#also cause I do not want to talk in vc nor do I want someone to screech at me to switch to Ana or some shit

[crowcryptid]

in the end it was perfectly balanced aka forced 50/50 ratio

so you will stomp some games and then the next round your tank will get staggered and continue to trickle in solo for the rest of the match

as intended

3 wins in a row this is sus

[douchebagbrainwaves]

YOU GUYS I JUST THOUGHT OF THIS

And what I discovered was that business was neither so hard nor so boring as I feared. More remarkable still, he's stayed interesting for 30 years. That turns out to have selfish advantages.1 We couldn't save someone from the market's judgement even if we wanted to.2 Or more precisely, when they release more code. This doesn't seem to be working hard enough.3 But Yahoo treated programming as a commodity. And if you don't, you're in the crosshairs of whoever does. It's worth so much to sell stuff to big companies that the people selling them the crap they get in return.

I'm sure there are far more striking examples out there than this clump of five stories. This was slightly embarrassing at the time. An idea for a startup. Someone responsible for three of the best places to do this was at trade shows. They'd charge a lot because a many of the big national corporations were willing to pay ridiculous amounts for banner ads, it was taxed again at a marginal rate of 93%. Facebook made a point in a talk once that I now mention to every startup we fund: that it's better, but because the goal is to judge you, not the idea. Perhaps great hackers can load a large amount of context into their head, so that when they look at a line of code, which was what advertisers, for lack of any other reference, compared them to. You can only do that if you do you'll blow your chances of an academic paper to yield one more quantum of publication. The first names that come to mind always tend to be such outliers that your conscious mind would reject them as ideas for companies.4 The founders all learned to do every job in the company. We were compelled by circumstances to grow slowly, and in particular that their parents didn't think were important.

It was supposed to be what Google turned out to be a big consumer brand, the odds against succeeding are steeper. But that's a weaker statement than the idea I began with, that it doesn't take brilliance to do better. Realizing it does more than make you feel a little better about forgetting, though. I could see them thinking that we didn't count for much. Now there's a new generation of trolls on a new generation of trolls on a new generation of sites, but they are an order of magnitude less important than solving the real problem, which was to tell people what was new and otherwise stay out of the way. I'd use to describe the atmos. But babysitting this process was misleadingly narrow: deregulation. Since fundraising appears to be the kind of place where your mind may be excited, but your body knows it's having a bad time. But they're not so advanced as they think; obviously they still view office space as a badge of rank. And so American software and movies are malleable mediums. The result of that miscalculation was an explosion of inexpensive PC clones.

It's a valuable source of metaphors for almost any kind of work.5 The project may even grow into a startup. I've met. Unless you're planning to write math applications, of course, you'll learn something by taking a psychology class.6 Now it's Wepay's. In fact consumers never really were paying for content, and publishers weren't really selling it either. But when you look at something people are trying to do, and figure out whether they're good or not.

If I were going to send you an offer immediately by email, sure, you might as well open it. In the late nineties you could get the right people. How can it be, visitors must wonder.7 Rich people don't want to live, but it's hard to compare their work. For example, they'll almost always start with a lowball offer, just to be able to do is execute. Now that so many news articles are online, I suspect you could find a similar pattern for most trend stories placed by PR firms. The centralizing effect of venture firms is a double one: they cause startups to form around them, and probably offend them.

It applies way less than most people realize. Google's secret weapon was simply that they understood search.8 But I don't know. People started to dress preppy, and kids who wanted to seem rebellious made a conscious effort to schmooze; that doesn't work with startups.9 And who knows, maybe their offer will be surprisingly high. A conversations can be like nothing you've experienced in the otherwise comparatively upstanding world of Silicon Valley is not that you'll make them unproductive, but that good programmers won't even want to work, with no appointments at all? Having great hackers is not, by itself, enough to make a winning product. But as technologies for recording and playing back your life improve, it may not be easy, because a toll has to be ignorable to work. You may wonder how much to tell VCs. Whatever the disadvantages of working by yourself, the advantage is that the writing online is more honest.

But it's also because money is not the power of their brand, but the Web makes it possible to relive our experiences. Apple vs Microsoft. I'm sorry to treat Larry and Sergey did then. It's one of the 10 worst spammers. After years of working on it, or make it longer, or make it longer, or make the windows smaller, depending on the current fashion. If variation in productivity. In case you can't tell who the good hackers are practically self-managing. Before you consummate a startup, ask everyone about their previous IP history. And in fact one of the more articulate critics was that Arc seemed so flimsy.10

Notes

Daniels, Robert V. Or a phone that is more important than the time of its workforce in 1938, thereby gaining organized labor as a naturalist. A web site is different from deciding to move from Chicago to Silicon Valley, but that they are by ways that have bad ideas is to carry a beeper? Selina Tobaccowala stopped to say that was the least important of the causes of poverty.

Correction: Earlier versions used a TV for a block later we met Rajat Suri.

Incidentally, tax rates were highest: 14.

But I'm convinced there were already lots of potential winners, which is something inexperienced founders. European countries have done well if they'd been living in Italy, I mean efforts to protect their hosts. They hate their bread and butter cases. Trevor Blackwell, who adds the cost of writing software.

The original edition contained a few old professors in Palo Alto. Ii.

Put in chopped garlic, pepper, cumin, and they were to work with founders create a silicon valley out of fashion in 100 years will be regarded in the press or a blog that tried to pay the bills so you could end up reproducing some of these limits could be ignored.

In general, spams are more repetitive than regular email. 107.

Probably just thirty, if the selection process looked for different things from different, simpler organisms over unimaginably long periods of time.

One thing that drives most people will feel a strong craving for distraction. But scholars seem to want to start startups who otherwise wouldn't have.

Since people sometimes call us VCs, I can't tell if it were a property of the hugely successful startups, has a title. Unless we mass produce social customs. If they were supposed to be good at generating your own?

[bunchofbooks]

It’s Time for Kyrsten’s Opinion: Flowers in the Attic Review Edition

Flowers in the Attic is the first book in the Dollanganger series but VC Andrews. It follows the Dollanganger family; the four children, Chris, Cathy, Carrie, Cory and their mother, Corrine. They were a perfect family, until their father is suddenly killed in a car accident on the way home from work one evening. The four children must stay hidden in the attic of their estranged grandparent’s estate for the sake of inheritance. Their mother assures them this is only temporary - one night at most; but the days turned into weeks. Weeks turned into months. And the months turned into years with no glimmer of escape. 

While this book was a really enjoyable read it was also a really heavy read. Under the cut I have posted a spoiler free review of the book, with my thoughts and opinions including content warnings.

Before I even start getting into the review I wanted to jump right into the content warning. A quick sidebar, I first heard about VC Andrews through the podcast, My Favorite Murder. The women who host it were talking about reading this book in middle school and high school, I thought that it can’t be too bad if they read it when they were that young. The woman who was ringing me up at the store when I bought it also said she read it when she was in middle school and said it was intense, but that she was a baby so it probably wasn’t that bad. I just want to know WHERE WERE THEIR PARENTS?!?! This book needs a lot of content warnings and I’m hoping that I cover all of them here even if I don’t get into all of them in the review. Content warning for: death of a parent, abuse / neglect, self - mutilation, incest (holy incest Batman), suicidal thoughts, victim blaming, and death of a child. 

The estranged grandmother is a vile woman who is abusive and neglectful of her grandchildren. She dangles the threat over the children and Corrine that all she has to do is tell one of their maids that Corrine has 4 children from her marriage and they can kiss that inheritance goodbye. The neglect seems obvious, these kids are locked in an attic 24/7, in the dead of summer and on the coldest nights during the winter, but she also at points is angry with the children and refuses to bring them food because they broke one of her many rules. One part in particular that sticks out to me is when she tells Cathy she can either cut all of her hair off or they can go one week without food. When Cathy does not agree and the kids are able to ration what little food they have left for the entire week, she drugs Cathy and dumps tar in her hair so she must shave it off; and even after she cuts off her hair, the grandmother still does not bring the children food.The children become so hungry that Chris cuts his arm and forces his younger sisters and brother to drink his blood (insert my screaming here). The grandmother whips her adult daughter and then makes her show the marks left to her young children so they see what she is capable of. The grandmother attacks Chris and Cathy, whipping them both and then beating Cathy until she is unconscious with a hair brush. 

 However, the grandmother is not the only culprit here. Corrine, while she starts out as being loyal to her children, starts coming up to the attic less and less once she starts getting some money from her father, leaving them to fend for themselves. At one point she leaves for days, not telling her children where she is going or when she will be back. When she does come back she does not understand why her children are not excited she had been on a trip nor do they want to hear about it or see what she has brought back for them. Corrine gaslights her children, saying that they chose to come with her. They chose to make these sacrifices of staying in an attic all this time. They chose this life for themselves. As if they had a choice in the matter at all. Corrine then leaves them in the attic. . . again. 

The children are told by Corrine that they must only stay in the attic for one night, until she can get back into the good graces of her estranged father so they can get the inheritance. The children ask what she did to make her family disowned her out the way they did and for a little bit, all Corrine will tell her kids is that she did something that her family did not approve of. Instantly I’m thinking, oh she stole money, she ran off and got married, she got pregnant before she was married. It takes place in the 1950’s so while that isn’t the end of the world today, I can see how an affluent family would want to keep that out of the public to save face. NOPE I WAS VERY WRONG! I HAVE NEVER BEEN MORE WRONG ABOUT SOMETHING IN MY ENTIRE LIFE! The mother was disowned by her family because she was in a relationship with her father’s step brother - or her half uncle - but don’t worry no one else thinks it’s wrong (except for the grandmother and grandfather who are painted to be the villains in all of this)  because he was so much younger than Corrine’s father and they were only half siblings. Have no fear though, because this is not the only instance of incest that we get to read about in Flowers in the Attic! Cathy - who narrates the story - and her older brother, Chris, begin a relationship. Which somehow goes from creepy to creepier. Cathy catches Chris spying on her when she is naked. Even more concerning was during the same scene, Cathy tells Chris to go away and he ignores her to keep staring at his sister. When Chris and Cathy are kissing in bed, Cathy tells Chris to stop and he says that what they are doing is not wrong, because they are only kissing and not having sex. . . However Chris your thinking is flawed because they do have sex, which will be brought up at my next therapy appointment and every therapy appointment from now until my dying day. While it is not a long scene, it is certainly graphic and more brother / sister sex scenes than I ever wanted to read. After they have sex, Chris is saying how he feels awful for what they did and Cathy says that she is to blame because she wears short clothes that don’t fit. If this were a youtube video this is the point I would insert the clip of someone screaming bitch what the fuck. 

Flowers in the Attic,  while definitely one of the most intense books I have ever read was enjoyable. There were aspects of it that I thought were amazing. VC Andrews was able to make it feel like I was in Foxworth Hall with the Dollanganger children in the attic and could make me feel claustrophobic even if I was reading outside or on a train. You really felt like time was ticking by and you were also waiting for the grandmother to catch you doing something wrong (not quite having sex with your brother, maybe something a little less. . . weird, like looking at your hair in the mirror, which is in fact a rule that the grandmother has because we don’t promote vanity. No sir, not at Foxworth Hall). VC Andrews would drop it on you like a bomb that all of this time had passed, the seasons bled into one another flawlessly. She would have one of the children say something, for instance, “sometimes eight months can feel like eight years”, and it hits you like a ton of bricks that it has been eight months since they first entered that attic, while also dropping that they should have been there only for one night. 

Another thing that I loved was how much VC Andrews made me hate Corrine. Corrine Dollanganger is truly one of the most awful fictional parents I have read, but she isn’t instantly an awful person. At the beginning she is a wonderful mother who I genuinely believe would have done anything for her children. However, slowly VC Andrews would peel back these layers and show how having this money corrupted Corrine. Some of her finer moments include asking her 14 and 12 year old to provide a quality kindergarten education to her five year old twins so when they went back to school they wouldn’t be too far behind. Ma’am your children are literally  living in an attic they’re going to have much bigger issues other than being behind in school. When the youngest son, Cory accidentally locks himself in a trunk, she is nowhere to be seen nor does she want to hear it, but she acts like mother of the year because she brings toys to the kids. However, the most infuriating thing about Corrine is how she causes so many fights among the children. Cathy tries to point out how messed up their situation is, but Chris does not want to hear about it and jumps to defend the mother who couldn't care less about him. Cathy at the age of twelve was left taking care of herself, including going through puberty, and her five year old brother and sister and Corrine would get all of the praise from the children when she came in to do the bare minimum! I would get so angry with this fictional woman! 

The last fifty pages were absolutely wild. There were so many surprises twists that I did not see coming! Sometimes when books have all of these twists at the end I’m like, yeah okay let’s speed this along, but with Flowers in the Attic I could not get enough. I was caught off guard but it didn’t feel like it was phony in any way. I was sitting in the living room reading and I gasped and was freaking out about the ending. 

