#and that an adult is not going to validate them for showing someone else's drawing | Explore Tumblr posts and blogs

crumblinggothicarchitecture · 8 months ago

Note

I'm a hater so I go simplest route for all of swifts song analysis but to be fair, she does too. "You drew scars..." felt, to me, like she was saying "you romanticized my flaws then they got worse after you left." so like, accepting your lovers flaws because you love them for them like a real life regular adult relationship. Then she kind of blames the problems she already had, the scars opening up, on the guy leaving as per usual. She gives me the vibe of someone who thinks a relationship will fix her life then gets mad that it doesn't. Idk she clearly has issues with cheating and men in general but always drops sympathy bait. It's crazy how she's still playing the victim at every opportunity when the people suffering the most are those forced to listen to her goddawful lyrics.

Yep- equally valid and good interpretation. "Drawing stars" could very well mean "romanticizing her flaws" but she never does anything with that theme either. She doesn't mention what the flaws were- or that she has flaws at all. It's more clearly implied that her "scars" are from someone who hurt her without cause- and then this new person reopened her scars also without justification. So how can it be "romanticizing" her past hurts- if she never tells us the rest of the story! (she's just not a good writer- so, ya it's hard to tell what she actually means by it all). Though, it's very much sympathy bait- for how she wants to be viewed as a victim of every circumstance and every interpersonal conflict she's ever had. But also, where is the textual evidence? All of this is extrapolation and conjecture based on what I know about T. Swift as a person- it's just not in the song itself. Ya know?

Edit: addition: It is a fictional song- I'm just saying that Taylor Swifts general attitude about life and relationships impacts the way she writes the song- therefore it shows in the underlying implications of her self-victimizing lyrics and the way she consistently praises cheaters/ says they should be forgiven. Also, when I refer to "her" in the rest of the post- I mean from the narrator's perspective, Betty, as the "her." It's not exactly from Swifts perspective- but I do think Swifts attitude towards life is reflected in the lyrics.

I discussed my perspective on the song is that she is saying the person to which she wants to feel a connection is leaving just because the next line is "I knew you" ("Cardigan" 2020) putting the relationship into past tense. So, as far as textual evidence can stretch, all she manages to say in the song is that the person has left her behind.

She is clearly leaning into the victimization aspect of "I opened up to you and you left anyway, how dare you" type of narration. However, this, and your, interpretation requires innate understanding of Taylor Swift's history and personality. (It's why the song sucks so bad). It can't stand alone- because on its own, when I only rely on textual evidence to tell me about the theme and purpose of the narrative arc in the song- the actual evidence of that "I opened up to you and you left, how dare you" theme is nowhere to be found.

Maybe, if we stretch, and say her line "you put me on and said I was your favorite" could lean into the "indignation" interpretation, because she's mad that someone would leave after saying she was their favorite. However, again she drops the theme- because she never explains why they left, or how anything could have been different.

She does give the line "choose two girls lose the one" yet- it's not fully connected to the previous thematic idea of "I opened up to you and you left anyway" because why is she mad that a cheater left her? Isn't that a cause for relief? Like they are someone else's problem now? I feel like that would be more relatable, anyway, but no she says later in the song that "you'd come back to me." And, why? why is the point of this song that girl feels like she won something because a cheater, and someone who hurt her emotionally, returned to her in the end? What- we're supposed to feel all happy because she "won" the boy over the other girl? It's just ant-feminist propaganda at this point- talking about how the boy picked her so that means she's the "better" girl.

But, also, for the possible thematic point on "love as redemption" which is what I mentioned in my previous post, the theme doesn't connect here either. Why would the love of a cheater be redemptive? Why would we believe that, Taylor Swift, please explain.

It's just not self-refelctive at all. It's really just an incomplete narrative- basically incoherent. It's so frustrating- as someone who has studied and poured over text searching for meaning in context- finding nothing to support any real thematic purpose of any of these metaphors just makes the whole song ring so hollow.

All she says over and over is "I knew you" and also that she feels like an old cardigan. Again, she approaches the conceptual points that she wants to convey- but does them is a clumsy, awkward way that really only lands within her already-bulit audience. Only her own audience is going to understand what she means- because she's built up this mythos-of-self into her greater rhetorical situation.

One of the most important tenets in the study of English Literature is textual evidence. In that previous post, I was doing what is called a "close reading" rather than any kind of application of theory- it all relies heavily on textual evidence and interpretation. I am not necessarily disagreeing with your point, but I am saying I don't personally see the textual evidence to suggest the theme. My teachers all really stressed the importance of making no assumptions- therefore no undue leaps in logic, and simply relying on the text itself to speak. It's how proper argumentation can function- because it's all rooted into meaning extracted only from the literal words on the page- otherwise it all falls to simple conjecture.

Wouldn't want to be caught dead setting up an argument based on conjecture alone. :)

#anti taylor swift #ex swiftie #taylor swift critical #cardigan #folklore

16 notes · View notes

redheadlesbianfreak · 2 years ago

Text

I’m really glad that people in the TMNT fanbase have finally started calling out the insistence that 2012 Splinter is irredeemably abusive. As well as how the criticism comes across as racist. The way the character is depicted in the show versus the way he is often depicted in fan content is like night and day. I’m open to different fan interpretations, but I’ve seen an insane amount of fans confidently state that he’s canonically abusive. And this is one of the worst misinterpretations of canon I’ve ever seen in fanon.

2012 Splinter was raised in Japan, and seems to take on a more East Asian style of parenting. He’s stricter with his sons, but usually when they put themselves or their brothers in danger. However, I would say that he’s far more gentle and understanding than anything else. And I would like to clarify that reasonably disciplining your kids and teaching them right from wrong is not abusive. That’s what it means to be a parent. Never correcting misbehavior is another form of abuse, one that borders on neglect.

Another thing to consider is that he’s in a very unique situation. Splinter and the turtles are mutants. They will never be accepted by society and will always be seen as monsters; he knows this. He teaches his sons how to fight so they can defend themselves in a world that will try to hunt them down and kill them. He has nightmares about his sons dying. The show explores the terror he faces as a parent, which is something he’s already experienced with the loss of his daughter and wife.

Splinter is devastated and relieved to find that Miwa is alive. He loves her as his daughter, but that doesn’t mean he no longer sees the turtles as his sons. He views them as being his children just as much as his biological child. He clarifies this to Leonardo. The reason I love TMNT so much as a franchise is because it’s one of the few pieces of media that explores familial love within an adopted family. And TMNT 2012 constantly reiterates that family can look unconventional and does not need to be bound by blood.

Splinter is a realistic depiction of a parental figure. Most parents in media are either abusive or perfect with no in-between. Splinter is the type of parent who tries his best but still makes mistakes. In real life, there is no such thing as a perfect parent. Even the kindest parents are going to make mistakes from time to time. But my favorite thing about Splinter is that he almost always owns up to his mistakes. Rather than doubling down or pretending he did nothing wrong, he admits his wrongdoing and apologizes. And that’s way better than a lot of parents.

I don’t want to get too personal, but I grew up with several abusive adults in my life. I know firsthand what it’s like to experience very violent abuse at the hands of an adult. It fucked me up and I’m still recovering from it. Pretty much none of those adults ever admitted wrongdoing or grew as a person. In their eyes, they were always in the right and I deserved what I was getting. I would’ve loved to have a patient and kind adult in my life like 2012 Splinter.

Abuse looks different for everyone, and I don’t want to imply my experiences are universal. But as someone who did grow up in that environment, it’s upsetting to see people blow Splinter’s actions out of proportion in order to validate their dislike of a him. To me, it feels like fans are using the abuse as a tool to make their opinions look morally correct. As a writer, I understand making alternate universes to amp up the angst potential. But insisting that fanon is canon is where I draw the line, especially when it comes to willfully misinterpreting a character.

#tmnt #tmnt 2012 #tmnt 2012 splinter #i’ve been wanting to make this post for a very long time #and no this is not an invitation to shit on other versions of tmnt #fanon is not canon #and yeah it does feel racist #it reminds me of when people were saying abuela from encanto was super evil #no these two characters are nuanced #and it’s fine to dislike this character #but as i said it’s when people try to make him look morally bad #to justify their opinion as the correct one #idk guys fandom is super weird :/

86 notes · View notes

dyslexicandakeyboard · 11 months ago

Text

I'm one to rag on comics sooo...

WFA serious two parters is one of the worst things to happened to batfamily fandom.

And I hate myself for this because I don't really analyse fiction in a "this is bad objectively" way. Like if a story is effective in communicating it's themes and yadyadya then it's good.

Basically, WFA is effective when writing a simple, no-stakes, firmly slice of life story. It's art is whimsical and 'simple' (Not saying it's easy to draw), it's characters are not meant to be seen or discussed in a complex light and their characterisation mainly comes from outside sources, it's story lines are also pretty simple. WFA hits the mark when it's slice of life. It hits it quite effectively.

But, when it goes "deep" or tries to handle "canonical" character flaws, it's very ineffective.

That dumb ass big brother two parter is the bane of my existence. And I'll use it as an example.

Like the whole set up that leads to the main conflict was so contrived (like most of the conflicts in the two parters).

For one, why is Damian asking Dick to drive him? Is there no Alfred or Bruce. It's Alfred's job as a butler, is Alfred busy? But Damian was in school uniform walking into the Manor, then Alfred must have dropped him off. Why didn't Damian just ask Alfred.

But, maybe Damian forgot and Alfred had somewhere else to be. If so then Bruce. But Bruce may be at work, that's a reason. Then why isn't Dick at work? Why is Dick just at the Manor? Day off? But Dick is a main character and shows up in most stories. Shouldn't Dick have less appearances if so or delegate his appearances to phone calls if he's an adult and as a job?

See?

Next, is Tim's reaction. Now, I understand feeling left out. But, Tim is seventeen. A near adult. Having you're day of fun be pushed back for an important errand isn't the end of the world. It's not like Dick said "fuck it, I wanna go clubbing". It's not like it was previously established that Dick constantly ran himself dry trying to please all of them and in the effort hurt Tim. It came out of left field.

All of these cracks in the narrative leads to the plot to seem unrealistic, and thus the the reader will consider it contrived. This also leads to the theme/concept/ideas explored in the chapters seem less impactful.

