#producer farmer company

[lawgicalindia28]

A producer is somebody engaged in a close-knit or associated activity with the principal producers. Therefore, "Producer Company" is a general term for anything below.

producing, assembling, acquiring, classifying, pooling, managing, reselling, promoting, and exporting the primary producers of the members or importing goods or services

[cosmicwhoresimpingismyliving]

Look at my farmers market goodies🥺🥰

[heerglobalcollaborations]

Top 10 list of Farmer Producer Organizations (FPOs) in Gujarat and Their Brands and Products

In the agricultural terrain of Gujarat, Farmer Producer Organizations (FPOs) are heralding a transformative era, empowering farmers and nurturing sustainable agricultural practices. These collaborative ventures unite farmers, consolidating their resources and knowledge to amplify productivity, facilitate better market entry, and establish distinctive brand identities for their agricultural products. This piece explores the flourishing FPO ecosystem in Gujarat, shedding light on noteworthy brands and products that have arisen from these collective endeavors.

[fpotci01]

Understanding the Legal Framework for Farmer Producer Organizations in India

India's agriculture sector is the backbone of the nation's economy, employing millions and providing food for the country. However, many farmers, particularly small and marginal ones, face challenges such as limited access to markets, credit, and technology. To address these issues, the concept of Farmer Producer Organizations (FPOs) has been introduced to bring farmers together and empower them collectively. FPOs provide farmers with the benefits of scale and allow them to improve their livelihoods. But like any organization, FPOs need a strong legal framework to operate effectively.

This blog aims to simplify the legal structure surrounding FPOs in India, making it easier to understand how these organizations work and what laws govern them.

What is an FPO?

A Farmer Producer Organization (FPO) is a collective of farmers who come together to pool their resources and efforts for better agricultural practices and market access. The FPO model allows small farmers to work as a group, helping them gain bargaining power, access modern agricultural tools, and improve their financial situation. In simple terms, FPOs are like cooperatives that help farmers achieve better prices for their products and reduce the cost of inputs.

The Legal Framework Governing FPOs in India

FPOs in India are primarily governed by the Companies Act, 2013. Specifically, they are registered under the sub-category of Farmer Producer Companies (FPCs). Let’s break down the key elements of the legal framework for FPOs and how it ensures their smooth operation.

Companies Act, 2013: The Companies Act provides the foundational structure for Farmer Producer Companies. An FPC is legally a corporate entity but operates like a cooperative. This unique legal structure allows farmers to retain control while enjoying the benefits of a formal organization. Under the Act, an FPO can be formed by a minimum of 10 members, all of whom must be primary producers like farmers, fishermen, or dairy producers.

NABARD and Other Financial Institutions: The National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development (NABARD) plays a crucial role in supporting FPOs. NABARD has established the NABARD FPO Portal, which serves as a platform for registration, knowledge sharing, and access to government schemes. This legal support helps FPOs secure funding and credit, allowing them to invest in better technology, seeds, and infrastructure.

FPO Registration: The process of FPO registration is overseen by the Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA). To register as a Farmer Producer Company, farmers must fulfill certain criteria like having at least 10 members and engaging primarily in agriculture or allied activities. The registration process is relatively straightforward but requires documentation such as identity proof, land ownership records, and a business plan. Once registered, the FPO becomes a corporate entity with the rights to buy, sell, and enter contracts on behalf of its members.

Farmer Producer Company (FPC): While an FPO can be a cooperative or a company, most FPOs in India are registered as Farmer Producer Companies (FPCs). This structure allows farmers to act as shareholders in the company, making it easier to access markets and negotiate better deals. The FPC model also allows for profit distribution among members, ensuring that the financial benefits are shared equally.

Taxation and Benefits: The Government of India has introduced various tax benefits and subsidies to encourage the formation of FPOs. FPCs, for example, enjoy tax exemptions under certain conditions. These tax incentives are crucial for FPOs, as they help reduce operating costs and make it easier for small farmers to participate.

Interactive Data Platform for FPOs: Digital platforms, like the FPO Hub and FPO Platform for India, are becoming increasingly important in modern agriculture. These platforms provide farmers with access to interactive data, helping them track market prices, access weather updates, and learn about new farming techniques. The legal framework surrounding FPOs is expanding to include digital initiatives, ensuring that FPOs can leverage technology for better agricultural practices.

The Role of Farmer Cooperatives and Producer Organizations in Indian Agriculture

Farmer cooperatives and producer organizations have long been essential for Indian agriculture, providing collective strength to small farmers. An FPO operates like a modern-day cooperative but with a legal structure that allows it to operate as a company. This hybrid model combines the best of both worlds: the collective power of a cooperative and the efficiency and accountability of a corporate entity.

Access to Markets: One of the biggest challenges for small farmers is market access. They often have to rely on middlemen, who take a significant portion of their profits. FPOs help eliminate the middlemen by allowing farmers to sell their products directly to consumers, wholesalers, or even export markets. This direct market access leads to better prices and more significant financial gains for the farmers.

Improved Access to Credit: Individual farmers often struggle to secure loans due to a lack of collateral or credit history. As a collective, FPOs have a better chance of securing loans from financial institutions. This access to credit enables them to invest in modern farming equipment, seeds, fertilizers, and other inputs. Financial institutions like NABARD offer special schemes for FPOs, making credit more accessible.

