#liberal white women

[religion-is-a-mental-illness]

When you've been fed, and absorbed, the mythology that you're an eternal victim of a world that is conspiring against you, of course you're going to be depressed.

Funny how the most woke white people, who supposedly have "privilege," are more mentally ill than everybody who's supposedly "oppressed" by nebulous forces.

"You can't be more offended than the victim." -- Bill Maher

[coldheartarcade]

[zegalba]

"Women at the Palestine Liberation Organization training camp learn with Al-Fatah. Location: Jordan."

Photographed by Leif Skoogfors (1968)

[alwaysbewoke]

[goldstarrgrl]

nicholas galitzine’s filmography is truly one of the funniest things i’ve ever seen because it literally goes

1. heartbreaking gay coming of age film

2. cinderella jukebox musical

3. military propaganda

4. gay romcom

5. lesbian fight club film

[pocketsizedquasar-3]

i mean, we knew this. but the fact that i’ve seen dozens and dozens of post focusing on queer ppl and telling queer ppl to take care of themselves and queer ppl that it’ll be ok and queer ppl to not kill themselves (which, not saying not to make those posts or that those posts are bad), and not a single, single post* checking in on or showing compassion to Black people, undocumented people and other immigrants, brown people, Muslims, Jews, or other religious minorities — basically, any and all POC in general** — is truly, truly emblematic of what we have known all along: white people fundamentally do not see oppression if it is not happening to them.

*the one or two exceptions were posts i saw before the elections, reminding Black&brown folks to stay safe (bc regardless of outcome, racist hate crimes spike around elections!), and the OPs of those were, predictably, themselves Black or brown.

**QTPOC of course exist. we exist especially at the most dangerous intersections of this violence & horrid effects to our health, mental and physical. but it is frequently clear when ppl make posts like this and consider none of the harm which we are subject to, only that which also affects them.

it does not occur to you to show compassion to us. it does not occur to you to show solidarity with us. it does not occur to you that we are in danger, and have been in far more danger than you, regardless of which color they slap on the white house. it does not occur to you that when you talk about violence against queer people, the vast majority of that violence will fall upon queer and trans POC, especially Black queer people. it does not occur to you that QTPOC exist at all, except when we can be used as a hypothetical argument.

white queer people are white before they are queer. white trans people are white before they are trans. white women are white before they are women. they are disappointed in the status quo only when it stops supporting them. they are aghast and appalled when they are treated like those people. they are shocked and disappointed when suddenly their whiteness no longer insulates them from being treated the way the rest of us are treated. baldwin of course said it first and best:

I think white gay people feel cheated because they were born, in principle, into a society in which they were supposed to be safe. The anomaly of their sexuality puts them in danger, unexpectedly. Their reaction seems to me in direct proportion to the sense of feeling cheated of the advantages which accrue to white people in a white society. There's an element, it has always seemed to me, of bewilderment and complaint.

white queer people, white people in the imperial core, are experiencing a fraction of the dread and violence that everyone else has been subjected to for years. you are afraid, rightfully so. but in your fear and your rage and whatever else, you do not look to those of us who have been fighting this violence for years. you do not offer us compassion and care the way you do with white ppl. you, of course, fall back on your whiteness.

again, none of this is new. we know this. we’ve known this. but it is frustrating nonetheless.

it does not occur to you that we are in danger. that we are dying. that we are being killed. it does not occur to you to to offer us the same hotlines and resources and reassurances and kindness and compassion.

keeping rbs on for now but if people start being weird i’m turning them off. don’t put words in my mouth. don’t say i said something i didn’t. i meant what i said and nothing else.

[galactic-rhea]

It's ranting hours sunday for me: Y' know, I think when people complain soooo much about Padmé getting with Anakin, they're failing to see a lot of things. BUT ESPECIALLY...That it was her choice, and if speaks a lot of her character and personality.