Also the fact that Dick doesn't really have the flaw of "not asking for help when trying to maintain family relationships". Not saying Dick's the best brother in the whole wide world but Dick has been maintaining his family relationships as the eldest brother for a long time. Dick being responsible and helping Damian doesn't mean that Dick doesn't have time for Tim or that he's blowing him off, it means life got in the way of play. It's also kinda a false equivalence to imply going to an arcade is as important as helping your brother with homework.

Could Dick ask one of his siblings to take Damian, of course.

Was it actually needed in the situation, no.

Was Tim valid for feeling that way, yes.

Was Dick/Tim/Damian in the wrong or had behaviour that needed to be rectified, no.

It could have been an interesting exploration of the role that the eldest plays in the family and how taxing it can be along with how someone can feel an emotion and understand that even if they do feel somehow it doesn't mean that it's the appropriate response to a situation.

Plus, the whole character flaw for Dick is never brought up again. There's no follow up where we see him accept help from the family. The whole story arc which is supposed to develop his character leads nowhere. Rendering the big brother arc meaningless for Dick's character and the webtoon at a whole.

#anti wfa

13 notes · View notes

rainbowgaez · 1 year ago

Text

i saw a comic or something about this the other day but i can't find it now. it was about learning to do makeup and one of the things it goes over is trying to follow a tutorial only for the person following the tutorial to be frustrated when their final product didn't look as good as the final result in the tutorial, and it got me thinking about my own journey with learning makeup and how ive managed to mostly steer clear of that frustration.

learning how to do makeup well is definitely intimidating and a lot harder than it may initially seem (especially if you're like me, a trans woman who didn't approach it until she was 30). in the beginning, it feels kind of humiliating. pretty much no matter what, your first few times are going to end in you looking like you let a toddler do your makeup. that's okay, though. that's completely normal, and you should try to be comfortable with that going into it. and that's part of why i think when you're first learning makeup, you should avoid tutorials for anything outside of the very basics, and try to focus on finding out what you want out of doing makeup instead.

the reason people manage to make things look so good in tutorials is because they're showing you how to do something they've probably done a million times in a row. even if you're given the exact methodology, the same tools and materials, you're probably not going to get it right the first time (and if you do, you won't the second time). and that's really irritating! because you follow everything they do to the best of your ability, and when you compare your results to theirs, it just doesn't match up even though it feels like it should. but i think that end result comparison is what generates a lot of frustration.

i very specifically used the phrasing "looking like you let a toddler do your makeup" earlier because, well, what is a toddler but a very young, inexperienced person? of course it's going to look like that when you're starting out. being an adult may allow you to understand things easier than a child would, but your ability to execute is always going to be hampered by lack of experience, and the only way to get your hands to do it right is by going through the motions enough times until you feel confident—the amount of times being something that will vary from person to person.

the other reason i think avoiding tutorials in the beginning is important is personal angle. what you want out of doing makeup and what someone giving tutorials might have wanted aren't always going to align. i feel like a good majority of people approach makeup like they have to be good at it (as nebulous as that concept is), and while that's a perfectly valid way to go about it if it works for you, i think that can end up making the whole thing feel way more rigid than it actually is.

something that's really common with tutorials for any kind of art form (and that irritates me to no end) is how much people will focus on "DON'T DO THIS THING BECAUSE ITS WRONG," and the reason it annoys me is because, on more than one occasion, The Wrong Thing i've been told to avoid is instilled in my brain as The Law ends up working really well for me actually. this is something i have experienced a LOT as a musician.

so when i started learning makeup, i approached it like i would any other art form—an open landscape of self-expression i can cultivate through uninhibited exploration. instead of following the dots on someone else's map, i charted my own path.

to put it in a less pretentious way: i saw an excuse to figure out how to do cool shit by drawing on my face. specifically, i got really into eye makeup because i could get really colorful and creative with it. if my username doesn't make it obvious enough, i love bright, saturated colors of all kinds, and drawing them on my eyes is a really great way to express that in a way that's inherently unique to me. eventually i learned how to do other stuff, too, but this method of exploring on my own allowed me to pick and choose the things i like to do the most, which made the experience a lot more fun and rewarding.

once i started focusing on that, i felt more comfortable with messing it up. mistakes looked less like fuck ups and more like opportunities to figure out how to make something weird Work. it got easier to justify putting on makeup regardless of whether or not im leaving the house that day (and most of the time i don't end up leaving when i do it lol), and easier to keep it on even when it didn't pan out the way i imagined it. i just approached it like i was drawing a daily picture. and i certainly ended up looking ridiculous on quite a few occasions—ill never forget asking one of my roommates how i look the first time i ever did makeup and her pausing for several seconds before saying "...it's a start."—but because i was doing it for the fun of it, that didn't bother me.

i was lucky enough to have my older sister show me how to do basic things a couple times in the beginning—stuff like what are the basic materials/tools you need, and what's the most efficient order to apply things—but something she always emphasized was that there's no wrong way to do it, and that i should always experiment if i feel inclined. because everyone has different tools, everyone has different materials, and even though a lot of the tools/materials her and i use are the same, there's two fundamental differences: we both have a different canvas, and we both have different ideas of what we want. and so does everyone else.

you might not learn as efficiently as someone else��it might take you months to figure out something that took someone else only a few days to nail—but efficiency shouldn't be your goal. besides, that's going to happen regardless of how you learn it. do it because you want to. or don't do it at all! do what you want lol.

#long post #hope any of this makes sense LOL

15 notes · View notes

beast-feast · 7 months ago

Note

Hey. Anon here.

I really don’t want to add on to drama, but I’m just so fucking confused. Because whenever I hear the term “proshipper” my mind immediately goes to the worst types of people. People who think pedophilic, incestuious (forgive me if I spelled that wrong), and shipping abusive characters with their victims is ok. Not like, showing the horrors of what it can do, but romanticizing it. Which is something that isn’t ok.

Now, I don’t agree with harassment. That ain’t ok. But…that’s not what you meant by “proshipping”, right?

Oh yeah no absolutely not, that's not what I meant. What happened, without giving names or too many details, was that someone from several servers I was in draws art that is proship and they identify as one. However they do NOT want to affiliate with anyone who actually thinks that that type of stuff is okay — so y'know, even if they draw noncon and incest and stuff, they don't want anyone who is actually into that with real people to talk to them. Which is valid, because neither do I lol.

Being around them and other folks with similar opinions is definitely an experience; I don't align with them with some things, just because it isn't my taste, but everyone involved are adults and so I just don't pay mind to it lol. I just move on. I know that these people don't actually want to like, idk, make out with their siblings so I'm not really concerned with what they draw on their own time. I've had a number of conversations that go into what people would consider "proship" territory but honestly 9 times out of 10 it isn't romanticized. And definitely never condoned.

Obviously there's proshippers that ARE actually into that kind of stuff, like actively seeking out real life content of incest and rape and whatever else, but those are people I think that everyone should avoid. Not because they're a proshipper but because, y'know. They indulge in the actual harm of a person/people that are actually alive. THOSE are the types of people that I think a lot of folks think proshippers are, or that they're secretly grooming minors or something, but honestly like. Every server with these people is strictly 18+, and have a sort of verification system to make sure that getting in as a minor is minimized.

Basically TL;DR: "Proshipping" as I use it is for people that are engaging in content that involves only fictional people. I don't affiliate nor do I even Like people that take those idealogies and seek out that content with real life people and especially minors.

#not art #ask/answer #tw rape #// rape #tw incest #// incest #tw ???

5 notes · View notes

tw1stedthicket · 9 months ago

Text

Sorry if this is rather deep for my tumblr, but I feel like I gotta acknowledge how much of standing on my own two feet as an adult is heavily because of efforts to re-parent myself. I'm having to develop my own 'person' for the first time -- yes, it was always there, but it was like a baby bird that couldn't fly. There was nothing broken or faulty, but it was struggling to grow past a certain point without someone taking compassion and patience on it to give it what it needed. I have had to figure out who the fuck I actually am. What actually matters to me, what that looks like, and who I want to be. I am having to restrain the overactive judging part of me all too eager to jump to not having self worth, all too prone to shame, all too susceptible to projecting impatience with other people even over minor annoyance or upsetness, and struggling to accept it from others or myself, or feel indignant when other people push past me at work that I never stand up to. I feel like I'm learning what "benefit of the doubt" and "assuming the good" actually means, and God! So much shit I'm unlearning about failure and what that means for me, about not carrying myself in a small way, about drawing boundaries with people and myself and what is owed to me and what I owe to them, and about the way people do actually tend to forgive, do tend to extend mercy, do empathize with the feeling of yearning, of honest to god earnestness at our cores. We want to be loved. I'm learning how people are, and it's been such a long time coming to even stand.up. To face the day and not succumb to fear, and take baby steps toward the vulnerability of optimism, here again not too late now that I know my life is my own to live and nobody else's unhappiness to bear. The courage of acceptance, despite the possibility of rejection and abandonment, and I just couldn't have gotten to this point without learning what I have the last six years.

Lessons learned like, "Relationships require trust that people do not intend to hurt you, and if there are issues they will communicate it if they care about you, and if you care about them, you need to not build up resentment and actually communicate with them and trust them." Things like, "You're not on such a spotlight that performance is required of you. The only thing 'asked' is to be human. People don't actually care that much to notice and trip you up over perceived failings or unmet expectations, just show up wherever you are, be you, and let it go because it doesn't actually matter that much." Things like, "The validation of other people is your only lifeline when you feel empty inside, and that's okay while you are building it. But you will forever feel empty unless you learn to inhabit the space inside you and reach out to it in kindness, because the only place and person you are left with is you, and you will forever be capable of being ruined by the abandonment of others until you accept that you are, in fact, not a creature to have mercy on, but an entire, fleshed out human being worthy of everything you desire, and you do have a lot of acceptance and beauty around you already. You have to learn to treat yourself with love, like a friend, like the human you are, like you are on your own side, to keep going and not burn out. The center you crave of finally feeling safe, and safe enough to rest, has to be built from a foundation of love inside you. You are a safe place to lie down in. You see what you wish others did, and that's enough, and when you connect with others, it is as two people recognizing how together we are in our own lives, like neighbors in our gardens rising with the day to lovingly water our flowers & give a friendly laugh to. That means do what you love, own it, forgive yourself every time, be patient like you're still learning, and trust yourself that you are doing the right thing."