Better Agricultural Practices: FPOs allow farmers to adopt better agricultural practices by pooling resources for training and capacity-building programs. They can learn about sustainable farming techniques, crop diversification, and how to reduce input costs. FPOs also enable farmers to access bulk purchases of inputs like fertilizers and pesticides at lower prices.

Benefits of FPOs in Agriculture

The benefits of FPOs are extensive, impacting both the individual farmer and the larger agricultural ecosystem in India.

Increased Income: By collectively marketing their produce, FPO members can secure better prices, leading to increased income. This higher income helps farmers improve their standard of living and provides financial stability.

Economies of Scale: As individual farmers, accessing markets or purchasing inputs can be expensive. However, as a collective, FPOs can take advantage of economies of scale. Bulk purchases of seeds, fertilizers, and equipment reduce costs, and selling in bulk can lead to higher prices.

Risk Management: Agriculture in India is subject to risks such as poor weather, market fluctuations, and pest infestations. FPOs allow farmers to share the risks by working together. Some FPOs even offer insurance products to protect their members against crop failure or other disasters.

Sustainable Practices: FPOs promote sustainable farming practices, which are better for the environment and the long-term health of the land. By adopting practices like crop rotation, organic farming, and efficient water use, FPO members can reduce their ecological footprint while improving their yields.

Challenges and the Way Forward

Despite the numerous benefits, FPOs face several challenges, such as lack of awareness, difficulties in registration, and insufficient financial support. For FPOs to truly transform Indian agriculture, these challenges must be addressed.

Awareness and Education: Many farmers are still unaware of the benefits of joining an FPO. There needs to be more awareness campaigns to educate farmers about the advantages of collective farming and the legal framework that supports it.

Simplifying the Registration Process: While registering an FPO is relatively straightforward, it can still be daunting for farmers with little experience in formal business processes. Simplifying the registration process and offering legal support can help more farmers form FPOs.

Financial and Technical Support: While organizations like NABARD offer financial support, more needs to be done to ensure that FPOs have access to the resources they need to succeed. This includes not only credit but also technical support in terms of training and access to technology.

Conclusion

Farmer Producer Organizations (FPOs) play a critical role in transforming Indian agriculture by empowering farmers and improving their access to markets, technology, and credit. The legal framework governing FPOs ensures that they can operate effectively and sustainably, providing long-term benefits to farmers and the agricultural sector as a whole.

At the Tata-Cornell Institute, we believe in the power of FPOs to create a brighter, more sustainable future for Indian agriculture. Through legal support, training, and technological advancement, FPOs can help shape a prosperous and resilient farming community in India. visit: https://fpo.tci.cornell.edu/

[farmerpposts]

Revolutionize Agriculture with Farmer Producer Company Software | Optimize Farm Management & Boost Profits :-

Discover the leading Farmer Producer Company Software designed to streamline farm management, enhance productivity, and maximize profits. Our innovative solution empowers farmer producer companies with tools for efficient crop planning, financial management, and market access. Boost your agricultural business today with our comprehensive software suite tailored for modern farming needs.

[violottie]

Boycott Israeli Dates this Ramadan, from Call 2 Action Now, 28/Feb/2024: (caption under images)

This Ramadan, don’t break your fast with an Israeli date. Stand in solidarity with the Palestinian people.

Israel’s genocidal assault on Palestinians in the Gaza Strip has now killed tens of thousands. Palestinians, facing down Israel’s catastrophic violence, call on us to boycott Israeli products in solidarity with their struggle for freedom.

Follow this quick guide to boycotting Israeli dates:

• Always check the label when buying dates. Don’t buy dates that are produced or packaged in Israel or its West Bank settlements. If no country of origin can be found on the box, check the retailer’s website.

• One of Israel’s largest exporters is called Hadiklaim. It sells dates in supermarkets under these names: King Solomon, Jordan River and Jordan River Bio-Top, as well as under the labels of supermarket chains. Check the box carefully, if the dates were “exported by Hadiklaim” – don’t buy them.

• Avoid these companies: Mehadrin, MTex, Edom, Carmel Agrexco, and Arava

#checkthelabel is not enough. Israel has been caught labelling their dates as ‘produce of Palestine’. Tesco, Sainsbury’s, Waitrose, M&S, Morrison, Aldi, Lidl and Asda package Israeli dates under their own labels!

Buy dates from Zaytoun, Alard, Yaffa, and Holy Land Date all support Palestinian Farmers. If you cannot get hold of these brands then buy dates from Tunisia, Saudi Arabia, Iran, Pakistan, UAE and Algeria.

[mostlysignssomeportents]

The one weird monopoly trick that gave us Walmart and Amazon and killed Main Street

I'm coming to BURNING MAN! On TUESDAY (Aug 27) at 1PM, I'm giving a talk called "DISENSHITTIFY OR DIE!" at PALENQUE NORTE (7&E). On WEDNESDAY (Aug 28) at NOON, I'm doing a "Talking Caterpillar" Q&A at LIMINAL LABS (830&C).

Walmart didn't just happen. The rise of Walmart – and Amazon, its online successor – was the result of a specific policy choice, the decision by the Reagan administration not to enforce a key antitrust law. Walmart may have been founded by Sam Walton, but its success (and the demise of the American Main Street) are down to Reaganomics.