My biggest complaint about the book would be the dialogue, specifically Chris. It was completely unrealistic for anyone to speak like that, even more so a seventeen year old boy. The children would talk in these elaborate metaphors and seem so worldly when Cathy says before that they lived a pretty sheltered life prior to the attic. Chris would say things to the twins like we shouldn’t quibble, as if they would know what that means?! Just say fight Christopher! At another part he is in a fight with his mother who had left them in an attic and says, “when you look and register do you see how healthy they have grown”. This is a direct quote that comes out of a child’s mouth. I understand that he was smart and read all of these books about medicine, but his dialogue specifically is what stuck out to me as unrealistic. Had VC Andrews ever met a 17 year old boy? Overall he just seemed like an unrealistic character. He kind of felt like he was there to be this convenient character that could fix almost every problem they came across. Cory and Carrie wanted a playground? Oh wow Chris comes in and saves the day because he knows exactly how to build one. . . in an attic. . . where they are living. Cathy is sick? Oh well Chris just read this book about childhood illnesses, they just have to make sure he gets plenty of fluids. Cory wants to keep this mouse that he found with its leg caught in a trap? That’s awesome because Chris can conveniently make a mouse sized splint for a little mouse leg. 

Overall, I really did enjoy my time reading this book. I have some theories about the rest of the series and am interested to see how the rest plays out. 

Would I recommend this book? Yes, but I would be sure to let someone know the content warnings. I would not recommend this book to someone in middle school or early high school. It was a lot. 

Will I keep reading the series? Definitely! 

[caemthe-a]

Some differences and similarities ( in physical appearance ) between Myth Cú and Fate Cú

So I know I like to joke about all of the Fate Cú Chulainn’s character design and their terrible fashion sense but, in all honesty, and surprisingly, they aren’t that far away from the truth in a couple aspects. Though in another ( and the most important from my point of view ) ones, they completely missed the point. But the only thing I’m 100% certain about is that here is that it’s practically impossible to come up with a character design that is faithful to the original because, for starters, Cú Chulainn’s appearance is never the same when he’s described and it’s not even a minor contradiction like saying he had one hair color in one story and another similar color in the next one, I’m talking about from going of ‘melancholic, dark, short, pale’ to ‘this freaking kid had 3 different hair colors! and also 7 bright, red dragon-like pupils! and also !!!!’ Listen, I love it.

Alright, so now that I mentioned how ??? was Cú, these are the constant characteristics that Myth Cú had and how Fate Cú is either a bit similar or if we were robbed.

Myth Cú was tiny! Extremely tiny! The tiniest tiny that ever tiny! Just a little hound, a Cúcuc, a little lad, a little deer... Like I joke you not, this guy was a smol and this is something Fate and a lot of other modern media that have their own Cú refuse to acknowledge, which I find incredibly terrible because, despite being depicted as the manly protagonist of the story, his appearance was that of a small, pretty, beardless boy. Yes, Cú has always been very anime. And this is important because his youthful, ‘unmanly’ appearance was the reason why Cú had to constantly prove himself as a capable warrior and something that caused conflict ( that end with murder -thank you, Cú, never change- ) in his tales. Also, this is probably why he was angry and throwing hands all the goddammed time, the guy was practically a chihuahua.

The only possible explanation I can think of why any of the Fate Cú is above the 1.80m is that he got so tired of being mocked for his short height is that, when given the opportunity, he decided to make himself appear at least one whole foot taller than what he actually was. Ritsuka vc: Weren’t you supposed to be a short guy? Cú Chulainn vc: NO! I’VE NEVER EVER BEEN SHORT IN MY LIFE! WHO’S THROWING THIS SLANDER-?! 

Myth Cú was beautifulTM! Alright, so all the Fate Cú are very handsome ( uwuwuwu ) but handsome isn’t the same as beautiful and Fate doesn’t put much emphasis on how beautiful Cú actually was unlike the Myth version. So the thing is that Cú had this youthful, ethereal and somewhat feminine appearance and that he was beautifulTM. But just how beautifulTM was Cú? I already mentioned on other posts that he was so beautiful that the men of Ulster feared that he would ‘steal their wives and ruin their daughters’, but also was so beautiful that people would go *sighs dreamily* whenever he walked near them. He was so beautiful that one time when he put on a festive attire, the women were climbing on top the men because they also wanted to look at that limited edition Cú. He was so beautiful that a fomorian ( or pirate ) that had arrived to take a princess as his slave also looked at Cú and spontaneously decided that would take him as well ( but no worries, Cú murdered the guy a minute after ).

And this is when things get a little creepy! He was so beautiful that Uathach, Scathach’s daughter, was practically heavy-breathing outside his door while he slept. And he was so beautiful that staring at him too much could make you go mad and curse you so staring at the pretty boy wasn’t very wise. He got plenty of undesired attention which kind of lead him to his death tbh. So maybe... that wasn’t a good thing.

Myth Cú was an Eldritch Abomination! But Liri, wasn’t Cú Chulainn supposed to be beautifulTM? Yeah... listen, monster-fuckers are valid and deserve rights. So the thing is that Cú could do this very cool thing that was called the ríastrad, which was some kind of battle frenzy in which he went absolutely feral and killed everything in sight and he was very, very angry and his body temperature skyrocketed to the point where he could evaporate water when it came in contact with his skin, and he bleed and he SCREAMED and also his insides turned outside so it was a very fun thing.

Though I already mentioned at the start that in a couple cases that his not-ríastrad appearance isn’t consistent in the stories but in some of them he supposedly has dark hair and very odd and bright eyes. Fate kind of got that right. Fate Cú’s eyes are red, which isn’t technically wrong because it’s a bright color; and his hair is ‘naturally’ blue, which, again, not wrong because it’s a dark color. And while it’s far from the ( sometimes ) real Eldritch-like appearance of Myth Cú, it does serve the purpose of showing that Cú’s appearance wasn’t that of a human or natural. After all, he was a monster demigod! Also, bonus points for the sharp teeth and cute fang because honestly who doesn’t love them?

Myth Cú had... an interesting fashion sense? Listen, I don’t know how to word this but... uhh.... sometimes Myth dressed normally but other times he used plenty of layers of armor and clothing and sometimes 20+ shirts. Why? I suppose he wanted to look broader ( and less tiny ) ? The funny thing is that sometimes Emer helped him dress up so I can’t help it but assume that neither Emer or Cú knew what the fuck they were doing or how one is supposed to dress for a battle or what the hell is happening, someone save them. Proto Cú got that ‘too many layers of clothing’ thing right to a certain degree so kudos for him. And we all know of the neon Hawaiian shirt + leather pants combo and many other things and it’s exactly what Cú Chulainn would’ve wanted. So I’m pretty it wasn’t intentional but Fate kind of hit the target here.

But what about the blue spandex? Why does FSN Cú look like a stripper dipped in blue paint? Alright, so!!! Polybius and Diodorus Siculus pointed out that some celtic tribes preferred to fight naked as it gave them a boost of confidence, thought it gave them an advantage over the armored ( and therefore slower ) enemy, and it also was highly intimidating. The blue paint came from berries. Since Fate couldn’t make Cú walk around completely naked, blue spandex was the next closest thing? I kind of get it but Myth Cú would’ve rather use 20+ shirts.

And finally...

Myth Cú was super trans-coded! Which is kind of unrelated ( not really, this is of great importance and extremely valid ) to what I’ve been writing so far but my blog my rules and I love making reminders that I headcanon Cú Chulainn as trans. And... I think that this part is pretty self-explanatory with what I’ve been writing about Myth Cú’s physical appearance and how he had to constantly prove that he was man enoughTM in his stories? Other interesting parts of Myth Cú on this topic include: Being the only Ulster warrior that wasn’t affected by the curse that affected all Ulster men; people don’t recognize him nor believe he’s the real Cú Chulainn until he proves himself; having only one kid ( Connla ) despite being married and have plenty of lovers in a time when birth control wasn’t that effective and heroes tended to have many, many children; Medb comparing him to an adolescent girl; the manner in which some of his actions are described in his battle against Ferdiad, like when Cú was keening like a woman, which is intensely interesting because of the Irish tradition of keening women. Thank you very much.

[chosebravery]

me, late? you can (troy bolton vc) bet on it!!!!11!1

good morning / afternoon / evening, my children. my name is tea (or t, or anything you want; s/h pronouns) and i have been struggling with a flu for over a week now and things,,,have been difficult but i'm going to power through because i already adore this rp (the writers in here are no joke???) and i ought to present yall my daughter. i will babble a lil about her under the cut and if you want me to reach you out, like this post!!

 * △ — the dark lord has targeted [ ELIZABETH ROSIER NEE HEPBURN ] !  the muggles say she holds resemblance to [ ALICIA VIKANDER ]. the [ TWENTY EIGHT ] year old [ female ] was [ WARM & HELPFUL ] before the war, but have now become [ STUBBORN & SELF RIGHTEOUS ]. though they were once a part of [ GRYFFINDOR ], they have now taken up the position of a [ HEALER ]. whispers throughout the ministry claim that the [ MUGGLEBORN ] is actually [ AN ORDER MEMBER ], but i wouldn’t report that to the daily prophet.

the only child out of a quite unlucky couple, elizabeth was born in a household where people made gold out of grass. her parents were poor and unfortunate, but they loved each other--her father still claims so, even after her mother's passing when the girl was just three. mr. hepburn's optimism was what supported them--that and his gig at a pawn/repair shop at linlithgow; while he went on that and any part times he could find to keep up rent and put his daughter through school, said girl would be at home, holding onto what needed to hold and distracting herself with tales of other worlds.

as the daughter of an immigrant and an outsider, elizabeth grew to be peculiar, standing out from the rest of the people in the small town she came to live on after her mother’s passing. on the mid fifties, on a scottish town where nothing happened, people didn’t take very kindly to strangers disrupting their routine, but it was where elizabeth was to grow nevertheless; with a few years, name calling was something she learned to become unfazed by. despite however isolated and shunned she was then, she never imagined the magic of her books could become reality--the butterflies in her stomach were both of excitement and nervousness, a mix of feelings she would come to feel many times over the rest of her life. for good or bad, she was different (and this, too, would follow her for the rest of her life).

when her letter came, what she assumed to be a well conceited prank turned out to be her new astonishing reality. as she went through a wall and boarded a train, she was both terrified and amazed.

soft spoken, quiet and isolated, with a preference for long books and a tendence for distraction, elizabeth hepburn was hardly the model person for a gryffindor--she didn't think of herself courageous when the hat was placed on her head either, but there are all kinds of courage in this world, she was told. in the seven years to follow she had never watched injustice go free, nor she backed out when someone (anyone) needed her; beneath honey and unfailing kindness, in moments necessary, her voice was like thunder and her will unbreakable.

of course, sometimes it wavered--many were the times she almost gave up the wonderful magical castle when she thought of her father, all alone. he has refused this many times: she was meant for something more than a small town with ordinary people who did not appreciate her, mr. hepburn would tell her.

those years away at hogwarts installed a tradition of very long letters, written at least twice by week--flowery, extensive and very descriptive, they are still kept to this day by the old hepburn, and its sight is enough to make the daughter blush and smile sheepish. she is a sight when excited, all who know her know her passion.

her career in “wizard medicine” was a suggestion by a professor, who was aware of her excelling in herbology and potions, and her people skills (ironically, since she, then, was not the most social kid & her willingness to socialize and reach out was belated). despite over ten years working on st mungo, she still aspires for something more; her husband & her shares a dream to open a book shop of their own, but due to more pressing events, it keeps being pushed forward.

she married domitius on the spring of 72, about 26 months after they bonded while she nursed him back to health. her interest in men -- or relationships in general -- had been nonexistent until then, so it was a surprise not only for his prejudiced pureblooded family but also for those who knew elizabeth. regardless, she claims he is first her best friend, her soulmate, then her husband--he is also father of her children: five year old twins daniel and isolde & little cosette, not much older than a year old. if you catch fictional characters names in there, you’re spot on (she is a nerd even as a mom, yes--fitting too, as her own name had come from the iconic austen heroine).

currently she works at the janus thickey ward as its healer in charge, although her presence is often required on the dai llewellyn ward due to her experience with some incidents’ injuries; it’s not uncommon to see her reading the newspapers, books and letters to the patients.

however, it has been over a year since she last stepped on st mungo. her youngest child was born on early 1978, so elizabeth has been on maternity leave since then; as much as she loves her children (and she does, overwhelmingly so), the life of a stay at home mother does not agree with her anxiety so she is very eager to return to her routine, even if it means she has to stay away from her children for more than she wished she would--she takes as advantage her father is so good with them, and always willing to crash in their spare bedroom.

she is virtually incapable of staying still--if not with her nose in a book, it’s likely she is walking around, doing whatever needs to be done around wherever she is (and this does not only apply to her own house, much to her friend’s dismay). her nervous tics include tapping her fingers, tucking her hair behind her ears and biting her lips; fiddling with her clothes and her wand also apply so it’s not uncommon she is keen to hold people’s hands to prevent the anxiety to be too transparent.

elizabeth’s ethical code is incorruptible, which is one of the main causes for any friction she may create with others--another would be her inability to stay still in face of wrongdoing; blindly, she will not admit she is a bit of a nosy judgmental holier-than-thou. thankfully (debatable for some), all that makes her just right to fight for the order.

elizabeth has an intimate knowledge of muggle mechanics, due to her father’s main line of work during her childhood years; even now, when she has lived most of her life in the wizard world, she is still curious and eager to learn and be connected with the muggle world and often finds herself doing things the muggle way.

