#empathy deficit

[wherepond]

Blackhawk - American Eagle collision

500-hour Black Hawk H-60 pilot, Rebecca Lobach, failed to see & avoid American Eagle 5342

Michael 'Rocket' Blackstone, a 43 year pilot, 26 year airline pilot, and aerobatic performer and stunt pilot describes what he feels to be the likely causes of the unthinkable....a midair collision between a military H-60 and an airliner.

This is the first midair collision on US soil since the Aeromexico crash in Southern California in 1986 - some 38 year ago. 

The likely causes are now pointing toward the 28 year old female pilot, Captain Rebecca Lobach who was at the controls of the H-60 with only 500 hours of flight time was allegedly  taking a competency check ride with Chief Warrent Officer Andrew Eaves, 39 was evaluating her had only 1,000 hours. 

The pair failed to see and avoid traffic called out by Washington Tower after stating that they had the traffic in sight.

Clearly the H-60 crew did not have the traffic in sight, failed to fly at or below the required 200' altitude on the route, and are the likely cause of 67 people to lose their lives.

My heart and prayers go out to everyone involved in this horrible aviation tragedy. May this never happen again.

"UPDATE: DCA mid-air Black Hawk & AA 5342 My latest thoughts, Army & ATC training failures likely"

[insightfultake]

Is the Digital Age Eroding Our Social Skills? The Hidden Cost of Hyper-Connectivity

In an era where a single tweet can spark a global movement and a video call can bridge continents, the world has never felt smaller. Yet, as we become more digitally connected, a pressing question emerges: Are we losing the art of genuine human connection? With over 5.18 billion internet users and 4.8 billion active social media users worldwide, as reported by DataReportal in 2023, the digital revolution has undeniably transformed how we communicate. But beneath the surface of this hyper-connected world lies a growing concern—the erosion of traditional social skills. This insightful article explores the impact of digital connectivity on our ability to interact meaningfully, backed by research, data, and expert insights, and offers actionable steps to reclaim the human touch in an increasingly virtual world.

[xokp]

The Vertigo of Power: Empathy, Gaslighting, and the Fight for Reality

I would like to think that if I had the good fortune to acquire billions of power coupons (dollars), I would live a comfortable life, but I would also make sure as many people around me as possible lived comfortably. I think a lot of us would. That’s why some of us can’t fathom the evil that drives men like Trump and Musk. Most of us, if given such power and influence, would help people, and we…

[redtail-lol]

Empathy thoughts: low empathy/no empathy/empathy impairments vs empathy deficits and how they affect people differently (and why I think this contributes to the stigma against low empathy, no empathy, and empathy impairments.)

Having an empathy impairment, such as low empathy or no empathy, is a chronic symptom most commonly present with other mental disabilities, and it's mostly an across the board type of thing. It can be conditional, based on mood, personal connection, or other personal factors, but isn't discriminatory (ie, you don't only feel empathy for people who are white). However, it doesn't have to be, and can be just general weak or non-existent empathy.

An empathy impairment occurs in someone who usually has empathy, mostly pertaining to people with average or high empathy but can apply to people with low but not no empathy. Empathy deficits are when something causes someone else to not feel empathy in a moment when in different circumstances, they would have. This can be due to online interaction (because parts of empathy are from analyzing facial expressions, body language, and tone of voice, which are lost), due to not being able to fathom the situation and understand the feelings, and can be discriminatory. This sort of deficit might cause dehumanization, or it might be due to dehumanization. Honestly I think it's a sort of circular type thing/both, depending on the circumstance. In an online setting, it's causal. Text isn't a person, the empathy can't function, so there is dehumanization of the other user. But in a discriminatory situation, a person's prejudices cause them to subconsciously dehumanize the other first, and that prevents them from feeling empathy, then because the empathy isn't present, they will then consciously dehumanize them because they've adapted their sense of humanity around empathy. Unlike someone with an empathy impairment, who would have always lacked empathy and developed their sense of what humanity is, other people's humanity, and their ability to feel without empathy, people experiencing an empathy deficit have empathy as a central part of their understanding of other people's humanity and ability to feel. When they lack empathy for someone else, they then interpret the lack of feeling as "that other person must not be feeling anything." If you can't be empathized with, then for someone who isn't adapted to not feeling empathy, then you mustn't be human. We see empathy deficits often. Rich people can sleep at night off the exploitation of others below them because they dehumanize those below them, stop feeling empathy, stop caring, and further dehumanize them based on that lack of empathy. Racists dehumanize people of color and compare them to animals and treat them like a separate species because their prejudice has made them subconsciously dehumanize them, and then it's a cycle of selective lack of empathy causing dehumanization, and the dehumanization further causing the selective lack of empathy. Misogynists dehumanize women and other them, treating them like they have different brains, different capacity for feeling, and are lesser people because their prejudice and ingrained patriarchal feelings have made them again subconsciously dehumanize women and then feel less empathy for them than they do for their fellow men. The list goes on. And when it isn't based on prejudice, it can still be discriminatory. Take autistics for example. Our body language, tone, facial expressions, and lack of eye contact can make it difficult for a neurotypical person to empathize with us, and then that causes dehumanization. They assume we are cold and unfeeling, because they cannot feel with us accurately.