The law that Reagan neutered? The Robinson-Patman Act, a very boring-sounding law that makes it illegal for powerful companies (like Walmart) to demand preferential pricing from their suppliers (farmers, packaged goods makers, meat producers, etc). The idea here is straightforward. A company like Walmart is a powerful buyer (a "monopsonist" – compare with "monopolist," a powerful seller). That means that they can demand deep discounts from suppliers. Smaller stores – the mom and pop store on your Main Street – don't have the clout to demand those discounts. Worse, because those buyers are weak, the sellers – packaged goods companies, agribusiness cartels, Big Meat – can actually charge them more to make up for the losses they're taking in selling below cost to Walmart.

Reagan ordered his antitrust cops to stop enforcing Robinson-Patman, which was a huge giveaway to big business. Of course, that's not how Reagan framed it: He called Robinson-Patman a declaration of "war on low prices," because it prevented big companies from using their buying power to squeeze huge discounts. Reagan's court sorcerers/economists asserted that if Walmart could get goods at lower prices, they would sell goods at lower prices.

Which was true…up to a point. Because preferential discounting (offering better discounts to bigger customers) creates a structural advantage over smaller businesses, it meant that big box stores would eventually eliminate virtually all of their smaller competitors. That's exactly what happened: downtowns withered, suburban big boxes grew. Spending that would have formerly stayed in the community was whisked away to corporate headquarters. These corporate HQs were inevitably located in "onshore-offshore" tax haven states, meaning they were barely taxed at the state level. That left plenty of money in these big companies' coffers to spend on funny accountants who'd help them avoid federal taxes, too. That's another structural advantage the big box stores had over the mom-and-pops: not only did they get their inventory at below-cost discounts, they didn't have to pay tax on the profits, either.

MBA programs actually teach this as a strategy to pursue: they usually refer to Amazon's "flywheel" where lower prices bring in more customers which allows them to demand even lower prices:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BaSwWYemLek

You might have heard about rural and inner-city "food deserts," where all the independent grocery stores have shuttered, leaving behind nothing but dollar stores? These are the direct product of the decision not to enforce Robinson-Patman. Dollar stores target working class neighborhoods with functional, beloved local grocers. They open multiple dollar stores nearby (nearly all the dollar stores you see are owned by one of two conglomerates, no matter what the sign over the door says). They price goods below cost and pay for high levels of staffing, draining business off the community grocery store until it collapses. Then, all the dollar stores except one close and the remaining store fires most of its staff (working at a dollar store is incredibly dangerous, thanks to low staffing levels that make them easy targets for armed robbers). Then, they jack up prices, selling goods in "cheater" sizes that are smaller than the normal retail packaging, and which are only made available to large dollar store conglomerates:

https://pluralistic.net/2023/03/27/walmarts-jackals/#cheater-sizes

Writing in The American Prospect, Max M Miller and Bryce Tuttle1 – a current and a former staffer for FTC Commissioner Alvaro Bedoya – write about the long shadow cast by Reagan's decision to put Robinson-Patman in mothballs:

https://prospect.org/economy/2024-08-13-stopping-excessive-market-power-monopoly/

They tell the story of Robinson-Patman's origins in 1936, when A&P was using preferential discounts to destroy the independent grocery sector and endanger the American food system. A&P didn't just demand preferential discounts from its suppliers; it also charged them a fortune to be displayed on its shelves, an early version of Amazon's $38b/year payola system:

https://pluralistic.net/2022/11/28/enshittification/#relentless-payola

They point out that Robinson-Patman didn't really need to be enacted; America already had an antitrust law that banned this conduct: section 2 of the the Clayton Act, which was passed in 1914. But for decades, the US courts refused to interpret the Clayton Act according to its plain meaning, with judges tying themselves in knots to insist that the law couldn't possibly mean what it said. Robinson-Patman was one of a series of antitrust laws that Congress passed in a bid to explain in words so small even federal judges could understand them that the purpose of American antitrust law was to keep corporations weak:

https://pluralistic.net/2023/04/14/aiming-at-dollars/#not-men

Both the Clayton Act and Robinson-Patman reject the argument that it's OK to let monopolies form and come to dominate critical sectors of the American economy based on the theoretical possibility that this will lead to lower prices. They reject this idea first as a legal matter. We don't let giant corporations victimize small businesses and their suppliers just because that might help someone else.

Beyond this, there's the realpolitik of monopoly. Yes, companies could pass lower costs on to customers, but will they? Look at Amazon: the company takes $0.45-$0.51 out of every dollar that its sellers earn, and requires them to offer their lowest price on Amazon. No one has a 45-51% margin, so every seller jacks up their prices on Amazon, but you don't notice it, because Amazon forces them to jack up prices everywhere else:

https://pluralistic.net/2024/03/01/managerial-discretion/#junk-fees

The Robinson-Patman Act did important work, and its absence led to many of the horribles we're living through today. This week on his Peoples & Things podcast, Lee Vinsel talked with Benjamin Waterhouse about his new book, One Day I’ll Work for Myself: The Dream and Delusion That Conquered America:

https://athenaeum.vt.domains/peoplesandthings/2024/08/12/78-benjamin-c-waterhouse-on-one-day-ill-work-for-myself-the-dream-and-delusion-that-conquered-america/

Towards the end of the discussion, Vinsel and Waterhouse turn to Robinson-Patman, its author, Wright Patman, and the politics of small business in America. They point out – correctly – that Wright Patman was something of a creep, a "Dixiecrat" (southern Democrat) who was either an ideological segregationist or someone who didn't mind supporting segregation irrespective of his beliefs.