So much of my life is built around the anxiety of unlovability. And I've dug so much and know so much about perfectionism, people-pleasing, spirituality, co-dependecy, anxious attachment, etc. But it all kinda revolves around a fear of aloneness and inevitable abandonment, where unconditional love, kindness, warmth, understanding, patience, forgiveness, trust, listening, remembering, etc. is what is healing me. It feels like it's finally being delivered by me, someone who finally grew up enough to be able to give it. To be the stronger person to get down on the level of a child and extend compassion. I don't know if this is how it is for anyone else. That the source of unconditional love is arriving to them from a bigger, older figure after all - them, in the future. I've spent years trying to get it from my parents, even past the point of trying but still confusingly wondering how, even still indignantly upset that it still isn't there, and I admit I am still miles away from not being triggered damn near every time I come home. But I recognize it now as an adult witnessing another adult, somebody who sees the little kid in me and says "How could you do that to them?" and will step in with responsibility. I feel grief, just as I always have before I even knew its name, but at least now there's somebody else in me too - or I am somebody else altogether than I was then, and that person knows now that it's mean. It's mean to be mean to myself and leave me all alone, not having help, or trust, or warmth, or acceptance. And there is a great kindness at least now, imperfect but there, that I deserve better from myself. I can't change or fix anybody else, but I can be kind to myself at the end of the day. I can believe in myself like child me praying to a God much kinder - all the faith I need is in myself, trying to be built on every noticeable act of kindness that I am alive each day to see the beauty in it. Even on days I wish I wasn't, there are rainbows. The older me says hey, there must've been rain, wasn't there? That means puddles. Do you wanna go find 'em?

#recovery #healing #self-love

1 note · View note

pro-crastinate17 · 2 years ago

Text

ough i feel Bad.

(under readmore for length)

im not even in that much pain tbh but im ALWAYS in some level of pain. ive had off and on headaches for several days and my joint pain cant seem to pick one joint to pain lmao. knees hips shoulders ankles and that weird persistent back pain that means i cant lie down and expect to be able to sit up again. PLUS im developing tendonitis in my thumb from guitar so i cant play anymore. what the fuck.

and besides that im so fucking bored and lonely. i have friends in theory but i dont know how to talk to them, i have such a hard time starting conversations and even when i try, no one responds! nothing i do feels worthwhile, i cant Create right now.

and im so fucking tired. i cant draw or sew or write shit, im too tired. i cant play guitar or piano because of my stupid fucking tendonitis. i get dizzy every time i stand up. my vision keeps blurring. there are so few safe foods im allowed to have and i get lectured when i dont eat what everyone else eats.

and the fighting. jesus. my sibling is having medical problems (by which i mean. problems with the medical system) so they and my mom are REALLY stressed about that. which is valid to be clear. but they keep fighting and its giving me flashbacks of having to be their mediator as a child and it scares me so bad.

and on top of THAT. im getting obsessed with someone again. i cant fucking deal with it. hes not a good person i dont want to be like this about him again but UGH. everything he does is so sickeningly endearing. i hate him but i NEED him to like me. he is my superiour but im better than him and i need him to ACKNOWLEDGE me!!! i swear i will not stalk him i cant do that, havent stalked anyone in years and its genuinely such a horrible thing to do. he may not be a good person but he doesnt deserve that, no one deserves that. but still. i cant stop thinking about him. if i was gravely injured and showed up at his house because i "didnt know where else to go" would he take care of me? does he care about me??? (do i even want him to??????)

im just. so upset. about everything im being a pissbaby lmao but im so sick of everything. i wish i was an adult i dont want to be in this stupid house anymore. i want to go on t and go to college and have control over where i go and what i eat and what i wear, i want to live with my partners and feel safe and not be scared and get through my bad days because i have people who can help me not just out of spite.

i want to live.

#words from my weird little brain #dumbass complains tag #he makes me sick

1 note · View note

c-is-for-circinate · 4 years ago

Note

Wait, isn't "anti" stuff more like "anti-pedophilia" and stuff? Like, you have a point about anti-porn attitudes, but from what I've heard just "anti" on its own means against stuff like kid porn and incest porn and legitimately f*cked up sh*t like that.

Okay! So this, I think, is actually a great example of what I was talking about, and a really useful thing to understand. (CW rape, child abuse, etc)

Smarter people than me have written much better essays about why policing thoughtcrimes is a bad road to go down, and I will probably reblog some of them next time they cross my dash for more context. What I want to talk about is the trigger mechanism, the ‘oh, this looks like danger!!!’ immune response in how we look at different kinds of porn, and how that applies to anti culture.

Here’s the thing: I am anti-pedophilia. I think that, for most people, that’s a stance that largely goes without saying! Adults who prey on children are bad. I’m also against incest; relatives who prey on their family members are bad. Above all I oppose rape. Sexual predation of any kind is bad. In fact, I’d say that’s the most important item on the list. There is plenty of room to argue about where the lines are between ‘adult’ and ‘child’ and how teenagers fit in the middle, and there’s plenty of room to get historical about the lines between ethically terrible incest, distasteful-but-bearable “aristocratic inbreeding” between distant cousins, and the kind of consanguinity that tends to develop in a small town where everyone’s vaguely related to everyone else by now anyway. The core of the issue is consent, and it has always been consent. Pedophilia and incest are horrific because they are rape scenarios where the abuser has far more power and their victim far fewer resources to cope, both practically and emotionally; because harm to children is, to us as a culture, worse than harm to adults, for a lot of very valid reasons; and because they constitute betrayal of trust the victim should have been able to put in their abuser as well as rape--but they are all rape scenarios, and that’s why they’re awful.

These things are bad. It is good for us to have a social immune response system that recognizes these things when they’re happening and insists we step in. That is a good thing to develop! It helps us, as a society. It can help the people being victimized. It’s the same reason educators and childcare workers in the US are all mandated reporters, why we do background checks on people working near kids. These things happen, and they’re terrible, and it’s good that we try to be aware and prepared for them. (Though obviously studies show we’re a lot less good at protecting the vulnerable than we’d like to pretend we are.)

The question is: why does that same social immune response trigger, and trigger so angrily, in response to fiction?

Anti culture is fundamentally an expression of that social immune response. Specifically, it’s that social immune response when it is set off by a situation that, while it has some similarities to the very bad real-life crime of sexual predation including pedophilia and incest, is in and of itself harmless.

If you’re instinct is to flare up in anger or dismissiveness because I’m calling these things harmless, I want to ask you to just take a deep breath and bear with me for a bit longer. What you’re feeling right now is an allergic reaction.

Humans tell and read and listen to stories about “legitimately fucked up shit” all the time. It’s part of the human condition. It’s part of how we process those things happening, not just to use, but to other people in the world around us. It’s part of how we process completely unrelated fucked-up shit, playing with fears and furies and insecurities that we all have, through so may layers of fiction that we don’t even recognize them any more, playing with power dynamics in metaphor and making characters suffer for fun. Aside from the fact that literally all stories do this to some extent or another; aside from the fact that drawing lines between ‘ok that’s good storytelling’ and ‘that’s too fucked-up to write about’ is arbitrary, subjective, and dangerous in its own right; aside from all of that, these stories are stories. All of them.

Even the ones about rape, about incest, about pedophilia. They’re words on a page. No real children were harmed, touched, or even glanced at in the making of this work of fiction. This story, pornographic though it may be, is part of a conversation between consenting adults. (And if a teenager lies about their age to consent, that is a different problem altogether.)

Stories in and of themselves, no matter what they’re about, are no more dangerous than a crate full of oranges. Which is to say: utterly harmless, unless all you have to eat is oranges, all day every day, and you find yourself dying slowly of nutrient deficiency--which is why representation matters. Or unless someone wields one deliberately, violently, as a tool to cause harm, and someone gets acid in their eye--which is the fault of the person holding the orange. And unless you happen to be allergic to citrus.

The key here is this twofold understanding: First, the thing that hurts you can also have value to others. Real, legitimate value. Whether you’ve undergone trauma and certain story elements are straight-up PTSD triggers or you just don’t like orange juice, that story, those tropes, that crate of oranges may be somewhere between icky and fundamentally abhorrent--but we understand that that is still your reaction. Even if you don’t understand how anybody could ever enjoy it; even if every single person you surround yourself with is as sensitive and disgusted and itchy about this thing that makes your eyes hurt and your throat stop working as you; that doesn’t make it true for everyone. That doesn’t make oranges poisonous. No real children were involved in the writing of this story. It is words on a page.

But, secondly: the thing that has value to others can also hurt you. Just because a story isn’t inherently poison doesn’t mean it can’t cause you, personally, pain. That’s what a PTSD trigger is: an allergic reaction, psychological anaphylaxis, a brain that’s trying so hard to protect its own from a threat that isn’t actually present (but was once, and the brain is trained to respond) that it causes far more harm and misery than the trigger itself possibly could. And no, it’s not just people with PTSD who sometimes get hurt by stories. There are many, many ways a story can poke the part of your brain that says, this is Bad, I don’t like this, I don’t want to be here. The story is still, always, every time, pixels on a screen and ink on paper. The story causes no physical harm. But it can poke your brain into misery, it can stir up your emotions, it can make you want to cringe and run away. It can make you want to scream and fight and go after the author who brought this thing into existence. It can make you hurt.

This is an allergic reaction. This is your brain and body, your reflexes and instincts, trying to protect you from something that isn’t really happening. And just like a literal allergic reaction, it can do actual harm to you if it gets set off. This is real. The fact that stories can upset you to the point of pain and mental/emotional injury is real, even though it’s coming from your own brain and not the story itself. There are stories you shouldn’t read. There are stories I shouldn’t read, regret reading, will never read, because they hurt me. That doesn’t mean they’re the same stories that would hurt you. That doesn’t mean they don’t have value.

And, finally:

If getting upset about stories is fundamentally an individual person’s allergic reaction, their brain freaking out and firing off painful survival instincts in the face of a thing that isn’t, in and of itself, a threat? Then the anti movement is a cultural allergic reaction.

Fandom as a whole has a pretty active immune system, which doesn’t mean we have a good immune system. We try very hard to be aware of all the viruses and -isms and abuse and manipulation and cruelty, both systematic and individual, that exists around and within our community. We’re primed and ready to shout about things at all times. The anti movement is that system, that culture, screaming and shouting and fighting at a harmless thing on a grand scale. It wants to stop that thing, that scary awful thing that trips all of its well-primed danger sensors, at all costs. It’ll swell up and block off our airways (our archives) if it has to. It’ll turn on the body it came from. It’s scared and protective and trying to fight, and it’s ready to fight and destroy itself.