I think this is why people have misconceptions about low empathy people. They know how they act and feel when they don't experience empathy for someone, and assume that everyone without empathy has the same experience as they do when they experience a deficit. But what they don't realize is that much of the reason they feel that way when they lack empathy is because they usually feel it. For us with consistent impairment, not selective deficit, we do not rely on it. Yes the lack can be disabling, because we can't tell what our peers feel, and we're expected to. It can cause accidental rudeness and insensitivity. But it doesn't cause dehumanization, because our sense of humanity isn't empathy based. Our knowledge of other people's feelings is "they exist and I know this because it's obvious, but I can never feel them." For someone who can usually sense them, it kinda makes sense that a selective instance of not doing so would cause a flawed interpretation that it means they aren't feeling anything instead of understanding they just can't get a reading. Obviously that isn't a defense of prejudice, the prejudice comes before the empathy deficit and causes it, not the other way around. And it's a misunderstanding of empathy that causes people to make these misinterpretations as validation of those prejudices instead of knowing that they're wrong and their empathy is flawed because they're bad people. But us, we know the feelings exist without feeling them, and we know everyone is human without any sort of feelings of empathy. That's why people are wrong when they think we're more prone to being excessively cruel just for fun. We have adapted to the long term feeling of lacking empathy, and they haven't.

[maddyjones2]

People who can recognize pain in themselves are rarely able to recognize pain in their animals.

Animal abuse is rarely a bad man with a big stick beating his pet.

Animal abuse is usually a perfectly normal person not knowing enough to give their pet proper care.

Or not caring enough to learn.

[drcpanda12]

New Post has been published on https://www.knewtoday.net/exploring-the-unique-behaviors-of-criminals-insights-from-psychology/

Exploring the Unique Behaviors of Criminals: Insights from Psychology

Understanding the unique behaviors exhibited by criminals is a topic of great interest in the field of psychology. Criminal behavior encompasses a wide range of activities, from petty theft to violent offenses, and delving into the psychological aspects can shed light on the underlying factors that contribute to criminality. By examining these unique behaviors, psychologists aim to develop a deeper understanding of the psychological processes at play and identify potential interventions to prevent and address criminal behavior.

Criminal behavior is a complex phenomenon influenced by various factors, including individual characteristics, social dynamics, and environmental influences. While not all individuals who exhibit certain behaviors are criminals, certain patterns and traits have been consistently observed among those involved in criminal activities. These unique behaviors offer valuable insights into the psychological makeup of criminals and can guide researchers, law enforcement agencies, and policymakers in developing effective strategies for crime prevention and intervention.

This article will delve into some of the key unique behaviors often associated with criminals, as identified by psychology. It will explore concepts such as antisocial personality traits, manipulative behavior, aggression and violence, poor impulse control, substance abuse, low empathy, poor problem-solving skills, and the impact of childhood adversity. By examining these behaviors, we can gain a better understanding of the psychological mechanisms that drive criminal behavior and inform interventions aimed at reducing crime rates and rehabilitating offenders.

Through the lens of psychology, this article aims to provide valuable insights into the unique behaviors exhibited by criminals, shedding light on the complex interplay of factors that contribute to criminality. By deepening our understanding of these behaviors, we can strive for a more informed and nuanced approach to addressing criminal behavior and its societal impacts.

Unique Behaviors of Criminals According to Psychology

Psychology has identified several unique behaviors and characteristics that are often associated with criminals. It is important to note that not all individuals who exhibit these behaviors are criminals, and these factors should be considered alongside other evidence in the context of a criminal investigation. Here are some unique behaviors often discussed in the field of psychology:

Antisocial Personality Traits: Criminals often display a lack of remorse, empathy, and disregard for the rights of others. They may exhibit a pattern of deceitfulness, impulsivity, and a tendency to violate social norms.

