At this point, any book I read makes me think of Usopp. And this time it results in another Water 7 point I want to make
I understand that One Piece is a shonen series, so certain themes are expected. But when I reflect on Usopp's struggles during Water 7, it bothers me how people still defend Zoro’s words as if they were absolute. Zoro’s beliefs weren’t entirely safe or right. Water 7 touched heavily on themes of manhood, which many Usopp fans have pointed out, especially regarding his relationship with Franky. But when you dig deeper, Usopp deserves more grace and consideration.
Despite what Sanji and Franky did for him, it wasn’t enough. Usopp didn’t have a father figure to help him build the self-confidence every boy—or anyone—needs. Sons often get their self-confidence from their fathers, and without that, Usopp was left to suppress his emotions and internalize his pain. So when people in the fandom argue that Usopp was wrong and shouldn’t have let his “pride” get in the way, it feels unfair. It goes back to the issue of suppressed emotions, which is incredibly damaging without a positive outlet—a skill Usopp was never taught or able to explore.
I also think Usopp might’ve learned the wrong lesson from Water 7, especially when the fandom considers what was “right” as actually being morally wrong. I came across someone’s interpretation of Usopp’s fight with Luffy, and while I didn’t agree with most of their negativity, I did see their point about the “might is always right” mentality that Zoro seemed to push. This mentality, according to the commenter, stripped Usopp of the little confidence he had left by Water 7, along with the autonomy and moral compass that were truly his own, even if they were chaotic and unconventional.
So it really bothers me when people view Usopp’s stance as disloyalty. In reality, it showed that he wasn’t willing to blindly follow others—he believed everyone deserved an explanation, including himself. In that light, Usopp’s apology after Enies Lobby feels underserved because it doesn’t validate the struggles he went through or extend beyond the surface-level support he received before.
read more: what was the point of this post?
37 notes
·
View notes
theres a post going around that says usopp is sanjis narrative foil and i would agree with that. and on twitter mango said oh it applies to all five of them. as an expert in writing all five of them going by the definition on Wikipedia i would agree. like hello?
this is literally The Reason i think writing all five of them is more articulate than writing a two person pairing is because their characters are all uniquely highlighted in their 4 relationships. they become more of a person the more they interact with eachother because oda uses their 4 relationships to highlight the different people they are to eachother and therefore they become more of a human being to the audience and not overly static.
8 notes
·
View notes
JJK SPOILERS!!!
The new chapter reminded me again why I can no longer be satisfied with Shounen.
Gojo's dead and people think Itadori has a chance to kill both Sukuna and Kenjaku....
"We can now see who's the main character" (ნიშნისმოგებით, თან) cuz Gojo was "in the way of the story" and "story couldn't progress with him in it."
Yeah, if Itadori randomly gets an upgrate out of thin fucking air, when he doesn't even have a innate technique - "but he is gonna develop Sukuna's CT". — How the fuck is he developing anything if Sukuna is no longer in his body but in Megumi's?? You are BORN with innate technique!! Unless Sukuna goes back inhabiting Itadori's body, Yuji isn't developing anything (unless Gege pulls out some residual cursed energy leftover bullshit — i.e. powerup out of blue sky).
As a writer myself, I don't really understand why some people (especially Sukuna's die hard fans) don't get it how killing of Gojo Satoru OFF SCREEN is bad writing so I'm gonna explain (and rant) here.
Okay, pals, sit down, we are having a lecture in basics!
"How to become good at Writing 101" states that the writer can write story in TWO main ways: 1) is called "tell" and 2) is called "show".
Every single writer and critic from centuries ago to today can confidently say that writer using "tell" is one of the weaker writing choice. Let's compare simple examples.
1) "He died." — this here is "tell". Nothing happened, it's boring.
2) "He felt fatigued, he eyes could no longer focuse on the scene in front of him. The sound of blood rushing in his ears was defeating.. To draw air in his lungs was becoming harder and harder as time went on..." etc — this is "show".
Of course death can come instantly but as a doctor (by profession) I can assure you that human brain even after being decapitated can remine "alive" for few seconds/minutes, can understand commans, can open eyes, can look at someone who is talking to them, etc..
Even Gojo looking down at himself, while he was being cut in two, would have been enough "showing".
But to have another character, in this case, Sukuna, explain i.e. "tell" how Gojo died is exactly how it sounds — "tell".
In every literature: classic books, modern books, manga, etc, "tell" is considered weak writing style and it seems even Gege is bound to it for now.
Also, what was the point of unsealing Gojo if he had to still die in the end? Him remining sealed would make no difference in the story - Sukuna vs Kashimo would still happen and now that Sukuna has "adapted" to Infinity means absulutely nothing, cuz nobody is using Infinity in the manga anymore for him to cut "space".
In fact Gege just replaced Gojo with Sukuna as overpowered character and we can see that he hated Gojo solely based on how "strongest" he was (and on his attitude) and how he couldn't kill him.
And how he handled his overpowered character? Killed him off screen. So how's Sukuna dying now? Also getting off screened??
And Gojo died with no regrets, apparently. His pseudo-son has fried brain, his sister and his speudo-dad are dead (at his own hands (even if Sukuna is using them)), most of his shikigami are gone, and Sukuna is parading around using him as "meat suit" — that should, at the very least, still be Gojo's regret (not saving Megumi) but, no, apparently Gojo is selfish bastard who doesn't care about anything and he is glad that he died (even after not acomplishing anything at all), but just mad that Sukuna didn't go all out???
Talk about anti climatic.
Gojo dying like this is kinda giving Madara and Kishimoto and I do not like that (I don't think anybody does)...
This is why I can't deal with Shounen anymore, because no matter what, at some point story telling gets inconstintent and I better stick with Seinen, cuz story there makes more sense.
Thank you for reading this rant and Sukuna-stans don't interact, cuz I'm blocking you all, if I see one word about "coping" or whatever.
(თქვენი თავი ნაღდად არ მაქვს და დიდი ალბათობით, შემდეგი თავის მერე ამ მანგასაც მივაგდებ).
27 notes
·
View notes
!!!(beware spoiler)!!!
Yes, I’m glad the One Piece live-action series is getting a second season. But I hope they don’t get to Water 7. Someone I was talking to thinks they’ll get to Marineford 😒 . . . But anyway, I don’t want to see Jacob Romero Gibson get his butt kicked or jumped. Yes. It’s acting so he isn’t really getting beat up but . . .I could barely take Usopp getting jumped and beat up in the manga/anime.
Therefore, I want the live-action to excel, but. . .if it were to somehow not reach Water 7, I’d be okay with that. Because if people already constantly get things wrong about Usopp’s actions in Water 7/Enies Lobby, then the live action will probably most likely further increase that misunderstanding since the others can apparently do no wrong. Especially since they’ve downplayed Usopp completely in the live-action. If they mess up him up again in season 2, then the future looks bleak for live-action Usopp. So, yeah. My completely un-biased , non-bitter, hopeful, and rational thoughts. . . 😒
9 notes
·
View notes