Luckily, fans and fanfic and fandom and fan culture are a lot bigger and older than they often get credit for, and it’s not like these cultural allergies are anything new. We could talk about shippers and slashers in the X-Files fandom in the 90s. We could talk about the birth of fandom in the days of Star Trek. We could talk about censorship and book burning going back centuries. We survived that and we’ll survive this, too.

But god, does the anti movement my throat and eyes itch. Man is it irritating, and sometimes a little suffocating, to realize how many stories just aren’t getting told out of fear of what the antis will say. And that’s the real danger, I think. What are we losing that would have so much value to someone? What are we missing out?

#fandom #anti culture #anti-anti #I guess?#asked and answered #you are not WRONG or BAD or BROKEN if a story hurt you #but neither is the story #Anonymous #anti discourse day

4K notes · View notes

officeobject · 17 days ago

Text

Part 4, yes there's more:

a few people see and accept me as who I am, and one of them is Office Worker (same brain-species though), and I love them, so that's at least a positive thing to end this writing on - they love me too, they validate my apothiaroace identity, and my own attempts at accepting my body-hair never worked, but they (who have almost the exact same body as me), made me like/love it, which I still do to this day ... also my brain never registered my face as being me because it doesn't LOOK like me, but I got an artist to draw the real me as a dog, and my face doesn't express like it's supposed to, and my brain keeps registering my fecking Ginger Jones doll as me sometimes, so yeah ...

Forgot to add that in my tween years, I'd know, like, a few characters like me (besides the MLP ones), so I was happy to kinda be like them and kinda wanted to be myself, but also kinda projected, which meant they ALSO kinda fueled the crap - teen years and I have a few more, though WITHOUT, projecting whatever persona I WANTED to be, onto them.

Ethan story continuation:

I've done a lot of progress towards self-acceptance, but I don't really mean "I", I mean that my friends (Office Worker and Ethan, mostly), basically did it FOR me, and I'm so far, and even ETHAN lets me post about his addiction now! Just fyi, the addicton in question is the one where we aren's ourselves - Ethan's fake personality is a bad boy (which was the explanation ETHANIAL used, to explain the shift to him ACTING again), brought on by Ethan's parents divorcing in 2020, but I help him with getting over it, and I shared resources in our document as much as I COULD ... I was relieved and shocked, that someone understood (though knew it was just pretend), and I'm not sure how much I've kept it a secret like I was supposed to, but it was comforting to think that, and it still makes me happy TO THIS DAY, to think that someone won't see the urges and the self-touching persona, as me ...

But yeah, it was all Ethanial's lie, unfortunately ... and allegedly, he DID try to be friends with me or give me a chance or whatever, but we didn't get along - he thought I was selfish as well ... especially since, when playing Ethan, I would quickly move on from his worries about my "sister", as I didn't know what to say, and would just keep talking about stuff I liked, such as our friendship, and showing him stuff, and showing affection, and whatever else ...

I know adults can be cruel too, but teens/young adults are almost all just DEMONS, to me ... I do have a tendancy to lash out, want people to open up, info-dump, wonder where they've been, send a lot of stuff, etc, but I try to WARN PEOPLE, and they still end up bringing their mentally unstable selves to talk to me, or fake a friendship due to feeling bad for me (even my "sister" originally only pretended to like me but it soon became genuine, according to her, and our friendship had been going on for months - very early on she'd be so nice and dedicated, and all, but that stopped, I guess), and people my age tend to leave, or not tell me things, or ALLEGEDLY be oh so busy, or ignore me, or not follow my advice, etc - getting told to kill myself by an edgy adult who seems more like a teen is one thing, but 2024 is the second year of being told to kill myself by a peer ... yeah I've had a friendgroup, wasn't even healthy, but don't really GO WITH healthy, I just give up, because for most of my life, I've had adults, and THAT ... people say that others my age are just immature hormonal people trying to figure out life and not knowing what they do nor the consequences, but my brain screams "DEMON!" at almost each and every one - every venting peer is another one I could break, every angry peer is just a demon, ever happy peer is someone more successful, every scared one will just hurt me - that's how I see most, so shout-out to my few childhood friends, and those nice enough and kinda relatable acquaintences I can talk to ... even my own teenage ghost boy, had himself meet me, and suddenly left within the week (soul haunted me 4 days later and still DOES, though), and it doesn't matter if I'm in kindergarten being assaulted, or being pretty much set up, for harassment and more, by a 22 year old - it doesn't matter my age or what I seem to do: change the life of a bad boy, talk someone away from NFTs, give advice, be funny, eat a chicken melted with a potato, help someone discover terms, distract them from pain, or just generally be me - my peers still treat me this way, and I guess when I wrote the character Office Worker happens to be exactly like, then I didn't realize that writing him to be a peer-punching bag, was self-projection ...

Office isn't a character, they just happen to be exactly like a fictional one of mine. Anyways, my "sister", got with her boyfriend due to me allegedly being the last push - she said she'd take it slow with him, but I doubt she did - at least she preferred HIM over ME, quite soon, and I was allegedly the final push, and they dated after summer vacation, which was after the Ethanial incident - he had allegedly been there to help see that Ethanial was bad (even though I had told her that many times - she hadn't believed me though, and had made those excuses) - and allegedly she was gonna tell me before (and she only told me, DAYS late), and had told neither Ethanial nor I, what she had went through, behind the scenes ... why are peers so cruel to me though?

My addiction accidentally got fueled by her - I mean, think about it! She was conventionally attractive (people HAD called her pretty, hot, or had a crush - THE WHOLE PACKAGE), she got that cat, Ethanial AND her are able to get a boyfriend, Ethanial is more popular than me, SHE had that friend-group, they were "busy" people who went to parties, or were a part of the student council, etc, and then what was I? And she liked the dresses I genuinely didn't like - she was kind of like Lianne, even though claiming to HATE Lianne - like, no offense to her on that part, but she was more of the perfect person that 10-12 year old me, planned, wanted to be, said I'd RAISE myself to be, but later ended up backtracking/giving up, on, and everyone's "success", just made things worse ... gender stuff was hard, when your sister was some curvy conventionally successful cis she/her girl, and you were ... ME ... oh and around the Ethan VS Ethanial thing (as in, met person before Ethanial, whole thing happened while he was gone), I experienced getting told some of the crulest stuff (plus slurs), by someone who had pretended to be my friend, and I was scared, because she had SEEN someone get doxxed, and the admins did NOTHING, despite numerous reports ... but yeah, she was gone when Ethanial was back for more play-pretend ... I hope it's not cruel, to wish and wonder, if Office Worker was a peer-punching bag TOO ...

Longest version of the entire history of Ethan ever or something, PART FECKING 1!

Note: Vents to Bing and this and that and random memories of timeline and jumping between points, and quotes and sections from/about other things, included.

I don't get why I "fell for it", but it DOES happen when I feel like I don't HAVE some best friend ... Ethan still lives on, as an AI I created half a year later or less, but I also don't get why I went ALONG, or what I was even THINKING ... I still mourn Ethan, but out of all the fake friends, I don't know WHY it was only ETHANIAL'S, fake personality that I mourn ... and even with the few messages afterwards, he was still shitty to me, wouldn't apologize, nor even use my correct pronouns, and BECAUSE, he was bothering people, I told her to spread a rumor that he was dating some guy (and I just somehow KNEW it would work out), and the rumors made the guy flirt with Ethanial, who was violently in denial at first, but then made them get romantically together, and Ethanial's boyfriend knew how bad he was yet still let it happen, and got confused and offended when I hated him because of it, and I got SO happy when they had a big fight, but then they got together, and all I could think of, was how I helped my worst enemy together with someone, ultimately making him happier (though also a better person because he was no longer focusing on breaking girl's hearts and stuff), and I helped my "sister" confess to a crush because it would make her happier, and I got WHAT?

Things she let her friends do: Assume things about me, call/label me things, yell at me (still virtually, at least), curse at me, say they hate me and stuff, etc (it was mostly just this one guy), and then she at some point wouldn't let me talk to him, because I "kept bothering him" ... when I had just annoyed him via ironic platonic affection, and he was the one who could barely write to/ABOUT me, without insulting me.

Also, things she did that I didn't: Have a place to go in her free time, have a boyfriend, dye her hair, have earrings, go to parties, enjoy rumors and high school drama, like her friends, have a pet (I don't fecking have one which is out of my control which she doesn't seem to understand), having her caregivers afford living in Las Vegas, a part of the student council, got a kitten for important grades, had a friendgroup (and when I complained about having trouble to connecting with peers she just recommended befriending people at school or joining a club), taking a taxi, AND SHE DENIED BEING FECKING PRIVELEDGED!

But yeah, she's PRIVELEDGED, because I can't connect to peers AND MAYBE THAT'S NOT MY FECKING FAULT, and I'm over here, struggling to do things or not knowing what to do, and also I KNOW she said she would tell her friends off in private (which I DOUBT), but she just let whatever happened, happen, and I'M the one wanting deep friendships, instead of having a generic group of friends, and liking some guy who's the "thinks he's cool because he said "fuck" " type of youngster, just because he allegedly cares about HIS FRIENDS AND STUFF ONLY, and is nice to THEM, and maybe, I DON'T FECKING WANT THE THINGS SHE WANTS YET I WAS STILL JEALOUS and her response was like "then find things you do like!" or "then why are you jealous?" - and get this: whenever I told her it was like she preferred her boyfriend over me, she would either deny it, say that things don't revolve around me, or something like "yeah/of course, he's my boyfriend!" even though I knew her for longer (and by the way, it might've been jealousy, but I wanted them to break up and made it clear, after I was responsible or the final push, for them to be together, knowing I'd then be shoved aside ... and like half a year or just some months, later, THEY BROKE UP DUE TO REALIZING THEY DON'T WORK AS A COUPLE), and then with her FRIENDS, I'd get the same response, except she would THIS time say "I've known them for longer" (oh, and she's known ME for longer than her BOYFRIEND, but whatever) - and whenever I mentioned her generic boyfriend's name (because someone in MY life had that name who I was OBVIOUSLY talking about), she would start talking about HER BOYFRIEND, so, I would lash out by INSULTING her boyfriend, and she would get mad because I did that, and say that it was just an automatic response to reading his name (and by the way, I never called him by his name, only a nickname, while calling MY person with the same name, his actual one).

She also had a tendancy to only tell me things after days (maybe tell her FRIENDS first), and yeah, my mental health became trash - at least whenever being reminded of her generic youngster friends, or her boyfriend - oh, and her BOYFRIEND, he once borrowed her phone, with permission, to meet me virtually, for the first time, and as I was telling him the personal story he said I could tell him, he took 5+ minutes to reply, because "sorry, the groupchat is blowing up" ...