Manipulative Behavior: Criminals may be skilled at manipulating others to achieve their goals. They can be charming, persuasive, and adept at exploiting vulnerabilities in others for personal gain.

Aggression and Violence: Many criminals exhibit a propensity for aggression and violence. They may have a history of aggressive behavior, a lack of impulse control, and a willingness to use physical force to achieve their objectives.

Poor Impulse Control: Criminals often struggle with impulse control, making them more likely to engage in impulsive and risky behaviors without considering the potential consequences. This can contribute to their involvement in criminal activities.

Substance Abuse: Substance abuse is common among criminals. The misuse of drugs or alcohol can impair judgment, increase aggression, and lead to criminal behavior as individuals may resort to illegal activities to sustain their addiction or acquire drugs.

Low Empathy: Criminals often have a diminished ability to empathize with others. They may struggle to understand or relate to the emotions and perspectives of their victims, which can contribute to their willingness to harm others.

Poor Problem-Solving Skills: Criminals may exhibit difficulties in problem-solving and conflict resolution. They may resort to illegal activities as a means to address challenges or conflicts in their lives, rather than seeking legal or socially acceptable solutions.

History of Childhood Adversity: Many criminals have a history of adverse childhood experiences, such as neglect, abuse, or trauma. These experiences can contribute to the development of criminal behavior later in life.

It is important to remember that these behaviors and characteristics are not exclusive to criminals, and many factors contribute to criminal behavior, including social, environmental, and individual factors. Psychological assessments and evaluations conducted by professionals should be utilized to make accurate determinations regarding an individual’s criminal tendencies.

Antisocial Personality Traits

Antisocial personality traits are significant factors associated with criminal behavior. Individuals exhibiting these traits often display a pattern of disregard for the rights and feelings of others, a lack of empathy, and a general disregard for societal norms. Here, we explore the characteristics and implications of antisocial personality traits in relation to criminal behavior.

Lack of Remorse or Guilt: Individuals with antisocial personality traits tend to exhibit little to no remorse or guilt for their actions, even when their behavior causes harm to others. They may rationalize or minimize the consequences of their actions, showing little concern for the impact on their victims or society as a whole.

Impulsivity and Irresponsibility: Those with antisocial personality traits often struggle with impulse control and have difficulty considering the long-term consequences of their actions. They may engage in impulsive, reckless behavior without considering the potential harm it may cause to themselves or others. Additionally, they tend to have a lack of regard for obligations or commitments, frequently displaying irresponsible behavior such as failure to maintain employment or fulfill legal obligations.

Deceitfulness and Manipulation: Individuals with antisocial personality traits are often skilled manipulators and may engage in deceitful behavior to achieve their goals. They may lie, con, or manipulate others for personal gain, using charm and charisma to exploit vulnerabilities and gain trust.

Aggression and Hostility: Antisocial individuals may display a tendency toward aggression and hostility. They may have a quick temper, engage in physical fights, or exhibit a general pattern of confrontational behavior. This aggression can manifest in both verbal and physical forms, posing a threat to those around them.

Lack of Empathy and Callousness: Individuals with antisocial traits often demonstrate a diminished ability to empathize with others. They may struggle to understand or relate to the emotions and experiences of their victims, which can contribute to their willingness to engage in harmful behavior. They may display a lack of concern for the well-being of others and a callous disregard for the suffering they may cause.

It is important to note that not all individuals with antisocial personality traits will become criminals, as other factors, such as social environment and individual resilience, play significant roles. However, these traits are frequently observed among individuals involved in criminal activities. Understanding the connection between antisocial personality traits and criminal behavior can help inform interventions aimed at preventing and addressing criminal conduct, as well as guiding efforts to rehabilitate individuals displaying these traits.

Manipulative Behavior

Manipulative behavior is another significant characteristic often associated with criminals. It refers to the ability to influence, control, or exploit others for personal gain or to achieve one’s own objectives. Here, we explore the nature of manipulative behavior and its implications in the context of criminal behavior.

Charm and Persuasion: Manipulative individuals often possess the ability to charm and persuade others. They may be charismatic, engaging, and adept at gaining the trust and confidence of their targets. By presenting a likable and trustworthy persona, they can manipulate others into doing their bidding or complying with their requests.