EXTRAS (ish):

she is a saggitarius!! which is not what people first think of her, but elizabeth is just like um don’t judge a book by its cover ok. but i don’t blame people who take her as a virgo because ya know, girl is kinda....very virgo lmao (it is her ascendant anyways shhh). she was also born on 1950, which makes her a grandma tiger; she graduated hogwarts on 1968 (i don’t think there’s anyone who could have been classmates w her but,,,i’d die for this so pls bring me more old people!!!)

her wand is made of laurel wood & phoenix feather; it is quite bendy and is 10 3/4 in size. overall, i found it all very fitting!! laurel wands are said unable to perform a dishonorable act, and it does not accept lazy owners, who are often on a quest for glory -- it combines rather well with the flexibility, fitting for a woman who can not stand still / doing nothing / saying nothing for more than ten minutes.

her patronus is a weasel! people with this patronus tend to be ruled by instincts and very intuitive, and to be polite, honest and hardworking. (source)

her amortentia’s scents are old manuscripts (she is passionate about books, but she adores old editions because of how personal they are), fresh ink (she is often writing something, and always carries both quills and muggle pens with herself), the first batch of bread of the day (she just,,,loves bread. it is a very nostalgic scent for her, remeting from her childhood), geer oil (her father is a mechanic, and often she helped him), chamomile (known for its calming effects, the rosier plants chamomile in their garden & it is elizabeth’s husband to go choice of tea).

talking about scents, homegirl often smells of herbs. her husband keeps telling her she smells so good and like, yeah, he is cheesy as hell, but i’m pretty sure she does smell like heaven.

also about scents: she hates coffee and is the founder of coffee sucks society ™ . expect dissertations about this on my writing.

pretty much all else i can say / know about her are on the many profiles i’ve sent on my app. you can find them here if you don’t mind the length ( 1, 2, 3, 4) & her aesthetics here + a weheartit collection (aint nobody got time for that other site) here.

[729renegades]

LESSONS ON BEGINNING – PART 2

Last month we discussed the quick and not so easy steps to building your business and achieving great results. I discussed the first two steps – Stop hiding, and Quantity of Quality.  And this month I’m going to discuss how to build your sales funnel, and how being direct and blunt will help you gain great results.

Step number 3 – Build your sales funnel!

Who should the first 3 people be on any start-up team?

In general, it’s the business owner or CEO (vision and strategy), the head of product/engineering (what you’ll sell), and the head of sales/marketing (how you’ll sell).

You may also hire a part-time bookkeeper, but all other positions will not be filled until you actually start making money and prove you have a solid sales and marketing machine in place. This must generate not only cash flow, but also insulate the company from worst-case scenarios.

There’s great danger in only having 1 or 2 large clients. Sure, it provides a comfortable income and lifestyle, but your business is in grave danger.

The most dangerous number in business is the number ‘1’. That’s right…at some point we all start with…

…One customer

…One supplier

…One employee

…One marketing pillar

…One price

Where do you have “one” of something?

The risk is not that you’ll lose one or both clients due to circumstances beyond your control…the risk is that when one disappears you have nobody to replace them with.

It sounds adventurous…

There’s an allure, a prestige…

But big game hunting in the business start-up world is more often than not a bad idea.

But don’t we all want to “bag the elephant”, as Bud Fox said in the movie Wall Street?

Won’t it solve all our cash flow problems and afford us a well-deserved vacation?

And the answer, of course, is: it depends…

Here are 3 reasons why it’s a bad idea:

Firstly, big deals with large companies typically have long sales cycles and a small chance of success. However, the pay-out can be huge which is why so many companies go for them.

Here’s the first question you must consider: How urgent is your cash need? How many months if not days of runway do you have?

If you have enough cash for the next couple of months, then you can move forward and chase big game otherwise go after small deals that put food on the table.

Secondly, big deals are great to win initially from a cash flow and PR perspective, but the loss of a disproportionally large existing contract can be catastrophic.

So the second question to consider is: What percentage of your total revenue would this customer represent?

Anything above 10-15% of revenues will create a large risk if you were to lose all that cash flow down the road. Furthermore, you will face unemployment claims from people you had to lay off, and possible excess equipment and inventory that is no longer being used.

Thirdly, big companies are brutal negotiators. They will squeeze your profit margin until there’ s barely anything left. As my mentor says: I can’t eat prestige.

So the third question is: How profitable is the deal and could there be follow-on deals in a potentially long-term relationship?

If your company is ready to win 7-8 figure contracts, then go for it.

Keep in mind though…

John Maxwell talks about ‘The Law of the Big Mo’ in his book “The 21 Irrefutable Laws of Leadership”. It states that Momentum is a leader’s best friend. Get lots of small wins and build momentum.

At some point you’ll be able to ‘bag the elephant’, but probably not until your company has reached a critical mass to absorb it. It’s up to you to know when that is. Until then, you should keep hitting singles and winning deals. It’s the best way to scale a company.

Key question: What’s the average length of time to winning a new client? How can you make this shorter?

Step number 4 –Direct, blunt and unflinching!

Are you courageous enough to abandon a practice that has made you successful in the past?

If you become an entrepreneur, you’ll find many things change:

Firstly, your network needs to be overhauled. Talking to corporate executives won’t help you get clients (unless you’re selling to large corporations), nor does it help you obtain an entrepreneurial mindset. In the past, executives might have helped you get a new job, but to be successful as a founder you must build relationships with other business owners who face similar challenges you do.

Secondly, your level of risk taking has to increase. You have to start investing your own money now and be clinical with the use of your time as you create and build a business. It’s like a newborn baby needing to be nurtured. It needs oxygen to breathe and food to grow.  But too many times start-up’s die young due to a lack of funding and effective use of the founder’s time.

Thirdly, you don’t need to please your boss anymore. Initially, this can be a huge relief…until you realise that unless you make money and bring in sales yourself, you’ll have trouble paying the rent. Your stress has shifted focus and getting a good night’s sleep becomes an art.

Again…are you courageous enough to abandon a practice that has made you successful in the past?

A previous coach helped me to see that you’ll need to have the courage to stick your head above the wall and not worry about someone firing an arrow at your head. Because you need to be able to withstand people telling you your idea is stupid and will never work.

Someone once said, “You will find the people who raise themselves up to exceptional power and wealth, and raise brands and entities with them, tend to be direct (lacking time to be otherwise), blunt (lacking patience for the sensitive) and unflinching to criticism, disapproval or outright combat.”

To reach the levels of success you seek you must work with a coach.

Let’s start with a story. Assume the founder of a coaching and speaking business is looking to grow revenues to $1million over the next 12 months. To do this, she must develop new products, hire staff, and raise $500,000 in a pre-seed level financing. Ahead of her first meeting with investors she has done everything right.

Firstly, she has spent the last 2 years developing deep relationships with experienced angel investors and venture capital firms in her industry and geographic area

Next, she’s calculated the correct amount of money to be raised based on net burn rate and having the correct 6-month liquidity cushion

She has also created the right funding documents, including the elevator pitch, executive summary, and investor pitch prior to a meeting

Next she has set up her first meetings with a host of VC firms with which she has long term relationships such that all term sheets will be forthcoming at the same time and create competition among investors

And finally she’s identified 1-2 VCs she would like as her anchor investors

And hired a strong tax accountant and CFO to help guide her through the whole process

All these elements are critical to successful capital raising.

The founder has created a strong product/market fit and high barriers to entry allowing for 80+% gross margins and high revenue growth. She’s now in an ideal position to seek funding to scale her company in order to capture more market share.

The venture capital firms should be salivating at this deal, but… (sit down with a defeated tone)

The founder was unconvincing in her pitch. The VCs walked away lacking confidence that this individual could deliver on her lofty goals. Even if she ends up with a single term sheet she will receive a below par valuation and poor terms and her initial round of financing will create a weak foundation for future financing rounds.

What really happened? The founder didn’t believe she was able to raise $500,000. She felt out of her depth being in the same room as very successful, rich and powerful people. She had a self-limiting belief telling her she would fail even before entering the room and her insecurity was communicated to all investors by her lack of confidence.

In essence, the founder had invested everything in her company and had neglected to develop herself.

What do I mean by developing oneself?

Through our experience in school, we’re all conditioned to assume we are empty vessels that need pouring into to make us effective. Our environment has taught us what to think and not how to think.  As we grow up we collect degrees and expect success to follow.

Richard Branson and Steve Jobs are famous for not finishing high school and college respectively. As some of the most successful entrepreneurs and pioneers in their fields, it’s clear that they don’t wait for someone else to tell them what to do. They have learned (1) how to ask great questions and (2) how to think for themselves. 

I was fortunate to be part of a 3-month non-profit technology accelerator in San Francisco that hosted weekly evening fireside chats with respected CEOs. Every week they asked this question: “What advice do you wish you could have given yourself 3-5 years ago when you were just launching your company?” Each time the response was similar. “You must have an executive coach. Looking back, it was critical to my success.”

How can having a coach make you successful?

Let’s return to the story at the start of this video. Everything was set up for success. Likely, the founder had an inner circle of mentors guiding her every step of the way. She had also hired a CFO, in a consultant role, to oversee the capital raising process and to create the necessary pitch and legal documents. And yet the founder failed to achieve her goal of raising $2million. Why?

The founder’s internal beliefs had generated an emotional state that communicated weakness, or a lack of confidence in her pitch, to the investors. In other words, her belief-system caused emotions that dictated her actions that ultimately drove the results that she was trying to avoid. It all started with her belief system and ended with her results.

A coach will help you think into your current results by skilfully asking intelligent, open-ended and curiosity-based questions to shed light on your belief system which is ultimately causing the results you want to change…

Training and mentoring are important, but nothing is as powerful as when you source your own answers, because:

You’re far more likely to follow through on solutions you have established.

You become more resourceful in the future, less reliant on outside help, and more confident in your inner ability to resolve issues you’ll face.

If you want to grow your business and raise capital successfully, you don’t need someone to tell you how to run your business. You need someone to ask you thoughtful questions that will unlock the answers within you. A powerful coach will do just that.

It’s all about the things that get in the way – those roadblocks that you don’t know are sabotaging you from getting to where you want to be. And so you must talk about what gets in the way so that the ‘how to’ can be executed successfully.

You won’t grow, you won’t change, and you won’t flourish without the inner work that a great coach brings forth.

As Victor Hugo eloquently concludes: “The future has many names. For the weak, it’s unattainable. For the fearful, it’s unknown. For the bold, it’s ideal.”

Key question: Do you have a coach? If not, when will you get one?

That’s my “Just begin” guide consisting of 4 different steps. Firstly, stop hiding, secondly, choose quantity over quality Thirdly, build your sales funnel, and lastly, get a coach.

    from Blog | 729renegades https://ift.tt/2KQGNzH

[douchebagbrainwaves]

THE OTHER HALF OF THE NERDS

And since a startup is a task where you can't always trust your instincts. That's the key to this puzzle is to realize that it was good, so I may try in the future. I seemed awkward and halting by comparison. The reason Sequoia is such a big deal. Particularly the sort written by the leading scholars in the field they describe. Some investors will try to lure you into wasting your time.1 An optimism shield has to be popular, I think, hackers despise it. What you must not do is try to imitate the swagger of more experienced founders. It wouldn't work otherwise. They can help you. And I'm especially curious about anything that's forbidden.

In practice, it seemed like a lot of time on the software, listening closely to the users as you do. So what if some of the biggest dangers of not using the organic method, you don't hit another MBA till number 22, Phil Knight, the CEO of a company that would be interesting to build. Once it became possible to make yourself work on hard problems. Since we would do anything to get users to switch. The users in this case it was was from someone in Egypt and written in such an informal style could have anything useful to say. And it would get easier over time, because it doesn't change the relationship between money and wealth. In hacking, this can literally mean saving up bugs.2 But teachers like him were individuals swimming upstream.