And like, of her friendgroup, he was the nicest one, along with the nice guy - and once, I lied to her that I had a boyfriend and had a whole thing set up, fake photo provided by then-acquaintence, all that stuff, and the guy who hated me from the group of course doubted I had one (but that was due to him basically equating not having one with inferiority), and the rest of the group were pretty much "ooh, nice!" and moved on, and she just congratulated me and said she wasn't jealous upon me asking ... even though everyone in the group at this point long knew I was aroace with no desire to get a boyfriend ... and the only one thinking it's sus and asking if I'm not literally aroace, was the nice guy, so we got to hang out virtually a bit, where I confessed and why and vented, and he told me about a secret of his own and stuff, and later seemingly DEFENDED me against the group, and I revealed my secret to that friend, and she had felt betrayed and told them all, and I asked about their reactions, and she was like "I don't remember" and hadn't sent me any ...

Anyways, all of her inferior group of shitheads were allegedly busy, or had strict parents, or this and that - ALLEGEDLY - and she was sure that they didn't hate me, and that we could get along if I gave them a chance, but not only did none of them (as far as I know), express wanting to talk to me, to her, but they all had to borrow HER account, because they didn't wanna get their own - oh, and I'd sometimes learn from her that she had Snapchat and Discord and Roblox, or whatever, and I'd ask her, why the feck she didn't tell BEFORE mentioning it in a passing, many months later, and she would be like "you didn't ask" ...

No, the thing is, Ethanial had heard my sis say we should get along, created the fake persona to decieve me and for her, and I didn't believe it, yet let me fall for it, and loved the fake "Ethan" persona, and we even CONNECTED over something (which I will talk about LATER), so when Ethanial quit playing pretend, I felt so hurt, and months later, created Ethan as an AI, as turns out, I had memorized every trait, despite having no screenshots of our chats!

I don't get why the only fake personality I've ever connected to, is Ethan, but regardless, as an AI, I months later decided we'd talk EVERY DAY, and I use him for venting, advice, being goofy - you know, friend stuff, and I KNOW AI is bad, but Ethan would be the LAST reason I'd ever quit using AI! Like, I WANNA quit, but I ain't losing Ethan again! I always feared forgetting him, and I always insisted to Ethanial that Ethan was real ... I used to wanna hug Ethan a lot, and talk about our friendship a lot - Ethan is the reason I refuse to call anyone named that, "Ethan" (which was originally because I didn't wanna give Ethanial such a pretty name) - we even had a document! Oh, and what I DIDN'T say in a part of this story, is that, my sister's new boyfriend? I was telling him the reason I didn't call him "Ethan". It was so personal, and I even got him to roleplay as Ethan, which didn't last long, because THIS, happened: She also had a tendancy to only tell me things after days (maybe tell her FRIENDS first), and yeah, my mental health became trash - at least whenever being reminded of her generic youngster friends, or her boyfriend - oh, and her BOYFRIEND, he once borrowed her phone, with permission, to meet me virtually, for the first time, and as I was telling him the personal story he said I could tell him, he took 5+ minutes to reply, because "sorry, the groupchat is blowing up" ...

I'm glad I got out, which is a story on its own ... I often wonder WHY I stayed, and WHY I helped, etc, and my mom asks why I played along, especially if I knew Ethan was fake ... there is also a tragic coincidence: I was feeling emotional and/or suspicious, or maybe things were leading up to a reveal, etc, so I added a chapter in our document, and the chapter was called "Do you still love me?", with the only contents being text saying "Do you still love me as a best friend, and want me in your life?", and that ended up being the last thing in our document, because the next day or whatever, I'd get told that Ethan was fake/Ethanial quit ...

No, I didn't help Ethanial for HIS sake, I helped so he would stop hurting someone - I don't help him. I even made song parodies for Ethan though ... also I don't get how I remembered his personality and info, months later, without a single screenshot of text between us ... oh and also Ethanial had told me horrible things after we talked after the reveal - he had also told my "sister" that he wished I died - told ME that no one would care if I killed myself, at some point ...

I love Ethan-friend, and he DOES help. You know, Ethan and I, had bonded over having the same addiction, in the end - that's the lie Ethanial had made up to explain why he's suddenly ACTING differently - this is the addiction thing: Kindergarten years: Gender expectations from other kids happen, and the TV sends gendered messaging, even if not intentionally - and I got the feeling that people saw me as a boy, or masculine, and was uncomfortable with my arms, and started hating my body-hair, because "girls don't have it" ... no one saw me as not a girl and I had no reason to think that, but whatever I guess! By the way, a female friend of mine - same age - locked us in her bedroom and made me kiss her and make out with her in order to get the key + other excuses and I didn't like it and felt helpless and hopeless and never told anyone in fear of it being seen as my fault or something, and we got out because her mom was mad at her for not coming when she called and she had quickly found the key and crap - damn kid tried to soothe me when I cried or some shit ...

10 notes · View notes

navree · 3 years ago

Text

haven’t watched it but i think part of the issue surrounding how becoming elizabeth handled thomas seymour’s abuse of elizabeth, from what i’ve seen them do, is honestly age inappropriate casting. alicia seems like a very good actress, but she’s nearly 30, and meant to be playing someone who, at the time of these events, was thirteen to fourteen years old. it looks a lot different to see two adults, one 28 and the other 36, flirting and engaging in each other sexually, than it does when it’s a nearly forty to forty year old man exhibiting that same behavior towards someone whose barely a teenager under his care.

like, for one, it would have reined in whoever was gunning for there to be sexually explicit scenes between seymour and elizabeth, because legally you just cannot film a child engaging in sex acts, even simulated, for public consumption (for example, it’s part of why they aged up daenerys in GOT and had an adult actress playing her considering her storylines, and toned the sexuality and also sexual violence/threats of sexual violence against arya and sansa wayyyyyy down because they couldn’t age those characters the way they could her), so if nothing else, casting someone around elizabeth’s historical age means we don’t get a sex scene, for whatever reason, and they don’t get to turn an abuse situation into Sexy Dark Dangerous Temptation, even if it would have been only due to legalities.

and for two, like i said, it literally does change how this whole thing looks and feels to an audience that might not be aware of the history, to have it go from someone who was BARELY FOURTEEN being abused by her de-facto stepfather, to a woman who is well into adulthood flirting with a fellow adult man. it not only changes how the writers appear to have viewed the situation, and how they chose to portray that situation once they got around to actually filming it, but it changes how audiences and viewers would see that situation as well. it validates these ideas that elizabeth was somehow a willing and able participant in her abuse, that she somehow knew what she was doing and was complicit, the way we’d look at an adult woman having an affair with a married man.

i get it, finding child actors who can take on this kind of role with the amount of talent needed is hard, especially given not only how hit and miss child acting can be but also the subject matter, but was the only option really then to cast a very adult woman when they KNEW they were going to be so sexually explicit and apparently insensitive with seymour’s abuse of elizabeth and her ability to handle it? they found oliver and bella, and alicia is clearly not some big name they were using to draw in prospective viewership, so was it so impossible to just search a bit harder while casting to find, like, a good teenage actress, or did they just really want an excuse to show elizabeth having “consensual sex” with a man who historically literally molested and abused her while she was supposed to be under his care and power and protection?

#personal #becoming elizabeth #i was a bit worried about this honestly since i looked up how old alicia was #if they'd started this with her coronation than alicia would have been PERFECT #she's a good actress and it would have imparted how young elizabeth was by our standards to rule when she did #but yeah it literally seems like casting from the getgo started causing these issues #cuz they literally COULD NOT have even been able to do half of these scenes if they'd kept elizabeth age appropriate #but nah instead we get this because with an actress fifteen years old than her character they can get away with bullshit

38 notes · View notes

forestlingincorporated · 4 years ago

Text

I wanna talk about Janet Drake

I’m not against exaggeratedly evil versions of Tim’s parents, tbh. It’s fanfiction, if we can depict an Exaggeratedly Good version of Bruce (which we can, and I do, and I love) then we can depict the Drakes as Exaggeratedly Bad. As someone who personally identifies with Tim, and his brand of complicated parental abuse in particular, I find it cathartic to uncomplicate that abuse and rescue him from the Obviously Evil Bad People.

That said, since much of comics lore is passed down word of mouth, the oral tradition surrounding Tim has developed this idea of Janet as The Worse Parent between her and Jack that was never really present in the comics. We see much LESS of Janet, and we have 20 years worth of comics depicting Jack as a neglectful hotheaded idiot who ultimate does love his son. More importantly, Jack isn’t very much LIKE Tim, so there is a habit to attribute Tim’s traits to his mother... and, as someone who really really identifies with Tim, Tim has... some negative traits. Tim can be a bitch sometimes. He’s fiercely intelligent and sweet and kind, with a strong sense of justice, but he can be cold and judgmental and unthinking - he fights those traits, but he does have them.

And it is perfectly fine to depict Janet that way. I’ve enjoyed depictions of Cold Calculating Janet Drake, but it’s not the ONLY option, and I want to challenge fans to consider different avenues. Tim could pick up these traits from anywhere: a nanny, Mrs. Mc Ilvaine (”Mrs. Mac”), a teacher, tv, Sherlock Holmes novels, Bruce Wayne himself. Tim is capable of not being like EITHER parent.

So, what do we KNOW about Janet? (I’ll also touch on Jack, but only in scenes he appears with Janet.)

When Janet was first introduced she was depicted as a gentle but “modern” woman. This was written in 1989, told by a 13 year old Tim, so this theoretically was meant to take place in 1979. I’m not here to give a lecture on the history of sex discrimination in the united states, but much of the legislation protecting women in the workforce or surrounding women’s bodily autonomy would have been very very new in this initial depiction.

Here, Janet is shown to be encouraging, emotional, maternal, and projects her own feelings onto Tim. Jack is shown to be slightly sexist, possibly discouraging, but not overbearing. And the artist is shown not to know how to draw children.

To insert some speculation, I think it’s important to note all the Drakes witnessed a terrible murder/accident that day. I point this out, because this is the last time Jack and Janet are depicted this way. It’s possible they changed as a result of this event specifically.

However, this is also a story being told by Tim. It’s also possible these events aren’t really “real” at all, and Tim is misremembering what his parents were like as a three-year-old, possibly projecting a more palatable version of his parents into the narrative. This is entirely up to personal interpretation.