She was already done dirty by the movies by getting so many deleted scenes, but then if you try to take away the agency she had on marrying a human disaster or her choices, like her forgiveness/understanding, it's actually undermining and flattening her character.

The fact is that she's actually very similar to Anakin, she's stubborn, deeply traumatized, compromises a lot for the sake of others and loves beyond reasoning. We, the audience, know that Anakin will become Darth Vader and one of the most iconic villains of history; so everything he does can be seem as a red flag that really isn't there.

From Padmé's POV, Anakin has done terrible things, but it's capable of incredible acts of love and compassion. They're in circumstances that aren't normal at all, she was queen at 14, and he was born a slave and joined the space wizard monks and his normal is kill or be killed. Our modern and omniscient POV can't be applied onto them because there's no point of comparison in this sci-fi-shakespearen tragedy-soap-opera-fantasy.

Besides...she was actually right in the end, and I don't believe is "feminist" or progressive to take away a big part of her core personality, that actually had repercussions in the whole story, and make her out to be either unaware and naive of marrying a monster, or (the worst one, imo) being jedi-mind-tricked-brainwashed-abused by her husband.

The "right, correct, girlboss and queen" actitude does more damage than help, leave Padmé to be a person. A person who wanted to have a fairytale romance with some guy who would fight for her and makes her laugh.

Also, the hell why you wanna blame her for something Anakin does, come on. That's a whole other can of worms, though. My point is, that trying to avoid or re-work-or re-contextualize the fact that she chose Anakin despite him literally telling her about murdering a whole village, is actually changing a big chunk of her personality traits.

She was a child queen, then a politician at the edge of an inminent war, manipulated by the same guy that groomed Anakin into a massive murderer, saw her people being taken into camps, had assasination attempts weekly and had to rip off of her individualism by becoming a public figure, giving up her sense of being a person by having several almost identical decoys, she had to stop being just Padmé to be Queen and then Senator Amidala and she did all of that showing little to no emotion.

Then Anakin does all what she herself had to rip off of her in order to be a politician: Honest, passionate, and able to show emotions; like love or anger.

She has morals and she represents democracy and justice, in a way. But I fully believe that inside her she had the same passionate anger and love capable of burning the galaxy that we know Anakin had, which makes them different sides of the same coin, and I think she realized that. Anakin perhaps didn't , as he never stopped of seeing himself as a slave and therefore inferior, whereas he held Padmé very highly, but I think Padmé saw them both as equals. She didn't have a "I can fix him" mentality, she had a "We're the same, we're both lonely, confused, hurting and scared of losing everything. And if he's like me, then I know he can do the right thing for love."

In other words: She was as insane as her husband, she only seems normal because she wasn't put into the monk warrior order and groomed by the devil for over a decade. (And I don't mean insane as, 'she's crazy for loving a murderer' harley quinn style, I just meant it on a daring, hopeless romantic and tenacious way)

[afriblaq]

Trump just went back and snatched a policy from 1965—but he’s not racist?

Let’s be clear: undoing a 60-year-old policy designed to address America’s racial inequities IS racist. This isn’t just about politics; this is about erasing protections that ensured fair opportunities for Black people, women, and other marginalized communities.

This is the door to companies not even notifying people of other races about promotions and opportunities. They dress it up with buzzwords to distract you from what they’re really doing. Don’t be fooled.

If you’re talking about this, make it plain. Too often, we assume people know the history and implications, but they count on us not connecting the dots. They rely on our silence.

Why do I always speak on race? Because I knew how quickly they’d try to take away progress if we weren’t vocal, active, and strategic. If we don’t have leaders who are willing to speak up and fight back, policies like this will dismantle decades of hard-fought progress.

This move directly harms the economic progress of Black people, and if you think it stops here, you’re mistaken.

garychambersjr

[mrskennedy]

President John F. Kennedy and First Lady Jacqueline Kennedy arrive at a White House reception in honor of the federal judiciary. November 20th, 1963.