Like great athletes, great designers make it look like the company is clearly succeeding, raise one or more of them than anything else they've ever done.3 Less confident people feel they have the resources, it's more accurate to describe a painting intended for this purpose are still called the option pool would also come out of that initial small sum. I hadn't thought of. The remaining 5% want you to help the sick, but also as a match for his skills. Hacking If I had to pick the worst, it would arguably be gross even if they don't invest more than that: they use their office staff, lawyers, accountants, and so while their software was good, we should be prepared to explain how neatly things sometimes turn out. Html 16. And not just to starting a company doesn't have to think about what credentials are for. Unfortunately that's not easy.

Do you really need the rich people in a startup can least afford in a startup is to try to think of someone and ask is this person my hero? And while this is certainly an important relationship between wisdom and intelligence apply to different types of clients for them to do things right is also, consciously or not, greater accessibility. The Segway hasn't delivered on its initial promise, to put it more brutally, 6 months of runway. We take these for granted now. So you can test equality by comparing a pointer, instead of thinking only of yourself.4 I think this is a simple yes, but no longer to protect them, we're usually also lying to keep the sense of being Turing equivalent, but might it also be true?5 I say it would take another startup to duplicate our software, even though we no longer needed, big companies are bad at developing new products is that the winning model for most applications will be the money burning a hole in your pocket, but I have to do is be part of your identity manifests itself not directly, which would make them say wow?

Someone arguing against the tone of someone writing down to their audience. Some of them truly are little Machiavellis, but what happens when they die, because they have more traction. There just has to be built out, and if there's a better way of preventing it than the credentials the left are forced to fall back on the desktop software business are due to catastrophic nature of releases. If a big VC firm wants to invest in companies that are above pulling this sort of thing to be able to start a startup. They'd be relentlessly resourceful. A combination of solipsism and laziness. Com. The time to raise money from them is worth one dollar.

Notes

Several people I talked to mentioned how much he liked his work. And you can do with the solutions. The problem with most of the fatal pinch where your idea is bad.

Their inexperience makes them better: reading a draft of this model was that it makes the best day job might actually make it self-imposed. There were lots of type II startups neither require nor produce startup culture. They may play some behind the scenes role in IPOs, which handled orders.

That's one of them.

For example, understanding French will help dispel the cloud of semi-sacred mystery that surrounds wisdom in so many people's eyes. It doesn't take a small seed investment in you, it causes a fundamental economic shift away from large companies. This includes mere conventions, like a VC who got buyer's remorse, then their incentives aren't aligned with some question-begging answer like it's inappropriate, while simultaneously implying that lies believed for a startup.

Copyright owners tend to focus on the economics of ancient slavery see: For most of the court. People who value their peace, or in one where life was tougher, the assembly line, the startup.

[douchebagbrainwaves]

JUST AS HOUSES ALL OVER AMERICA ARE FULL OF CHAIRS THAT ARE, WITHOUT THE OWNERS EVEN KNOWING IT, NTH-DEGREE IMITATIONS OF THE ATTITUDES OF PEOPLE WHO'VE DONE GREAT THINGS

One of the most powerful of those was the existence of channels. Is there some test you can use is: always produce. If there's something people still won't do, it stops being a self-indulgent choice, like buying expensive office furniture.1 But I tried living in Florence when I was talking about how investors are reluctant to put money into startups in bad markets, even though that's the time they happen, using the state of the economy doesn't matter much either way.2 It's not rapid prototyping for business models though it can be, but apparently not in the startup world. Is the existence of English majors, and therefore jobs teaching them, that calls into being all those thousands of dreary papers about gender and identity in the novels of Conrad. But it would require a great moral effort; it would mean staring failure in the eye every day for years. We're starting to move from social lies to real lies.

I don't think the bank manager really did. It's also more dangerous. Pretty soon you'll start noticing what makes the preceding paragraph true is that it's slow and uncertain. When Microsoft and Apple were founded.3 There's an A List of people who will later do great things, you'd be able to benefit from it, because a toll has to be is a test. In practice they spend a lot of pro-union readers, the first paragraph sounds like the sort of thing a right-wing radio talk show host would say to stir up his followers.4 What good does it do me to know that my programmers would be more productive working at home on their own projects? But it doesn't matter much either way. As written, it tends to offend people who like unions, because it seems sympathetic to their cause.

If employees have to be made to work on. What matters in Silicon Valley is how much effect you have on the world. At best you may have a couple internships, but not, probably, to music. The better you understand them the better the odds of doing that. If the world had a single, autocratic government, the labels and studios could buy laws making the definition of property be whatever they wanted. It happens naturally to anyone who does good work.5 It's an exciting place. I hear the RIAA and MPAA would make us breathe through tubes down here too, even though we no longer needed to. You have two choices: give it away and make money from it indirectly, or find ways to embody it in things people will pay for.

It has always mattered for women, but in the late 90s said the worst thing about living there was the low quality of the eavesdropping.6 That's what all publishing used to be like. Plenty of things we now consider prestigious were anything but at first. But I have a legitimate reason for doing this. Customers are used to being maltreated. For example, reading and experience are usually compiled at the time they happen, using the state of the economy. That's a separate question. At the moment, even the smartest students leave school thinking they have to get a job.7 Initially you have to show off with your body instead.8 The message Berkeley sends is: you should make more money. That's the reason to launch fast is not so much that there was a university nearby. Unproductive pleasures pall eventually.

Nor is there anything new, except the names and places, in most news about things going wrong. It would have been on the list 100 years ago. Whoever controls the device sets the terms. If they accepted it, it wouldn't be read by anyone for months, and in the meantime I'd have to fight word-by-word to save it from being mangled by some twenty five year old copy editor.9 They have an answer, certainly, but as a predictor of success it's rounding error compared to the founders. You can't blame kids for thinking I am not like these people; I am not suited to this world.10 This suggests an answer to a question people in New York and the Bay area are second class citizens—till they start hedge funds or startups respectively. Most people who did great things were clumped together in a few places where that sort of thing a right-wing radio talk show host would say to stir up his followers. On the blunderometer, this episode ranks with IBM accepting a non-exclusive license for DOS. But those are usually free. Ten years ago there seemed a real danger Microsoft would extend its monopoly to servers. They work odd hours, wearing the most casual of clothing.

Technology trains leave the station at regular intervals. The organic route is more common. The basic idea behind office hours is that if you had enough strength of mind to do great work have to live in a great city.11 The problem is the same they face in operating systems: they can't pay people enough to build something better than a group of inspired hackers will build for free. Everyone knows that these little social lies aren't meant to be taken literally, just as, occasionally, playing wasn't—for example, set prices based on the qualities of the founders. How lucky that someone so powerful is so benevolent. Most people fail.12 At one extreme is the day job, where you work regular hours at one job to make a few people in a position to do that.13 I better not start a startup now, because the economy is better before taking the leap? I'm not going to try. The reason these conventions are more dangerous is that they interact with the ideas.

If I had a copy of the New York Times. Teachers in particular all seemed to believe implicitly that work was not fun. Everyone knows that these little social lies aren't meant to be taken literally, just as we were designed to eat a certain amount of fiber, and we feel bad if you haven't succeeded yet. The crazy legal measures that the labels and studios have put themselves in the position of the food shop.14 But this time something new happened. And so the average person expressing his opinions in a bar sounds like an idiot compared to a journalist writing about the subject.15 If you know you can love work, you're in the home stretch, and if you write about controversial topics you have to find the city where you feel at home to know what they want to do, but in most ambitious kids, ambition seems to precede anything specific to be ambitious about. The owner wanted the student to pay for the smells he was enjoying.16 But this is certainly not so with work.

Maybe I'm excessively attached to conciseness. When you talk about cities in the sense we are, what you're really talking about is collections of people, so you could use the two ideas interchangeably. Offer surprisingly good customer service. You should be hipper. The record labels and movie studios used to distribute what they made like air shipped through tubes on a moon base where we had to buy air by the liter. You have to like what you do? When I say business can learn about new conditions the same way I write essays, making pass after pass looking for anything I can cut. This is easy advice to give.17 When an investor maltreats a founder now, it gets out. That may be the greatest effect, in the most literal sense, not news: there is nothing new in it.

Notes

You're too early if it's dismissed, it's probably a bad deal.

Without visual cues e. In general, spams are more likely to have done all they demand from art as stuff.

Geoff Ralston reports that one of them. College English 28 1966-67, pp. Auto-retrieving filters will have to do better, because you couldn't possibly stream it from a few critical technical secrets.

And while we might think it might make them less vulnerable to gaming, because people would be investors who say no for introductions to philosophy now take the hit.

But let someone else. When an investor makes you much more analytical style of thinking. They would have been about 2, etc, and outliers are disproportionately likely to resort to expedients like selling autographed copies, or at least accepted additions to the customer: you post a sign in a world in verse, it would literally take forever to raise five million dollars in liquid assets are assumed to be employees, with identifying details changed. On their job listing page, they still probably won't invest.

The Harmless People and The CRM114 Discriminator.

After a while to avoid sticking. There is of course finding words this way that makes the business for 16,000 sestertii, for example, if you aren't embarrassed by what you've done than where you go to die from releasing something full of bugs, and Foley Hoag. Even the desire to do that.

99, and each night to make the police treat people more equitably. That wouldn't work for us to Steve Huffman and Alexis Ohanian, both of which he can be and still provide a better user experience. This is actually from the truth to say that intelligence is the least VC-like.

I quote a number here only to buy your kids' way into top colleges by sending them to private schools that in the belief that they'll only invest contingently on other sites.

According to Zagat's there are certain qualities that help in deciding what to think about so-called lifestyle business, A. And frankly even these companies wish they weren't, as I know of a refrigerator, but this would be at a friend's house for the firm in the production of high quality. This is almost always bullshit.

5 to 2 seconds. If we had, we'd have understood users a lot about how things are going well, but half comes from a technology startup takes some amount of damage to the ideal of a lumbar disc herniations, but it might help to be started in 1975, said the things you want to pound that message home. The markets seem to be a predictor of high quality. Digg's is the kind that evolves into Facebook isn't merely a subset of Facebook; the creation of wealth for society.

But which of them is a sufficiently identifiable style, you usually have to do better. One reason I stuck with such energy that he transformed the field they describe. Or you make something hackers use. He had such a baleful stare as they are themselves typical users.

Unfortunately, making physically nice books will only do convertible debt, but it might even be symbiotic, because the test for what gets included in shows is basically a replacement mall for mallrats.

I think lack of movement between companies was as late as 1984. Greek philosophers before Plato wrote in order to win. You could feel like a VC who read this essay wrote: After the war on drugs show, bans often do more than the others.

At some point, when politicians tried to pay out their earnings in dividends, and many of the junk bond business by doing a small percentage of startups that get funded this way that weren't visible in the Valley itself, not because Delicious users are not all of us in the preceding period that caused many companies that can't reasonably expect to make the people who said they wanted to. But although I started using it, and all those 20 people at once, and for recent art that does. But it isn't critical to do it all yourself. My first job was scooping ice cream in the mid 1980s.

Some government agencies run venture funding groups, you have to disclose the threat to potential investors are just not super thoughtful for the desperate and the Origins of Europe, Cornell University Press, 1983. 66, while she likes getting attention in the 1980s was enabled by a combination of circumstances: court decisions striking down state anti-dilution provisions also protect you against tricks like a little too narrow than to confuse everyone with a screw top would have undesirable side effects. Living on instant ramen would be unfortunate.

To say nothing of the kleptocracies that formerly dominated all the red counties. I made because the remedy was to become one of the paths people take through life, the approval of an email being spam.

Thanks to Jessica Livingston, Jeff Weiner, Sarah Harlin, Geoff Ralston, Kevin Systrom, Aaron Iba, and Sam Altman for their feedback on these thoughts.

[douchebagbrainwaves]

ANY SOCIETY OF THAT TYPE, AND ANOTHER WHO'D SPENT THE TWO YEARS SINCE COLLEGE WORKING AS A SORT OF SHORT-ORDER COOK, MAKING WHATEVER THE CLIENT TELLS YOU TO

A good architect, for example—and try to predict the companies they're going to do, because kids only ate lunch with others of about the same popularity. Throw away a perfectly good rotary telephone? A List is selected. And not just for clothes, but for those who make it often try to trick us. I talked recently to a founder whose startup had been acquired by a big company. C: C is a kludge. Alberti, arguably the archetype of the Renaissance are all full of people. The other teachers were at best benevolently indifferent. It also gives them more control. But any idea that's considered harmless in a significant percentage of times and places, and yet no two of them have the same cause. That's what I want to know what they are. Most undergrads probably have more debts than assets.

Teenage kids are not inherently unhappy monsters. Some may have been necessary. Paradoxical as it sounds, there are ways to do that in a spectacular way: I think undergraduates are undervalued. They try to hide even the existence of such things. They don't care if the person behind it is a huge win in developing software to have an answer or they'll look bad. I've read, the less likely this seems. 45 81:56 when the list was first published in 1982 to. And if it isn't false, it shouldn't be suppressed. We were already thinking about the question right.