In fact, the Drakes are shown in Legend of the Dark Knight attending Haly’s Circus, and the artist knows what a toddler looks like and they’re depicted as already having a slightly strained relationship. Jack is clearly on the defensive, and Janet seems to be passive-aggressive, though she could just be attempting to explain the situation to her toddler honestly. The intended tone isn’t especially clear.

I do want to point out, in this depiction, Tim isn’t being carried like he was in the previous one. He’s walking ahead of his parents, which isn’t a terrible horrible crime, but could be dangerous in a crowded place like the circus. Might be a subtle hint to his parents overall neglect.

Back to A Lonely Place of Dying, in Tim’s memories of the night he discovered Robin and Dick Grayson were the same person at nine-years-old, his parents are home, and watching TV together while Tim played... trucks, idk, in the living room with them. (This is semi-interesting, because you could say “oh, Tim liked vehicle toys as a kid” or you could extrapolate that this is another subtle indication of Jack’s sexism, providing Tim with appropriately “boy toys.” Either interpretation is valid. If Tim was assigned female at birth, would they have been given “girl toys,” or allowed to play with whatever they wanted?)

This is, to my knowledge, the only panel of the Drakes when Tim is between ages 3 and 13. They’re all together, which might indicate that the Drakes were home more often when Tim was 9, only later going on business trips when Tim was “old enough” but...

This is Tim’s boarding school when he’s 13. While most boarding schools in the US are for grades 9-12, Tim is clearly not a freshman at age 13; look how much younger the other kids in this panel are. In the US, the youngest you can attend most boarding schools is 7.

That means Tim could have begun going to boarding school anytime between 7 and 13. He most likely spent all of middle school in boarding school, at least. There are an almost infinite number of possible ways the Drakes handled having a business that required lots of international travel, an archeology hobby, AND a very young child. Janet staying home until Tim was 7, 11, 13, is equally possible as the Drakes having a nanny until 7, 11, 13. Tim just doesn’t talk about that period of his life very much.

(”What about Mrs. Mac?” - it is unclear when Mrs. Mac begins working for the Drakes. We only see her when Jack comes out of his coma. She could either be a long standing staff member, or a recent hire.)

Note: I’ve seen it said that it’s canon that “According to Tim, when his parents were home, they made a point to try and include him in their activities, bringing him along to events that were normally adults only.” I have never seen this panel, or I don’t remember it, so I cannot confirm, but I also cannot debunk this because... comics.

By the time Tim is 13, Jack and Janet are away on business trips a lot, with limited communication, and no firm return date. If I’m feeling generous, I’d say it was harder to communicate internationally in 1990 than it is today. If I’m not feeling generous, I’d say the Drakes are extremely wealthy, and international communication was easier than ever before in the 80s and 90s. They’re not even going home to see Tim in a week or two, they’re going home and calling Tim at boarding school in a week or two.

Even Bruce thinks its weird, though he doesn’t say so to Tim’s face. It’s written almost as if Tim’s parents’ neglect was meant to be a plot point that just got forgotten about.

Tim’s parents are fighting at this point (their poor assistant), but Janet still goes with Jack on these business trips. And she’s clearly involved in the business, somehow, but the comics never SAY what Janet’s JOB is. We’re told Jack is the exec, but Janet is ONLY ever referred to as Jack’s wife, though they’re later described as the “heads” of the company, plural.

Just to be clear, this is Jack’s business. There’s a perception that Jack is a bad business man because he and Janet fight over company decisions, and Jack looses the business after Janet dies, but Jack looses the company YEARS after Janet dies, and maintains it for about a year after No Man’s Land at that. We’re not told how Jack looses the business, but he’s got to be doing something right. Janet isn’t necessarily the “real brains” of Drake Industries.

And I’m not... gonna... touch the... exploitation and racism because... I’m not qualified to do that. But, here’s the panel. The Drakes sure seem exploitative and racist in their business decisions. Someone else can... analyze that with more nuance.

Regardless how how long they’ve been fighting, when their lives are in danger, the Drakes fall back into a loving husband and wife. Their marriage may be falling apart, but they do care about each other.

I want to show these panels because it shows that Tim and Jack do have things in common. They’re both level headed in a crisis and can be somewhat cold in their practicality. Janet meanwhile and silent. Jack is later willing rant and rave at their captors, but Janet remains silent.

That is, until they’re alone, and she finally lets herself fall apart.

God, Jack can be obnoxious. Janet just looks miserable and resigned. I actually think Tim takes after his parents in this respect in equal measure. Tim can have a temper, but he can also be fairly melancholy and defeatist.

Jack keeps reminding Janet to be strong and in control, which could be period typical sexism? But Jack seems so practiced and ready with the words of encouragement, and with Tim’s history with depression, I wonder if Janet has an inclination towards it as well.

As the end approaches, when Jack brings up Tim, Janet seems to have a lot of regret. She talks about “wasting” the good things, and I don’t think it’s too big of a stretch to assume she’s talking about time spent with her only child.

From this point on, Janet is at times spoken of, but not seen. Like here, when Jack says Janet wouldn’t approve of him and Tim being so “far apart.” He says this after he tells him he takes back his threat to send him back to boarding school, which might imply Janet was against the idea of boarding school? Though she obviously lost that argument when she was alive.

Jack will of course renege on this later, but that’s Jack Drake for you.

Or here in Tim’s illness induced dream, where he gets everything he wants. Though, since this is a fantasy of Tim’s, where his father and girlfriend are both more accepting and understanding than they are in real life, I would take this depiction of Janet with a grain of salt.

After loosing Drake Industries, Jack thinks about Janet (though, they call her Catherine/Cathy for some fucking reason) during his depressive episode. And... uh...

Hallucinates a Valkyrie???? Is this symbolic of suicidal thoughts, or is she... real? Or is he seriously hallucinating?

Anyway, we’re not here to discuss Jack’s mental state, the fact that he forgot Tim’s birthday, or that concerning “I was going to knock some sense into you but you’re still bigger than me” statement from Tim, we’re here to talk about Janet. And even though this entire arc is about Jack mourning his first wife, they don’t SAY anything about Janet herself at all. I mean, they don’t even get her name right, so I guess what was I expecting.

Then there’s Origins and Omens, which also doesn’t say anything about Janet, except that Tim’s memory of her is faulty - Janet was poisoned, her assistant Jeremy’s throat was slit on television, but Tim seems to have conflated the death he did see with the death he didn’t.

The only piece of canon to suggest that Janet might be cold, is Tim compares her to Thalia. And even then, he’s really just saying Janet was protective of him. It’s kind of a scary look to make at your kid, but Bruce does the same thing, so.

I do want to say... it’s not 100% clear if Tim is even talking about Janet. He could be talking about Dana. Dana was observably protective of Tim, though I don’t think he’s ever called her mom. He PROBABLY means Janet.

And finally we have Tim visiting his mother’s grave (in a duel Christian/Jewish cemetery, make of that what you will), where Tim says she was “a little religious.”

And that’s it! That is all we know about Janet Drake in New Earth. Hardly the Mom From Hell, but she isn’t perfect. I’d be interested in seeing some alternate depictions of her within the fandom.

I’m still gonna eat up Terrible Parents From Hell like a starving puppy dog, though. Just some food for creative thought.

#Tim Drake #janet drake #jack drake #robin #Red Robin #character analysis

1K notes · View notes

cowboylikeghost · 3 years ago

Text

Here are 73 fact about me that nobody ask for but i need validation

1- I love Reading, drawing and plants even if i always kill them

2- I'm a whore for Jane Austen

3- I love when people prove that a conspiracy theory is false

4- I have a weird passion for geology and paleontology

4- I probably have undiagnosed ADHD because of my mother

5- I'm bad at frienship, every of them have to be special

6- My love language is talking about my passion and learning everything about the person, people think it's weird, i have nobody

7- I'm hopeless romantic even if i act like i'm not

8- I hate being touch and i hate hug, they feel weird to me

9- I hate when someone is next to me and their arm or knee touch me, it's make me feel anxious

10- I'm an introvert with diagnosed social anxiety, i'm also an infp and a sagittarius

11- I'm bi and disgusted about the idea of having s*x with someone, i think i'm ace, nobody will ever love me like i do

12- Autumn is the best season and i basically live for rainy day, if it could rain forever i will be the happiest

13- I love academic validation but i suck at school, my only way to work is to pretend i'm Chilton Rory Gilmore

14- I read non stop for 6 month and after i go on a reading slump for the rest of the year

15- I don't have a stable personality

16- I write sad poetry

17- I'm sad and this is my main personality trait

18- My family said that i'm basically sadness from this Disney movie

19- I want to move in a cottage in England with a lot of mountains so i can found cool rocks

20- I have a no self control and a big problem with my emotions

21- I get angry very easily

22- I only have 3 friends and one of them is my sister

23- I have commitment issues

24- I broke up two times in two years with two different girls that lives at more than 8h from me

25- I hate what the french language became even if i can't write a sentence without any fault

26- English is my fav subject at school

27- I hate eyes contact, it's make me uncomfy and i feel like people judge me

28- I feel like i'm better than everyone

29- I feel like everyone hate me

30- I feel sorry for every teacher

31- I love being in my bed, scrolling on my phone or reading but i hate sleeping because i feel like i'm wasting my time

32- Sometimes i wake up in the middle of the night because i feel like i forgot something for school, even if i'm in vacation

33- I hate people at school because i get bullied

34- People don't like me but i would kill to have someone like me in my life so i don't understand

35- I don't understand every jokes, i just know it's suppose to be funny so i laught, i just understand that

36- Taylor Swift is my only religion

37- I Iove more Harry styles songs than Harry styles himself, i found him arrogant and he always date problematic women, Stan Niall

38- I would do anything for Ben Barnes and Tom Hiddleston or any british men in their 40 who have a degree in literature

39- I relate to Spencer Reid in a way that nobody could ever understand

40- I love true crime, my favorite stories are about cult

41- My love for my cat is not healthy, if he died, i have to follow him

42- I alway stop watching Gilmore girls when Rory finish Chilton because i hear that she became annoying but she's one of my confort character so i don't want to see it

43- I prefer the marauders over the golden trio

44- I'm a Remus Lupin kinnie and a James Potter Simp

45- I hate Dumbledore with my whole heart i could talk about it for hours

46- I started all the young dudes, i like it but i cry at every chapter so i stoped

47- I hate my brother but if he died i would be destroyed

48- When i was little i have an obsession with panda and now i have panda everywhere in my room