This was Jackie’s first official public appearance following the death of her son Patrick. It would also end up being the couples last event held at the White House.

[modern-passions]

New Year's Resolution for white girls: swear off whitebois, get blacked, never go back.

[averlym]

fairest of the fair

[pinbones]

There's two types of people who use transandrophobia to decribe transmascs' and trans mens' experiences:

- Simply specificity, language used to hone in on a specific way being trans affects people who just happen to be men

- As both the above and as a springboard to discuss how societal misogyny, radical feminism, gender stereotypes, and bioessentalism affect all people who can be pecieved as men or masculine by others, and how bigotries compound in meaningful ways with stereotypes and bigotry surrounding maleness and manhood

Like. Half of you are saying "maleness is a hollow experience which is standard, and exists in opposition to gendered oppression, and transandrophobia is therefore when dudes experience misogyny and transphobia"

and half of you are saying "Being percieved and/or transitioning towards male uniquely affects how I am treated, because, for example, how people perceive my blackness or mental illness or kinkiness or femininity is compounded with my manhood in ways that don't usually happen to gender conforming cisperi women"

Which are two fundamentally different approaches to transandrophobia as a concept. One suggests that maleness is a simple downy layer of privilege that coats a person through their male life, and the other acknowledges that a man (or somebody perceived as masculine/male) can experience oppression in ways that those NOT perceived male may not.

Only one of these interpretations is intersectional. Black individuals who are policed more hashly when interpreted as masc know they are risking dangerous experiences when transitioning to male, as has been discussed before on here (to no avail). Male or percieved male people with personality disorders are treated as more dangerous than women with similar symptoms, and are sometiems diagnosed with different disorders entirely based on percieved gender differences. This affects transmascs too, especially considering the already dire state of queerness in psychiatric institutions. Being a male birthing parent is a whole shitshow of transphobia because men are not supposed to give birth, and transmascs are lucky to access related healthcare at all, let alone access it without being ceaselessly misgendered and treated as a stigmatised 'other' to deleterious affects on parent and baby. These are just a few examples, there are many more ways maleness can screw a person over. And that's not to say that female privilege is a thing instead of male privilege, but rather to emphasise that men are not supposed to be minorities. Men are not supposed to be assaulted, men are not supposed to be outliers, men are absolutely not supposed to be trans.

When a man is autistic, he's not just autistic, he's an autistic male, and that makes him more likely to be killed by cops (especially if black). When someone says "you claim you're not ableist but you're scared of the homeless x on a bus talking to xself", they always say the person is a man, because that sounds more significant (and cops think so too). Consider when a person's rape/abuse is considered to not be all that serious due to the victim being male, or when a man's attraction is considered to be more exploitative than a woman's, or when a fat man is considered more creepy/sexist than a thin man or a fat woman. Consider why so many caricatures of evil and creepiness are men with deformities. Consider the fact that men's bathrooms don't have baby changing tables, and that a man may get less support from others after their child's death than the mother might. Maleness can negatively compound with things like minority status, vulnerability, aggression, sexuality, etc. in ways that screw that person over, both in social spaces (such as queer communities that dislike/distrust maleness and masculinity, or how isolation affects men harder), and in more tangible ways, like their rates of suicide and being murdered.

There are tangible ways in which transitioning to male can negatively affect a person's life even if you remove (hypothetically, not really possible) the transphobia element, and these also constitute as worthwhile topics of discussion. If you think maleness is the lack of gendered oppression, then you're not intersectional in your feminism at all. If your life as a male is genuinely sunshine and rainbows (apart from the transphobia if trans), then good for you, genuinely that's great, but not everyone lives in a radfem fantasy world.

Being unable to tell the difference between men talking about mens issues/liberation, and right wingers talking about oppressing women more, isn't feminist. It's ignorant and antifeminist. (MRAs don't care about actual mens lib, and are actively worsening it because they are sexist and opposed to gender lib. You guys know that, right? That male and female liberation aren't oppositional or binary, but the same gender liberation that is entirely oppositional to patriarchy?)