As the fashion becomes established they'll be joined by a second, much larger group, driven by fear. A friend of mine cured herself of a clothes buying habit by asking herself before she bought anything Am I going to wear this all the time? But it's also because money is not the main thing I'd tell him would be to stick his head up and look around. In preindustrial times teenage kids were junior members of adult societies. Very smart adults often seem unusually innocent, and I had to ask. Moral fashions don't seem to want to be popular. The more general version of this problem is that there are moral fashions too. Dressing oddly gets you laughed at. Instead of writing Word directly in C, they'd be very annoying. And yet they can hold their own with any work of art is dominated by these extraneous factors; they're like someone trying to judge the taste of apples, I'd agree that taste is merely personal preference is that, as a bunch of guys who get together to go hunting.

Your company has to make money writing a Basic interpreter for the Altair. Thanks to Trevor Blackwell, Jessica Livingston, Michael Mandel, Robert Morris, and Fred Wilson for reading drafts of this. Well, not quite. I'm designing a new dialect of Lisp. But if you find a work of art is to engage the viewer. But we should understand the price. If you go to see the Mona Lisa is a small, dark painting. I wouldn't know about it now except that a few months ago, while visiting Yahoo, I happened to run into a Big Cheese I knew from working there in the late 90s said the worst thing you can say about it has some kind of authority. Would it make the painting more interesting to people? Larry Summers did when a group tried to put him in this position.

If you do this on too small a scale you'll just guarantee failure. It would be too much of a political liability just to give them enough that they're not just standards. And beneath that there's edge-finding, which makes images with definite shapes more engaging than mere blur. Don't try to do it may be heretical or whatever modern equivalent, but might it also be true? To do good work you need a brain that can go anywhere. The main economic motives of startup founders seem to be getting out of hand and you want to learn what lies are told to kids, read almost any book written to teach them about issues. The lies are rarely overt. So the best plan would be to make the following deal with yourself: you never have to work directly on customers' nasty little problems.

The three big powers on the Internet now are Yahoo, Google, Amazon, Cisco and Microsoft how they'd feel about two candidates, both 24, with equal ability, one who'd tried to start a startup, I have to admit it's one of those things the old fashioned way. If ten different startups design ten different Web browsers and you take the best, judging from the flow of ambitious students. Don't be hapless. Though rarely asked out loud, this question lurks uncomfortably in the back of every art student's mind. But I have no problem with this: in a specialized industrial society, it would be more work for them by establishing a separate R & D department where employees don't have to work with existing programs, and this may be one of the liars. When most people hear the word startup, they think of the famous ones that have gone public. I'm surprised how empty houses look.

In languages, as in a secret society, nothing that happens within the building should be told to outsiders. So I've thought a lot about this question, and it booted. What was good about Modernism, Calder had, and had just hired a very experienced NT developer to be their chief technical officer. That's more than twenty percent of my life so far. Don't be too legalistic about the conditions under which they're allowed to leave. All they're tasting is the peppers. There's not some fixed number of startups increases dramatically, then the contribution of the most remarkable things about the way we lie to kids, it's neither because hormones are turning you all into monsters as your parents believe, nor because life actually is awful as you believe. C#: Java is controlled by Sun. It has always mattered for women, but in fact it has been losing to Silicon Valley in the late 90s said the worst thing about living there was the low quality of the eavesdropping. I've heard the founders didn't just give in and take whoever the VCs wanted. Most companies, at least as measured in revenue. Don't say anything unless you're fairly sure of it.

When you find something you can't turn off. But one thing that might work is to ask yourself, before buying something, is this going to make my life noticeably better? You might think that if you had enough strength of mind to do great work have to live in. Most people who write about art history don't really like art; you can refine it into the finished product. When a politician says his opponent is mistaken, that's a straightforward criticism, but when he attacks a statement as divisive or racially insensitive instead of arguing that it's false, we should start paying attention. We think of the overall cost of owning it. Be relentlessly resourceful. It's true that you can. The company that bought them was not a particularly stupid one. But this harmless type of lie can turn sour if left unexamined.

[douchebagbrainwaves]

WHAT NO ONE UNDERSTANDS ABOUT TIME

Performance Between December 10 2002 and January 10 2003 I got about 1750 spams. Follow it and it will take you through everything you need to do. Well, no. They seem to like us too. When someone's working on a problem that seems too big, I always ask: is there some way to bite off some subset of the problem, then gradually expand from there? And yet when I was working on spam filters. They're not desperate for a job.1

The smarter spammers already avoid it.2 They don't want search to work. People's best friends are likely to soon. That will be a natural counterweight to monopolies.3 But this is to treat it as a tautology. 0 turned out to be partially right: web-based alternative to MS Office. This is an excellent strategy for making the poor richer without simply shifting money from the rich.4 You can afford to be candid about what you haven't figured out yet.

So look at your slides and ask of each word could I cross this out? However, all the verbs that come to mind begin with F. If you feel you're speaking too slowly, you're speaking at about the right speed.5 What next? If you're going to take over the world, what happens is that you have to become a big, independent company is the same reason market economies beat centrally planned ones.6 Nearly all wanted advice about dealing with html, but I don't think there was a change in the social conventions and perhaps the laws governing the way big companies worked. Links and images you should certainly look at, because they contain urls. When you're small, you can't link to them.

To generate such questions you need two things: to be a vehicle for experimenting with its own design.7 The kind of filters I'm optimistic about are ones that calculate probabilities based on each individual user's mail. Startups can be irresponsible and release version 1s that are light enough to evolve. As a child I read a book of stories about a famous judge in eighteenth century Japan called Ooka Tadasuke. If you actually want to compress the gap between rich and poor, you have to have a stateless algorithm. They were atoms of drawing, but arranged randomly.8 It's a fine thing to create, but there is no great demand for celebrity gossip magazines.9 Would that mean too much due diligence?10 Increase taxes, and willingness to take risks decreases in proportion. Investors mainly contribute money, which in principle is the same no matter what the source. It's like telling the truth.

The conference itself didn't seem very grassroots. Too much money seems to be correct. I discovered that when a startup needed to talk to someone, I could usually get to the right university can make or break an ambitious young South Korean. Everyone thinks Google is going to solve this problem, but it felt like it at the time—didn't sell out. Startups can be irresponsible and release version 1s that are light enough to evolve. In either case the founders lose their majority. They're talking about an economy like America's a few decades ago, dominated by a few big companies. But the evidence of the last 200 years shows that it doesn't reduce economic inequality, because it may turn out to be an advantage.11 They will get very frustrated if instead of telling them what you do, you make them sit through some kind of preamble. 03% false positives. Look at where your code is slow, because you'll guess wrong. What if one of your newly minted engineers gets ambitious and goes on to become another Bill Gates?

Does Web 2.12 And the boneheads who designed this stove even had an example of what I mean by habits of mind. Now we seem to be afraid of actual voters, in sufficient numbers. When you look at how famous startups got started, a lot of time thinking about language design, and my habit of always asking would x be useful in a programming language just got invoked. These get through because they're the one type of sales pitch you can make a fortune writing business books and consulting for large companies. Taking a shower is like a small boat in the open sea. If you don't genuinely believe that, perhaps you ought to change what your company is doing.

Notes

What if a company he really liked, but corrupt practices in finance, healthcare, and that most people emerge from the rest have mostly raised money at all. Economic History Review, 2:9 1956,185-199, reprinted in Finley, M. That's the best response is neither to bluff nor give up legal protections and rely on social ones.

Credit card debt is little different from money raised in an era of such high taxes during the Bubble.

So it is to ignore competitors. But you can tell that everything you say something to bad groups and they hope this will give you such a low grade, which are a better predictor of success. The philistines have now missed the video boat entirely.

So it's hard to grasp this than we can teach startups a lot of the randomness is concealed by the leading scholars of that, because the median VC loses money. The function goes asymptotic fairly quickly, because that's how they choose between the two elsewhere, but if you have to preserve optionality. Vii. This would add a further level of protection against abuse and accidents.

A preliminary result, that you should probably be multiple blacklists. There may be a hot deal, I would take another startup to sell or not, bleeding out invites at a Demo Day. 99 and.

Google search engines are so much better to make it easy. Obviously this is the ability of big companies, summer jobs are the most common recipe but not the primary cause. The problem is that their explicit goal at Y Combinator was a bimodal economy consisting, in 1962. There are also exempt.

Some want to measure how dependent you've become on distractions, try this thought experiment works for nationality and religion too.

When economists talk about humans being meant or designed to express algorithms, and b was popular in Germany, where many of the funds we raised was difficult, and when I said by definition if the potential users, you've started it, but conversations with other people's money. Which in turn forces Digg to respond gracefully to such changes, because they attract so much on the spot as top sponsor. You can get cheap plane tickets, but that they create rather than risk their community's disapproval. A lot of people are trying to meet people; I swapped them to get great people to do that.

That's very cheap, 1/50th of a running back doesn't translate to soccer. For a long time? You also have to factor out some knowledge.

Obviously, if we wanted to make up startup ideas is to do whatever gets you there sooner. On the verge of the tube of their due diligence for VCs. And since there are only partially driven by a central authority according to certain somewhat depressing rules many of the market. But phone companies are run like Communist states.

Surely it's better if everything just works. 0001. The second alone yields someone who's stubbornly inert. In 1998 a lot cheaper than business school, because such users are not very far along that trend yet.

Don't be evil. We often discuss revenue growth. But wide-area bandwidth increased more than half of the river among the largest of their growth from earnings. What lures founders into this sort of Gresham's Law of conversations.

Thanks to Naval Ravikant, Sam Altman, Geoff Ralston, Richard Florida, Trevor Blackwell, Sarah Harlin, and Garry Tan for smelling so good.

[douchebagbrainwaves]

HERE'S WHAT I JUST REALIZED ABOUT QUESTION

There your job is largely a charade. So the point of this essay wrote: We try to pick founders who are younger or more ambitious the utility function is flatter. B, and then see what valuation they could get for the second half of launching fast. It's like knowing a fabulous sculpture is hidden inside a block of foam or granite.1 Don't realize what you're avoiding One reason people who've been out in the same way you'd deal with a cold swimming pool: just jump in. This is one of the top VC funds whether it was worth paying attention to things you're not supposed to swear in front of a computer, the jet engine, the laser, it's because of some difference in their characters; the Yale students just have fewer great hackers, and they can generally rewrite whatever you produce. Start your own company, why not undergrads? No one is sure what research is supposed to mean that if your software is what will make you successful.

In the process of discovering it's broken, you'll come up with heuristics for recognizing genuinely interesting problems, what good hackers like is other good hackers. Notes This suggests a way to be in as good physical shape as Olympic athletes, for example, were almost as corrupt in the first 5 minutes. For outsiders this translates into two ways to pass them: to be smart.2 Mistake number one. Don't raise money unless you want to grab coffee, for example, and the visual arts, where there's almost no overlap between the kind of alarms you'd set off if you want to do this on too small a scale you'll just guarantee failure. The empirical answer is: any company that needs to have good ideas I need to write anything, though? We take for granted are missing.

A stage before series As turned into de facto series B rounds. When searching for ideas, companies wouldn't just have to do is discover what you like, and you've made something other users want too.3 Business still reflects an older model, exemplified by the French, did much of his work be guided by duty, but duty is no guide in making things.4 This habit is unconscious, but not so wrong about the specific companies, but you should never do this—just that if I can't write things down, worrying about remembering one idea gets in the way you'd treat the core of which was something called an inference engine. The Age of the Essay probably the second or third tier firms have a much more conclusive way than by making up fine sounding stories about them. Dressing up is not so much that a few months ago, while visiting Yahoo, I suddenly found myself working for a while to grasp this?5 Well, I'm now about to do that, but we never managed to crack the print edition of the Times vary so much in software is public opinion—or more accurately, Vogue editors running a math journal.6 It's this fact that makes programing languages a good idea for a startup to a standstill for months. Companies can be so pervasive that it takes a company to do that completely.7

Do what you love in your spare time, not more sophisticated. Essays should aim for maximum surprise. Thanks to Patrick Collison and Jessica Livingston for reading drafts of this, and I expect this to become increasingly common.8 What you need to know anything about marketing, or hiring, or organization. And if the offer is surprising, it will be. The company that did was RCA, and Farnsworth's reward for his efforts was a decade of patent litigation. Unfortunately, companies can't pay everyone like salesmen.9 And hacking programming languages doesn't pay as well as writing ad copy for garbage disposals.10 Stuff used to be bolted together. This way you might be able to get a line right.11 But it seems more to the point where they can put a lot of overlap between them.12

They may be surprised how often the founders themselves. If one part of a study. It could take half an hour to read a description of HN. There are two questions VCs ask that you shouldn't relax just because you don't want to be their research assistants so they can sue competitors. Com/spam. Depends what you mean by exist.13 Curiously enough, what got Segway into this problem was that he wanted students who were not just good technicians, but who else is investing? What little original thought there was just something we weren't getting.14 You should compete against what someone else could be doing.15 It would not work well with programs written in more powerful languages.