Exploitation of Vulnerabilities: Manipulators excel at identifying and exploiting the weaknesses and vulnerabilities of others. They may have a keen understanding of human psychology, using this knowledge to manipulate others emotionally, financially, or psychologically. They may prey on people’s insecurities, fears, or desires, manipulating them into actions that benefit the manipulator.

Deception and Lies: Manipulative individuals are skilled at deception and often use lies to manipulate others. They may create elaborate narratives, fabricate stories, or distort the truth to further their own interests. Their lies can be persuasive and difficult to detect, making it challenging for others to see through their manipulative tactics.

Emotional Manipulation: Manipulators are adept at exploiting the emotions of others to control or influence their behavior. They may engage in tactics such as guilt-tripping, gaslighting, or playing on people’s sympathy to manipulate them into doing what they want. By manipulating emotions, they gain power and control over their targets.

Manipulation for Personal Gain: The primary motivation behind manipulative behavior is often personal gain. Manipulators may seek financial benefits, power, control, or the fulfillment of their own desires. They are willing to exploit others without regard for the well-being or rights of their victims.

In the context of criminal behavior, manipulative tactics can be used to facilitate various types of illegal activities, such as fraud, theft, or manipulation within interpersonal relationships. Criminals may use their manipulative skills to deceive, coerce, or control others, enabling them to carry out criminal acts without detection or accountability.

Understanding the manipulative behavior displayed by criminals is crucial for law enforcement, psychologists, and society at large. It allows for the development of strategies to identify and counteract manipulation, raise awareness among potential victims, and improve the overall resilience of individuals and communities against manipulative tactics.

Aggression and Violence

Aggression and violence are significant behaviors often observed in individuals involved in criminal activities. These behaviors can manifest in various forms and have distinct implications within the context of criminal behavior. Here, we explore aggression and violence as unique behaviors associated with criminals.

Physical Aggression: Criminals may exhibit a propensity for physical aggression. This can include acts such as physical assaults, fights, or acts of violence directed towards others. They may resort to physical force to achieve their goals, assert dominance, or intimidate others.

Verbal Aggression: Verbal aggression is another common form of aggression displayed by criminals. They may engage in hostile or threatening language, intimidation, or verbal abuse to assert control or manipulate others. Verbal aggression can be used as a tool to instill fear, gain compliance, or create an environment of hostility.

Impulsivity and Reactive Violence: Criminals often exhibit impulsivity and have difficulty controlling their aggressive impulses. They may react to perceived threats or provocations with immediate and intense violence. This reactive violence can be characterized by a lack of planning or forethought and a rapid escalation of aggressive behavior.

Instrumental Violence: Instrumental violence refers to the use of physical force as a means to an end, such as achieving a specific goal or gaining power over others. Criminals may employ violence strategically to achieve their criminal objectives, such as robbery, coercion, or control over territories.

Intimidation and Coercion: Aggressive and violent behavior can be used as tools of intimidation and coercion by criminals. They may use threats, physical force, or displays of violence to instill fear in others, gain compliance, or exert control over individuals or communities. This can create an atmosphere of fear and enable criminals to manipulate and exploit their victims.

It is important to note that while aggression and violence are common among criminals, not all individuals who display these behaviors are involved in criminal activities. Various factors, including underlying psychological issues, environmental influences, and individual circumstances, contribute to the expression of aggression and violence. Nonetheless, understanding the connection between aggression, violence, and criminal behavior is essential for developing effective interventions aimed at reducing crime rates, promoting non-violent conflict resolution, and addressing the root causes of aggressive and violent behaviors.

Poor Impulse Control

Poor impulse control is a significant behavioral characteristic often associated with criminals. It refers to the difficulty individuals have in regulating their immediate reactions or behaviors in favor of more rational, long-term thinking. Here, we explore the nature of poor impulse control and its implications in the context of criminal behavior.

Impulsive Behavior: Individuals with poor impulse control tend to engage in impulsive actions without considering the potential consequences. They act on their immediate desires or emotions without adequately considering the long-term effects of their actions. This impulsivity can lead to engaging in risky or illegal behaviors without considering the potential legal, social, or personal ramifications.

Lack of Delayed Gratification: Poor impulse control is often characterized by a struggle to delay gratification. Individuals may prioritize immediate rewards or pleasures over long-term goals or benefits. This can lead to engaging in impulsive behaviors, such as theft, drug abuse, or acts of violence, in an attempt to fulfill immediate desires or alleviate discomfort.

Risky Decision-Making: Individuals with poor impulse control often make decisions without fully considering the risks involved. They may engage in high-risk activities, such as reckless driving, substance abuse, or participation in illegal activities, without adequately weighing the potential negative consequences. This can result in an increased likelihood of engaging in criminal behavior.