These men and mascs talking about issues facing men aren't ignorant womanhaters who deny misogyny and want ultraprivileged men to be coddled, they are good faith members of your community with experiences just as varied and valid as yours. Treat them like it.

[womendeservehumanity]

Saw this on tumblr but op had their reblogs off. I had to put my two cents in I’m sorryyy. The cognitive dissonance, buzz words, and pure cope so many leftist “feminists” inject in their veins daily in hopes that they’ll find their unicorn man who’s a leftist feminist king who reads theory to her as if most of these leftist men aren’t former alt right edgelords who realized that capitalism harms them because they’re lower class. Completely leaving feminism out of their politics because they still hate women like their 13 year old selves.

Also her saying that speaking on fgm “too much” is a dog whistle for transphobia and and an “alt right pipeline” because it borders too much on the idea that women and girls face sex based oppression. All while using women in the global south as a taking point later on in the video. But no actually you can’t speak on something that disproportionately affects them because it might hurt people with penises feelings because you’re not making it about them all the fucking time.

Also just wanted to show some of the “comrades” that are unsurprisingly endorsing this:

All I can say is LOL

And just a personal gripe… why are so many (white) leftists so egotistical 😭 “revolutionary leftist” who do you think you are my lordddd. Really, truly they’re politically homeless in most facets and just grasp on to general ideas and concepts within leftism to feel intelligent and interesting. Like they don’t actually care about what any of this means and its purpose. it’s just sort of a fun quirk. “Hey I know about these things. I’m on a higher level of consciousness than libs. I am so smart” but don’t actually care all that much about applying it beyond owning people on tiktok.

[itisiives]

Lol, she filed a fraudulent report to ICE. I knew she was one of those types to turn on the white woman tears for the police!

[blonkk]

to women being inspired by bursts of emotion rather than genuine curiosity and hunger for knowledge: read. put down your phone. get off tiktok, twitter, ig, youtube. go to the library, get on an archive and read. read feminist theory that isn’t from an influencer or a self-proclaimed “video essayist” or even your university’s “gender studies” prof. read feminist history. read articles that challenge your confirmation bias. read kate millet, catherine mckinnon, dworkin, valerie solanas, betty friedan, angela davis, nawal el sadaawi, judith butler….read shit that makes you uncomfortable. work through why you’re opposed to reading certain feminist thinkers and then read their stuff.

just read the material and then make your own decisions about what you believe. enough of this dime-store feminism. feminism isn’t an identity, it’s not a passive way to state that you care about women’s rights. it’s something that requires real action to be a true part of. most women who think they are aren’t actually feminists. they barely even understand it’s core tenets. if you want to be one that does, and maybe even take some legitimate feminist action, then commit to learning the hard way.

you can’t be an effective activist without action. you can’t understand a movement or theory without undertaking the necessary research and analysis and challenging your preconceptions.

it’s gonna make you question things. it’s gonna turn your stomach, and put you on the defensive, and force you to admit that some of your actions and beliefs are actually not at all feminist, and many may even be anti-feminist/woman. no one’s saying you have to observe and change everything about yourself, but for fuck’s sakes stop calling yourself something you’re not. it’s an obstruction of truth and insulting to women in the movement doing the real work.

[hussyknee]

Whenever the white left screams about "purity politics getting in the way of leftist progress/ class consciousness" it usually means that either Black or brown or disabled people objected to being thrown under the bus and told to suck it up. When pressed they will then invoke "two things can be true at once", like we don't know they're using the truth they like to actively erase and suppress the one inconvenient to them.

Your class system is built on colonization and eugenics. Prioritize race and disability in your leftism or die in a ditch for all we care. You are and have always been unnecessary and obstructive to our liberation.