks are a new level of horny jail. thank god it doesn’t have a music video. taemin is proof that SM’s k-pop vision ain’t for kids. the track has blatant moans mixed into it. and the things his waist can do... bruh. to make it worse: thigh grab!

move & danger @ dream concert — his sinning continues. if there’s rain in the move music video, why not on stage, too? water bomb festival is a joke compared to this. taemin in a tanktop, 1000% live singing his debut and smash hit, that’s making for the best pictures + experience ever. meanwhile, the fans in the first row are so cute in their rain coats 😆❤️

taemin medley at mama 2020 — beautiful. just beautiful. prince taemin has arrived. they even make him look like he descended from the ceiling with a gigantic cape. this dude saved my 2020. includes an intro, criminal, heaven, and idea. absolute top-notch.

taemin + kai: pretty boy stage — a much-anticipated collab of the best friends ever. lord knows how often they practiced dance over the years together. new takes on masculinity, composed by jonghyun. the impact was huge, kai and taemin are physical performance aces and overall concept vanguards whatever they lay their attention on so this is grade A 2016 kpop history in one video.

taemin + sunmi — a joint stage of criminal x gashina. oh yeah. it trended like nothing else before and enthralled unsuspecting bisexuals worldwide. that gun dance and taemin’s low-cut outfit: for the books. these two just own the retro horror genre and it’s a collab on eye level. the crowd’s eyes continuously pop from their sockets because there are so many plot twists. this is what happens when sunmi breaks out her fiercest choreos on a variety show and taemin is her witness: instantly reached out to work together, the deal was sealed. plot summary: sunmi shoots taemin for his sexiness. subscribed, liked, sold and notified.

want stages mix — the crowd was wild. the fanchants! a cut of all his performances and thereby also the fantastic suit outfits. such a visual.

criminal at KBS — as a heaven and hell juxtaposition. this stage is just amazingly pompous and so in character. taemin is winding on the floor and going through it so, very worth the watch. he’s on fire, man.

thirsty at m countdown — oh well. you know how it goes. a take from the comments: “I mean he could've just asked for a cup of water instead!”

taemin + boa: only one — two kpop giants who’ve been there since ages, so you can imagine the quality. whenever taemin pops up at mama, something good happens (this time, it’s soft skinship), and boa is the undeniable 1st gen queen who had taemin as her backup/co-dancer 7 years ago already! these two have the most terrific long-term dance careers ever so it’s perfect to see them share the stage.

famous live — ...come on. this absolutely needed a huge concert audience.

super m: no manners — a perfect example how taemin really uses the stage fully instead of just doing step sequences, portraying perfect emotions and posture. every bone in his body is putting in the work. years of training.

criminal live — clean, captivating, inventive. when taemin kneels, time stops. criminal is in another league. relatable comment quote: “I would just like to apologize to my past self for not listening to Taemin songs sooner.”

black rose — a rap collab with kid milli that just grows on you more and more. hot co-ed backup dancer alert. considered a classic, well-loved track among fans.

taemin + jimin: showdown — and you thought it can’t get any better? the two bffs teamed up to teach ‘em all how to dance and grind. a cultural reset and i wish twomin collabed again because the sheer artistic and athletic opportunities are boundless.

5. other memorable appearances

dingo music 100 challenge. taemin dishing up several point dances in 100 seconds perfectly. the heaps of praise in the comment section speak for themselves. if you want to see the living legend in action and all the best bits in one spot (if that’s even possible), watch this.

taemin at studio choom — we all love this format. treat yourself to a great recent performance of advice.

move dance practice — here comes the master of sensuality. highly acclaimed by experts, so many views, and he’s not even in full stage mode/fashion yet. taemin confidently owns androgyny the very best out there.

idea dance practice — here you get see his latest hardest choreo ever in action. taemin makes it look so easy... while it gets more and more and even more back-breaking. it’s a popular opinion that he’s considered the best dancer in kpop right up there with kai. PS: also watch it if you wanna see T-poses to wow you, never a bad idea (pun intended).

idea at dingo music — full glorious roof top dance with a crop top sweater to mesmerize you in 4K. all the moves clearly filmed.

criminal dance practice — the mv shows a lot of it, but here’s the extended wrist tie dance. oh my. taemin just aces fanservice.

criminal dance teaching with mark — nct/super m rap prodigy mark lee trying to pull off the tied wrists hilariously.

idols dancing to move — they’ve all done it.

taemin on Problematic Men — with the topic of visual riddles, puzzles, and math tasks. worry not, he got the numbers down. hot dance and hot brain content, we love to see it. he’s called the ace with good reason. TL;DR: here goes taemin making other guys look like has-beens as usual.