Inability to Consider Consequences: Poor impulse control is often characterized by a diminished ability to consider or appreciate the potential consequences of one’s actions. Individuals may act in the heat of the moment without fully understanding or anticipating the impact of their behavior on themselves or others. This can lead to engaging in criminal acts without fully comprehending the potential legal, social, or emotional repercussions.

Difficulty in Emotional Regulation: Poor impulse control can also manifest in difficulties with emotional regulation. Individuals may struggle to manage intense emotions, such as anger, frustration, or impulsivity, and may act out in ways that are harmful to themselves or others. This can contribute to engaging in impulsive, aggressive, or criminal behavior as a means of coping with or expressing their emotions.

Understanding the role of poor impulse control in criminal behavior is crucial for developing effective interventions and prevention strategies. Enhancing impulse control skills, promoting emotional regulation, and teaching alternative coping mechanisms can be valuable in reducing impulsive and potentially criminal behaviors. Moreover, addressing underlying psychological factors that contribute to poor impulse control, such as attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) or substance abuse, can be important in mitigating the risk of engaging in criminal activities.

Substance Abuse

Substance abuse is a significant behavioral characteristic often associated with criminal behavior. The misuse or dependence on substances such as drugs or alcohol can have profound impacts on an individual’s cognition, decision-making, and behavior, often leading to an increased risk of engaging in criminal activities. Here, we explore the relationship between substance abuse and criminal behavior.

Impaired Judgment and Impulsivity: Substance abuse can impair judgment and impulse control, leading individuals to make impulsive and reckless decisions. Under the influence of drugs or alcohol, individuals may engage in behaviors they would otherwise consider unacceptable or illegal, such as theft, violence, or driving under the influence.

Acquisitive Crime: Substance abusers may resort to acquisitive crimes, such as theft or robbery, to sustain their addiction or obtain drugs. The need to obtain money or resources to support their substance abuse can drive individuals to engage in criminal activities as a means to acquire the substances they crave.

Drug Trafficking and Distribution: Some individuals involved in substance abuse may become involved in drug trafficking or distribution networks. Engaging in these illegal activities provides them with access to drugs and potentially lucrative financial gains. Drug trafficking and distribution are serious criminal offenses with significant societal implications.

Violence and Aggression: Substance abuse can increase the likelihood of aggressive and violent behavior. The disinhibiting effects of drugs or alcohol can lower inhibitions and escalate conflicts, leading to physical altercations or acts of violence. Substance abuse can also exacerbate underlying aggression or anger issues, further increasing the risk of engaging in violent criminal behavior.

Legal Consequences: Substance abuse frequently leads to legal entanglements. Individuals may face charges related to drug possession, driving under the influence, or other drug-related offenses. These legal consequences can result in arrests, convictions, and potential incarceration, further intertwining substance abuse with criminal behavior.

Criminal Subculture and Associations: Substance abuse often occurs within a social context that includes criminal subcultures and associations. Engaging in substance abuse within these environments can increase exposure to criminal activities and provide individuals with opportunities to become involved in illegal behavior.

It is important to recognize that not all individuals who misuse substances become involved in criminal activities. However, the correlation between substance abuse and criminal behavior is well-established. Addressing substance abuse through prevention, treatment, and rehabilitation programs is essential in reducing the risk of individuals engaging in criminal activities while providing them with the support they need to overcome addiction and lead productive, law-abiding lives.

Low Empathy

Low empathy is a psychological characteristic often associated with criminals. It refers to a diminished ability to understand and share the feelings, perspectives, and experiences of others. Individuals with low empathy may have difficulty recognizing and responding to the emotional states of others, which can contribute to their engagement in criminal behavior. Here, we explore the nature of low empathy and its implications in the context of criminal behavior.

Lack of Remorse or Empathetic Concern: Individuals with low empathy often demonstrate little to no remorse or empathetic concern for the harm they cause to others. They may have a limited capacity to understand or internalize the emotional impact of their actions on their victims, showing little or no empathy for the suffering they inflict.

Reduced Prosocial Behavior: Prosocial behavior involves actions that benefit others or society as a whole. Individuals with low empathy may exhibit a decreased inclination to engage in prosocial behaviors. Instead, they may prioritize their own needs, desires, or goals without considering the welfare of others. This lack of empathy can contribute to a higher likelihood of engaging in criminal behavior, as the concerns and well-being of others hold little significance to them.