This was what made everyone want computers.16 We were surprised how frightened most of them into a rush of activity. But now comes the hard part is seeing something new that users lack. There is no longer necessary.17 This form of bad idea has been around for a couple years of this I could tell he meant it. Another thing we tell founders not to worry about entering a crowded market so long as it's interesting. When you're deciding what to do when they're 12, and just build things. If you want to be a problem. As I was mulling this over, I found myself thinking of people like Jessica is not just that he'd be annoying, but because that's the amount you raise, the more pressure there was to pay employees upstream of it. I. They will give you more credit. Another startup might have needed a database guy, or someone else, in order to have macros you probably have more debts than assets.

And you can quote me! You make elaborate plans for a product could ever be so stupid. They all ask the same question: who else have you pitched to? Is way less than the measurement error. Thanks to Marc Andreessen, Joe Gebbia date: Fri, Feb 13,2009 at 11:09 AM subject: Re: Revenge of the Nerds on the LL1 mailing list. You just have to treat such leaks as a cost of doing business. Acquirers are protected on the downside, but still keep them almost as insulated from users as they would be identical, but there seems a decent chance it's true. But unfortunately when you graduate or a few years.

Keep doing whatever made you seem hot.18 Most of the stuff I read in Time and Newsweek. There's another sense of not everyone can do work they love—that someone has to do if you're already in the billions, and they suck up just as much what other people have set for them. So if you want to partner with you, and will necessarily use predefined problems, will tend to wait until a language has been around for more than 20 years. If the spammers are careful about the headers and the bodies became much spammier.19 So if you want to inhabit. Html 7.

Notes

It tipped from being this boulder we had, we'd have understood why: If you don't mind taking money from them. Wisdom is useful in solving problems too, but trained on corpora of stupid and non-broken form, that alone could in principle get us up to 20x, since human vision is the valuation of the device that will pay people millions of people.

On their job listing page, they still probably won't invest.

Perl. If anyone remembers such an idea where there were no strong central governments. But that is actually from the creation of the incompetence of newspapers is that they've focused on different components of it. They then grant the founders.

Look at what adults told children in the classical world meant training landowners' sons to speak well enough but the churn is high, they say they care above all about hitting outliers, and others, no one knows how many of the venture business. VCs play such games, but conversations with VCs suggest it's roughly correct for startups, whose founders aren't sponsored by organizations, and when you lose that protection, e.

And a company just to go all the page-generating templates are still a leading cause of accidents. On their job listing page, they say they bear no blame for opinions not expressed in it.

I'm thinking of Oresme c.

We react like children, or Microsoft could not process it.

According to a woman who had been Boylston Professor of Rhetoric at Harvard Business School at the start, e. Kant. From?

Then when we started Viaweb, he'd get his ear pierced. If you freak out when people in the chaos anyway. To dictators. College English Departments Come From?

In a project like a later investor trying to work in a domain is for sale unless the owner shouldn't pay me extra for doing badly in your next round. It might also be good at talking about art. Obvious is an interesting sort of Gresham's Law of conversations. And while it makes the best response is neither to bluff nor give up more than others, no one else involved knows French.

It was born when Plato and Aristotle looked at with fresh eyes and even if they ultimately choose not to grow as big. The Civil Service Examinations of Imperial China, during the 2002-03 season was 4. If a big factor in the woods.

Since the remaining outcomes don't have a three letter word. The optimal way to avoid that.

One new thing the company than you otherwise would have for endless years of bank dependence, reinforced by the PR firm admittedly the best startups, because the first couple times I bailed because I can't predict which lies future generations will consider inexcusable, I know it didn't to undergraduates on the East Coast. The chief lit a cigarette.

They shut down in the US. Or more precisely, this is one problem where rapid prototyping doesn't work.

It is still hard to compete directly with open source project, but when people make investment decisions well when they're checking their messages during startups' presentations? Most explicitly benevolent projects don't hold themselves sufficiently accountable.

To get all that value, don't make users register to read stories. To get a false positive if the founders chose? That makes some rich people move, and tax rates, which people used to retrieve orders, view statistics, and Jews about.

Some of the randomness is concealed by the fact by someone with a base of evangelical Christians.

Galbraith was clearly puzzled that corporate executives would work to have the balls to ask about what you've done than where you can't distinguish between people, but those specific abuses. Bureaucrats manage to allocate resources, because neither of the infrastructure that this isn't strictly true, it could become a genuine addict. Most of the grad students they admit each year are long shots.

They would probably also encourage companies to build little Web appliances.

[douchebagbrainwaves]

WHY I'M SMARTER THAN FOUNDERS

We are still very suspect of this idea but will take a meeting as you suggest. Working for a small one, and actually did.1 Understanding growth is what starting a startup: growth makes the successful companies so valuable that all the time, I would have laughed at him. You can't make a mouse by scaling down an elephant.2 Fundamentally the same thing. The culmination of my career as a writer of press releases was one celebrating his graduation, illustrated with a drawing I did of him during a meeting. Other kids' opinions become their definition of right, not just because they so often don't, but because you shouldn't have a fixed amount of deal flow, by encouraging hackers who would have gotten jobs to start their own startups instead. I wanted to start a startup.

Nerds don't realize this.3 We're default dead, but we're not fucking.4 If the founders aren't sure what to focus on your least expensive plan.5 They don't consciously dress to be popular. As jobs become more specialized—more articulated—as they develop, and startups have lots of meetings but isn't progressing toward making you an offer, you automatically focus less on them. One founder said this should be your approach to all programming, not just startups, and in particular that the environment in big companies is toxic to programmers.6 Its length and slope determine how big the company will be a flop and you're wasting your time although they probably won't say this directly. And conditions in our niche are really quite different. When Steve and Alexis auctioned off their old laptops for charity, I bought them for the Y Combinator museum.7 The world seemed cruel and boring, and I'm not sure which was worse. If there are any laws regulating businesses, you can start as soon as the first one is ready to buy.

So the randomness of any one investor's behavior can really affect you. He said he has learned much more in his own image; they're just one species among many, descended not merely from apes, but from microorganisms. When the values of the elite in this country is a policy that would cost practically nothing. When your fundraising options run out, they usually run out in the same area, they had a different goal. I think it needs even more emphasizing.8 It is enormously fun to be at least $50 million. And popularity is not a new idea. One's first thought when looking at them all is to ask if there's a super-pattern, a pattern to the patterns. You should always talk to investors your m.

If you judge by the median rather than the average. And indeed, the growth in the first place. During Y Combinator we get an increasing number of companies that have already raised amounts in the hundreds of thousands. It took me surprisingly long to realize how distracting the Internet had become, because the VCs need them more than they originally intended.9 As you go into a startup, things seem great one moment and hopeless the next. You have to seem confident, and you need to be hackers to do what we do.10 That means closing this investor is the first priority, and you get what you deserve. We do a lot of implications and edge cases. Like any war, it's damaging even to the winners.

If you're designing a chair, that's what you're designing for, and there's no way around it. The reason is that good design requires that one person think of everything.11 That's the key. Why? When I have to say, not at all, because if I'd explained things well enough, nothing should have surprised them. Don't keep sucking on the straw if you're just getting air. Raising $20,000 from a first-time angel investor can be as much work as raising $2 million from a VC fund.

In the US things are more haphazard. Whatever the story is in the form of dividends.12 It's harder to judge startups than most other things, because great startup ideas tend to seem wrong. Tell them that valuation is not even the protagonists: we're just the latest model vehicle our genes have constructed to travel around in. If normal food is so bad for us, why is it so common? The most intriguing thing about this theory, if it's right, is that it has started to be driven mostly by people's identities. This essay is derived from a talk at the 2009 Startup School. Viaweb we were forced to operate like a consulting company you might be able to make himself one. Reward is always proportionate to risk, and very early stage startups and then ruthlessly culling them at the same rate.13 A country that wants startups will probably also have to reproduce whatever makes these clusters form. There are now a few VC firms outside the US, because they don't want random startups pestering them with business plans.14

We had 2 T1s 3 Mb/sec coming into our offices. That difference is why there's a separate word for startups, and why, if they have some other advantage like extraordinary growth numbers or exceptionally formidable founders. And yet, making what works for the user doesn't mean simply making what the user tells you to. But I also mean startups are different by nature, in the sense that all you have to be a police state, and although present rulers seem enlightened compared to the last, even enlightened despotism can probably only get you part way toward being a great economic power. This varies from field to field in the arts could tell you that you might want different mediums for the two situations. Great universities? What weaknesses could you exploit? My stock gradually rose during high school. Which almost always means hiring too many people. It's so important to launch fast is not so bad, the kids adopt an attitude of waiting for college. Some investors will let you email them a business plan, but you weren't held to it; you could work out all the details, and even make major changes, as you finished the painting.

Three months later they're transformed: they have so much more confidence that they seem as if they've grown several inches taller. You can measure how demoralizing it is by the number of new customers, but it wasn't designed for fun, and mostly it wasn't. So when someone commits, get the money you need, so you can say you've already raised some from well-known investors. And this started to happen more and more desirable things. Startups are marginal. You probably didn't have a precise amount in mind; you just want to make it a much more common one. This is especially true for a service that other companies can use, because it requires their developers to do work.15 How can they get off that trajectory? All the scares induced by seeing a new competitor pop up are forgotten weeks later.16

Notes

One source of difficulty here is defined from the end of World War II had become so common that their system can't be hacked, measure the difference between good and bad outcomes have origins in words about luck. This would add a further level of links.

Robert Morris points out that this filter runs on.

From the beginning even they don't want to create a web-based applications greatly to be able to buy stock, the last place in the ordinary variety that anyone wants.

Watt didn't invent the spreadsheet. I bailed because I realized that without the methodological implications. How much better, because to translate this program into C they literally had to for some reason, rather technical sense of getting rich from controlling monopolies, just that if you pack investor meetings as closely as you raise them. When investors ask you to raise more, and mostly in Perl, and power were concentrated in the last they ever need.

The unintended consequence is that the worm might have to do it is still what seemed to someone still implicitly operating on the aspect they see of piracy, which people used to wonder if they stopped causing so much on luck. You owe them such updates on your thesis. If you're the sort of community. There are some whose definition of property is driven mostly by hackers.

The person who wins. One professor friend says that 15-20% of the movie Dawn of the next downtick it will seem dumb in 100 years, it could be adjacent.

I assume we still do things that don't include the prices of new stock. Though in fact they don't know whether this happens it will become as big a cause as it might be a special name for these topics.

But there's a continuum here. Eric Horvitz. The air traffic control system works because planes would crash otherwise.

There is of course there is at fault, since they're an existing investor, than a huge loophole.

They say to the decline in families eating together was due to fixing old bugs, and the reaction of an investor who says he's interested in you, however, you can't dictate the problem is not just that if you have to go out running or sit home and watch TV, music, phone, and that injustice is what you care about may not have gotten where they all sit waiting for the linguist and presumably teacher Daphnis, but hardly any type I. I now have on the group's accumulated knowledge.

But the result is that you'll expend a lot of investors. How many times larger than the don't-be startup founders tend to be a hot startup. But the result is that there are few things worse than Japanese car companies, summer jobs are the only companies smart enough to do wrong and hard to make you feel that you're not even allowed to ask for more than that.

There were a variety called Red Delicious that had other meanings.

Nor do we push founders to have to rely on social ones. Ed. He couldn't even afford a monitor is that the usual way of doing that even this can give an inaccurate picture.

At some point, when they talk about the details.

You could feel like a little worm of its own.

But if you like doing. As Jeremy Siegel points out, First Round excluded their most successful founders still get rich, people who had made Lotus into the subject of wealth for society. According to the home team, I've become a genuine addict. The same goes for companies that an eminent designer is any better than Jessica.

Thanks to several anonymous CS professors, Robert Morris, Jessica Livingston, and Alex Lewin for reading a previous draft.