That's a valid critique of Wright Patman, but it's got little bearing on the substance and history of the law that bears his name, the Robinson-Patman Act. Vinsel and Waterhouse get into that as well, and while they made some good points that I wholeheartedly agreed with, I fiercely disagree with the conclusion they drew from these points.

Vinsel and Waterhouse point out (again, correctly) that small businesses have a long history of supporting reactionary causes and attacking workers' rights – associations of small businesses, small women-owned business, and small minority-owned businesses were all in on opposition to minimum wages and other key labor causes.

But while this is all true, that doesn't make Robinson-Patman a reactionary law, or bad for workers. The point of protecting small businesses from the predatory practices of large firms is to maintain an American economy where business can't trump workers or government. Large companies are literally ungovernable: they have gigantic war-chests they can spend lobbying governments and corrupting the political process, and concentrated sectors find it comparatively easy to come together to decide on a single lobbying position and then make it reality.

As Vinsel and Waterhouse discuss, US big business has traditionally hated small business. They recount a notorious and telling anaecdote about the editor of the Chamber of Commerce magazine asking his boss if he could include coverage of small businesses, given the many small business owners who belonged to the Chamber, only to be told, "Over my dead body." Why did – why does – big business hate small business so much? Because small businesses wreck the game. If they are included in hearings, notices of inquiry, or just given a vote on what the Chamber of Commerce will lobby for with their membership dollars, they will ask for things that break with the big business lobbying consensus.

That's why we should like small business. Not because small business owners are incapable of being petty tyrants, but because whatever else, they will be petty. They won't be able to hire million-dollar-a-month union-busting law-firms, they won't be able to bribe Congress to pass favorable laws, they can't capture their regulators with juicy offers of sweet jobs after their government service ends.

Vinsel and Waterhouse point out that many large firms emerged during the era in which Robinson-Patman was in force, but that misunderstands the purpose of Robinson-Patman: it wasn't designed to prevent any large businesses from emerging. There are some capital-intensive sectors (say, chip fabrication) where the minimum size for doing anything is pretty damned big.

As Miller and Tuttle write:

The goal of RPA was not to create a permanent Jeffersonian agrarian republic of exclusively small businesses. It was to preserve a diverse economy of big and small businesses. Congress recognized that the needs of communities and people—whether in their role as consumers, business owners, or workers—are varied and diverse. A handful of large chains would never be able to meet all those needs in every community, especially if they are granted pricing power.

The fight against monopoly is only secondarily a fight between small businesses and giant ones. It's foundationally a fight about whether corporations should have so much power that they are too big to fail, too big to jail, and too big to care.

Community voting for SXSW is live! If you wanna hear RIDA QADRI and me talk about how GIG WORKERS can DISENSHITTIFY their jobs with INTEROPERABILITY, VOTE FOR THIS ONE!

If you'd like an essay-formatted version of this post to read or share, here's a link to it on pluralistic.net, my surveillance-free, ad-free, tracker-free blog:

https://pluralistic.net/2024/08/14/the-price-is-wright/#enforcement-priorities

[tkagro]

Best Place to Buy Any Agriculture Machine- TK Agro Pvt Ltd

Looking to buy top-quality Agriculture Machine or tools? Look no further! TK Agro Pvt Ltd is your one-stop destination for all your agricultural equipment needs. With a wide range of machines available, we offer the best solutions to enhance productivity on your farm. For more information visit our site and contact us- https://goo.gl/maps/Liv6YW9bEpALtL1o9

[reasonsforhope]

Legit though, we should start turning ecosystem restoration and work to make our world more tolerant to the effects of climate change into annual holidays and festivals

Like how just about every culture used to have festivals to celebrate the beginning of the harvest or its end, or the beginning of planting, or how whole communities used to host barn raisings and quilting bees - everyone coming together at once to turn the work of months or years into the work of a few days

Humble suggestions for festival types:

Goat festival

Besides controlled burns (which you can't do if there's too much dead brush), the fastest, most effective, and most cost-efficient way to clear brush before fire season - esp really heavy dead brush - is to just. Put a bunch of goats on your land for a few days!

Remember that Shark Tank competitor who wanted to start a goat rental company, and everyone was like wtf? There was even a whole John Oliver bit making fun of the idea? Well THAT JUST PROVES THEY'RE FROM NICE WET PLACES, because goat rental companies are totally a thing, and they're great.

So like. Why don't we have a weekend where everyone with goats just takes those goats to the nearest land that needs a ton of clearing? Public officials could put up maps of where on public lands grazing is needed, and where it definitely shouldn't happen. Farmers and people/groups with a lot of acres that need clearing can post Goat Requests.

Little kids can make goat-themed crafts and give the goats lots of pets or treats at the end of the day for doing such a good job. Volunteers can help wrangle things so goats don't get where they're not supposed to (and everyone fences off land nowadays anyway, mostly). And the goats, of course, would be in fucking banquet paradise.

Planting Festival and Harvest Festival

Why mess with success??? Bring these back where they've disappeared!!! Time to swarm the community gardens and help everyone near you with a farm make sure that all of their seeds are sown and none of the food goes to waste in the fields, decaying and unpicked.