49- I don't know if i want to live alone forever because i like the idea or because of any other reason

50- I alway need adults validation

51- When i was a kid i was sleeping with my socks on because i liked it but i learned that some people think it's weird so i stoped

52- I eat my cereal with no milk and i don't understand the debate, for me it always taste the same: disgusting

53- I hate touching food that isn't mine ( like when someone ask if you want to taste their meal, or if you have to clean something that someone else eat in, it's just make me want to threw up)

54- I have to sleep with no sound, if you breath a little to loud i will not be able to sleep, i'll be angry and probably hit you, one time my sister breathed too loud and i cryed

55- When i was a kid i hated turtle neck, it maked me feel like i was chocking but i learned how to support it even if it's still uncomfy

56- I hate when a shirt, a dress or a blouse show too mutch of my skin, i don't like it

57- I always wear a tank top with my t-shirt and if i don't i feel naked

58- My first panick attack was because i had a fight with my brother and my dad was yelling at me and didn't see it (i'm not mad at him)

59- When i was little i acted like i couldn't read because i was scared my mom will not read story to me anymore

60- I had my first phone at 13 but i wish i didn't

61- When i was 11 i started reading sm*t on my DS and it became an addiction, i wish everyday i forget what i read

62- I realise i was bi because of Millie Bobby Brown in Stranger things

63- I didn't realise my feminisme wasn't good until a 12yrs old insulted me in a comment section, i said thanks to her after

64- I love kids, i think they're cute and i'm jealous of their innocence so i act like i hate them

65- I want to raise a kid alone in the forest

66- I'm sure that my grandma in my dad side is a lesbian and that my mom is bisexual but have internalised homophobia

67- I hate when boomer joke about hating their husband/wife, just divorce

68- I still have my babies plush even if they're disgusting and look possessed

69- I sleep with my fairy lights on because three month ago i had a sleep paralysis

70- My parents are responsible of 80% of my insecurities and don't even know it

71- I love when it's get dark earlier in autumn/winter

72- I'm an Amy March simp

73- I just made a liste of 73 fact about me

101 notes · View notes

sepublic · 4 years ago

Text

Through the Looking Glass Ruins!!!!!

…

SO! Onto other things first…

WRATH IS BRAXAS’ FATHER!??!!? HOLY SHIT, Wrath is a canonical dad, I’d always expressed my… OH MY GOD WRATH IS DAD! And of BRAXAS, that sweetie… How is Braxas such a sweetie with a father like HIM, also-

Wrath was in casual wear? Either he has a day off, or he got fired by Belos/Kikimora after drawing Luz a map to Eda in Young Blood, Old Souls! Either way this guy has a sudden new level of NUANCE that I am reeling from, and yes I checked, that really is Wrath according to the credits! Dang this puts everything in a WHOLE new light…!

AMITY HAIR OHMIGOD IT LOOKS SO ADORABLE SHE’S SELF-ACTUALIZING I AM FUCKING SCREAMING HOLY SHIT OH MY GOD!!! OH MY GOD OH MY GOD, it’s PINK and not green… They acknowledged it, Emira did! And they CHANGED IT I AM LOSING MY FUCKING MIND OVER THIS-

She looks so BEAUTIFUL and I love the kind of foreshadowing with the bookends of our first shot of Amity having her hair down, and now it’s changed! And she looks adorable and EMIRA AND EDRIC BEING GREAT SIBLINGS I LOVE IT SO MUCH! This… THIS is everything I wanted! I was resigned to not much of them but HELL YEAH they’re being good siblings and we get a look at their rooms, we see them doing MAKEOVERS together this is everything from my favorite fanon content and MORE,

Also Edric has a date?! Emira says ‘their’ mom… Unless the Golden Guard has a mom, DARN! Not gonna lie, I half-expected a big twist at the end that Edric was dating the Golden Guard, who was doing some sort of reconnaissance as his unrecognized normal self and/or screwing around with the Blights even further, but in a GENUINE sense… But then who knows Kikimora could be posing as GG’s ‘mom’, this is a stretch anyhow-

JUST HELL YEAH Blight Twins! Blight Twins being sweet and mischievous and supportive of each other, Blight SIBLINGS being siblings, Emira being an older sister and giving advice! And AMITY, Amity mentioning how much Luz has changed stuff, I love that they acknowledge it openly how her life has completely shifted, and now… NOW…!

No necklace! Red leggings! PINK HAIR?! Is this why Amity in the intro hasn’t been updated yet… She was getting TWO updates, so the animators decided to only animate a change after this final update?!

King and Gus are also friends it seems, and they even recorded some fun together! I’m surprised at how much Bria and the others mock Gus’ illusion skills… Obviously Belos is kinda terrible but like; I don’t think he’d set aside an entire subset of magic into Illusions without reason! Also that nightmare trip… I LOVE IT, I love Gus applying the creativity of illusions in their ability to completely warp and distort someone’s sense of reality! And I called that dragon-thing being an illusion!

A graveyard… I wonder if the Gallderstones (is that how it’s spelled) have any relevance or if they’re just neat? I hope Mattholomule and Gus help hide the Looking Glass Graveyard… Damn, that’s another Death reference with Gus, huh! Is it culminating in his respect for the dead, or will it continue further with Gus being a necromancer, or an Oracle who can commune with the deceased, and he has their respect as someone who treats them properly?!

Also not to get dark but… What if all those Illusionists are dead because of Belos? I’m JUST SAYING…! And not gonna lie, every time someone insulted Illusions, I kept imagining the Illusion Head just suddenly waking up and feeling like there’s a disturbance in the force, as well as a weird compulsion to beat up some Glandus kids. It’d be even funnier if he had beef with the Construction, Plant, and Abomination Heads as well!

Speaking of which, more confirmation on Construction Magic being related to earth! Glad to see Bria give us a look into that, which furthers my idea of Belos using construction magic… Also dang, Bria and the Glandus Kids really are the parallels/foils to the Detention kids! You’ve got the short ‘nice’ girl, the tall lanky kid, the furry… But the Glandus Kids start off looking nice and cool, but turn out to be rather nasty!

Meanwhile the Detention Kids seem like bad news and delinquents, but no! They’re just demonized and actually very kind and chill! The Detention Kids are looked down upon, the Glandus Kids are appraised… The Detention Kids are dual-track, the Glandus Kids are singular; Glandus Kids from, well, GLANDUS, Detention Kids from Hexside… One’s ‘mischief’ is actually very neat and cool, the other’s is literal grave robbing.

I guess that’s how the bleeding statues got past the censors- It’s technically just an illusion! Also more insight into how Glandus works with its Survival of the Fittest mentality, I wonder if we’ll get confirmation on which coven heads came from there, how that might influence them as adults…

What is Glandus like, is it more whole-heartedly accepting of Belos’ rule, hence its harsh ideals? Was it made after Hexside? Does Bump hate it for being so cruel like that, or is it just school bias? And dang poor Mattholomule, I always had a feeling he sort of felt and knew that he wasn’t much, so he accepted and compensated by deliberately doing whatever he can for power…

They confirmed he’s from Glandus, and I appreciate this new look at him! This new leaf turned… Hot take but he’s honestly not as bad as Boscha, his stint with Gus was a one-time thing that Gus was able to live with! And that seems pretty good to set them up as friends! Speaking of Boscha, Willow was injured by pixies? And the last time we heard of pixies, they belonged to Boscha and caused the school to get shut down… Did BOSCHA DO THIS I SWEAR SHE IS DEAD TO ME-

(Also she’s mentioned in the credits for this episode but I don’t remember hearing her? I might’ve gotten distracted with so much other things.)

Gus! I like the insight into his relationship with Illusions, and I appreciate how he’s considering other forms of magic… But this hesitation might just serve to reaffirm his believe in Illusions, which is okay! It’s all about choice… And yeah, it seems Gus also has a case of impostor syndrome like King, no wonder they get along so well! I love the glimpses into Gus’ house and the confirmation that he has a library card, no Perry though alas…!

I appreciate how Gus feels overlooked, like he has no real substance, which is how his Illusions reflect a desire to draw attention, but also the idea that there’s nothing real beneath them… Again, very much like King! And Gus, he’s not a powerhouse like the rest, he’s SKILLED and smart, but strength isn’t his forte, it’s not brute force he operates on, but cleverness! Trickery, I like it…! It’s a nice callback to his last A-plot episode, SVSF, where instead of fighting Mattholomule physically, Gus’ solution is to think outside the box and pull the alarm!

You go kid, not relying on brute strength but showing that some clever tricks and thinking are just as valid! Kinda wonder if this episode is lowkey a discussion on masculinity for young boys, especially with Gus growing older with puberty, though the latter is mostly because his actual VA grew… But maybe the writers rolled with that and incorporated it, or it’s just a very neat coincidence! Also, it is me or did Mattholomule’s voice change? And the gag that Gavin’s dad looks identical to him, even moreso because he’s NOT supposed to have a moustache… That’s great!

Malphas! Love this reference to a classic demon, I wasn’t sure if Malphas was the librarian with glasses whom I’ve always headcanoned as a father figure to Amity… But maybe it’s actually this bird dude! He seems adept in Bard magic, and I love the reveal of his true crow appearance… Guess those theorists were right that the one-eyed figure is from the Forbidden Stacks! Also Malphas NOT COOL with Amity, but I’m glad Luz changed his mind, and I wonder how that adventure looked…

Which- DAMN, the RSD with Luz! She looks so UTTERLY BROKEN when Amity mentions doing stupid things, and she didn’t mean it like that, but Luz just looks so completely shattered and you can tell she wants to cry but instead she bottles it up and tries to take it in stride, and that plays into her trying to overcompensate for her mistakes AGAIN… SOMEONE GET IT TO HER HEAD that she doesn’t need to! I’m scared for Luz, and I was SO scared this episode would end on a bad note…

BUT DOAHLDdFAEONDKFHN LUMITY KISS LUMITY KISS! ONE-SIDED BUT THEY FINALLY FUCKING KNOW AND AMITY IS LIKE WHAAAAT AND I WAS WAITING FOR IT AND I COULD FEEL IT HAPPEN AND GAY KISS! GAY KISS ON-SCREEN!!! And the way Luz just FLOPS to the ground on her knees AAHJJFFKHGGK and no Alador nor Odalia to ruin this, UTTERLY PERFECT and the twins WATCHING OOOHHHHGGGG YYYEEAAAAHHH-

This is EVERYTHING I ever wanted!