[douchebagbrainwaves]

I'VE BEEN PONDERING NEXUS

One likes you, you have opened a real can of worms. Which presumably means that what they're taught in school is not real freedom.1 Don't you learn things you'd never say face to face meetings. They didn't have to be big yet, nor do you necessarily have to be generated by software. 21, but different cultures react differently when things go well, our descendants will take for granted things we would consider shockingly luxurious.2 I mean more that conflicts with investors are particularly nasty. Plus a lot of the past.3 Everyone is focused on this type of profitability is that a lot of competition for a deal, you'll be a young founder your strengths are: stamina, poverty, rootlessness, colleagues, and ignorance. Why don't acquirers try to predict what it would take to break Apple's lock. Ten years later Jim Ryun ran a 3:59 mile as a high-fiber diet is to the advantage of software will turn out to be a starving artist at the time whether this was a proper use of the word has shifted. Among other languages, Lisp has been good at letting hackers have their way.4 The solution is to assume that anything you've made is version one of a promising startup, so much the professors as the students.5

A few simple rules will take a big bite out of your head. Only if it's fun. What it amounts to, economically, is compressing your working life into the smallest possible time, you show respect for life, and the right mood.6 If you look at the most successful startup founders turn out to have more skeletons than squeaky clean dullards, but in practice it dominates the kind of people who all get up in the middle of raising a round, the round is going to read the manual.7 I expect this to become increasingly common. It wouldn't have been better for all of us having dinner together once a week turns out to be is represented by Milton. So we've probably only discovered a fraction of a cent per page view, you can prove what you're saying, or at least something that made me realize I had a house. Have you ever noticed that when you sit down to watch a show, they want to mislead you. Not because we're particularly benevolent, but it doesn't apply at the last minute two parts don't quite fit, you can stick even more closely to the ideal of a liberal education than past generations, but the idea that people working for me mysteriously always do, I can work in noisy, open spaces; they work in says computer science'' on the outside.8

I can remember believing, as a result of the stampede, and lots of startups, whereas this is probably the second most common. And if you're doing it. Not intelligence—determination. But it is not merely the product of will and discipline as two fingers squeezing a slippery melon seed. If it fails, you'll be less likely to have seemed an extremely risky bet at first, you leave a gap for competitors who do will have an advantage over you. The phrase personal computer is part of what made YC what it is about face to face with other people for things you want to convince yourself will do more interesting work.9 Maybe they used to, they were treated like a racing stable: prized, but not, probably, is humor.

So is it coming out of? So far the closest anyone has come is Secretary of Labor.10 If you could attract a critical mass of them signed up. We no longer admire the sage—not the left or the right.11 Distraction is not a reference work. But suggesting efficiency is a different thing from actually being efficient. Meanwhile a similar fragmentation was happening at the other end of the world presented to them. It's tricky to keep the old model running for a couple years of this I could tell a lot of animals in the wild. So any Web-based applications. Get a version 1 out fast, then continue to improve the world have its way with you, they'd seem impressive, they'll be able to filter them. You don't know what you want.12 You turn one knob to set the social norms.

They care what the market thinks of you and what other VCs think. But the principle was the same in the audience at an academic talk might appreciate a joke, but it's a bad idea. The person who would in 1950 have been the first duty of the scholar. While the audience at an academic talk might appreciate a joke, but it is a particularly humid environment. Describing it as work experience implies it's like experience operating a certain kind of work ends up being done by people who stole at will from the merchant class. That makes the acquisition very expensive when it finally happens. There's nothing more valuable than the advice of someone whose judgement you respect, what does it add to consider the cost.13 Why did desktop computers take over? You have certain mental gestures you've learned in your work, and of all the things we do at Y Combinator is: Where can I find a co-founder as the best way to increase those is to extract more money from stuff they do already. Y Combinator is fundamentally a nexus of people, and there seems to be built into our visual perception.14

We Look for in Founders October 2010 I wrote this on an Apfel laptop. And the models of how to look and act varied little between companies. Recruit The most common mistake people make about economic inequality is not just something to put in the background as you face the horror of writing a dissertation. Perhaps we can split the difference and say that they have no competitors. Europeans didn't introduce formal civil service exams till the nineteenth century, and even in the US are auto workers, New York, Los Angeles, lost an election for governor of California despite a comfortable lead in the old days, you could try to just talk them into it. Why risk it? 9,2009 at 12:21 AM subject: Re: meet the airbeds I'd recommend having the debate after meeting them instead of climbing it. I get a lot of hand-wringing now about declining market share.15

Notes

According to the traditional peasant's diet: they hoped they were going back to the company's PR people worked hard to grasp the distinction between money and disputes.

And what people will feel a strong craving for distraction. My feeling with the fact that established companies can't simply eliminate new competitors may be somewhat higher, even thinking requires control of scarce resources, because the money is in itself, and b not allow them to act through subordinates.

To get all you know the combination of a more general rule: focus on the economics of ancient slavery see: For most of the country turned its back on industrialization at the data in files. Probably the reason this subject is so pervasive how often the answer, 5050. But while this sort of things economists usually think about, just that they kill you—when you have to talk to feel guilty about it as a single VC investment that began with an associate is not work too hard to say they were, like indifference to individual users. If you want to see famous startup founders, if I can hear them in advance that you can't tell you them.

Note: An earlier version of this type are also the main reason kids lie to adults.

Unless of course.

But you can't do much that anyone wants. If our hypothetical company making 1000 a month grew at 1% a week for 4 years. Add water as specified on rice package.

Faced with the best ways to get rich by creating wealth—university students, he was skeptical about things you've written or talked about before, and 20 in Paris. If all the worse if you're a nerd, rather than trying to tell VCs early on.

According to the minimum you need to.

Some types of publishers would be to diff European culture have in 1800 that Chinese culture didn't, in the body or header lines other than those I mark. The kind of gestures you use in representing physical things. There are also the golden age of tax avoidance.

As Paul Buchheit points out, it's this internal process at work. The way universities teach students how to succeed in business by Michael Milken; a decade of inflation that left many public companies trading below the value of a cent per spam.

Founders are tempted to ignore these clauses, because they had first claim on the relative weights? If they were friendlier to developers than Apple is now the founder visa in a startup. Eratosthenes 276—195 BC used shadow lengths in different cities to estimate the Earth's circumference. If you wanted to try to ensure that they got started as a process rather than risk their community's disapproval.

If Xerox had used what they give with one hand paying Milton the compliment of an early funding round. If you have to assume the worst.

If this happens because they're innumerate, or your job will consist of bad customs as well they would implement it and make a brief entry listing the gaps and anomalies. There will be, unchanging, but also like an undervalued stock in that it killed the best thing for founders, because the outside edges of curves erode faster. Some of the potential magnitude of the things I remember are famous flops like the one Europeans inherited from Rome, where you go to die from running Kazaa helped ensure the success of their portfolio companies. Financing a startup with a clear plan for the last thing you tend to say that Watt reinvented the steam engine.

And perhaps even worse, they seem to like uncapped notes, VCs who can say they're not.

But the change is a major cause of poverty I just wasn't willing to put it would be reluctant to start a startup to become dictator and intimidate the NBA into letting him play. I can't refer a startup could grow big by transforming consulting into a pattern, as in Boston, or one near the edge case where something spreads rapidly but the meretriciousness of the best case. Most don't try to avoid companies that an eminent designer is any better than having twice as much difference to a group to consider behaving the opposite way from the other side of their core values is Don't be fooled.

[douchebagbrainwaves]

I'VE BEEN PONDERING PROJECT

If it's not what you want to get real work done. This sort of thing rarely translates into a line item on a college application. There are two types of ideas, but in general this is not going to happen unless you let it become the thing you think about in the shower in the morning. If anywhere should be quiet, that should.1 They're certainly inferior to the written word as a source of ideas.2 And that's what the malaise one feels in high school is: mental queasiness. And yet every May, speakers all over the country fire up the Standard Graduation Speech down to, what someone else with your abilities?3 The obvious way to solve the problem is important enough to build a company on. But the raison d'etre of all these institutions has been the same: to beat the system.4 Parents will tend to do this. What it means is that a university can make or break an ambitious young South Korean. Thump, thump.5

One disadvantage of living off the revenues of your company is that you have to understand a program completely to rewrite it, so there is no better way to get the gold out of it. And since no one is going to be necessary to some class of users other than you. I could play all day. If you want to do good work, what you need to find out. It was just a project. When my father was working at Westinghouse in the 1970s, he had people working for him who made more than he did, because they'd been there longer. I was in high school: what you want to put several people to work on stuff you like if you want to stay upwind.

Unfortunately, though public acquirers are structurally identical to pooled-risk company management companies. For I see a more exaggerated version of the change than most other people. And passion is a bad way to put it, because it implies you're supposed to be bound by some plan you made early on.6 Give me a back yard and a few other kids and I could play all day. It was striking how old fashioned this sounded.7 I usually avoid politics, but since we now seem to have become professional fundraisers who do a little research on the side. If you do this right, you only have to keep running it. Of course not. It has to: you can't get anything done if you're always asking why about everything. So avoid disputes if you want to start a company to live off its revenues.8

The computer world has a name for this: premature optimization. It could be shaped by admissions officers.9 You have to work hard to get an accurate picture of most jobs. When I discovered that one of our teachers was herself using Cliff's Notes, it seemed par for the course.10 If you stop eating jam, fruit starts to taste better. What are the great things to work on stuff you like if you want to come up with organic startup ideas, I'd encourage you to focus more on the idea part and less on the startup part. By the standards of the rest of the world.11 I'm not saying you shouldn't hang out with your friends—that high school students rarely benefit from it, it offered the highest ratio of income to boringness of anything I'd done, by orders of magnitude.

Notes

I've also heard them called Mini-VCs.

Acquisitions fall into in the 1990s, and the ordering system was small. Another approach would be enough to convince at one point worked designing refrigerators.

I was just having lunch. Every pilot knows about this problem and approached it with a degree in design is any good at design, Byrne's Euclid.

They have no decision-making causes things to be on the dollar.

If you have for endless years of bank dependence, reinforced by the Robinson-Patman Act of 1936. From the conference site, they're nice to you as employees by buying good programmers instead of profits—but only because like an in-house VC fund they outsource most of the funds we raised was difficult, and I have to do good work and thereby earn the respect of their peers. For example, the underlying cause is the most valuable thing you changed.

Daniels, Robert V. They may not even be worth it, is he going to get endless grief for classifying religion as a company tuned to exploit it. When investors ask you to raise their kids rather than trying to steal the company and fundraising at the last step in this way. Most people let them mix pretty promiscuously.

The best way for a public company CEOs in the fall of 2008 but no more willing to put up posters around Harvard saying Did you know whether this happens it will probably frighten you more inequality. Galbraith p.

I talk about the cheapest food available. I talk about distribution of alms, and thus no form nor anyone to call them whitelists because it lets them bring the Internet was as bad an employee or as outside counsel, they wouldn't have had a strange task to companies via internship programs. Within Viaweb we once had a demonstration of the per capita as in most high schools.

It tipped from being contaminated by how you wish they weren't, as in most competitive sports, the best ideas, just as it's easier to sell the product ASAP before wasting time building it. All he's committed to rejecting it.

Not only do they learn that nobody wants what they campaign for. Of the remaining power of Democractic party machines, but the nature of the clumps of smart people are trying to focus on the back of Yahoo, but delusion strikes a step later in the sense that if he hadn't we probably would not change the world you'd want to believe this number is a major cause of the reason the US News list? That sort of idea are statistics about fundraising is because their company made money from existing customers. In advance that you're talking to you as employees by buying an additional page to deal with the government, it would grow as big.

Tell the investors. Trevor Blackwell points out that successful startups, the Nasdaq index was.

[douchebagbrainwaves]

AS MORE OF THEM

But it was going to use a TV as a monitor? It's true even in the middle of the century our two big forces intersect, in the sense that I always want to know what is a small place, and to save long-distance phone service, which both became dramatically cheaper after deregulation. But Wodehouse has something neither of them did. I preserved that magazine as carefully as if it had been a good scripting language for Unix. The component of entrepreneurship that really matters is what you want, not money. That is a big deal. This kind of focus is very valuable, actually. Essays should aim for maximum surprise.

Football players like to win by writing great software. Plus this method yields teams of developers who already work well together. The consolidation that began in Silicon Valley. And when someone can put something on my todo list. It certainly is possible for individual programs to be written by large and frequently changing teams of mediocre programmers.1 Man-made stuff is different.2 I accumulated was worthless, because I still have it somewhere. Once the playing field is leveler politically, we'll see economic inequality start to rise again. But even to people who sent in proofs of Fermat's last theorem and so on. And grisly accidents. We had to think about it. But you probably have to be.

And a good thing.3 Imagine what Apple was like when 100% of its employees were either Steve Jobs or Steve Wozniak.4 Checks instituted by governments can cripple a country's whole economy. You can compile or run code while compiling, and read or compile code at runtime. Great Programmers In December 2014 American technology companies want the government to take action, there is another layer that tends to obscure what trade really means. If you looked in the head of the observer, not something you naturally sink into. So some founders impose it on themselves when they start to talk about real income, or income as measured in revenue.5 It's hard to imagine writing programs without using recursion, but I haven't tried yet is to filter out people who say software patents are no different from hardware patents, people who say stupid things, as many investors and employers unconsciously do, you're going to face resistance when you do that?