6. starstruck reaction cams

everyone around him has a 99% chance to be a shawol, and taemin’s immediate impact up close is always the talk of the town. that’s he’s known for having equal parts fangirls and fanboys both in the fandom and industry itself is the cherry on top. everywhere he rolls up, people go DAMN out loud.

super m & fans react to the jopping mv premiere — the most nervous you’ll ever see a k-pop group. when baekhyun makes a serious face and even ten loses his cool, you know the stakes are high. taemin: upper right, platinum hair. this went down at capitol records: fans & the CEOs sat with the members. it was madness. taemin finally got to debut with his bestie and co-pro dancer kai (grey hair, next to him), and super m is SM’s first ever all star group with taemin having iconic parts. so this was in all regards a huge deal. i break into a sweat watching this every time. since all super m members are choreo monsters and reaction kings, you need 7 pairs of eyes. if you haven’t jopped today, do it now.

bts reacts to sunmi and taemin’s stage — a 12 million views video including jungkook being extra shook and taehyung sensually dancing to MOVE. as mentioned, bts is well-acquainted with taemin, he’s best friends with jimin who is beaming his heart out in the video. glorious faces when suddenly, the whole song becomes unpredictable.

seoul fashion week performance reaction — who doesn’t wanna see taemin sweeping the catwalk while the fanboys hyperventilate in the first row. the crowd held back more to hear the music and it’s a fashion audience but jaws were really dropped that day.

exo reacts to move — another viral reaction cam, audio isn’t the best but the scene is legendary. look to the left where baekhyun and kai are grooving it up. vernon and jooheon are also reacting in such an animated way, look to the far right corner, love the enthusiasm, same.

minho reacts to advice — together with taemin who seriously evaluates himself, and they explain a little, it’s always enlightening to hear taemin’s thoughts and artistic ideas. he has regular input with the direction and choreo and knows exactly what he wants. since he’s a film major, he has great understanding of visual art.

extra: shinee reacts to bts’ perfect man — now the other way around, it’s taemin reacting! shinhwa are label co-mates to shinee, so this is multifandom gold. another staple that has to be included. we got ot5 shinee jamming out and documenting everything they see freely, taemin is bopping along, the vibe is immaculate.

7. extra meme segment

it’s no surprise that taemin is a walking meme since he went viral as ‘the kpop dude’ gif and has naughty maknae status. the inside jokes are endless, so this is the tip of the iceberg — your youtube algorithm will do the rest.

taemin recreating the apple kick scene from twilight on we got married: he’s called ‘magic hands’ so watch what happens.

shinee imitates his dancing.

his mortal enemy: bugs. 🐝(meanwhile, he can have snakes crawl all over his neck and stuff)

taemin, ten, and lucas twerking goes with everything.

expectation VS reality.

classic taememe reactions: the kpop dude.

taemin can’t stop talking about shinee <3

“please don’t cheat on me :(“ — taemin before enlistment. — don’t worry taemin, now this thread is out there.

english king.

famous misheard soy un dorito lyric, now available as a ringtone.

long haired taemin wildly flipping his extensions around cuz he can.

taemin, master of perfectly coordinated dance, but famous clumsy disaster.

super m crackhead compilation 5000.

kai & taemin set a barbecue on fire, subsequently make the news.

taemin on knowing bros cut. we all know... this show is pure chaos.

more magic hands taemin with shinee.

the man, summarized in two minutes.

legendary vintage cringe treasure: taemin on SNL as a “tsundere cafe” waiter 😂

taemin films a cheesy drama, super m loses it.

random talent compilation.

super m being shawols and fanboys for taemin.

comforting us: english compilation so we don’t feel sad about enlistment.

and: google shinee’s halloween costumes (!!) for the annual chaotic SM party which has met gala status at SM. they’ve always been killing it and it’s hilarious. taemin dressed up as howl and vampires, need i say more.

////

8. BONUS: i really don’t mean to drag you into that rabbit hole and finish you off entirely, but... taemin has an extremely adorable cat.

yes. since early 2021. kkoongie, who he smooches 24/7. shawols were in shambles for weeks when the news dropped. these two have all kinds of anecdotes, e.g. kkoong likes to doze inside taemin’s piano lmao! a true connoisseur. she naps a lot in general, everyone’s all over it.

recently, taemin dropped the pick-up line of the century asking taemints about who wants to be kkoong’s co-parent. oh gee. who wouldn’t like being part of the lee family 😄

kkoong grew up well, and stays with kwonho while taemin’s in the army for now, there are regular updates. they also have loads of videos out there (and fan tweets + accs), i’m so sorry if you ever watch one because then you’ve fallen for them completely.

that being said: have fun browsing. taemin is a one in a million artist, i love introducing him to you ✊and if you already know him, i hope this thread can bridge his service a little. if you like, reblog so others can get to know his work as well. if there are any mistakes in here, or something else iconic that needs to be listed but i forgot, just shoot me a reply.

601 notes · View notes