And then set up distribution parts of the festival so all the extra food gets where it needs to be! Boxes of free lemons in front of your house because you have 80 goddamned lemons are great, but you know what else would be great? An organized effort to take that shit to food pantries (which SUPER rarely get fresh produce, because they can't hold anything perishable for long at all) and community/farmer's markets

Rain Capture Festival

The "water year" - how we track annual rainfall and precipitation - is offset from the regular calendar year because, like, that's just when water cycles through the ecosystems (e.g. meltwater). At least in the US, the water year is October 1st through September 30th of the next year, because October 1st is around when all the snowmelt from last year is gone, and a new cycle is starting as rain begins to fall again in earnest.

So why don't we all have a big barn raising equivalent every September to build rain capture infrastructure?

Team up with some neighbors to turn one of those little grass strips on the sidewalk into a rain-garden with fall-planting plants. Go down to your local church and help them install some gutters and rain barrels. Help deculvert rivers so they run through the dirt again, and make sure all the storm drains in your neighborhood are nice and clear.

Even better, all of this - ESPECIALLY the rain gardens - will also help a ton with flood control!

I'm so serious about how cool this could be, yall.

And people who can't or don't want to do physical stuff for any of these festivals could volunteer to watch children or cook food for the festival or whatever else might need to be done!

Parties afterward to celebrate all the good work done! Community building and direct local improvements to help protect ourselves from climate change!

The possibilities are literally endless, so not to sound like an influencer or some shit, but please DO comment or reply or put it in the notes if you have thoughts, esp on other things we could hold festivals like this for.

Canning festivals. "Dig your elderly neighbors out of the snow" festivals. Endangered species nesting count festival. Plant fruit trees on public land and parks festival. All of the things that I don't know anywhere near enough to think of. Especially in more niche or extreme ecosystems, there are so many possibilities that could do a lot of good

[chandan-todi]

Farmer Producer Company (FPC) or Farmer Producer Organisation (FPO) is an organization that has been developed taking into consideration the requirements of farmers, agriculturists, fishermen, weavers, milk producers, and persons engaged in farming activities, collectively known as ‘Producers’.

[nilayoramfpc]

Nilayoram Farmers Producer Company (FPC) is a farmer-owned and farmer-managed organization based in the Indian state of Kerala. Nilayoram Farmers Producer Company(NPC) provides many services to support farmers.

[fpotci01]

FPOs: The Future of Indian Agriculture

Are you a farmer seeking collective strength? Join an FPO and unlock new opportunities. Tata-Cornell Institute provides end-to-end FPO support, from formation to market linkages. Benefit from our interactive data platform for informed decision-making. Empower your community and thrive. Visit here:- https://fpo.tci.cornell.edu/

[specshroom]

A Mischievous Fairy

˚˖′.⊹ ࣪ ˖˚·˖*.⊹ ࣪ ˖˚·˖′.⊹ ࣪ ˖˚·˖*.⊹ ࣪ ˖˚·˚˖′.⊹ ࣪ ˖˚·˖*.⊹

When a humble farmer decided to live on the outskirts of town right next to the forest he did not expect to make friends with a small temperamental creature from the forest.

It was a pretty good deal you had going on, you help his plants grow with fairy magic and he gives you a safe warm place to sleep and home cooked meals. Most days are spent with you doing your best to annoy the poor farmer as he tries to remind himself that you're the reason his produce sells for such high prices.

You fly around his head making little jingle noises and he tries to ignore you and go on with his work. You steal little things like spoons, screwdrivers, pencils and put them in places he can't reach like on top of the cabinets and shelves. When you get mad at him you grow weeds in his crops until he apologizes or gives you a gift to your liking. Despite this the farmer has grown to truly enjoy your company...for the most part.

His loneliness is getting to him and he's tried to have company over but it's kind of hard to explain to guests why there's a little, scantily clad fairy staring daggers at them the whole time. It definitely ruins the mood as he tries to convince them you won't bite (you will and you have).

One day the farmer comes home from town looking more excited than usual. You plop yourself on his head as he walks around his little cottage.

As he sorts through all the items he bought you get impatient and decide he's not paying enough attention to you. You fly right in front of his face and pose for him, showing off the new outfit you made out of flower petals in his garden.

"Not right now, Tiny."

The farmer rolls his eyes and gently shoos you away with his hand, focusing back onto his apparently very interesting haul from the market. The very rude gesture gets you all fired up and you're in his face again this time with your hands on your hips and an angry expression. The farmer sighs and gently cradles your tiny body in his hands.

"Look, I'm busy. Alright?"

He walks over to the windowsill and gently plops you down onto the little pincushion he set aside for you. You sit there with your arms crossed, glaring at him as he puts away his items.

While you're sulking you notice a little bottle of purple liquid poking out of the farmers front pocket. You quietly flutter over and sneakily inch the tiny thing out of his pocket.

"Hey!"

The farmer tries to stop you but you're much faster than him and fly up, out of his reach. The glass bottle is a little bigger than you're torso and when you inspect it the label says "Growth serum"

You let out quite a dramatic gasp and look down at the farmer, betrayal written all over your face.

"Now Tiny, don't jump to conclu-"

The farmer starts but is interrupted by a very angry fairy yelling things he doesn't understand right in his face. All he can hear is jingles but he's sure he's getting severely cussed at. He understands why, you helped this man grow his crops bigger and better than ever and now you think he wants to replace you for some stupid, probably overpriced serum?

You angrily throw the bottle to the ground and the farmer dives down to clumsily catch it before it smashes onto the floor.

As you feel tears fall down your hot cheeks, you flutter back to your windowsill and sit with your head between your knees.

"Hey, don't cry now."

The farmer sheepishly leans against the windowsill next to you.