Lack of Perspective Taking: Perspective-taking refers to the ability to understand and consider the thoughts, feelings, and perspectives of others. Individuals with low empathy may struggle to adopt the viewpoint of others or understand the consequences of their actions from someone else’s standpoint. This limited perspective-taking ability can hinder their ability to understand the impact of their behavior on others, making it easier for them to engage in harmful or criminal acts without considering the consequences for their victims.

Difficulty Establishing and Maintaining Relationships: Low empathy can hinder the establishment and maintenance of meaningful relationships. Individuals with low empathy may struggle to connect with others on an emotional level, leading to challenges in building trust, forming healthy relationships, and maintaining social bonds. This isolation and difficulty in forming positive connections can contribute to an increased risk of engaging in criminal behavior as individuals may lack the support and positive influences necessary to deter them from criminal acts.

Manipulative Behavior: Individuals with low empathy may display manipulative tendencies, exploiting others for personal gain without regard for their well-being. Their lack of empathy allows them to deceive, manipulate, or take advantage of others without experiencing feelings of guilt or remorse. This manipulative behavior can facilitate criminal activities such as fraud, theft, or coercion.

Understanding the impact of low empathy on criminal behavior can guide interventions aimed at addressing the root causes of criminality. Promoting empathy development, social-emotional learning, and fostering a greater understanding of the perspectives and feelings of others can contribute to reducing criminal behavior and promoting more compassionate and prosocial attitudes among individuals at risk of engaging in criminal acts.

[inesestradavigil]

Empathy Deficit...

As humans, I consider we have an enormous deficit of empathy. I guess this is one of the reasons why so many of us are close to our pets. They always are aware of how we feel, they don’t judge, they just sit by our side. pets were very significant emotional support for many during covid and , still are. This empathy deficit can be seen in many places. Seems like so many people feel they are at…

[stillgotscars]

“i don’t have any sympathy for all the rich people who lost their homes” everyone affected by the wildfires in los angeles deserves empathy. wealthy or not, they are human. just because someone is rich doesn’t mean it’s not utterly devastating for them to lose their house and a lot of their sentimental items that have been reduced to ash. hope this helps!

[lachiennearoo]

Can people fucking stop telling me I'm too sensitive, fr??

Like, as if I didn't already know that. As if I didn't constantly beat myself up for always overreacting to every little thing like a dumb child. Stop telling me I'm a party pooper, ruiner of fun with a stick up my ass. I'm already my biggest hater and my harshest critic. All you're doing is making me feel even more like shit and even more justified to hate myself because of it, because I think "if everyone else also thinks I'm oversensitive and always overreacting then I'm right"

I don't want to be told shit I already know. I don't want to be told "you have to change you have to get better" when I think about that shit every day.

I want to be comforted and told that it's okay. That it'll pass. That I'll get better with time. That I'm trying my best and my efforts are seen and understood. That I'm loved.

[wherepond]

Trump unhinged

Trump make fatal decision as World united against him

MeidasTouch host Ben Meiselas reports on fed up world leaders turning against Trump and preparing for the worst.

[happyk44]

I like that Renzo's portrayal still makes it kinda unsure which side he's actually on.

Personally, I'd prefer him being on his own side. He's doing this because it's personally entertaining, not because he has any moral or emotional stake on the beliefs of either side. It makes it easy to convince both sides he's actually with them, because he genuinely doesn't give a shit so he can fake it very effectively. He cares for his friends and push come to shove, he'll likely side with them. But he also said that the main selling point of being a double agent was getting to lie and deceive to everyone.

[regulus-the-raggedy-doctor]

Holy fuck

People.

I have hyper empathy. That's why I get drained so easily in social situations! Oh my god this is a revelation. Amazing. Holy cow. I always knew people tired me out, but I never knew why!

[clowngore]

anyone diagnosed with a cluster b personality disorder or autism, or something else that affects empathy, want to help me write a paper for my psychology class on hypoempathy?

[azurecanary]

Trying to get someone to justify their beliefs on the Internet is like pulling teeth istg

[bode-leone]

i think a lot of people fundamentally misunderstand that lacking empathy doesn't automatically make you a raging abuser and killer, it just makes you confused and convinced you're fundamentally faulty because you just. don't feel things. you learn the ability to pretend you have empathy but there's a gaping hole inside of you where your ability to be cohesive with the community should be that you can never fill.

[indirectcomedian]

my only consistent and close friends are all autistic as hell