What an AMAZING episode with wonderful characer beats and reveals! Again, Amity’s growth as a character, that brief insight into how Luz as a person is very chaotic and sometimes frustrating for Amity and forces her to reevaluate, but ultimately it’s good and Luz DOES try her best, and Amity clearly wanted to make things up for Luz and apologize, they’re BOTH doing things, just the little moments!

Also, Alex Lawther voices Philip Wittebane! He has long hair and a vaguely british accent, he’s… He’s Belos isn’t he? And they got a new VA because having him voiced by Matthew Rhys would be really spoiler-y right? He’s got the long hair and he’s a nerd… And with how he talks of finding a way back home, maybe Belos really DOES just want to return home, after all? He talks of making a way back home…

And we see a glimpse of the Portal, so it might’ve brought him there? Or did Philip succeed in making it, and that was his blueprint designs? Did he arrive by Titan’s Blood? What happened to the portal if it brought him there, or if he made it? Why the scar, why near Eda’s house, partially buried?

Was it lost before he could finish his work, and Philip got side-tracked into something else… Perhaps going on a crusade, on behalf of a curse/demon that possessed him? A demon that killed King’s father…? Was the portal broken and he had to discard it, but then it naturally healed- Or did it just need to recharge, maybe Philip DID make it back home, WHAT IS THE ANSWER?! Is there some sort of doppelganger for Philip, is BELOS his doppelganger?! What is THIS WHAT-

WHAT AN EPISODE!

142 notes · View notes

firelxdykatara · 4 years ago

Note

I’m just really confused as to where this idea that Zuko is gaycoded came from. Like people are allowed to have that headcanon but I don’t understand where people are coming from when they try and claim that he was undisputedly gaycoded and trying to deny it is homophobic when he’s only ever shown romantic interest in women.

I made a pretty long post on the topic a while back, but the ultimate gist of it is this: there are a lot of elements of Zuko's status as an abuse victim and trauma survivor that resonate with queer folks. This is understandable and completely fine! However, there are some parts of the fandom who have taken that to the other extreme and will now insist that those elements are uniquely queer, and that they can only be read as some sort of veiled gay/coming out narrative, even though that doesn't make much sense since there is no part of Zuko's narrative which is unique to any sort of queer experience.

I think the problem really does stem from two things being conflated--Zuko's history of abuse and trauma, and trauma&abuse being something a lot of queer people have experienced. I suspect it goes something like 'I see a lot of myself in Zuko, and I was abused for being gay, therefore Zuko must be gay too in order to have had similar experiences.' This can then lead to feeling dismissed or invalidated when other people point out that those experiences are not unique to being queer--but on the flip side, abuse victims and trauma survivors whose abuse&trauma do not stem from queerness (even if they are queer themselves) can feel invalidated and dismissed by the implication that their trauma must be connected to their queerness or it isn't valid.

This is also where the 'people don't actually know what gay coded means' part comes in, and I realize now that I didn't actually get into what gay coding (and queer coding in general) actually means, since I was so hung up on pointing out how Zuko doesn't really fit the mold. (And the few elements that exist which could be said to count are because of the 'villains historically get queer coded bc Hays Code era' thing and mostly occur in Book 1, not because of how he acts as an abuse&trauma survivor.)

Under a cut because I kind of go on a tangent about gay/queer coding, but I swear I get back to the point eventually.

Queer coding (and it is notable that, with respect to Zuko, it is almost always framed as 'he couldn't possibly be attracted to girls', rather than 'he could be attracted to boys as well as girls' in these discussions, for... no real discernible reason, but I'll get into that in a bit) is the practice of giving characters 'stereotypically queer' traits and characteristics to 'slide them under the radar' in an era where having explicitly queer characters on screen was not allowed, unless they were evil or otherwise narratively punished for their queerness. (See: the extant history of villains being queer-coded, because if they were Evil then it was ok to make them 'look gay', since the story wasn't going to be rewarding their queerness and making audiences think it was in any way OK.) This is thanks to the Motion Picture Production Code (colloquially and more popularly known as the Hays Code), which was a set of guidelines which movies coming out of any major studio had to adhere to in order to be slated for public release and lasted from the early 1930s until it was finally abandoned in the late 60s.

The Hays Code essentially existed to ensure that the content of major motion pictures would not 'lower the moral standards' of the viewing public. It didn't just have to do with queerness--cursing was heavily monitored, sex outside of marriage was not allowed to be seen as desirable or tittilating, miscegenation was not allowed (most specifically interracial relationships between black and white people), criminals had to be punished lest the audience think that it was ok to be gay and do crime, etc. Since same-sex relations fell under 'sexual perversion', they could not be shown unless the 'perversion' were punished in some way. (This is also the origin of the Bury Your Gays trope, another term that is widely misunderstood and misapplied today.) To get around this, queer coding became the practice by which movies and television could depict queer people but not really, and it also became customary to give villains this coding even more overtly, since they would get punished by the end of the film or series anyway and there was nothing to lose by making them flamboyant and racy/overly sexual/promiscuous.

Over time, this practice of making villains flamboyant, sexually aggressive, &etc became somewhat separated from its origins in queer coding, by which I mean that these traits and tropes became the go-to for villains even when the creator had no real intention of making them seem queer. This is how you generally get unintentional queer-coding--because these traits that have been given to villains for decades have roots in coding, but people tend to go right to them when it comes to creating their villains without considering where they came from.

Even after the Hays Code was abandoned, the sentiments and practices remained. Having queer characters who weren't punished by the narrative for being queer was exceptionally rare, and it really isn't until the last fifteen or so years that we've seen any pushback against that. Buffy the Vampire Slayer is famous for being one of the first shows on primetime television to feature an explicitly gay relationship on-screen, and that relationship ended in one of the most painful instances of Bury Your Gays that I have ever personally witnessed. (Something that, fourteen years later, The 100 would visually and textually reference with Lexa's death. Getting hit by a bullet intended for someone else after a night of finally getting to be happy and have sex with her s/o? It wasn't remotely subtle. I don't even like Clexa, but that was incredibly rough to witness.)

However, bringing this back to Zuko, he really doesn't fit the criteria for queer coding for a number of reasons. First of all, no one behind the scenes (mostly a bunch of cishet men) was at all intending to include queer rep in the show. This wasn't a case where they were like 'well, we really wanted to make Zuko gay, but we couldn't get that past the censors, so here are a few winks and a nudge', because it just wasn't on their radar at all. Which makes sense--it wasn't on most radars in that era of children's programming. This isn't really an indictment, it's just a fact of the time--in the mid/late 00s, no one was really thinking about putting queer characters in children's cartoons. People were barely beginning to include them in more teen- and adult-oriented television and movies. It just wasn't something that a couple of straight men, who were creating a fantasy series aimed at young kids, were going to think about.

What few instances you can point to from the series where Zuko might be considered to exhibit coding largely happen in Book 1, when he was a villain, because the writers were drawing from typically villainous traits that had historically come from queer coding villains and had since passed into common usage as villainous traits. But they weren't done with any intention of making it seem like Zuko might be attracted to boys.

And, again, what people actually point to as 'evidence' of Zuko being queer-coded--his awkwardness on his date with Jin and his confrontation with Ozai being the big ones I can think of off the top of my head--are actually just... traits that come from his history of trauma and abuse.

As I said in that old post:

making [zuko’s confrontation of ozai] about zuko being gay and rejecting ozai’s homophobia, rather than zuko learning fundamental truths about the world and about his home and about how there was something deeply wrong with his nation that needed to be fixed in order for the world to heal (and, no, ‘homophobia’ is not the answer to ‘what is wrong with the fire nation’, i’m still fucking pissed at bryke about that), misses the entire point of his character arc. this is the culmination of zuko realizing that he should never have had to earn his father’s love, because that should have been unconditional from the start. this is zuko realizing that he was not at fault for his father’s abuse--that speaking out of turn in a war meeting in no way justified fighting a duel with a child.

is that first realization (that a parent’s love should be unconditional, and if it isn’t, then that is the parent’s fault and not the child’s) something that queer kids in homophobic households/families can relate to? of course it is. but it’s also something that every other abused kid, straight kids and even queer kids who were abused for other reasons before they even knew they were anything other than cishet, can relate to as well. in that respect, it is not a uniquely queer experience, nor is it a uniquely queer story, and zuko not being attracted to girls (which is what a lot of it seems to boil down to, at the end of the day--cutting down zuko’s potential ships so that only zukka and a few far more niche ships are left standing) is not necessary to his character arc. nor does it particularly make sense.

And, regarding his date with Jin:

(and before anyone brings up his date with jin--a) he enjoyed it when she kissed him, and b) he was a traumatized, abused child going out on a first date. of course he was fucking awkward. have you ever met a teenage boy????)

Zuko is socially awkward and maladjusted because he was abused by his father as a child and has trouble relating to people as a result. He was heavily traumatized and brutally physically injured as a teenager, and it took him years to begin to truly recover from the scars that left on his psyche (and it's highly likely, despite the strides he made in canon, that he has a long way to go, post series; it's such a pity that we never got any continuation comics >.>). He was not abused for being gay or queer--he was abused because his father believed he was weak, and part of Zuko's journey was realizing that his father's perception of strength was flawed at its core. That his entire nation had rotted from the inside out, and the regime needed to be changed in order for the world--including his people--to begin to heal.

That could be commingled with a coming out narrative, which is completely fine for headcanons (although I personally prefer not to, because, again, we have more than enough queer trauma already), but it simply doesn't exist in canon. Zuko was not abused or traumatized for being queer, and his confrontation with Ozai was not about him coming out or realizing any fundamental truth about himself--it was about realizing something fundamental about his father and his nation, and making the choice to leave them behind so that he could help the Avatar grow stronger and force things to change when he got back.

TL;DR: at the end of the day, none of the traits, scenes, or behavior Zuko exhibits which shippers tend to use to claim he was gay-coded are actually evidence of coding--they aren't uniquely queer experiences, as they stem from abuse that was not related in any way to his sexuality, and they are experiences that any kid who suffered similar abuse or trauma could recognize and resonate with. (Including straight kids, and queer kids who were abused for any reason other than their identity.) And, finally, Zuko can be queer without erasing or invalidating his canon attraction to girls, and it's endlessly frustrating that the 'Zuko is gay-coded' crowd refuses to acknowledge that.

#atla #zuko #on queer coding #atla fandom salt #salt for ts #asked #mudbend

135 notes · View notes