"I promise, it's not for the plants. You already help me out so much with that and I appreciate it a lot. I don't need anything else."

You peak your head out from your arms and look at him skeptically.

He holds his hand out to you and you hesitantly flutter onto his palm, enjoying the warmth of his touch despite the cold wetness of your cheeks.

"Truth is, it's lonely for me out here... and I know you get lonely too."

You scoff at him. Obviously, the whole reason you were upset in the first place was because he was ignoring you.

"I uh... I got this for you. So we could....uh well only if you want to, I mean... I don't know."

You stare at him dumbfounded as he fumbles his words, you've never seen the farmer like this before.

You shoot up to hug his cheek, jingling in excitement. You give him tiny kisses and he laughs at the ticklish feeling. You float to the counter in front of him and bounce on your heels waiting for him.

"Alright, alright."

He chuckles at your stark change in mood and uncaps the tiny bottle of magic liquid. You brace yourself as he carefully lets one single drop fall onto your little head.

Nothing happens for a moment but before you could feel disappointed the world blurs and you're suddenly face to face with your farmer.

He stares down at where you sit on his counter, now perfectly human sized. Your cute dress didn't survive the quick transition but you don't seem to mind as you jump the poor farmer.

You grab his face and kiss him deeply. Finally feeling his lips on yours makes your wings flutter and your heart sing as you lock your legs around him to pull his body closer.

"Alright, slow down."

He says through kisses and huffed laughs as you kiss all over his face and neck.

"Now why don't you let me show you how much I appreciate you."

He mumbles in a sultry tone, bringing his hands down to grip your ass and grind your hips into him.

He laughs at the way your wings violently flutter and takes that as eager agreement.

˚˖′.⊹ ࣪ ˖˚·˖*.⊹ ࣪ ˖˚·˖′.⊹ ࣪ ˖˚·˖*.⊹ ࣪ ˖˚·˚˖′.⊹ ࣪ ˖˚·˖*.⊹

[biatconsultant]

Things to Know Before Registering for Producer Company In India

A Producer Company Registration in India is a different sort of lawful association under the helpful social orders in India. The primary reason for the Producer Company is to help farmers in agricultural creation, procurement, putting away, bundling, selling, and dissemination and give them benefits.

How Does a Producer Company Registration Come into Existence?

In India, the greater part of the Farmer lives in oppressed conditions. They don't approach the cutting-edge innovations, assets, and monetary help. Normal disasters and harvest disappointment situations aggravate it for them to make due. Large numbers of them have depended on ending their own lives. To resolve this specific issue of the farmers, the Indian Government had gathered a specialist panel driven by the noticeable financial expert Y. K. Alagh. They proposed the idea of the Producer Company Registration in 2002. From now on, it appeared.

How does a Farmer Producer Company Registration in India Work? Farmer Producer Company Registration in India is done by at least 10 individuals or 2 foundations. The mixes of both work also. It is lawfully distinguished as farmers' substance with the craving to redo individual and expert existences of farmers in the country regions.

The Essential Targets of producer Company Registered in India are 

The primary reason for the producer Company is to play out the beneath referenced subjects. 

Acquisition 

Preparation and Production 

Accumulation 

Classifying 

Amalgamate 

Supervision 

Retailing 

Trading 

Export

This large number of intentions is connected with cultivating and development. Presently organization enrollment online administrations are accessible at savvy charges. We can talk about the motivation behind the Producer Company in subtleties.

Creation, gathering, acquisition, investigating, pooling, managing, exhibiting, selling, the passage of fundamental making of the Individuals or import of products and organizations for the advantage of farmers.

Getting ready and safeguarding, drying, refining, maturing, stamping, canning, and packaging of the harvests, delivered by the Individuals.

Gathering, arrangement, or supply of cultivating gear, seeds, or consumables generally to its Individuals.

Giving guidance on the common assistance guidelines, to its individuals and others.

Conveying specific administrations, consultancy organizations, getting ready, creative wor,k and any leftover activities to improve its Individuals.

 Age, transmission, and spread of power, restoration of land and water resources, their usage, protection, and correspondence engaging to fundamental produce.

Assurance and capacity of fundamental items.

Advancing propensities for common participation among the individuals.

What are the Requirements for Producer Company Registration in India?

Some of the major requirements for Producer Company Registration in India are

A least 10 individuals or 2  institutions should meet up to make a  Producer Company.

Their blend will likewise work. The Base capital should be ₹5 lakhs. 

The base number of directors is 5. As far as possible is 15 and no more.

If it's not too much trouble, note that the  Producer Company can't be changed into a public organization.

What is the Registration Process Followed by Producer Company Registration Consultant?

Registration Process Followed By Producer Company Registration Consultant is 

Apply for the Digital Signature Certificate (DSC) and Directors Identification Number (DIN)

The name reservation application necessities to ship off to the Registrar of Companies (ROC).  The name of the organization should be finished with  "Producer Limited Company." 

After both of these cycles are finished, presently you should document the application for the fuse interaction of your producer company. You want to present the underneath referenced reports alongside the joining application.

Individuals and Directors Identity and address confirmation.

Duplicates of Aadhar Card, PAN Card, Citizen ID, Driving Permit, and Passport would function as character evidence.

A duplicate of the latest bank statement  (with address), Power Bill, Phone charge, and Gas association bill would be adequate as address verification.

DSC and DIN 

The Producer Company's Articles of Association (AOA) and Memorandum of Association (MOA). 