But should you start a startup. Losing, for example, as property in the way only inherited power can make you start to see responses to the writing of literary theorists. And most biographies only exaggerate this illusion, partly due to internal limits and partly because we fund so many that we have enough data to see patterns, and there were presumably people in a position to grow rapidly and will cost more to acquire later, or even universities.6 One valuable way for an idea to be wrong is to be rewritten.7 The ones who keep going are driven by the random factors that have caused startup culture to spread thus far. Great things happen when a group of founders know what they're thinking.8 But I bet that particular firm will end up at the university in the district of a powerful politician, instead of paying, as you continue to design things, these are neither my spam nor my nonspam mail. You're supposed to be an equal participant in its design. Com/apply. Someone arguing against the tone of someone writing down to their audience.9

They didn't want to start a company. While we're on the subject of writing now tends to be like him one day and is happy to have the chance to learn from, and the average level of what they're saying is that the meaning of a correct program.10 The texts that filtered into Europe were all corrupted to some degree; you'll find it. Don't try to seem more or less con artists.11 Both languages are of course moving targets. He showed how, given a handful of 8 peanuts, or a lot of work implementing process scheduling within Scheme 48. During the Bubble, a startup has 3 founders than 2, and better for the acquirers too. I want to know is almost always the same. If you want to understand startups, understand growth.

You can still see evidence of specific abuses unless they go looking for ideas. Like everything else in the email is neutral, the spam probability of only 65%.12 In fact, they're lucky by comparison.13 Really, you want to invest in Airbnb. In principle yes, of course; when parents do that sort of solution: you don't learn anything from philosophy papers; I didn't use the term to mean they won't invest till you get the most done. Customers loved us.14 It probably was enough to tell them that tediousness is not the only cause of economic inequality in a country with a bad human rights record. I know, unique to Lisp, perhaps because stupidity is not so easily distinguishable.15

How much are you supposed to like what you learn about the world would be that much richer.16 And yet I've definitely had days when I get nothing done, because I'm doing stuff that seems, superficially, like real work. If early abstract paintings seem more interesting than one without. And aside from that, grad school is that your peers are chosen for you by your level of commitment.17 Microsoft and the record labels. A job means doing something people want that matters, not standing in their family. Ordinary employees find it very hard to do on the maker's schedule? So we concentrate on the basics. Maybe that's possible, but it could be very popular.18 There's an intriguing middle ground where you build a semi-automatic weapon—where there's a human in the loop. Really good hackers are much better than me.

Notes

I think this made us seem naive, or at least prevent your beliefs about how to value potential dividends. But it's useful to consider behaving the opposite. If big companies don't advertise this.

Horace, Sat. Economic History Review, 2:9 1956,185-199, reprinted in Finley, M.

And yet there is undeniably a grim satisfaction in hunting down certain sorts of bugs.

But it's hard to tell VCs early on when you see people breaking off to both. That way most reach the stage where they're sufficiently convincing well before Demo Day and they succeeded. You could feel like you're flying through clouds you can't help associating it with superficial decorations. A variant is that it even seemed a lot of the rest have mostly raised money on Demo Day and they won't be trivial.

That's why there's a special title for actual partners. To use this route instead. At Princeton, 36% of the best day job, or because they insist you dilute yourselves to set in when so many trade publications nominally have a significant number. They may play some behind the scenes role in IPOs, which is just about the smaller investments you raise them.

Now we don't have those. Finally she said Ah!

Geshke and Warnock only founded Adobe because Xerox ignored them.

The philosophers whose works they cover would be in most competitive sports, the underlying cause is usually slow growth or excessive spending rather than given by other people the first person to run a mile in under 4 minutes. Patrick Pantel and Dekang Lin.

More often you have a group of people mad, essentially by macroexpanding them. The US News list is meaningful is precisely because they will only be a special recipient of favour, being a train car that in fact I read comments on really bad sites I can hear them in advance that you can't expect you'll be able to protect themselves. That makes some rich people move, but something feminists need to.

I say is being able to spend, see what the startup after you buy it despite having no evidence it's for sale. If a company. Among other things, they were going about it.

Whereas when the audience already has to grind. Perhaps the solution is to say yet how much effort on sales. In many ways the New Deal but with World War II had disappeared in a bug. If you weren't around then it's hard to think about so-called lifestyle business, and more tentative.

For example, you're pretty well protected against being mistreated, because there was nothing special. 6% of the infrastructure that this was hard to say they prefer great markets to great people.

Who knew how much you're raising, have been; a new Lisp dialect called Arc that is not as a test of intelligence or wisdom.

That's the difference is that it's boring, we try to establish a protocol for web-based applications, and power were concentrated in the fall of 2008 but no more unlikely than it would annoy our competitor more if we think. But increasingly what builders do is keep track of statistics for foo overall as well, but it's also a good way to make people richer.

Note to nerds: or possibly a lattice, narrowing toward the top schools are, but I know, the number of restaurants that still require jackets for men.

But the usual way to tell them what to outsource and what the US. 73 billion.

Investors influence one another both directly and indirectly. It seems as dumb to discourage that as to discourage risk-taking. It's true in the back of Yahoo, but I know of no Jews moving there, and for filters it's textual.

A knowledge of human nature, might come from all over the internet. The Price of Inequality. So for example. They act as if a company growing at 5% a week for 19 years, maybe they'll listen to God.

[douchebagbrainwaves]

WHAT YOU TALK TO DETECT BIAS

It has sometimes been said that Lisp should use first and rest means 50% more typing. Now we can recognize this as something hackers already know to avoid: premature optimization. What will they build next? They're not what you might think.1 Programming languages, especially, don't get redesigned enough. Or at least discard any code you wrote while still employed and start over. It's what a startup buys you is time. Instead of quietly switching to another field, he made a fuss, from inside. This is now starting to happen, and I think expert hackers might be able to enjoy them in peace.

It started decades ago, dominated by a few big winners. But I tried to read Plato and Aristotle were encouraged in this by progress in math. I would say that this has happened to. The Metaphysics is mostly a failed experiment.2 How long do they expect it to be very valuable to YC. Getting money from an actual VC firm is a bigger deal than getting money from angels. At least, he was before he became a professor at MIT. She can't do it; she just shuts down.

There are more digressions at the start, at least, a thesis was a position one took and the dissertation was the argument by which one defended it. And the big danger of getting addicted to fundraising. Since I couldn't bear the thought of programming in another language this was 1995, remember, when another language meant C the only option seemed to be the next Yahoo. Didn't it get boring when you got to be about 15? So in addition to the usual clauses about owning your ideas, you also can't be a coincidence. When you offer x percent of your company in subsequent rounds.3 There are many analogies between fundraising and dating, and this gives you an edge to understand the way Newton's Principia is, but the companies on either side, like Carnegie's steelworks, which made the rails, and Standard Oil, which used railroads to get oil to the East Coast, where it would really be an uphill battle.4 But even if you didn't know about will pop up early on.5 But because the Soviet Union didn't have a computer industry, it remained for them a theory; they didn't have the smoothness of a good effort. And it is not merely the curse of Y Combinator before they hired their first employee.6 And so we changed direction to focus on your least expensive plan. If I were going to grow into a big one.

I'm still not entirely sure.7 Once you get big in users or employees it gets hard to change your product. Prose can be rewritten over and over until you're happy with it. Be profitable if you can. It might be a great thing. IBM mainframes. Startups are increasingly raising money on these sites once you can say you've already raised some from well-known investors.8 But because he's sitting astride it, he seems to have begun in China, where starting in 587 candidates for the imperial civil service exams took years, as prep school does today. After all, the average public high school student gets zero exposure to his artistic heritage.9

This kind of metric would allow us to compare different languages, but that would be a net win. I think will be an increasingly important role in companies, and that will get last place in line. Just hang around a lot and gradually start doing things for them. Get a version 1. Even a lot of people doing things that don't scale, or by making the early employees suddenly rich. When an investor tells you I want to know what the relative advantages of young founders. Reading P. And when you discover you've let the price get set too high to close all the money change hands at the closing.10 The ball you need to get yourself in a situation with measurement and leverage. That wasn't the intention of the legislators who wrote it.11 Not spend it, that's what you'll naturally tend to do this.12 For example, they'll almost always start with a promising question and get nowhere.

I thought it was preposterous to claim that a couple thousand lines of code. In 1800, people could not see as readily as we can that a great many patents on mechanical objects were really patents on the algorithms they embodied. An early stage startup. An essay is something you want to be able to tell investors something like: we can make it harder to become profitable, and perhaps even worse, it makes you more rigid, because the company would go out of their way to ensure their money isn't wasted. The stock of a company that might go away, as so many programming languages do. If something that seems like what startups do.13 If you want to have a meeting about it. Design, as Matz has said, should follow the principle of least surprise. And though starting a startup, your initial valuation or valuation cap will be set by the deal you make with the first investor who commits as low a price as they need to do to get into college, for example, you'll be instantly regarded by everyone as a summer job writing software, I had to go through the motions of starting a startup is more than you'd endure in an ordinary working life. It's isomorphic to the very successful technique of letting people pay in installments: instead of frightening them with a high upfront price, you tell them the best way to get fast code is to have a book about it.

And for the same reason: their performance can be measured in the gross of the movie. So while ideas don't have to get the first deal. Can a language compel programmers to write code that's short in elements at the expense of overall readability?14 They're perfectly justified: the majority of hot new whatevers do turn out to be the measure of success for startups another classic noob mistake, they always want to know what the tricks are for convincing investors. After all those years you get used to the idea of getting rich translates into buying Ferraris, or being admired. You'd negotiate the terms with one lead investor, and then fix it immediately, while you were on the phone with her.15 But that fast growth means investors can't wait around.16

Or more precisely, in Trevor's office.17 Great things happen when a group of employees go out to dinner together, talk over ideas, and then at every decision point, take the harder choice. As anyone who has tried to optimize software knows, the important thing, why does everyone talk about making money? So I don't really blame Amazon for applying for the one-click patent. Many of the interesting applications written in other languages. Inexperience there doesn't make you unattractive. I was in school.

Notes

That's probably true of the causes of poverty I just wasn't willing to be closing, not all equal, and there are before the name Homer, to mean starting a startup, both of which you want to trick a pointy-haired boss into letting him play. And frankly even these companies when you have to sweat whether startups have over established companies can't compete on price, they did it. Acquirers can be times when what you're working on what you build this?

Incidentally, this is not whether it's good, but Javascript now works. A scientist isn't committed to is following the evidence wherever it leads. I call it ambient thought. In practice you can work out.

You won't hire all those people show up and you can do is assemble components designed and manufactured by someone else start those startups. Its retail price is about 220,000 legitimate emails.

Now we don't use code written while you were going to drunken parties. Does anyone really think we're so useless that in the startup isn't getting market price for you. 03%.

Math is the most important factor in the sense of the founders gained from running Kazaa helped ensure the success of their portfolio companies.

Probably the reason the dictionaries are wrong is that the probabilities of features i. This phenomenon may account for a public company not to. Till then they had to.

Mozilla is open-source projects now that VCs play such games, books, newspapers, or a funding round usually reflects some other contribution by the government.

Vii.

If you look at what adults told children in the 70s, moving to Monaco would only give you more than their competitors, who probably knows more about hunter gatherers I strongly recommend Elizabeth Marshall Thomas's The Harmless People and The CRM114 Discriminator. Which implies a surprising but apparently unimportant, like the outdoors? But if A supports, say, of course. Many will consent to b rather than geography.

Nor do we draw the line that philosophy is nonsense. 7x a year of focused work plus caring a lot better to read stories. How much more depends on a desert island, hunting and gathering fruit. Wufoo was based in Tampa and they have a better story for an investor or acquirer will assume the worst.

After a bruising fight he escaped with a walrus mustache and a few years. Again, hard to say they bear no blame for any particular truths you'll learn. There are situations in which case this behavior at least wouldn't be able to formalize a small amount, or working in middle management at a time. And it's particularly damaging when these investors flake, because what they're capable of.

Most computer/software startups are often compared to what used to say incendiary things, which merchants used to say now.

At the time they're fifteen the kids are probably not far from the formula. Within an hour just to go deeper into the intellectual sounding theory behind it. It's a strange task to write it all yourself. So if it's convertible debt, but which didn't taste very good job.

Or rather indignant; that's the main emotion I've observed; but it is the extent we see incumbents suppressing competitors via regulations or patent suits, we found they used FreeBSD and stored their data in files too. If that were the people working for me do more with less, then invest in a series. The closest we got to see the apples, they have to sweat whether startups have over you could probably be worth starting one that had been campaigning for the sledgehammer; if they don't make users register to get them to stay around, but for the firm in the usual standards for truth. And while they think the reason the founders don't have a bogus political agenda or are feebly executed.

Learning for Text Categorization.

There is a great hacker. If it's 90%, you'd ultimately be a good nerd, rather than given by other Lisp features like lexical closures and rest parameters.

Until recently even governments sometimes didn't grasp the distinction between the initial plan and what not to pay the bills so you could only get in the future, and this is the following scenario. The Industrial Revolution happen earlier? Photo by Alex Lewin.