Organization's office address evidence (on the off chance that the organization is on leased ground, lease understanding/lease receipt and NOC is an unquestionable necessity)

Directors' assent structures DIR-2 and DIR-8.

INC-7, INC-22 and DIR-12.

[invisibleicewands]

Please come and see me because I’ll be dead soon’: how Michael Sheen got sucked into a forever chemicals exposé

An opera-loving member of high society turned eco-activist who was forced into police protection with a panic button round his neck. A Hollywood actor who recorded said activist’s life story as he was dying from exposure to the very chemicals he was investigating. Throw in two investigative journalists who realise not everything is as it seems, then uncover some startling truths, and you have “podcasting’s strangest team” on Buried: The Last Witness.

On their award-winning 2023 podcast Buried, the husband and wife duo Dan Ashby and Lucy Taylor dug into illegal toxic waste dumping in the UK and its links to organised crime. This time, they focus on “forever chemicals”, specifically polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and set out to discover whether one whistleblower may have been decades ahead of his time in reporting on their harmful impact.

“It’s amazing how big the scale of this story is,” says Ashby, as we sit backstage at the Crucible theatre, where they are doing a live discussion as part of Sheffield DocFest. “With this series, we don’t just want it to make your blood turn cold, we want it to make you question your own blood itself.”

It all started when Taylor and Ashby were sent a lead about the work of former farmer’s representative Douglas Gowan. In 1967, he discovered a deformed calf in a field and began to investigate strange goings on with animals close to the Brofiscin and Maendy quarries in south Wales. He linked them to the dumping of waste by companies including the nearby Monsanto chemical plant, which was producing PCBs.

PCBs were used in products such as paint and paper to act as a fire retardant, but they were discovered to be harmful and have been banned since 1981 in the UK. However, due to their inability to break down – hence the term forever chemical – Gowan predicted their legacy would be a troubling one. “I expect there to be a raft of chronic illness,” he said. He even claimed that his own exposure to PCBs (a result of years of testing polluted grounds) led his pancreas and immune system to stop working. “I’m a mess and I think it can all be attributed to PCBs,” he said.

However, Gowan wasn’t a typical environmentalist. “A blue-blood high-society Tory and a trained lawyer who could out-Mozart anyone,” is how Taylor describes him in the series. He would even borrow helicopters from friends in high places to travel to investigate farmers’ fields. Gowan died in 2018 but the pair managed to get hold of his life’s work – confidential reports, testing and years of evidence. “I’m interested in environmental heroes that aren’t cliche,” says Ashby. “So I was fascinated by him. But then we started to see his flaws and really had to weigh them up. My goodness it’s a murky world we went into.”

The reason they were able to delve even deeper into this murky world is because of the award-winning actor Michael Sheen who, in 2017, came across Gowan’s work in a story he read. He was so blown away by it, and the lack of broader coverage, that he tracked him down. “I got a message back from him saying: ‘Please come and see me because I’ll be dead soon,’” says Sheen. “I took a camera with me and spent a couple of days with him and just heard this extraordinary story.”

What Gowan had been trying to prove for years gained some traction in 2007, with pieces in the Ecologist and a Guardian article exploring how “Monsanto helped to create one of the most contaminated sites in Britain”. One was described as smelling “of sick when it rains and the small brook that flows from it gushes a vivid orange.” But then momentum stalled.

Years later, in 2023, Ashby and Taylor stumbled on a recording of Sheen giving the 2017 Raymond Williams memorial lecture, which referenced Gowan and his work. Before they knew it, they were in the actor’s kitchen drinking tea and learning he had conducted a life-spanning seven-hour interview with Gowan before his death. So they joined forces. Sheen isn’t just a token celebrity name added for clout on this podcast; he is invested. For him, it’s personal as well as political. “Once you dig into it, you realise there’s a pattern,” he says. “All the places where this seems to have happened are poor working-class areas. There’s a sense that areas like the one I come from are being exploited.”

Sheen even goes to visit some contaminated sites in the series, coming away from one feeling sick. “That made it very real,” he says. “To be looking into a field and going: ‘Well, I’m pretty sure that’s toxic waste.’” Sheen was living a double life of sorts. “I went to rehearsals for a play on Monday and people were like, ‘What did you do this weekend?’” he says. “‘Oh, I went to the most contaminated area in the UK and I think I may be poisoned.’ People thought I was joking.” Sheen ended up being OK, but did have some temporary headaches and nausea, which was a worry. “We literally had to work out if we had poisoned Michael Sheen,” says Ashby, who also ponders in the series: “Have I just killed a national treasure?”

The story gets even knottier. Gowan’s findings turn out to be accurate and prescient, but the narrative around his journey gets muddy. As a character with a flair for drama, he turned his investigation into a juicy, riveting story filled with action, which could not always be corroborated. “If he hadn’t done that, and if he’d been a nerdy, analytical, detail-oriented person who just presented the scientific reports and kept them neatly filed, would we have made this podcast?” asks Taylor, which is a fascinating question that runs through this excellent and gripping series.

Ashby feels that Gowan understood how vital storytelling is when it comes to cutting through the noise. “We have so much science proving the scale of these problems we face and yet we don’t seem to have the stories,” he says. “I think Douglas got that. Fundamentally, he understood that stories motivate human beings to act. But then he went too far.”

However, this is not purely about Gowan’s story – it’s about evidence. The Last Witness doubles up as a groundbreaking investigation into the long-lasting impact of PCBs. “We threw the kitchen sink at this,” says Ashby. “The breakthrough for us is that the Royal Society of Chemistry came on board and funded incredibly expensive testing. So we have this commitment to go after the truth in a way that is hardly ever done.”

From shop-bought fish so toxic that it breaches official health advice to off-the-scale levels of banned chemicals found in British soil, the results are staggering. “The scientist almost fell off his chair,” says Ashby. “That reading is the highest he has ever recorded in soil – in the world. That was the moment we knew Douglas was right and we are now realising the scale of this problem. The public doesn’t realise that even a chemical that has been banned for 40 years is still really present in our environment.”

To go even deeper into just how far PCBs have got into our environment and food chain, Ashby and Taylor had their own blood tested. When Taylor found 80 different types of toxic PCB chemicals in her blood it was a sobering moment. “I was genuinely emotional because it’s so personal,” she says. “It was the thought of this thing being in me that was banned before I was even born and the thought of passing that on to my children.” Ashby adds: “We’ve managed physical risk in our life as journalists in Tanzania and with organised crime, but more scary than a gangster is this invisible threat to our health.”

In order to gauge the magnitude of what overexposure to PCBs can do, they headed to Anniston, Alabama, once home to a Monsanto factory. “As a journalist, you have an inbuilt scepticism and think it can’t be that bad,” says Ashby. “But when I got there I couldn’t believe what I was seeing. I hate to use words like dystopian, but it was. There is a whole massive school that can’t be used. There’s illnesses in children and cancers. It truly was the most powerful vignette of the worst-case example of these chemicals.”

It’s bleak stuff but instilling fear and panic is not the intention. “Obviously, we’re really concerned about it,” says Ashby. “And although the environmental crises we face do feel overwhelming, it is incredible how a movement has formed and how individuals are taking action in communities. The lesson to take from Douglas is that the response doesn’t have to be resignation. It can be agency.”

[headspace-hotel]

Researching herbicide resistance in weeds.

A decade ago, everyone said rotating applications of different herbicides was key to stopping herbicide resistance.

Then, around 2015, evidence from a large study emerged saying that this actually causes weeds to be MORE resistant, so the best thing to do is to spray a combination of multiple herbicides mixed together at once.

Now that is being called into question too. Whoda thunk it...

Herbicide resistance among weeds is only getting stronger. Recently, scientists found an annual bluegrass (Poa annua) on a golf course that was resistant to seven herbicide modes of action at once. Seven. SEVEN. Amaranth plants been found with resistance to six herbicide modes of action at once. Twenty years ago, the narrative was that resistance to glyphosate (Roundup) was unlikely to become widespread; today it's the second-most common type of resistance.

What's more, plants are developing types of herbicide resistance that are effective against multiple herbicides at once and harder to detect. Instead of changing the chemical processes within them that are affected by the herbicides so the herbicides don't work as well, they're changing the way they absorb chemicals in the first place. Resistant plants are producing enzymes that detoxify the herbicides before they even enter the plants' cells.

It took Monsanto ten years to develop crop varieties resistant to Dicamba (after weeds made 'Roundup Ready' crops pointless). Palmer amaranth evolved Dicamba resistance in five years.

So I asked, "Why are all the proposed solutions dependent on using more herbicides, when we know damn well that this is going to do nothing but make the weeds evolve faster?"

The answer is that chemical companies have the world in a death grip. They can't make money off non-chemical solutions, so chemical solutions get all the funding, research, and outreach to farmers.

But why do chemical companies have so much power?

One of the biggest reasons is the U.S. military.

In the Vietnam war, all of Vietnam was sprayed with toxic herbicides like Agent Orange, which was incredibly toxic to humans and affected the Vietnamese population with horrible illnesses and birth defects. Monsanto, the company that made the herbicides, knew that it did this, but didn't tell anyone. The US government didn't admit that they'd poisoned humans on a mass scale until Vietnam veterans started dying and coming down with horrible illnesses, and even then, it took them 40 years. (My Papaw died at 60 because of that stuff.) And the soldiers weren't there for very long. As for the Vietnamese people, the soil and water where they live is contaminated.

Similarly, during the "war on drugs," the US military sprayed Roundup and other chemicals on fields to destroy coca plants and other plants used in the manufacturing of drugs. This killed a lot of crops that farmers needed to live, and caused major health problems in places such as Columbia. The US government said that people getting sick were lying and that Roundup was just as safe as table salt. (A statement that did not age well.)

So chemical companies make money off arming the USA military. The American lawn care industry, and the agricultural system, therefore originates in more than one way from the United States's war-mongering.

The other major way is described in this article (which I highly recommend), which describes how after WW2, chemical plants used for manufacturing explosives were changed into fertilizer producing plants, but chemical companies couldn't market all that fertilizer to farmers, so they invented the lawn care industry. No exaggeration, that's literally what happened.

This really changes my perspective on all the writings about fixing the agricultural system. The resources are biased towards the use of chemicals in agriculture because the companies are so powerful as to make outreach and research for non-chemical methods of agriculture really hard to fund. All the funding is in finding new ways to spray chemicals or spraying slightly different chemicals, because that's what you can actually get ahold of money to look into. It is like the research has to negotiate a truce with the chemical companies, suggesting only solutions that won't cause lower profits.

Meanwhile my respect for Amaranth is skyrocketing.

Who would win: The USA military-industrial complex or one leafy boi